►
From YouTube: Dev Section Group Conversation (Public Livestream)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Yeah
thanks
someone
asked
on
Twitter.
Why
merge
requests
reviews
our
page
feature
say:
make
the
point
that
they're,
mostly
used
for
by
individual
contributors
and
first
confused,
merge,
request
approvals,
which
I
think
is:
there's
definitely
something
your
manager
once
more
sign-off.
But
a
review
could
be
something
you
you
are
sending
to
appear
more
than
your
manager.
Who
does
the
code
review?
You
don't
want
to
spend
them
sending
to
your
managers?
Well,
if
your
managers
developer
it's
kind
of
on
the
on
the
cross,
there
I
wonder
what
what
the
thinking
is.
There
yeah
I.
A
Think
I
think
this
is
a
good
candidate
for
looking
at
you
know,
being
an
Icee
I.
Think
in
general,
we've
defaulted
to
anything.
That
is
a
review
or
anything
that
would
be
an
approval,
would
be
a
higher
tier,
but
I
think
you
could
Road
I
and
I
think
that
this
tweet,
which
I
saw
last
night
is,
is
also
brings
up
a
good
point,
which
is
you
can
review
your
own
work
too?
It
doesn't
just
have
to
be
sent
to
appear
or
a
manager
like
what
you
were
saying,
but
you
could.
A
You
can
also
review
your
own
work
and
this
is
pretty
common
when
you're
drafting
code,
it's
common
when
you're
drafting
pros
or
any
other
sort
of
you
know
written
essays
literature.
Anything
we've
done
in
school,
you
right
at
the
first
draft,
you
come
back
and
you
look
at
it
with
fresh
eyes
and
you
see
a
whole
bunch
of
different
things
that
you
didn't
catch
the
first
time
so
I
think
that's.
This
is
a
great
one
to
to
consider
moving
down,
and
you
know
James
Ramsey
and
I
spoke
yesterday
about
this.
B
B
B
Don't
it's
great
yeah,
maybe
if
you
respond
directly
I'm
out
of
the
loop
that'd
be
great
and
we
don't
have
to
promise
anything
to
say:
hey
we're
gonna
think
about
this,
but
isn't
this
date
feel
free
to
ping
me
for
right,
well,
plan
on
that
I'll
just
respond
directly!
Then
you
don't
worry
about
anymore
cool
hey,
so
we
released
get
la
posted
code
sandbox!
That's
awesome!
I
asked
for
a
demo,
but
there's
a
YouTube
video,
so
I
can
self-serve
for
that
I
wonder
like.
B
C
So
yeah
the
video
shows
it
for
hosting
which
basically
the
change
was
when
you,
if
you
watch
the
network
traffic
in
a
def
console,
it
would
show
the
cost
of
code
sandbox.
It
now
shows
I'm
coming
off
of
our
CDN.
Does
it
work
for
everything?
So,
even
when
the
feature
was
hosted
by
code
sandbox
and
the
feature
was
toggled
on,
forget
lab
comm
and
it
worked
for
public
or
private
projects,
I'd
be
like
that
problem,
the
difference
being
that
if
it
was
a
public
project,
we
showed
a
code
sandbox
badge
down
on
the
bottom
right.
C
If
it
was
a
private
project,
we
didn't
show
the
quotes
on
fox
patch,
and
we
didn't
you
couldn't
open
the
project
in
code
sandbox
cause
it
was
a
private
project
for
self
managed.
That
would
have
been
the
case
whether
get
lab
comm
was
hosting
it
or
not.
They
could
have
turned
it
on
and
they
could
have
talked
to
code
sandbox
if
they
wanted
to
send
their
self
manage
assets
off.
C
The
difference
now
is
that
we've
made
a
higher
level
of
trust
for
our
self-managed
customers
that,
if
they
didn't
trust,
put
some
BOTS
version
posted
versions
for
whatever
reason,
because
it
who
coats
and
boxes
they
can
trust
that
the
version
of
the
package
that
we're
hosting
is
at
least
something
that
get
lab
is
comfortable
hosting
and
in
providing
those
customers.
The
next
steps
there
we're
gonna
enable
a
feel
to
give
a
way
to
configure
where
those
assets
are
hosted,
so
that
self
manage
instances
can
host
it's
themselves.
C
We
are
not
going
to
toggle
it
on
by
default,
because
we
don't
have
a
way
to
automate
the
install.
That's
someone
for
reasons
that,
like
pages,
can't
be
automated
out
of
the
box.
This
requires
hosting
on
a
separate
domain
from
your
get
live
instance
for
security
reasons,
and
so
we
can't
do
that
as
part
of
omnibus.
C
It's
not
something
that
we're.
We
think
a
lot
of
people
need
us
to
do,
but
we
think
if
we
can
provide
the
instructions
how
to
do
that
all
right
step.
The
video
that
I
window
so
shows
that
I
hosted
the
assets
on
pages
and
then
like
to
my
pages
domain
on
galehead,
common
and
link
to
my
GDK
to
that
to
serve
those
coats
and
box
assets.
C
B
C
That
on
by
default,
there's
a
concern
for
similar
reasons
of
like
security
or
for,
like
some
self
manage
instances
with
our
security
standards
that
have
to
talk
to
live.com
for
those
rules
that
self
manage
instances,
don't
necessarily
want
external
call-outs
that
they're
not
controlling
to
other
servers,
so
out
of
the
box,
the
allowed
back
home
doesn't
make
any
external
calls.
This
would
be
one
of
those
things
that
now
Caleb
comm
is
talking
the.
B
C
If
you
installed
pages,
you
could
fork,
or
we
could
make
a
template
that
could
host
these
assets
for
you.
If
you
want
it,
we
could
do
something
to
make
it
easy,
but
we
wouldn't
necessarily
default
that
on
or
we
could
potentially
install
that
automatically.
If
you
install
pages,
maybe
with
enough
notice
but
I,
think.
B
About
all
yeah
and
it's
an
instance
wide
setting
I
can
see
some
customers
being
concerned.
If
individual
users
can
turn
this
on,
the
problem
is
like:
did
admin
see
whether
they've
turned
it
on?
Do
you
like
get
a
red
thing
in
your
admin
overview,
if
you
haven't
turned
it
on
to
show
your
instructions
and
stuff
if.
C
E
E
F
Yeah
so
I'll
take
a
little
bit
and
I
know
Gabe's
on
here.
He
has
a
lot
of
information
as
well.
They're,
like
the
main
success
metric,
is
to
get
started
right,
so
they
get
the
MVC
out
there,
so
we're
gonna
actually
start
getting
usage
on
it
and
then
open
up
conversations
with
users
to
see
what
needs
to
move
forward
with
additional
iterations.
The
success
metrics
were
specifically
working
to
track
within
you
know.
F
Actually,
through
each
tracking
is
number
of
times
him
we
refused
and
the
count
of
in
the
number
of
issues
that
get
imported
and
those
are
the
first
two
metrics
for
a
track
just
to
gauge
a
first
usage.
I
mean
I,
also
linked
to
the
MVC
epic.
If
you're
curious
about
everything
that's
going
on
in
that
conversation,
which
is
pretty
deep
in
you
know
what
the
MVC
is
actually.
H
Yeah
and
I'll
just
add
one
more
thing
to
that:
I
think
it's
it's
important
to
note
that,
like
right
now,
there's
some
gaps
between
us
and
some
of
our
main
competitors,
specifically
JIRA,
and
so
by
building
an
importer
first
and
then
maintaining
that
importer.
As
we
add
new
capabilities
product
we'll
be
able
to
better
measure
that
inflection
point
of
what
we're
starting
to
make
a
dent
in
capturing
market
share
from
JIRA
and
hopefully
in
the
future.
H
We'll
also
have
some
import
from
other
large
competitors,
but
you
know,
like
I,
think
there
are
people
who
are
asking
for
it
now
with
our
current
capabilities
and
get
lab,
which
is
great,
so
we're
gonna,
service
them
and
then
over
time
lost,
build
understand
if
we're
making
progress
towards
our
strategic
goals.
So
I
hope
that
helps
but
happy
to
dig
in
more.
You
want
to
talk
more
cool
thanks.
D
Or
I
think
I've
been
a
question.
It's
about
the
elsif
integration
we
should
recently
announce.
If
is
the
language
server
index
formats,
for
the
ones
who
doesn't
know
yet,
which
is
a
way
to
in
extra
codes,
and
then
we
could
do
intelligent
things
about
well.
Let
me
give
an
example:
jump
to
definition,
for
example,
especially
in
languages.
Go
I
wondered
what
division
is
and
where
we're
going
with
this,
and
what
the
next
iterations
were.
A
A
Regardless
of
you
know
you
deployment
target,
and
so
that
was
kind
of
the
rationale
for
striking
out
and
beginning
to
iterate.
On
this
in
the
first
place,
obviously
find
references
and
jumped
jump
to
definition.
Functionalities
is
is
important
and
that's
what
we're
continuing
today,
Don
I
would
say
that
if
you
look
at
slide
37
the
third
bullet
under
source
code,
there's
a
an
issue
linked
there,
which
is
to
basically
simplify
the
code.
A
Intel
setup
right
now,
it's
kind
of
difficult
to
use
and
to
enable,
and
so
we're
gonna,
simplify
that
and
launch
that
13
dotto,
and
so
that's
probably
the
next
iteration,
with
respect
to
to
code
search.
There's
also
work
going
on
on
the
elastic
search
side
as
well
for
like
doing
code
search
across
get
calm
overall
as
well
to
find
code
born
easily
across
a
whole
bunch
of
different
projects.
So
I
would
say
those
are
probably
the
next
next
two
things
that
we're
focused
on
Thanks.
D
D
A
C
The
flip
to
that
is
the
code
search
that
is
enabled
by
advanced
global
search
on
Caleb
comm,
which
does
exist
for
all
the
github
projects
and
the
good
iboard
that
can
search
across
projects.
So,
if
you
provided,
you
know
a
function
named
by
research
there,
you
would
be
able
to
see
kind
of
all
the
results
of
that
function
about
it
doesn't
have
the
intelligence
victim
yet
I
think
the
future
iterations
of
the
also
stuff
will
be
that
we'd
be
able
to
integrate
that
intelligence
into
those
results.
C
C
A
I
I
think
also
just
because
you
know
Caillou,
you
were
talking.
One
of
the
things
we've
been
talking
about
is
figuring
out
how
to
integrate
a
lot
of
this
functionality
better
into
the
web
IDE,
so
that
people
have
a
just
a
really
cool
experience
in
the
web
IDE.
So
that's
something
we're
also
considering
too
and
kind
of
merging
code
review
and
code
intelligence
and
making
it
a
really
cool.
First-Class
experience
inside
of
the
web
IDE
as
well.
A
A
A
Well,
I
will
give
a
small
plug
bin.
The
deck
is
is
rather
large,
so
as
you
thumb
through
it,
if
you
have
any
other
questions,
please
feel
free
to
drop
them
either
directly
to
me
or
in
the
product
channel
or
better.
Yet,
in
the
stage
group
channel
in
slack,
that's
the
most
relevance.
We
would
love
to
connect
and
engage
with
each
of
you
and
thanks
so
much
for
coming
nice.