►
From YouTube: Sid + L&D - Biggest Risks (Handbook Second)
Description
Biggest Risks Handbook Page: https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/leadership/biggest-risks/#handbook-second
A
Hi,
I'm
jc
on
the
learning
and
development
team
at
get
lab
and
I'm
joined
here
by
sid,
get
lab
ceo
and
co-founder
today
during
this
handbook
learning
session,
we're
going
to
be
talking
about
biggest
risks
and
in
particular
handbook.
Second,
so
sid,
can
you
talk
to
us
a
little
bit
about
why
it's
important
that
we
maintain
handbook?
First.
B
Yeah,
I
think
in
any
other
company
I've
seen
it's
not
that
they
don't
have
kind
of
a
knowledge
management
system.
It's
that
the
knowledge
management
system
doesn't
contain
the
stuff
you
want
to
know.
It
doesn't
contain
everything
and,
most
importantly,
it's
out
of
date.
So
as
soon
as
your
handbook
becomes
out
of
date,
people
are
gonna.
B
Ask
something
else
in
the
handbook:
they're
gonna
ask
people
they're,
gonna,
call
and
then
the
consequence
of
that
is,
it
gets
further
out
of
date
because
things
don't
get
updated
anymore.
So
I
think
after
you
pass
a
certain
threshold,
it's
almost
impossible
to
get
to
a
company-wide
knowledge
management
system.
A
Definitely
yeah,
I
think
when
I
joined
the
handbook
was
under
1000
pages.
Maybe
so
it's
been
interesting
to
like
watch
it
grow
and
kind
of
see
what
how
it's
evolved
and
how
much
information
has
been
added.
I
think
people
have
really
emphasized
using
the
handbook,
so
leaders
model
the
behavior
and
culture
of
gitlab
team
members,
look
to
leaders
to
live
our
values
and
be
examples
of
them.
How
does
leadership
model
handbook
first
and
if
they
aren't,
what
should
we
do.
B
Yeah,
I
think
leadership
is
responsible
for
working
handbook
first
themselves.
So
if
you
have
a
change,
communicate
it
through
a
handbook
change
not
through
an
email
or
a
presentation
or
another
way,
so
the
leader
should
be
making
handbook
changes
or
directing
people
to
make
handbook
changes,
and
people
should
speak
up
if
a
change
is
communicated
in
a
non-handbook
way,
if
there's
an
email
without
a
link
to
a
diff,
but
we're
doing
this
this
way
from
now
on,
it
should
be
like
hey.
Should
this
be
handbook?
First.
B
A
Yeah
awesome
great
point
and
then
with
a
growing
team,
how
do
we
ensure
that
new
team
members
really
see
the
importance
of
being
handbook?
First.
B
If
you've
been
at
gitlab
for
a
while,
if
you're
new
you're
like
wow,
it's
pretty
awesome,
I
can
find
everything
I
need
to
do
my
job,
so
we
we
should
kind
of
keep
stressing
that
that
that
is
kind
of
unnatural,
but
that
we
greatly
benefit
from
it
and
then
also
kind
of
acknowledge
that,
yes,
the
handbook
takes
more
time
to
change
than
it
would
be
just
firing
off
an
email
to
someone,
but
the
benefits
of
it
compound
because
we
change
the
process
once,
but
we
implement
it
many
times
we
train
many
people
in
it,
etc,
and
the
next
change
can
kind
of
build
on
the
change
you
had
or
if
you
would
have
sent
the
email
with
the
process.
B
Change
like
it
doesn't
reach
new
team
members,
it's
forgotten.
After
a
year
an
exchange
is
made
and
it
doesn't
take
account
the
email
you
send
half
a
year
ago,
so
it
gets
changing.
The
handbook
is
harder
than
sending
out
the
email
or
the
presentation,
and
we
have
to
acknowledge
that
but
say
hey,
it's
worth
it
because
over
time,
the
benefits
compound.
A
Yeah,
definitely
being
on
teams
that
have
grown,
I
can
totally
attest
to
having
stuff
in
the
handbook
making
things
it
is
time
consuming
to
add
to
the
handbook,
but
it
definitely
makes
things
easier
as
more
team
members
come
on
board,
so
awesome.
Well.
Those
are
the
questions
that
I
had
on
this
topic.
So
thank
you
so
much
for
taking
the
time
to
record
this
video
on
handbook.
Second
sid.
I
really
appreciate.