►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Does
anyone
have
any
worries
or
concerns
about
performing
these
one?
One
thing
that
comes
to
mind
is
that
some
competitors
put
some
capabilities
behind.
A
A
B
I
don't
I
like
the
one
I've
brought
it
up
with
you
before.
The
one
thing
that
I
find
challenging
is
our
competitor
there's,
no
other
real
value
stream
management
platform
like
like
gitlab,
typically
value
stream
management,
is,
is
done
by
integrating
a
bunch
of
different
tools
together.
So
because
it's
it's
almost
comparing
apples
and
oranges
a
little
bit
of
the
time,
but
I'm
sure
we
can.
We
can
figure
out
aspects
of
it
that
are
comparable
at
least
excel
yeah.
C
So
I
think
we
talked
about
some
workarounds
or
just
trying
to
like
connect
like
the
demo
site
or
something
or
other
projects
that
are
in
gitlab,
but
we'll
just
see
you
know
you
won't
know
until
you
try
and
get
in
there
and
look
at
a
competitor
tool
and
you're.
Oh
yeah,
I
had
a
wall
in
this
product
because
I
had
to
integrate
with
this
part
in
gitlab,
and
I
was
not
about
to
create
100,
mrs
to
make
metrics
populate
here.
A
D
D
They
have
a
slack
group,
the
particular
person
I
had
spoken
with.
I
have
forgotten
at
this
point
in
time.
If
you
just
go
to
hashtag
demo
hyphen
systems
I'll
copy
the
link-
perhaps
maybe
I
don't
know
how
copy
link
okay,
jeff
martin,
I
think,
was
the
person
I
spoke
to
speaking
with,
but
also.
C
Yeah,
so
we've
been
hearing
a
lot
of
great
excitement
from
our
customers
that
are
evaluating
ultimate
as
an
option
for
themselves.
Now
that
we've
released
pipeline
compliance,
but
that's
now
making
me
a
a
little
more
anxious
to
get
out
and
like
resolve
all
the
smaller
usability
problems
that
occur
around
the
user
journey
and
I'll
show
I'll
share
my
screen
to
help
illustrate
where
one
of
these
kind
of
shows
up.
C
The
basic
premise
of
pipeline
compliance
is,
you
can
require
a
job
to
run
or
a
series
of
jobs
to
run
in
projects
pipelines.
So
at
each
stage
you
can
say
you
have
to
run
this
job
every
time
you
don't
get
a
choice
to
edit
it.
It's
something
that
we
are
saying
from
the
organization
perspective
is
mandatory.
C
The
way
that
that
appears
in
a
project
is
you
configure
a
compliance
framework
that
says:
hey,
here's
the
configuration
file
for
that
pipeline
compliance
and
then
for
each
project
that
has
to
have
that
enforced.
You
apply
a
compliance
that
compliance
framework
to
it.
So,
in
this
example,
marcel,
is
bringing
up
the
fact
that
the
compliance
framework
setting
just
lives
in
like
the
general
area
and
taking
up
some
valuable
real
estate
of
that
section.
So
we
have
a
proposal
to
relocate
that
somewhere
else,
probably
just
for
a
first
release
of
changing
it
as
its
own
section.
C
But
I'd
really
like
to
go
think
long
term
where
we
would
like
to
set
up
more
of
the
compliance
settings
being
dedicated
under
security
and
compliance.
Secure
has
already
built
a
number
of
configuration
settings
specifically
in
this
area
and
what
I
would
love
to
present
to
users
is
like
before
they
apply
these
frameworks
to
their
project.
I
want
to
give
them
a
preview
of
what
could
impact
them
so
pipeline.
Compliance
is
currently
the
only
thing
now,
but
we're
considering
being
able
to
enforce
settings
through
compliance
frameworks.
C
That
way,
you
know
as
you're
applying
this
setting.
You
don't
have
to
memorize
what
all
those
impacts
might
be
and
be
able
to
pick
the
right
thing.
So
my
question
for
you
all
is:
how
would
you
consider
relaying
to
a
user
that
applying
this
framework
is
going
to
potentially
impact
your
settings?
We
may
or
may
not
know
we
might
may
or
may
not
be
able
to
determine
if
it's
going
to
or
not
on,
like
the
first
release.
D
C
Right
so
in
my
example,
here
I
was
trying
to
relay
that.
If
you
apply
the
soc2
framework
you're
going
to
have
pipeline
compliance,
enabled
you're
going
to
have
some
settings
enforcement
enabled
that
might
look
different.
If
you
apply
the
socks
framework
or
something
that
you've
created,
which
may
not
have
any
requirements
at
all,
it
might
just
be
a
label
for
all.
D
Framework
might
impact
the
configuration
of
a
project
like
okay
and
because
I
didn't
understand
that
pipeline
compliance
and
settings
enforcements
were
the
current
configuration.
So
perhaps
there
might
be
some
way
to
connect
those
two
logical
things.
That's
kind
of
what
I
was
thinking:
mm-hmm,
okay,.
B
I
agree
with
dan
and
like
in
the
settings.
This
is
under
compliance
settings
and
stuff.
I'm
just
wondering
whether
there's
more
of
a
like
a
brief
blurb
that
you
can
have,
which
gives
a
similar
explanation
to
what
you
gave
us,
the
context
that
you
gave
us
as
to
like
this
is
what
a
compliance
framework
does,
and
this
is
why
it's
important
and
then
that
should
set
up
the
context
for
the
alert
saying
this.
This
could
impact
settings
in
one
way
or
another
that
compliance
enforcement
blurb.
B
Underneath
what
you
have
right
now
like
says
it
adds
compliance
stuff
next
to
the
project
name
or
whatever,
but
it
doesn't
really
sort
of
tell
you
like
specifically
how
that
impacts
the
way
that
the
project
works.
If
you,
if
you
get
my
meaning,
it
sort
of,
tells
you
what
doesn't
really
tell
you
how
or
why.
B
A
Sense,
that's
really
good
feedback.
Do
you
want
comments
on
the
figma
austin?
Are
you
taking
notes
on
this.
C
I
was
taking
it
in
verbally,
so
I
hadn't
even
taken
any
notes
yet,
but
I
see
nick
is
writing
down
some
of
his
thoughts
there
too
yeah.
I
welcome
any
comments
you
wanna
drop
in
figma.
C
I
will
preface
it
by
saying
that
this
page
doesn't
necessarily
exist
today.
Secure
was
implementing
these
or
working
towards
implementing
these
other
tabs.
C
So
we
were
talking
about
hey,
let's
consider
incorporating
compliance
as
another
one
of
those
tabs
and
I
was
kind
of
working
within
the
design
of
how
they
had
envisioned
like
settings
area
to
you
know
kind
of
show
and
behave
so
I
mean
I
guess
it
could
have
been
reduced
to
a
much
more
lower.
Fidelity
of
I
want
to
show
frameworks
and
like
the
preview
to
changes
and
then
obviously
a
description
would
be
more
useful
for
helping
lead.
C
That
information,
I
think
the
tricky
part
is
compliance
frameworks,
might
not
have
any
impact
at
all
like
if
they
don't.
If
they
don't
do
any
settings
enforcement
or
they
don't
do
any
compliance
pipeline
work,
then
they're
they
are
just
like
a
ui
badge
or
a
label,
so
it's
kind
of
it
all
depends
on
how
they
were
configured.
B
C
Question,
I
don't
have
an
answer
to
that,
because
I
didn't
design
the
screen
initially,
but
I
did
share
that
with
michael
lee
too
I'll
show
you
where
is
where
this
is
all
coming
from.
C
So
secure
was
working
on
a
like
a
bigger
overhaul
of
their
settings
and
so
like
this
is
an
example
of
where
that
was
showing
up,
and
I
know
michael
lee
was
asking
about
it
too,
so
I
tried
to
share
with
him
he's
asking:
why
are
we
sometimes
using
a
box
like
you'll,
find
a
box
sometimes
in
settings
like
for
auto
devops?
I
know
that's
one
that
has
it
sometimes
there's
just
like
a
gray
box
around
the
settings.
D
C
Initially
built
these
designs,
I
am
not
particularly
tied
to
any
solution
at
this
point
for
how
we
display
the
settings
individually,
but
just
know
that
I
don't
know
why.
It's
there.
B
C
B
No
problem,
I
think
we
could
probably
use
a
gestalt
principle
of
proximity
and
grouping
to
differentiate
them
rather
than
having
all
those
boxes
and
stuff.
But
that's
a
personal
opinion.
One.
C
B
Thing
is
another
thing
that
could
probably
help
out
here
is
also
having
a
link
to
the
the
docu
documentation
for.
C
Yeah,
that's
a
good
point.
The
other
way
that
this
the
way
that
these
frameworks
can
be
applied
is
you
have
to
be
a
group
owner
to
set
them
up
at
the
group
level,
and
you
only
the
only
people
that
can
apply
these
at
the
project.
Level
are
also
group
owners,
so
in
theory
for
a
lot
of
organizations
that
will
be
the
same
person,
but
it
is
possible
that
someone
could
be
the
group
owner
that
configures
them
and
then
gives
the
task
to
a
thousand
project
managers
that
also
hold
that
group
owner
role.
C
C
C
C
Sure
alexis,
so
if
you
are
applying
a
compliance
framework
to
your
project
today,
all
you're
seeing
is
a
list
of
them,
so
you
might
pick
one
and
apply
it
and
not
realize
that
it's
going
to
impact
your
project
settings
so
one
way
that
it
can
definitely
show
up
today
is
you
can
have
these
enforced
jobs
show
up
in
your
pipeline,
but
you
wouldn't
know
that
it
just
as
you
pick
a
label
you
hit
save
or
you
pick
a
framework.
You
hit
save
changes
and
now,
all
of
a
sudden,
this
thing
has
appeared.
E
C
Right
like
today,
it's
just
a
drop-down
list
of
all
of
the
compliance
frameworks
that
a
group's
created
and
so
from
there.
The
only
context
you're
given
is
the
name
of
the
framework
and
I'm
trying
to
at
least
show
hey.
This
is
going
to
impact
your
pipeline
compliance
hey.
This
might
impact
your
inherited
settings.
C
In
this
case,
so
currently,
what's
already
been,
this
is
kind
of
a
mixture
of
what's
been
released
and
what
we're
kind
of
exploring
pipeline
compliance
has
been
released.
So
if
you
have
specified
for
your
framework
that
you
want
pipeline
compliance,
then
yes,
it
will
override
your
project's
jobs
if
there's
conflict
so
like.
If
you
have
a
job
at
your
project
level,
that's
not
as
restrictive
as
the
one.
That's
in
the
compliance
pipeline
pipeline
compliance
takes
precedence.
E
C
C
C
I'll
pass
it
on
to
mike
since
holly
says
more
just
fyi,.
A
A
I'm
just
reading
it
right
now,
no
okay!
I
was
watching
for
a
facial
expression.
I
was
like
man.
This
guy's
got
a
poker
face.
You
don't,
though,
you're
very
expensive
yeah.
A
This
is
my
last
design
review
my
last
day
at
get
lab
is
this
friday,
and
so,
rather
than
identify
a
facilitator
for
this,
I
just
remind
you
all
to
use
the
agenda
and
hold
each
other
accountable
to
making
sure
that
if
there's
something
in
the
agenda
that
that
item
is
addressed-
and
it's
addressed
before
the
the
meeting
ends,
obviously
that
everybody
gets
equal
time
and
to
kind
of
monitor
the
monologging.
A
So
I'm
not
accusing
anyone
in
particular
right
now
doing
this
is
a
general
problem
and
I
have
this
problem
and
I'm
doing
it
now
so
when
you,
when
you're
speaking,
try
to
so
here's
a
trick.
I
do
I
I
turned
on
the
seconds
counter
in
the
top
right
of
my
mac
os
clock
and
when
I'm
mindful
of
it
I'll
actually
glance
and
try
to
be
like.
A
Have
I
been
talking
for
more
than
60
seconds
and
if
I
have
I'll
definitely
like
pause
and
definitely
ask
if,
if
everyone's
still
following
along-
and
this
is
still
you
know
beneficial
for
folks,
so
just
be
mindful
of
that,
and
I
don't.
I
don't
think
we
need
a
particular
facilitator,
just
hold
each
other
accountable
to
being
inclusive,
and
the
video
should
continue
to
automatically
upload
to
google
drive.
A
So
you
can
just
you
know,
maybe
once
a
week
someone
says
I'll
I'll
I'll
upload
it
to
unfiltered
or
something
to
that
effect.
How
does
that
sound?
Or
do
you
prefer
that
someone
is
a
dri.
A
D
A
Yeah,
don't
forget
to
upload.
There
is
a
link
to
the
playlist,
also
at
the
top
of
the
agenda.