►
From YouTube: Plan stage weekly 2021-06-03
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Sorry,
I
we
sorry
I've
reordered
it,
so
we
just
turned
on
graphqlboarzon.com
this
morning.
We
want
to
default
it
on
for
everybody
in
14
zeros.
So
if
you
find
any
bugs,
please
let
us
know
so
we
can
fix
it.
It's
been
a
very
long
time
coming.
I'm
very
excited
to
see
that.
Thank
you
julian,
for
taking
care
of
a
lot
and
the
past
few
months.
It
was.
C
B
It
was
a
very
long
time
coming.
We
can
default
it
on.
We
can
use
it.
There's
still
a
few
things
to
fiddle
with,
to
be
able
to
actually
remove
all
of
the
legacy
code,
but
I'm
hoping
to
start
deleting
stuff
in
141.
Sorry,
fun
things
yeah,
I
it
doesn't.
I
don't
know
if
anyone
has
questions,
if
you
have
any
questions,
ask
them
ask
away,
but
it's
more
like
I'm
letting
you
know
and
please
raise
bugs
basically.
A
C
B
A
B
A
Yeah
so
when
we
go
through
and
how
many
places
are
there,
there's
quite
a
few
places
in
code
that
looks
through
this,
that
uses
this
feature
flag
right.
B
And-
and
there
are
like,
I
recently
found
out
about
the
fact
that
we
still
use
some
legacy
code
involved
scope
so
we'll
have
to
delete
things
in
like
we'll
have
to
iterate,
actually
even
removing
legacy
code.
But
we
can't
remove
anything
like
what
I
would
do
is
that
we
defaulted
on
now
and
then
we
delete
the
feature
flag.
So
we
like
always
load
the
pretty
new
version,
and
then
we
can
start
deleting
like
legacy
components
and
then
models
and
then
probably
some
jquery
later.
A
Okay,
yeah
got
you
yeah,
so
so
right
now
there's
in
a
lot
of
places.
There
are
there's
a
condition
all
right
like
if
the
feature
flag
is
on
show
the
new
the
graphql
boards
else
show
the
old
stuff
yeah
like.
Can
we
just?
Can
we
go
through
and
delete
the
we'll.
A
C
B
A
We
don't
really
have
to
default
it
on
like.
Sometimes
we
just
skip
that
step
and
just
remove
the
feature
flag
code,
yeah.
B
A
Yeah,
but
I
mean
so
that's
right
now-
is
what
we're
testing
for
dot
com
right
like
by
by
turning
it
on
for
dot
com.
We
have
the
time
right
now,
flip
it
back
off.
If
we
want
to
you
know,
please.
A
B
B
A
B
A
So
say
we
we
default
it
on
early
in
14
1.
B
B
A
Yes,
so
as
long
as
we're
not
rushing
to
get
it
out
in
14-0
just
to
default,
it
in
14-0.
B
B
B
A
E
B
A
B
It
on
and
within
the
next
two
weeks
before
14
is
released
I'll
check
with
gabe
what
he
thinks
he's
probably
going
to
watch
the
recording,
probably.
C
Or
no
kristen
is
you
know
the
the
person
for
it?
Yes,.
B
There's
car
owning
now
but
yeah
like
I
advocate
to
turn
it
on
to
default
it
on
in
14-0,
but
yeah.
We
can.
B
A
B
Jason
kristen-
I
just
created
it
this
morning.
If,
if
the
pipeline
passes,
then
it
will
be
ready
and
then
we
need
thumbs
up
from
product
as
well.
C
By
the
way,
we
still
need
to
merge
that
documentation
update
mri.
It
looks
really
close
to
being
one.
That's
with
me.
C
Yes,
it's
all
reviewed
and
it's
ready
to
go
your
pleasure.
A
Okay,
cool
beach,
flag
fixes
julian.
You
want
to
go
through
your.
C
I
know
I'm
just
letting
you
know
that
so
we're
like
mixing
classic
board
like
if
you
go
from
classic
fours
into
streamlines
the
labels,
they
just
disappear.
The
labels
that
were
set
in
the
filter
bar
and
this
bug
would
disappear
once
we
start
using
graphql
boards
for
the
entire
each
board,
so
yeah
just
letting
you
know
that.
B
A
B
B
Oh
okay,
cool
swim
lanes
performance,
we're
currently
testing
virtual
lists,
on.com,
I'm
not
sure
it
makes
any
difference,
so
that's
kind
of
it's
behind
a
feature
flag.
So
it's
easy
to
remove.
In
my
opinion,
it
makes
no
difference
around
the
time
I
introduced
it
on
swim
lanes.
We
actually
removed
it
from
road
map,
so
I
just
want
to
know
if
anyone
has
seen
any
improvements
in
the
way
swim
lanes
get
loaded,
if
not
I'll,
just
delete
virtual
list.
B
If
there
is
an
improvement,
I
can
leave
it.
However,
we've
been
having
conversation
mostly
with
yarn,
around
swimlane's
performances
and
the
way
we
load
epics,
and
we
definitely
need
to
make
some
changes.
We're
waiting
for
alexis
to
be
back
from
holidays
to
discuss
because
it
likely
requires
a
ux
change
but
yeah
like
there's
a
lot
of
conversations
happening
around
swimlane's
performance
virtual
list
was
one
thing
that
I
wanted
to
test,
but
if
there's
been
no
improvement
and
we
change
the
way
we
load
fx
I'll,
just
remove
it.
E
E
B
If
you
find
the
link
just
throw
it
in
the
document
and
I'll
have
a
look
object
like
it's
good,
to
see
a
measurement.
B
The
goal
with
virtual
list,
I
think,
is
more
of
it's
more
like
a
visual
like
I
want
to
see,
if,
like
users
can
like,
feel
the
difference,
because
the
problem
with
swim
lanes
when
there's
a
lot
of
epics,
is
that
sometimes
the
page
goes
blank
or
like
the
scroll
is
laggy,
and
all
that-
and
I
was
hoping
virtual
list-
would
make
that
a
bit
smoother.
I
don't
think
it
does
like
from
a
user
perspective.
I
just
I
haven't
seen
it
that
actually.
C
Was
a
snappier,
but
the
problem
is
really
the
initial
loading
rather
than.
B
I
know
I
know
yeah,
we
just
need
to
change
honestly.
I
think
the
best
way
to
do
it
is
just
to
change
the
phasing
strategies
for
epics
yarn
agrees
on
that,
but
we
can't
make
a
decision
without
ux,
so
we'll
wait
and
make
further
changes,
I'm
leaning
towards
just
getting
rid
of
virtual
lists
when
we
change
the
way
we
load
epics,
so
yeah.
C
E
B
It's
it's
behind
a
feature
flag
anyway,
so
it's
easy.
It's
easy
to
remove
it's
easy
to
turn
off
and
on
and
do
whatever
I'm
kind
of
keen
to
just
keep
making
improvements
to
swim
lanes
and
then
we'll
see.
B
I
just
wanted
to
raise
it
because
we
haven't
really
talked
about
it
like
I've
introduced
virtualist
a
while
ago,
and
I
only
turned
it
on
recently.
Yeah
just
want
people
feedback
on
it.
A
Yeah
another
thing
we
need
to
fix
and
it's
not
so
much
related
to
swim
lanes
specifically,
but
it's
just
around
epic
filtering
for
gitlab.org,
like
it's
impossible
right
now
to
search
for
an
epic,
because
what
before
we
were
doing
when
we
were
planning
around
epic
boards
like,
I
would
have
loved
to
see
mvc1
mvc2
mvc3
on
the
same
board
sorted
by
swimlanes,
and
we
should
have
been
able
to
filter
by
the
parent
epic.
A
B
A
The
id,
but
on
filtered
search,
we
use
the
id,
but
we
have
no
way
of
knowing
what
the
id
is.
Unless
we.
A
Yeah
yeah
there
is
to
do
some
work
on
that.
A
A
Sorry,
what's
the
feature
flag
turned
on
for
for
virtual
list,
it's.
B
A
A
The
agenda
is
a
good
doc,
I'll
link
that
also,
which
are
some
of
the
questions
that
we
had,
that
we're
still
kind
of
thinking
through
you
hear
those
extremely
loud
crows.
In
the
background.
C
A
They're
so
loud
so
yeah,
the
agenda
is
a
good
doc
to
take
a
look
at
start
thinking
through
any
other
additional
questions.
There's
not
as
many
on
the
front
end
as
there
is
on
the
back
end
primarily
around
like.
If
this
is
a
whole
new
object.
How
are
we
going
to
handle
like?
Are
we
going
to
extend
the
current
issue
table
or
are
we
going
to?
A
Are
we
going
to
have
a
whole
new
table
with
these
objects
that
will
eventually
migrate
over
which
led
to
the
question
of
like?
Do?
We
want
a
button
where
people
can
like
for
epics
where
they
can
migrate
or
transform
it
into
a
version?
Two
epic?
So
there's
just
similar
questions
to
that.
I
don't
think
we
really
got
to
too
many
answers
today,
which
is
okay,
it's
just
a
kickoff,
but
those
are
the
types
of
things
that
we're
going
to
want
to
start
thinking
through
before
we
actually
start
working
on
the
implementation
details.
E
Probably
would
would
necessitate
kind
of
like
what
we
do
with
effort
boards
meeting
every
once
in
a
while.
Oh
very
good,.
A
Yeah
we,
we
probably
should,
I
think,
that's
a
good
idea.
For
the
most
I
mean
if
we
can
get
into
a
like
a
lot
of
these
things
would
be
it's
hard
to
get
the
whole
team
together
to
have
the
meeting.
So
if
we
can
also
figure
out
how
to
do
this
so
that
everyone
on
the
team
is
involved
and
determine
like
what
what
we
can
do,
asynchronously
that'll
be
good,
but
yeah.
It's
always
good
to
have
a
sync
meeting
for
huge
things.
Refactors
like
this.
E
I
mean
for
epic
boards,
for
example,
it's
not
even
a
big
meeting
like
it's,
not
anything
that
you
can't
find
out
from
looking
in
the
various
things.
So
it's
not
sort
of
a
lack
of
transparency
or
anything,
it's
more
like
making
sure
everyone's
on
the
same
page
and
catching
up
with
the
broader
view
of
things
which
I
don't
know
about
you
sorry,
I
found
it
quite
valuable.
A
Cool
there's
also
the
slack
channel.
I
think
it's
feat
or
f
underscore
planning
object.
A
Yeah
f
underscore
planning
object,
which
will
have
some
some
discussions
on
it.
There,
too.
C
Yo,
I
thought
simon,
you
advertise
it
as
the
next
big
thing
couple
weeks
ago,
like
when
you're
working
on
something
was
that
my
sorry,
my
mouse
is
not
did.
A
C
Yeah
so
yeah,
because
jolie
mentioned
something
about
you
know
just
brushing
up
on
the
ux.
I
always
animate
github
in
this
regard,
like
not
having
that
side,
you
know
on
the
left
like
on
the
left
right.
We
have
the
side
menu
with
a
bunch
of
stuff.
I
just
don't
know
why,
but
it
just
feels
cluttered
like
really
when
I
see
that
menu
and
was
wondering
if
we
were
gonna
have
this
universal
like
planning
object,
maybe
we
could
add
an
option
to
hide
that
a
small
thing
not
yeah.
C
C
When
you're
working
on,
like
hiding
the
like
the
left,
sidebar
like
when
you're
checking
out
the
issue
page
like
show
page.
A
Okay,
so
I
think
they're
working
on,
I
don't
know
if
it
affects
anything
on
the
left
side
bar
if
it's
just
this
navigation
yeah
the
supernav,
adding
that
to
the
top.
I
think.
D
You
know
this
there's
a
bunch
of
new
sidebar
stuff
going
on
right
now.
This.
C
D
A
B
Pretty
funny
because
I
actually
just
reviewed
something
related
to
that
super
knives
this
morning,
so
I'll
have
access
to
that
talking
about
the
top
thing
where
it's
like
one
menu
and
then
you
have
like
project
groups
and
so
on
right,
yeah,
yeah,
so
I'll
have
the
issue
close
by.
I
didn't
even
know
it
was
a
thing
until
two
hours
ago.
A
B
B
B
D
A
Super
gradient:
what's
the
gradient
look
like
in
dark
mode.
A
A
Cool
charlie
hi,
hello,.
E
Hello
yeah,
epic
boards-
I
I
just
wanted
to
put
you
know
just
point
to
the
discussion
we've
been
having
about
epic
boys.
Just
it's
just
our
catch
up
a
feature
ketchup.
You
know
how
we're
going
how's
our.
How
is
everything
kind
of
progressing
along,
and
so
I
think
it's
like
two
issues.
I
think
where
we'd
really
like
to
get
them
into
fortuner.
One
is
quite
important,
which
is
the
reordering
of
epics
within
a
list
and
between
lists.
E
So
that's
in
review
with
me
the
back
end
and
then
the
front
end,
I
think,
is.
I
think
it's
quite
quite
simple.
I
hope
I'm
saying
I
hope
that's
right
anyway.
The
front
end,
I
think,
is
okay,
because
you
just
add
some
feels
and
then
and
then
it's
ready
so
yeah
that
should
cross
fingers
should
be
emerged
this
week,
I'm
pretty
confident
about
that,
but
then
yeah,
so
it's
just
sort
of
finding
bugs
and
and
making
sure
that
we
ship
something
fairly
solid
for
14
hours.
It's
very
exciting.