►
From YouTube: SimPEG meeting March 21
Description
SimPEG meeting March 21
A
A
It
would
be
really
useful
in
from
what
I
got
it
from
good
knee
one
of
the
goals
of
the
meeting
discussion
in
today's,
for
you
guys
to
find
out
what
my
experience
is:
not
being
a
user
and
I'm
happy
to
share
that
in
that
process,
all
probably
for
a
bunch
of
things,
I'm
sure,
yeah
I
think
it
would
be,
at
least
from
my
pretty
super
on
your
book
yeah.
So
we
can
plug
in
later.
I
guess
sure.
That's.
B
A
A
Oh
I
first
want
to
thank
you
guys
for
inviting
me
out,
because
I
really
really
enjoyed
working
with
smart
people,
and
all
of
you
definitely
follow
to
the
category
of
smart
people.
So,
and
that's
really
helpful
for
me
and
stimulating
for
me
to
be
real
with
the
people
who
are
doing
stuff
at
the
cutting
edge
like
in
my
opinion,
you
guys
are
there
on
the
cutting
edge.
A
So
so,
thanks
for
inviting
me-
and
you
know
many
thanks
to
DOM
and
a
good
me
both
for
helping
me
in
every
step
that
you
have
and
getting
me
up
to
speed,
running
good
daddy,
our
Lord
yeah,
but
so
just
a
little
tiny
bit
of
background.
For
those
of
you
who
don't
know
me
my
undergrad
degree
geophysics
and
then
after
that,
I
moved
on
and
did
geology
and
I
study
volcanoes
for
a
long
time.
A
And
then,
when
I
finished,
my
PhD
down
at
Seattle
University
of
Washington
I,
went
back
to
do
physics
because
the
place
is
to
get
a
job
was
with
G
visits
firms.
So
I
work
for
a
variety
of
geophysical
data
acquisition
companies
either
airborne
and
ground-based
acquisition
companies.
I've
worked
a
lot
on
the
side
of
geological
interpretation
of
geophysical
data
and
models,
and
that's
really
where
I
have
sat
for
most.
A
A
Right
and
so
I
guess
to
polish
off
my
background.
As
Don
knows,
I
work
for
four
years
at
mira,
Geoscience
and
so
was
involved
with
a
whole
array
of
projects
that
used
a
whole
bunch
of
different
types
of
geophysics
and
3d
one
day,
2d
or
3d
inversion
model
of
all
those
different
types
of
geophysics
and
then
try
to
get
a
geologic
interpretation
out
of
it.
A
It's
a
real
hard
sell
to
people
who
don't
understand
in
a
room.
Then
I've
never
considered
that
approach
before
what
is
the
best
approach,
as
you
guys
all
know,
there's
no
one
on
what
we
call
it:
the
Silver
Bullet
method,
so
we've
got
em
all
and
in
the
geothermal
industry
there
is
resistance
to
a
certain
extent
of
doing
things
in
three
dimensions.
But
luckily
you
guys
have
all
helped
create
the
tools
to
do
geophysics
in
three
dimensions
in
their
tool
to
do
geology
in
three
dimensions.
So
I
think
that's
direction.
A
So,
as
far
as
my
experience
with
synthetic,
it's
great
that
it's
originally
based
on
the
UBC
set
of
codes
because
for
anybody
who
I
talk
to
who
has
a
familiarity
with
BBC
and
the
codes
that
were
developed
over
many
years
by
Duggan,
I'm,
just
home,
hey
Cynthia!
Is
this
fantastic
thing?
That's
just
like
the
ebc
codes
based
on
the
same
equations
and
know-how
and
everything.
But
now
it's
open
source
that
grabs
people's
attention.
A
It
makes
them
interested
and
automatically
gives
it
some
street
cred,
which
is
good
and
and
I've,
talked
to
a
number
of
different
organizations
to
try
and
get
them
interested
because
I'm
in
a
musician.
Now
that,
if
I
want
to
do
more
of
these
projects,
I
got
to
get
anybody
else
interested
and
excited
about
it
and
if,
if
they
want
to
call
you
guys
up
and
interact
directly
to
use
something
on
their
own
or
adopted
and
use
it
on
themselves,
I
think
that's
a
win-win
for
everybody,
and
so
I've
talked
to
me
said.
A
Remember
I've
talked
to
the
US
Geological
Survey
on
the
Nevada
bureau
of
mines
and
geology,
which
is
the
state
geologic
survey
of
Nevada,
the
Utah
geologic
survey
and
in
those
three
group
I've
either
spoken
with
geophysicists,
who
work
with
them
or
with
very
chew
physics,
savvy
geologists,
who
want
G
physical
understanding
here
and
they've,
been
very
positive
about
medicine
case,
which
is
great.
I've
talked
to
the
Washington
State
Department
of
Natural
Resources,
which
is
sorta
state
survey
there.
They
don't
have
a
geophysicist
on
staff,
but
basic
value
on
pulse.
A
A
As
far
as
my
actual
user
experience,
so
I
learned
some
programming
back
in
the
university,
but
I'm
not
programmer
now,
and
so
Dom
has
helped
me
out
immensely
by
providing
me
with
some
scripts,
we'll
run
a
synthetic
version
and
then
it's
up
to
me
to
make
little
edits
to
it.
That
works
for
me
very
well
right
now.
I
can
imagine
that
for
some
people
that
might
not
work
because
they
might
get
scared
off
by
that
it
was
overwhelming.
A
A
A
But
as
far
as
once
it
does
work
on
my
machine,
it's
been
fantastic
because
I
can
end
in
the
fact
that
it
uses
standard
PVC
file
formats
is
great
because
I
can
create.
You
know
the
measure,
the
mesh
files
and
the
hots
files
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff
and
try
different
things
outside
I,
say
I.
Do
that
high
and
then
I'll
all
you
know
today
I'll
change,
the
I'll
change
the
grid
sites
on
the
mag
data
that
I'm
going
to
invert.
They
might
want
to
do.
Of
course.
Maybe
I
want
to
do
a
climb.
A
What's
going
to
look
like
for
the
difference
in
the
inversion
output-
and
I
can
do
that.
Imagine
anybody
else
can
do
that
as
well.
So
that's
not
a
that's,
not
a
showstopper
version,
which
is
pretty
mom
as
I
learn
more
about
what
changes
to
make
in
the
script.
Then
I
can
test
other
options,
whether
it's
changing
the
depth
waiting
or
changing
something
else,
because
there's
so
many
different
dials
to
turn
yeah
but
having
a
grocery
list.
B
G
E
E
H
H
B
It's
that
figuring
out
how
to
properly
explored
snobs,
because
one
of
the
things
well
I
mean
the
stuff
we've
done
with
the
objective
functions.
I
think
has
may
be
given
a
few
ideas
in
there,
so
we
recently
went
in
and
like
rewrote
how
we
formulate
up
the
English
problem
so
that
you
actually
can
go
in
and
start
thinking
about.
28
joint
version
and
those
kind
of
great.
G
B
F
A
H
That,
rather
the
question
several
times
now
in
the
last
couple
of
weeks
ago,
Jim
where's,
the
manual
ok
where's,
the
manual
too
good
yeah.
Is
that
sure
how
certain
people
interact
and
I
was
like?
Maybe
we'll
just
be
a
good
idea
to
compile
like
into
a
manual
at
some
point
with
like
staple
releases,
at
least
yeah
I
didn't
or
like
set
it
up
and
kind
of
more
of
a
I
have
a
manual
page.
G
B
Well,
I
mean
I,
think
it
a
lot
always
like
formalizing,
a
bit
of
how
we
state
the
problem,
things
that
we're
saving
one
of
the
things
that
I
found
in
setting
up
something
like
this.
So
this
is
actually
like
all
that
I
used
to
run
simulation
for
and
this
repos
kind
of
chaotic,
because
it
is
my
research
trupo,
but
trying
to
basically
state
where
my
different
assumptions
are,
because
that's
really
what
exposing
mobs
means.
It's
like
we're,
we're
all
of
the
assumptions
in
the
code.
B
So
in
this
case
like
not
exactly
great
name,
but
these
are
my
casing
parameters
and
doing
well
with
electromagnetics
and
scale
easy.
So
I
just
created.
Basically
a
way
to
set
up
like
here
are
all
my
primary
to
describe
a
pretty
standard
model
of
the
case
well,
in
a
later
space
based
on
that
then
building
a
mesh
and
then
whatever
kind
of
source
I
want
to
use.
B
And
then
that
was
you
want
to
save
and
so
I
think
that
there's
some
interesting
things
in
perhaps
trying
to
move
stating
both
the
forward
and
inverse
problem
in
terms
of
sets
of
parameters
and
basically
being
able
to
write
out
like
what
is
the
file
that
states
all
of
the
parameters
that
I
need
to
run
the
conversion.
When
what
is
my
grocery
list
for
the
inversion
yeah,
because
if
we
can
actually
standardized
out
of
it
and
write
that
out,
so
it
can
be
staged
recreated
in
all
of
those
from
the
things.
A
Clarify
where
the
assumptions
aren't
I
did
I
mention
that
as
a
newbie
I
did
read,
the
paper
was
at
the
2015.
They
were
yeah
and
I
found
a
very
helpful,
very
insightful,
but
I
didn't
feel
that
that
had
the
grocery
diskin
right
yeah,
but
that
was
great.
If
not
would
recommend
anybody
wants
to
start
with
soon
pick
to
read
that
paper,
because
it
provides
the
overview
yeah.
A
F
Funny
cuz,
you
can
I
going
to
do
the
way,
the
input
file
to
know
that
the
DBC
users
and
but
you're
right,
the
instead
of
a
being
aesthetically
put
about
it,
could
just
be
a
dictionary
like
JSON
I,
and
you
just
like
add
as
many
as
many
arguments
as
you
want.
Referring
to
that
shopping
lips
like
I,
want
to
hit
this
one.
This
one,
this
one
just
add
them
all
up
yeah
and
then
some
approaches
how
bout
that
all
and
run
before
yeah.
B
And
guess
what
that
looks
like
in
terms
of
this
is
again
a
little.
You
could
shape
the
match
and
so
yeah
what
this
looks
like
is,
you
know
you
document
each
of
your
properties.
These
are
the
things
that
I
need
to
save
to
recreate
it.
So
my
cell
sizes,
all
that
kind
of
stuff,
and
then
we
can
actually
click
here's
all
of
the
instructions
that
I
need
to
create
a
match
and
then
I
can
just
go
and
basically
take
those
and
build
the
mesh.
So.
C
A
H
H
G
When
one
of
the
drivers
of
that
is
an
open
remaining
data
format,
which
was
cotton,
I
n
from
a
global
mining,
androids
group,
the
G
msg,
so
there's
that
acronym
the
open
mining
format
is
something
that
we're
working
a
lot
of
vendors
in
the
mining
space
to
try
and
get
more
consistency
around
data
transfers
between
the
various
packages
I'm.
So
over
the
past
sort
of
six
months,
we've
gotten
to
a
version
like
a
0.9
which
supports
like
point
clouds
and
drill
holes
and
surfaces
and
tensor
meshes
or
regular
block
models.
G
So
it's
it's
a
pretty
cool
place
and
there's
sort
of
a
lot
more
buy-in
at
the
moment
from
some
of
the
big
vendors,
including
like
leapfrog
and
some
of
the
other
mining
mining
vendors.
So
that's
that's
something.
That
else
is
that
that
is
sort
of
on
the
horizon,
and
one
of
the
sort
of
bleed
overs
of
that
work
is
a
really
good
serialization
format
that
Franklin
has
sort
of
generalized
into
the
properties
repository,
and
so
that
means
that
we
can
potentially
take
advantage
of
some
of
that
serialization
work
just
by
implementing
properties
throughout
the
code.
G
As
cute
lou
was
saying,
and
that
gives
us
better
documentation
exposes
some
of
the
like
the
knobs
that
Jeff
you
were
asking
for,
and
it
also
like
errors,
if
you
don't
put
a
doc
string
in
it,
so
you
can't
actually
write
the
code
like
the
developer,
can't
write
the
code
until
they
documented
their
stuff,
which
is
a
good
thing.
So
so
that's
that's
just
like
some
of
the
things
that
are
on
the
go
from
my
end
and
yeah.
I
G
A
B
Are
people
who
are
involved
at
Colorado,
School
of
Mines
rom,
and
so
there's
like
and
particular
Joe
capriati
has
been
contributing
some
code,
the
people
that
I
think
that
are
using
it
or
at
least
sort
of
keeping
tabs.
You
see,
there's
a
couple
people
who
are
interested
so
it's
starting
starting
to
make
its
way
out.
That's
great
yeah,
yeah.
A
G
E
B
A
F
A
You
for
visual
tation,
yes,
I'm
using
Geoscience
analyst
and
a
3d
design.
Software
called
rhino,
okay
rhinos,
a
software
company
in
Seattle,
and
they
make
a
software
where
you
can
build
anything.
It's
used
for
jewelry
making
boatbuilding.
Oh
really,
oh
about
anything,
yeah
and
so
yeah.
It
originally.
A
So
I,
I
use
Geoscience
analysts
because
it's
so
easy
to
load,
geoscience
datasets
call
the
file
formats
are
pretty
much
there
geoscience
a
nose,
but
you
can't
build
anything
and
so
I
build
stuff
in
3d,
like
three
fault
surfaces,
topography,
interpretation
of
the
chief
physical
model
or
my
field,
all
that
in
rhino
and
then
I
can
visualize
it
in
either
platform.
Yeah
like,
for
example,
rhino.
You
can
never
import
a
GS
off-grid
file.
Unless
you
wrote
your
own,
you
know
thing
to
imported,
so
yeah
I,
just
as
well
as
needed
in
rhino.
A
A
And
I
haven't
used
it,
but
my
understanding
is,
you
can
build
anything
in
and
what
I've
seen
that's
great
about
these
3d
design
suffers
your
your
screens
divided
up
into
four
one.
Is
the
perspective
view
yeah,
and
then
you
have
the
top
down
the
right
side
and
the
left
side?
Okay,
so
you
always
know
exactly
where
you
are
in
3d
space,
because
if
you
just
have
one
view
of
the
perspective
view,
it's.
E
B
A
A
Amazing
yeah,
yes
yeah,
so
I've
been
really
happy
with
that.
So
far,
I'm,
certainly
not
an
expert
user
of
it,
but
I
I
took
a
chance
in
getting
the
software
and
so
far
I
have
not
gone
into
a
showstopper
yeah,
which
I'm
really
ask
you
about
real
nice
in
the
company.
A
big
I
think
they're
a
Geoscience
consulting
firm
attask,
guys
ever
heard
the
Tasca.
They
do
all
kinds
of
stuff
from
open-pit.
My
modeling
in
Seoul
stability.
Studies
like
you
know
the
finite
element,
slope,
stability,
technical
stuff
and
they
do
underground
mine
modeling.
A
A
Like
what's
the
likes
a
degenerate
model,
if
you
like
to
see
or
mad
heavy
use
like?
Oh
it's
just
a
format,
I
think
they
call
it
just
3d
em
or
something
like
that.
It's
there
to
own
file
format,
but
you
can
export
the
note
dxf
files
and
then
you
can
import
that
in
vacuums.
And
yes,
it
thanks.
Oh
Randall
is
beautiful.
Yeah
yeah,
so
I've
tried
try
to
limit
myself
to
GIS
shapefiles
text
files,
dxf
files
and
rates,
the
occasional
surfer,
read,
file
and
I.
A
F
A
Yeah
but
thousand
bucks,
I
name
Triton,
the
dirty
I
haven't
yet
and
if
I
would
have
found
out
about
blender
before
Rhino
I
I
probably
would
have
tried
it.
What
I've
read
on
the
internet
is
blender,
it
has
less
documentation
and
it's
a
little
bit
more
about
it.
Steep
learning
curve,
okay,
hello,
every
night
and.
G
H
H
A
Yeah
one
of
the
things
about
rhino
and
it's
3d
visualization
of
geoscience
stuff-
is
some
that
it's
really
first
generated
surfaces:
okay
and
what
I've
done
to
try
and
have
it.
Visualize
block
walls
is
first,
we
imported
a
standard,
PVC
block
model
and
we
manually
built.
We
wrote
a
little
script
to
do
this,
but
man
would
manually
built
196,000,
6
I
did
cubes
and
colored
the
surfaces
of
those
hundred.
Ninety
six
thousand
cubes
was
really.
I
A
But
work
yeah
and
they
have
a
slicer
tool,
so
you
can
kind
of
slice
it
and
Pam
through
and
look
at
it
as
yet.
But
what
we're
doing
now
is
we're
just
importing
it
as
a
point
cloud
and
then
you
color
the
points
and
then
in
the
new
version
of
raw
know,
you
can
actually
create
those
points
either
as
spheres
which
would
be
fine,
but
you
can
also
create
them
as
cues,
which
act
as
a
point
rather
than
a
six-sided
surface.
A
A
Essentially,
the
geology
out
in
this
portion
of
central
Nevada
is
a
three
layer
of
surficial
sediments
and
then
tertiary,
volcanic
rocks
and
then
crystalline
basement
rocks,
and
the
idea
is
to
better
understand
what
the
structure
faulting
and
georgia
goofy
variations
are
in
a
mood
probably
like
the
final
five.
A
five
kilometer
area
and
they've
got
three
kilometer
deep
wells
in
this
area.
A
This
will
have
some
down
hole,
geologic
constraints,
we're
going
to
collect
density
data
from
brought
types,
and
the
surrounding
mountain
ranges
that
we
believe
are
the
similar
pathologies
to
what
we
find
underground
yeah,
so
we'll,
hopefully
constrain
the
density,
at
least
in
a
relative.
The
good
sense
and
there's
going
to
be
seismic
lines,
so
we'll
use
the
interpreted
seismic
lines
to
try
and
find
some
horizons
and
create
some
initial
starting
surfaces
so
that
the
immersion
modeling
will
start
with
the
geologic
framework,
which
is
closest
to
reality.
A
E
B
That
would
be
very
exciting,
too
and
I'd
be
certainly
very
interested.
Keeping
the
loop
on
that
and
see
I
mean
cuz,
there's
a
lot
of
things,
I
think
pushing
on
data
more
and
especially
bringing
in
a
priori
knowledge
from
seismic
and
geologic
settings.
That's
not
something
we
pushed
really
hard
on
yet.
So
it
would
be
great
to
get
your
thoughts
and
let
use
this
as
a
bit
of
a
scenario
to
to
bring
that
game
up.
That.
A
Would
be
great,
the
vision
that
I
have
is
I
can
take
the
interpreted
3d
seismic
waves,
post
and
vertically
in
Rana
and
I
just
digitized.
You
know
the
horizon
weights
yeah
and
then
I'll
just
connect
them
up
yep.
You
can
do
that
in
my
not
build
anything
in
3d
and
then
I'll
export
those
services
as
dxf
and
then,
where
I'm
going
to
need
some
assistance.
Is
your
print
well
everybody's
presentation
about
that
mining,
striker
diamond
project
go
scripts?
A
Are
you
have
you
created
a
three-dimensional
geologic
model
with
different
domains
and
head
you,
and
then
you
use
that
to
guide
the
inversion
process,
and
so
that
was
fantastic
for
me
to
see
that,
because
I
thought
this
can
be
done
and
so
I
want
to
do
something
and
similar,
and
we
start
out
with
it.
You're
a
geologic
model
operate
with
different
physical
properties
and
then
do
for
modeling
yep,
and
then
maybe
do
some
adjustments
to
the
surfaces
which
I
can
easily
do
in
trial
and
then
do
it
again
me
well
yeah.
So
I
should
ask.
I
G
F
A
G
A
The
density
contrast
between
the
tertiary
volcanic
sand,
layer,
2
and
the
crystalline
basement
in
layer
3
that
destra
contrast
may
be
small
right,
and
one
of
the
goals
of
the
project
is
that
the
crystalline
basement
is
so
much
different.
Rock
types
it
can
be
making
metamorphic
rocks
port
site
or
granite
is
always
right
and
they're
drilling
objective
is
to
target
one
of
those
are
all
types
and
not
another
right.
A
B
E
A
H
I
A
H
H
F
H
A
H
A
A
Been
curious,
I
think
it's
a
generational
thing
and
it's
a
it's
really
curious,
because
one
of
the
standard
things
you
do
in
geothermal
energy
development
is
you
create
a
three-dimensional
heat
and
fluid
flow
model?
So
you
got
all
your
wells
right
and
water
is
going
to
be
flowing
between
all
the
wells
as
you
pump
cold
water
down
and
suck
up
water
out,
and
you
want
to
be
able
to
predict
what
the
temperature
decline
is
in
that
reservoir
as?
U
haul
water
everything.
A
So
every
industry
accepts
that
you
do
that
in
three
dimensions
in
with
time,
they've
also
accepted
to
surge
agree
that
you
should
really
do
your
MP
modeling
in
three
dimensions,
but
for
some
reason
it
completely
falls
flat.
When
you
tell
people
you
can
do
mag
and
gravity
in
3d
too
yeah,
most
of
them
just
either
a
satisfied
with
looking
at
maps
of
data
or
the
occasional
2deg
emphasis
section.
A
I
A
Yeah
on
my
part
of
it,
as
is
as
I
said,
generational
part
of
it
is
a
software
issue
in
the
companies
are
reluctant
to
go
3d
because
they
don't
want
to
spend
huge
sums
of
money
to
buy.
You
know
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
software.
This
comes
out
of
the
oil
and
gas
industry,
for
example,
on
a
few
chemical.
We
simply
don't
have
that
kind
of
money
in
folks
haven't
really
learned
yet
that
there
are
other
lower
cost
options.
A
A
C
A
If
you
get
somebody
who's
savvy
enough
who
says
who
yeah
I
can
see
the
value
of
doing
three-dimensional
version,
modeling
of
gravity
and
magnetic
oh,
but
we
never
collected
any
density
or
mex
us
data
and
I
really
like
to
be
able
to
constrain
it
with
real
rock
property
measurements,
but
we
don't
have
that
they
just
want
not
going
to
do
it,
because
the
people
who
are
savvy
enough
will
say
well,
you
know
yeah
totally
unconstrained
inversion.
Modeling
is
okay,
but
I
want
to
do
it
better
than
that.
A
Oh,
but
I
don't
have
the
data
that
I
need
to
really
do
it
right,
so
I'm
not
going
to
doing
so
getting
people
to
more
routinely
collect
density,
mex
us
from
conductivity
measurements
as
something
that
you
just
do
is
is
I,
think
a
road
that
we
have
to
travel
down,
keep
plugging
so
I.
Think
I
mean
it.
Don't
the
time
effectiveness.
H
Honey
yeah,
actually
I,
don't
even
know
what
it
is,
but
that's
what
everyone
asked
me,
the
analytic
that
they
want
to
play:
modeling,
danik,
nothing
where
you
just
go
when
you
just
fit
spikes
your
data,
so
I
mean
what
it
has
value.
It
gives
a
lot
of
intuition
into
the
day
level.
If
you
want
more
details,
I
think.
H
The
equivalents
first,
commercial,
which
is
just
like
one
layer,
but
just
when
he
made
the
point
that
you
can
now
go
from
Millie
goals
that
nobody
understands.
What
is
two
densities
yeah
it
just
like.
Does
the
energy
in
the
room
change
no
I
just
have
hockey
like
we
just
saw
the
balance
yeah
because
ever
primarily
geologist
yes
in
the
room
yeah
with
your
faces
defeating,
then
you
make.
H
A
A
I
have
to
talk
about
density
in
order
for
really
communicating
with
the
geology
audience
so
that
they
say
oh
quota,
yeah
2.6,
the
probably
around
granite
2.2
yeah,
that's
shale,
so
that
they
can
immediately
think
in
terms
of
rocks,
and
I
think
that's
how
I
really
got
through
is
to
make
it
as
close
to
rocks
as
possible.
Yeah.
F
A
H
It's
same
same
for
me
like
I,
can't
talk
about
conductivity
as
a
mom
I
respectively.
Okay,
like
if
it's
a
conductivity
I
mean
even
I,
don't
always
understand
what
I'm
talking
about
like,
because
you
just
so
used
to
time
to
matters
yeah,
but
I
always
inverted
and
make
all
my
mother's
conductivity
right
so
somewhere.
Some
other
and
I
always
talk
about
frequencies
above
and
periods
below,
Nelson
yeah,
like.
H
I
H
G
So
I
was
sort
of
like
just
taking
notes,
while
Jeff
was
talking,
which
was
like
really
fun
to
hear
both
the
onboarding
sort
of
side
of
things.
What
tools
you're
using
a
little
sort
of
we're
like
are
our
efforts
fit
into
the
sort
of
the
wider
community,
which
is
always
always
a
really
fun
thing
to
hear
so
I
shared
that
talk
on
this
impact
general
slack.
Hopefully
everyone
has
access
to
that
yeah
yeah.
So
that's
that
should
be
cool
and
I.