►
From YouTube: 2021 06 28 APAC Sharding Group Sync
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
B
I
don't
think
that's
a
huge
issue,
but
it
means
that
if
you
have
anything
specifically
for
me,
then
just
put
it
in
async
in
the
same
way
that
craig
does
yeah
so
just
a
heads
up,
then
I
gather
from
reading
the
sharding
channel
and
some
of
the
notes
that
there
will
be
a
meeting
today
with
craig
chun
marin
and
brent
on
the
potential
involvement
of
sres
and
how
that's
going
to
look
like
that's
kind
of
all.
B
All
I
know
at
that
point.
I
think
this
is
going
to
be
a
discussion
on
opportunity
costs
when
to
involve
whom
and
and
how
much,
which
I
think
spiraled
from
the
discussion
on
accelerating
timelines
yeah
just
for
highlighting
and
transparency.
I
am
not
going
to
be
in
that
meeting.
As
far
as
I
know,
and
I
wanted
to
share
that
yeah.
That's
me
tom.
A
A
The
basic
concept
is
that
this
is
only
different
tests,
so
I
don't
think
it
matters
too
much
but
yeah.
So
if
dylan
doesn't
feel
too
strongly
about
it,
then
I
think
we
I'm
a
fan
of
the
current
approach,
I'm
very
biased
as
well
so
yeah.
A
We
can
always
change
it
as
well.
Right,
yes,.
C
The
problem
is
that
we
keep
the
same
scheme
on
like
we're.
Gonna
have
harder
time
to
discover
joints
as
part
of
spikes,
so
this
is
like
one
of
my
bias
why
we
should
keep
with
the
current
approach
that
we
actually
move
and
actually,
unless
you
had
the
comment
that
as
part
of
the
test,
we
can
also
drop
all
the
ci
tables
from
the
mic
to
ensure
that
we
don't
do
cross
joints.
C
So,
like
the
current
approach,
just
makes
a
little
less
work
to
do.
There
is
still
like
the
question
of
how
we
validate
that,
but
we're
gonna
have
to
solve
so
many
problems
still,
but
I
don't
think
that
this
is
really
like
important.
What
approach
we
pick
at
this
moment,
because
it's
still
gonna
evolve
once.
D
Maybe
we
should
ask
for
andreas
his
final
opinion
and
move
forward.
Let's
not
block
this
for
a
fourth
month.
If
everyone
agrees.
C
I
I
have
this
proposition,
I'm
just
gonna
like
wait
for
andreas
to
like
respond
today
through
day.
If
it
didn't
happen,
I'm
just
gonna
click
a
merge
on
it
and
resolve
it
as
a
follow-up.
I
think
right
now
it's
blocking
us
like
with
the
for
their
changes
and
like
we.
B
Cool,
I
think,
that's
that
I
think
everybody
is
now
actually
using
the
the
build
board.
So
that's
great
thank
you
for
doing
that.
I
think
my
my
only
question
is:
is
there
a
use
for
us
quickly
going
through
it,
but
it
feels
like
everybody
is
up
to
date
on
what
everybody
is
doing
anyhow,
so
I
don't
want
to
waste
time
on
it,
but
I
wanted
to
at
least
put
it
in.
B
B
No
okay,
then,
let's
not
waste
time.
Is
it
still
the
case
that
you
know
everybody
has
enough
work
to
do
and
you're
moving
forward.