►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Yep
your
tweets,
I
think.
Last
week
there
was
a
tweet
storm.
You
commented
on
how
remote
work
can
contribute
to
doubling
global
gdp,
and
that
got
me
thinking
at
what
point
does
it
make
sense
for
git
lab
to
have
a
non-profit
foundation
kind
of
like
twilio
org
that
can
write
grants
and
otherwise
to
support
your
bigger
vision
even
beyond
remote.
A
A
B
Yeah,
I
was
just
going
to
add
one
context
thing
I
know
about
twilio.
Is
they
had
employees
run
the
non-profit,
so
they
think
they
funded
all
of
the
head
count.
So
maybe
that's
one
thing
to
consider
is
like
it's
a
separate
entity
for
reasons
but
yeah
like
how
do
you
keep
the
culture
the
same?
Maybe
it's
the
same
people
running
both
but
yeah.
I
I
definitely
have
a
person
you
can
talk
to
if
you
want
to
explore
it
more.
A
B
A
Yeah,
very
california,
but
I
try
to
work
out
in
the
morning
this
morning
I
worked
out
with
a
trainer
with
and
with
karen.
So
with
the
three
of
us
that
was
great
and
if
that's
not
it,
I
go
stand
on
an
elliptical
and
watch
youtube
while
doing
it
at
twice
the
speed,
mostly
people
reviving
old
machinery
and
stuff,
like
that,
sometimes
some
some
company
videos,
like
a
group
conversation
or
a
key
meeting
prep
and
then
for
the
rest.
A
I
I
find
that
if
you
have
that
many
meetings,
it
becomes
very
reactional
like
I.
I
cannot
I'm
interrupt
driven.
I
there's
not
the
space
to
do
anything
so
this
morning
I
always
make
time
for
family,
and
I
schedule
that
this
yesterday,
my
parents
canceled
on
me
totally
fine.
We
called
on
sunday,
but
I
find
that
I
just
was
lying
in
bed
watching
tick
tock,
instead
of
doing
anything
useful.
So
at
some
some
point
the
meetings
become
a
bit
of
a
crutch
to
where
to
to
achieve
anything,
you
schedule
a
meeting
to
do
it.
C
A
A
A
A
I
think
the
bartek
is
doing
a
great
job,
getting
incubation
engineering
off
the
crowd,
so
we've
hired
for
a
few
positions
there.
I
think
that's
going
to
be
a
big
lever
going
forward,
ensuring
that
getlab
will
keep
kind
of
being
able
to
kind
of
provide
more
value
to
to
our
customers
so
really
excited
about
that
and
the
world
around
us.
A
lot
is
happening.
I
think
one
purchase
that
happened
this
weekend
or
like
late
last
week,
was
that
graffana
teamed
up
with
k6.
I
think
we're
we're
using
k6
at
gitlab.
A
C
A
Thanks
so
far,
the
first
person
doing
it
as
an
as
an
external
since
we
opened
it
up,
has
been
april
malone.
She
supports
me
my
personal
life
kind
of
my
eba,
my
personal
life,
and
it
was
a
great
experience
for
her.
She
really
liked
it
she's
better
able
to
support
me.
She
did
remark
that
I
was
pretty
consistent
between
how
I
work,
how
I
did
how
I
ran
that
and
gitlab.
So
that
was
good
to
hear,
and
I
think
the
very
interesting
opportunity
is
that
we're
prioritizing
customers.
A
So
I
think
that's
that
might
be
really
interesting
if
we
can
get
customers
to
kind
of
look
into
gitlab.
I
think
most
of
the
time,
if
you
get
to
know
something
better,
you
like
it
more
afterwards,
so
I
think
that's
a
great
opportunity,
I'm
not
sure
what
whether
there's
someone
on
the
call
who
knows
how
much
interest
there's
been
so
far.
E
A
I
think
they're
really
important.
I
think
that
one
post-purchase
survey
doesn't
make
summer,
I'm
not
sure,
that's
an
expression
in
english,
two
that
I'm
butchering
right
now,
but
I
think
the
our
secure
capabilities
are
driving
most
of
the
ultimate
purchasing
today
and
I
think
they
will
also
do
so
in
the
future.
I
think.
A
That's
because
of
a
couple
of
reasons:
it's
because
security
is
super
important
to
customers.
It's
getting
more
important
that
you
can
look
to
the
the
guidelines
from
dubai
in
administration,
for
example.
The
second
thing
is
they're
really
hard
to
integrate
into
the
devops
life
cycle,
so
kind
of
our
single
application
really
shines.
A
The
third
is
that
a
lot
of
the
secure
capabilities
are
monetized
and
they
were
added
relatively
recently,
so
we're
able
to
put
them
in
ultimate
where
kind
of
ultimate
didn't
exist.
When
we
monetize
some
of
the
other
capabilities
and
we
don't,
we,
we
don't
move
stuff
out
of
the
open
source
version
and
we
try
not
to
shift
too
much
around
because
it's
it's
not
great
for
customers.
So
I
think,
for
those
three
reasons
I
see
the
current.
A
I
explain
the
current
success,
but
I
I
see
all
state
continue
in
the
future,
but
it
is
encouraging
that
it's
not
just
secure
anymore,
so
nothing,
nothing
taking
it
and
what
we're
seeing
is
not
that
the
security
is
becoming
less
important.
It's
just
that
something
else
is
also
coming
important
and
the
growth
rate
of
ultimate
shows
that
it's
it's
additive.
It's
not
it's
not!
That
secure
is
decreasing.
It's
just
that
there's
now
more
power
behind
it.
A
B
I
guess
when
you
mention
it,
helps
us
sell
ultimate.
I
get
this
idea
in
my
mind
that
these
are
all
bigger
companies
buying
these
features,
but
actually
don't
know.
If
that's
true,
so
I
was
wondering
if
you
would
express
a
little
bit
about
kind
of
what
you
think
the
adoption
journey
for
secure
will
be
like.
When
does
it
go
down
market
into
smb
or
how
you
think
about
who
buys
it.
A
A
A
That
is
probably
more
prevalent
amongst
smaller
companies,
because
it's
easier
for
them
to
switch.
If
you're
already
entrenched
with
an
existing
plan,
software
it's
harder
to
switch
and
the
bigger
companies
tend
to
be,
it
tends
to
be
super
prevalent.
There's
a
lot
of
workflow
set
up,
so
that
might
also
be
one
of
the
reasons
that
plan
is
now
coming
up
in
the
post-purchase
survey
and
it's
kind
of
on
an
equal
footing.
A
If
you
look
at
the
frequency,
I
think
if
you
look
at
revenue,
probably
security
is
driving
a
lot
more
revenue,
but
because
it's
smaller
companies
kind
of
buying
ultimate
for
plan,
they
have
a
smaller
order
size,
but
they
have
more
like
relatively
more
orders
compared
to
the
revenue.
So
that's
why,
in
frequency
order
frequency,
which
is
the
post-purchase
survey,
you
see
both
on
equal
footing,
that's
my
thesis.
I
don't
have
data
to
back
that
up.