►
From YouTube: Support Release Review Party - 13.0
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
I'm,
just
waiting
for
Ariane
to
come
in
okay,
I
believe
we
now
have
everyone
ready.
So
shall
we
start
all
right
today
is
the
29th
of
May,
20
20,
and
our
release
review
today.
We'll
focus
on
30
now
believe
this
is
to
me
the
first
major
release
review
and
for
anyone
wondering
we
have
started
our
release
preview
party
with
12.2.
So
this
is
going
to
be
an
exciting
release,
as
we
now
have
an
improve
it.
Early
surveys,
giddily
cluster
and
auto
deployment
of
gitlab
to
AWS,
GCSE,
application,
security,
testing
improvements
and
so
on.
C
D
So
I'm
trying
not
to
talk
too
much
about
this,
but
I
just
trying
to
make
everyone
on
the
same
page
about
what
we
mean
by
major
release.
Again,
it's
not
so
much
about
feature
from
from
our
perspective.
Is
it
more
about
breaking
like
backward
incompatible
changes
I?
Think
waiting
is
gonna,
talk
more
about
the
definition
of
the
application
and
stuff
like
that.
So
so
that's
really
what
major
release
means
for
us.
D
D
D
This
was
not
a
thing
before
version
12
and
if
people
around
during
this
period,
there
are
a
number
of
upgrades
from
the
customer
when
they
skip
version
2.0,
and
there
are
some
issues
with
that.
So
does
anybody
know
that
we
actually
stop
people
upgrading
in
South
manage
if
they're
trying
to
go
from
twelve
point
ten
to
thirteen
point,
one
straight
away:
I
can't
remember
if
there
is
a.
E
D
So
yeah
I
probably
need
to
like
look
into
this
further
myself,
but
I
guess
the
point
was
when
we
replaced
4.0,
we
the
release.
No,
it's
saying
that
you
should
go
to
a
point:
zero
first,
but
obviously
customer
probably
missed
that,
so
they
upgrade
straight
away
from
from
eleven
point
eleven
to
twelve
point
two
three
or
something,
and
there
is
something
that's
breaking
on
the
back
end
I'm,
hoping
that
by
now
we
actually
have
something
in
omnibus
that
stops
us
from
doing
that.
D
D
D
D
It
should
be
the
case,
then,
okay,
so
that's
another
thing
that
what
it
means
for
us
in
support
specifically-
and
if
you
want
to
like
read
background
discussion
about
inter
release,
you
can
go
to
that
there's
a
lot
of
discussion
and
the
executive
level,
but
why
are
we
doing
this
and
things
like
that?
So
yeah?
That's,
that's
all
I
wanna
talk
about
any
notes
questions.
Otherwise
we
can
the
one.
D
We
just
basically
tell
them
so
I
think
when,
when
the
definition,
if
we
don't
provide
them,
support
it's
more
about,
if
they
have
a
bug
and
they're
like
hey,
this
does
not
work
and
I'm
running
ten
point.
Something
then
we'll
say:
actually
we
don't
support
them
anymore.
Please
upgrade
to
later
version.
This
is
the
upgrade
path
going
upgrade
and
then
we
can
take
a
look
into
your
problem.
D
So
too,
but
again
it's
a
case-by-case
basis.
Right
I
mean
there
was
some
tickets,
where
the
customer
is
trying
to
upgrade
from
version
8.
For
example,
right
you
even
click
months
ago
version
8
is
like
so
old
already
and
there's
some
there
facing
so
many
issues.
Maybe
what
we
can
told
them
like
look
the
export
the
project
and
then
import
it
to
like
a
new
version
of
give
up.
So
there
are
again
it's
a
case
of
Cape
Isis,
anything
so
yeah.
That's
another
example
that
I
remember
good
question.
B
B
The
CI
only
an
exact
syntax
was
a
candidate
for
the
application,
but
you
know
we
didn't
actually
save
on
staff
occator
or
when
you'll
be
removed
I'm.
So
there
was
a
number
of
user
confusion
and
we
did
receive
a
number
of
tickets
as
well
where
people
are
like
yeah.
You
know
if
this
is
being
deprecated.
B
I
need
to
change
everything
to
the
new
rule,
syntax,
but
at
the
same
time
the
roof
syntax
doesn't
cover
all
the
different
use
cases
that
only
an
accepted,
so
the
product
team
went
and
I
she
looked
at
it,
and
then
they
discovered
that
yeah
that
shouldn't
be
in
the
documentation
at
all,
because
it
isn't
actually
deprecated.
We
shouldn't
say
that
we
are
pretty
deprecating
something
so
at
the
same
time
for
support,
because
we
use
the
dog
so
much
I.
B
G
B
D
B
Yeah
I
mean,
if
you
have
time
at
the
end
of
this
I
mean
we
can
have
that
discussion.
You
might
be
useful,
but
yeah,
moving
on
I've
selected
three
applications
which
have
near-term.
Why
impact
meaning
that
we'll
probably
get
customer
tickets
on
these
items?
So
the
first
is
that
unique
on
is
deprecated
and
Puma
is
now
that
if
our
app
server
for
new
installations
I
believe
for
existing
installations,
nothing
will
change.
B
But
yes,
the
biggest
one
is
that
Pumas
maximum
request?
Duration
is
set
at
60
seconds
and
is
not
configurable.
So
this
has
implications
for
longer
running
requests.
We
often
troubleshoot
issues
where
some
customers
need
to
increase
the
unique
on
worker
timeout,
because
typically
they
have
dependent
get
any
requests
that
take
much
longer
than
the
default
60
seconds
to
complete
so
donee
work
around.
This
is
to
revert
to
unicorn
and
wheel
as
I.
He
created
a
issue
for
this
over
here
and
we
were
actually
done.
B
The
video
was
true
of
Puma
time
now
and
what
Puma
does
in
treads
as
opposed
to
what
in
Econ
does,
which
is
spawning
additional
worker
worker
trends,
so
this
would
be
removed
in
a
year
in
jail
at
14,
I
mean
Union
unicorn
over
remove
at
14
right
yeah,
unique,
only
removing
deal
at
14
yeah,
so
I'll
go
through
all
these,
and
then
we
can
have
questions
at
the
end.
I
think
that'd
be
easier.
So
the
other
thing
the
next
thing
is
legacy.
Storage
for
projects
is
deprecated.
B
We
have
actually
moved
to
using
hash
storage
by
default
for
a
very
long
time,
I
think
for
a
little
year
now,
but
previously
administrators,
you
had
an
option
to
keep
projects
on
legacy
storage,
but
now
that
has
been
removed
and
I
think
the
key
thing
for
us
is
that
in
13.2,
all
projects
to
in
legacy
story
should
be
automatically
migrated.
A
background
migration
I'm,
not
sure
what
the
mechanism
for
this
is,
but
I
predict.
B
This
appear
potential
ticket
generator,
especially
for
you
know,
customers
who
are
upgrading
from
old
versions
like
11
or
yeah
stuff,
like
that.
So
for
those
who
don't
know
legacy
storage
is
basically
the
path
to
reposition.
This
basically
reflects
the
project's
restful,
hash
storage.
We
actually
store
them
using
a
hash
of
the
project
ID,
so
this
actually
makes
things
much
easier
to
manage
from
application
perspective.
B
We
know
no
longer
need
to
synchronize
the
file
system
with
database
changes,
and
it
prevents
problems
that
you
know
if
you
create
a
new
project
with
the
same
path
as
a
previous.
The
later
project,
if
you
had
legacy
storage
that
might
have
created
some
issues.
So
again,
this
would
be
legacy.
Story
should
be
finally
removed
in
Yale
at
14
in
a
year
in
the
last.
B
The
first
move
is
in
thirteen
point
two,
so
I'm
not
sure
what
mechanism
there
would
be,
but
I
think
it's
probably
just
background
migration,
which
is
actually
basically
just
I,
mean
despite
the
name
background
migration.
It
really
is
just
a
psychic
job
that
stuff
in
the
background,
so
I'm
not
sure
what
the
exact
mechanism
is,
but
I
mean
if,
if
they
are
detect
that
fall,
Commission
issues,
yeah
they're
very
well
projects
disappear,
and
then
we
have
to
troubleshoot
those
yeah.
B
An
FS,
it's
deprecated,
everything
you'll,
get
questions
about
this
because
many
of
our
customers
do
you.
Do
you
use
NFS,
so
I'll
cover
the
reasons
for
deprecation
first,
so
the
reason
why
it's
been
deprecated,
because
NFS
has
been
known
to
cause
data
loss,
especially
when
there's
high
right
pressure
from
multiple
clients.
So
realistically
this
would
mean
you
are
running
multiple
attorney
servers
and
you're
sharing
the
file
system
across
them
using
an
NFS.
B
Apparently,
the
reason
for
this
is
because
NFS,
even
in
the
best-case
scenario,
is
eventually
consistent,
not
immediately
consistent.
So
you
can
iron
results
where
you
actually
push
it
commits,
and
then
the
repository
actually
thinks
that
yes
still
hit
instead
of
the
current
hit.
So
basically
you
get
your
kid.
History
is
actually
overwritten
unintentionally,
so
the
replacement
for
highly
available
environments,
you
insure
planning
to
run
multiple
attorney
service,
is
actually
keeping
it
cluster,
formerly
known
as
little
eh-eh,
so
support
for
NFS
we
finally
removed
in
Gaelic
14.
B
However,
it's
unclear
please
remove
us
or
effect
non-ag
environment.
So
a
lot
of
our
customers,
basic
use,
mount
get
storage,
Shasta
NFS
mount
and
they
do
this
I
guess
for
durability.
Reason
so
that
they
can
actually
let
the
VM
be
responsible.
So
I'm
not
sure
if
this
section
affects
that
kind
of
use
case.
So
I
will
follow
up
on
this
one
yeah.
So
that's
it
for
my
selected
applications.
Any
questions
on
any
of
these
I.
D
D
If
you
go
scroll
down
a
little
bit
way
on
the
notes
that
I
wrote,
I
highlight
it
done
right,
so
one
other
thing
that
I
was
noting
is
that
if
you
go
to
prefect
support
at
the
document
there,
it
still
mentioned
that
prefect
is
experimental
at
this
time
and
we
use
prefect
for
so
I
believe
that
prefect.
This
is
like
a
built-in.
D
B
Okay,
so
in
this
case,
what
we
are
doing
is
that
we
are
announcing
the
NFS
is
deprecated,
meaning
that
we
will
rewrite
it
in
the
future.
So
the
reason
we
are
announcing
it
now
and
then
basically
actually
removing
it
onion
for
dinner,
so
that
users
and
our
customers,
who
have
a
year
to
sort
of
plan
Mike.
B
D
D
B
B
G
B
But
yeah,
if
you,
if
you
suppose
it
I
mean
even
if
we
moved
to
remover
in
14
I
mean
if
customers
are
still
on
12
or
13
I
mean
it
still
sort
of
in
support.
Tell
me
you
still
have
to
support
that.
I
mean
it's
a
bit
confusing
I!
Guess
by
that
design
is
there's
a
difference
between
product
remover
and
support
remover
right.
A
Is
basically
letting
all
of
our
customers
know
get
ready?
You
have
a
year
to
prepare
for
this.
Some
customers
will
have
a
change
management
cycle
that
could
be
multiple
months,
so
they
may
need
to
schedule
something
six
months
ahead
of
time
before
they
can
do
any
work,
so
this
is
making
sure
we're
giving
customers
as
much
notice
as
we
can
give
them
of
this
is
this?
A
Is
the
change
we're
going
to
be
removing
support
for
innovation,
have
a
year
to
get
your
environments
ready
for
it
and
for
those
customers
that
do
require
some
kind
of
replacement?
This
is
what
it's
going
to
be
start
playing
with.
It's
not
production
ready
yet,
but
you
can
start
to
understand
how
this
needs
to
be
incorporated
into
your
future
architecture.
A
So,
yes,
we're
still
supporting
it,
especially
if
customers
are
an
older
version
of
gitlab
like
yes,
we're
still
going
to
be
seeing
tickets
about
this
also
important
to
note,
even
though
it
is
going
to
be
fully
deprecated
in
14,
because
we
support
up
to
two
major
versions
back,
we
are
going
to
be
seen
tickets
and
we
will
be
seeing
issues
with
NFS
for
at
least
a
couple
of
years
after
that,
so
this
doesn't
mean
that,
as
of
now
ignore
NFS,
this
just
means
hey.
Let
customers
know
this
is
something
that
they
need
to
prepare
for.
B
Prefect
Oh
talk
a
bit
about
it
as
well.
So
basically,
beef
is
a
reverse
proxy
for
Kotori
and
why
it
does
is
that
erupts
it
routes
read
and
write
to
the
master
or
primary
replica
of
Kittery.
That's
actually
work
being
done
right
now
to
enable
reads
from
replicas,
but
not
right,
right
to
always
go
to
the
primary.
So
it's
a
bit
like
a
favor
over
plus
reverse
proxy.
B
At
the
same
time,
how
it
works
is
that
it
also
has
a
separate
Postgres
database,
which
it
uses
to
record
I,
believe
practical
information
and
other
things
like
that
and
somewhere
out
there
there's
an
issue
where
they're
actually
investigating
the
possibility
of
even
a
single
note
omnibus,
install
using
Prefect.
So
they
may
actually
implement
prefect
for
all
use
cases,
not
just
high
availability,
but
person.
G
B
B
We
do
so
the
current
the
current
issues,
with
integrating
it
with
omnibus
from
man
and
standing
is
that
we
Omnibus
currently
is
not
able
to
set
up
that
separate
prefect
tracking
database
for
Postgres
they're
working
on
it
right
now.
I
saw
an
issue
about
it,
but
yeah
yeah.
We
will
probably
look
at
normal.
H
Thinking
in
terms
of
like
overall
world
view,
if
we
have
like
I,
think
we
can
extract
the
list
of
customers
from
genders
who
have
asked
any
questions
about
NFS
and
we
can
start
sending
notification
that
ok,
if
you
are
thinking,
then
we
can
plan
something
out.
So
that
would
be
that
would
make
our
life
much
more
easier,
because
this
is
this
might
get
skipped
from
the
eyes
of
the
customer
that
ok,
the
you
are
using,
that
we
are
in
the
process
of
deprecating,
get
an
H
NFS
in
in
the
future.
So
maybe.
A
Probably
something
that's
more
per
custom
success,
though,
because
they
are
the
ones
that
ultimately
have
that
relationship
have
a
think
through
the
best
way
of
doing
it.
Like
I,
like
the
idea
of
an
issue
and
then
publicizing
the
issue
as
a
heads
up,
I,
don't
know
if
that's
the
best
way
it
appeals
to
me,
but
maybe
that's
something
that
we
can
talk
about
offline
Ariane's.
D
Can
actually
add
something
to
that
we,
the
customer,
should
receive
a
weekly
or
monthly
newsletter
so
like
as
usual
they're
like
hey
new
version,
hey
something
happened
with
youth
level
or
whatever
it.
So
maybe
there's
something
there.
That's
already
this
part
of
the
system
that
we're
doing
but
yeah
I
like
the
product,
if
necessary,
on.
C
C
All
right,
I'm
going
to
touch
base
again
on
the
tip
equation
that
Wei
Ming
has
inform
us
earlier
so
from
a
github.com
service
perspective
there,
where
there's
a
lot
of
tickets
that
we
have
received,
that
involves
CI
CD.
So
one
of
the
widely
used
practice
now
is
the
deployment
of
pipeline
using
only
an
accept.
So,
as
you
all
initially
know,
only
an
accept
was
initially
planned
for
the
creation
and
format.
What
format
from
what
I
understand?
Is
that
the
the
docks
we
have
here
on?
C
Only
an
except
didn't
have
this
note
previously,
so
a
lot
of
the
customers
will
actually
confuse
of
this
notice
because
it
was
previously
set
as
they're
going
to
the
brand
deprecated
and
it
was
not
set
as
a
option
that
they
prefer
rules
from
a
product
perspective.
So
what
happened
was
that
customers
on
get
lab
comm
migrated
right
away
to
rules,
and
you
know
try
to
explore
and
discover
options
on
how
to
how
to
apply
it
to
through
their
the
project.
C
Saint
Rose,
it's
not
fully,
let's
say,
mature
or
develop
some
of
the
like
logics
that
they
wanted
to
implement.
It's
not
available.
So
much
of
the
customers
are
still
relying
on
only
an
excel.
So
one
of
the
key
factor
that
I'd
like
to
highlight
here
is
that
the
use
of
only
an
accept
is
only
applicable
to
both
routes
and
only
accept
if
you
are
using
a
custom,
get
lab
CI
ml
file.
C
C
Now
you
will
see
a
good
website
configuration
invalid,
which,
which
contains
that
the
it's?
It's
only
accepting
only
if
you
see
that
so
there's
a
lot
of
pipeline
test
has
been
broken,
which
I
have
seen
in
get
Lancome.
That
is
not
that
is
no
longer
working
because
they
have
combined
only
and
except
together
with
the
rules
when
so,
when
they're,
using
the
template
obsess
here
or
any
other
auto
the
auto
depth
APNIC
template,
they
shouldn't
include
the
only
tags.
Okay,
so
that's
the
only
thing
that
I
wanted
to
emphasize.
D
D
D
C
C
D
So
that
there
was,
there
was
actually
what
I
was
about
to
say.
It
is
I
need
to
look
into
this
further.
Maybe
something
changed
what
recently,
but
my
understanding
previously
was
only
an
accept
and
rules
are
mutually
exclusive,
so
you
so
the
customer
can
only
do
one
or
the
other.
Maybe
there's
something
different
now,
but
yet
this
pretty
sorry.
C
D
I
think
I
think
that's
that's
the
thing
like
so
the
yeah.
The
story
is
that
if,
if
there's
a
Auto
DevOps
right
back,
then
when
they
want
to
configure
all
the
DevOps
the
customize
of
the
DevOps,
then
they
use
only
and
accept
syntax
to
do
something.
But
now
the
template
is
using
rules.
So
they
have
these
rules
to
customize
and
that's
how
it
break
a
lot
of
the
customer
stuff.
Isn't
it
yeah.
C
And
from
one
of
the
issues
that
I've
read,
I
think
one
way
or
the
other
in
the
future,
this
will
be
fully
duplicated
and
rules
is
the
only
you
know,
syntax
that
will
be
used.
So
only
a
next
step
will
be
it's
like
a
slow
transition
to
advise
customers
in
a
sense
that
if
you
ever
come
into
a
tickets
such
as
like
this,
you
know
it's
best
to
also
advise
them
kind
of
like
that,
we're
going
to
deprecated
in
the
beecher.
We
were
just
preparing
rules
over
now.
C
C
So
in
a
sense
of
you
know,
if
you're
not
really
familiar
with
your
vanity,
it's
one
of
the
things
that
we
can
focus
on
as
well,
and
the
next
one
is
the
added
admin
personation
events
I
have
tested
this
on
get
comm
from
the
feature
itself.
It
says
that
this
should
appear
in
the
admin
logging
under
audit
events,
but
it
appears
that
after
I
impersonated
an
account,
it
does
not
appear
to
show
in
the
public
project
level
settings
on
github.com.
C
Yet
so
for
now,
there's
nothing
to
you
know
be
worried
about
of
impersonating
accounts,
because
this
is
what
get
that
becomes.
What
engineers
usually
does
they
kind
of
like
personal
accounts,
to
replicate
what
the
customer
is
facing.
So
are
you
trying
to
look
into
this
and
if
you
look
into
the
issue,
it
says
that
it's
a
lot
more
complicated
on
the
compliance
side
or
get
lab
comm.
Since
it's
as
admin
who's,
you
know
everyone
will
be
I,
guess
I'm,
you
know,
there's
no
specific
facility
on
the
way
this
logging
is
set.
C
It's
like
it's
only
showing
us
impersonated
by
an
administrator
and
it's
not
specific
to
the
user
yet
whose
specific
administered
so
I
think
that's
the
part
where
this
is
not
being
compliant
yet.
So
this
is
something
to
watch
one
and
for
the
next
feature
that
I'd
like
to
highlight.
Is
the
group
level
push
rules,
so
this
was
just
recently
deployed,
I
think
very
fresh
just
yesterday.
So
if
you're
looking
for
the
push
rules,
it's
actually
showing
on
a
subgroup
group
menu
here,
I.
C
Have
not
seen
much
tickets
really
related
to
push
rules
yet,
but
I
will
think
and
imagine
that
there
are
a
lot
of
projects
that
are
being
set
already
with
the
push
rules.
So
if
one
of
the
customers
are
asking
why
the
push
rules
on
the
group
level
is
not
working,
this
is
because
of
the
project
level
report
repository
push
rules
here,
so
if
they
have
a
push
rules
on
a
project
level,
it
actually
overrides
the
group
push
rules
from
my
understanding
of
the
DOS:
that's
how
they
do
it.
C
D
G
So
next
feature
is
the
version
snippet,
so
before
snippet
is
just
a
snippet
without
version
control.
This
will
allow.
When
you
create
a
snippet,
it
will
create
a
separate
or
repository
for
video
for
your
project
or
your
personal
snippet,
and
by
default
it
will
has
a
master
branch
where,
where
you
cannot
delete
or
make
new
branch.
So
if
I
go
to
use
the
pet
here,.
G
G
G
H
G
G
E
D
This
in
self-manage
perspective,
when
they
upgrade
to
13.10
there
will
be
a
background
migration
that
will
convert
all
the
snippets
into
a
version
snippets
and
there
is
associated
write
tasks
for
it.
So
just
bear
in
mind.
There
is
some
maintenance
tool
behind
it.
Then,
if
something
came
up,
I
I
doubt
there
will
have
much
tickets
about
this,
but
it's
good
to
know
anyway.
G
All
right
next
stop
exciting
duck
theme,
web
Heidi,
so
yeah
this
simply,
you
just
go
to
your
profile,
preference
and
check
the
top
seat,
and
this
is
how
it
will
look.
It
will
only
show
on
the
web
if
you
open
the
web
IDE
so
on
your
normal
lap.
Browsing
through
gitlab
you'll
see
the
normal
screen
so
yeah.
This
is
society.
It's
invite
me
to
use
my
ID
anymore.
D
I
can
I
say
a
fun
three
here
related
to
distorting.
If
you
see,
if
you
see
the
issue
and
look
at
the
one
that
voted
the
most,
it's
actually
deep,
left
dark
mode
so
like
the
whole,
get
lap
in
that
mode.
So
is
that
the
highest
folded
feature
that
was
asked
by
the
community
so
yeah
anyway,
yeah?
That
is
a
fun
trivia,
but
anyway,.
G
Next,
we
have
our
animal
cruelty,
4-inch
protection,
so
now
you
can
set
your
default
range
protection
like
fully
protect
developer.
Cannot
push
meant
maintainer
can
so
these
are
the
option
available,
but
after
testing
it
for
a
little
bit,
I
see
that
it
only
affect
like.
If
a
new
project
is
created
within
the
group,
it
will
not
overwrite
the
project
protected
branch,
so
that
is
quite
weird:
I'm,
not
sure
your
faith,
our
intended
behavior,
so
you'll
need
to
look
more
into
this.
D
Yeah
I
was
read
a
little
bit
not
about
this
group
level.
Sorry,
the
group
level
default
protection
branch.
It
sounds
like
a
pretty
simple
feature,
but
there
is
a
lot
of
complexity
in
terms
of
it
create
a
lot
of
weird
user
experience
when
a
customer
create
a
project-
and
this
is
kind
of
one
of
the
things
that
we're
trying
to
sort
of
fix
from
the
wider
experience
of
using.
D
So
we
do
get
a
lot
of
tickets,
not
a
lot
some
tickets
in
the
past
when
they
like,
hey
I,
create
a
project,
but
I
cannot
do
ABC
and
things
like
this
yeah.
That's
that's
kind
of
like
the
complexity
around
it.
So
it's
good
that
we
started
doing
this
because
it
may
get
it
give
me
system,
administration,
more
and
more
control,
but
at
the
same
time
it
is
actually
more
complex.
The
more
option
we
have
the
more
complicated
it
is,
but
yeah,
that's
just
a
little
notes
for
me
about
that
part.
D
H
Yes
ended
up
right,
Yes
No,
maybe
all
right
so
the
13-point.
Oh,
we
have
made
the
deployment
to
pcs
much
more
easier
earlier.
The
deployment
part
was
mainly
focused
on
GCP
and
Google
clusters,
but
the
13-point.
Oh,
we
have
made
auto,
deploy
easy
s
as
well.
Easy
s
is
in
plastic
container
services,
it's
a
basically
in
obvious
product.
H
If
you
look
at
here,
all
you
need
to
do
is
set
certain
variables
with
your
eks
cluster
and
you
should
be
good
to
go
of
it
using
the
deployment
part
or
the
auto
divorce
part
or
fit
lab.
What
I
felt
about
it
is.
There
is
some
information
missing
on
the
documentation
part
regarding
the
auto
layout
section.
So
whenever
user
comes
in
on
deploying
to
EWS,
he
usually
preferred
cloud
deployment
documentation,
but
it
doesn't
talk
much
about
how
auto
the
auto
devops
can
be
helpful
in
this
case.
G
H
D
Any
question
so
I
think
I,
don't
know
I,
don't
know,
however,
actually
past
this
part
this
year.
But
my
understanding
is
that
with
auto
deploy
to
ECS,
that
means
that
to
use
a
complete,
auto
DevOps
and
when
they
don't
need
to
attach
a
kubernetes
cluster
anymore.
So
that's
another
sort
of
extra.
If
my
understanding
is
correct,
so.
D
H
It
is
look
at
this
far
there.
They
mentioned
that
if
you
have
a
kubernetes
cluster
tied
to
your
project,
so
it
will
refer
kubernetes
deployment
rather
than
it'll,
be
right,
plumbing
right.
So
this
is
what
they
have
I
believe
that
says
that
this
is
the
coming
feature
that
you
can
select
which
cluster
you
want
to
deploy
your
app,
but
for
now
it
prefers
kubernetes
over
AWS
yeah.
D
I
guess
I
was
sort
of
mentioning
that.
Just
because
say,
I
would
like
to
use
auto
DevOps,
but
I
wouldn't
I
don't
want
to
use
kubernetes
back
then
then
it's
not
an
option.
Right
I
mean
you
still
can
do
the
testing
and
so
on,
but
I
can't
to
deployment
without
kubernetes.
Now
I
can
but
I
mean
the
options
are
limited
because
you
have
to
do
it
is
yes,
but
yeah.
D
D
E
H
Right
so
moving
to
next
now
we
have
their
application
firewall
as
I
am
integration,
so
SIEM
integration
is
nothing
but
security.
Any
information
event
management,
where
we
can
check
the
Application
Firewall
logs
directly
into
our
into
the
gate,
lab
instance,
or
we
can
say,
get
up.
We
can
configure
it.
So
this
is
another
step
towards
making
strong
word
different
stage.
So
this
is
pretty
cool
thing
we
internally
use
fluent,
be
that
can
use
the
open
source.
That's
an
open
source
app
through
which
represent
data
collection
and
basically,
that's
a
data
collector.
H
Next
deprecations,
we
have
removed
the
log
view,
admin
dashboard,
so
people
who
don't
have
the
access
to
the
console,
they
won't
be
able
to
see
any
logs.
So
first
they
need
to
check
their
the
Clapp
local
admin
to
get
the
logs
earlier.
We
have
the
option
to
just
go
to
the
dashboard
look
at
the
recent
logs,
but
now
we
have,
we
have
removed
it
completely.
I.
A
D
Oh
so
the
next
notes
that
I
have
here
again
this
is
like
my
usual
personal
note,
for
anyone
who
doesn't
understand
what
I'm
trying
to
do
here.
This
is
my
personal
note
that
I
write
for
myself
when
I'm,
going
through
the
release,
notes
and
I
put
it
here,
because
I'm
gonna
need
to
write
it
somewhere
anyway,
so
might
as
well
just
put
it
here
for
people
to
share
and
I'm
just
gonna
go
to
a
few
of
the
highlights.
So
I
highlighted
with
yellow
on
the
notes.
I'll
share
my
screen
quickly.
D
It
shouldn't
take
too
long,
Shawn,
so
I'm
hoping
I
can
finish
this.
You
see
my
suena
the
release,
notes.
Ok,
cool
I
shouldn't
take
too
long
because
there's
so
much
stock
in
here,
but
I
guess
the
like
it
once
the
interesting
point
get
lab
faster
ways
already
talked
about
it.
So
we'll
skip
that
part
this
one.
Thank
you
summary
of
terraform
plan.
I,
don't
know
if
people
notice
this
part
and
there's
a
lot
of
like
chatter,
about
this
on
the
Internet
I've.
D
Never
actually
I
haven't
actually
test
this
myself,
but
this
actually
create
a
bit
of
a
buzz
in
you
know
social,
media
and
stuff,
so
basically
yeah.
We
can
see
the
terraform
state
and
I'm
actually
kind
of
wondering
if
we
can
use
this
for
our
deaf
resources
or
even
the
interview
platform,
and
things
like
that.
D
The
settings
right,
so
the
unicorn
worker
killer
is
probably
the
most
widely
used
configuration
so
I'm
just
expecting
there's
something
around
this
ticket
wise
so
be
remember
about
this
and
also
Puma
with
NFS
back
storage
and
rub
enable
so
this
has
got
to
do
with
the
historical
performance
issue
in
NFS,
back
storage
and
apparently
Puma
with
multi-threading
processes
have
issues
with
this,
so
they
they
need
to
consider
running,
Puma
a
single
thread
and
they
run
Pumas
a
single
thread.
That's
kind
of
unicorn
anyway.
Right
so
anyway,
have
read
more
about
this.
D
D
Does
anyone
familiar
with
this
in
any
case,
so
yeah
boom
I
still
default?
As
you
know,
omnibus
normal
me,
bus,
the
chart
is
changed
from
unicorn
to
web
service,
so
it's
like
a
general
web
service
and
again
if
they
want
to
configure
Puma
and
unicorn
outside
the
default,
we
used
to
do
config
map
and
then
now
it's
been
removed
in
favor
environment
variables.
D
C
Curious
about
the
change
to
Puma,
because
previously
from
what
I've
seen
in
self-managed,
they
could
be
used
to
like
provide
recommended
server
configuration
with
the
change
to.
How
does
this
affect
customers?
Are
they
moving
more
into
more
like
lower
my
memory
kind
of
server
config,
and
do
you,
like
optimize
I,
mean
lower
than
the
configuration
requirement
for
gift
lab
and
so
forth?
I.
D
D
I,
don't
even
know
that
the
reference
architecture,
the
the
10
K
2
K
and
things
like
that
they
were
doing
performance,
testing
and
they've
done
that
in
the
past,
I,
don't
know
if
they're,
using
puma
or
unicorn
for
the
test
to
begin
with,
because
they're
doing
like
a
proof
right.
Okay,
this
is
a
10k
architecture,
and
this
10k
architecture
will
be
tested
with
the
script
that
like
generate
bunch
of
requests
and
so
on,
to
prove
that
it's
actually
able
to
handle
the
traffic
for
X
amount
of
users.
D
D
No,
it's
questions
comments.
We
can
talk
about
it
more
later
and
I'm
sure
we
gonna
talk
about
it
more
in
the
next
few
released
anyway.
Let's
move
on
yeah.
This
is
what
wrote
an
attention
about
group
level
and
yeah
I
was
giving
an
example
about
why
this
is
this
weird
ux
complexity.
You
can
have
a
chat
about
this
with
me
at
some
point.
D
New
comparison
mode
for
requests
again,
this
is
a
it
looks
like
a
little
change,
but
we
do
have
a
few
tickets
about
this
in
the
past.
This
has
got
to
do
with
the
way
we
handle
this
in
merge,
request
the
difference
between
triple
dot,
give
and
double
dot.
This
get.
This
have
a
lit,
have
read
more
about
this
lots
of
discussion,
details
and
so
on.
I
put
a
link
there
to
like
an
epic
yeah.
Just
keep
this
in
mind.
D
If
you
get
a
ticket
they're
asking
like
hey
I,
have
this
Mr
D
fees
we're
what's
going
on
this?
Probably
one
of
the
reason
what
it
does
now
the
customer
actually
have
an
option
to
to
give
weight
the
head
of
the
master
rather
than
the
branch
things
like
so
yeah.
Yeah
have
read
more
about
this.
Just
keep
that
in
mind
anyway.
If
you
want
to
see
your
merge
request,
that's
you're
eligible
for
Sean.
You
look
into
that
this
one
I,
don't
know
why
this
is
not
in
the
deprecation
of
don't
furnish.
D
D
So
this
is
talking
about
the
way
doctor
machine
work
is
that
it
triggers
an
api
to
a
cloud
provider
to
create
a
VM
and
it
will
be
generated
and
an
auto
scaling
manner.
So
if
you
don't
use
the
jobs,
then
it
wouldn't
create
the
machine,
but
they
also
have
this
concept
of
having
a
standby
machine
so
that
so
you
don't
have
to
wait
until
the
VM
is
created
to
trigger
a
job.
So
there
is
all
this
configuration
around
this
yeah
like
I,
said
this
is
completely
changed.
A
A
Would
people
prefer
to
not
have
another
session
and
just
catch
up
on
your
own
I'm,
going
to
say
if
you
want
to
have
another
session,
arranged,
give
it
a
thumbs
up
if
you
are
happy
with
where
we
are,
and
we
kind
of
leave
it
at
that,
do
nothing
give
it
say,
15
seconds,
so
that
everyone
has
a
chance
to
vote
and
has
a
chance
to
display
on
the
screens.
So
all
those
that
would
like
to
have
another
session
both
now
I.
D
A
Pretty
clear
that
people
are
kind
of
happy
with
where
we
are
so
I'm
gonna
jump
in.
Thank
you
very
much
everyone
for
your
time,
those
that
presented
thank
you
for
taking
the
time
to
put
your
thoughts
together,
definitely
worthwhile
reading
through
the
other
notes
that
are
on
the
dock.
If
you
have
any
questions,
probably
reach
out
to
Andrew,
because
I
think
all
of
them
are
going
to
be
Andrews,
the
female
wants
that
kind
of
hair
or
noodles
that
have
review
yourself
absolutely
go
for
it.
A
Do
that
if
people
have
any
ideas
of
should
we
change
the
release
review
parties
for
major
releases,
considering
the
next
one
is
only
a
year
away
like
I,
don't
think
it's
an
urgent
thing,
but
maybe
it's
something
we
can
think
about.
Maybe
it's
something
we
want
to
talk
about
next
month.
We
see
how
next
month's
minor
release
review
goes
so
again
thanks,
everyone
enjoy
your
respective
weekends
and
I
will
catch
up
with
everyone
at
some
point
next
week,.