►
From YouTube: 14.5 Create:Code Review prioritization exercise
A
B
C
C
We've
had
family
in
all
weekend
and
then
yeah.
What's
going
on.
A
Let's,
let's
hope
that
by
the
end
of
this
we're
all
feeling
even
better,
so
let
me
share
my
screen,
so
I
added
these
five
issues.
Most
of
them
we
have
already
discussed
in
the
past,
so
it
might
be
quick
for
us
to
go
through
them.
A
This
one
keeps
coming
back
and
it
came
back
again
I
think
last
month
or
so
I
stumbled
across,
I
think
at
least
one
or
two
people
that
were
talking
about
this
users
that
were
mentioning
this
needs,
not
necessarily
the
solution,
but
that
they
were
facing
this
problem,
and
we
already
looked
into
this
in
the
past
and
tried
to
make
progress
on
it
to
show
the
lines
that
were
changed
in
a
subsequent
commit,
instead
of
having
to
navigate
to
the
new
version
of
the
diff
yeah.
C
What
happened
with
this
andre
because
justin
was
working
on
it
and
then
he
left?
Was
it
like
close
to
done
or
was
it
like
incredibly
problematic.
B
Yeah
I'm
trying
to
wrap
my
head
around
where
we
left
off.
I
think
I
took
some
notes
at
the
time.
I
still
think
that
we
had
some
work
to
do
so.
I
think
there's
still
some
unknowns
here
and
let
me
see
yeah,
I
think,
there's
still
some
unknowns
here
and
both
in
the
back
and
front
end.
B
Back,
I
don't
think
we
had
any
progress
since
we
last
chatted
about
this
five
months
ago.
The
only
difference
like
we
have
some
customer
activity
right,
so
we
took
some
stabs
at
this.
This
was
far
more
complex
than
we
expected.
I
think
right
now.
What
needs
to
be
done
here
is
just
we
go
at
it
again.
We
have
some
merge
requests
already
starting
starting
work,
but
we
didn't
merge
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
we
closed.
C
B
It
was
kind
of
a
dead
end
yeah,
it's
called
it's
not
merged,
and
I
think
that's
where
we
we
should
pick
up
from
is
like
look
at
the
code,
get
ourselves
acquainted
with
the
problem
again
and
I
think
at
the
time
the
problem
was
dealing
with
all
the
versioning
and
making
sure
that
we
had
the
com
the
right
comparison
to
show
off
the
lines,
but
that's
always
computed
on
the
back
end.
So
yes,
this
would
be
requiring
some
back-end
support
so
yeah.
A
Okay
yeah
anyway,
I
think
we're
all
aware
of
the
reach
impact
and
confidence
that
we
have
here.
Although
the
confidence
on
the
solution
technically
the
technical
part
of
the
solution,
I
assume
it's
not
very
high
because
we
encountered
a
lot
of
problems
while
trying
to
fix
this
but
yeah.
If
anyone
has
questions
about
this
issue,
let
me
know-
and
you
can
interrupt
next
issue-
is
use
viewed,
state
from
file
header
in
mrs
file
browser
so
yeah
right
now.
We
bold
all
of
the
file
names
in
the
file
browser
and
merge
requests.
A
So
yeah.
I
think
it's
not
a
lot
of
reach
and
I
don't
think
it's.
It's
a
very
big
impact.
I
think
it's
more
of
a
aesthetic
thing
than
anything.
It
helps
when
viewing
a
large
merge
request.
I
don't
think
I
don't
think
it's
a
huge
impact
so
anyway
yeah
I
wanted
to
know
if
you
have
any
questions
or
thoughts
about
this
one
front
end
only.
C
Had
we
previously
when
we
previously
talked
about
this,
I
think
we
talked
about
blocking
it
on
an
api
right
like
because
the
the
next
step
was
to
add
the
graphql
api
to
make
the
viewed
state
sort
of
persistent
and
give
us
a
way
to
use
it
in
multiple
places.
I
think
my
I
think
this
is
fine.
I
think
the
logical
question
is
going
to
be
like
if
I
click
on
a
file
on
the
file
tree,
is
it
gonna
click?
The
check
box
in
the
ui
like?
C
Are
those
two
things
going
to
be
related
in
a
way
that
makes
sense
and
then
like
how
easy
is
the
two-way
javascript
communication
back
and
forth
gonna
be
between
those
two
things
to
like
keep
that
together
is
sort
of
my
concern
with
this
one
without
the
api,
I
think
we're
just
going
to
like
open
ourselves
up
to
try
and
catch
all
these
edge
cases
for
a
while.
B
B
Whenever
we
update
the
code
from
now
relying
on
the
local
client-side
storage
to
rely
on
that,
you
will
be
focused
on
the
checkbox,
so
we
don't
at
that
time.
We
won't
even
have
to
worry
about
this,
because
that
will
be
looking
at
that
checkbox
state
and
as
long
as
we
update
the
code
that
updates
that
to
come
from
the
end
and
not
from
the
client-side
store
and
just
change
the
store.
Basically,
this
will
automatically
work
as
expected.
B
So
I
don't
think
I
do
get
your
point,
but
I
don't
think
in
this
case
would
be
more
complex
later.
If
we
have
this
now.
A
A
A
All
right
this
one,
I
think
this
one
we
can
kind
of
skip,
because
it
will
require
back-end
work,
but
anyway,
this
is
I'm
passionate
about
this
issue.
Well,
not
sold
on
the
solution
itself,
but
just
making
some
progress
here
on
having
less
and
less
auto
collapsed
files,
so
yeah,
maybe
in
the
future,
we'll
get
to
it
this
one.
I
think
at
some
point
yeah.
C
A
We
thought
it
was
just
front
ends
and
the
idea
is
that
it's
not
updating
the
counter
of
the
commits.
A
When,
for
example,
you
go
through
the
flow
of
editing
a
file
in
a
merge
request,
then
you
go
back
to
the
merge
request
immediately
after
you
submit
changes
in
the
single
file
editor,
for
example,
and
the
commits
tab
has
the
wrong
counter
number
for
the
number
of
commits.
It
still
says
one
for
example,
in
this
case,
there's
only
one
commit
in
this
image.
B
Yeah,
I
think
yeah
there's
a
race
condition
here
on
the
back
end,
because
when
you
submit
the
editing
again,
this
only
happens
when
you're
fresh
off
editing
the
file
of
this
branch.
You
come
back
to
the
emr
directly.
B
The
solution,
I
think
I
probably
proposed,
is
then
to
when
rendering
the
commits
list
being
given
an
information
about
how
many
commits
are
there
and
then
updating
the
counter
there
to
always
keep
it
in
sync,
I'm
not
sure.
If
we
have
that
information
available,
I
think
we
don't
so
we'd
have
to
add
that,
but
I
feel
like
that's
the
one
of
the
cases
where
we
can
get
by
updating
it
back
in
ourselves
too.
If
we
need
to
yeah
that's
kind
of
it.
A
A
It
affects
users,
confidence
a
little
bit
so
yeah
small
one,
and
then
this
one,
I
think,
is
one
I'm
most
interested
in
and
it's
the
idea
of
avoiding
to
reload
the
entire
page.
When
changing
the
merge
request.
If
and
it's
it
helps
a
little
bit
with
this
first
one.
A
So
let
me
remind
you
like,
in
this
case
nick
changed
the
line
of
the
diff
based
on
remy's
feedback,
and
today
you
have
to
click
on
this
link
to
go
to
the
specific
version
where,
where
the
change
was
made
and
this
reloads
the
whole
page
right,
it
re-fetches
everything.
It's
a
refresh,
completely
refreshes
the
page,
and
this
issue
is
to
avoid
doing
that.
A
So
you
would
just
go
to
the
div
tab
and
the
diffs
update
in
place
instead
of
reloading
the
entire
page,
and
this
would
have
the
benefit
of
what
we
recently
did
with
the
tabs.
I
don't
know
if
you
any
of
you
have
noticed
that
we
keep
the
location
of
where
you
were
before.
So
if
you
go
to
the
div
tabs
to
see
sorry
to
the
changes
tab
to
see
hey,
this
is
what
nick
changed.
You
then
go
back
to
the
overview,
tab
and
you're
scroll
down
to
this
thread.
B
B
Whenever
we
want
to
switch,
you
tear
down
the
app
build
again,
the
new
state-
if
you
do
this
a
couple
of
times
with
like
memory
usage,
might
be
creeping
in
some
memory
leaks
in
there,
so
the
performance
will
suffer.
Largemrs
we've
seen
this
in
the
past,
where
tearing
down
a
large,
mr,
a
large
state.
Sorry,
a
large
mr
from
the
state
will
give
browser
a
hell
of
a
lot
of
work
so
and
then
vue
is
not
particularly
performant
at
tearing
down
components.
B
So
that
means
that
you
have
to
wait
for
everything
to
be
turned
down
and
be
updated
with
the
new
state.
So,
in
terms
of
time,
it's
usually
more
effective
to
just
reload
the
page,
because
you
get
a
blank
slate,
you
start
from
scratch
might
be
a
cop-out,
but
we
can
look
into
it
and
write
a
proof
of
concept
to
see
how
how
bad
that
would
look
like.
B
B
A
B
C
Mean
like,
but
we
tried
that
with
like
in
the
context
of
the
settings
drop
down
in
the
top
right.
We
yeah,
like
only
if
you
switch
from
like
side
by
side
to
inline,
like
we
tried
to
which
I
guess
we
don't
sort
of
just
naturally
redo
the
page,
I'm
trying
to
think
like.
I
thought
we
had
the
same
sort
of
thing
where,
like
below
the
tabs.
C
Basically
we
talked
about
reloading
just
that
section
which
is
similar
to
what
this
is
asking
like
below
the
tabs
reload
just
that
section,
as
opposed
to
like,
if
you
click
the
latest,
if
you
click
the
drop
down
thing,
then
we
reload
almost
everything,
but
the
sidebars
are
so
fast.
Like
I
don't
know,
I
wonder
like
what
the
perceived
performance
gained.
This
feels
like
perceived
performance,
game,
great
pedro.
C
A
Really
cool
here
yeah,
it's
two
things
so
that
and
also
the
fact
that
you
can
now
go
back
to
the
overview
tab
and
you
don't
lose
your
place
anymore,
so,
which
that's
why
I
was
saying
that
it's
it's
linked
to
that
issue
where
we
display
the
changes
inline,
it
would
help
a
little
bit
with
those
cases
where
you
have
to
go
to
a
different
version
of
the
diff.
A
I
thought
that
for
that
drop
down
on
the
top
right
corner
of
the
changestep,
the
preferences
dropdown
for
all
of
the
modes
except
for
white
space
changes,
we
would
just
re
change
how
yeah
things
were
drawn
in
the
by
the
browser
and
with
white
space
changes.
We
would
have
to
re-fetch
all
of
the
diffs.
A
That
was
my
understanding
and
that's
why.
I
think
that
I
thought
in
theory
that
this
could
help,
because
we're
refetching
the
diffs
but
but
yeah
anyway,
andre
you're,
saying
that
in
theory
from
what
we
know,
it
won't
be
a
more
performant
experience
for
especially
for
large,
merge
requests.
A
A
C
C
I
think
that
I
think
what
you're-
and
maybe
this
will
like
this
one,
I'm
just
gonna,
because
I
had
to
sit
here
and
play
with
it
to
understand
it
like
if
I
do
white
space
only
this
reloads
and
I
think
that's
the
ask,
whereas
if
I
change
version
here
the
whole
page
reload,
even
though
it's
incredibly
fast
like
you,
can
see
the
sidebar
loaders
and
stuff
happen
so
like
the
question
would
be,
could
for
this
version
drop
down?
D
D
A
Okay,
okay,
so
yeah
in
this
case,
it
might
make
sense
instead
of
investing
a
lot
of
time
and
effort
here
to
if
we
were
to
schedule
this
to
just
do
a
small
proof
of
concept
right.
A
B
A
A
A
A
Okay,
cool-
this
was
a
very
short
one
anyway
I'll
place.
The
links
in
the
planning
issue.
Oh
one
thing
I
wanted
to
ask:
do
you
think
that
so
this
this
was
a
very
short
partition
session?
It
wasn't
exactly
how
we
used
to
do
it
and
I
think
two
milestones
ago,
we
skipped
the
prioritization
session.
A
Do
you
think
it's
worth
doing
a
very
quick
retro
take
out
the
temperature
to
see
if,
if
everyone
feels
like
these
are
product
productive
and
we
should
keep
doing
them
or
is
it
just
a
matter
of
timing
that
we're
hitting
in
into
these
engineering
allocations,
and
so
that's
why
we
haven't
been
able
to
draw
as
much
value
from
them
recently.
B
A
D
It's
yeah.
It's
definitely
weird
timing
right
now,
so
I
think
that's
a
big
part
of
it,
so
I
think
we
should
revisit
it
once
these
once
we
have
a
little
more
once
back
and
at
least
has
a
little
more
time
to
focus
on
it.
Yeah
yeah,
I'm
not
sure,
we'll,
have
to
see
at
that
point.
We
can
decide
whether
or
not
we
want
to
keep
going,
but
I'd
like
to
at
least
keep
trying
it
a
little
bit
after
when
things
theory
are
back
to
normal
a
little
bit.
Hopefully.
C
C
We
found
what
we
could
find
and
we
actually
ended
up
prioritizing
a
bunch
of
that
work
and
then
I
think
we're
going
to
be,
as
pointed
out
in
the
issue
that
I
linked
in
slack
earlier,
we're
going
to
be
struggling
to
find
front
and
only
work
inside
of
our
group,
probably
for
a
period
of
time
and
we're
going
to
have
to
start
looking
at
some
of
the
larger
front-end
initiatives
across
gitlab.
C
Like
view
three
migrations
and
other
things
that
people
want
to
do
that
haven't
gotten
prioritized
just
because
back
end
is
going
to
be
tied
up
for
wow,
unknown.
B
So,
okay,
on
that
note,
we
are
looking
at
the
front-end
level.
We
are
looking
at
those
global.
I
am
having
a
discussion
with
the
team
right
now,
then
we'll
share
it
with
the
other
ems
and
we'll
make
a
decision,
a
joint
decision
so
that
we're
not
like
each
group
picking
a
very
random
topic
and
we're
trying
to
rally
around
the
same
ones.
B
C
B
C
Yeah,
I
don't
have
strong
opinions
about
sort
of
this
stuff
outside
of
our
group
other
than
I
wish.
We
were
able
to
work
on
things
in
our
group.
A
All
right
yeah,
I
think
what
we
can
do
is
for
the
next
milestone
when
he
gets
to
that
point.
Where
I
usually
schedule
these
sessions.
I
will
ask
in
the
planning
issue
first,
if
everyone
feels
like
it
might.