►
From YouTube: Protect:Container Security group discussion 2022-08-16
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Welcome
to
our
weekly
group
meeting
for
container
security
alexander
looks
like
you've
got
a
few
things
you
wanted
to
talk
us
through
today.
B
Yeah
I
was
recently
working
on
the
follow-up
for
the
cluster
image
scanning.
The
operation,
operational
vulnerabilities
tab
and
the
tasks
in
there
were
just
prime
were
like
roughly
laid
out
as
in
like
create
the
cluster
filter
for
the
operational
vulnerability
report
and
then
create
the
image
filter
for
the
operational
vulnerability
report
and
put
it
everywhere.
So
I
was
cleaning
up
now
that
I
had
created
the
cluster
filter
and
the
image
filter.
B
I
was
looking
at
putting
it
places
and
there
was
a
few
few
issues
that
I
came
up
against,
and
so
I
created
a
bunch
of
new
issues
and
I
made
comments
everywhere
and
I
just
wanted
to
summarize
them
here.
In
one
place,
the
first
one
is
putting
the
image
filter
on
the
agent
level
formability
report
I
needed
a
back
end,
graphql
query
for
retrieving
all
the
images
for
an
agent
and
machie
graciously
already
created
that
mr
and
that
is
up
in
review.
So
thank
you
so
much
for
that.
B
The
another
issue
I
came
up
against
is,
I
thought
the
when
I
originally
was
creating
this.
I
sort
of
thought
the
vulnerability
summary
counts.
We
got.
We
got
free
with
just
creating
filters,
but
that
is
not
the
case.
There's
a
separate
query
for
that.
That
needs
to
be
modified
at
the
project
level,
and
so
I
believe
mattie
also
has
respond
to
this.
B
But
I
create
an
issue
for
that
and
it
looks
like
there's
gonna
so
that
now
exists,
and
then
I
created
new
issues
for
putting
the
cluster
and
image
filters
on
the
group
and
security
center
levels,
and
it
sounds
like
there's
some
concern
about
back
end
performance
with
that
and,
as
you
imagine,
getting
all
the
images
for
the
instance
or
all
the
clusters,
for
the
instance
might
not
be
very
performant,
and
so
there
needs
to
be
a
spike
involved
with
that.
B
A
Yeah
sure
so
priority
wise,
you
know
our
top
priority
right
now
is
still
getting
cluster
image
scanning
ready
for
general
availability,
and
this
doesn't
necessarily
have
to
be
in
for
general
availability.
So
this
would
be
a
lower
priority
than
that,
but
I
would
love
to
kind
of
wrap
up
this
body
of
cluster
image
scanning
work.
I
think
we've
been
at
it
for
over
a
year
now,
at
this
point,
and
so
it'd
be
really
nice
to
kind
of
wrap
that
up
and
and
move
on,
so
it
basically
falls.
A
B
B
Number
one
only
because
it
was
thought
that
there
was
no
more
back
end
work
for
this,
and
that
was
my
mistake.
There
is
got
it.
A
A
B
All
right
cool
is
there
any
other
questions,
comments
or
concerns
for
this
or
anything
else.
A
I
don't
have
anything
else,
yeah
great
work,
everybody
glad
to
see
you
move
forward.