►
From YouTube: SimPEG Meeting, August 9th, 2023
Description
Weekly SimPEG meeting from August 9th, 2023
E
D
I
mean
yes,
we
saw
like
deers.
Marmots
are
yeah,
we
actually
saw
we
were
coming
down
one
of
the
the
hikes.
It
was
one
in
one
of
the
ski
centers.
We
were
right
next
to
the
chairs
and
we
saw
a
little
wolf
like
a
puppy
running
into
us
and
when
he
saw
us
he
turned
back
into
the
forest
and
we
kept
walking
and
at
some
point,
I
turned
and
I
saw
him
crossing
the
path
to
get
to
the
other.
D
E
C
A
B
D
Okay,
yeah
I
was
reading
the
notes,
I'm
really
glad
that
everyone
enjoyed
it
I,
don't
know
I
I
said
it
a
lot
lot
of
times,
but
yeah
I
was
really
grateful.
That
people
was
very
energetic
during
the
worship
both
during
the
sessions
and
both
like
hanging
out
I,
really
like
that
yeah
they
were
really
into
U.
Getting
to
know
each
other
and
start
working
more
together.
I
saw.
C
D
D
C
E
B
Go
well
as
far
as
announcements,
yep
I'm
back
in
Colorado
I,
another
thing,
I
tagged,
20,
Sy,
020
that
should
be
getting
out
and
getting
through
I
think
it's
still
disseminating
the
last
I
checked
on
it.
It
takes
a
while
to
build
all
the
documentation,
but
it's
everything
seemed
to
be
going
well,
it's
all.
It
was
uploaded
and.
C
B
B
A
B
B
D
E
B
E
C
E
B
Yeah,
so
it's
out
it's
ready
to
go
well,
I
think
it
still
hasn't
had
cond
of
Forge
yet,
but
that
usually
takes
a
little
a
few
minutes
or
takes
a
little
while,
but
it
should
be.
Okay.
I
know,
there's
now
a
since
there's
a
small
issue
that
gioan
required
UTM,
but
s
also
kind
of
required
it.
But
I
I
took
care
of
that
already
a
while
ago,
so
I'm
gonna
might
have
to
change
the
dependencies
on
the
cond.
C
C
F
A
Think
some
of
well
one
of
the
things
that
came
out
of
burs
I
think
be
great
to
Think.
Through
is
also
putting
just
a
bit
of
documentation
down
with
P
requests
and
really
thinking
about
what
we
can
do
to
streamline
that
and
to
be
bringing
in
things
faster,
and
if
we
see
something
and
if
it
is
an
improvement
to
you
know,
start
to
get
stuff
in
and
worry
about.
Iterating
later
is
I
think
you
know
heard
a
bit
of
feedback
from
folks.
A
We've
heard
this
before
too
that
if
you
know
when
that
process,
stalls
or
slows
down
with
lots
of
revision
requests,
it
does
dampen
sort
of
enthusiasm,
and
so,
if
there's
things
we
can
do
to
to
accelerate
that.
We
still,
you
know,
capturing
the
things
that
we
want
to
improve,
but
perhaps
doing
that
in.
C
A
B
Mean
there's
there's
a
difference
of
like
if
they're,
certainly
smaller
polar,
quests,
they're
easy
to
come
in
Faster
rate,
it's
like
it's
just
the
large,
the
ones
that
are
really
large
that
have
a
lot
of
changes
that
have
new
additions
and
stuff
that
we
still
need
to
be
careful
about
bringing
them
in.
We
just
like
bring
them
in
and
then
say,
we'll
fix
it
later,
because
we
generally,
we
won't
fix
it
later.
You
know
what
I
mean.
A
B
So
it
doesn't
really
give
a
sense
of
like
where
you're
at
in
the
poll
request.
I
would
like
to
see
us
make
use
of
that
more
often
than
we
do,
especially
for
people
come
like
new
contributors
might
be
able
to
point
them
to
a
few
more
guides
within
that
templates.
But
we
are
still
not
making
very
good
use
of.
C
E
Finally,
got
it
in
well:
I
started
the
PM
yeah
followed
the
template
there,
so
I'm
just
going
to
have
to
make
some
tests
and
yeah
a
few
comments.
Joe
I'll
just
have
to
let
just
to
see
what
you
want
to
do
with
it
so
to
make
it
work.
There
was
a
in
The
Meta
simulation,
there's
something
like
a
line
that
says:
if
persists
or
something
where
was
I,
don't
know
it
was
just.
E
It
was
like
a
setting
looking
for
true
or
false
and
for
some
reason
with
the
frequency
domain
and
the
natural
source
it
was,
it
wasn't
getting
triggered.
So
then
the
model
wouldn't
be
assigned
to
each
sub
simulation.
It
wasn't
doing
the
mapping
but
yeah
I,
I'll
I'll
P
you
in
the
pr
there
and
you
can
take
a
look
at
it.
E
E
D
C
D
And
he
was
also
pointing
to
contributing
to
rstd
file
and
we
are
using
now
Mar
file
for
that.
So
yeah
just
change
the
link,
and
the
other
thing
I
noticed-
was
that
we
currently
have
the
the
s.g.
repo,
which
is
the
actual
content
of
the
we
website,
but
there's
also
a
website
repo.
So
it
was
confusing
which
one
is
actually
the
sources
for
the
website.
So
I
asked.
D
An
is
should
to
archive.
old
one.
The
website
one
and
yeah
Rowan
already
did
that,
but
meanwhile
he
noticed
that
there
is
some
content
from
the
old
blog
in
there.
So
maybe
in
the
future,
we
want
to
recover
that
content
and
publish
it
again,
yeah
trying
to
follow
up
the
little
things
I've
been
doing
in
the
workshop
regarding
Computing
guidelines,
so.
E
C
E
A
F
Apparently,
sort
of
an
improved
Jupiter
book
type
thing
from
what
I
understand
so
yeah
I've
been
able
to
get
misted
up
and
running,
move
some
of
those
tutorial
python
notebooks
out
and
build
a
test
website
for
that
locally.
So
it's
actually
pretty
straightforward.
You
can
build
it
really.
Similarly,
to
how
you
build
a
Jupiter
book,
you
can
also
make
a
a
talk,
file,
animal
and
you
can
customize
stuff
in
there.
F
So
yeah
that's
seems
to
be
working
pretty
well
and
then
I've
also
been
playing
around
with
this
G
mesh
stuff
to
make
a
fancy
mesh
to
try
basically
em
simulations
on
a
tetraedro
mesh.
So
that
is
a
work
in
progress,
but
I
think
I've
learned
a
lot
about
how
gesh
sets
things
up
and
I
may
be
able
to
turn
my
I
python
notebook
into
sort
of
a
tutorial
and
post
that
s.
So
if
anyone
else
in
the
group
is
trying
to
design
a
mesh,
you
know
discretizing
around
their
their
transmitter.
A
F
Some
like
subtlety
in
terms
of
what
are
you
actually
doing,
you
know
you're
kind
of
putting
points
in
a
model,
but
then
you
also
have
to
add
them
to
the
mesh
and
there's
just
kind
of
some
overarching
Concepts.
That
I
wasn't
exactly
sure
where
to
it.
Wasn't
like
explicitly
given
to
me:
I
had
to
sort
of
trial
and
error,
but
yeah.
It
makes
sense
for
the
most
part.
Now.
C
B
C
B
Yeah,
like
I
I,
imagine
it
would
be
nice
to
get
the
tutorials
out
of
the
documentation
like
it
just
takes
so
long.
The
other
thing
that
I
was
going
to
I
was
meaning
to
create
a
issue
on
this
and
that
I
I
really
want
to
work
towards
getting
a
lot
of
the
useless
items
that
are
in
the
name
space
as
in
like
useless.
As
far
as
a
user
is
concerned,
I
want
to
move
a
lot
of
them
to
Hidden
variables
like
things
like.
B
A
A
B
B
F
C
B
G
C
A
C
C
G
B
G
G
B
Yeah
so
I
generally,
we
create
create
a
like
a
staging
thing,
where
we
add
release,
notes
and
capture
that
sort
of
information
about
all
everything
that
was
happened
from
the
last
tag,
and
that
goes
into
the
release
notes,
and
then
it's
also
part
on.
So,
if
you
click
on
the
release
on
the
GitHub
website,
like
there's
the
releases
and
there's
ver
version
020
on
the
right
hand,
side
there,
if
you
click
on
that,
you'll
also
see
every
like
all
the
PRS
that
went
into
the
last
one
as.
C
B
B
G
G
B
G
B
G
C
C
D
D
But
basically,
mostly
for
trying
to
group
stuff
together
into
different
projects
like
okay
working
on
formal,
so
include
several
issues
related
to
that
project
or
working
with
like
fft
filters
and
Transformations.
That's
another
project
and
issues
to
that.
But
for
versions
I
usually
go
with
milon.
It's
really
easy,
then
to
say:
okay,
I
really
want
to
make
the
release.
What
is
needed
to
be
done
before
that,
and
you
have
a
list
of
those
Stu
that
sounds.
G
E
E
F
D
D
I
usually
don't
put
a
description
if
you
want
and
then
when
you
go
to
your
issues,
let's
say:
I
want
this
one
to
be
in
the
next
one
you
just
put
like
here
and
select
the
Milestone
you
wanted
and
then,
if
you
go
to
the
oh
sorry,
if
you
go
to
the
issues
then
to
the
whole
list,
you
can
filter
by
Mouse.
So
if
I,
if
I'm
about
to
release
0.6
I,
can
just
click
here
here
and
say:
okay,
what
needed
to
be
done
in
this
case.
C
B
C
A
D
D
E
G
Yeah
and
I
guess
the
advantage
of
project
is
that
we
can
keep
track
of
what's
under
review.
What's
what's
under
Dev
all
that
stuff,
but
then,
as
de
said,
we
have
to
be
diligent
to
be
using
it.
Otherwise
it's
too
much
for
what
we
want
so
I
guess
we
should
have
a
meeting
and
decide
what's
on
on
20
one
right
which
isues
all
the
bugs
picks
bugs
first
new
features
and
then
just
scope
it
out
next
six
months,
type
of
thing:
when
is.
B
G
It
well
I
mean
it's
easy
to
just
assign
issue
existing
issues
to
the
current.
You
know
you
create
all
your
Milestone
like
21,
22
23,
and
then
we
say
every
quarter
and
then
we
just
tag
like
this
is
top
priority
like
move
it
to
you
know,
and
then
we
fill
it
up
like
okay,
that's
enough
items
for
One
release
and
then
the
rest
can
go
down
to
the
next.
B
A
F
A
D
One
thing
we
could
do
is
create
an
issue
like
the
one.
You
mentioned,
something
like
a
meta
issue
with
like
just
ideas
like
broad
ideas,
and
you
can
list
up
in
GitHub
and
if
you
have
this
list
list,
they
create
like
this
button,
convert
to
issue,
that's
cool,
so
you
can
list
stuff
like
very
broadly
and
when
you
want
to
actually
describe
what
is
needed
to
be
done,
just
hit
that
button
cre
isue,
for
it.
C
F
C
G
C
B
G
A
Quarter
that
sounds
good
and
yeah
we
can
come
I
mean
I,
think
aiming
for
about
every
quarter
sounds
good
and
I.
Think
it's
fine,
if
there's
some
that
are
shorter
or
longer.
That's
also
fine
like,
for
example,
I
mean
bringing
in
John
Weiss's
mag
pte
stuff
would
be
great
to
have
that
prioritized
for
near
future
and
if
that's
a
small
release
on
its
own,
like
that's
also,
we
can
kind
of
scope
out
what
feels
appropriate
for
for
release
to
kind
of
balance.
The
timeline
and.
C
A
C
A
That
I've
got
a
couple
updates.
If
anybody
are
we
closed
on
that
topic
for
now,
yeah
I
started
drafting
a
statement,
Santi
and
Rona,
provided
some
input
for
website
analytics
we've
been
using
Google
analytics
in
the
past,
but
there's
a
lot
of
problems
with
that
and
moving
over
to
plausible
seems,
like
a
nice
thing
to
do
so,
we'll
put
in
a
propos
proposal
to
see
if
software
underground
is
willing
to.
Basically
let
us
use
some
slots
for
that.
A
They've
already
allowed
us
to
use
the
top
level
domain
for
S,
which
is
great
but
it'd,
be
nice
to
pull
the
Geo
siiz
sites
over
there.
One
of
the
things
that
it
brought
up
is
that
we
have
a
lot
of
subdomains
with
our
websites
and
each
subdomain
takes
up
a
different
slot
and
some
ways
it'
be
better
to
have
folders.
Is
that
like
it's
all,
just
one
website
and
I
think
it
does?
R
is
saying
too
that's
a
better
approach
for
like
search
ability
and
website,
crawlers
and
stuff
like
that.
A
So
that's
something
we
might
want
to
consider
like
switching
over
to
and
I'm
pretty
sure
it
should
be
straightforward
to
put
up
a
redirect
on
the
subdomains
to
like
map
us
to
the
right
folder.
But
that's
a
thing
we
can
start
to
make
some
issues
on
I
meant
to
do
that,
but
haven't
gotten
to
it.
But
if
that's
something
anybody's
interested
in
in
helping
tackle
it'
be
great.
If
we
can
put.
C
F
G
A
B
C
C
F
A
D
E
C
E
G
A
Yeah,
but
if
you
were
willing
to
provide
you
know
a
few
points
on
burs,
just
kind
of
quick
summary
and
we
can
write
up.
We
have
to.
We
owe
burs
a
report,
but
it
would
be
nice
to
actually
post
that
somewhere
too.
In
the
past
we
have
had
a
simpeg
Blog,
but
we
haven't
used
that
in
quite
a
while.
So
we
can
figure
out
a
place
to
put.