►
From YouTube: Fil+ November 29, 2022 Notary Governance Call
Description
The November 29th community governance calls to discuss the Filecoin Plus program.
*There will be no Governance Call on December 27th
Slides and Links: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1u76UMQE1dYSV0jP4jKh9XPDvfikts6Qc98KxUyWHnfA/edit?usp=share_link
Agenda
4th Notary Election
- Verification of Organization (email)
- Dates and Deadlines
Proposals Discussions
790 - Increased LDN
If you would like to attend these meetings LIVE, the Fil+ Notary Governance calendar is available at: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=c_k1gkfoom17g0j8c6bam6uf43j0%40group.calendar.google.com&ctz=America%2FLos_Angeles
Follow Filecoin!
Website: https://bit.ly/3ndAg44
Twitter: https://bit.ly/3ObND0x
Slack: https://bit.ly/3HKfFy7
Blog: https://bit.ly/3HFZFNv
Reddit: https://bit.ly/39N4Jmv
Telegram: https://bit.ly/3bkP8Ly
Subscribe to our newsletter! https://bit.ly/3Oy8J9j
#filecoin #ipfs #libp2p #web3 #nft
A
A
We
have
one
new
proposal.
That's
in
we'll
talk
about
that
as
we
go
and
we
have
guest
speakers
with
KZ
and
RG
joining
us
and
they'll,
give
updates
from
their
working
groups
on
Enterprise
field
plus,
as
well
as
the
trust
and
transparency
after
that,
we'll
save
some
time
for
Community
discussion.
So,
there's
anything
on
your
mind
outside
of
the
topics
we've
talked
about,
you'll
have
a
chance
to
flag
that
for
the
group
and
we
had
one
LDN
prepare
a
video,
so
I
have
linked
that
in
the
slide.
A
Decks
we'll
invite
that
LDN
to
answer
any
questions
or
any
comments
that
may
want
to
share
that'll,
probably
take
us
right
up
sometime.
So
with
that,
let's
kind
of
kick
off
as
a
friendly
review.
We
are
your
governance
team,
we're
here
to
back
you
up
with
any
help
you
may
need
on
the
project.
It's
deep,
Galen,
myself,
RG,
Phil,
Simon
and
Casey.
A
I
should
probably
add
you
to
this,
because
you
are
definitely
one
of
us,
so
we
should
get
that
beautiful,
Enterprise
field
plus
going
through
here,
but
the
reason
why
we're
flagging
this
is,
if
you
need
help
with
the
specific
area,
it
really
goes
a
long
way
to
tag
the
person
that's
responsible
for
it.
If
I
get
tagged
on
an
LDN
application,
for
example,
all
I
can
do
is
really
plus
you
in
with
RG
or
Galen.
So
it's
really
helpful
if
you
do
need
specific
guidance
tag.
A
One
of
us,
if
you
tag
all
of
us
at
the
same
time,
actually
it
slows
the
process
down,
because
then
we
don't
know
who's
got
quarterback
to
help
you.
If
you
are
joining
this
call,
it's
really
really
helpful
and
actually
requested.
If
you
were
going
to
be
a
notary
and
you
have
an
SLA
greater
than
three
to
have
your
name
in
the
Box,
this
means
that
we
can
talk.
We
can
call
you
out
if
you
take
a
look
at
my
name
right
now.
A
It
says
Kevin
Dash,
the
company
that
I'm
affiliated
with
just
goes
a
long
way,
so
if
you're
dialing
in
from
a
phone
or
you're
dialing
in
from
your
organization,
just
right
click
on
your
name
and
then
that
way
on
the
screen,
recording
that
we
share
or
any
questions
we
can
actually
connect
who's.
Actually,
speaking
with
who
had
an
issue
goes
a
long
way
for
your
notaries
and
with
that
here
is
the
link
for
the
attendance,
those
of
you
that
are
signed
up
for
the
SLA
you'll
notice
link
very
well.
A
This
takes
you
to
our
air
table
I'm,
going
to
post
it
right
here
in
chat
and
when
you
follow
this
airtable
link.
This
just
lets
you
sign
in
say
what
session
you've
attended
and
then
we
can
Mark
you
down
for
your
participation
and
really
lock
that
in
so
thanks
again
for
everyone
who
signs
this
up
goes
a
long
way
all
right
with
that.
I
want
to
kind
of
a
soft
plug.
A
We're
going
to
have
speakers
today
to
talk
about
these
issues,
but
just
as
a
quick
reminder,
there
are
two
very
large
working
groups
that
are
doing
some
really
impactful
work
if
you're
interested
to
get
involved
with
those
and
dive
deeper
into
the
Phil
plus
program.
These
are
your
chances
to
do
that.
So,
in
this
slide,
deck
you'll
see
that
there's
some
ways
to
get
involved,
there's
the
links
and
as
a
quick
refresh
this
slide
deck
is
shared
on
slack
in
the
Phil
plus
channel.
A
So,
if
you'd
like
to
follow
along
or
get
these
links,
feel
free
to
check,
slack
and
you'll
see
the
links
to
this
deck
right
there
in
the
most
recent
plus
infill
plus,
but
essentially,
if
you've
signed
up
to
be
a
notary,
and
you
put
on
your
SLA
participation
that
you'd
like
to
be
an
LDN
three
or
more.
What
you're,
essentially
saying
is
you're
going
to
be
joining
one
of
the
groups
right
now.
A
These
are
the
two
main
groups,
so
you'll
be
joining
either
trust
and
transparency
to
make
sure
that
there's
some
accountability
and
RG
will
talk
about
this
or
Enterprise
fill
plus.
How
are
we
standardizing
these
systems
and
Casey
we'll
talk
more
about
that
on
the
call,
but
here's
all
the
information
again
and
we'll
keep
this
up
here
as
we
go
into
2023..
A
So,
with
that,
let's
talk
about
the
elections,
wow
wow,
wow,
129
applications
received.
This
is
a
big
one
like
we're
going
to
need
a
bigger
boat
one
so
in
the
third
round
of
Elections
I
believe
we
have
72
and
in
the
second
round
of
Elections
I,
believe
that
we
had
around
34
applications
that
come
through.
So
this
has
just
been
an
overwhelming
response
into
the
program
and
how
we're
kind
of
growing
and
looking
at
this
adoption
take
forth
so
129
applications.
A
A
So
what
that
means
is
that
any
applications
received
today
I've
seen
a
few
come
in
over
the
last
couple
of
days.
What
I'm
going
to
do
is
I'm
going
to
tag
them
with
this
round
five
notary
label,
and
essentially
what
this
says
in
GitHub
is
that
hey
we've
received
this
we'll
mark
this
and
we
do
the
next
election
sometime
in
2023.
We
will
pick
your
application
back
up,
so
there's
no
further
information
needed
from
you.
A
I
might
leave
a
friendly
comment,
just
letting
you
know
that
that's
the
case,
but
if
you
see
this
round
five
application,
it's
because
you
submitted
your
application
well
after
the
November
16th
deadline,
no
worries
on
that.
We'll
just
get
you
into
the
next
election
as
it
goes
forward
on
it.
Now.
Here's
what's
happening
now
for
all
of
you
that
have
your
applications
in
you
might
have
seen
a
comment
from
myself
or
Phil
come
through
last
week,
and
that
comment
was
asking
you
to
verify
your
contact
information.
Now.
This
does
two
things.
A
What
we're
asking
is
for
you
to
send
an
email
to
the
notary
election
at
phil.org
from
the
organization
that
you
represent,
so,
for
example,
if
I
turn
in
my
application
and
I
said:
hi
I'm
Kevin
from
filecoin
Foundation
I
should
send
an
email
to
this
notary
election
with
my
filecoin
Foundation
email.
Now,
if
there's
whatever
reason
you
don't
have
access
to
an
email
or
you
don't
have
that
connection,
we
will
not
be
able
to
verify
your
connection
to
that
organization.
A
We're
taking
this
as
like
just
the
first
line
of
transparency,
so
you
need
to
send
us
an
email
and
say:
hey
I,
don't
have
access
to
that
organization's
email
actually,
I!
Don't
think
that
I
would
qualify
as
representing
the
organization
as
a
result
and
what
we'll
do
is
we
can
modify
and
what
I
mean
by
that
is.
Some
of
you
have
asked
hey.
If
I
don't
represent
this
organization,
can
I
just
be
Kevin,
not
the
foundation,
and
to
do
that?
A
What
we'll
do
is
just
leave
a
comment
in
your
issue
and
say:
hey
I'm,
going
to
modify
my
application.
I
no
longer
wish
to
be
considered
an
organization
I'm.
Just
an
individual
so
again,
this
is
only
if
you
have
no
way
to
verify
your
connection
to
an
organization.
Otherwise,
just
an
email
from
your
organization
is
just
fine
to
show
your
ties,
your
current
connections
and
then
we'll
keep
forward
on
that
and
then
what
Phil
and
I
are
doing
is
in
the
scoring
process.
A
We're
doing
very
light
touch,
kyc
KYB,
we're
verifying
the
links
that
you
shared
we're
trying
to
find
any
updates
on
social
media
to
connect
you
to
that.
So
in
the
process.
If
we're
able
to
do
that
with
the
information
you
provided
thumbs
up,
nothing
else
needed
if
we
hit
a
roadblock
or
a
dead
end
or
something
just
clearly
doesn't
add
up
in
the
application.
That's
when
we
will
be
adding
a
comment
into
your
application.
Like
hey,
we
totaled
your
score.
It's
a
little
bit
lower
and
the
reason
for
the
low
scores.
A
We
couldn't
find
anything
we're
going
to
give
you
some
time
to
get
back
to
us
and
share
some
updates.
So
we'll
talk
about
that
next
on
the
call,
but
just
currently,
if
you
have
an
update
in
you,
should
have
got
this
email
verification.
If
you
haven't
done
so
already,
today
is
probably
the
last
day
that
we're
going
to
be
patient
with
kind
of
waiting
for
those
emails,
because
what
we're
doing
right
now
is
we're
actually
totaling
scores.
So
if
you
haven't
sent
that
email,
this
is
your
no
kidding
very
friendly.
A
Please
send
it
so
with
that
if
you
have
applied
and-
and
you
are
awaiting
to
become
a
notary,
my
high
strong
recommendation
is
that
you
should
begin
looking
at
your
Ledger
now.
So
in
order
to
have
your
Ledger,
you
have
to
have
a
physical
Ledger
to
participate
in
the
notary
program,
no
digital
ones.
So
that
means
some
of
you
that
might
have
restrictions
due
to
covid
or
might
have
restrictions
due
to
customs.
We've
heard
a
lot
of
this
in
the
third
round.
It
could
take
a
few
weeks
for
this
ledger
to
come
in.
A
So
if
you
have
turned
in
an
application,
if
you've
done
your
email
verification
steps,
there's
no
guarantee
you
will
be
accepted.
So
this
is
definitely
a
very
like
I'm,
leaning
forward
into
this,
with
the
assumption
that
may
or
may
not
be
in
the
program
but
I
highly
encourage
you
to
have
your
Ledger
set
up
and
the
reason
for
it
is
if
you
wait
until
you're
formally
selected,
November
9th
excuse
me
December
9th,
and
then
we
announce
hey
you've
been
selected
as
a
notary.
A
If
this
is
something
that
you're
going
to
pursue-
and
you
haven't
done
so
already-
please
please
please
look
at
ordering
that
ledger,
there's
actually
some
really
good
sales
right
now,
average
around
70,
80
U.S,
all
right!
So
here's
where
we
stand
as
far
as
next
steps
on
the
elections
completed
right
now,
we've
closed
GitHub,
filling
myself
I've
been
cleaning.
A
Those
up,
labeling
them
making
sure
everything's
clean
and
we've
been
migrating,
those
into
a
scoring
system,
and
what
we've
been
doing
right
now
is
asking
all
of
you,
as
I
said
earlier,
to
send
us
a
verification
of
your
contact
of
your
email,
we're
going
to
be
replying
back
with
a
token,
and
that
token
is
what
you
use
so
then
verify
your
slack.
So
your
GitHub
verifies
your
email.
Your
email
verifies
your
slack,
and
we
know
that
everything
is
one
individual
or
one
account.
What
we're
also
doing
right
now
is
we're
scoring
each
of
your
applications.
A
So
if
you
told
us
your
time,
stake
was
X
and
you
told
us
your
LDN
was
y.
We
total
these
numbers
and
we
spit
out
a
score
3.2
4.7
and
we're
going
to
be
then
linking
those
scores
in
your
applications.
Once
you
receive
those
scores,
this
is
going
to
happen
around
Friday.
We're
going
to
give
you
a
few
days
to
look
over
your
score,
and
this
means
if
we
come
back
and
we
say:
hey
Phil,
I,
think
you're
doing
great
here's
the
numbers
of
what
we
think
your
score.
A
Is
we
passed
you
as
a
3.6
based
off
all
the
metrics?
Is
there
anything
we're
missing
or
is
there
anything
else
you'd
additionally
like
to
share
this?
Is
your
chance
from
November
6th
through?
Excuse
me,
third,
through
the
6th
to
Echo
back
and
say:
oh
Kevin,
you
might
have
missed
this
link
or
hey
I.
Have
some
more
updates
for
you
and
really
kind
of
finalize
that
score,
and
then
what
we're
going
to
do
is
December
7th,
no
more
edits.
A
B
A
So
again,
if
you
have
any
questions
on
this,
I
know
that
you
do
please
please
use
the
public
slack
and
the
reason
why
I
say
this
is
because
what
happens
is
I
usually
get
10
15
of
the
same
question
that
comes
through
in
DMS.
Could
it
be
really
nice
if
we
could
shift
some
of
those
DM
questions
over
to
the
public
slack
I
know?
Sometimes
it's
the
tendency
of
like
well
I.
A
Don't
really
want
to
ask
in
these
large
rooms
and
I
respect
that
and
if
you
really
don't
feel
comfortable,
that's
why
I'm
here
and
I'll
always
support
you
with
that
DM.
But
if
you
do
feel
like
benefiting
to
the
public
cause
asking
in
these
slack
rooms-
oh
it's
just!
You
will
get
10
points
to
Gryffindor
and
a
high
five
virtually
from
me
for
asking
on
these,
because
that
way,
other
people
can
benefit
from
it.
So
any
questions
feel
free
to
DM.
A
It's
going
to
be
a
little
bit
slower
or
feel
free
to
hit
up
on
the
fill
plus
Channel.
So
here's
a
quick
check-in
on
where
we
stand
with
the
elections
right
now
we
are
doing
the
application
scoring
period.
It
runs
until
December
9th.
You
were
going
to
hear
back
from
us
around
the
third
or
the
fourth
with
your
score,
and
that's
going
to
give
you
a
few
days
to
list
any
comments
or
any
updates,
and
on
December
9th
we
will
be
updating
who
the
new
notary
is
selected
with
the
fourth
round.
A
After
that,
we're
going
to
be
setting
up
a
new
notary,
onboarding
program
showing
you
essentially
like
how
to
verify
how
to
run
trust
and
transparency,
how
to
communicate
some
of
just
the
getting
started,
steps
that
make
you
a
good
citizen
and
how
to
participate
so
we'll
announce
those
in
the
next
notary
governance
call
after
this
one
that's
coming
up.
So
with
that
I'll,
pause
and
I'll
see.
If
anybody
on
the
call
has
any
questions
about
the
timelines,
the
kyc
or
anything
in
the
process.
So
far,.
C
A
D
A
All
right,
if
you
guys
have
any
notary
questions
by
all
means,
please
feel
free
to
flag
we'll
have
more
time
at
the
end
of
this
call.
So
with
this
we
have
only
one
updated
proposal
that
came
through,
and
then
we
have
updates
from
the
two
working
groups,
so
maybe
I
introduce
790
RG
not
to
put
you
on
the
spot
too
much
but
I
know
since
Sunny
submitted
this
I
don't
see
her
on
the
call.
If
you
had
anything,
you
might
want
to
add
probably
go
a
lot
deeper
than
mine.
F
F
Of
course
questions
have
been
raised
that
you
know
this
might
be
this.
This
is
a
point
of
centralization
where
you
know
we're
sending
an
email
and
the
note
rates
are
taking
dependency
on
us
to
trust
us
us
being
the
governance
team
and
so
for
now.
I
think
the
the
what
we
wanted
to
do
is
have
all
clients
send
an
email
instead
of
like
nitpicking.
F
A
few
clients
you
send
the
email
and
eventually
what
we
want
to
do
is-
and
this
is
going
to
be
another
proposal
that
I'm
going
to
propose
is
that
we
want
clients
to
work
directly
with
notaries
and
send
emails
if
they
need
if
they
require
but
yeah
for
now.
I
think
this
is
basically
streamlining
the
process.
Where
will
the
the
proposal
is
asking
that
all
clients
need
to
do
KYB
up
front
so
that
all
notaries
have
access
to
that
information?
G
F
If,
if
you
were
to,
let's
say,
move
everything
to
a
one-to-one
relationship
between
the
the
notaries
and
the
client
but
they're
they're,
more
comfortable
sharing,
sending
an
email
from
their
official
email
but
they're
less
comfortable,
sharing
a
business
license
with
the
notaries,
so
yeah
I
think
that
is
something
we
need
to
think
about.
But
for
now
I
would
say
it
is
primarily
the
email
from
the
official
email
account
of
the
organization.
H
F
So
I
think,
of
course
you
know
if
the
notary,
if
the
client
sends
the
email
and
the
notary
says
that
yes,
the
email
has
been
received
and
I.
Think
in
that
case,
if
another
notary,
let's
say,
wants
proof
of
that
they
should.
They
have
complete
right
to
kind
of
ask
for
a
screenshot
right,
so
that
there's
no
collusion
between
no
recent
clients.
F
H
F
Yeah
and
I
I
personally,
think
that
you
know
I,
think
tanking.
A
dependency
for
being
the
source
of
Truth
in
this
case
is
not
a
very
sustainable
long-term
strategy
and
I
think
we
need
to
devise
ways
in
which
clients
can
do
KYB
and
kyc
directly,
with
the
notaries
or
through
other
third-party
apps.
Okay,.
I
I
The
first
bullet
point
there
is
so
far:
we've
had
14
clients
apply
for
the
pilots,
so
the
idea
was
that
SPS
would
bring
a
new
client
and
have
them
apply
and
work
through
the
the
application
process
that
we've
created
to
get
data
cap
supporting
their
their
private
data,
set
applications.
So
there's
a
link
here
on
the
on
the
slide.
It's
a
public
document
that
everyone
can
see
that
I'm
just
kind
of
listing
progress
of
all
the
applications,
so
you
can
look
at
their
application
in
the
LDN.
I
You
can
look
at
the
exceptions,
proposals
and
I'm
keeping
notes,
because
again,
this
is
a
pilot.
We're
learning
a
lot
in
terms
of
what's
required
to
to
have
a
really
trustworthy
application.
What
steps
need
to
be
taken
to
finalize
and
get
these
things
across
the
finish
line
so
feel
free
to
take
a
look
and,
and
obviously
use
this
as
a
template
for
those
of
you
that
are
that
are
getting
started
soon
with
e-fill
plus
this
will.
I
I
We
have
another
client
that
is
currently
in
the
final
step
waiting
approval,
so
two
notaries
have
been
Auto
assigned
and
they're
going
back
and
forth
right
now
to
get
the
information
they
need
for
the
approval,
and
we
actually
have
five
actually
now
six
Chinese
applicants
who
are
going
through
a
manual
KYB
process
and
it's
involving
looking
at
the
business
documentation
and
having
some
other
notaries
sort
of
sign
off
on
on
that
right
now,
but
that
that
leads
me
to
the
second
quick
update.
So
a
big
part
of
this
project
was
piloting.
I
You
know
a
new
solution
that
could
manage
kyc
know
your
customer
and
KYB
know
your
business
for
clients
and
unfortunately,
our
our
vendor
that
we've
chosen
right
now
is
unavailable
in
China
for
bank
checks.
So
we've
we've
done
some
troubleshooting
and
they're
working
through
that
I'm.
Actually
looking
at
other
other
vendors
and
I've
reached
out
to
the
working
group,
who's
been
very
supportive
and
helpful
in
providing
me
ideas
and
thoughts
for
how
to
produce
solutions
that
will
work
for
us,
so
ultimately,
I'd
love
to
have
more
than
one
solution.
I
That's
available
for
clients
to
choose
to
complete
this
process.
So
right
now
we're
going
through
some
some
steps
there,
but
moving
forward
positively
and
then
the
final
update
quickly
is
you
know.
A
big
part
of
this
pilot
was
to
take
away
a
lot
of
learning
and
be
able
to
create
iterations
on
this
project
that
we
can
roll
it
out
and
have
it
run
on
its
own
here,
probably
in
in
q1
next
year.
I
So
one
of
the
big
learnings
that
I'm
that
I'm
finding
with
the
applicants
every
applicant
so
far
has
been
applying
for
the
maximum
amount
that
they
can
of
data
cap
five
five
PB,
but
they
don't
actually
have
five
PVD
right.
So
when
I
ask
them,
how
big
is
your
data
set?
It's
a
little
bit
of
back
and
forth,
and
and
my
my
recommendation
is
for
everyone
that
is
applying
for
this
pilot
to
apply
for
Less
and
I
know.
I
That
seems
crazy,
because
most
people
think,
let's,
let's
get
what
we
we
can
get
and
then
we'll
be
set.
We
won't
have
to
go
through
this
process,
but
the
idea
behind
this
is
you're
applying
for
data
cap
in
general
and
you're
producing
a
trustworthy
application
through
your
first
allocations
of
data
cap
and
and
onboarding
of
data,
you'll
start
to
build
a
reputation
that
you're
doing
what
you
said.
You
were
going
to
do
in
your
application
and
then
further
allocations
will
become
a
lot
easier,
so
I'm
I'm
trying
to
build
that
mindset
into
the
applicants.
I
I
I
The
number
of
copies
the
SPs
involved,
the
IDS
the
locations,
so
this
has
been
a
little
bit
of
a
back
and
forth,
but
I
think
applicants
have
caught
on
to
this
and
and
the
realized
that
they're
they're,
adding
all
this
information
and
it's
just
making
a
complete
application
that
notaries
just
have
all
the
information
they
need
to
make
the
decision.
It
becomes
very
easy
Once.
You
have
all
this
set
up
and
then
the
final
bullet
point
I
have
is
oh
yeah,
so
SPS
are
adding.
I
You
know
a
list
of
of
SPS
that
are
being
included
in
this
in
these
projects,
but
they're
not
necessarily
signed
off
that
they're
involved
in
this
project.
So
this
is
something
we
need
to
think
through
moving
forward.
A
way
to
have
SPS
confirm
that,
yes,
my
name
is
on
this
application
as
part
of
a
I'm
going
to
store
a
copy
for
this.
I
This
client
and
I
confirm
that
I'm
going
to
store
a
copy
for
this
client,
because,
right
now
you
know
you
can
list
SPS,
but
it
doesn't
necessarily
mean
they
even
know
that
their
name
is
on
it.
I
found
one
case
of
that
so
far,
so
anyway,
great
learnings,
we're
moving
forward
positively
I
will
stop
there
I
think
a
few
people
might
have
questions
or
hands
up.
G
I
On
Amazon,
unfortunately,
unfortunately
I'm
not
I'm,
not
able
to
read,
read
the
minds
of
the
of
the
applicants
but
I
think
in
general,
even
for
non-etho
plus
applicants,
everyone
sort
of
focuses
on
applying
for
the
max
again
I
think
the
idea
is
they.
They
want
to
do
this
once
they
don't
want
to
have
to
worry
about
going
through
this
process.
I
But
so
my
idea
is
for
people
to
start
trusting
in
in
the
process
of
just
applying
for
data
cap
in
general,
building
a
strong
application,
building
a
strong
reputation
and
then
future
allocations
will
become
much
much
easier.
So
I
think,
through
this
pilot,
we're
going
to
start
building
that
idea
of
apply
for
what
you
need
and
you'll
be
able
to
get
more.
If
you
need
it,
that's
not
a
problem.
It's
you
know.
I
If
you
come
in
as
a
brand
new,
a
client
to
this
community
and
and
you
you
say,
hi
I'm,
XYZ
Corporation,
this
is
I.
Have
a
private
data
set
I
need
five
Pips!
Thank
you!
It's
it's
not
going
to
go!
Well!
It's
gonna!
You
know
it's
gonna,
take
a
lot
of
back
and
forth
before
you
get
even
close
to
that,
so
I
think
I,
think
clients
and
notaries
and
SPS
are
becoming
more
aware
and
smarter
of
of
this.
This
idea
so
I'm
hoping
it'll
change
some
some
Trends
and.
I
B
F
Sounds
good,
yeah,
I
think
the
way
I
want
to
do
this
is
I
want
to
keep
very
specific,
like
tooling,
based
updates
for
the
trusted
transparency
working
group
calls
that
happen
every
other
week
from
the
governance
calls.
So
if
you're
interested
in
that,
please
join
the
transparency.
Working
group
I
think
right
now.
I
just
wanted
to
Echo
some
of
the
things
that
I
have
shared
already
shared
in
the
in
different
channels.
F
So
the
first
one
was
a
pretty
extensive
update
that
I
shared
in
the
field
plus
Channel
and
and
the
notary,
Channel
and
a
few
other
channels.
So
this
update
is
regarding
how
we
are
trying
to
move
along
with
the
LDN,
Pipeline
and
kind
of
our
overall
approach
to
that.
So
you'll
see
that
a
lot
of
applications
are
now
being
triggered
and
the
trigger
is
not
a
sign
of
off
kyc
I
think
that
has
been
that.
F
So
again,
if
you
see
an
application
that
has
been
triggered,
don't
assume
that
the
kyc
has
been
done.
All
it
means
is
that
the
client
has
filled
out
the
application
completely
and
then
that's
the
basic
check.
We're
going
through
our
fraud.
Analyst
is
still
going
to
conduct
UIC
U.S
community
members
are
so
welcome
to
conduct
UIC
KYB.
Ask
questions.
Ask
hard
questions
on
those
applications
so
that
we
can
hold
both
the
client
and
the
notaries
signing
those
applications
accountable.
F
I
think
this
came
up
came
about
when
I
was
talking
when
I
was
reviewing
a
few
applications
that
had
a
multi-part
application,
which
basically
means
that
they're
applying
for
more
than
five
Pips
and
so
I
saw
that
they
were
using
different
client
addresses
and
when
I
reached
out
to
the
client
or
the
clients.
In
this
case
they
said
that,
oh,
like
they
thought
that
the
rule
is
that
they
need
to
use
a
different
client
address
for
each
application.
F
But
after
doing
my
own
kind
of
q,
a
I,
don't
think
I
haven't
found
any
written
rule
that
that's
ever
been
the
case.
So
I
think
this
was
set
as
a
precedence
by
some
previous
applications,
but
I
think
I
would
I
would
I
would
recommend
all
clients
to
use
a
diff.
The
same
client
address
if
you're
applying
for
a
multi-part
application.
F
This
is
directly
helpful
in
the
tooling
that
we're
building
for
CA,
tracking
and
and
kind
of
relationship
mapping
all
the
tools
that
we're
building
on
the
interest
raspberry
C
front.
So
if
we
do
find
clients
using
different
light
addresses
either
they
need
to
have
a
really
good
reasoning
for
why
they're
doing
that
or
notreach
will
be
flagging.
Those
applications
and
that's
kind
of
the
guideline
that
we'll
be
pushing
out.
F
There
was
a
client-
and
this
is
an
application
number
975,
where
the
client
had
given
out
the
first
tranche
to
a
single
SP
and
their
kind
of
reasoning
is
that
oh,
we'll
give
out
the
rest
of
the
tranche
to
distribute
the
rest
of
the
trunches.
This
isn't
kind
of
like
targeting
this
client,
but
what
I
wanted
to
have
a
discussion
about
is
is:
is
it
okay,
if
the
first
charge
that
a
client
receives
is
given
out
to
a
single
SP
because
they
are
according
to
them?
F
They
are
kind
of,
like
you
know,
testing
things
out
and
they're.
Let's
say
this
is
the
first
time
this
is
the
first
time
the
client
is
participating
in
development
plus
ecosystem,
and
then
we
know
their
behavior
over
time.
Seeing
that,
oh,
are
they
like
allocating
the
the
subsequent
tranches
and
distributing
them,
or
do
you
think
we
should
flag
that
as
kind
of
inconsistent
behavior
and
breaking
the
rules
of
the
field
plus
program
right
away?
F
So
the
basic
rule
is
that
you
know
we.
We
of
course
recommend
that
you
don't
store
more
than
25
of
the
replicas
with
a
single
SP.
Now
that's
kind
of
like
the
broad
rule
right
and
but
like
the
argument
the
client
is
making.
Is
that
oh,
like
that
applies
to
like
the
all
the
replicas
right?
So
in
this
case
they
want
to
received,
let's
say
less
than
five
percent
of
the
total
and
so
less
than
five
percent.
F
Let's
say
when
you,
when
less
than
five
percent
is
with
the
with
the
with
one
SP
but
down
the
line,
they
will
eventually
distribute
the
data
cap
in
a
way
that
it
will
be
not
more
than
25
percent
right,
but
I
think
the
question
here
is:
should
that
rule
apply
to
each
tranche?
So
should
we
say
that
each
tranche
should
go
to
should
not
be
allocated
to
1sp
and
should
be
distributed?
You
know
or
is
it
are?
F
We
should
should
be
like
the
total
amount
of
data
cap
that
they've
applied
for,
and
this
is
something
I
think
it's
worth
a
discussion,
because
yeah
I
think
it's
not
kind
of
like
you
know,
set
it
out
whatever
and
we
don't
have
to
like.
You
know,
come
to
a
conclusion
today,
of
course,
but
I
just
wanted
to
flag
this,
and
if
you
are
interested
I'll,
be
posting
an
update
regarding
this
in
the
trust
and
transparency
group.
A
Well,
I
think
the
last
update
for
just
general
Community
awareness
is
the
schedule
for
the
rest
of
2022.,
my
goodness
the
year
is
done.
It
just
got
started.
So
today
is
the
29th
in
my
time
zone
of
November
just
flagging
for
all
of
you
that
there
is
one
more
call
in
2022
and
that's
going
to
take
place
on
December
13th
as
scheduled.
No
changes,
governance
call
time
as
scheduled,
but
the
call
on
the
27th.
We
are
postponing
that
due
to
the
holiday
break
here
in
the
states.
A
So
you
will
see
that
schedule
removed
from
your
shared
calendar.
I
want
to
put
this
on
the
radar
for
everybody
now
whole
month
in
advance
that
the
notary
governance
call
on
December
27th
will
be
postponed
and
it
will
resume
regularly
scheduled
after
the
two-week
break
in
January.
So
the
last
time
we
will
connect
again
is
December
13th
with
that.
So
you'll
see
that
represented
no
action.
Your
calendars
will
auto
update
if
you're
following
the
notary
governance.
A
H
H
Then
the
second
one
is
if
the
first
allocation
is
very
small,
I
think
it's
probably
okay
to
not
have
the
full
list
of
SPS
that
all
receive
views,
but
everything
goes
to.
One
SP
seems
big
extreme,
such
as
the
nas
N5
and
number
three
is
there
are
cases
that,
in
the
LDN
application,
the
client
only
list
they're
trying
to
find
SPS
to
work
with
rather
than
list
like
more
than
five
or
more
than
four
asps
that
they
already
contacted.
H
F
H
F
I.
Think
50
tips
seems
a
lot
right.
If
you
give
out
to
a
single
SP
to
say:
hey
we're
just
testing
out,
you
know,
understanding
the
ceiling
process
and
whatnot.
So
I
think
that
is
worth
a
discussion
and
finally
I
think
for
the
third
one
I
think
I
just
want
to
get
a
clarification
on
this
one.
So
do
you
mean
that
clients
say
that
you
know
they're
in
the
process
of
finding,
but
they
don't
list
all
the
SPs
their
their
work,
their
plan
to
work
with
or
yeah.
B
F
Yeah
I
think
on
that
I
mean
we've
I.
Think
I've
had
in-person
discussions
on
this
one
with
different
clients.
You
know
in
Singapore
and
all
these
different
events
that
we've
had
in
Lisbon
and
I
think
a
lot
of
the
clients
say
that,
especially
if
this
is
the
first
time
they're
applying
they
end
up
using
like
bde
or
other
platforms
or
finding
SPS
after
they
get
data
cap.
F
But
I
think
some
of
these
issues
should
be
ironed
out
as
we're
like
moving
towards
deal
engines
but
also
I.
Think
it's
a
bit
challenging
from
my
understanding
and
you
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
that
it's
a
bit
difficult
for
clients
to
kind
of
get
like
a
agreement
with
SPS
up
front.
So
I
don't
know
what
the
best
solution
here
is.
F
If
we
can
get
like
con,
if
you,
if
you're
suggesting
that
we
should,
like
all
clients,
need
to
have
the
list
of
SPS
up
front
before
they
did
before
they
get
data
cap,
that
is
something
I
I,
don't
believe.
That
is
something
we
can
enforce
because
you
know
just
the
way
at
least
personally
I
think
about
your
Marketplace.
F
Think
those
we
can
do
those
randomized
checks
once
the
tranches
are
happening
and
I
think
those
are
some
of
the
things
that
we're
hoping
to
do
with
the
CID
Checker
bot
that
I
shared
yesterday
in
the
trusted
transparency
working
group
with
the
root
Focus
watch
and
some
of
these
tools
that
we're
building
to
see
that
you
know
to
hold
the
client
accountable
in
this
case,
but
yeah.
If
you
have
any
specific
suggestions
or
other
suggestions,
how
we
can
hold
them
accountable,
I
would
love
to
hear
them.
G
Yeah,
what
when
they
show
AC
with
knowing
it
in
the
SP
addresses
before
having
the
data
Gap?
Is
that
it's
it
like,
like
I,
just
said
it's
kind
of
hard
to
go
after
SPS
or
go
after
do
business
development,
work
and
and
whatnot.
When
you
don't
have
the
data
cap
and
you
get
clients,
you
get
speeds,
you
get
everyone,
and
then
you
you
have
the
risk
of
not
getting
their
kept
in
time
and
then
you
lose
client.
You
lose
like
you
lose
all
the
the
pipeline.
You
were
thinking
about
and
were
working
with.
G
G
I
can
see
a
risk
of
actually
losing
the
whole
factoring
project
organization.
If
we
are
not
careful
enough
with
that,
so
my
suggestion,
if,
if
there's
there's
no
work
being
done
for
this
yeah,
this
should
actually
move
from
the
Falcon
project
organization
to
a
separate,
separate
organization
in
GitHub
to
deal
with
the
applications
and
whatnot
and
work
for
medium
to
long
term
solution
that
is
outside
of
GitHub
and
using
GitHub
only
as
a
platform
for
data
storage
and
like
public
sourcing
and
whatnot,
but
not
as
the
main
platform
we
use
to
do
everything.
G
We
do
it's
a
risk
for
the
Falcon
project
organization
and
it's
a
risk
for
ourselves
as
well,
because
if,
if
everything
goes
down,
we
we
have
a
lot
of
Turbo
with
actually
running
the
program
and
and
it
actually
can
hit
pretty
hard,
the
five
coin
itself.
So
that's
when
you
show
I'm,
seeing
and
I
would
like
to
erase
that
that
risk
just
yeah
sort
of
try
and
get
some
some
eyes
on
this.
A
Yeah
I
think
I
could
jump
on
that.
One
plus
one
I
think
what
we're
saying
is
GitHub
is
good,
not
great
I
think
we've
flagged
all
the
issues,
I
would
say
if
you
feel
that
way,
please
write
a
proposal
in
the
notary
governance
repo
here
under
the
issues
and
just
kind
of
spell
out.
What
are
you
seeing?
What
are
you
proposing
and
that
way
we
can
kind
of
take
it
from
this
conversation
level
to
maybe
put
in
some
more
action
plans
in
place,
so
I
think
yeah.
We
definitely
are
looking
at
this.
A
F
Go
ahead.
Sorry,
just
I
want
to
add
one
point:
there
I
think
a
lot
of
times.
We
end
up
in
the
discussion.
Being
that
oh,
like
GitHub,
isn't
good
need
to
find
another
platform.
I
think
we
at
least
I
haven't
seen
kind
of
like
a
list
of
issues
that
are
kind
of
like
why
GitHub
isn't
good
right,
I
think
what
let's
say
you
know
tomorrow
we
decide
to
build
another
platform
and
we
were
kind
of
coming
up
with
a
bunch
of
requirements
of
what
what
needs
to
be
fixed,
I.
F
Think
what
you
know
if
a
Community
member
is
writing
a
proposal.
I
think
it'll
be
really
good
to
see.
Okay.
This
is
why
it
doesn't
work
for
clients.
This
is
why
it
doesn't
work
for
SPS.
This
is
why
it
doesn't
work,
for
you
know,
notaries
and
then
I
think
we
can
see
if
in
this,
in
the
medium
term,
we
can
even
like
try
to
fix
that
through
Bots
or,
like
you
know,
some
other
channels
and
then
really
I
think
it
also
helps
to
make
a
stronger
argument
to
invest
into
a
separate
platform.
F
G
Yeah,
just
just
a
note
before
Carol
I
get
here.
So
my
main
issue
here
that
that
I'm
trying
to
raise
is
not
regarding
the
feature
set
of
GitHub
and
it's
more
like
in
terms
of
the
terms
of
service
and
and
like
getting
actually
a
banned
from
the
whole
organization
or
our
clients
banned
from
the
platform.
It's
not
about
the
feature
itself.
So.
A
I
think
what
we'll
do
in
the
interest
of
time,
good
discussion,
I
think
this
is
why
I'm
sorry
to
bring
it
back,
GitHub
works.
So
if
you
want
to
make
that
proposal,
let's
take
this
conversation
in
there
and
I
see
the
hand
that
just
pop
up
that'd
be
great
Cara.
If
you
want
to
follow
that
up
in
the
interest
of
time,
just
to
get
you
out
of
here
and
not
keep
anybody
late,
I
just
shared
the
link
for
the
sign
up
sheet.
A
If
you
came
late,
please
take
a
moment
and
fill
that
out
and
we
had
one
high
LDN
that
presented
their
application.
There
was
actually
two
that
came
back.
There
looks
to
be
some
kind
of
technical
difficulty,
so
heropant.
If
you're
on
the
call
when
I
follow
this
link,
it
doesn't
take
me
to
your
LDN
application,
so
I'm
going
to
follow
you
up
again,
and
then
we
can
kind
of
go
with
that
on
that,
so
beagle
toss,
if
you're
on
the
call
right
now
or
anybody
from
the
design
organization
the
floor
is
yours.
A
J
Hey
yeah
I
would
like
to
go
with
Alexandra's
topic,
so
I
remember
a
long
time
ago
we
were
talking
about
how
many
accounts
got
flagged
by
GitHub
and
everything
and
back
at
the
time
we
had
exactly
the
same
talk
about
it
if
we
should
switch
if
I
come
to
a
different
platform,
but
I
super
agree
with
what
kind
of
have
said
it's
it's
such
a
long
run.
It
there's
no
way
it
can
be
done
in
short
term.
So
yeah,
that's
that's
gonna
be
hard.
Just.
A
To
be
respectful
of
schedule
and
time,
let's
put
a
pin
in
the
GitHub
discussion
and
then
we
can
have
alessandre.
If
you
want
to
make
that
proposal
in
GitHub
repo
and
kind
of
outline
it,
we
can
carry
that
conversation
forward
and
then
just
again,
if
anyone
from
saline
Design
This
is
your
chance.
The
floor
is
yours.
If
you
want
to
kind
of
cover
anything
on
your
LDN
application
for
the
time.
A
K
K
E
A
All
right,
well
with
that,
the
next
call
we
have
is
going
to
kick
off
at
1800
Pacific.
The
calendar
updates
are
good
to
go
and
it
is
always
as
a
reminder
if
there's
any
topics
or
any
agenda
items,
I
make
these
issues
I
try
to
put
these
up
as
quickly
after
the
most
recent
calls.
So
you'll
see
the
next
one
going
up
for
December
really
shortly.
A
If
there's
anything
you
want
to
have
dedicated
time
on
the
agenda,
this
is
the
best
way
to
do
it
and
one
very
final,
just
friendly
check-in
reminder
there
will
be
no
call
on
December
27th.
So
with
that.
Thank
you
all
for
coming.
I'll
hang
out
here
for
just
a
moment
and
looking
forward
to
seeing
you
in
slack
and
the
next
call
coming
up
cheers
everyone.
H
G
A
A
Hello,
everybody
Welcome
to
the
second
notary
governance
call
of
November
29th.
My
name
is
Kevin.
Let's
take
a
quick
look
at
what
we
have
planned
for
tonight.
This
is
going
to
be
a
mere
call
of
what
happened
in
the
morning
with
just
a
little
bit
of
difference
in
participation
and
input
that
comes
through
so,
if
you're,
watching
on
YouTube.
This
should
be
the
the
same
clip
that
you
just
saw
for
those
of
you
joining.
We
usually
start
this
call
with
just
some
clerical
kick-ins.
We
kind
of
go
over
how
we
communicate.
A
A
What's
going
to
be
happening
next,
as
far
as
steps
go
and
then
really
kind
of
like
circling
back
on
that
process
and
high
level
details,
so
you're
all
tracking,
what's
going
on,
we
have
one
new
proposal,
we'll
talk
about
what
that
means
for
the
ldns
and
just
flag.
This
so
it's
on
your
radar
and
then
we
have
updates
from
the
two
working
groups
KZ
presented
this
morning,
for
the
trust.
A
Excuse
me
for
the
Phil
plus
I'll
cover
in
his
absence
tonight,
and
then
RJ
will
speak
to
the
trust
and
transparency
and
just
like
the
morning,
if
we
have
any
extra
time,
we'll
have
some
open
issues
that
you
may
want
to
bring,
and
we
have
two
ldns
that
prepared
videos,
so
if
they're
on
the
call
we'll
give
them
some
time
to
present
theirs.
So
with
that,
let's
Dive
In,
this
is
our
friendly
governance
team,
Galen,
myself,
RG
Phil
Simon.
A
We
are
here
in
very
specific
assets
to
back
you
up
for
whatever
you
need
within
the
field
plus
program.
The
reason
we
keep
bringing
this
slide
up
is
As.
The
program
increases
the
volume
and
size
we
have
begun
to
specialize.
There
used
to
be
a
day
where
you
could
just
ping
the
Galen
deep
myself,
and
then
that
would
be
just
a
blank
at
all.
Now,
we've
really
asked
if
you
need
help
with
like
a
client
onboarding,
please
go
to
Simon.
If
you
need
help
with
trust
and
transparency,
RG
can
help
with
that.
A
So
the
more
that
you
specifically
tag
the
more
we
will
be
able
to
help
you
faster.
It's
actually
a
reverse
incentive.
If
you
tag
all
of
us
and
like
please
help,
and
we
will
just
assume
that
somebody
else
is
going
to
do
it
and
not
back
you
up
so
please
hit
us
where
we
could
make
the
most
impact
for
you
as
we
go.
If
you're
joining
this
call
love
it
I
see
that
we
have
over
25
members
on
the
call
right
now
more
jointed
as
it
goes
through.
Can
you
please
do
two
things?
The.
A
So,
if
you're
on
the
call
right
now,
we
have
not
begun
with
the
new
SLA,
but
those
of
you
who
have
turned
in
a
notary
application
you're
very
well
aware
that
if
you're
going
to
list
yourself
as
an
L5,
we're
asking
that
when
you
join
these
calls,
you
join
with
your
name,
your
organization,
as
well
as
your
camera
on.
So
we
can
kind
of
have
more
of
a
I
guess.
A
A
If
you're
new
and
joining
we
distribute,
this
airtable
form
I'm
going
to
drop
it
right
here
and
chat
for
us
all
right
now
and
what
this
airtable
form
does
is
it
has
a
sign
up
sheet,
so
you
can
Mark,
hey
I
came
to
this
meeting
and
then
that
way,
when
we
come
back
and
we
start
putting
these
points
into
the
leaderboard
or
for
SLA
participation,
this
is
how
we
pull.
So,
if
you
come
to
these
calls,
please
fill
this
form
out.
This
is
the
source
of
truth.
It's
in
chat
right
now.
A
It's
ready
for
you
to
go
through
it.
So
again
that
link
is
in
chat,
go
ahead
and
fill
out
that
SLA
form
and
get
your
credit
for
coming.
So
with
that
yeah,
let's
take
a
look.
We
have
two
workouts
I'm
gonna
mute
you
right
there
again
if
you're
on
the
call,
please
don't
unmute
and
we
have
two
working
groups
that
are
going
right
now:
trust
and
transparency.
This
is
led
by
RG
and
the
second
working
group
is
Enterprise
fill
plus.
A
This
is
led
by
KZ
and
essentially
what
these
two
working
groups
are
and
they're
going
to
talk
again
on.
This
call
is
they're
looking
for
people
that
want
to
get
involved
and
participate
to
make
the
program
a
little
bit
more
effective
and
a
little
bit
deeper
in
these
two
facilities.
So
RG
is
going
to
give
us
an
update
on
trust
and
transparency
later
on
in
this
call,
KZ
prepared
some
slides
I'll
talk
in
his
absence
later
on
this
call,
but
if
you're
curious
to
get
involved,
this
is
where
the
links
are.
A
This
is
where
they
meet.
This
is
a
quick
overview
of
kind
of
their
main
mission
drivers
and,
if
you're
looking
for
this
slide
deck
that
I'm
sharing
on
the
screen
right
now
and
you're
on
this
call
live.
If
you
pop
over
to
slack
in
the
Phil
plus
Channel
you'll,
see
that
this
slide
deck
is
linked
in
that
friendly
reminder
that
I
dropped
20
minutes
ago
that
we
call
us
so
feel
free
to
feel
along.
A
All
the
links
are
in
that
slime
deck
all
right
notary
elections,
but
the
notary
elections,
hey
deep
RG
can
I
ask
your
help.
We
have
a
lot
of
unmutes
on
the
call
tonight.
If
you
hear
a
mic
pop
off,
can
you
help
me
with
the
mutes
I?
Don't
know
what's
going
on,
but
I'd
really
appreciate.
The
backup
is
moving
thanks.
Danny
I'm,
Gonna
Make
You
co-host.
If
you
wouldn't
mind
too,
if
you're
anybody
that
needs
I
appreciate
that
thanks
all
right,
we
had
an
overwhelming
number
of
applications
come
through.
This
was
really
awesome.
A
We
had
a
129
applications
come
through
and
why
this
was
like
wow.
This
is
really
awesome
is
because,
during
the
third
election
we
had
around
70
applications
come
through
back
in
the
second
election
we
had
around
25
30.
and
then
before
that,
what
we're
seeing
is
like
just
this
doubling
as
the
program
goes
through,
which
is
fabulous.
The
reason
why
we
like
this
is
because
we
can
be
a
little
bit
more
selective
on
individuals
that
are
really
going
to
make
that
commitment
really
stepping
into
this
program.
So
those
of
you
that
have
applied.
Thank
you.
A
We're
really
looking
forward,
as
we
start
going
through
and
scoring
your
applications
we're
going
to
kind
of
talk
about
where
that
process
is
now
in
the
call.
So
here's
where
we
are
from
a
time
frame
standpoint
the
deadline
to
submit
your
application
for
the
fourth
round
is
now
closed.
It
closed,
November,
16th
and
what
we
are
doing
right
now
is.
We
are
scoring
all
of
the
applications
that
have
been
received,
which
means
if
anyone,
if
you
submit
an
application
now
what
I'll
do
is
I'll
still
receive
it
and
I'll
leave
a
comment
on
your
issue.
A
Hey
thanks
for
submitting
this.
It's
been
received
and
I'm
going
to
put
a
tag
I'm
going
to
close
it
I'm
going
to
tag
fifth
round
notary,
because
you've
missed
the
deadline
for
this.
We
will
just
hold
your
application
in
your
interest
until
the
next
notary
elections
announced,
we
haven't,
set
a
timeline,
but
if
I
had
to
guess
it's
probably
going
to
be
in
Q2
2023.
A
So
again,
if
you
applied
after
the
deadline,
we
will
just
hold
your
application
as
it
goes
through
and
again,
if
you're
already
in
existing
notary,
you
did
not
have
to
reapply,
but
by
reapplying
you're,
taking
these
additional
steps
to
not
only
re-up
your
data
cap,
but
also
participate
in
the
second
rounds
of
kyc.
So
any
updates,
that's
only
available
to
newer
notaries
will
also
be
available
to
you
as
well.
A
Now,
what's
going
on
in
progress,
what
Phil
and
I
are
doing?
Is
we
left
a
comment
for
each
application
in
GitHub
and
that
comments?
What
I
have
on
the
screen?
Now
you
might
have
seen
it
I've
got
responses
from
dozens
and
dozens
and
dozens
of
you
and
what
we're
doing
is
we're
trying
to
verify
the
GitHub
application
to
the
contact
information
of
the
individual
or
the
organization.
A
So
what
we've
asked
is
that
if
you've
turned
in
an
application
to
become
a
notary
that
when
you
get
this
comment,
you
have
seen
it
because
you
were
responding
to
githubs
and
you
have
been
sent
an
email
to
this
address
notary-election
at
bill.org,
and
you
said
yes,
my
name
is
Kevin.
I
represent
the
filecoin
foundation,
and
here
is
my
email
and
your
email
should
then
correspond
to
the
organization
that
you
were
affiliated
with
I've
been
pinged
by
some
of
you
and
just
to
answer
this
publicly.
A
What
happens
if
I
turn
in
an
application
and
I
said
I
was
affiliated
with
an
organization,
but
after
consideration
or
I,
don't
have
access
to
their
email.
I
might
wish
to
just
downplay
become
an
individual
that
is
A-Okay.
What
we
will
do
is
just
add
a
comment
on
your
issue
and
we'll
also
identify
this
in
the
scoring,
if
you're
unable
to
authenticate
to
your
organization
and
what
you'll
do
is
you'll
just
represent
yourself
and
not
the
organization
which
means
you'll
score
off
yourself,
so
this
could
be
stake.
Exposure.
This
could
be
time
in
program.
A
This
could
be
social
media
presence.
You
might
have
a
different
score.
Had
you
been
an
organization
that
was
much
higher
than
if
you
were
an
individual
and
just
using
your
own,
which
is
why
we
made
the
decision
to
ask
for
this
verification
step
early
to
make
sure
that
we
were
scoring
accurately
so
again
when
you're
writing
back
to
us.
B
A
Great
question
I
appreciate
you
raising
this.
Yes,
what
we're
doing
right
now
is
we're
still
processing
all
of
the
applications
and
emails
that
come
through
you'll
be
receiving
that
code,
probably
tomorrow,
since
it's
already
around
1800
here
at
the
Pacific
time
zone
and
what
that
will
be
is
you'll
get
an
email
back
to
the
email
that
you
sent
and
it
will
say.
A
And
block
block
maker
looks
like
you
have
the
same
question
in
chats
just
to
answer
your
question.
I
will
be
writing
you
back
from
the
same
email
that
bill
notary,
so
you'll
get
an
email
back
from
the
foundation.
It'll
have
your
code
as
well
as
the
directions
on
how
to
message
us
on
slack,
so
any
problems
feel
free
to.
Let
me
know
I'm
here,
for
you.
A
So
if
you
wait
until
you're,
officially
selected
into
the
notary
group
after
the
November,
excuse
me
December,
9th
time
frame,
what
may
happen
is
when
you
order
your
notary.
Excuse
me
your
note
order
your
Ledger.
It
has
not
arrived
yet,
which
means
you
won't
be
able
to
onboard
with
the
rest
of
your
cohort.
It
means
you
won't
be
able
to
take
those
first
steps
and
it
means
you
won't
be
able
to
approve
applications.
So
this
is
a
strong
recommendation
to
order
your
Ledger
and
have
your
physical
Ledger
in
hand.
A
Now
we
can't
guarantee
that
you
will
be
accepted
as
a
notary,
but
what
I
can
tell
you
is
that
if
you
are
accepted
and
then
you
wait
till
that
deadline
to
then
order
your
Ledger,
it's
going
to
put
you
a
few
weeks
behind
everybody
else,
and
that
may
put
you
in
a
pit
with
that
SLA
in
participation
that
really
kind
of
drags
behind.
So
in
the
slide
deck
it's
The
Ledger
that
we've
worked
well
with
in
the
past.
A
It's
on
sale,
Black,
Friday,
I,
don't
know
if
that's
still
carrying
forward
on
Cyber
Monday,
but
just
the
big
talking
point
on
this
one.
If
you
haven't
done
so,
please
please
please
order
your
Ledger
you'll
be
happy
that
you
have
it
foreign
all
right.
So
here's
what
happens
next
already
completed
is
that
we've
gone
through
and
we've
labeled
all
of
your
applications
in
GitHub.
So
you
know,
we've
received
it.
You
know
we're
on
it
once
that
label
is
done,
you
can
kind
of
sit
back.
A
The
paper's
turned
in
what
we're
doing
right
now
is
we're
letting
the
final
emails
come
into
us.
So
everyone
who
is
verifying
their
steps
the
day
was
the
the
last
date
that
we're
going
to
be
like
very
patient
with
that
and
now
what
we're
doing
Phil
and
I
is.
We
are
scoring
each
one
of
the
applications
that
came
through
so
you'll
know
that
there's
the
rubric
on
how
we
look
at
this,
it's
very
public.
What
we
do
is
in
your
application,
if
you
say
hey
I'm,
going
to
be
an
SLA
participation
L3.
A
We
give
you
the
points
for
that.
If
your
stake
exposure
is
10
000
coins,
we
give
you
the
points
for
that
and
what
we
do
is
we
make
all
of
these
points
in
this
spreadsheet
and
then
once
we've
completed
that
score,
we
will
then
share
that
score
in
your
application,
so
we'll
post
that
probably
Friday
or
Saturday
this
week.
So
when
you
check
back
in
your
application,
you'll
see
a
PDF
of
all
of
the
points
that
you
got
in
your
application
and
any
questions
we
may
have.
The
reason
why
we
give
you
this
on.
A
The
third
is
so
that
you
could
look
it
over
just
in
case
there
was
a
problem.
Maybe
I
missed
something
in
the
scoring.
Maybe
I
didn't
take
something
into
account.
We
give
you
a
few
days
to
say:
hey,
please,
take
a
look
at
this
additional
website
or
hey
I.
Have
this
extra
stake
or
I'm
willing
to
up
my
participation
in
the
program
whatever
it
is?
We're
going
to
give
you
three
or
four
days
to
kind
of
look
at
the
score.
Give
us
any
input
you
may
have,
and
then
we
can
update
it.
A
So
my
my
advice
for
anybody
on
the
call
that's
applied
to
be
a
notary
is
continue
to
check
your
GitHub
application
specifically
this
weekend
on
the
3rd
or
the
4th,
we'll
be
sharing
those
scores
and
that's
your
chance
to
kind
of
give
us
any
insight
or
things
that
might
be
missed
after
the
seventh
we're
gonna
say
no
Moss,
no
more,
no
more
inputs,
and
that
gives
Phil
and
I
a
chance
to
go
through
and
exactly
Rank
by
which
particular
areas
and
all
the
exact
notaries.
And
then
on
the
ninth.
A
We
will
share
the
repo
with
the
new
notaries
that
were
selected
and
I
will
send
a
congratulations,
email
and
slack
to
those
notaries
and
welcome
into
the
public
channels
that
they
have
so
with
this.
This
is
the
next
steps
that
we
have
I
like
to
pause
again
and
see.
If
anybody
has
any
questions
comments
or
like
to
discuss
anything
on
this
going
forward.
A
A
Here
is
the
last
check-in
on
the
timeline
we
are
currently
in
the
scoring
phase.
This
is
going
to
take
us
through
the
night
after
the
ninth
we're
going
to
announce
the
recipients
of
the
fourth
round
of
notary
elections,
and
then
we
were
going
to
begin
onboarding
from
the
12th
through
the
23rd,
and
this
is
the
time
that
we're
going
to
really
invest
heavily
and
like
going
through.
What
is
trust
and
transparency?
Look
like
how
do
you
use
all
the
tools?
How
do
you
communicate?
A
We
had
a
lot
of
really
good
Lessons
Learned
From,
the
third
election,
so
we're
really
hoping
to
make
this
as
strategic
and
helpful
as
possible
to
onboard
you
into
the
program.
So
again,
all
of
this
is
happening
right
now
and
the
scores
are
going
to
be
announced
on
the
9th
and
you
will
see
your
applications
updated.
A
F
Now,
just
following
this
I'll
I
recently
posted
a
message
regarding
the
governance
team,
not
kind
of
primarily
doing
the
kyc
and
K
by
KYB,
but
this
step
would
eventually
evolve
into
this
information,
which
is
the
email,
verification
or
business
or
business
business,
license
certification
as
well
being
used
by
notaries,
and
so
that's
what
this
proposal
is
about,
so
that
all
notaries
have
basically
the
same
access
to
enough
information
in
there
while
they
conducted
due
division
process.
So
that's
basically
the
summary
of
this
proposal.
A
F
Yeah,
so
right
now
you
know
I
mean.
Is
the
process
the
same?
What
happens
right
now
is
an
email
is
sent
to
an
email
address,
that
is,
that
sits
at
the
Falcon
Foundation,
which
is
fulfill.org
email
and
then,
when
we
receive
that
email,
we
post
a
screenshot
kind
of
verifying
that
the
client
has
actually
sent
the
email
from
the
official
email
that
is
listed
on
their
socials,
that
they
provided,
but
so
yeah.
That
will
still
be
the
case.
I
think
this.
F
She
will
continue
to
do
it
and
so
right
now,
even
though
the
governance
team
isn't
going
to
do,
kyc
and
kyv
Sunny
is
so
we'll
still
have
access
to
this
email
and
they
will
still
basically
provide
screenshots
for
business
licenses.
There's
a
bigger
discussion
on
this,
where
you
know
where?
How
do
we
make
sure
that
sunny
or
the
governance
team
isn't
the
source
of
truth,
because
a
lot
of
the
times
clients
aren't
comfortable
sharing
the
business
license
directly
with
the
notaries?
So
this
is
kind
of
you
know,
I.
F
Think
a
point
of
discussion
that
I
think
today
might
not
be
the
best
time
to
do
it,
but
we
can
take
it
async,
but
yeah
I
think
this
proposal
doesn't
tackle
that
this
proposal
is
basically
saying
that
hey,
let's
get
all
the
clients
to
kind
of
do,
email,
verification
and,
if
required,
I,
think
the
business
license.
Verification
as
well
yeah.
J
F
M
F
F
F
Good
question
I
think
in
this
instance.
Of
course
you
want
to
understand
I,
think
so.
The
way
I
personally
think
about
the
difference
between
kyce
and
KYB
is
that
kyc
is
helping.
You
understand
what
kind
of
data
is
the
customer
bringing
so
I
think
when
you're
trying
to
understand
the
customer,
it's
like
what
are
their
needs
and
why
are
they
trying
to
use
filecoin,
whereas
when
we
do
KYB
KYB
is
understanding?
Okay
is
there
organization
located
where
they
are?
Is
the
organization
registered
in
different
locations?
I?
F
Think
it's
more
to
do
with
the
legal
kind
of
legalities
of
how
the
organization
is
structured
and
I.
Think
that's
what
we're
trying
to
learn
more
about
their
business,
whereas
I
think
in
kyc,
which
is
still
done
by
notaries
in
this
case
right,
where
they're
trying
to
understand.
Oh,
like
is
this
data
like
useful
to
file
coin
or
what
are
they
really
trying
to
do?
A
Ary
thanks
Sergey
and
then,
if
anybody
has
any
questions
on
this
issue,
this
is
790,
feel
free
to
comment
or
just
give
a
thumbs
up
like
for
those
of
you.
New
notaries
that
are
joining
on
you'll,
see
that
one
of
your
excellent
participation
is
participating
in
these
so
feel
free
to
at
least
just
give
a
thumbs
up
on
this
issue
and
GitHub.
If
you
approve
of
it,
feel
free
to
leave
a
comment
if
you
disapprove
or
you'd
like
to
see
some
action
taken,
but
we
are
looking
for
like
that.
A
Participation
on
these
issues
really
goes
a
long
way.
This
is
790
and
GitHub
all
right,
I
think
I'm
speaking
for
The
Marvelous,
KZ
I
will
not
be
able
to
fill
these
shoes,
but
here's
what
I
took
away
from
his
call
right
now
number
one.
This
program
is
on
wheels
that
are
jet
powered
and
have
thrusters
on
it.
A
So
it
sounds
like
there
is
a
lot
of
work
going
on
and
the
way
that
a
lot
of
that
work
is
being
tracked
is
in
this
link
that
Casey
is
shared
here
at
the
top
and
I'm
going
to
load
it
up.
Right
now,
and
what
he's
been
doing
with
this
link
is
to
try
to
make
it
as
public
as
possible
who's
participating
in
this
program
and
how
they're
verifying
those
individuals
very
similar
to
the
scoring
that
we
do
with
the
notary
elections,
but
just
much
more
tactical.
A
So
you
can
see
like
what
the
storage
provider
is
where
the
client
is,
what
KYB
has
been
obtained?
Is
it
the
business
license?
Has
it
been
emails?
What
questions
have
been
asked?
Is
that
step
completed
where
they've
been
tracking
it,
so
incredibly
detailed
and
Incredibly
open,
so
this
is
meant
to
be
as
transparent
as
possible
and
then
he's
been
really
forward-leaning
with
leaving
notes
that
you
can
see
in
the
community
like
hey
what
is
it
specifically
needed?
Like
five
signatures,
three
signatures,
two
signatures:
it
is
a
complete.
Where
does
it
stand
so
Props
to
KZ?
A
If
he's
out
there
somewhere
I
hope
he
gets
these
Good
Vibes
of
documentation
so
right
there
they
have
14
client
applications,
so
they've
completed
one
data
cap
on
it.
One
more
is
waiting
in
five
more
go
into
that
K
by
be
processed.
The
second
thing
that
he
was
flagging
is
they
have
contracted
with
a
third
party
vendor
to
verify
these
transactions.
This
happened
right
around
the
time.
Phil
Lisbon
kicked
off
at
the
end
of
October.
It
sounds
like
that.
Vendor
is
going
through
some
kind
of
like
close
for
the
seasons.
A
I
didn't
quite
catch
that,
but
because
they're
unavailable
in
China,
this
vendor
program
is
going
to
kick
off,
probably
in
the
new
here.
So
once
that
test
starts,
it's
going
to
be
really
powerful
for
this
group
to
actually
verify
transactions
that
go
through.
So
you
just
wanted
to
make
that
aware.
If
you
were
waiting
for
that
transaction
is
going
to
happen
in
January.
The
two
highlights
the
KZ
was
calling
out
actually
three.
A
The
first
was
that
if
you
are
asking
for
five
petabytes-
and
you
don't
need
five
petabytes,
this
isn't
like
you-
get
an
all-access
passed
to
a
water
park.
It's
probably
not
in
your
best
interest.
So
his
big
talking
point
this
morning
was
look.
If
you
only
need
500
terabytes
ask
for
the
500
terabytes,
it's
going
to
make
your
life
easier.
It's
going
to
make
the
diligence
life
easier
and
you're
really
going
to
appreciate
that
we
can
add
on
more
later.
Don't
just
ask
for
the
max
just
because
it's
there.
A
The
second
sorry
was
that,
as
this
data
site
comes
through
the
more
information,
the
better
and
the
more
transparent
you
are.
So
that
means
that
if
you
fill
out
one
of
these
applications-
and
you
say
hey
the
date-
is
private
I'm
private
I
need
five
petabytes.
Look,
it's
going
to
be
a
long
slog
for
you,
so
the
more
that
you
can
come
out
with
this
and
be
straightforward
with
what
you're
looking
for
and
communicate
that
up
front
the
faster.
A
This
will
go
for
you,
so
any
slowdowns
can
be
mitigated
by
one
being
realistic
with
the
data
that
you
need
and
two
being
upfront
with
who
the
organization
is
and
what
you're
willing
to
share
off
with
that
and
then
three,
the
point
that
he
was
making
before
and
you'll
see
it
right
here
is
that
the
SPs
need
to
be
contacted
to
confirm
participation
so
really
having
those
in
the
loop.
So
those
of
you
on
the
call
that
are
both
notaries
and
service
providers.
A
F
So
just
kind
of
wanted
to.
Let
you
know
that?
It's
not
that
you
know,
because
these
clients
are
not
able
to
use
Duro
and
we'll
just
give
them
a
pass.
It's
a
big
country,
I
think
kyc,
Solutions,
exist
and
I
think
we'll
require
or
ask
the
clients
to.
Please
do
the
kyc
use
the
service
that
their
company
comfortable
with,
so
that
they
could
support
the
due
to
business
process
for
the
notaries.
G
Just
a
note
just
to
get
this
on
on
record,
it
would
be
nice
in
the
future
if,
if
we
had
like
a
pool
of
of
clients
and
notaries
that
are
used,
that
they
need
similar
tools,
so
we
can
ask
for
better
deals
on
on
those
tools
and
get
a
better
pricing.
So
maybe
that
that's
something
that
that
we
started
doing.
E
N
I
think
this
is
great
right.
What
KZ
is
doing?
One
of
the
things
just
looking
at
this
program?
That's
popped
up
from
my
mind
and
I.
Just
am
curious.
I
tried
to
get
a
little
bit
of
information,
but
ever
it
doesn't
exist
or
I
couldn't
find
it,
but
one
of
the
I
guess
constraints
I
see
here
is
RJ
said
it's
about
scalability.
N
Is
that
the
10x
block
rewards
are
such
a
big
benefit
that
we
need
to
put
all
these
like
constraints
around
and
I'm
wondering
whether
there
is
a
possibility
that
this
starts
to
look
at
a
separate
tier
two
ball,
plus
where
we
know
it's
private
data
and
it's
valuable,
but
it's
maybe
not
as
valuable
as
open
data
or
what
we
would
traditionally
call
file
plus
I.
Don't
I,
don't
know
if
that
conversation
is
a
part
of
this
working
group
or
is
that
a
separate
conversation.
D
D
Multiplier
for
public,
let's
say
or
you
could
think
of
it,
either
way
where
we
either
scale
back.
You
know
the
time
to
being
less
or
private
or
increase
the
multiplier
for
public
either
way
is
reasonable,
but
it's
definitely
been
a
topic.
I
wouldn't
say
it's
specific
to
a
working
group
yeah.
But
if
you
have
a
concrete
ideas
that
you'd
want
to
see,
this
customer
recommendation
would
be
to
open
up
a
discussion
in
the
GitHub
repo,
as
a
discussion,
topic
and
I
will
certainly
back
you
up.
D
B
D
L
Hello
I
have
a
question
as
far
as
I
know,
many
banks
in
China
can
check
the
flow
of
electronic
bills.
This
can
be
verified
through
the
official
Banks
websites,
as
well
as
you
pull
through
the
bank
like
rent
advertise
and
and
so
on.
You
can
check
that,
though,
is
their
equivalent
of
an
integrated
website,
but
this
can
be
viewed
built
separately
in
China.
I
can
invested
the
specific
the
specific
situation
and
then
pmu
because
of
the
manual
ky,
say
method.
Now
we
will
definitely
automate
in
Future
ride.
F
I
think
that's
definitely
something
you
have
considered
I
think
just
to
wrap
up
this
discussion.
I
think
there's
of
course,
some
challenges
with
you
know
gdpr
and
how
data
is
shared
as
well
and
so
kind
of
we
have
to
take
a
very
holistic
perspective
on
what
are
we
asking
where's
the
data
living
after
we
get
that
data,
and
you
know
so.
It
is
like
a
little
challenging
from
that
perspective,
but
I
think
what
I'll
do
is
start
a
discussion
on
the
lower
governance,
repo
and
then
I.
F
A
F
Regarding
trust
and
transparency,
which
which
are
concerned
with
tooling,
will
be
shared
in
the
TNT
working
group,
calls
that
happen
every
other
week
on
Tuesdays,
but
I
wanted
to
just
talk
about
two
of
the
updates
that
have
shared
and
written
form
on
different
channels
over
the
past
week,
I
think
the
first
update
is
regarding
what
is
the
governance
team
doing
regarding
the
moving
along
the
LDN
pipeline.
I.
Think
you
know
time
to
do.
F
So
if
you're,
a
client
and
or
you're
an
SP
you're
bringing
was
bringing
on
a
client
and
all
the
fields
that
are
requested
in
the
ldm
were
complete,
then
the
trigger
will
happen.
So
the
trigger
is
not
a
sine
of
kyc.
So
over
the
past
couple
of
days
we've
received
some.
You
know
comments
from
community
members
saying
that
hey.
Why
was
this
application
triggered?
This
seems
very
kind
of
sus,
or
this
does
not
seem
like
a
like.
The
client
is
being
honest
and
our
response
there
is,
while
they
haven't
received
data
cap
right.
F
It
does
take
care
of
things
like
collusion
and
abuse
to
some
extent,
I
think
along
that
side,
some
of
the
tools
that
the
that
I'm
working
on,
like
the
CID
Checker
tool
and
kind
of
relationship
mapping
between
different
stakeholders
will
assist
that
effort,
but
all
applications
that
are
20
21
days
or
more
right
now
are
being
prioritized
so
you'll
see
that
approximately
50
applications
to
60
applications
are
being
triggered
every
day.
Now
we
still
need
your
help.
F
As
committee
members,
our
fraud,
analyst
Sunny,
is
still
working
on
these
applications,
so
the
tldr
here
is
that
if
you
see
an
application
that
has
been
triggered,
don't
assume
that
that
application
has
passed
all
the
checks,
all
that
all.
That
means
to
start
that
application
is
complete
and
then
they've
provided
the
information
requested,
but
you
could
still,
as
a
community
member,
require
ask
for
more
information
and
you're
encouraged
to
do
so.
F
You
can
still
block
them
if
you
think
that
they
are
kind
of
Performing,
suspicious
Behavior
by
kind
of
requesting
notaries,
to
not
sign
in
providing
evidence
for
that
for
the
request.
So
that's
not
a
bit
number
one
and
I
think
the
second
update
is
it's
a
bit
smaller,
so
I've
come
across
a
lot
of
applications
that
are
multi-part
applications
that
are
trying
to
apply
for
more
than
five
Pips,
but
they
end
up
using
different
client
addresses
and
I've,
at
least
when
I
talk
to
some
of
these
clients.
F
They
said
that
oh,
like
this
was
a
rule,
but
in
my
own
analysis,
I
haven't
found
that
this
was.
This
is
not
a
rule.
You
don't
need
to
use
a
different
client
address
if
you
are
applying
for
a
multi-part
application.
So
please,
if
you're
a
client
or
an
SP
like
bringing
on
a
client,
please
use
the
same
client
address
so
that
we
can.
On
the
interesting
transparency
side,
we
can
track.
These
addresses
understand
the
relationships
between
the
different
stakeholders.
F
If
we
do
find
you
know,
you're
using
different
client
addresses
either
you
have
to
provide
a
really
good
reasoning
why
you
are
doing
that
or
we
might
request
you
to
please
use
one
address
for
the
entire
allocation.
Of
course,
given
that
you
know
it
passes
all
the
checks
and
notaries
approve
it.
So
those
are
two
major
updates
around
the
trust
and
transparency
front.
F
A
Wonderful
thanks,
RG
last
update
comes
from
me
and
this
is
the
schedules.
So
the
last
call
the
notary
governance
call.
2022
is
going
to
take
place
on
December
13th
Last
Call,
the
call
that
was
scheduled
for
the
27th.
We
are
going
to
cancel
that
one
due
to
the
holiday
break
here
in
the
states,
and
that
will
be
a
bye
week.
A
There
will
be
no
notary
governance,
call
that
takes
place
on
that,
while
the
async,
if
you
have
issues-
and
they
will
resume
the
calls
as
scheduled,
I-
think
that
comes
out
on
January
10th,
so
I'm
in
the
process
of
cleaning
up
the
calendar
after
the
13th
I'll
reset
everything
for
2023
notaries
that
have
reapplied
I
will
give
you
the
option
to
manually.
I
can
put
you
on
the
calendar
or
you
could
just
follow
it.
A
I'll
ask
you
that,
as
we
start
to
your
onboarding
process,
this
isn't
everyone
consider
this
a
one
month,
heads
up
there
will
be
no
call
on
December.
27Th
I
am
sharing
the
link
to
participation
in
chat
one
last
time.
So
this
is
your
chance.
If
you
joined
late
and
didn't
see
that
already
please
log
into
airtable
get
credit
for
coming,
we'd
love
to
see
your
face,
have
your
participation
and
also
Mark
your
dad
as
you
go
through
it.
Typically,
we
save
the
community
discussions
before
we
do
the
LDN.
A
What
I
like
to
do
is
do
the
LDN
and
see
if
they
are
on
the
call
and
give
them
time
since
they
weren't
here
this
morning
and
if
not
then
we'll
turn
it
over
for
the
last
few
minutes
for
the
Community
discussion.
So
was
there
anybody
from
wechu,
blockchain
or
zalium
design?
That's
here
and
would
like
to
talk
about
your
project.
A
All
right,
well,
I'll,
speak
on
their
behalf
for
30
seconds
and
I'll
put
these
links
in
the
notary
Channel
as
well
as
fill
applications.
So
the
first
one,
this
Roshan
design,
which
is
this
application,
is
ready.
It's
put
in
I,
think
they're
looking
for
comments
or
feedback,
they
have
a
project
overview,
video
that
was
put
13
days
ago.
A
This
has
been
open
for
around
two
or
three
weeks,
they're
looking
for
someone
to
come
in
there
and
tell
them
if
anything
is
waiting,
they're
looking
for
a
notary
who
might
be
able
to
step
in
and
approve
this
data
so
again,
they're
just
looking
for
any
kind
of
updates
they
can
have
with
this,
and
they
put
that
through
there
so
I'm
going
to
let
them
know
hey.
We
gave
them
time.
We
didn't
see
you
on
the
call.
This
is
your
last
chance,
so
heads
up
those
are
there
waiting
for
it
with
that.
A
We
have
a
few
minutes
left
I'm,
going
to
turn
this
over
to
the
community
if
there
was
anything
that
anyone
would
like
to
flag
or
bring
up
in
the
final
moments
of
the
call
we'll
give
you
a
few
moments,
we'll
probably
lock
each
issue
to
two
or
three
minutes
that
way
you
can
kind
of
have
an
assortment
or
give
you
the
time
back.
So
if.
H
G
G
J
G
Github
using
using
that,
as
as
the
platform
for
like
the
service
operations
that
that
we
are
using
right
now,
so
I
see
that,
as
as
a
risk
and
I
I
raised
that
earlier
in
the
first
call
and
I
would
like
to
raise
the
flag
again
and
ask
for
any
feedback.
We
should
probably
get
someone
from
legal
to
review
this
as
well
and
see
if
there's
any
risks
there
and
and
plan
for
any
mitigations.
D
Yeah
I,
don't
think
people
get
suspended
because
they
participate
in
Falkland,
plus
Alex
I.
Think
this
concern
is
not
real.
People
get
suspended
because
GitHub
itself
is
a
tool,
has
some
really
extreme
identification
of
account
sharing,
as
well
as
access
through
regions
where
it's
not
available,
as
well
as
access
across
VPN,
so
when
they,
when
they
track
people
that
are
impersonating
like
being
in
a
different
location
than
they
are
or
a
gown
share
and
password
share,
they
tend
to
shut
down
the
account,
and
so
there's
it's
not
because
there's
any
participate.
D
It's
not
related
to
participation
in
the
program.
Necessarily
it's
because
people
like
accounts,
individual
accounts,
violate
the
terms
of
service.
So
when
you
say
that
there's
an
existential
risk
to
plus
strong
at
stuff
on
GitHub,
then
I'd
like
to
value
that,
against
the
actual
terms
of
service
that
are
on
GitHub,
in
which
case
like
what
it
really
comes
down
to
is.
Are
we
using
this
to
store
stuff
that
doesn't
violate
basic
principles
of
GitHub
and
I?
D
G
B
G
Didn't
actually
like
read
everything
from
the
terms
of
service.
That's
probably
something
that
that
we
need
to
do
and
and
just
to
make
sure,
because,
if
they're,
if
they
see
like,
if
if
they
have
a
system,
that
detects
detects
the
the
those
accounts
and
suspend
those
accounts-
and
we
have
a
lot
of
those
accounts
being
suspended
involved
in
interacting
with
our
repositors
and
and
with
the
organization,
then
the
repository
gets
flagged
as
well.
G
G
G
B
B
D
G
J
D
For
what
it's
worth,
the
repos,
underneath
the
Falcon
project
organization
and
so
I
think,
given
how
prevalent
that
is
like
the
Falcon
project
itself,
has
266
public
repositories
with
like
204
people,
part
of
the
organization
contributing
I
I.
Don't
really
think
this
is
a
source
of
concern,
but
the
point
on
having
a
backup
I
think
is
a
very
reasonable
one,
and
so
I
I
would
I'm
personally
going
to
index
on
that
higher
until
I
hear
otherwise.
But
I
appreciate
the
point.
D
A
A
All
right
we'll
give
you
that
three,
two
minutes
back.
Thank
you
again.
Thank
you
again
for
everybody,
who's
on
the
call
we'll
be
seeing
your
notary
scores
come
through.
Remember,
there's
no
call
on
the
27th,
and
the
last
day
for
scoring
is
on
the
ninth
we'll
be
announced.
Those
scores
that
come
through
and
the
slide
deck
is
in
slide.
But
again,
thank
you
all
for
coming
and
we'll
see
you
on
the
next
call
regular
time
on
the
13th
cheers
everyone.