►
From YouTube: GitLab 15.6 Kickoff - Verify:Pipeline Execution
Description
Kickoff Page: https://about.gitlab.com/direction/kickoff/#verify
Ops Direction: https://about.gitlab.com/direction/ops/#verify
Issues Discussed:
UI for Inbound CI_JOB_TOKEN - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/375782
Configure CI/CD quota - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/362287
Improve workflow for finding a project to set quota - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/366929
We love feedback and you can reach me at jheimbuck@gitlab.com or mention me on GitLab.com using @jheimbuck_gl
A
Hi
welcome
to
the
verified
pipeline
execution,
15
6
kickoff.
My
name
is
James
heinbach
product
manager
for
the
pipeline
execution
group
here
at
gitlab.
As
a
reminder,
this
group
is
responsible
for
gitlab
CI
pipelines,
pipeline
processing,
as
well
as
the
category
of
merch
trains
and
I'm
joined
today,
as
always
by
our
product.
Designer
vitica
you'll
find
a
link
to
the
156
kickoff
page
with
links
to
these
items
and
the
verify
stage,
Direction
page
with
discussion
of
our
larger
future
work.
In
the
comments
below
the
video.
A
You
can
always
reach
me
at
jheimbook,
gitlab.com
or
by
tagging
me
in
a
comment
on
any
of
the
issues
with
group
pipeline
execution
as
the
label
in
the
gitlab
project.
So
I'm
already
sharing
our
planning
issue
and
you
can
see
our
theme.
Here
is
improving
pipeline
security,
so
we
have
a
couple
of
goals
for
our
Milestone.
A
The
first
is
meeting
our
reliability
slos
for
all
of
our
verified
peabots
and
as
a
reminder,
we
use
the
verified
P1
label
to
indicate
top
priority
issues,
things
that
we
really
want
to
deliver
and
that
might
be
due
to
service
level
objectives
that
we're
trying
to
hit
around
bugs
or
security
or
availability
type
of
issues,
and
that
really
ensures
that
we
have
a
reliable
and
stable
platform
which
maps
to
our
larger
investment
theme
for
the
year
across
all
the
product
for
a
gitlab
hosted
first
investment
theme,
so
we
have
a
number
of
verified
p1s.
A
A
few
of
those
are
confidential
and
the
one
that
we're
going
to
really
dig
into
today,
both
vedica
and
I,
is
the
new
interface
for
the
inbound
CI
job
token,
and
that
is
our
next
goal-
is
delivering
the
next
issues
in
Phase,
1.1
of
RCI,
gitlab
or
sorry,
CI,
job,
token,
workflow,
epic
and
that's
creating
the
new
interface.
For
that
inbound
token.
A
So
back
in
144
we
set
up
and
created
the
secure
token
for
external,
so
you
can
decide
which
jobs,
your
CI
job,
token
or
sorry,
which
projects
or
CI
job
token
could
work
with
to
restrict
that
access.
This
flips
that
to
restrict
inbound
tokens,
so
only
tokens
for
the
projects
that
you
allow
would
have
any
sort
of
access
into
your
project.
A
So
this
creates
the
UI
for
that
and
both
of
these
things
are-
or
this
is
anticipation
of
making
security
not
only
default
but
only
option
as
in
160,
and
so
we'll
have
a
deprecation
notice
soon
about
that
of
the
insecure
or
not
insecure
option.
But
the
non-limited
option
is
not
available
at
all
for
projects
and
that
will
be
in
160..
A
So
those
are
the
the
themes
and
the
big
goals.
Some
of
the
issues
that
I
wanted
to
talk
through
today
and
so
now
I'll
hand
it
over
to
vedica
to
discuss
some
of
the
upcoming
usability
improvements.
The
team
is
exploring
for
later
this
year.
B
Thank
you,
James
yeah,
first
I
would,
even,
though,
we're
making
mostly
making
progress
on
the
configuring
cicd
quota
for
groups,
projects
under
crews
in
this
Milestone,
but
since
teams
just
talked
about
the
ca
job
token
inbound,
workflow,
I
thought
I
would
just
like
give
a
quick
glimpse
of
that
and
talk
about
it
with
you.
So
yeah
as
you
can
see,
there's
a
whole
new
workflow
that
has
been
added
to
this
page
to
the
section.
B
That
is,
that
would
allow
you
to
kind
of
like
check,
which
are
the
projects
that
have
access
to
your
projects
using
their
CI
job
tokens,
and
you
can
really
control
that
from
here.
You
can
also
remove
projects
or
give
them
permission
like.
As
per
your
requirement.
B
We
still
have
the
outbound
one
like
in
this
proposal,
because
we
did
not
want
to
make
this
particular
like
implementation
of
breaking
change,
so
that's
going
to
be
there
for
a
while
and
then
slowly
that
would
be
moved
out
yeah.
This
is
that,
and
we
would
love
to
hear
more
about,
like
here's,
some
feedback
about
this
once
this
is
rolled
out
now.
Moving
on
to
configuring
cicd
quota
for
projects
under
groups-
I
talked
about
this
earlier
as
well
in
the
previous
kickoff
that
we
first
worked
on
configuring.
B
The
quota
for
projects
under
name
spaces.
That
was
our
first
step
and
we
took
that
step
because,
like
we
first
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
are
moving
in
the
right
direction
and
we
just
thought
it's,
it's
a
good
first
step
to
start
with
name
spaces
username
spaces
rather
than
groups.
B
Now
it
will
be
working
on
the
design
for
the
group
part
of
this
exercise,
and
since
we
have
some
information
from
the
previous
validation
resource
that
we
ran
for
the
previous
solution,
we
would
be
making
some
correction
to
the
workflow,
and
we
are
also
pairing
this
effort
with
another
issue.
B
So
in
the
next
tab,
you
see
that
there's
this
issue
that
says
improve
workflow
for
finding
a
product
to
set
code
offer
one
of
the
things
that
we
learned
from
our
validation
research
is
that
users
do
not
have
a
lot
of
products
directly
under
their
username
space,
but
that's
very
different
for
our
groups,
of
course.
So,
just
because,
just
before
we
move
the
solution
to
the
group
level,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
our
users
are
able
to
find
projects
from
a
long
list
of
projects.
So
we
would
also
be
improving.
B
This
particular
feature
that
we
have
for
searching
for
a
project
from
a
very
long
list
and
then
setting
a
quota
or
editing
a
quota
for
that
now.
Once
these
two
proposals
are
in
place,
we
would
be
taking
them
to
validate
with
our
users,
of
course,
and
that's
all
from
me.
A
Thanks
vetica
we're
really
excited
for
15
6..
If
any
of
these
issues
are
interesting
to,
you
feel
free
to
tag
us
in
those
issues
or
you
can
reach
out
to
me
anytime,
at
jheimbuck
gitlab.com
thanks.