►
From YouTube: Support Release Review Party - 12.4
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
B
B
Right
so
the
new
thing-
that's
added
was
that
so
this
is
the
kubernetes
manage
class
that,
if
I
bought
some
of
you
might
be
familiar
this.
If
you
click
on
to
one
of
these
squares,
which
represents
a
part,
you
can
see
locked
basically
so
what's
what's
different
in
Chopin,
for
is
they
added
this
drop
down
to
allow
you
to
switch
between
different
environments
that
you
might
have
on
your
cluster,
so
that
sense,
it
fits
that
for
this
new
feature,
it's
it's
very
simple.
Actually,
what's
more
interesting!
B
Yep,
sorry
is
in
the
EE
section,
because
this
is
a
premium
only
feature
so
inch
off
point
for
where
we
are
actually
displaying
the
locks
back
to
the
UI
is
actually
over
at
this
line
so
happens.
Is
we
actually
don't
take
into
account
the
fact
that
the
locks
might
sometimes
have
invalid
utf-8
byte
sequences?
So
what
happens?
Is
that?
B
B
B
Right
so
in
master
now,
instead,
we
just
return
the
entire
object.
So
it's
slightly
different
in
that
we
have
to
sort
of
go
into
result,
dot
lot
and
then
do
the
whole
mapping
and
stuff,
but
yeah
I
haven't
had
time
to
figure
this
one
out
so
that
patching
that
ticket
works,
but
only
for
chopping
for
Isis
by
inch
0.5.
You
no
longer
work
because
the
code
is
different,
so
yep,
that's
why
we
share
regarding
kubernetes
for
blocks
any
questions
here.
C
A
D
Was
just
I'm
just
trying
something
out,
so
that's
why
I'm
like
I,
don't
know
you're
gonna
like
it
or
not,
so
we'll
we'll
give
it
a
go,
because
I'm
not
actually
going
to
super
details
into
this
I'm,
just
trying
to
figure
out
like
out
of
how
many
people
on
this
call
right
now,
six
of
us
seven
of
us
how
many
actually
read
through
the
blog
post
like
raise
your
hand,
I.
D
B
D
D
Their
mark
and
depend
on
merge
request
from
the
same
project.
This
is
no
longer
cross
project
make
sense,
so
it's
kind
of
cool
but
yeah
I.
Guess
if
you
go
to
that
in
the
future,
so
there's
basically
to
release
that
have
cross-project
march
across
dependencies,
the
other
after
that
would
be
called
merge
request
dependencies
just
need
to
be
a
bit
aware
about
this.
Okay,
this
is
pretty
cool
code
owners,
approval.
D
D
D
D
Well,
there's
this
one,
so
I
don't
actually
get
like
this
is.
This
is
like
a
weird
part
that
I
found
when
I
go
to
the
document
3
in
detail,
so
this
is
12.3.
It
says
that
it
had
a
mr
approval,
but
per
branch.
It
should
go
through
these
features
on
the
available
to
api,
but,
as
you
can
see
earlier,
it's
not
actually
documented
than
the
api.
D
D
Is
actually
yeah,
it
is
kind
of
cool,
it's
a
conditioning
for
getting
attributes
to
a
job.
So
the
example
here
you
know
you
can
say
the
target.
The
target
branch
is
master,
then
this
particular
job
Clause
will
always
execute
and
something
else,
and
then
this
is
the
default.
So
it's
sort
of
like
if
else--if,
basically
as
what
they
going
for.
D
Yeah
they
just
adding
like
a
new
sort
of
conditioning
here.
The
problem
that
I
have
when
I
go
through
this
documentation
is
that
the
example
here
is
always
is
only
when
right,
just
trying
to
give
conditional
attributes
did
it
pop,
but
the
examples
on
it's
all.
Only
when
I
don't
know
you
can
actually
use
this
for
tags,
for
example,
allow
failure,
failure
and
things
like
that.
D
D
D
There
are
some
configuration
changes
that
you
need
to
do
so
you
need
to
custom,
get
clone
URL
and
stuff
like
this,
but
yeah.
This
is
I
didn't
realize
yours
in
the
case,
to
begin
with,
don't
play
too
much
with
Geo,
but
well
now
we
can
yeah.
That's
that
another
interesting
one
that
I
found
just
now
is
this.
This
is
a
large
file
handling
we
get
partial
clone.
D
D
Should
people
put
large
files
in
get
I,
don't
know
really
using
alphas
all
this
time,
but
yeah
I,
don't
know
where
this
is
going,
but
it's
kind
of
interesting
to
know
that
there's
this
option,
yeah
partial
clone,
what
else
yeah.
So
this
is
a
new
or
get
feature.
So
the
reason
why
I
said
alpha
is
also
because
it's
only
available
from
I
think
it
was
good
to
point
22.
D
D
And
I,
don't
think
that
had
noticed
from
the
release
was
about
productivity.
Analytics
I
don't
play
too
much
with
this
just
yet,
but
it
is
it's
like
a
new
product
like
we're,
trying
to
introduce
I
believe
so
it's
only
been
introduced
in
12.3,
not
exactly
sure
like
what
we
suppose
see.
There's
no
example
of
like
screen
at
all
in
here.
So
I
don't
know.
What's
up
with
that,
but
yeah
something
that
you're
a
bit
of
time
play
around
with
again.
This
seems
like
a
very
new
feature.
D
D
Yeah,
okay:
this
is
creating
a
group
runner
again.
This
is
more
for
my
amusement
because
I
didn't
mail
is.
This
feature
exists
the
beginning
with,
so
you
can
create
a
group
runner.
If
you
have
a
kubernetes
integration
back,
then
you
can
only
set
up
runner
like
shared
per
project.
Now
you
can
get
a
shared
runner
for
for
a
group.
D
D
D
D
Because
I
remember
like
a
few
months
ago,
there
was
some
chat
about
okay,
let's
do
the
like
this
project
and
then
you
know
every
week.
Every
month
you
have
like
our
progress
on
like
things
that
we're
working
on
in
support
I
mean
we
don't
have
that
much
project
to
the
point
that
you
need
to
do
a
bunch
of
move
things
around,
but
things
can
be
handy
so
and
I
just
pointed
out
there
and
when
I
see
this
is
like
okay.
D
D
So
this
is
like
a
new.
Basically
it's
a
new
stage
that
is
configured
by
default,
so
by
default
it
used
to
have
a
thing.
It
was
staged,
sorry,
test,
build,
deploy
or
something
I
think
it
was
the
the
initial
one
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
this
section
is
anyway,
so
we
have
like
a
new
stake.
If
you
want
to
call
it
the
pre-staged
and
the
post
stage,
so
this
will
always
be
available.
D
D
Does
that
make
sense
whatever
I'm
saying?
If
what
they're
trying
to
do
is
that
they
want
to
have
a
pre
and
post
stages
on
a
CI,
then
why
do
we
need
to
sort
of
explicitly
say
in
here?
I,
don't
get
it
and
also,
if
you
can
figure
it
out
of
order,
it
doesn't
matter
it
says
if
it,
if
it
did
find
an
order,
see
the
order
of
pre
and
post
cannot
be
changed.
Why
is
it
here?
D
Yeah,
so
this
is
there's
some
apps
that
has
been
upgraded
recently,
so
I'm
not
really
sure,
because
I
haven't
actually
play
much
with
the
kubernetes
installation
of
app
and
stuff.
But
it
says
here
that
the
nginx
interest
and
kubernetes
search
manager
has
been
upgraded,
but
the
funny
part
is
that
to
upgrade
it,
you
have
to
uninstall
and
reinstall.
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
B
Actually,
share
a
bit
more
like
on
the
new
tree
and
post
stages.
I
happened
to
work
on
something
on
a
ticket
that
sort
of
involved
that
recently,
okay
yep.
So
the
reason
why
we
added
this
pre
and
post
special
predefined
CI
stages
is
because,
if
you
are
aware,
we
do
have
a
configuration
in
our
Caleb
CI,
which
allows
you
to
include
other
key
lab
CI
files
into
a
single
configuration.
So
there
will
be
the
includes
key.
B
So
what
happens
is
that
some
some
users
have
tried
to
define
some
stages
in
the
base,
e
aĆ
configuration
and
then
try
to
include
a
file
which
also
defines
other
stages
in
the
included
file.
So
the
explanation
was
that
the
stages
from
the
base
file
and
the
stages
from
the
included
file
would
be
much
together
into
a
single
pipeline.
So
for
some
type
of
your
base,
tiles
like
ABC
and
you're,
included
far
as
a
stage
D.
The
expectation
would
be
that
the
combined
pattern
would
include
stages,
a
B,
C
and
G.
B
B
B
Everyone,
so
so
the
I
mean
the
long
story
shot.
The
workaround
they
came
up
with
is
to
predefined,
like
top
three
and
dot
PO
special
stage.
So
if
you
define
any
jobs
in
those
stages,
they
will
always
be
at
the
top
or
the
bottom
of
your
pot
instead
respectively.
So
that's
kind
of
like
a
imperfect
look
around
through
this
hole
and
surging
of
stages,
problem
actually.
C
B
B
C
B
D
D
We'll
see
how
it
goes,
but
yeah
I
find
this
pretty
confusing
when
I
read
through
it,
but
but
yeah
I
guess
at
the
same
time
this
is
it
says
it
equivalent.
Integration
I
understand
that,
but
then
I
guess
this
is
trying
to
be
clear
cool
thanks
for
the
context
of
that
way,
because
I
don't
really
know
why
they
have
this
and
having
that
as
a
context,
kinda
interesting
I
have
a
read
to
the
ticket.
D
Yeah
anybody
anybody
else
have
any
comments.
Do
you
find
that,
like
interesting
or
not
like
this
is
just
this?
Is
the
super
random,
because
this
is
just
like
when
I
go
through
that
page
when
I
go
to
that
blog?
Those
are
the
things
that
I
found
interesting,
so
yeah
I,
don't
know.
We
think
it's
a
good.
Is
that
bad.
A
It's
worthwhile
doing
doing
this
I,
like
the
idea
of
doing
like
hey
here's,
a
general
update
of
what's
happened,
and
then,
if
anyone
has
something
a
little
bit
more
meaty
to
dig
into
you
like,
like
remaindered
to
then
spend
some
time
to
really
go
into
it
and
show
some
living
examples
and
what
it
actually
looks
like
I
think
that's
super
super
useful.
But
that's
that's
just
me.
What
do
what
is
it
on
ask
them.
C
D
It's
kind
of
funny
because,
like
all
these
things,
as
I
mentioned,
it's
not
all
of
the
things
that
change
like
there's,
so
many
like
different
updates
and
I'm,
not
even
like
I,
don't
even
mention
some
of
them,
because
maybe
hey
I,
don't
really
know
what
the
update
is
all
about,
and
probably
some
of
the
thing
that
I
need
to
look
into
further.
But
yes,
cool,
yeah
I'll,
try
to
do
it
again
next
time
around
and
see
how
it
goes.
D
D
A
At
all,
Wei
Ming
Andrew.
Thank
you
both
very
very
much
for
the
time
that
you
put
into
giving
us
insights
deep,
dives
general
overviews,
all
that
good
stuff,
Bronson
I,
think
of
sharing
I'm
glad
to
see
that
as
a
new
person,
you
find
that
this
is
useful
and
helpful,
like
it's
good
to
know,
I
think
we're
gonna
keep
this
going.
This
is
the
second
one
we've
done.
It
seems
pretty
valuable,
so
I
think
we're
just.