►
From YouTube: Verify:Testing 13.7 Refinement kickoff
Description
The Verify:Testing team is going to do more async refinement for the 13.7 milestone. This is a walk through of the planning issue on Oct. 27, 2020 to identify key deliverable issues and bugs, items that need refinement and next steps for the team. This is just a point in time and the issue board is always our Single Source of Truth: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/issues?scope=all&utf8=%E2%9C%93&state=opened&label_name[]=group%3A%3Atesting&milestone_title=13.7
Planning Issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ci-cd/testing-group/-/issues/20
A
Hey
folks,
I
wanted
to
provide
just
a
quick
walk-through
for
the
13-7
planning
issue,
as
we
kick
off
our
refinement
for
13-7
asynchronously
in
testing
this
time
so
trying
that
out.
Thank
you,
ricky
for
adding
all
the
capacity.
In
the
note
this
this
work
is
over
the
u.s
holiday
thanksgiving
and
is
getting
close
to
u.s
holiday
christmas
or
christmas
holiday.
So
we
anticipate
some
reduced
capacity
on
this
milestone.
A
A
A
When
a
screenshot
is
captured
on
a
failed
test,
they
can
just
see
those
directly
in
the
pipeline.
The
next
top
deliverable
is
the
test
history
mvc,
providing
that
in
the
full
unit
report.
This
is
a
continuation
of
the
feature
that
we're
going
to
start
in
actually
13-6
if
there
are
a
milestone
here,
I'll
fix
that
of
taking
that
test
history,
the
the
mvc
for
that
proving
out
that
this
is
valuable
data
and
then
we
can
build
on
that
in
later
milestones
and
then,
lastly,
the
front
end
or
the
customer
facing
features
is
graphing.
A
The
average
code
coverage
of
all
projects
in
a
group.
This
is
delivering
that
finishing
delivery
of
that
gitlab
premium
feature:
that's
going
to
drive
an
increase
in
our
performance
indicator,
and
this
is
a
link
out
to
the
dashboard.
So
you
can
take
a
look
so
kind
of
following
that
theme
on
the
performance
indicator.
A
So
when
I
looked
this
morning,
issues
requiring
refinement,
we
only
have
seven
left
awesome
work
so
far,
there's
already
a
chunk
that
have
a
weight
on
them.
Thank
you.
So
much
specific
back
end
things.
I
only
see
two
that
are
labeled
back
end
moving
the
code,
quality
comparison
logic
into
the
back
end
and
then
creating
the
partial
report
as
a
pipeline
artifact
for
use
in
the
code
quality.
A
A
Some
user
experience
work,
that's
coming
up.
Vitica
is
going
to
be
working
on
the
design
for
adding
a
notice
to
the
file
header
in
the
mrdiff.
This
is
our
first
step.
A
So
that's
being
designed
in
thirteen
seven,
some
active
research
projects
that
we
have
going
on,
I'm
still
working
on
code,
category
maturity
scorecard.
I
anticipate
that
to
probably
bleed
over
into
thirteen
seven
a
little
bit
or
trickle
over
into
thirteen
seven
and
the
code
quality
job
to
be
done.
Research
I'll
also
be
kicking
off,
probably
during
thirteen
seven
job
to
be
done.
Research
for
web
browser,
web
browser
performance
testing
and
another
of
our
categories
probably
usability.
A
I
can't
remember
I'll
stop
my
head
problem,
validation,
I'm
still
going
back
and
forth
on
the
code
coverage
reports.
I
think
I
just
need
to
get
that
closed
out
and
no
solution.
Validation
happening
in
this
milestone.
A
A
couple
of
top
bug
fixes.
We
found
out
from
a
customer
that
the
group
code
coverage
report
is
only
using
the
master
of
branch
name,
so
we
should
be
using
whatever
their
default
branch
name
is
instead
of
that
hard-coded
one
so
that
they
can
get
data
in
that
downloaded
report
and
the
code
coverage
on
the
project
view.
Probably
on
the
group
view
as
well,
always
shows
a
hard-coded
window
of
three
months
of
data.
A
We
should
actually
have
that
reflect
how
much
data
there
is,
if
possible,
so
debatable
if
that's
a
bug,
fix
or
an
enhancement
and
then
finally,
okay,
our
alignment
just
want
to
talk
through
these
real,
quick,
so
tracking
paid
features
that
set
of
three
things:
this
maps
up
to
one
of
the
q4
products,
okrs
100
of
the
devops
groups,
having
a
protected
predicted
paid
gmail
with
instrumentation
dashboards
and
quarterly
targets.
So
this
helps
us
move
forward
with
that
test.
History,
mvc
that
is
going
to
help
drive
increase
in
stage
monthly
active
users.
A
This
is
a
key
feature
for
us
in
getting
users
converted
over
from
other
ci
solutions
to
gitlab
ci
graphing,
the
average
code
coverage
driving
additional
paid
smell,
so
additional
users
within
our
stage
who
are
using
paid
features
and
finally,
that
pipeline
tab
back
to
the
increase
in
usage
for
the
stage
monthly
active
users.
So
we
anticipate
that
this
will
help
drive
that
at
least
within
our
group,
hopefully
at
the
stage
as
well.
A
So
things
to
pay
attention
to.
I
just
wanted
to
call
out
that
there
are
two
issues
in
this
milestone
that
changed:
the
user
interface
on
the
unit
test
report,
the
unit
test
history
and
the
pipeline
tab.
So
let's
just
make
sure
we
coordinate
on
those
team
feel
free
to
add
more
things
to
pay
attention
to,
as
you
review
the
issues
there
and
then
planning
tasks,
I
can
now
check
off
describe
how
the
milestone
aligns
and
it's
back
to
you
thanks
folks.