►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
C
C
A
Way,
don't
need
to
tweak
the
matrix
definition
file.
We
can
go
with
historical
Max
users
or
that's
the
guitar
clusters,
because
this
might
be
a
trickier
one
in
terms
of
packing
if
it's
actually
database
or
whatever
it
starts
so
first
and
this
step
probably
wouldn't
be
done
by
you,
but
other
somebody.
Who's
gonna
review
image,
request
to
confirm
that.
A
A
A
A
A
A
Yeah,
so
you
can
see
this
is
Italy
and
dineset
metric
clusters,
which
would
be
translated.
The
keypuff
is
built
basically
as
the
flattened
structure
of
metric
location
in
the
Json
payload.
So
this
kind
of
last
thing
is
matching
the
what
we've
seen
in
there.
So
we
type
the
Clusters
and
we
can
see
this
is
using
Auto,
active
usage
data
and
is
trying
to
call
some
methods
which
doesn't
seems
to
go
into
the
actual
database
yep.
It's
using
the
configuration.
D
Could
I
pause,
you
I,
guess
I'm
I'm,
a
little
lost
yeah
it
looks
like
this
file
is
showing
redis.
Is
the
data
source
but
I'm?
Looking
at
my
own
copy
of
of
this
yaml
file,
and
at
least
at
this
time
it
it
clearly
shows
the
data
sources
database.
So
I'm
curious
if
I'm
missing
something
if
something
changed
was
I.
Looking
at
the
wrong
file,
I.
A
Just
there's
something:
oh
all
right!
Sorry,
this
is
my
fault
at
first
I
made
an
assumption.
That's
because
you
mentioned
it
was
present
in
redis,
but
marked
Us
in
Ready's
API,
but
was
present
in
was
marked
as
a
database.
So
I
made
assumption
out
of
that
that
oh
it's
for
this
metric,
but
then
I
just
got
the
code
like
I,
followed
my
assumption.
So
what
else?
A
A
E
C
A
D
Well,
from
my
point
of
view,
rather
one
yep,
there
are
already
some
metrics
that
are
system
that
sorry
they're
defined
as
system
in
the
yaml
file,
but
let's
say
they're
in
the
redis
payload
I,
don't
I
didn't
want
to
drop
them.
So,
okay,
exactly
anything
that's
non-database
is
is
kept.
So
if
we
went
with
this
logic,
where
we
adjusted
it
from
database
to
system,
it
would
be
okay
for
us.
That's.
A
C
E
B
A
A
I
think
this
is
a
really
good
opportunity
to
for
the
group
that
helped
her
owns
the
web
ID
to
apply
the
permit
templates
because,
when
I'm
using
it
for
the
terminal,
I
have
the
comic
template
that
show
me
the
limits
and
requirements.
So
I
I
don't
over
step
them,
but
here
it
can
be
a
little
bit
harder
to
notice.
But
let's
keep
it
simple
so.
A
B
C
C
Great
one,
definitely
thanks
people
I
more
than
clear
for
us,
I
mean
now.
We
know
the
process
actually
real
time
to
be
very
careful
that
my
question
as
a
follow-up
on
this
is:
can
we
screw
up
something
seriously
because
I
don't
know
who
is
still
using
this
file
in
case
we
did
some
type
of
like
database
or
something.
B
A
E
B
E
The
yeah
I'm
actually
happy
to
do
it.
I
can
do
it
right
now.
This
morning,
I
have
a
pretty
good
intuition,
for
which
ones
should
what
the
late,
what
the
data
sources
should
be
and
if
not
I'm
sure
products
intelligence
will
catch
it
so
I'm
happy
to
just
do
it
Nikolai
if
you
could
just
drop
the
link
to
that
Mr
in
the
chat
and
I'll
just
go
ahead,
and
do
that
and
I'll
of
course
tag
everyone
on
the
Mr.
E
C
Exactly
and
also
two
cents
from
my
side,
it
would
be
also
great
to
putbook
regarding
the
process
and
connect
to
this
Mr
as
a
temp
template
for
us.
We
can
reuse
it
later
on
like
if
something
happened,
and
no
one
is
here:
I
I,
let's
say
I
catch
that
problematic
I
need
to
change
it.
It
will
be
good
to
recall
so
this
video
session
recorded
session,
plus
that
Mr
in
handbook
with
two
centers
will
be
perfect.
I
can
take
it
with
me.
Justin
you
can
take
it
miles,
can
take
it.
A
Rules,
it
works.
So
if
you
want
to
just
Streamlight
work,
you
can
assign
one
you
when
you
update
all
the
Matrix
files,
you
can
assign
the
email
request
to
me
for
the
review
and
you
can
just
move
it
along,
but
I
cannot
contribute
to
this
no
request
copies
because
it
will
be
blocks
for
me
either
way
sounds.