►
From YouTube: Filecoin Plus - July 20 Notary Governance Call
Description
Filecoin Plus governance call, in which we discuss recent DataCap allocation trends, clients applications for Large Dataset Notaries, and the open topics for governance community discussion.
A
Hey
everybody
welcome
to
the
falcon
plus
notary
governance
and
community
governance,
call
for
july
20th
2021
we're
almost
at
the
solstice
making
good
progress
through
the
year,
and
so
let's
get
started
so
same
agenda.
I
thought
about
reversing
it
based
on
the
feedback
from
julian
lost
last
time
around,
but
this
one
is
not
so
packed,
so
I
didn't
do
it
this
time,
but
I
do
think
moving
forward.
A
We
should
reverse
this
so
that
we're
prioritizing
issues
and
anything
related
to
large
data
set
notice
before
we
get
into
some
of
the
more
status
update,
oriented
things
since
we
end
up
not
always
having
enough
time
to
have
the
discussion
well,
anyway,
quick,
quick
updates.
Things
have
started
moving
a
lot
more
so
in
the
last
two
in
the
last
two
weeks.
A
A
I
think
two
of
them
are
five
peppy
bytes
one
is
at
one
point,
five,
five
bytes,
so
three
out
of
five
one
is
a
one
point
five
and
I
think
there's
another
one
coming
for
0.5,
but
quite
a
bit
of
data
cap
coming
in
from
from
the
multi
six
and
then
of
that
relatively
small
proportion.
I
usually
do
percentages
here.
I
didn't
this
time
because
I
think
it's
not
fair
to
correlate
individual
node
reactions
with
the
multi-six
ones.
A
So
this
this
will
probably
turn
into
a
table
unless
you
folks
have
feedback
on
how
you'd
rather
see
these
updates
on
a
bi-weekly
basis,
and
so
in
some
way
we
would
probably
want
to
show
like
what
what
the
standard
like
one
nursery
decline.
Allocation
path
is
looking
like
from
a
data
cap
flow
and
a
usage
perspective,
and
then
what
it's
looking
like
in
the
case
of
a
multi-signature
for
a
large
dataset
project,
the
time
to
data
cap
is
continuing
to
go
down.
A
I
think
this
was
the
biggest
jump
I've
seen
so
usually
it
goes
down
about
six
days,
six
hours,
or
so
every
governance
call
this
time
it's
down
more
than
half
a
day,
it's
finally
below
four
days,
which
I
don't
think
I've
seen
before.
I
think
this
is
both
a
combination
of
as
in
the
past,
like
a
lot
of
people
using
verified
uplift
at
I
o,
but
also
in
general,
like
notaries,
are
getting
faster.
A
But
I
do
want
to
flag
that
several
of
the
new,
the
new
completely
brand
new
notaries
have
not
yet
really
been
activated
through
the
app
in
that
they're
not
actually
getting
assigned
issues
automatically
and
to
solve
that
problem.
I'm
going
to
also
address
towards
the
end
of
this
call,
but
yeah
looking
better.
So
hopefully
you
know
either
correlated
with
elections
or
anything
else.
A
We
don't
know
yet,
but
if
you
have
any
suggestions
or
ideas
on
how
we
can
continue
bringing
this
number
down,
we'd
love
to
hear
it,
because
it
feels
like
we're
trending
in
the
right
direction.
So
that's
fantastic
and
you
further
corroboration
of
that
is
just
pulling
from
the
textile
repo,
which
is
also
tracking
at
a
bigger
scale
like
what's
actually
happening
in
in
the
falcon
plus
ecosystem.
A
You
can
see.
Numbers
are
going
down
where
I
typically
look
is
how
long
these
two
numbers
are
up
like
how
big
they
are,
and
then
I
also
look
at
so
sorry
just
comparing.
So
this
obviously
went
down
nearly
by
a
factor
of
half,
and
then
this
also
went
down
just
slightly
less,
but
it
did
go
down,
and
this
is
similar
to
the
time
that
I'm
tracking
the
dashboard
as
well
and
so
good,
to
see
movement
in
the
right
direction.
A
One
thing
I
did
want
to
ask
if
andrew's
here
actually
is,
is
this
being?
Is
this
like
a
rolling
average
kind
of
a
thing
over
a
period
of
of
a
relationship
average?
Is
this
like
a
rolling
window
of
a
period
of
like
n
weeks,
where,
like
you,
judge
the
medium
based
on
you
know
the
last
like
three
weeks
or
four
weeks,
or
is
it
yeah.
B
B
B
C
B
A
Thank
you.
That's
great.
I
will
take
a
look
at
that
sweet,
switching
gears
into
updates
and
largely
said
notary
side
of
things.
So
we
just
we
talked
about
this.
This
second
set
of
points
of
discussion
as
a
summary
in
the
last
governance
call,
but,
of
course,
because
the
time
zones
not
everybody's
there,
the
main
thing
I
wanted
to
retouch
was
basically
what
are
the
expectations
of
being
like
a
lead
notary
on
a
larger
set
notary
or
in
a
multi-signatory.
A
The
expectation
is
that,
like
the
lead
notary
is
the
person
who's
actually
requesting
the
allocation
in
github.
That
goes
to
the
app
for
everybody
to
use
and
is
also
the
person
that
I
assume
most
notaries
will
look
to
or
defer
to
when
it
comes
to
ensuring
that
the
client
is
not
doing
something
bad
or
wrong
or
violating
basically
their
own
application
when
it
comes
to
using
the
large
amount
of
data
gap
that
they
have
deceived,
and
so
I
viewed
this
as
like
a
slightly
higher
burden
and
I
was
sort
of
pitching
it
as,
like.
A
Hopefully,
that
helps
the
reason.
I'm
re
hashing
this
as
well,
as
I
think,
a
couple
of
issues
don't
yet
have
like
a
like
a
explicit
lead
notary,
even
though
they
have
enough
notaries
to
get
going
and
just
a
quick
reminder
enough
here
being
seven
notaries
that
spread
across
at
least
three
regions
but
yeah.
A
If
you
are
interested
in
doing
that
for
any
of
these
projects,
it
would
be
awesome
for
you
to
just
nominate
yourself
in
some
way
or
just
flag
in
some
way
in
the
github
issue,
where
you
say,
you're
willing
to
be
notary,
just
also
say
you're
willing
to
be
elite
notary.
That
would
be
very
helpful
and
then
the
last
thing
I
wanted
to
flag
was
support
for
slingshot.
So
this
is
still
an
ongoing
conversation.
A
For
those
of
you
that
are
interested
in
supporting
him,
cool
and
so
quick
update
is
that
four
multi-signatories
have
been
signed
on
the
chain.
Discover
estuary
nfg,
sturgeon
top
pipeli.
I
do
want
to
flag
that
there's
currently
a
bug
in
the
in
the
bot
where,
when
the
largest
at
notary
multi-sigs
lead
notary
kicks
off
the
message
for
an
allocation
to
the
client
for
some
reason
it's
not
showing
up
in
the
app
correctly.
A
So
we
realized
this
yesterday,
thanks
to
julian
and
so
we're
working
hard
with
the
team
to
try
and
debug
like
what's
actually
happening
and
so
yeah
and
then
the
the
next
thing
is
that
we're
awaiting
one
for
key
holder
signature,
which
is
the
chengdu
digital
media
industry
base.
I
think
they've
received
one
signature.
They
need
the
second
that
should
be
coming
the
next
few
days
as
well,
and
then
there's
eight
open
applications
right
now
and
so
yeah.
I
wanted
to
you
know
for
our
last
conversation.
A
A
D
Select
the
wrong
mac,
my
application
is
one
of
the
earliest
applications
and
right
now,
four
notaries
have
expressed
their
interest,
but
I
need
three
more
talking
about
the
incentive
from
slingshot
prices.
In
my
application,
I
think
it's
more
benefit
to
the
to
the
small
manners
that
I
work
with
really
because
they
really
need
the
data
cap
to
increase
their
power,
and
I
have
records
of
making
deals
with
multiple
miners
in
the
past,
and
I
have
provided
a
csv
listing
all
the
manners
I
have
worked
with.
D
D
Yeah,
hopefully,
some
notaries
today
can
give
me
support
on
that.
Also,
maybe
we
can
discuss
about
the
rule
of
notaries
once
they
are
sponsoring
my
project.
They
cannot
receive
deals
for
me
and
that's
some
of
the
concerns
that
they're
having.
I
think
if
we
can
hear
some
words
from
you
deep
about
that
would
be
great.
D
A
A
Yeah
and
also,
if
there's
any
questions
which
I'll
split
sorry
for
faye
sorry
saying
charles,
because
I'm
responding
as
well
there's
any
questions
for
faye.
Please
do
ask
one
question
I
have
is
in
the
case
of
slingshot.
There
is
always
you
know
the
chance
that
every
data
set
is
onboarded
a
lot.
We
exclude
it
from
the
next
phase,
for
example.
A
D
I
can
ask
in
the
application-
maybe
I
can
continue
to
store
with
manner
but
not
claiming
any
prizes
to
continue
to
help
the
community
or
cancel
the
application.
I
guess
cool
yeah,
because
once
I
started
sending
out
more
deals,
isn't
isn't
such
a
big
deal
for
me,
but
it
will
really
continue
to
help
the
manners
yeah.
A
Cool
thanks
no
problem,
okay
and
then
the
well
technically.
I
now
represent
the
the
deal
bots
project,
so
I
can
talk
a
little
bit
about
that.
Basically,
that
is
it's
very
difficult
to
track
deals
that
don't
succeed
because
they
don't
end
up
on
the
chain,
and
so
we
are
looking
for
ways
in
which
we
can
get
much
more
accurate,
like
reputation
and
state
of
truth,
data
about
different
storage
providers
on
the
network,
and
so
the
best
way
to
do
that
is
to
attempt
making
deals.
And
so
currently
we
have.
A
Changes
for
the
storage
provider,
side
of
things
like
the
separation
of
the
different
processes
in
the
minor
run
time
and
a
couple
other
things,
and
so
because
five
point
plus
is
seen
as
like
the
ideal
path
for
a
client
and
we're
trying
to
replicate
the
ideal
path
for
a
client
and
test
against
it.
Constantly
this
application
is
effectively
purely
just
to
say,
hey.
This
is
what
we
want
to
ensure
our
clients
can
do
successfully
when
they
come
to
the
network.
A
So
let's
replicate
their
behavior
and
and
gather
statistics
make
those
statistics
available
publicly
via
a
graphql
like
endpoint.
So
anybody
can
query
them.
Let's
also
push
them
into
reputation
systems,
so
reputation
systems
can
take
that
data
as
a
much
better
source
of
data
than
just
query.
Ask
on
a
bunch
of
search
providers
on
the
network,
and
so
it's
it's
not
a
very
complex
use
case.
A
Yeah,
hopefully
you
know,
if
you
have
any
questions,
feel
free
to
ping.
Me
looks
like
we
already
have
two
or
three
energies
and
support
so
need
a
few
more
as
well
on
that
one,
if
you
think
it's
worthy
of
your
support
but
yeah.
Let's
talk
about
the
topic
that
fey
flagged.
Actually,
I
think
it's
a
really
good,
really
good
topic
of
conversation.
I
figured
we'd
have
this
conversation
later
in
the
call,
but
we
may
as
well.
Do
it
now
sophie?
A
D
A
A
That's
signing
on
can
receive
like
five
percent
of
the
deals
or
like
something
like
that,
because
it
it
does.
Look
like
it'll,
be
hard,
I
think
otherwise,
alternatively
yeah,
I'm
also,
you
know
open
to
sticking
with
not
allowing
any
self
like
allocation,
because
ultimately
there
are
24
notaries
in
total,
and
so
getting
seven
that
aren't
ones
that
you
make
deals
with
is
probably
like
a
realistic
outcome
too,
and
so
yeah
I'd
love
to
hear.
If
there's
any
opinions
on
this.
A
Especially
from
notaries
that
aren't
miners
you're
curious
what
your
take
is,
but
also,
of
course,
notaries,
that
our
client
are
also
providing
the
storage
of
service.
What
do
you
think
give
it
a
if
you
have
any
questions
or
want
me
to
clarify
my
question.
Please
also
let
me
know,
but
I
would
love
to
have
a
few
minute
discussion
on
this
topic,
because
I
think
it's
an
important
one.
Thank
you.
Faye
for
flagging.
E
A
C
A
A
A
A
Cool
okay
so
face
gonna,
add
in
that
line
to
this
thing
and
see
if
that
works
for
the
other
notaries
that
are
interested
in
maybe
signing
or
not
signing.
I
did
want
to
also
open
up
the
conversation
to
any
other
people
that
had
opinions.
Quick
recap
we're
basically
discussing
if
a
signer.
So
if
you
are
a
notary
that
is
also
a
storage
provider
in
the
network
and
you
sign
on
to
a
large
data
set
notary
as
one
of
the
seven
others,
seven
total
signatures.
A
Can
you
get
any
deals
from
that
client?
And
so
the
previous
assumption
was
when
you're,
the
only
notary
you
can't,
and
so
maybe
when
you're
operating
in
the
group,
you
also
should
not,
and
so
there's
two
ways
we
could
look
at
this,
which
is,
we
could
say,
continue
with
that,
because
there's
24,
total
notaries
shouldn't
be
difficult
to
get
seven
signatures.
That
aren't
you
know
a
particular
notary
signature
and
in
the
case
where
it's
like
fey,
where
he's
spreading
them
across
many
notaries.
Maybe
there's
a
tolerance
or
we
make
it.
A
A
I
just
want
to
hear
you
know
if
there's
any
other
strong
opinions
on
this
one,
we'll
probably
talk
about
it
in
the
next
governance,
call
as
well
to
make
sure
the
other
half
of
the
notaries
that
aren't
here
today
can
make
it,
but
I
think
for
for
phase
specific
case,
you
should
just
add
that
to
the
application,
and
we
can
talk
on
github
to
make
sure
that
you
get
unblocked
yeah
in
the
meanwhile
any
other
any
other
opinions
on
this.
Please
drop
them
in
chat
or
feel
free
to
unmute.
A
A
A
I
briefly
talked
to
you
about
the
deal
boss
project
towards
the
end
of
that
list,
but
there's
six
other
clients
that
also
have
extensive
applications
that
I
would
urge
you
to
just
spend.
You
know
a
minute
even
each
to
skim
through
them
see
what
you
find
interesting
as
a
notary
that
you'd
like
to
support.
A
A
lot
of
these
are
very
compelling
and
good
used
to
cases
of
the
network,
and
so
yeah,
please,
head
over
to
the
the
large
data
sets
repo,
which
is,
I
think,
github.com
slash
file
coin
dash
project,
slash
file,
coin,
dash,
plus
dash
large
dash
data,
sets
and
check
out
the
other,
open
applications
and
and
drop
your
opinion.
You
don't
always
have
to
say
yes
either.
A
You
can
just
ask
helpful
questions
that
you
think
might
be
might
be
useful
in
the
process
of
due
diligence
for
us
as
a
community
to
ensure
that
we're
supporting
the
right
use
cases
cool.
We
also
talked
about
trying
to
come
up
with
a
way
in
which
we
could
define
success
for
this
program.
So
you
know
the
the
current
iteration
of
this
multisig
based
support
is
constrained
to
50
pebb
bytes
in
total.
A
A
One
of
the
bullets
that
I
think
was
a
takeaway
from
last
conversation
was
effectively
ensuring
that
we're
also
learning
stuff
from
this
process
as
a
group,
because,
obviously
this
is
limited
to
50
bytes,
I'm
sure
once
we
run
out
of
it,
we'll
probably
want
to
do
something
at
a
similar
or
larger
scale,
and
so,
if
anyone
has
ideas
on
specific
things,
we'd
like
to
talk
about
as
a
group
or
things
to
track,
then
now
it's
a
great
time
to
share,
if
not
feel
free
to
share
and
suck
get
up.
Oh
in
the
next
call.
A
A
System
we
have
anybody,
has
ideas
here
on
on
how
we
can
reduce
the
burden
for
due
diligence.
Let
me
know
if
it's,
if
it's
maybe
it's
simple
things
like
just
you
know,
sharing
the
url
for
the
one
of
the
dashboards
or
a
few
of
the
dashboards,
where
you
can
see
the
client
activity,
but
something
like
that.
E
A
True,
in
fact,
I
sometimes
think
we
we
need
to
have
less
and
have
just
specific
places
to
go
to,
but
yeah.
I
think
just
people
are
aware:
there's
the
two
dashboards
that
are
very,
very
helpful,
fieldplus.info,
fantastic
site,
very
good
for
tracking
allocations
and
then
the
one
that
I'm
working
on
that
has
a
very
complex
url,
which
I've
shared
in
the
past
and
will
probably
work
on
changing
the
the
url
before
talking
before
trying
to
spell
it
out
cool.
A
I
did
want
to
take
a
quick
two
minutes
and
just
talk
about
notary,
onboarding
and
notary,
like
execution
on
network,
so
the
the
the
first
thing
I
wanted
the
flag
is
we
had
office
hour
sessions
last
week
we
had
two
different
sessions.
I
recorded
the
second
one
that
one
was
more
sort
of
focused
on
implementation
and
tooling,
and
so
I
would
highly
recommend
you
take
a
look
at
that
link.
A
That
link
is
available
in
the
notaries
channel,
on
slack
so
make
sure
you
watch
that
it
basically
walks
through
how
you
use
github,
plus
the
falcon
plus
app
in
tandem
effectively
to
do
your
allocations.
But
the
second
thing
that
I
wanted
to
just
confirm.
So
a
lot
of
the
new
notaries
are
not
yet
receiving
net
new
applications
and
that's
because
their
the
metadata
that
we
need
from
them
could
it
needs
to
be
expanded
to
include
the
right,
github
ids.
A
So
right
now,
I'm
just
operating
based
on
adding
in
the
github
ids
with
which
you
filed
your
application.
If,
for
some
reason,
that's
not
the
case,
some
of
you
have
already
told
me
in
your
applications,
and
so
that's
great.
So
I
know
the
falcon
foundation
instead
of
using
megan's
github
will
be
using
danny's
and
then
I
think
I
think
wursu
r
d
center
is
also
switching
over
to
using
woods,
github
id
and
so
there's
a
couple
of
changes
based
on
just
operations
of
teams.
A
A
So
if
you're
here
and
you're
a
notary
or
you're
watching
this
in
your
notary
in
the
future,
then
you
know
ping
me
sorry.
If
you're
watching
this
in
the
future
very
far
into
the
future
like
more
than
a
week,
then
I
would
say
just
ping
in
the
notary
channel
if
you
need
to
change
your
metadata,
but
I
will
share
this
link
immediately
after
this
as
well
in
the
notate
channel.
A
So
I'll
give
everybody
a
couple
of
days
to
edit
stuff
too,
if
needed,
those
are
the
only
that's
the
only
really
like
thing
left.
That's
like
blocking
anything.
It's
not
even
actually
blocking
stuff,
because
technically
you
can
get
manually
assigned
applications
and
you
can
do
stuff
with
those
applications,
but
this
will
help
tremendously
in
making
things
more
fluid,
and
so
hopefully
lots
of
new.
You
know,
new
notes
coming
on
board
will
be
activated
very
quickly
but
yeah.
This
is
the
total
set
of
24
notaries.
A
A
I
think
partially,
because
falcon
plus
is
very
specifically
targeted
at
this
moment,
like
at
least
in
the
short
term,
towards
public
data,
and
so
in
general,
I
think
most
notaries
just
skew
towards
supporting
data
that
they
can
see
or
data
that
they
know
they
have
the
ability
to
retrieve
and
confirm.
But
of
course
you
know,
falcon
is
a
network
in
order
to
move
forward
in
the
future.
A
A
A
Cool
and
then
the
second
thing
I
wanted
to
flag
was
based
on
a
conversation
I
had
with
meg
who's
part
of
the
sorry,
the
notary
team
at
holland,
and
so
that
was
basically
around
like.
Is
there
a
more
optimal
time
that
we
can
do
these
governance
calls?
And
so
I
think
one
thing
that
we
were
talking
around
is
we're
throwing
around
sorry,
as
an
idea
was
like.
Do
we
change
the
time
slots
that
said
they're
more
accessible
to
everybody?
A
I
don't
know
if
this
is.
These
are
the
optimal
time
slots.
These
were
just
what
was
picked
initially
to
cater
to
as
much
of
the
the
initial
sort
of
falcon
plus
population
as
possible.
But
of
course
the
falcon
plus
population
is
changing.
There's
a
lot
of
new
faces
going
on
coming
out
on
board
a
lot
of
new
community
members
that
are
participating
in
shaping
the
program
and
so
yeah.
I
would
love
to
sort
of
get
an
idea
on
if
you
think
these
these
calls
are
at
a
good
time
or
how
we
can
adjust.
A
The
other
thing
that
I
was
thinking
about
is
we
currently
like
have
calls
every
two
weeks,
and
then
we
oscillate
right.
But
what
ends
up
happening
is
that
the
state
of
truth
at
each
call
is
vastly
different,
and
so
I
don't
know
how
many
notaries
end
up
with
the
opportunity
or
even
community
members
or
clients
or
minors,
had
the
opportunity
to
go
watch
the
recording
of
the
call
they
couldn't
come
to
if
they
were
interested.
A
And
so
I
was
wondering
if
it's
better,
to
do
calls
that
are
like
if
we
do
need
to
cover
time
zones
for
sure.
So
we
probably
have
two
calls,
but
maybe
we
have
two
almost
identical
topic
based
calls
like
the
same
day,
and
then
we
wait
like
three
weeks
in
between
calls
or
something
like
that
or
even
two
weeks.
If
we
want
that
cadence,
but
something
that
makes
the
content
more
consistent
across
each
session.
A
C
A
Yeah
very
hard
to
coordinate
against
across
the
entire
world,
of
course,
yeah.
I
definitely
think
that's
one
way
to
go.
I
think
we
then
need
to
come
up
with
a
cadence
that
I
think
works
megan
that
we
probably
would
love
to
get
some
insight
in
from
from
the
community
in
general,
like
it's
two
weeks
that
I
can
say,
do
we
want
to
do
three
weeks
or
one
week?
A
I
think
the
last
several
weeks
it's
felt
like
I
would
have
benefited
from
faster
calls,
but
I'm
that
was
mostly
because
of
questions
around
elections
and
launching
the
large
data
centers
and
stuff,
but
in
general,
before
that
sort
of
every
two
weeks
seems
like
a
good
touch
point.
So
you
have
anybody's
opinions.
Please
feel
free
to
share.
E
A
A
A
Yeah,
I
removed
a
bunch
of
folks
that
I
was,
I
don't
know
how
they
ended
up
there.
You
know
they
may
have
had
questions
at
some
point,
but
that
should
be
a
pretty
consistent
channel
at
this
point.
Hopefully,
if
you
see,
if
you
see
anything
that
we
need
to
adjust,
please
let
me
know
yeah,
okay,
okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
And
so
there
might
be
a
change
in
the
zoom
link.
I'm
doing
my
best
to
keep
the
same
one,
but
if
not
they'll
probably
be
like
a
different
link,
starting
at
the
next
call,
but
I'll
definitely
drop
a
message
in
the
notary
channel
and
and
update
both
the
the
associated
github
issue,
as
well
as
the
github
weekly,
where
this
link
is
present.
A
All
right
so
yeah,
all
of
you
calendar
folks,
are
gonna,
have
to
change
where
the
root
event
is
coming
from.
Oh
wow,
okay,
one
from
memory.
Look
at
that
champion
you
better
not
get
tripped
up
when
the
daylight
savings
times
hits
around
the
world.
Actually
I
don't
know
if
you
have
do
you
have
daylight
savings
times
in
china,
because
I
know
a
lot
of
countries
actually
don't
do
it,
but
that
definitely
messed
me
up
once
and
I
actually
missed
a
governance
call
several
months
ago.
B
Okay,
cool-
I
don't
know
if
everybody
here
knows,
but
we've
been
working
on
a
a
novel
way
to
make
deals
on
the
filecoin
network
that
I
think
is
pretty
relevant
to
this
group
and
so
I'd
love
to
actually
get
feedback
from
anybody
here.
So
the
mechanism
that
we've
been
building
is
an
auction
feed
that
miners
are
connecting
to
and
bidding
for
deals
so
that
we
can
kind
of
move
data
quickly.
B
We
can
generate
relationships
with
miners
that
are
having
good
reputations
and
able
to
store
data
fast,
and
so
this
has
been
running
for
a
while.
Now
we've
been
testing
it
with
a
small
group
of
miners,
we're
starting
on
board
more
and
then
in
an
hour
and
a
little
bit.
We're
gonna
have
our
first
auctions,
governance
call,
which
is
where
we're
going
to
start
sharing,
how
we're
changing
the
features.
How
minor
selection
is
happening
in
in
the
in
auction,
so
miners
bid
and
then
there's
sort
of
the
there's
a
winning
bidder.
B
B
Yeah
we've
had
people
actually
already
ask
for
that.
So
we'll
see
how
this
goes,
we'll
see
how
much
we
get
for
feedback
and
and
probably
start
scheduling
I
mean
I
think
we
already
have
it
on
the
calendar
to
recur,
but
we'll
we'll
move
it
so
that
it
bounces,
so
that
different
time
zones
can
join
different
things.
Let's
see.
A
B
Well,
the
thing
that
one
thing
just
to
note
the
thing
that's
really
sweet
about
this
for
phil
class
is
it
actually
removes
a
bit
of
the
minor
selection
from
clients.
So
here
it's
really
a
pure
economic
decision
about
what
minor,
you're,
you're
you're,
sending
your
data
to
and
a
bit
of
reputation
is
what
we'll
build
in
there.
So
I
think
it's
going
to
have
some
cool
implications
here
and
we're
seeing
some
really
good
results.
A
B
Well,
no,
the
answer
is
yes
in
the
short
term,
so
right
now
we've
applied
for
data
cap.
We
have
kind
of
two
categories
of
users.
We
have
blockchain
bridges
that
we've
been
building.
So
in
these
cases
we're
aggregating
data
from
many
users
firing
off
deals
to
get
them
stored
as
quickly
as
possible,
and
then
lately
we've
been
doing
what
we
call
direct
to
auction
clients,
so
they're,
actually
just
sending
payloads
for
auctions.
They
get
up.
They
get
distributed
to
the
feed.
B
I
think
some,
like
some
users,
are
just
going
to
want
to
manage
their
own
file,
coy
and
manage
their
own
data
cap
and
everything,
but
I
think
I
think
a
lot
of
cases
will
be
able
to
just
handle
it
for
them.
We
can
vet
the
clients,
which
means
that
miners
know
what
they're
bidding
on
a
bit
in
advance
like
we're.
B
Actually
gonna
have
metadata
about
what
the
deals
are
containing
and
all
that
sort
of
good
stuff,
and
then
we
also
want
to
work
with
miners
to
make
it
easy
for
clients
to
select
the
kind
of
miners
that
they're
storing
with
so
we're
going
to
start
collecting
information,
obviously
on
location.
But
you
know
other
other
parameters
there,
so
sweet.
A
Awesome
but
yeah,
if
you're,
if
you're
awakening
around,
definitely
take
a
look
at
this
nice
launch
governance
call
for
the
auctions.
I
think
you
dropped
a
link
in
the
chat
cool.
The
last
thing
I
wanted
to
flag
is
also
just
a
reminder
to
take
a
look
at
this
fip
number
116
in
the
repo
for
fips.
This
is
a
really
cool
idea.
We
talked
a
little
bit
about
in
the
previous
call,
but
it
was
the
idea
that
you,
after
you,
see
the
sector.
A
A
So
this
could
be
an
interesting
way
where
deal
making
itself
and
and
the
like
data
cap
being
a
blocker
to
deal
making
in
some
ways
is
no
longer
necessarily
the
case,
and
so
this
fifth
has
some
interesting
ideas
around
that.
But
it
also,
you
know,
requires
a
little
bit
of
thinking
around
like
how
you
structure
prices
from
a
minor
perspective
or
how
you
deal
with
block
rewards
that
would
have
been
higher.
Theoretically
if
the
data
cap
would
come
in
for
the
entire
duration
and
so
there's
some
really
interesting
ideas
that
need
more
opinions.
A
A
I
think
the
the
folks
that
file
the
issue
are
not
on
the
call
today,
but
but
maybe
we
can
ask
them
to
come
talk
about
it
as
well,
at
a
future
governance
call
but
yeah.
I
think
that
that's
pretty
much
it
is
there
anything
else.
Anybody
wanted
to
flag
or
we
might
be
setting
a
record
with
an
actual
timely
falcon
class
governance.