►
From YouTube: PD UX recommendations for Merge Requests
A
Yes,
all
right
cheers
I'll,
send
you
the
the
link
for
the
mural
board,
the
chat
here
and
the
three
issues
you
had
already
brought
up
to
the
front
were,
let
me
see
download
artifacts,
let
me
see
which
one
that
is
download
artifacts,
showing
job.
A
A
All
right,
so
here
we
are
in
the
in
the
in
the
mural
board.
What
we've
done
so
far,
or
at
least
the
preparations
which
have
done
the
same
with
ci,
which
was
pretty
successful,
white
boarding
session
is
basically
we
place
these
on
here
and
we
review
each
one
of
them.
Give
little
stickers
like
hey.
Does
this
need
a
lot
of
design
work
or
just
a
small
amount?
This
is
the
validation
you
know
to
give
a
little
bit
extra
context
towards
the
you
know
the
feasibility
of
it.
A
However,
before
we
do
that,
I
thought
it
might
be
nice
for
you
to
place
the
issues
you
have
already
said
like
hey.
These
are
the
main
priority
items.
I
would
like
us
to
use
to
schedule
to
put
them
on
the
board,
and
you
know
explain
a
little
bit
as
to
how
you
got
to
those
conclusions.
B
So
the
first
one
you
have
show
warning
is
a
ci
issue:
it's
merged
trains.
It
should
move
to
ci.
A
All
right,
let's
I
was
wondering
because
I
saw
you
comment
that
somewhere
I
was
like
where,
like
in
the
table
that
I
created
and
put
in
all
the
issues,
I
didn't
see
any
mislabeled
ones,
but
this
is
then
that
issue
in
that
case
merge
trains.
A
B
That
gets
rid
of
the
first
one,
exactly
okay,
so
the
next,
I
think
I
put
it
on.
A
B
B
B
B
But
review
apps
in
terms
of
our
progressive
delivery
vision
is
the
lowest
cap
priority
category
at
the
moment,
because
it's
the
one
that
is
in
the
highest
maturity
and
we're
trying
to
get
the
others
there
too.
So
so.
B
A
Leave
I'll
leave
it
in
the
middle.
In
that
case,
in
terms
of
feasibility,
I
think
this
is
pretty
doable
right.
It
needs
some
back-end
involvement,
yeah.
A
A
A
Yeah
this
is,
this
is
a
badly
written
issue
and
it's
very
opinionated
about
its
solution
without
describing
the
problem,
I
would
say
it
is,
though
I
put
it
in
the
table,
just
as
it
was
related
towards
merch
quest
and,
like
hey,
wanted
to
get
your
opinion
on
like
how
much
of
an
you
know
over
me.
Do
you
suggest
this?
This
is
like.
I
personally
would
put
this.
A
A
A
A
Right,
I'll
put
it
even
even
below
just
it's
good
to
have
it
on
the
on
the
view.
Let
me
see
next,
one
cancel
message
for
add
to
merge.
Another
merge
train
feature,
and
this
one
is
just.
B
It
used
to
be
a
scope
label,
but
I
guess
we
need
to
delete
it.
A
All
right,
this
one
can
move
it's
not
a
next
one
make
review
web
visible,
even
when
it's
expired.
This
is
pretty
interesting.
I
think.
B
I
don't
think
it's
that
important
in
terms
it
definitely
is
not
one
of
the
top
three,
because
you
can
always
redeploy
your
pipeline
and
get
a
review
up
again.
So.
A
Yeah
I
personally
personally
like
from
my
my
like
my
personal
perspective.
I
would
not
always
say
like
that
is
the
only
like.
That's
one
side
of
the
problem
space.
The
other
side
of
the
problem
space
is
like.
Did
this
pipeline?
Have
a
review
app
at
all
or
not
like?
Is
there
something
to
review
here
in
a
review
app,
or
does
this
pipeline
not
create
a
review
app
at
all
like
there's,
there's
no
trace
of
it
being
being
there
so
to
say.
B
A
To
the
logs,
like,
I
think,
if
we're
gonna
make
review
apps
available,
for
example,
community
members
to
be
able
to
click
in
and
play
around,
you
know
those
kind
of
things,
then,
for
those
less
involved,
I
mean
this
is
from
like
community
contribution
perspective
right,
open
source
user.
They
will
not
immediately
go
towards
any
logs,
like
they
just
say
like
hey,
is
there
something
or
is
there
something?
A
A
B
I
don't
think
I
fully
understand
the
use
case,
dimitri
first
of
all,
we
did
add
in
release
12
6
or
7
an
option
to
know
where
something
was
deployed,
so
that
includes
the
which
environment
was
deployed
to
so
that
includes
the
review
apps.
So
we
should
have
that
data
in
the
mr
itself.
A
Sorry,
sorry,
let
me
see
so
you
say
that
if
the
merge
quest
deploys
to
an
environment
that
data
that
the
that
it
has
deployed
in
the
past
is
somewhere
available
within
the
merch
quest
view
for.
A
Because
that
is
exactly
what
this
does
right,
like
hey.
If
it
has
been
deployed
to
a
review,
app
environment,
then,
let's,
let's
give
that
information
towards
the
user.
B
B
B
Here
I'm
sending
it
by
the
chat.
B
Wait
I
sent
you
the
mr,
let
me
send
you
the
issue
you
can
see
in
the
issue.
There's
a
there's,
a
screenshot
like
a
mock.
A
B
A
A
B
A
cute
idea:
it's
not
very
high
in
importance,
but
I
think
it's
valuable
information.
A
So
where
would
you
place
it.
B
B
Yeah
this
one,
I
really
like
hey,
because
I
opened
it.
No
I'm
just
kidding
the
idea
here
is
we
want
to
make
a
mobile
development
easier?
It's
not
on
our
2020
plans.
A
B
Probably
something
we
will
tackle
next
year
and
the
idea
is
that
we
could
add
a
download
artifacts
button,
which
I
put
here,
merge
request
itself,
so
that
people
have
an
easier
time
downloading
the
source
code,
because
when
you
test
a
mobile
application,
basically
you
need
to
download
the
apk
over
and
over
and
over
right,
and
it's
really
hard
to
find-
and
this
will
just
make
it
easier.
A
Sounds
good
yeah
it
needs
a
little
design
work.
I
would
say.
A
B
A
A
The
review
app
has,
of
course,
so
here
in
this
case
right
we're
looking
at
somebody's
like.
We
want
to
see
if
this
had
a
review
app,
because
that
is
clearly
where
we're
stating
but
there's
no
way
of
us,
knowing
that
there
was
a
review
app
in
this
merch
quest.
That
is
kind
of
what
the
other
issue
is
pointing
at
in
terms
of
like
trying
to
solve.
For
this
use
case.
B
Yeah
well,
the
other
issue
was
only
added
like
in
12,
six
or
seven.
So
this
is
older.
A
A
A
Inside
artifacts
yeah-
and
they
are
so
we
kind
of
validated
these
are
indeed
the
most
important
ones
and
high
on
feasibility.
So
I
would
say
this
is
kind
of
like
a
success
in
that
sense,
in
terms
of
like
the
like
ultimate
deliverable,
we
want
to
see
from
the
ux
perspective,
for
these
issues
like
similar
to
james
here.
A
So
with
that
in
mind,
do
you
think
we
can
put
this
in
anywhere
in
the
upcoming
three
milestones
somewhere.
B
So
I
don't
want
to
put
the
the
most
important
one
is
related
to
mobile
deployment,
as
I
mentioned,
which
isn't
on
the
radar
for
this
year,
so
I
don't
really
want
to
do
it.
I
think
it
will
defocus
the
team.
A
B
B
A
B
Probably
needs
back-end,
I
mean
we
probably
have
the
api
somewhere.
I
don't
know.
Do
we
have
a
mock-up
for
this.
B
But
definitely
not
in
the
immediate
future,
probably
q3
and
onward.
A
All
right,
let
me
see
so
and
for
let
me
see
this
needs.
Do
you
think
this
would
be
an
like
more
of
an
onboarding
issue
as
well,
or
you
say,
like.
B
B
Because
you
need
to
get
the
data
from
the
back
end,
so
it's
not
front
end
only.
I.
B
B
A
A
A
A
A
B
So
that's
why
I'm
saying
q3,
because
we
are
focused
now
around
advanced
deployments
and
and
the
post
monitoring
issue
and
getting
feature
flags
out
so
so
review
apps
is
off
context.
The
first
one
that
I
think
we
would
probably
do
is
the
bug
the
p2
bug,
because
we're
also
focused
on
getting
rid
of
them,
so
that
would
be
higher
than
any
p3
bug
that
we
have,
regardless
of
the
category.
B
A
That
sounds
good
only
front
end.
Excellent
that
might
be
possible
just
gonna,
be
cute.
A
Boarding
issue
no
on-boarding
issue
due
to
back
involvement,
most
likely
not
currently
in
line
with
stage
focus.
Do
you
think
there
might
be
opportunity
to
get
the
same
q3
or
not
at
all
the
last
one
shown
job
which
does
deployment
inside
merchandise,
widget.
A
Might
be
all
right,
thank
you
so
much
then
this
is
this,
is
you
know
documented,
and
then
we
can
do
something
with
that
data
and
move
forward.
A
A
Yeah
there
were
a
lot
more
issues
and
tao
had
to
go
to
another
meeting
in
the
end,
and
then
I
went
with
fitika.
We
took
our
time
as
well.
You
know
to
get
a
little
bit
of
more
of
an
insight
into
you
know
why
this
is
an
issue
or
why
not
and
how
it
relates
to
current
ui
and
those
kind
of
things.
So
it
was
a
fun
fun
experience
as
well
and
exercise
to
do
anyway.
Thank
you
for
your
time
and
then
I'll.
Let
you
go
and
then
we
speak.
I
think
later
today.