►
From YouTube: Content Editor: Toolbar UX status Feb 2022
A
Where
you
have
text
formatting
under
here-
and
here
will
be
your
paragraph
headings,
subscript
superscript
things
like
that,
underneath
this
drop
down
the
next
area
will
be
all
your
formatting,
so
bold,
italic
strikethrough
quotes
inline
code
links
and
the
lists
and
different
types
of
lists,
and
then
the
next
part
here
is
all
things
that
are
insertable,
so
links
tables,
and
this
plus
sign
is
a
button
that
would
open
up
a
menu
and
that
will
surface
all
other
things
that
you
could
insert.
So
it's
using
the
same
pattern
as
the
overflow
menu.
A
A
A
How
we
got
to
this
conclusion
is
that
we
did
a
solution,
validation
on
the
mobile
experience,
and
here
we
wanted
to
test
this
kind
of
pattern
where
we
were
looking
at
having
a
save
button
inside
the
toolbar
and
then
having
the
formatting
options
over
here
and
then
adding
new
items.
Inserting
items
as
a
separate
button
after
during
testing
people
did
understand
it.
A
So
that's
why
I
think
it's
better
to
just
keep
it
focused
so
that
we
have
a
toolbar
area
and
then
up
here
we
have
our
actions,
save
changes
and
cancel
or
whatever
it
may
be,
depending
on
the
context,
whether
in
the
wiki
or
comments
or
issue
descriptions
and
there's
a
consistency
of
where
the
actions
are.
There's
concern
that
the
toolbars
and
being
placed
right
on
top
of
a
mobile
keyboard
might
be
tricky
to
implement
and
that's
why.
A
A
The
other
thing
that
we
went
through
recently
was
how
we
landed
on
the
plus
sign.
One
idea
was
to
use
the
overflow,
and
this
is
what
we
tested
so
here
for
our
test.
We
actually
threw
in
all
the
things
that
were
insertable
formatting
options,
as
well
as
text
styles,
all
in
one
menu
and
the
feedback
from
users
where
that
things
were
hard
to
find
so
users
would
like
look
up
and
down
the
menu
not
being
able
to
find
in.
A
This
scenario
was
in
the
table
of
contents,
so
they
would
search
and
search
and
not
find
it.
The
reasons
for
that
is
there's
no
rhyme
or
logic
to
this.
This
everything
was
just
thrown
together.
That's
why
we're
going
with
an
alphabetical
list,
as
well
as
introducing
too
many
options
in
here,
so
the
formatting
options
are
already
up
here.
So
if
it's
in
the
toolbar,
we
wouldn't
really
need
to
have
it
inside
and
this
drop
down
menu
as
well
as
the
same
thing
goes
for
the
text
drop
down
over
here.
A
So
that
gets
us
to
the
stage
of
the
menu
where
we
have
formatting
insert
and
quick
actions
in
the
past.
We
did
test
other
experiences
like
a
selection,
so
if
I
select
over
here
having
the
formatting
tools
on
top
and
not
having
a
toolbar
at
all
on
the
page,
I
think
one
of
the
feedback
on
this
was
users
did
not
know
that
what
options
were
available
to
them
when
they
first
look
at
the
screen.
I
think
this
is
coming
from
past
experiences
with
gitlab,
where
there's
a
toolbar
to
kind
of
orientate
yourself.
A
I
think
this
is
something
we
could
introduce
in
the
future,
but
at
the
time
being,
I
think
we
can
stick
with
the
toolbar
and
then
experiment
with
what
it
means
for
this
interaction
to
be
successful,
and
we
also
at
the
same
time
tested
this
experience
where,
in
inside
a
new
line
you'll
be
able
to
insert
commonly
used
objects.
Here
we
have
styling
formatting
and
inserting
objects.
I
think
in
the
future.
We
would
just
go
with
inserting
images
or
inserting
objects
inside
this
interaction,
as
described
over
here.
A
How
we
present-
that
is
something
that
we
will
continue
to
iterate,
but
I
think
this
implemented
that,
as
as
a
list,
would
help
discoverability
of
many
more
items,
because
we
have
more
than
just
five
four
to
six
items.
We
have
many
items
that
could
be
inserted
so
having
this
is
more
ideal
for
better
scan
ability.