►
From YouTube: Everything EOS #24: Blockchain Live Predictions, Aurora BP, and Universal Resource Inheritance
Description
Everything EOS is a weekly podcast hosted by Rob Finch (Cypherglass) and Zack Gall (ICO Alert) that follows the EOS ecosystem: dApp spotlights, VC partnerships, announcements, and more!
---------
Cross-Posted on the following YouTube channels:
http://www.everythingeos.io
https://www.youtube.com/c/icoalert
---------
Follow us on Twitter at
@icoalert
@finchify
@BlockchainZack
---------
LINKS/TOPICS MENTIONED IN EPISODE 24:
9:00 - Off the Chain Podcast - http://offthechain.libsyn.com/
10:00 - EOS 1.3.0 Release - https://github.com/EOSIO/eos/releases/tag/v1.3.0
11:16 - EOSDice and DEOS Hacked - https://www.zdnet.com/article/blockchain-betting-app-mocks-competitor-for-getting-hacked-gets-hacked-four-days-later/
15:00 - BancorX Announcement - https://blog.bancor.network/announcing-bancorx-the-first-cross-blockchain-decentralized-liquidity-network-aebb6a0dad8d
17:30 - MultiCoin Capital - https://multicoin.capital/2018/09/18/announcing-aurora-eos/
23:30 - Overview of Proxy Voting (Aurora EOS) - https://www.auroraeos.com/blog/an-overview-of-proxy-voting/
27:30 - Dan Blogging about URI - https://medium.com/@bytemaster/universal-resource-inheritance-505e7ca4d048
27:30 - In Defense of URI - https://medium.com/@bytemaster/in-defense-of-universal-resource-inheritance-1bb760cd27c4
31:50 - URI Telegram - https://t.me/EOS_URI
33:30 - Maple Leaf Capital - https://twitter.com/MapleLeafCap
A
Welcome
to
the
24th
edition
of
everything,
yose
I'm
Zack
Gaul
and
I
CEO
data
analyst
at
ICO
alert
the
trusted
ICO
discovery
platform
visit,
ICO
alert,
comm,
the
most
complete
calendar
of
all
active
and
upcoming
icos
and
I'm
here
today,
remotely
because
he's
in
London
with
the
founder
and
CEO
of
cypher
glass,
Rob
Finch.
Thank.
B
You
all
so
much
for
joining
us
for
yet
another
episode
of
everything
else.
We're
super
excited
to
have
everybody
here
for
yet
another
video
episode.
So
if
you're
listening
to
the
audio
only
version,
even
though
I
am
remote
in
London,
there
is
still
a
video
version.
So
if
you
want
to
check
that
out
head
over
to
everything,
yo
Scotty,
oh
you'll,
get
redirected
to
our
YouTube
channel,
you
can
go
ahead
and
take
a
look
at
that
video
version.
A
I,
just
also
want
to
mention
that
we
also
cross
post.
So
we
do
the
everything
SEO,
but
you
could
also
find
us
on
the
ico
alert
channel
by
searching
ico
alert
on
youtube
or
going
to
media
SEO
alert
calm
on
today's
podcast.
We're
gonna
be
discussing
more
speculation
around
the
upcoming
events
in
London,
which
Rob
is
that
currently
major
block
producer
candidate
announcement.
In
other
news
around
us
I/o
now.
B
Before
we
get
started,
I
do
need
to
mention
that
this
is
not
a
sponsored
podcast.
We're
just
too
excited
members
of
the
EOS
community.
Looking
to
talk
about
it,
sort
of
nerd
out
about
it
and
geek
out
about
it
on
the
podcast
this
podcast
anything
that
said,
should
not
be
construed
as
legal,
professional,
tax,
financial
or
any
other
kind
of
advice,
and
you
should
always
do
your
own
research
before
you
make
any
financial
decisions.
B
B
I
came
up
did
a
short
speech
about
why
I
think
Chios
is
the
future
of
blockchain
and
they
did
a
ton,
a
ton
of
Q&A
with
a
really
awesome
audience,
but
he
was
shout
out
to
the
guys
at
STK.
Crypto
I
met
their
whole
team
today,
really
great
group
guys
and
super
excited
to
see
what
they
end
up
investing
into
the
future,
with
their
50
million
dollar
u.s.
ecosystem
fund
in
partnership.
When.
B
I'm
super
excited
to
see
what
SDK
crypto
does
they're
a
great
group
of
guys
that
I
met
earlier
today
and
also
last
night,
but
met
their
entire
team
today,
at
their
offices
here
in
London,
but
I'm
excited
to
see
what
US
projects
they
invest
in
if
you're
not
familiar
with
SDK
crypto,
they
run
a
50
million
dollar
u.s.
ecosystem
fund
in
partnership
with
block
ones
billion
dollar
gap
fund
through
ESP
C,
so
they're,
one
of
those
four
or
five
guys
doing
that.
So.
B
Seems
like
a
lot
of
people
recognize
me,
probably
because
of
all
the
videos,
and
now
that
you
know
the
video
podcast
is
happening,
but
mostly
because
of
the
cypher
glass
YouTube
videos.
So
a
lot
of
people
came
up
and
said:
you
know,
hey
I
know
you
do
you
know
me
and
I
was
like
no
they're
like?
Oh
you
don't
recognize
me
by
my
telegram
photo
and
they
looked
totally
different
than
telling
and
it
was
pretty
funny
it
was.
B
A
B
Said
hi
everyone
we
look
forward
to
seeing
the
finest
blockchain
innovators
at
blockchain
live
and
the
EOS
mobile
hackathon
in
London
next
week.
We
are
excited
that
the
EOS
I/o
protocol
has
rapidly
become
the
fastest
felis
and
the
most
used
blockchain
in
the
world
and
are
committed
to
continually
improving
the
resilience
and
effectiveness
of
the
EOS
I/o
code
base
to
facilitate
mass
adoptions
of
decentralized
applications
in
the
block
one
village
at
blockchain
live
on
September
26th.
We
will
be
showcasing
new,
cutting-edge
applications
powered
by
es
IO
that
include
identity,
music,
gaming,
finance,
transportation
and
email.
B
We
will
not
be
unveiling
block
ones
next,
applications
until
after
blockchain
live,
but
we'll
schedule
a
designated
product,
much
event
for
this
introduction
in
due
course,
it's
great
to
see
so
many
new
applications
being
launched
and
applying
to
the
es
VC
funding
program.
We
look
forward
to
seeing
you
all
in
London
next
week,
so
we
know
with
that.
Obviously
it's
not
gonna
be
anything
pluck
ones
applications,
but
it
is
gonna,
be
some
new
applications,
so
I'm
curious
to
see
what
those
will
be.
You.
A
Or
a
world
yeah,
so
that's
kind
of
my
prediction
because
it
just
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
me
why
he
finished
it
off
with
that.
I
think.
The
reason
he
put
this
message
out
was
to
kind
of
lower
the
expectations
and
hype
a
little
bit,
because
if
he
didn't
put
out
that
telegram
message,
as
we
typically
see
in
crypto
people,
people
think
that
the
world
is
going
to
change
after
every
announcement
and
usually
people's
expectations
are
much
higher
than
what
actually
happens.
I
mean
we're
in
the
same
boat.
B
A
What
else
is
going
on
here,
so
Mike
Novogratz
your
best
favorite
VC
fund
manager?
He
called
he
called
the
bottom.
What
do
you
think
about
that?
So
he
posted
a
tweet.
The
other
day
was
the
date
September
13th
yeah,
and
he
said
this
is
the
BG
CI,
which
BG
CI
is
the
Bloomberg
crypto
index
and
he
said
I
think
we
put
in
a
low
yesterday,
retouched
the
highs
of
late
last
year,
in
the
point
of
acceleration
that
led
to
the
massive
rally
slash
bubble
markets
to
retrace
to
the
breakout.
A
B
I
think
it's
pretty
interesting,
I
mean
I've,
seen
a
lot
of
people.
Try
to
do
this
from
you
know
three
months
ago
to
six
months
ago
to
even
today
or
last
week,
so
you
know,
but
who
knows,
if
you'll
actually
be
right,
but
what
better
person
to
make
a
prediction
that
no
regrets
himself
he's
sort
of
it,
the
ultimate
us
bowl
other
than
maybe
me
I,
don't
know,
I
might
be
more
bullish
on
you,
never
regret,
says,
but.
A
B
Gets
up
it's
like
those
accounts,
they
try
to
predict.
You
know
who
wins.
The
Super
Bowl
at
the
beginning
of
the
season
and
they'll
send
out
a
hundred
different
tweets
with
all
the
different
possibilities
and
the
scores,
and
then
they
just
delete
all
the
tweets
that
were
wrong
to
be.
Like
look,
I
predicted
that
I
did
it
correctly
so.
B
A
But
there's
positive
things
coming
I,
don't
know
if
we're
gonna
see
the
rally
everyone
expects
this
year,
but
backs
coming
out
in
November,
so
I'm
still
super
bullish
on
that
the
etf
decision,
it's
probably
going
to
get
delayed
again,
but
that's
coming
up
for
the
Vanek
solid
x,
ETF,
that's
coming
up
at
the
end
of
this
month.
So
if
that
got
approved,
some
house
and
the
bull
run
is
on
but
I'm
expecting
another
delay
and
possibly
a
decision
in
like
February.
Well.
B
If
anybody's
listening
and
you're
wondering
more
about
the
ETF
and
want
to
hear
it
from
the
actual
people
at
Vanek
themselves,
Anthony
Papa,
Lionel,
otherwise
known
as
pump
on
Twitter,
did
a
really
awesome
podcast.
It's
called
off
the
chain
where
he
actually
interviews
one
of
the
guys
from
Vanek
talks
about
why
they're
doing
an
etf,
why
their
etf
gotta
got
declined
two
times
in
the
past.
What
they
change
to
sort
of
you
know
appease
the
regulator's
and
hope
that
it
gets
through
this
time.
B
B
Interesting
I
mean
he
talks
all
about.
You
know
what
the
problems
that
the
regulator's
had
with
the
etf
the
first
two
times
and
how
they
sort
of
move
the
goalposts.
So
the
first
time
was:
oh
there's
not
enough
liquidity.
The
second
time
was,
you
know
some
other
thing
that
was
then
resolved,
and
now
the
third
time
we'll
see
what
it
is,
but
they
seem
to
be
continually
moving.
The
goalposts
which
I
think
is
interesting
and
seems
very,
very
typical
of
something
the
sec
would
do,
especially
when
it
comes
to
a
crypto,
ETF
mm-hmm.
A
B
So
they
black
one
actually
does
do
weekly
news
releases.
Usually
it's
it's
smaller
releases
like
when
1.2.5
when
it
to
that
six
things
like
that,
but
this
was
a
sort
of
it
would
call
it
medium
release.
Obviously,
2.0
would
be
a
major
release,
but
1.3
is
sort
of
a
medium
sized
release.
The
biggest
thing
is
that
the
was--
am
engine
wasn,
which
is
basically
what
processes
transactions
using
your
cpu
power
that
your
tokens
have
on
the
u.s.
network.
B
That
was
actually
replaced
with
a
new
engine
called
wabbit,
which
I
think
is
kind
of
an
interesting,
silly
rabbit
yeah
silly
wabbit
tricks
are
for
kids,
but
waa
BTW
instead
of
w
ASM.
The
main
difference
here
is
that
it
processes
transactions
twice
as
fast.
So
you
know
es
was
very
fast
before
a
processing
transaction.
Now
it's
twice
as
fast.
So
if
you
had
10
yo
states
the
amount
of
transactions
you
could
send
with
those
10
years
a
week
ago,
you
can
now
it's
effectively.
B
A
A
That's
terrible,
yeah,
so
I
guess
speaking
of
games,
yes
bet
and
DS
games
the
hack
last
week,
yeah
I
thought
that
was
I
thought
I
was
funny
because
yes
bet
put
out
a
tweet
last
week
and
it
said
Dias
games,
a
clone
and
competitor
of
our
dice
game
has
suffered
a
severe
hack
today
that
drained
their
bankroll.
As
of
now
we're.
As
of
now,
every
single
dice
game
and
clone
site
has
been
hacked.
A
A
B
From
their
perspective,
I
mean
they
lost
about
$220,000,
but
these
guys
are
churning
out
70
grand
in
profit
a
day
which
is
about
25
million
a
year.
So
they
had
plenty
of
bankroll
to
cover
this
and
make
sure
no
users
were
actually
affected.
They
just
sort
of
drained
their
bankroll
I'm,
not
actually
sure
what
the
specific
vulnerability
was
that
allowed
them
to
constantly
win,
but
it
involved
the
jackpot.
So
somebody
was
consistently
rolling
under
five
and
betting,
some
specific
amount
of
Eos
and
basically
winning
a
thousand
yes
every
time
they
did
it.
B
A
B
A
Think
this
one
was
different.
This
one
I'm,
not
a
hundred
percent
sure
this
one
I'm
pretty
sure,
had
something
to
do
with
an
or
statement
in
the
code
and
a
lot
of
different
projects.
The
reason
they
all
got
hacked
was
because
they
all
used
the
same
smart
contract
template
for
this
specific
piece
of
code
and
it
had
a
vulnerability
in
it
that
passed
all
of
the
auditing.
Oh
wow
and
I.
B
What
happened
with
new
decks
was
people
basically
made
a
custom
token,
so
anybody
can
make
a
token
on
the
blockchain.
You
call
whatever
you
want,
but
they
all
have
unique
contract
addresses,
but
instead
of
the
actual
new
decks
decentralize
exchange
contract
checking
to
make
sure
it
was
the
specific
contract
address
associated
with
the
really
ghost
tokens.
Instead,
it
was
just
sort
of
looking
at
the
name.
Yes
I
believe
so
they
printed
a
billion
of
these
faking.
B
Those
tokens
and
just
went
and
bought
all
kinds
of
tokens
on
the
exchange,
basically
for
free
because
they
burned
the
tokens
to
do
it
so
bought
a
bunch
of
haikyuu,
karma
I.
Think
Horace
stuff
like
that,
but
new
decks
refunded
all
their
users
I
think
was
about
60
grand.
Did
they
law
so
not
too
bad
there,
and
it
was
a
bug
that
was
fixed
and
now
something
that
I'm
sure
every
developer
will
check
in
their
contracts
from
now
on
to
make
sure
that
they're,
looking
for
the
specific
US
contract
code,
it's.
A
B
A
B
It
adds
a
significant
amount
of
liquidity
and
is
very
helpful
for
things
like
ICO
tokens
that
don't
have
a
tender
liquidity
and
will
be
helpful
now
on
iou's
for
things
like
airdrop
liquidity,
but
what's
interesting
about
it,
is
that
they're
sort
of
not
necessarily
rebranding,
but
you
know
co-branding
this
thing
as
bank
or
exxon
AOS
that
the
EO
smart
token
would
be
called
a
OS
x
and
you'll
be
able
to
to
seamlessly
trade
on
the
exchange
without
actually
trading
with
anyone
else.
So
it's
with.
A
B
Us
more
views
on
YouTube
everything
via
smart
token.
Basically
is
what
that
was,
but
the
I
don't
know
it's
interesting
I
mean
that
the
only
other
time
I've
seen
X's
in
the
ecosystem
is
with
IQ
X.
It's
just
what
BitFenix
added
to
the
IQ
pair,
since
their
trading
system
only
allows
trading
pairs
that
are
three
digits
long,
so
obviously
IQs
too,
they
had
another
one.
So
it's
IQ
x,
but
I,
don't
think
that's
really
related
here.
But
it's
interesting
bankers
has
been
fascinating
to
me
how
you're
able
to
have
basically
a
reserve
pool
of
funds.
B
So
if
you're
trading
a
OS
for
IQ,
for
example,
you
know,
there's
a
reserve
pool
of
Eos
in
a
reserve
pool
of
IQ
associated
with
this
smart
token.
So
when
you
swap
them,
you're,
essentially
pulling
some
out
of
the
reserves
and
depositing
some
of
the
reserves
into
the
one
that
you're
selling.
So
it's
really
interesting
how
they
can
do
it
with
nobody
actually
selling
the
token
to
you
or
buying
the
token
from
you.
A
A
B
That's
pretty
crazy
and
if
you
look,
they
put
out
I'm
trying
to
find
the
link
now,
but
bank
were
actually
listed,
the
it's
the
first
five
tokens
on.
Yes,
that
they
will
support
all
airdrops,
which
I
think
is
pretty
amazing,
because
the
the
biggest
issue
right
now
with
airdrops
obviously
is
the
quiddity
I'm
gonna.
Depending
on
how
many
you
have
it's,
either
very
easy
to
sell
them
on
a
decentralized
exchange,
but
some
people
can
be
very
hard.
B
So
this
will
just
help
everybody,
you
know
always
have
liquidity
to
buy
or
sell
these
air
drops
whenever
they
want
to
so
I
know
that
I
he
was
included.
I
believe
Dios
was
included,
which
I
thought
was
pretty
interesting.
Change
was
included
and
I.
Think
a
few
others
were
in
that
that
list
of
the
initial
tokens
that
will
be
supported
so
kind
of
make.
You
see
right.
A
B
A
I've
been
a
big
fan
of
multicore
I
mean
its
not
multi
coin
capitals.
So
let
me
just
start
this
off.
There's
a
guy
his
name's
miles,
Schneider.
He
was
an
analyst
at
multi
coin.
Capped
I'm,
not
sure
how
long
he
was
there,
but
I
think
it
said
he
was
one
of
their
first
hires
and
if
anyone's
familiar
with
multi
coin
capital,
they've
put
out
some
of
the
absolute
best
research
articles
on
AOS
and
they're,
like
very
detailed
analytical.
A
One
of
them
is
koteas
analysis.
Evaluation,
one
was
on
delegated
proof
of
stake
and
the
features
and
trade-offs
models
for
scaling,
trustless
computation
and
why
decentralisation
matters
and
those
are
all
US
based
analyst
reports.
You
can
check
those
out
on
the
multi
coin
capital
site,
so
he
was
one
of
their
lead
analysts
and
he
kind
of
spun
off
this
block
producer
candidate
and
he's
using
multi
coin
capital
as
advisors
and
then
he's
going
to
be
advising
multi
Queen
capital.
So
it's
kind
of
like
they're
separate
entities
but
they're
still
kind
of
tied
together
similar.
B
That's
fair:
it's
input,
yeah
Aurora,
yes,
I,
looked
at
their
block
producer.
Canada-Us
network
monitor
I
Oh
a
couple
days
ago
and
they
had
I
think
three
hundred
thousand
votes.
But
now
there
are
2.2
million.
So
still
at
number
111.
They
have
a
long
way
to
go
to
climb
up
to
actually
be
paid,
but
I
think
they'll
get
there
over
time.
So.
A
How
do
you
feel
about
so
Kyle's
cemani
he's
actually
the
CEO
of
multi
coin?
He's
not
that
he's
not
part
of
the
block
producer
node,
though
he
he
put
out
an
announcement
on
forbes.com,
announcing
their
block
producer,
voter
criteria
and
Haley
named
the
three
block
producers,
who
are
all
great
block
producers?
Yes,
New
York,
yes,
Canada
and
Toto
Kanaka,
as
well
as
Aurora,
so
I
guess,
for
how
do
you
feel
about
the
snub.
B
I
think
it
is
kind
of
crazy
not
to
include
us
when
we've
been
pushing
for
for
everything
it's
in
the
best
interest
of
network.
You
know
we
put
up
$100,000
our
raw
bounty.
We
you
know,
do
do
things
in
the
best
entry
network,
like
prevent
VP
collusion,
we
go
out
and
make
sure
that
you
know
block
boosters,
don't
own
other
portions
blog
producers.
We
were
the
reason
why
so
many
block
producers
now
are
switching
to
dedicated
Hardware
over
cloud
infrastructure.
B
A
I
mean
maybe
maybe
it's
because
they
only
wanted
to
endorse
the
people
who
they
had
a
personal
connection,
to
not
saying
it's
like
collusion
or
anything,
but
he
just
has
to
get
to
know
you
a
little
bit
better
and
along
with
a
lot
of
other
great
block
producers,
because
I
think
gray.
Mass
is
one
of
the
absolute
best
block
producers
putting
out
some
of
the
best
releases
and
they're
not
on
there.
So
I
was
joking.
A
B
A
B
Yeah
I
could
totally
see
them
that
it
makes
it
10
a
sense,
especially
now
running
a
BP
I
could
see
them.
You
know
launching
another
fund
alongside
their
existing
funds.
That's
specifically
focused
on
us,
because
that's
how
you
know
the
guys
at
STK
and
tomorrow
we
see
and
all
these
people
do
it
they,
rather
than
just
adding
that
money
to
their
existing
fund.
They
have
a
totally
separate
fund
structure
within
their
their
entity
that
they,
then
you
know,
use
to
go
out
and
invest
in
these
ES
projects.
So
they
sort
of
keep
it
separate.
Yeah.
A
And
I,
like
I
like
Aurora,
how
they
announced
their
main
thing:
there
they're
kind
of
campaigning
on
his
education,
cultivating
education
and
engaging
and
informing
the
es
community,
yeah
and
they've
multi
coin
capital
and
is
being
done
and
behind
the
scenes
by
Miles
Snyder
who's.
This
now
the
CEO
of
the
BP
candidate
they've
been
educating
the
community
for
a
long
time.
I've
learned
a
lot
about
EIS
and
delegated
proof
of
stake
myself
from
the
multi
coin.
Capital
articles
that
they've
put
out
in
the
past.
Oh.
B
Yeah
I
mean
the
stuff
that
they
do
is
is
very
fact-based.
I
mean
they
do
a
ton
of
research.
To
put
these
proposals
together
and
they're,
usually
very,
very
detailed,
and
you
can
learn
a
lot.
There
are
some
interesting
nuances
in
there
that
they,
you
know,
make
sure
to
know
it.
So
if
you
guys
haven't
read
any
of
their
stuff,
go
and
check
it
out.
If
you
just
google
multipoint
capital,
you'll
see
their
website
and
ping
it
to
their
blog
sort
of
go
from
there.
Yeah.
A
They
also
I'm,
not
sure
rora.
Yes,
it's
hard
to
distinguish
between
the
two
now,
because
there's
still
multi
coin
capital
out
there,
but
now
I
got
a
separate
Aurora.
They
put
out
a
blog
post
right
after
their
announcement
about
proxies,
which
I
thought
was
pretty
interesting.
They
broke
down
the
four
different
with
what
they
say
are
the
four
different
categories
of
proxies.
They
broke
them
down
into
altruistic
or
ideological
proxies
block
producer
proxies,
Enterprise,
DAP
and
investor
proxies
and
exchange
proxies,
and
they
gave
it
a
nice
little
detailed
paragraph.
A
That
explains
the
differences
between
the
four
and
I
thought.
It
was
interesting
because
it's
something
that
like
made
sense
after
I,
read
it
but
I,
wouldn't
have
thought
to
talk
about
it
or
write
about
it,
myself,
right
because
I
think,
as
as
we
get
closer
to
referendum,
going,
live
and
more
and
more
things
being
up
for
vote
from
whether
the
WPS
passes
and
then
the
referendum
and
then
also
keeping
track
of
all
these
block
producers.
A
B
Point
I,
like
proxies
for
the
most
part
I
like
the
the
enterprise
DAP,
that
mr.
proxies
the
altruistic,
naughty
logical
ones
and,
of
course
the
the
exchange
proxies
think
are
good
because
it
allows
people
who
otherwise
wouldn't
have
the
opportunity
to
vote
the
ability
to
vote,
but
the
only
one
I
have
a
problem
with
how
people
octrees
for
proxy.
So
these
are
block
producers
that
are
going
out
there
setting
up
a
proxy
to
basically
vote
for
themselves.
B
So
while
they
are
voting
for
other
people
that
they
sort
of
agree
with
them,
aligned
with
I,
don't
think
that
you
know
I
think
there's
a
pretty
big
conflict
of
interest
there,
because,
even
if
that
blog
producer
doesn't
have
the
best
interest
of
the
network
at
heart-
or
you
know,
makes
a
mistake,
maybe
they're
missing
blocks
all
the
time.
They're,
not
gonna,
unload
themselves
from
their
proxy
there's.
There's
not
gonna.
Do
it.
B
So
we've
said
from
the
the
very
beginning,
even
before
the
main'
at
launch,
that
cyber
glass
will
never
run
a
proxy,
we
don't
think
other
blog
producers
should
run
proxies.
Is
it
just
a
very
big
conflict
of
interest
so
you're
out
there
you're
looking
for
a
proxy
to
delegate
your
vote
to
I
highly
recommend
you
pick
somebody
that's
independent
and
not
associated
directly
with
a
blocker,
so.
B
I
would
probably
either
go
with
the
ideological
proxies,
so
people
like
the
EOS
freedom
proxy,
which
is
run
by
Asheville
ro
great
guy
I've,
talked
with
him.
A
lot
he's
a
very
cool
guy,
very
passionate
about
sort
of
the
libertarian
views
of
crypto
and
how
it
can
really
change
the
world.
So
I
love
that
I
think
it's
great
to
sort
of
vote
that
way.
I
wish
you
could
delegate
your
vote
to
multiple
proxies
by
the
way.
It
would
be
nice
to
be
able
to
delegate
to
somebody
like
our
own
at
the
u.s.
A
B
B
A
Exactly
I
wish
I
could
maybe
let's
say,
for
example,
if
I
vote
100
percent,
so
100
my
tokens
towards
cypher
glass,
but
then
I,
split,
50-50
tokens
to
one
block
produced
and
fifty
to
another
I
don't
know,
maybe
maybe
that's
just
too
confusing
this.
The
whole
voting
thing
is
already
kind
of
confusing
to
the
average
person
who's,
not
not,
as
in
the
blockchain
and
crypto
as
we
are
so
I
think
it
was
mostly
just
done
for
simplification
if
I
had
to
guess
yeah.
B
I
think
they
they
mean
like
a
and
this
this
should
be
letter
down
the
line.
There
are
more
important
problems
than
these,
but
I
think
it's
like
fun.
At
this
point
user
section
where
you
know
you
can
check
and
check
an
option
and
gray
mass
or
something
like
that,
and
then
now
you
can
proxy
to
multiple
people,
obviously
that
that
has
to
be
implemented
on
the
chain
first,
but
I
could
definitely
see
that
being
added
later
down
the
line.
Once
the
the
you
know,
more
critical
things
are
in
place,
I
think.
A
The
universal
basic
income,
but
you
be
eyes,
are
you
are,
is
a
little
bit
different
and
then
three
days
later,
he
put
out
another
blog
post
defending
against
some
of
the
comments
he
got
on
the
first
blog
post.
So
the
last
time
we
talked
about
the
URI
or
you
bi
or
you
whatever.
We
want
to
call
it
this
week.
The
universal
resource
inheritance
is
that's
currently
going
by
you're
somewhat
against
it,
as
your
opinion
changed
at
all.
Now
that
Dan's
put
out
more
explanation
on
how
it
would
occur.
I
think.
B
On
a
scale
of
how
against
I
am
I,
probably
gone
from
like
a
hundred
percent
against
it
to
maybe
eighty
or
ninety
percent
against
it,
so
I'm
definitely
still
against
it,
but
I'm
open
to
sort
of
hearing
more
about
what
he
has
to
say.
You
know
seeing
more
of
his
defense
of
these
arguments
in
these
comments
that
are
putting
out
that
the
main
problem
I
have
with
it
is
I'm,
just
not
a
fan
of
giving
people
free
money
for
doing
nothing.
Just
for
existing.
You
know:
hey
you're
alive,
have
to
have
some
money.
B
Have
these
this
universal
resource
inheritance
without
adding
any
value
back
into
the
network.
I
think.
Maybe
if
there
were
some
kind
of
you
know,
requirements
to
get
it,
you
have
to
add
value.
You
have
to
work
on
something
I,
don't
know,
but
I've
just
sort
of
a
problem
with
giving
people
money
for
free.
So
so.
A
A
Stick
by
what
I
said
a
few
weeks
ago
is
I,
don't
see
this
happening
really
soon,
necessarily,
but
but
if
this
were
ever
to
be
implemented
it
whatever
your
inheritance
would
be
would
be
very,
very
small
until,
like
years
from
now
when
the
market
cap
is
in
the
trillions
or
if
your
bets
correct
by
the
end
of
this
year,
but
I'm
not
gonna,
bet
on
that.
But
he
made
some
really
good
points.
In
the
blog,
though
I
mean.
B
It's
it's
interesting.
What
he's
talking
about
here?
It's
he's
basically
talking
about
redistributing
wealth
over
100
year
period,
so
every
hundred
years
the
wealth
basically
turns
over
which
I
just
I
don't
know.
Maybe
I
have
too
many
negative
connotations
about
redistribution
of
wealth,
but
it
sounds
very
socialist.
They
could
border
on
like
a
if
it
goes
too
far.
B
It
could
be
communist
ik
depending
on
you
know
how
high
the
inflation
rate
is,
but
basically,
if
it's
four
percent
inflation
every
year
and
they're
redistributing
that
to
everybody,
people
at
the
bottom
of
the
ladder
are
benefiting
the
most
and
the
people
at
the
top
are
actually
losing
money,
because
their
value
is
being
deflated
more
than
obviously
they're
getting
in
the
URI.
So
I,
don't
know
we'll
see
what
happens
with
it.
B
A
You
get
a
chance
to
catch
his
Monopoly
analogy,
so
he
used
an
analogy
and
I
think
it
was
in
his
second
blog
post,
his
follow-up,
where
he
said
with
the
simple:
if
you're
playing
Monopoly,
you
just
implement
this
one
simple
rule
where,
after
every
everybody's
turn,
you
distribute
one
percent
of
the
wealth
evenly
to
each
each
player
and
what
happens?
Is
it
still
lets
players
kind
of
take
the
lead?
You
can
still
accumulate
a
lot
of
wealth
in
the
game,
but
you
have
a
much
harder
time
bankrupting
your
opponents
and
it's
a
it's.
A
A
great
concept
and
I.
Actually
Pete
Kay
and
I
actually
tried
doing
this
in
the
office,
and
we
could
not
finish
the
game
we
played
for
about
six
hours
and
we
had
some
other
people
playing
too.
So
it
wasn't
just
one-on-one
and
we
weren't
playing
consistently
through
is
kind
of
like
throughout
the
day.
But
we
couldn't
end
the
game.
It
was
impossible
to
bankrupt
someone
by
those
rules.
I
don't
know.
B
A
B
Just
think
the
fact
that
you're
I
mean
it
just
kind
of
surprises
me,
and
this
is
coming
from
Dan.
Somebody
who
you
know
agrees
that
taxation
is
theft.
Do
you
think
Cena
shouldn't
be
doing
that,
but
at
the
same
time
is
then
willing
to
basically
steal
money
from
people
and
redistribute
it
to
other
people.
So
it
just
surprises
me
that
that's
coming
from
to
be
honest,
you.
A
A
That's
why
I
support
it,
but
the
interesting
thing
is
I'm
in
the
URI
telegram
channel,
which
I
recommend
anyone
that
finds
this
topic
interesting,
I'll,
post
a
link
to
the
URI
channel,
there's
only
about
600
people
in
it
it's
a
it's,
not
even
necessarily
an
es
channel,
but
it's
URI
and
it's
it
seems
like
that's.
Where
dan
has
been
the
most
active.
A
B
The
one
twitter
handle
that
we've
covered
a
couple
of
times
here
on
the
podcast
that
have
some
really
interesting
tweets
form.
So
you
know
and
15
tweets
that
are
all
together
sort
of
about
the
same
topic.
Different
thoughts
on
the
topic
is
may
believe:
capital
on
twitter
at
maple,
leaf
cap,
great
person,
persons
behind
the
account
we're
not
really
sure
if
they're
real
investment
founders
or
somebody.
This
is
a
high.
A
Fall
a
man
they
don't
have
a
lot
of
followers,
but
I
recommend
everyone
listening
to
follow
them
because
they
put
a
lot
of
thought
into
these
posts.
Like
the
same
way.
I
like
reading
the
multi
coin,
capital
blog
post,
because
they're
obviously
very
well
researched
and
very
thoughtful
opinions,
same
thing
with
maple
leaf
cap,
whoever
they
are
yeah.
B
Absolutely
but
they
put
out
a
interesting
tweet
storm,
starting
with
I,
can't
quite
envision.
Oh
no.
This
is
actually
the
last
part
of
that
tweet
storm
I
recognize
it,
but
they
put
it
a
bit:
a
big
tweet
storm
about
URI
Universal
resource
inheritance
and
how
will
be
implemented,
they're
sort
of
trying
to
start
a
debate
which
I
thought
was
interesting.
Maybe
it's
Dan
himself
behind
the
Twitter
handle
putting
out
these
earth
these
topics
before.
A
B
I
mean
I,
don't
know,
maybe
he
when
he
wants
to
disseminate
an
opinion,
although
I
don't
know
I
think
he's
best
equipped
to
do
any
of
that,
because
people
listen
generally
to
what
he
says,
or
at
least
are
willing
to.
You
know
read
his
post
similar
with
URI,
even
though
people
might
not
agree
with
it,
they're
willing
to
read
it
and
sort
of
hear
him
out
and
engage
in
debate
so
I
don't
know
that
it
would
really
benefit
him
to
be
honest,
to
go,
rogue
and
be
anonymous.
So.
B
Let
me
pull
it
up,
so
part
of
this
threat
is
assuming
that
it
is
the
full
four
percent
token
inflation
which
is
basically
allocated
to
the
worker
proposal
system.
Right
now
nobody's
really
sure
what
to
do
with
that
inflation
we're
looking
at
reducing
it
to
one
percent.
So
it's
not
four
percent
of
what
maybe
several
hundred
billion
dollar
market
cap
in
the
future,
but
he
gives
a
pretty
interesting
example.
B
So,
a
simple
scenario-
let's
say
he
owes-
is
a
hundred
tokens
that
split
equally
between
two
accounts
be
very
simple:
you
basically
slice
the
pie
and
fifty
tokens
per
user
becomes
fifty
two,
so
each
of
them
get
an
extra
two
tokens
for
percent
inflation,
so
they're
both
equal.
But
if
you
had
100
tokens,
also
split
between
user
two
users,
but
one
is
99
tokens.
Any
other
is
one
by
the
end
of
year.
One
the
account
with
less
es,
ends
up
with
much
more.
B
A
A
A
The
the
piece
of
that
tweet
that
I
found
the
most
interesting
was
how
they
mentioned
steam
2.0
and
how
kind
of
kind
of
they
would
fit
together.
So
they
said
quote:
I
can't
quite
envision.
How
Dan
would
implement
this
yet,
but
I
suspect
it
would
be
a
page
rank
type.
Social
proof
model
that
also
rewards
policing
users
that
report
false
unique
accounts.
This
will
be
how
steam
2.0
and
the
EOS
URI
system
get
bonded
together.
So
what
that
means
is
we've
kind
of
like
for
any
of
this
URI
stuff
to
work.
A
You
have
to
have
unique
identity.
There
no
other
way
around
it.
If
you
could
create
multiple
accounts
for
one
user,
then
it
would
it
wouldn't
work
and-
and
you
could
have
multiple
accounts,
but
only
the
ones
like
I
have
multiple
years
accounts.
But
if
this
system
were
put
in
place,
only
one
of
my
accounts
could
have
my
like
verified
identity
on
it,
and
that
would
be
the
only
one
that
would
receive
a
URI
right.
It's
but
go
ahead.
A
One
of
the
biggest
problems
with
the
internet
today
and
it
could
be
YouTube
Twitter,
everybody's
anonymous,
so
I
can
create
a
troll
account
to
trow
you
on
Twitter
and
it's
it's
like
a
throwaway
account.
There's
nothing
stopping
me
from
doing
that.
So
I
don't
have
to
I
worry
about
my
public
reputation.
So
I'm
not
gonna,
come
blast.
Someone
on
my
actual
Twitter,
but
if
I
really
wanted
to
I,
could
create
a
Twitter
and
go
troll.
Whoever
I
want
if
I
wanted
to.
B
I
think
that's
a
problem.
I
think
that's
a
feature
to
be
honest
with
that.
You
can
go
and
you
know
make
an
account
troll
somebody
you
can
take
on
a
new
persona
if
you
want
and
tweet
crazy
things
like
maple
leaf
cap,
for
example,
wouldn't
exist
and
when
may
not
be
tweeting
these
things.
If
he
had
to
have
his
reel
his
or
her
real
identity
associated
with
it,
I
think.
A
There's
different
use
cases
honestly,
it
depends
on
the
level
of
trust
required,
for
whatever
system
were
talking
about
that
would
wear
a
unique
account
would
make
it
a
better
feature
than
then
the
anonymous
feature,
but
the
reason
I
brought
this
piece
of
the
tweet
up
was
just
esteem
2.0,
how
he
hypothesized,
how
it
could
interact
and
work
with
the
EOS,
URI
and
Anna
from
es
tribe
on
telegram
actually
in
the
in
the
URI
Channel
actually
asked,
would
you
RI
be
used
for
steam,
2.0
and
Dan
straight-up
answered
it
directly
and
said?
Yes,
maybe.
B
This
is
so
I
was
talking
with
the
SPK
crypto
guys
this
morning
actually
well
Thursday
morning.
If
you
listen
to
this
on
Friday-
and
we
were
talking
about-
you
know
Facebook,
how
are
they
going
to
disrupt
Facebook?
If
that's,
what
block
one's
trying
to
do?
They've
come
up
many
times,
saying
that
almost
verbatim
in
blog
posts,
but
how
can
they
actually
convince
people
to
move?
Maybe
their
plan
is
to
just
pay
people
where
hey,
if
you
want
to
you,
know,
get
this
URI.
B
A
Research,
this
myself
I
read
it
on
telegram
or
read
or
something
so
I,
don't
know
if
it's
true,
but
someone
said
that
that's
how
PayPal
on-boarded
their
original
users,
where,
if
you
signed
up
for
a
PayPal
account
like
nearly
2,000
late,
90s
I,
don't
know
when
it
was.
But
there
is
a
$10
credit
available
in
your
account.
I.
B
Think
it
even
still
exists
today.
If
you
refer
somebody,
so
if
you're
already
in
PayPal,
you
have
account-
and
you
refer
somebody
to
PayPal
I-
think
you
both
get
10
bucks,
so
it's
very
similar
to
virtually
any
other
service.
Like
you
know,
uber,
you
refer
somebody,
you
both
get
a
$20
riding
credit.
The
big
difference
with
PayPal
was
that
it
was
real
money
that
you
could
actually
go
and
spend
somewhere
versus
locking
people
into
your
service
like
on
uber
or
something
else
that
rewards
you
for
referring.
Somebody
so
I
think
we've
seen
you
know.
B
Their
referral
program
with
us
bet
is
one
of
the
big
big
reasons.
I
think
why
they've
gotten
so
much
popularity,
because
not
only
is
it
a
way
for
somebody
who's
referring
someone
else
to
make
a
bunch
of
money,
but
it
also
gives
the
person
who
uses
that
referral
link
some
real
value
in
this
case
with
us
bet
they
get
half
a
percent
less
house
edge
so
that
they're
slightly
more
likely
to
win
so
I
could
definitely
see
some
kind
of
referral
program
being
linked
in
to
this.
Maybe
they
get
you
or
I.
A
There
were
a
URI
and
if
it
was
not
exactly
4%
like
if,
if
the
PayPal
incentive
is
like
five
to
ten
bucks,
if
we're
talking
about
the
current
market
crap
market
cap
of
Oz
and
distributing
it
with
whatever
percent
they
decide
on
it,
it
probably
wouldn't
be
that
much
money
per
account.
I,
don't
know
the
exact
math,
but
you
wouldn't
be
getting
rich
off.
Of
this
I
mean.
B
I
mean
even
if
even
if
yes
is
it
a
trillion
dollar
markup
I,
don't
think
anybody
would
necessarily
be
rich.
It
may
be
to
the
point
where
you
know
you're
getting
a
couple
thousand
dollars
a
year
off
of
it,
but
you're,
certainly
not
going
to
you
know,
become
a
millionaire
just
sitting
back
collecting
your
URI,
so
it'll
be
interesting.
But
if
you
tell
somebody
hey
sign
up
for
this
new
Facebook
you're
gonna
get
four
grand
a
year
just
for
for
sitting
there,
you're
gonna
have
a
billion
people
knocking
at
your
doorstep,
ready
to
do
it.
B
A
I,
don't
expect
it
to
be
four
grand
at
all,
but
eventually
maybe
it
maybe
it
will
be.
Who
knows
yeah,
but
the
other
thing
to
consider
is
like
we
were
talking.
It
felt
like
money
was
being
in
a
way
from
from
you
if
a
uri
was
enacted,
but
that
that's
assuming
that
the
4%
inflation
is
actual
inflation
or
if
the
deflationary
mechanisms
built
in
the
eos
offset
that
4%
right.
B
I
mean
right
now:
the
ramp
trading
fees
are
something
like
I
think.
It's
technically
I
mean
it's
a
1%
ramp
trading
fee,
but
it's
doing
because
there's
more
ram
actually
being
traded
than
you
know,
rewards
being
paid
to
block
producers.
I
think
it's
like
one
point.
Two
percent
so
use
this
negative
point:
two
percent
inflation-
don't
quote
me
on
that
that
might
be
a
little
off,
but
they're
actually
less
than
a
billion
u.s.
tokens
that
exist.
B
Now,
if
you
don't
count,
the
worker
proposal
fund
and
things
like
that
that
can't
be
accessed
yet
and
likely
will
never
be
accessed,
it'll
just
be
burned
and
then
we'll
start
over
fresh
with
1%
is
actually
less
than
a
billion.
So
it
is
deflationary.
Currently
4%,
though,
would
be
much
much
harder
to
offset
than
than
1%,
but
that.
A
A
If
that's
gonna
be
such
a
used
tool
like
Ram
trading
right
now
is
mostly
just
speculators,
because
there's
not
a
whole
lot
adapts
out
that
actually
in
need
of
it,
but
as
the
ecosystem
grows,
we're
gonna
have
more
and
more
DAPs
that
have
to
basically,
they
might
have
so
many
tokens
staked,
but
then
anytime
they're
coming
close
to
their
computation
limit
in
on
their
smart
contract.
It's
gonna
have
to
automatically
tap
into
the
recs
and
and
extra
CPU,
hey
man,
there's
gonna,
be
a
1%
fee
at
least
associated
with
that
I
would
assume
I
would.
B
You
know
return
on
staking
your
Oh,
some
leasing
it
out
to
DAP
developers
in
the
long
term
you
can
make
5%
a
year
in
inflation
is
5%.
You
can
virtually
offset
inflation
personally
for
yourself.
If
you
choose
to
lease
out
your
token
power,
which
is
a
really
interesting
concept,
so
those
that
are
sort
of
leasing
back
into
the
network
continuing
to
stake
their
tokens,
maybe
continue
to
vote
for
producers
are
the
ones
that
won't
really
be
a
violation
and.
A
I
I
guess
my
other
argument
for
I.
Don't
know
if
I'm
for
the
URI
but
I
guess
and
it's
an
argument
for
it
is
that
I
think
that
the
inflation,
whatever
it's
set
out,
whether
it's
four
percent
five
percent
III,
think
it's
going
to
actually
like
I
think
you
just
said
it
would
be
it'd,
be
like
a
one
or
two
percent
inflation.
A
But
the
the
thing
to
consider
is
that
a
URI
would
make
the
pie
so
much
bigger
each
year,
in
the
token
value
that,
even
if
you
have
a
smaller
percent,
if
you
converted
it
to
USD,
you
might
actually
have
more.
So
would
you
rather
have
five
percent
of
a
hundred
dollar
pie
or
two
percent
of
a
thousand
dollar
pie?
B
A
B
O'clock
here
in
London,
where
five
hours
ahead,
so
that
that's
been
the
biggest
thing
honestly
adjusting
to
London
that
the
people
have
been
great
svk
crypto,
that
the
whole
community
has
been
great
and
so
welcoming
and
meeting
everybody
here
that
part
of
the
heõs
community,
the
cryptic
community
in
general
has
just
been
ecstatic,
but
everything
else
has
been
pretty
rough
that
the
jetlag
my
girlfriend
came
with
me.
She's
been
sick.
The
whole
time
I've
been
you
know
as
well.
A
B
A
B
That's
pretty
much
it.
The
the
only
other
thing
I
would
say
is
that
if
you're
curious
what's
happening,
there's
obviously
a
lot
of
events
happening.
We
have
two
hackathon
this
weekend,
we
have
blockchain
live
next
week.
If
you
want
to
know
what's
happening,
you
want
to
know
our
thoughts
on
it.
Follow
us
both
on
Twitter
I
am
at
Centrify,
fi,
n,
CH,
ify
and.