►
From YouTube: [SPANISH] Iteración sobre los GitLab Group Runners
Description
Iteration about GitLab Group Runners
In this video, we show an iteration talking about GitLab Runners at Group Level.
En este video presentamos una Iteración hablando sobre los GitLab Runners a nivel de Grupo.
Issue -- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/37366
Juan Ramirez (Senior Product Designer)
Hugo Azevedo (Solution Architect)
Ricardo Amarilla (Technical Account Manager)
B
C
A
A
A
A
C
A
A
B
B
It
will
continue
to
behave
as
if
it
were
a
group,
only
true,,
then
it
will
not
have
visibility
of
the
pub
in
the
group,
because
the
subgroup
is
simply
a
and
let's
say
that
the
only
relationship
it
has
with
the
group
is
that
it
belongs
to,
or
is
part
of
that
group,,
but
a
bit
of
the
runners
themselves.
In
fact,.
If
you
go
to
the
subgroup,,
you
will
see
that
the
token
is
different
and.
C
A
Is
the
expected
behavior
here
are
some
queries:
To
see
one
more
thing,
Juan,
at
the
beginning
we
talked
about
how
this
was
useful
to
one
of
our
clients,.
It
seemed
like
they
should
activate
the
first
thing,
like
these
that
are
916
in
our
ortiz
project,,
but
in
this
wax
USA
we
can
see
that
it
is
already
activated
by
default.
It
pulls
it's
available
to
accept
exact.
B
B
B
B
Let's
say
that
ability
to
handle
things
at
the
instance
level.
So
what
we're
going
to
introduce
now
is
at
the
pool
level
the
ability
to
see
all
the
runners
below
of
the
d
that
are
part
of
the
group,
including
the
project
managers,
including
the
reuters
beings,
also,
the
shared
runners
and
part
of
that
is
also
the
ability
to
create
a
default,
that
is,
every
time.
B
B
We
have
a
builder
now
ex
to
death
are
the
eyes
art
com
and
one
of
the
aces
of
them
is
we
want
that
ability
to
have
that
management
at
the
group
level?
It
is
basically
to
make
a
better
of
what
happens
at
the
level
of
the
instance
in
salt,
for
you
at
the
group
level,
so
that
people
who
have
many
projects
can
manage
them
all
can
deactivate
runners.
They
can
do
what
they
do.
C
A
A
Clients
organize
our
brilliant
ones
here
at
home.,
I
see
each
group
as,
for
example,
development,
production
or
inclusion
in
the
unit.
It's
business,
yes,.
They
create
their
groups
for
different
projects,
for
example,
or
different
needs.
Within
that
same
group.-
That's
what
I
wanted
to
replicate?
Here,
ok,
in
that
same
ability
to
enable
and
disable
chart
runners
at
the
level
of
the
root
group
instance.
we
are
going
to
have
it
available.
A
That
is
the
reason
why
I
wonder
if
it
is
worth
putting
the
ability
to
do
this
administration
of
the
in
the
runners
groups,
also
at
the
subgroup
level
I
understand
if
I
want,
they
will
enable
all
the
projects,
children
of
a
subgroup.
The
group
runner
today
would
have
to
do
it
in
each
project.
It
is
not
so.
B
Correct
they
are
at
this
moment
if
that
free
management
does
not
exist,
nular
that
allows
you
to
go
and
deactivate
each
one
from
that
new
one.
So
if
you
wanted
to
do
it
at
this
moment,
you
would
have
to
go
to
each
project
and
deactivate
them
anderson
group
or,
let's
say
the
raiders,
which
is
something
that
many
consumers
also
do,
because
they
and
when
you
already
have
a
great
its
own,
it
is
very
unlikely
that
you
want
to
use
a
barn,
be
try
by
the
way
already
when
it
has
its
own
barn.
B
What
happens
at
this
moment?
The
idea
is
to
add
that
ability
to
stretch
everything
at
the
group
level,
the
subgroups
being
groups
themselves,
because
that's
just
a
nomenclature
is
going
to
have
the
ability
to
have
all
the
management
of
all
the
projects
that
are
under
and
the
subgroup
what
it
would
touch.
What
I'm
not
sure
is
what
happens
with
the
parent
group
that
no
I
wouldn't
have
to
look
at
it.
I
didn't
test
him,
I,
don't
know
if
he
has
visibility
within
the
subgroup.
B
B
The
projects
of
a
subgroup
from
the
bar
in
a
group,
but
I'm,
not
sure
about
that,.
So
that's
what
I
would
have
to
see.
It
seems
to
me
that
if
it
should
be
like
that,,
if
the
group,,
anyone
who
has
a
Twenty
raids
in
the
group
should
be
able
to
handle
any
runner
in
project
subgroups
in
everything
that
exists
at
debut,
because.
C
I
see
Juan
2
and
22
scenarios
as
a
great
advantage
since
I
see
their
flexibility
in
how
to
manage
how
one
can
plan
the
architecture
of
your
runners,
so
I
see
a
possibility
of
an
organization
that
has
a
more
closed
governance
movement.
You
seemed
to
create
runners
at
the
group
level
for
dre
and
want
a
way
to
force
guarantee
that
those
runners
are
used.
Of
course,
the
security
reason
governs
for
compliance,
I,
don't
know,
I,
don't
know
and
I
also
see
another
scenario
where
organizations
below
are
groups.
C
C
Worth
exactly
the
real
groups
that
are
broken,,
it
is
not
that
they
are
configured
in
a
parent
group
for
some
reason,
I.
Have
a
group
of
subgroup
below
that
in
this?
In
these
projects
of
those,
a
group
does
not
make
any
sense
to
us
to
use
these
servers
that
are
levels
of
complexity,
but
it
rained
in
an
interactive.
B
B
B
A
C
B
You
are
going
to
see
that
there
are
many.
There
are
a
couple
or
maybe
three
related
to
your
contact
lenses
with
other
things
about
e
related,
then
s
to
monitor
fasting.
We
are
also
going
to
do
something
to
differentiate
the
rugbiers
from
the
beings
or
type
the
subsequent
runners,
because
sometimes
there
is
confusion
in
all
the
concepts.
There
are
many
types
of
runners
wright.
B
The
group
does
not
specify
the
kit,
the
peruvian,
and
if
you
are
on
your
own
instance,,
there
is
a
cluster
runner
within
your
instance,,
so
there
are
clearings
to
other
sites
about
things
that
we
are
going
to
do
in
that
aspect,
to
add
more
clarity
to
the
concepts
of
runners
and
surely
this
will
help
to
the
only
to
the
coastal
mercy.
No,
no
to
us
also
when
we
are
having
these
conversations
to
be
able
to
have
clarity
about
what
we
are
talking
about.