►
From YouTube: Learning Experience Working Group Meeting 2022-01-19
Description
Learning Experience Working Team Meeting
A
B
So
this
is
just
like
a
fyi,
so
sorry,
there's
a
link
there
for
a
document
that
sanders
shared
with
us.
I
thought
it's
very
interesting,
so
everyone
should
give
it
a
a
read:
give
it
a
look
and
I've
added
to
the
google
drive
and
also
just
to
give
a
heads
up
that
we
do
have
a
google
drive.
So
I'm
pasting
everything
you
know
that's
relevant
for
this
project
to
the
drive.
Everyone
should
have
access.
C
C
Sort
of,
I
think
you've
got
to
sort
of
pay
to
play
with
some
of
the
lists
and
stuff
so
just
worth,
bearing
in
mind
that
if
there's
a
platform
we're
interested
in
that
doesn't
appear
on
these
lists
of
you
know
top
20
lxps
of
the
year
or
that
sort
of
thing,
then
it
might
not
be
that
it's
not
up
to
scratch.
It
might
just
be
that
they're,
not
necessarily
engaging
with
the
l
d
influencers
out
there.
B
I
have
the
next
c
as
well,
so
the
rfp
documentation
have
been
sent
to
the
vendors
there's
a
final
list
of
the
requirements
there.
Thank
you,
everyone
for
participating
and
getting
this
on
on
time
and
on
track.
Sorry
by
last
friday-
and
I
know
you
said
something
brian-
that
you
wanted
all
to
give
another
look
at
the
requirements.
Anything
you'd
like
to
add
there.
A
Yeah,
I
just
it
was
really
more
for
myself
to
be
honest,
but
I
thought
you
know
some
good
work
been
put
in
here
on
these
requirements
and
that
as
working
group
members,
we
all
owe
it
to
the
individuals
that
put
the
work
in
here
to
know
what
these
requirements
are
and
then
ask
clarifying
questions.
So
I
was
kind
of
hoping
to
get
it
done
prior
to
this
meeting,
but
I
think
we're
all
busy.
A
D
D
E
D
F
F
G
D
Do
we
know
how
how
this
is
going
to
be
funded?
I
know
like
the
context
of
the
first
one
was
where
we
kicked
it
off
and
ultimately
ended
up
in
some
kind
of
a
category
of
a
shared
budget
like
a
corporate
shared.
I
don't
remember
what
the
right
nomenclature
is,
but
is
that
known,
or
do
we
still
need
to
solve
for
that
or
where
the
money's
coming
from
that's.
A
A
great
question
my
assumption
and
we'll
need
to
verify
this
is
that
it's
going
to
fall
into
the
same.
It's
called
general
allocation
budget,
or
maybe
it
was
split
them
up
amongst
the
three
different
primary
users.
We
can
ask
ellen
boyd
that
question
and
we
can
figure
out
how
it's
going
to
get
separated
out.
E
Yeah,
that's
my
understanding
is
what
brian
is
it'll
it'll
stay
in
allocations,
but
I
think
it'll
be
carved
to
specific
allocations.
So
I'll
have
a
line
share
of
that
yeah
with
the
education
strategy
and
then
portion
of
that
dave
will
probably
come
out
of
mcb's
budget
and
the
portion
will
come
out
of
the
lmd
button.
C
B
Sorry,
I
think
I
do
yeah
point
three,
and
so
there
was
another
action
from
each
of
these
lmx
lxp
epic.
This
has
been
done
and,
like
you
requested
brian,
I
made
sure
that
it's
linked
with
our
handbook
page.
So
if
you
see
anything,
that's
not
correct.
Let
me
know,
but
that
should
be
up
today
and
we'll
keep
updating
it.
At
least
weekly.
B
And
then
20
is
also
an
action
for
me.
I'm
working
on
those
workflows
for
the
certification
paths
that
you
mentioned
right,
it'll
be
good
to
have
so
the
persona,
so
I'm
working
on
those
I'll
probably
have
to
reach
out
I'll,
say:
kendra
you're
the
best
person
to
help
me
with
that.
So
I'm
trying
to
create
some
workflows
for
what
we
hoping
to
always
the
those
paths.
So
are
you
the
best
person
to
help
me
just
confirm
if
that's
the
right
way
to
go.
A
Okay,
all
to
commit
to
complete
requirements
by
friday
january
14th.
I
think
we're
nearly
done.
There
may
be
some.
What
we'll
follow
up
with
the
other
to
do
item
for
all
of
us
to
take
a
look
and
if
there's
anything
else
for
clarification,
I
did
put
a
link
to
actually
says
enterprise
apps.
It's
actually
all
of
business
technologies,
q1,
okrs,
they're
still
in
whip
they're,
not
entirely
done,
but
they're.
Very
close
at
this
point.
A
A
So
I
don't
think
that
we
are
going
to
have
a
new
platform
up
in
place,
but
certainly
when
I
think
about
the
process
flow
barbara
that
you're
going
to
work
on.
I
think
that
that
would
be
a
good
like
you
know,
as
is
or
starting
to
be
new
as
is
or
interim
as
is,
and
then
how
we
apply
it
to
the
tool
going
forward.
A
E
My
apologies
I'll
show
you
that,
right
now,
when
you,
when
you
actually
can
get
into
the
document,
you'll
see
that
he
did
a
volume
pricing
sample
at
the
bottom.
I
have
a
another
one
with
him,
my
one
on
ones
with
him
or
every
wednesday,
so
I
will
follow
up
with
him
or
on
the
email
that
he
sent
make
sure
we
get
a
response
to
that.
A
A
A
For
me,
I
was
talking
to
myself
and
christopher,
but
I
mean
I
don't
you
know
I
don't
want
to
make
it
so
big
that
he's
feeling
overwhelmed,
but
I
also
don't
want
to
a
limit
to
people
that
are
interested.
You
know
another
option
potentially
is
in
the
working
group.
We
could
have
him
join
one
of
the
working
group
meetings
and
one
of
the
topics
could
just
be
for
us
to
pick
his
brand.
If
there's
some
specific
questions.
E
D
Well,
I'm
next,
I
feel
I've
left
it
as
green.
Like
I
shared
I
just,
I
need
to
make
time
to
review
the
requirements
the
I
am
gonna.
I
have
a
meeting
today
with
michelle
hodges
of
going
to
provide
her
with
an
update
the
so
a
couple
questions
one
my
my
strong
recommendation
to
her
is
like
I.
I
don't
think
there
needs
to
be
a
channel
person
on
this
working
group
if
they,
if
she
pushes
for
it
and
insists
on
having
somebody
on
there,
there
be
objections
to
that.
A
A
A
B
Oh
okay,
all
right
so
yeah
my
so
we
had
the
requirements
by
last
friday.
That's
then
our
if
you
have
been
sent
this
monday.
So
that's
done
so.
The
next
kind
of
like
milestones
that
we
have
is
the
bidder's
call
that's
happening
this
friday,
the
21st
and
then
we'll
be
waiting
for
responses
for
the
following
week.
So
basically
we're
still
going
to
be
working
on
it
until
the
end
of
this
this
month,
which
is
january
31st.
B
That's
when
we
expect
you
know
at
least
to
have
everything
back
from
the
from
the
vendors
and
also
the
demos
gonna
be
scheduled
for
the
first
week
of
february
correct.
So
this
is
just
like
the
timeline
that
I
have
now
so
until
the
first
yeah
first
week
of
february,
we're
still
going
to
be
working
on
that.
So
does
that
help
maybe
to
have
an
idea?
I
can
definitely
put
that
in
the
epic,
so
we
can
have
a
visual
to
help,
but
that's
the
far
as
I
I've
planned
for
this
at
this
stage.
D
G
I
just
don't
know
if
we're
going
to
be
creating
at
that
point:
custom
experiences
for
partners
or
if
it's
going
to
be
oh,
hey,
go
to.
You
know
the
same
portal
that
everyone
else
is
using
and
do
that.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
nuances
there,
because
our
you
know
main
focus
with
this
exercise
is
really
that
certification
program
making
sure
by
august
we've
lit
it
up
and
we
can
meet
that
deliverable
for
commit,
and
then
everything
else
is
sort
of
secondary
to
that.
D
A
Yep,
I
think
that
that's
fair.
I
think
right
now,
there's
just
heavy
caveats
for
all
of
us
right,
because
we
just
don't
know
we
don't
know,
but
I
think
that
that's
an
aspirational
date
for
the
channel
that
we
can.
We
can
target
for
sure
and
you're
right.
That's
not
going
to
meet
the
needs
for
a
ps,
we'll
have
to
figure
that
out.
D
Yeah,
okay,
super
fair
and
yep.
No
commitments
is
aspirational,
we'll
get
we'll
know
more,
as
we
gather
more
last
question
for
me,
the
four
vendors,
those
were
those
vendors
were
finalized.
The
ones
listed
in
the
epic
with
help
from
sundar
is
that
if
they
asked
the
question,
how
would
we
pick
those
four
to
issue
the
rfps
too?
Sorry,
if
I
missed
this
earlier.
G
Yeah,
so
so,
taking
from
a
larger
list,
I
think
we
got
input
from
all
of
this
group
got
the
larger
list.
We
started
to
cut
down
this
list,
this
group
blessed
it
and
then
sunder
blessed
it
as
well
and
said:
yeah.
Those
are
our
players
as
well.
So
that's
where
I
would
say
we
made
the
selection
and
then
validate
our
thinking
against
sunder.
A
F
F
C
Yeah,
I
think,
speaking
of
heavy
caveats
like
before,
we
see
the
demo
it's
hard
to
predict.
You
know
exactly
what
the
platforms
are
going
to
look
like,
but
it
seems
like
thought.
Industries
and
skill
jar
especially,
are
really
focused
on
the
the
customer
education
side
of
things,
and
they
look
like
they
might
be
like
really
excellent
platforms
for
the
professional
services
use
case.
C
It
looks
like
it
would
probably
hit
the
nail
on
the
head,
but
it
might
be
that
if
we
end
up
sort
of
going
down
the
route
with
those
two
in
particular,
obviously
we
need
to
get
a
look
at
them
all.
Then
we
might
need
to
be
prepared
for
field
enablement
and
l
d
to
sort
of
start
that
parallel
collaboration
on
what
platforms
would
work
best
for
those
two
departments
separate
from
a
platform.
That's
specifically
designed
for
customer
education
rather
than
employee
education.
C
A
I
love
that
so
just
to
be
clear.
What
we
have
decided
today
is
that
the
four
that
we
just
sent
this
out
for
rfp
those
are
for
that
meet
the
needs
for
customer
education
and
that
we
still
have
got
a
decision
to
make
around
internal
employee
education
just
stating
it
clearly.
I
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
it,
and
I
think
that
that's
we're
all
agreeing
to.
E
I
think
when
we
were
talking
to
cinder
about
it
just
to
just
to
clarify
it
was
with
the
intent
that
it
could
those
the
vendors
would
be
able
to
do
both
and-
and
there
are
use
cases
for
all
of
them.
Skill
jar,
for
example-
salesforce-
actually
uses
them
as
their
internal
yeah
internal
facing
enablement.
They
don't
actually
because
the
skills
are
not
what
trailhead
is
based
on,
so
that
just
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
were
going
forward
with
the
understanding
we're
trying
to
do
a
single
single
platform.
E
E
Fair
to
keep
him
keep
in
mind,
but
that's
just
especially
on
the
whole
product
education
piece
of
it
we're
going
to
be
servicing
both
customers
and
internals
for
the
project,
product
education
aspect
of
it.
So
what
I'm
looking
for?
That's
one
of
the
things
that
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
that
ability
to
do
role-based
access
for
anything.
That's
in
there.
A
A
F
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
say
you
know
our
our
lnd
budget
has
been
sort
of
reallocated
towards
recruiting
this
next
year.
Just
that's
where
all
eyes
are
right.
Now
I'm
hiring
more
sales
folks,
and
so
you
know
if
we
do
have
to
go
with
another
platform
that
that
could
have
implications
on
our
budget,
but
it.
E
One
quick
question
on
that
from
from
a
requirement
standpoint-
and
this
is
probably
for
josh
and
for
david-
is
there?
Is
there
any
specific
content
that
you're
looking
for
a
vendor
to
be
able
to
provide?
So
if
they,
if
they
do
offer
serving
up
content,
is
there
anything
specific
that
you're
looking
for
there.
F
I
mean
I
could
definitely
give
you
a
list
of
you
know
some
things
that
I
would
want
to
look
for.
If
there's
you
know
already
self-service
content
available
on
those
platforms
for
like
leadership
or
manager,
training,
or
you
know,
value
alignment
and
soft
skills.
That
would
be
amazing
yeah
I
can.
I
can
give
you
a
list.
F
G
Yeah
the
only
risk
I
wanted
to
call
out
there
is.
You
know
we
were
surprised
by
procurement
that
it
sounds
like.
There
was
a
previous
scenario
with
this,
but
sap
litmus
has
identified
that
with
our
current
timeline.
They
may
not
be
able
to
get
an
nda
signed
and
meet
us
in
time
because
we
do
a
custom
nba.
So
I
think
ashley
is
leaning
into
that
to
understand
what
we
can
do,
but
that
could
impact
that
litmus
being
a
part
of
this
particular
exercise.
E
G
G
Yeah-
and
it
goes
back
to
like,
I
think
we
we
had
signed
one
previously-
we
just
don't
know
what
language
has
changed,
and
so
we
need
to
understand
that,
because
my
understanding
and
getting
it
signed
before
you
know,
this
is
based
on
secondary
information
from
ashley
is
that
it
took
us
a
few
weeks
to
get
that
done.
Yeah.
A
That
would
be
awesome,
even
if
it's
just
straw,
man
timeline,
I
think
it'll
make
everyone
feel
good
about
working
march
and
then
I'm
going
to
ask
ellen
boyd
about
current
edcast
allocation
and
review
review.
If
this
is,
this
will
still
hold
going
forward.
Also,
the
change
in
l
d
moving
to
recruiting-
I
don't
I
mean
I'm
going
to
make
the
assumption
that
the
fpa
partners
have
made
the
appropriate
budgetary
changes.
But
maybe
we
will
ask
about
that
as
well,
and
then
also
everyone
to
review
the
everyone
to
review
the.
H
H
A
Kendra,
I
am
so
glad
you
just
mentioned
that
there's
some
education
also,
it
was
funny.
I
was
talking
to
craig
nostell
and
he's
all
what
is
scorm
right,
and
so
I
think
we
got
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
that's
probably
why
yeah
people
assume
like
that.
They
know
things
like
this,
and
I
I
can't
remember
what
the
acronym
stands
for
honestly.
I
used
to
know
but
anyways.
I
know
what
it
is,
but
I
I
think
you're
spot
on
that.
H
I
did
I
did
a
primer
for
all
of
the
content
curators
about
a
year
ago.
I
think
it's
on
our
youtube
channel
that
talks
about
the
different
delivery
methods
and
the
different
instructional
design
technologies,
I'll
find
that
and
I'll
link
it
over
to
you.
But
I
just
think
that
it
would
be
a
really
good
time
to
take
out
what's
outdated
and
ensure
that
we
don't
move
it
over.
H
So
we
do,
I
had
one
written
up
with
isaac
when
he
was
here,
and
I
I've
also
shared
that
with
jamie
and
evening
before
she
went
on
maternity
leave.
So
it's
something
that
we've
had
internally.
I
don't
know
if
we
have
it
like
actually
documented
in
the
handbook.
I
know
we
had
it
in
our
note
stock
for
our
idc,
so
I
will
dig
it
out
and
I'll
find
it
share
it
with
you.