►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
C
Yay,
can
you
guys
hear
me:
okay,
I,
think
you're
great,
look
at
Grace,
so
yeah
distraction,
I,
I,
gotta,
work
on
other
things,
close,
DMS
and
stuff
during
this
call,
but
other
than
that
I'm,
just
also
distracted
by
being
around
all
these
beautiful
people.
C
It's
really
fun
intentions,
yeah,
just
making
sure
everyone's
on
the
same
page
for
qf
push
cutting
scope
and
and
all
that
to
get
qf
out
before
the
Burning,
Man
Exodus
and
before
get
coin
comes
out
and
then
the
other
thing
it
was
yeah
working
group
proposals.
There's
some
oh
optimism,
just
like
you
know,
I
hope
we
can
give
like
a
couple
minutes
to
talk
about
optimism,
planning
and
and
just
make
sure
everyone's
in
the
same
on
the
same
page,
I'll
throw
it
over
to
Franco.
E
Can
you
hear
me
yeah
cool
intentions
for
the
calls
just
catching
up
with
all
the
working
group
proposals
and
yeah,
just
thinking
of
everyone
and
distractions
same
as
everybody
else?
This
is
crazy.
Man
like
this
is
like
another
dimension,
like
the
calls
happening
here.
I'll
pass
it
over
to
almond.
D
Thanks
Franco,
my
intention
is
to
listen
to
the
working
group
proposals
and
also
all
the
agenda
items
that
grief
mentioned
and
same
as
everyone
else
and
I'll
pass
it
to
Ashley.
F
B
B
Okay
I'm,
my
intention
for
the
call
is
just
to
answer
any
questions.
If
anybody
has
questions
about
working
group
proposals
and
to
find
out
about
other
stuff,
their
working
group
proposals,
my
distraction
is
just
trying
to
find
a
place
where
to
have
a
call
with
internet
and
I
will
pass
it
to
hi.
F
A
And
I
wish
I
was
with
you
and
could
fix
your
AV
problems.
Yeah
intention
is
to
get
updated.
District
is
I'm
recovering
from
like
a
cold.
B
F
D
F
Can
you
hear
me
yeah,
go
ahead.
C
F
F
Them
and
I
want
to
hear
you
guys
talk
about
them
and
my
distraction
is
freaking
fall
ball,
seeing
you
guys
over
there.
H
I
didn't
hi
Danny
hi,
everyone,
hey
yeah,
my
intentions
for
the
call
I
guess
are
to
go
over
my
working
group
proposals,
I,
put
up
qf
and
give
economy
on
Friday.
You
know
I
just
like
to
slide
in
right
before
deadlines
occur.
That's
my
that's
my
Approach
with
these
bureaucratic
things,
but
anyway,
I
just
want
to
answer
any
questions
about
that.
Go
through
the
other
ones
and
yeah.
My
distraction
is
looking
the
same
as
Ashley.
It's
like!
H
E
Didn't
go.
Thank
you
Lauren
same
as
the.
E
I
Great,
don't
forget
everybody
here,
I
think
so
so
we
can
start
going
through
some
stuff
here.
I
I
C
We
can
start
with
that
I
mean
I,
might
delegate
to
Lauren
just
to
give
everyone
an
update
on
the
qf
efforts,
but
first
I
can
talk
optimism.
The
main
thing
is
that
the
the
the
impact
Dow
grants
didn't
go
through
with
optimism.
C
So
if
there's
no
way
we're
doing
it,
so
that's
one
thing
off
our
plate
kind
of
nice
in
a
way
and-
and
but
we
do
have-
this
retro
pgf
is
still
going
and
the
red
the
Retro
pgf,
like
educational
plan
and
effort
at
this
conference
and
in
ACC
we're
going
to
do
we're
going
to
go
through
the
Retro
PDF
efforts,
whether
or
not
we
get
this
grants,
because
we
think
we
have
good
funding
opportunities
from
the
Retro
PDF
system
itself,
and
you
know
for
marketing
retro
pgf.
C
We
probably
will
get
a
good
some
good
funding
from
the
retropcs
system,
so
I
just
want
to
fill
out
that
that
is
being
done
in
give
its
name
and
so
the
co-branding
opportunity.
There
is
important
and
I
think
that
we
might
want
too
start
to
slowly
integrate
I
think
we
already
happened,
but
we're
integrating
Anna
Maria
into
the
comms
commute
team
and
I.
Don't
know
if
there's
any
other
Integrations
that
need
to
happen,
but
it'll
be
really
good
to
make
an
effort
that
and
then
I'll
just
go
through
the
other
projects.
C
So
praise
is
still
on
the
list
and
very
likely
to
to
get
funding.
If
that
happens,
there
will
be
some
development
demands
from
praise
to
do
attestations
and-
and
things
like
that,
so
there
may
be
some
extra
demands
from
the
give
it
Dev
team
for
praise.
Pairwise
is
another
one
like
the
Retro
PDF
that
we're
also
just
going
to
do
no
matter
what
so
we
and
there's
actually
pairwise
pairwise
yeah.
So
there's
a
hard
deadline
for
pairwise
and
all
of
these
things
by
September
20th.
C
So
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
Dev
demands
for
pairwise
once
the
designs
are
done,
The,
Trusted,
seat
and
score
I
think
the
region
score
for
the
most
part
can
be
done
with
external
deaths,
we'll
have
to
see
and
that
one's
so
far
it's
doing
really
well,
but
we'll
see
how
if
it
passes
and
then
there's
the
economic
co-design
for
of
gas
fees.
This
is
Mitch's
project
and
that
one
we
will
only
do
if
it
passes
same
with
regen
score
and
praise.
C
We'll
only
do
them
if
they
pass
the
the
proposals,
but
they
they
both.
They
all
will
demand
some
effort
from
us.
The
other
proposal
that
made
it
through
is
the
common
stack
proposal,
but
that
won't
have
any
impact
on
anything
that
we're
doing
in
Vietnam
so
but
yeah.
So
that's
I,
don't
know
if
there's
any
questions
or
updates-
or
you
know,
I
just
wanted
to
give
people
like
an
update
on
optimism,
because
it
is
a
major
funding
source
to
us.
Yeah.
F
So
is
it
related
to
this?
It's
not
related
to
this
topication,
so
we
shouldn't,
for
example,
stop
in
proposal
for
pairwise
or
other
projects,
or
it's
related.
No,
no.
It's.
C
F
Example,
if,
for
the
current
working
group,
for
example,
we
have
a
planning
for
development,
something
and,
for
example,
if
if
we
want
to
consider
these
projects,
you
know
we
can,
we
I
think
it's
directly
affects
the
timeline
of
the
current
working
group.
C
But
the
nice
thing
is:
these
are
all
relatively
well-paying
clients
like
we're
asking
for
a
lot
of
money
from
optimism
to
do
this
work.
So
it's
really
great,
and
not
only
are
we
asking
for
a
lot
of
money,
there's
a
huge
opportunity
that
all
these
projects,
the
business
case,
is
that
not
only
will
we
get
these
grants,
but
there's
a
good
chance
that
we
will
also
get
retroactive,
public
goods
funding
and
so
we'll
get
double
paid
for
these
projects,
which
is
really
helpful.
I
mean
it's.
C
But
I
guess
the
other
topic
is
quadratic
funding
which
it's
nice
all
these
projects
have
deadlines,
September
20th,
but
they
don't
really
start
for
another
week
and
a
half
because,
like
we're
they're
being
voted
on
right
now
by
the
op
Community,
but
quadratic
funding
has
a
tight
deadline.
So
during
this
Gap
time
we
can
push
that
out
in
I,
don't
know
Lauren
if
you
want
to
say
anything
else
of
things
that
you're
looking
at
for
qf.
H
Sure
yeah,
so
basically
we
talked.
This
is
kind
of
basically
coming
from
Griff,
saying
that,
essentially,
if
we
have
qf
out
in
time
for
ECC,
then
while
we're
at
the
conferences
and
even
during
East
Barcelona,
we
can
be
saying
that,
like
okay
qf
is
here
and
have
like
a
working
MVP.
H
H
We're
gonna
pick
like
25
to
50
projects
and
just
ask
them
to
do
an
update
so
that
they
know
they're
part
of
the
round
and
then
and
then
run
that
round.
So
I'm
working
together
with
Ashley
on
on
the
list
of
projects
and
just
pushing
hard
with
the
developers
and
Monique
to
try
to
get
qf
fully
tested
and
like
working
so
that
we
could
start
the
round
July
18th.
So
that's
two
weeks
from
tomorrow
that
we
would
like
start
round
so
yeah.
H
It
would
basically
like
it
kind
of
like
needs,
and
it
kind
of
needs,
support
from
from
a
lot
of
different
people
in
order
to
like
get
the
communications
out
to
get
emails
done
to
get
the
documentation
up
to
like
even
then
just
be
like
supporting
people
during
the
round
answering
questions
and
and
whatever
else
that
we
can
do
but
like
trying
to
just
kind
of
like
keep
a
relatively
minimal
scope.
Yeah
I'm
kind
of
running
around
just
looking
at
where
we're
at
from
development
right
now,
but
then
also
hope.
H
I
can
organize
some
testing
parties
this
week
and
probably
more
like
next
week,
when
East
Barcelona's
done
like
in
between
youth,
Barcelona
and
HCC,
to
empower
everybody
and
and
get
it
make
sure
that
everybody
understands
how
it's
working
and
the
different
like
nuances
of
giveth
qf
versus
other
qf
like
versus
like
Bitcoins
rounds.
But
yeah
Griff
is
Raising
trying
to
raise
a
matching
pool
of
ten
thousand
dollars
and
it
will
be
distributed.
Hopefully,
in
a
stable
token,
we
haven't
raised
the
funds
yep.
H
We
have
probably
like
3K
in
our
donation.eth
multisig,
but
need
to
raise
like
another
7K
to
distribute
to
projects
to
make
it
like
a
worthwhile
incentive.
So
it's
kind
of
like
okay.
We
can
get
all
these
things
done,
then
we'll
run
a
qf
round
on
July
18.
I
mean
if
we
don't.
If
we
don't
make
it
by
then
like
okay,
we
can
run
it
later,
but
the
the
it's.
H
The
real
idea
is
that
if
we
push
it
out
by
July
18th
while
we're
at
the
conference,
we
can
be
like
encouraging
people
to
participate
in
it
and
also
we'll
have
like
functional
qf,
which
will
then
be
a
lot
more
make
it
a
lot
easier
for
us
to
fundraise
for
later
qf
rounds.
If
we
don't
run
it
in
July,
it
won't
happen
basically
until
September,
because
get
coins
gonna
run
around
in
August
and
then
they're
going
to
be
a
Griff
and
I
will
be
at
Burning.
H
Man
and
it'll
be
tough
to
run
qf
if
I'm
not
around
at
all.
So,
instead
of
pushing
all
this
to
the
very
end
of
the
year,
we're
going
to
try
to
like
minimize
it
and
get
it
out
the
door
and
like
run
it
with
our
top
active
projects
to
weeks
from
now
so
yeah
I
I
also
put
the
working
group
proposal
up
in
the
Forum
so
yeah
anyway.
H
C
Think
the
big,
the
other,
the
other
challenges
will
be.
You
know
like
working.
C
H
Yeah,
but
we
are
going
to
be
reaching
out
to
projects
like
now
being
like
Hey,
we're
hoping
to
launch
this
round.
Will
you
add
an
update?
Are
you
going
to
be
in
on
this
and
like
basically
are
just
trying
to
come
up
with
like
Ashley
and
I
want
to
want
to
have
projects,
add
an
update,
but
if
we
can't
get
at
least
25
projects
making
an
update
before
then
then
we're
gonna
have
to
like
come
up
with
another
means.
Maybe
reply
to
this
email
with
yes
or
something
like
that.
You
know.
I
Okay,
well
sounds
like
a
lot
of
stuff.
It's
like
okay,
we're
gonna,
need
all
these
Dev
resources
sometime
in
the
next
10
days,
for
all
these
optimism
missions
and
then
like
basically
right
on
the
heels
of
that
are
also
in
between
that.
We
have
to
prioritize
qf.
I
H
H
F
I
Okay,
well
I
hope
it
works
some
stuff
here
to
look
at
we'll
mention
this
I'm.
Assuming
this
is
good.
We
could
jump
into
some
stuff
to
vote
on
Lauren's
thumbs
up.
Okay,
we're
doing
it
some
stuff
in
this
snapshot.
Here
we've
got
two
proposals:
two
working
group
proposals
and
we'll
see
if
the
giveth
house
internet
loads
for
us
communitas
working
group
proposal.
I
I
F
F
I
This
is
here
it's
in
this
line
here,
three
months.
F
I
I
think
my
thing
is
like,
if
we
kind
of
said
in
our
our
sinks,
we
had
like
maybe
a
couple
months
ago
that
we
need
to
focus
on
improving
our
our
community
building
and
our
Communications
then
I'm
like
then.
We
should
prioritize
this
with.
You
know
going
big
on
the
scope.
If
we're
going
to
reduce
the
scope
in
other
places
and
give
it
so
I
voted
grow
and
that
was
kind
of
my
reasoning
behind
it.
It's
like.
Well,
then,
let's
actually
grow
Community
Building.
I
B
A
lot
of
like
community
members
are,
in
the
ambassador
program,
brought
to
light
that
most
people
are
very
blocked
by
just
getting
into
our
Discord.
So
it's
like,
we
can
make
the
telegram
group
be
more
of
this,
like
more
Community
kind
of
group,
and
then
our
Discord
can
become
more
simple
and
be
more
just
for,
like
team
stuff.
I
I
Great
Oh
I
thought
you
had
something.
C
E
I
Great,
so
just
remember:
there's
three
days
left
to
vote
on
this.
So
take
some
time
and
do
it
again,
it's
a
tight
race
sustain
and
grow
anybody
could
win,
but
with
that
I
want
to
move
on
to
the
other
proposal,
which
is
up
for
voting
I,
just
stuck
it
up
there
this
morning.
This
is
the
Dow
Ops
working
group
proposal.
I
You
guys
are
familiar
with
the
drill
here,
grow
sustained
shrink
and
no,
please
don't
vote,
no
one.
My
proposal
I'll
be
heartbroken.
I
can't
take
it
twice.
This
is
the
Dao
Ops
one.
It's
been
up
for
almost
two
weeks,
but
I
know
everyone
starts
looking
at
it
when
the
vote
actually
goes
up
so
Elaine's
like
yes.
That's
me
this
is
the
five
main
goals
that
we
talked
about.
So
this
is
the
short
and
long
term
I'm
not
going
to
give
you
the
full
thing,
but
the
high
level.
I
We
also
talked
about
it
last
week,
HR
conflict
resolution,
maintaining
a
healthy
work
environment,
building
opportunities
for
us
to
connect
as
co-workers
and
also
you
know
all
the
usual
stuff
that
we
have.
I
The
second
thing
is:
maintaining
highly
effective
and
engaging
voting
processes,
so
making
sure
that,
like
the
tools
that
we
use
to
vote
are
like
novel
or
interesting
and
are
actually
like
effectively
providing
people
or
voters
to
impact
the
organization
and
that
they're
actually
voting
and
stuff
the
third
one
is
efficiently
managing
the
Dallas
treasury,
that's
stuff
that
we
already
do
kind
of
on
a
twice
a
year
basis.
You
know
the
money
that
we're
getting
from
these
grants.
I
If
we're
getting
yield
off
of
it,
you
know
making
sure
that
we
have
some
sort
of
plan
to
pay
our
bills
or
at
least
reimburse
somebody
who
does
payer
bills,
and
this
one
here
is
interesting
because
fundraising
since
most
of
it's
done
through
General
magic,
we're
kind
of
going
to
be
billing.
These
costs
to
Dell
Ops.
I
I
You
know
this
is
what
we're
gonna
spend,
forgive
contributors
working
and
fundraising,
what
we're
going
to
spend
for
GM
contributors
doing
fundraising,
forgiveth,
and
this
is
how
much
revenue
we
can
estimate
based
on
on
the
numbers
that
I
have
right
now,
which
gives
us
a
monthly
net
cost
of
a
little
under
four
thousand
and
then
a
total
fundraising
cost
for
season.
One,
which
is
three
months
of
11
11
500.,.
I
So
maybe
that
looks
a
little
bit
better
than
than
the
first
draft
here,
which
is
just
like
I
think
we
were
billing,
a
flat
9,
000,
monthly
or
basically
yeah,
almost
twenty
seven
thousand
when
realistically
based
on
our
expected
Revenue,
it's
going
to
be
somewhere
closer
to
eleven
thousand,
but
we
haven't
made
that
money.
Yet
so
I'm,
like
you,
know,
we'll
see
how.
C
I
For
fundraising,
yes,
I
just
don't
know
how
to
cut
scope
on
fundraising.
You
know,
but
basically
everything
else
like
contributor
costs
basically
will
go
up
or
down
based
on
what
we
vote
on
so.
C
I
The
third
thing
I
want
to
touch
on
which
is
kind
of
cool
and
and
Franco
mentioned
it
as
well,
is
providing
governance
advisory
as
a
service.
So
all
of
these
really
great
skills
we
built
from
Dowing
for
the
last
seven
years,
maybe
sometime
next
year,
we
could
think
about
offering
that
as
a
for-profit
service
to
other
dows,
you
know
things
like
facilitating
governance,
how
we
do
our
governance
meetings.
I
You
know
how
we
manage
our
Forum
building
voting
systems,
our
buddy
system,
teaching
people
how
to
do
conflict
resolution
and
even
best
practices
for
treasury
management.
I
These
are
some
long-term
ideas,
but
I
think
it's
fun
and
you
can
see
the
team
here
myself,
Rachelle
Nico,
Heather,
Nicola,
Kai,
Amin
Griff.
A
few
of
these
are
just
like
advisory
rules.
I
And
yeah
I
feel
like
I've
talked
a
lot,
but
I
want
to
hear
if
there's
any
comments
or
questions.
I
A
Yeah
it
takes
too
long.
You
know
like
it's
just
I
think
this
could
be
hacked
together
fairly
quickly.
I
feel
like
what
the
time
it
takes
for
this
to
pass.
It's
just
you
know,
holding
it
up
a
bit
but
yeah,
and
this
is
just
a
very
preliminary
scope
and
you
know
once
it's
approved
or
not.
We
can
iterate
on
that.
It
would
be
great
to
have
some
insight
actually
get
some
insight
from
people.
What
would
be
decide
functionality,
and
if
this
scope
is
actually
good,
I
never
received
any
feedback.
I
I
F
I
F
If
there's
no
comments,
yes,
go
ahead.
Sorry,
just
a
comment:
that's
I
mean
usually
help
on
hiring
sometimes
me
and
you
might
consider
that.
I
Yeah
so
we'll
still
we'll
still
do
hiring
for
the
Dow,
like
with
Heather
and
all
that.
Well,
so
then,
just
a
reminder.
This
is
going
to
be
up
until
the
10th
of
July
to
be
voted
on
just
went
up
this
morning,
so
you
get
a
full
week
and
with
that
there
was
nothing
else
to
be
voted
on.
E
Not
really
are
we
I
will
be
posting
the
snapshot
like
later
this
week.
Probably
this
has
been
up
for
seven
days.
If
you
want
to
give
some
feedback
there,
you're
welcome
to
the
benefit
back
and
yeah.
E
Let's
take
a
look
at
it
and
let
us
know
if
everything's
clear
over
there,
oh
yeah,
actually
yeah
no
I
have
two
posts,
like
some
numbers,
that's
why
you
said
yeah
so
I'll
be
posting
this
the
give
that
we're
using
for
distribution,
which
I
actually
am
still
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
get
those
numbers,
but
I'll,
give
it
a
little
bit
unique,
probably
and
also
today
or
whenever
I
can
cool.
E
I
It's
fun:
okay,
any
questions
or
comments.
Rewards
working
group.
E
Yeah
I
only
put
two
options
and
I
think
I
said
this.
The
last
Dublin
it's
called
I,
don't
think
we
can
like
cut
anything
in
the
shrink
version
because
like
and
then
what
I
said
is
like
the
sustain
option
for
us
is
like
actually
like
a
grow
option.
So
I
think
like
realistically
would
like
I,
don't
know,
I
think
I'm
going
to
vote
for
that,
because
I
don't
think
we're
at
a
point
where
we
should
be
prone
as
a
working
group.
E
There's
a
lot
of
things
that
we
still
need
to
figure
out,
but
the
main
like
differences,
I
guess,
is
yeah
quantification
reviews,
which
is
something
that
we
started
doing
it.
But
then
we
didn't
continue,
because
we
didn't
have
a
lot
of
response
in
that
and
yeah.
Basically
given
a
more
focus
on
giving
like
analytics
and
reports
on
the
on
the
Forum.
That's
like
the
the
growth
part,
but
yeah.
E
B
C
The
differences,
maybe
besides,
of
somewhat
tangential,
but
how?
When
will
we
actually
be
caught
up
to
the
current
to.
C
E
I
Definitely
yeah
it's
unfortunate.
We
had
the
that
Karma
dashboard
that
we
paid
for
I,
remember
and
it's
it's
set
up
and
we
could
even
use
that
data
to
like
integrate
with
the
reward
system.
Okay,
but
the
problem
is:
is
that
since
praise
is
not
maintaining
that
distribution
tool
anymore,
we
we're
not
able
to
like
plug
it
in
yeah,
I.
I
So
it's
not
like
a
tool
that
we
can
just
use
to
plug
in
with
other
reward
systems
and
produce
like
one,
because
the
original
one
could
work
with
Source
cred
and
that's
what
we
did,
but
Source
cred
was
no
longer
maintained
and
Karma
does
basically
that
and
more
what
Source
Credit
could
do.
Yeah
and
there's
a
team
actually
maintaining
it,
but
because
this
distribution
tool
is
not
being
maintained
anymore
or
even
worked
on.
C
I
I
I
E
F
H
Quadratic
funding
is
a
product
where
matching
funds
are
distributed
to
projects
according
to
the
number
of
donors
or
favoring
the
number
of
donors
over
the
amount
donated
per
individual
donor.
So
it's
a
democratic
way
of
Distributing
funds
and
give
us
as
integrating
quadratic
funding,
because
it's
proven
to
be
very
effective
in
onboarding
new
donors
and
new
projects
into
the
platform
and
also
large
donors,
because
there's
like
a
big
matching
pool
that
large
donors
can
donate
to
this
is
kind
of
like.
H
But
they
don't
need
to
decide
exactly
the
nitty-gritty
of
like
where
it
goes
to
to
different
projects.
It's
like
more
comforting
to
large
donors
to
donate
a
large
sum
to
a
matching
pool
that
gets
distributed
according
to
community
preference,
instead
of
in
having
to
donate
to
just
like
one
project
or
another
project
or
whatever.
So
it's
like
proven
by
Bitcoin
to
be
a
really
effective
way
of
onboarding
new
contributors
and
distributing
funds
in
large
quantities
and
just
having
large
large
amounts
of
funding
flowing
through
the
platform.
H
So
giveth
is
basically
like
occupying
a
new
market
Gap
because
since
scale
get
coin
is
really
prioritizing
decentralization
and
building
the
aloe
protocol,
which
is
all
based
off
of
smart
contracts
for
distribution
and
everything
giveth.
It
can
like
prioritize
user
experience.
Essentially,
so
we
are
like
most
of
the
way
already
through
developing
this
application,
and
so
the
quadratic
funding
working
group
is
around.
Building
delivering
and
executing
the
quadratic
funding
product,
so
I
mean
I
can
talk
more
about
kind
of
like
the
pros.
H
Do
the
features,
but
Mitch
is
scrolling
down
so
I'm
assuming
he
wants
to
just
stick
up.
G
G
H
Is
gonna
be
like
kind
of
old
school
get
coin
style,
centralized
distribution
of
funds
via
a
multi-sig
and
we're
tracking
the
donations
in
our
database?
There's
no
cart
features,
so
you
donate
to
individual
projects.
Also,
donors
get
give
backs.
Also
give
power
is
like
is
responsible
for
curating
like
the
Sorting
of
projects
on
the
qf
page.
H
So
it's
basically
like
qf
with
an
easy
user
experience
where
you
can
donate
on
any
of
these
five
chains,
whichever
one
you
prefer
and
then
we
like
track
those
donations
and
just
do
it
like
easy
peasy
and
send
the
matching
funds
so
yeah,
easy
user
experience
good
way
of
getting
donors
on
to
giveth,
also
a
good
way
of
attracting
more
projects
like
quality
projects
on
to
giveth,
because
and
and
getting
them
to
become
verified.
H
So
those
are
kind
of
like
our
kpiser
and
I
didn't
write
them
in
the
in
the
post.
As
like
explicit
I'm,
looking
at
Ashley,
she
did
a
nice
job
of
her
her
post,
but
the
the
like
kpis
are
essentially
like
number
of
new
donors.
Number
of
new
verified
projects
amount
of
funds
donated
to
projects
that
amount
of
funds
raised
in
the
matching
pool,
and
those
are
things
that
we
can
kind
of
like
track
and
observe.
H
But
the
scope
of
work
for
for
this
working
group
proposal
is
essentially
like
build
the
product
launch
the
product.
So
there's
not
like
a
huge
amount
of
funding.
Difference
between
sustain
and
shrink
the
biggest
difference
between
grow
and
sustain
is
adding.
This
give
staking
feature
so
give
staking
or
giveth.
H
Pro
is
an
idea
that
Mitch
came
up
with
that,
essentially
like
you
can
stake,
give
on
your
project
or
anyone
can
State
give
on
any
price
project
in
order
to
like
upgrade
that
project
and
get
them
access
to
cool
stuff
and,
like
the
main
cool
stuff,
we're
thinking
of
is
like
eligibility
in
qf
rounds.
So
basically,
someone
would
need
to
stay.
Give
on
a
project
in
order
for
that
project
to
be
part
of
a
qf
round,
and
then
that
like
give
stake,
would
be
locked
up
during
the
round
and
like
could
be
slashed.
H
If
the
project
is
fine
found
to
be
like
engaging
in
like
civil
organization
to
to,
like
you
know,
basically
steal
matching
funds,
so
the
biggest
difference
between
grow,
sustain
and
Shrink
is
that
grow
includes
developing,
designing
and
implementing.
Give
staking.
H
There's
like
a
bunch
of
extra
budget
for
that,
because
it
includes
a
bunch
of
contributors
and
tossing
Marco
Mo
me
Mitch
I
mean
we
all
need
to
fight
about
the
details
of
this
and
make
sure
that
it
works
and
goes,
and
that's
not
done
yet
so
I
included
that
as
kind
of
like
the
main
big
difference
and
then
the
difference
between
sustain
and
Shrink
is
like,
oh
is,
is
essentially
onboarding,
like
onboarding
documentation,
a
lot
of
the
marketing
side
of
things
that
we
would
need
to
do
like.
H
We
won't
be
onboarding
projects
of
staking
if
we
don't
build,
staking
and
also
onboarding
project
to
optimism.
Mitch
asks
the
question
about
like
optimism:
what's
this
have
to
do
with
anything?
Basically,
we
were
discussing
Distributing
the
funds
to
projects
only
if
they
have
an
optimism
address
and
kind
of
like
using
our
qf
rounds
as
a
way
to
make
giveth
in
the
future.
More
eligible
for
retroactive,
public
goods
funding
optimism
is
giving
out
like
a
lot
of
money
and,
like
part
of
their
like
retro
pgf
stuff,
is
like
growth
stuff.
H
It's
like
things
that,
like
onward
more
people
to
the
optimism
ecosystem,
I
can't
remember
the
details
of
it,
but
I
read
the
great
doc
prepared
by
Anna
Maria,
and
that
was
one
of
them.
So
it's
like
getting
more
people
using
the
optimism
network.
If
we
basically
say
like
you
can
only
be
part
of
qf
rounds.
H
If
you
have
an
optimism
address
and
we
support
our
our
projects
and
getting
that
optimism
address,
then
we
can
distribute
matching
funds
on
optimism
and
later
be
more
eligible
for
more
retropcs,
which
has
been
really
useful
so
far
in
sustaining
the
get
with
Community.
From
a
funding
perspective,
the
only
other
detail,
I
guess
that's
important
to
mention-
is
the
Civil
analysis
stuff,
which
is
being
which
we're
planning
on
Outsourcing
like
after
we
run
our
qf
rounds,
we're
going
to
have
like
a
list
of
data
collected
from
our
database.
H
So
it's
like
these
are
all
the
donations
or
these
are
all.
The
donor
addresses
we're
going
to
give
them
to
trustalabs,
which
is
like
this
like
a
I
platform
where
they
can
basically
run
queries
and
like
determine
if
a
donor
address
is
like
suspected,
Sybil
or
not
suspected
civil.
H
So
we
can
use
that
basically
just
to
eliminate
the
addresses
that
are
civil
and
we
agreed
to
them
basically
to
give
them
five
percent
of
our
matching
pool
amount
for
whatever
into
the
future
qf
rounds,
and
so
five
percent
of
ten
thousand
dollars
is
one
thousand
dollars
or
or
no
it's
500,
and
then
five
percent
of
25k,
which
is
our
original
thought
for
the
matching
pool,
would
be
like
12.50
and
that's
what
I
used
as
the
estimation
in
the
working
group
proposal,
so
that,
like
that
percentage,
is
actually
coming
out
of
the
matching
pool
funds
that
we
raised
and
I
think
I
put
a
note
there
in
it,
but
yeah
relevant
to
know.
C
H
The
other
option
they
had
was
basically
charging
per
query
it
and
it's
like
they
have
to
query
each
address
on
each
blockchain.
So
it's
like
it
ends
up
like
okay,
I,
don't
know,
then
it
adds
up
and
it
becomes
very,
very
variable.
If
we're
likely
to
have
a
civil
attack,
there
would
be
a
lot
more
queries
to
run.
You
know
versus
if
we
didn't
have
any
civil
attacks
there
wouldn't
be
too
many,
and
so
we
wouldn't
really
need
them,
and
then
it
wouldn't.
H
C
Know
yeah:
the
idea
was
to
make
them
a
partner
and
have
aligned
incentives,
as
opposed
to.
Basically
we
get
a
better
deal
if
there's
civil
attacks,
you
know
otherwise,
in
this
way
it's
like
no
we're
just
Partners.
They
want
us
to
raise
more
money
in
the
matching
pool,
and
you
know
yeah.
F
I
Yeah
Peak
cool
awesome.
Awesome,
let's
see
here
yeah
just
my
comment
here
is
breaking
down
the
cost.
If
there's
any
software
or
anything
that
you
need,
but
I
saw
your
response.
There
yeah.
H
I,
don't
know
we're
just
using
the
link,
thinks
we
already
have
I,
don't
understand
a
lot
of
the
interesting
things
that
Kai
knows
about
our
subscriptions
and
this
crazy
devops
world,
but
I
mean
I
could
work
with
him
to
put
a
budget
in
there.
But
I'm
not
really
sure.
It's
very
relevant
to
this
particular
working
group
proposal
and
I
think
it's
better
included
in
give
economy
and
and
in
the
DAP.
F
A
Even
though
you
might
think
there's
like
no
requirement
I
think
we
should,
in
all
these,
like
proposals
check
out
all
the
to
check
in
with
all
the
chapters,
because
they
probably
need
it,
and
it's
I
think
it's
a
good
good
thing
to
just
have
a
talk
and
if
there's
no
need,
there's
no
need,
but
at
least
sub
graphs
I
think
will
be
required
for
this.
I
Cool
so
I
guess
we'll
we'll
let
this
up
for
probably
sometime
early
next
week.
Maybe
this
goes
to
a
vote,
but
cool
and
the
last
one
I
want
to
spend
time
on.
H
Yeah,
well,
we
have
eight
minutes
left
in
the
call.
Do
I
have
like
five
minutes
to
talk
about
this,
sir.
H
Okay,
all
right
give
economy
working
group
proposal.
Does
things
like
give
backs,
give
power,
give
stream
give
Farm
region
farms
and
mostly
maintenance,
but
also
building
things
as
they
come
up
like
we
promised
optimism
from
the
fundraising
side
that
we
would
add,
give
backs
to
optimism.
We
would
add,
give
power
to
optimism
so
then
that
work
kind
of
trickles
down
into
the
give
economy
working
group-
and
we
kind
of
like
add
those
extra
chains
or
you
know,
shape-shift
assets
if
we
can
extend
the
the
regen
farm
for
them,
and
so
it's
like.
H
H
Are
that
there's
not
a
lot
of
like
extra
stuff
that
we
need
to
currently
be
building
to
onto
this,
except
for
like
if
new
stuff
comes
up
and
somebody
asks
it
of
us,
you
know
I
feel
like
I,
don't
really
have
control
over
this
working
group
and
it's
scope
of
work
because
they're
just
trickle-down
things
that
come
from
other
places,
so
it
was
kind
of
like
hard
to
put
in
the
in
the
proposal
and
that's
kind
of
how
I
put
it
together.
H
I'm,
like
you,
know,
I'm
Lauren
I'm
at
your
service
I
do
the
things
you
ask
me
to
do
and
I
both
mostly
don't
complain,
but
sometimes
I
do
so
anyway.
The
things
I
put
in
like
the
oh
yeah,
and
also
this
is
kind
of
like
open
for
debate
and
maybe
I
shouldn't
put
it
in
here.
I
included
project
review,
listing
on
listing
and
verification,
just
because
I
was
thinking
like
well.
H
That
leads
to
give
backs,
you
know,
and
that
leads
to
give
power
and
then,
like
projects,
don't
get
give
backs
if
whatever
and
then,
when
we
send
out
these
emails
regarding
the
verification
and
stuff
like
that,
they're
related
to
give
backs
a
lot.
So
I
included
it
in
here.
But
you
know
both
Monique
and
Mitch
kind
of
had
this
question
of
like
hey.
H
Why
is
that
there
and
I
can
totally
take
it
out
and
eliminate
that
from
the
budget,
and
we
add
it
in
the
dapps
working
group,
but
I
just
made
that
call
based
on
also
not
seeing
it
anywhere
else
up
in
the
Forum,
but
the
other
things
that
you
know
the
working
group
does,
that
I
think
are
definitely
included.
Are
calculating
Distributing,
give
backs
like
the
fraud
review,
eliminating
eliminating
like
the
questionable
donations
from
it
and
nice
tokens
maintain
and
give
power
staking
rewards
like
oop
when
they
ran
out.
H
H
Then
you
know
user
support
really
to
give
economy,
and
then
this
the
the
get
the
give
backs
and
give
power
on
optimism,
is
kind
of
like
where
the
majority
of
the
budget
for
this
I
think
is
going
to
a
lot
of
the
parts
of
you
know
they
give
economy.
Working
group
are
kind
of
just
like
Trucking,
along
well-oiled
machine
like
I.
Don't
even
talk
to
people,
you
know,
but
adding
give
backs
and
give
power
into
optimism
requires
testing
requires
development
requires.
H
Smart
contracts
requires
review,
we're
asking
even
like
sem
to
review
the
contracts
even
outside
of
give
us.
So
that
is
where
the
majority
of
the
budget
went
but
yeah
and
then
other
than
that
I
just
included
things
related
to
social
media,
tweeting
campaigns
around
give
power
and
like
and
then
I
just
I
was
thinking
like
okay
stretch
goals.
What
could
we
do
to
grow?
H
I
included
the
referral
program
as
part
of
this,
just
because
I
think
that
it's
because
it
has
to
do
with
give
backs
and
the
give
token
a
lot
that
it
could
be
covered
within
this
scope,
but
in
the
referral
program
currently
doesn't
have
a
way
for
the
person
who's,
referring
to
see
how
many
people
click
their
links
and
how
much
money
they
made
off
of
the
referral
program
and
like
even
how
much
give
and
so
I
and
like
that's
not
like,
we
haven't
released.
H
Yet
we
just
released
the
referral
program,
new
updates
and
we
haven't
really
like
scoped,
that
out
and
like
made
a
priority
so
like
we
could
vote
on
this
proposal
to
grow
it
and
then
include
improving
the
referral
program
to
add
those
features,
as
part
of
that
otherwise
sustain
is
like
basically
just
like
keep
doing
things
that
we're
doing
give
backs,
give
power.
All
of
it
still
goes
out.
H
We
keep
talking
about
these
things
and
telling
people
about
it,
but
we
don't
improve
the
referral
program
and
then
also
like
you
know,
we
don't
do
things
that
people
ask
us
to
do.
You
know
this
is
kind
of
like
where
I'm
like
nah
I,
don't
know.
You
know,
I
just
allocated
some
extra
developer
hours
for,
like
the
inevitable
fundraising,
said,
jump
but
like
if
we're
just
gonna
say
fundraising
can
never
say
JUMP.
H
Unless
we
do
this
whole
thing
and
do
Forum
post
proposals,
then
you
know
that's
in
sustain,
we
can
never
jump
and
then
shrink
I,
don't
remember
what
I
even
put
on
shrink.
What
I
took
out?
Oh
yeah
I
took
out
a
lot
of
marketing
stuff
because
I'm
not
even
sure
that
this
is
valuable.
H
Tweeting
about,
like
the
give
backs,
are
out
like
even
like
updating
like
you
know
letting
people
know
when
projects
are
like
create,
updates
and
all
these
different
things
like
they
would
be
cool
things
to
do,
but,
like
yeah,
we
need
to
allocate
kind
of
budging
budget
to
the
comms
chapters
to
improve
our
emails
and
to
improve
our
little
bit
of
social
media
in
order
to
like
continue
marketing
these
products.
So
shrinking
is
basically
cutting
the
marketing
budget
around
give
economy,
also
no
jumping
when
people
say
jump
and
also
no
referral
program.
I
The
for
this
Calm
stuff
is
this
kind
of
stuff
that
you,
where
did
these
ideas
come
from
I'm
just
curious?
Well,.
H
They're
already,
basically
being
done
like
I've,
been
doing
them
and
Steve
like
I,
write,
I've,
been
writing
regular,
give
backs
or
out
tweets
every
two
weeks.
Four
years
now.
A
H
H
Does
this
something
that
responsible
for
the
you
know,
stays
in
the
comms
working
group
and
same
with,
like
you
know,
Steve's
like
hey,
we
should
make
a
campaign
about
give
power
and
try
to
get
people
to
understand
it
like
we
could
choose
not
to
spend
any
comms
marketing
Budget
on
talking
about
give
power,
yeah,
otherwise,
I
think
you
know,
that's
how
you
know
if
comms
is
not
its
own
working
group
doesn't
have
its
own
budget,
then.
I
H
Who
knows
the
give
backs
are
give
backs,
are
out
tweets
I
think
are
like
relatively
minor,
but
like
campaigns
around
I
give
power
and
give
back
I
basically
allocated
some
time
for
Steve
and
for
almond
in
grow
and
sustain
and
I
cut
that
out
under
shrink.
So,
like
you
know,
it's
just
very
fun.
It's
not
like
saying
specifically,
they
are
doing
exactly
this
one
type
of
tweet.
You.
I
Know,
yeah
gotcha,
gotcha,
okay,
cool
cool
and
you
I
mean
you
responded
to
all
this
stuff
here,
but
it
would
be
just
figuring
out
your
your
software
and
subscription
costs
because
there's
probably
a
lot
of
them
and
I
can't
I'm.
Looking
at
the
screen
sideways.
If
I
can
like
read
it
here
right,
yours
do
you
explain
it
with
the
building
products
plan
and
yeah
I
I'm
of
the
opinion
that
it
should
take
the
scope
out
of
here
and
put
it
into
the
DAP
for
managing
project
statuses.
H
Sure
that's
fine
I
can
take
it
out.
Yeah
then.
Actually,
the
last
thing,
your
last
comment
was
about
give
allocations.
I
think
I,
don't
know,
honestly,
I
think
that
this
should
be
its
own
thing,
these
these
incentive
requests
and
like,
if
we're
ever
going
to
continue
give
backs.
We
run
out
of
the
pre-allocated,
give
for
it
like.
We
should
discuss
that
and,
like
you
know
more
at
length
than
than
you
know,
including
it
together
with
contributor
hours
and
things
like
this,
it
just
I
mean.
I
H
I
Well,
I
think
the
point
is
like
that
we
do
some
planning
in
advance
and
then
it's
like
when
you
have
to
decide
how
much
you're
gonna
put
in
the
rewards,
like
you,
don't
have
to
ask
the
whole
Dow.
You
already
have
like
a
because
if
you're
gonna
ask
the
whole
Dow
like
what
do
you
think
of
this,
you
know
bi-weekly
distribution
of
give
tokens.
I
I
think
the
interesting
thing
is
to
see
how
much
we're
spending
in
in
like
dollars
and
also
a
gift
because,
like
Franco,
needs,
give
tokens
for
the
praise.
Distribution,
rewards
and
communitas
needs
it
for
the
ambassador
program,
and
then
we
also
need
it
for
the
give
economy
and
it's
like
part
of
those
costs,
I.
Think
okay,.
I
C
I
I
kind
of
see
it
from
Lauren's
point
of
view
of
like
I
mean
for
at
least
for
this
round.
It's
not
useful
and,
like
obviously
you
know,
a
lot
of
the
budgets
were
kind
of
set
at
the
launch.
So
you
know
we
don't
need
to
worry
about
give
backs,
because
that
money
was
allocated
for
five
years
and
some
you
know
a
lot
of
I
feel
like
a
lot
of
it.
C
A
lot
of
the
work
that
you're
proposing
is
like
just
kind
of
reminding
people
what
was
set
at
lunch
and,
if
there's
any
changes
to
it,
that
are
that
need
to
be
made,
or
you
know,
if
we're
gonna
try
I
mean
yeah
if
I
think
it
makes
sense
if
they
give
economy.
Working
group
is
going
to
make
new
proposals
for
using
a
give
token
to
separate
it.
From
this.
C
It's
fine
to
use
this
working
group
proposal
as
a
chance
to
remind
people
hey.
This
is
when
we're
allocating
to
get
the
token,
but
like
I,
don't
know,
I,
don't
yeah
like
Lords
I,
don't
think
there
is
any
there's
going
to
be
a
give
power
up
up
being,
but
not
this
not
in
this
three-month
period.
I!
Don't
think
right!
No.
I
No
and
exactly
it's
like
we're
kind
of
like
aware
of
how
much
we're
spending
we're
cutting
into
fundraising
I
apologize
anyway.
This
is
this
is
going
to
be
up
for
a
while
right,
Lauren
yeah.
I
Yeah
well
perfect,
perfect,
we're
out
of
time,
unfortunately,
but
thank
you
so
much
for
really
talking
about
both
of
these
proposals
appreciate
it.