►
From YouTube: 2019 08 19 Memory Team Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
So
yeah
this
one's
super
high
priority
right
now
Camille
is
reviewing
the
latest
changes
from
Jinyu
Jinyu
has
been
cranking
through
a
bunch
of
work
on
this
one.
So
he's
it's
one
of
those
issues
that
just
keeps
on
giving
right.
They
keep
finding
new
things.
New
opinions,
oh
hey!
We
should
do
it
this
way.
You
should
end
this
thing,
so
I
think
one
of
the
things
we
can
review
as
a
team,
especially
during
the
retro
just
calling
out
things
MVC.
A
This
one
Lexi
and
I
just
talked
about,
so
there
were
some
ideas
for
long-term
improvement,
short-term
there's
an
EM
are
out
there
that
might
work.
We
just
need
to
get
a
database
review
on
it
and
see
if
we
can
shift
the
mr
that's
in
there
and
then
break
off
the
new,
mr
or
sorry,
a
new
issue
for
supporting
new
line,
delimited
JSON
and
all
the
complications
that
could
involve
migrating,
detecting,
etc.
So,
we'll
look
at
that
for
12:3
work
then
can
use
on
the
version
wrapping
up
this.
A
A
A
If
that
community
contributors
work
closes
this
one
out,
then
that
will
go
away
and
then
what's
not
shown
here,
because
it's
on
a
different
board
is
infrastructure,
work
for
Puma,
so
continuing
to
build
out
their
grip
on
the
dashboards.
So
we
can
measure
the
changes
that
we
make
to
the
infrastructure.
A
B
No
I'm
working
on
adding
success
thresholds
to
that
performance
tool
kit.
So
when
you
run
out
k-6
tests
they'll
come
back
and
it
should
say
yeah.
This
is
actually
fine,
or
this
is
the
you
know.
It's
a
rough
guide
knowing
that
that's
actually
really
complex,
because
each
environment
is
a
little
bit
different
and
deterrent
slightly
different
values,
and
sometimes
some
virus
will
turn
substantially
higher
values
and
like
a
simple
one,
being
staging
will
return
a
very
high
count
for
listing
projects
because
obviously
there's
a
lot
of
projects
on
staging
than
any
other
environments.
B
So
we've
got
we
not
to
make
that
clean.
But
that
being
said,
looking
at
that
again
and
looking
at
it
on
getting
overcome
as
world
a
10-4
in
particular
seems
to
really
degrade
substantially
the
more
projects
there
isn't
in
the
environment,
which
makes
sense
initially
do
better
look
at
the
look
at
how
she
was
doing
is
always
just
returning
20,
because
as
pagination
and
Max
you
can
make
it
return
a
hundred.
So
there
is
probably
something
non
performant
happening
there,
as
probably
is
absolutely
parsing
the
entire
list
of
projects.
B
That,
probably,
is
one
that
needs
to
be
improved
so
before
I
want
a
reason
issue
in
that
and
because
and
get
loud
that
took
30
seconds
for
that
endpoint
to
return
so
that
one
really
is
I
think
that's
just
bad
cool
in
the
background.
I
think
that
could
easily
be
improved
from
pre
and
pre
Puma.
They
do
have
one
endpoint
that
thus,
for
some
reason
return
much
higher
bonds,
and
that
is
actually
just
returning.
The
information
on
the
branch,
a
particular
branch
in
the
projects-
I,
don't
know
why
that's
happening
yet.
B
Interestingly,
people
is
behalf
of
what
providers
and
peek
over
is
half
appears.
So
that's
good
for
for
you
as
sure
when
the
premise
doing
good
stuff,
but
I
am
a
still.
They
want
to
have
seconds
with
pre
and
it's
both
free
sex
for
free.
It
literally
is
just
like
it's
not
even
that
big.
It's
like
a
very
small
Jason
offices
branch.
Is
it
the
name?
This
is
the
last
community
information
so
again
that
could
be
I'm,
not
c9,
or
else
I'm,
not
saying
that
I'm
staging
I,
think
or
the
10k
environment.
B
So
I
don't
know
why
that
one's
particularly
bad
on
the
another
preening
people
are
very
much
the
same
environment.
So
on
those
on
that
itself,
this
must
be
something
wrong.
I
would
partly
lean
more
towards
environmental
on
that
one,
but
I
serve,
and
when
it
contains
advanced
case,
so
you
might
still
see
an
issue
coming
out,
so
that's
the
too
much
color
abnormal.
B
Sadly,
the
projects,
API
I,
think
we'll
definitely
begin
raise
myself,
I'm
not
going
to
call
it
that
for
the
12
free
or
anything
that
I'm
just
raising
that
waiver
that
naturally
fit
since
the
order
is
fine-
and
this
probably
be
like
that
for
a
long
time.
So
as
what's
called
those
the
will
be
Morehead
points
coming
in
10
issues.
B
A
A
A
Anyway,
we're
not
gonna
get
chosen,
so
we're
not
going
for
now.
It's
not
enough
forever.
It's
just
a
no
for
q4,
so
we'll
probably
close
the
issue,
and
then
we
can
just
copy
it
and
reopen
it
for
a
subsequent
time
if
it
makes
sense,
so
you
don't
have
to
worry
about
planning
for
travel
in
q4
now
called.
B
B
A
Know
it
would
have
been,
it
would
have
been
awesome,
but
as
we're
still
forming
as
a
team,
I
think
and
I'm
just
conjecture,
I,
don't
know
what
it
is.
Thinking
was
behind
these
things,
but
they
have
a
fully
formed
section
they're
fairly
new.
They
have
a
bunch
of
high
priority
work
like
we
do
as
well,
but
I.
B
Know
we're
making
I
know
when
the
other
is
making
a
search
team
as
well.
Yes,
I
wonder
if,
in
the
future,
we
can
maybe
try
again
will
under
that
bigger
umbrella
like
search
and
memory,
maybe
is
it
the
engagement
umbrella?
Is
that
right,
my
enablement,
yeah
he'll
win
this
alone.
Yeah.
B
You
could
try
again
next
year
with
a
enablement
if
they're
willing
to
fill
up.
You
know
20
people
faster,
that's
it
if
they
wanna
spend
more
money
than
you
know
us
find
me
and
that's:
okay,
yeah!
Maybe
that's
worth
an
idea
once
the
starts
team
is
obstacle
and
is
one
person
alone.
I
was
on
the
call
and
since
call
discouraged
so
step
priority
for
him
as
well.
Mmm-Hmm.
A
A
Okay,
anyway,
it's
a
hiring
update,
so
we
actually
what
candidates
for
search
which
is
good,
put
out
two
offers
last
week
to
folks.
So
that's
we're
on
the
recording
I'm,
not
gonna.
Mention
names,
one
of
them's
internal,
one
of
them's
external,
the
internal
he's
on
PTO
right
now,
so
we'll
hear
back
when
he
gets
back
and
I
think
they'll
be
any
problems.
They're
external
I
just
need
to
follow
up
on
that
one
to
see
where
we
are,
and
then
we
have
a
third
candidate
identified.
A
They've
got
some
good,
strong
feedback,
so
maybe
full
here
soon
we'll
see.
Is
it
from
my
man
right,
not
much
okay,
good
to
hear
yeah,
so
we
need
to
fill
up
the
working
board
a
little
more.
If
we
have
more
folks
in
the
coming
months,
mmhmm
yeah,
absolutely
alright
and
then
I
don't
know
if
you
all
saw
the
the
notes
and
the
emails
going
by,
but
the
legacy
labels
team
labels
are
being
deprecated.
So
the
oh
just
a
memory.
It
has
a
big
deprecated
symbol
next
to
it
or
a
deprecated
word
next
to
it.
A
So
not
using
those
anymore.
We're
sticking
with
the
group
and
section
Michael's
or
group
and
stage
labels,
so
everything
should
be
built
off
group
double
:
memory
and
I
actually
had
to
go
fix
the
board's
because
they
have
both
labels
in
there.
So
it
was
excluding
some
work,
but
should
all
be
up
to
date.
Team
pages
up
today
linking
out
to
the
right
boards,
so.