►
From YouTube: Manage compliance framework solution validation overview
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
So
just
refresh
your
meant,
the
design
with
it
is
like
in
the
compliance
Center,
we
add
the
tab
because
the
Frameworks
and
we
list
out
the
compliant
framework
with
the
associated
information.
The
user
can
create
a
new
one
and
edit
a
new
one.
So
the
research
is
to
validate
are
those
features
framework
how
they
operate
from
work,
match
users
needs
and
can
they
easily
create
or
update
new
framework
and
also
update
the
policy
related
with
framework?
A
So
let's
go
to
the
details,
the
dovetail
like
projects
already
linked
it
and
you
can
directly
go
to
the
insights
and
with
the
insights
they're
like
the
tax.
If
you
click
on
the
tags,
you
will
see
the
videos
of
the
user's
clips
that
I
made.
So
let's
just
go
over
the
informatic
one,
so
the
overall
informatic
one
is
user.
Think
the
compliant
framework
really
matched
their
requirement.
A
How
I
work
with
it
and
their
meaning
definition
of
framework,
similar
to
what
we
did
and
the
user
generally
think,
like
the
create
an
editing
framework,
is
easy
and
one
user
I
think
if
you
see
think
it's
either
easy
or
difficult,
like.
A
The
main
reason
for
this
is
that
a
user
didn't
really
directly
think
about
create
a
new
framework
and
she
were
thinking
about
directly
linking
a
project
and
also
linking
the
policies
directly
with
the
product,
so
the
compliant
framework
is
not
a
necessary
step,
so
this
is
actionable
actually
for
the
future
exploration
that
I
created
I.
Think
that's
like
a
very
useful
Insight
because
from
the
research
we
need
to
explain
a
lot
about
the
situation,
because
the
projects
are
fake
and
the
scenario
is
not
really
real.
A
So
we
need
a
lot
of
preparation
for
them
to
get
used
to
it
and
then
guide
them
to
Think
Through,
how
they
do
it
and
for
some
user,
like
they
might
not
directly
thinking
about
group
framework
for
the
product
and
I,
think
that's
very
reasonable,
and
we
can
explore
future
that
we
want
to
make
the
framework
optional
optional
option
or
required
option
and
like
should
we
encourage
them
or
like
have
a
way
to
get
them
to
use
it
as
a
necessary
step.
So
that's
the
actionable
Insight.
A
We
can
explore
future
so
in
general,
let's
to
say
for
the
user,
when
they
read
the
documentation
familiar
with
the
the
product
does
a
pre-assumption
that
we
did
with
the
test
that
the
create
framework
or
updates
anything
inside
is
quite
easy.
A
Another
useful
information
is
like
most
of
user,
don't
have
a
lot
of
framework
in
their
real
life
scenario
and
they
don't
some
of
them,
don't
updates
very
often
some
of
them
upgraded
very
often,
so
you
have
a
monthly,
basically
quarterly
I
think
it
really
depends
on
their
project,
their
skill
of
company
and
their
requirements.
A
So
we
cannot
make
a
general
assumption
about
the
frequency
when
we
do
lack
of
future
designs
and
usually
the
policy
information
is
useful
for
the
user
now
but
like
they
also
have
the
Assumption,
like
the
user
directly
mentioned
that
I,
probably
the
one
who
created
policy
so
I
know
what
it
is.
So
the
information
are
enough
and
I
have
a
separate
issue
like
for
actionable
for
the
future,
how
to
onboarding
new
users.
A
A
You
can
just
like
go
here
and
click
on
the
issue
and
to
see
what
it's
I
will
quickly
go
to
the
brave
structure
of
them,
some
of
them
already
mentioned
before,
but
now,
let's
see
the
design
update
so
for
the
first
one
and
I
will
mention
that
the
default
when
you
open
compliance
Center,
is
still
standard
adherence
because
mostly
users
want
to
see
the
failures,
either
violation
or
standard
adherence.
A
So
I
would
assume
that
if
you
have
violations
that
you
probably
have
more
failings
and
it's
better
to
solve
the
settings
than
the
violations,
so
that's
assumptions
for
now,
because
if
you
have
settings
wrong
you,
you
are
not
necessary
to
have
violations.
But
if
you
have
violation
that
means
you
must
have
something
wrong
with
the
settings.
So
the
adherence
is
like,
if
you
fix
that,
probably
you
will
fix
the
both
the
violations
automatically.
A
So
that's
why
the
other
Heroes
will
be
the
like
default
tab
when
you
open
the
compliance
Center
and
for
the
list
itself
user
understand
the
default.
Everyone
understands
that
there
is
only
one
default
and
with
the
information
we
provide,
they
know
what
is
default
and
it's
just
not
very
obvious.
So
I
changed
the
design.
That's
like
either
line
here,
make
it
The,
Bold
and
icon
to
make
the
default
a
little
bit
more
like
a
different
from
the
rest
of
them.
A
I
can
probably
create
a
separate
issue
to
quickly
update
it,
instead
of
like
this
part
of
the
main
issue
for
this
product,
because
we
already
have
default
and
another
update
is
like
when
you
click
on
here,
they
have
a
drawer
that
gives
more
information.
A
lot
of
users
like
I,
want
to
have
more
information
about
the
policy
about
this,
and
they
want
to
click
on
those
things.
So
I
think
on
the
list
of
you
to
click
on
them
is
not
easy.
A
So
if
I
have
a
drawer
and
all
of
them
are
links,
user
can
click
them
go
to
a
different
Tab
and
to
open
the
policy
to
open
the
project.
So
they
know
what
it
is
is
better
than
make
everything
like
a
click
ball
on
the
list.
It's
quite
annoying,
so
I
did
the
drawer
and
also
add
the
edit
button
here
and
also
the
default
explanation,
and
those
are
just
some
basic
information
and
for
create
after
user
create
a
new
framework.
A
Add
a
feedback
like
says:
a
new
framework
has
been
created
successfully
and
the
project
like
Associated
project
will
be
scanned
better
selected.
A
serum
check
and
sell
select.
The
policy
will
take
effect
immediately.
So
if
your
user
don't
have
a
deherence
or
check
this
copy
will
change.
If
the
user
won't
have
a
policy
selected,
we
don't
show
this
copy.
So
I
will
add
those
details
later
and
foreign.
A
User
update
a
policy
inside
the
framework
when
they
go
back
to
this
page.
They
probably
like
I,
need
to
update
the
policy
and
tell
them
that
hey
this
policy
has
been
updated
successfully.
A
And
some
other
changes,
some
small
things
and
I
think
one
of
them
is
the
copy.
So
one
user
was
not
clear
with
the
copy
like
how
many
links
and
like
before,
we
said
how
many
available
I
changed
it
to
total
policy.
So
you
don't
know
like
total
policies.
How
many
links
and
available
is
a
little
bit
ambiguous
for
one
user,
so
I
think
this
way
is
more
clear.
We
can
also
discuss
the
copy
further
if
you
have
other
like
ideas
and
I.
A
Think
for
this
page
there
is
no
further
update,
but
I
did
change.
This
was
a
eclipse
and
the
edit
button
was
in
the
drawer,
but
then
it
was
not
very
obvious.
A
lot
of
people
are
not
familiar
with
gilab,
so
they
didn't
see
this
edit
button
easily
in
the
drawer,
so
they
were
more
expecting
like
if
they
need
added
to
the
can
add
it
directly
here
so
I
make
it
more
clear
instead
of
go
to
the
drawer,
but
the
same
at
the
least
I
think
with
it's
good
that
we
train
user.
A
A
I
think
here
for
editing
policy.
There's
nothing
changed,
so
the
only
issue
is
like
when
user
go
to
this
added
policy.
If
it's
in
a
security
project,
they
have
difficult
to
navigate
back
I
already
create
a
new
issue
to
improve
that
I.
Think
that's
what
has
been
changed
updated
for
the
current
design.
A
So
let's
go
back
to
the
filtering
in
size,
so
for
the
filtering
size
and
for
a
user
think
about
like
this
is
what
I've
already
mentioned.
Some
users
think
that
they
don't
want
to
create
a
framework
and
then
link
project
there
and
the
link
policy
there.
There
are
main
ideas:
okay,
I
want
to
group
those
projects.
A
Maybe
not
even
group
product
I
directly
want
to
link
the
project
to
the
framework
and
directly
link
the
product
to
the
policy
to
the
hearings
report,
those
things
we
have
discussed
before.
So
we
want
to
educate
user
to
use
compliance
framework
and
we
believe
that
after
they
get
used
to,
it
is
easy,
I
think
that's
one
approach.
A
Another
approach
is
like
we
just
skip
this
as
optional
thing,
so
I
create
a
new
issue
for
this
to
explore
what
are
the
best
way
for
the
user
if
compliance
framework
is
really
necessary,
I
think
it's
not
really
necessary.
We
can
encourage
user,
but
limiting
users,
probably
not
the
best
way.
I
can
further
discuss
in
the
issue,
and
you
want
to
test
the
framework
before
using
it.
Actually
I
think
we
got
similar
feedback
for
the
policy,
so
if
user
want
to
create
policies,
they
want
to
test
it.
A
A
And
also
these
are
also
quickly
mentioned,
like
with
the
test.
We
give
a
scenario,
but
the
scenario
is
like
you'd
already
created
the
policy
you're
already
created
the
projects
and
understands
the
group
products,
a
project
kind
of
structure
of
gilab,
so
for
a
new
user.
How
to
use
those
things
like
complying
framework
is
basically
managing
everything.
A
So
if
you
start
with
complying
framework,
I
have
zero
knowledge
of
the
projects
of
key
lab
our
policy,
how
we
can
get
users
through
the
thing,
so
that's
really
onboarding
for
the
new
user,
although
like
need
to
improve
the
experiments
experience
for
that,
so
for
some
user
they
were
more
interested
into
the
violation
and
actionable
thing
for
the
violation
what
they
can
do,
so
they
give
some
suggestions.
A
So
there
are
also
I,
create
a
new
issue
for
the
violations
and
for
the
hearings
report
like
how
we
can
improve
it
for
the
user
to
use
those
two
tabs.
So
it's
not
directly
related
with
this,
but
I
already
create
issues
so
for
us
to
help
use
a
few
in
the
future
with
other
areas,
and
this
is
also
not
directly
with
the
framework,
but
also
when
you
think
about
the
compliance
framework
Center.
So
the
first
thing
came
to
their
idea
is
like
oh
I
want
to
know
the
status
of
my
project.
A
I
want
to
know
like
how
many
failures
I
want
to
know
like
the
overall
kind
of
understanding
of
the
healthy
figures,
of
something
that
I'm
watching
so
I
think
this
is
I
also
heard
from
other
research.
This
is
repeated
thing.
I
think
it's
good
that
way
in
the
future.
Look
into
this.
That's
probably
like
well
enrich
our
like
now
competitive,
like
the
trends
of
the
compliance
related
feature
and
I.
A
Think
one
user
mentioned
that
he
wants
like
more
compliance
for
more
products,
and
we
talk
about
this
before
that
technically
there's
difficulty,
but
we
can
also
solve
it
differently.
So
we
need
to
like
look
into
that
about
the
user
need
and
stuff
I
do
think
there
is
a
potential
exploration
there
and
just
the
prioritization,
and
we
need
to
talk
about
that
and
you
learn.
A
This
is
also
related
with
the
policy,
so
user
want
to
have
control
like
who
can
edit
what
related
with
compliant
framework
and
also
when
you
only
when
you
start
mention
it
is
not
the
target
of
This
research,
but
if
you
don't
mention
it
I
think
it's
worse
to
create
the
issue
and
develop
further,
and
this
is
also
repeated
topic
like
with
user
control.
So
we
can
either
do
it
through
a
policy
or
we
can
do
it
with
the
generosity.
So
that's
something
we
can
explore
in
the
future.
A
So
I
will
upload
the
design
to
the
design
issue
and
there's
a
more
details
and
also
some
edge
cases,
and
here
are
the
all
the
issue
created
and
all
the
information
related
I
will
also
add
a
summary
to
the
description
as
well.
Thank
you.
So
much
if
I
have
any
questions,
let
me
know.