►
From YouTube: Giveth Livestream - Governance Call - January 24, 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
My
I'm
feeling
good,
I'm
feeling
great
mondays
monday
feels
good,
did
lots
of
yoga
and
I
feel
really
strong,
and
that
feels
good.
My
focus
for
the
week
is
working
and
hacking
on
the
gift,
curation
spec
and
then
also
doing
like
a
super
short
tiniest
version.
Ever
of
the
give
matching
and
so
kind
of
like
working
on
the
developments
in
the
give
economy
and
yeah,
that's
like
my
main
focus
and
then
all
just
the
usual,
the
usual
things.
C
Yeah
my
my
intentions.
Actually,
I
have
a
topic
I'd
like
to
bring
up
around
getting
give
matching
started
a
little
earlier
than
we
than
we
anticipated
due
to
donor
demand.
So
I
definitely
want
to
discuss
that.
I'm
feeling
great
today,
the
tc
is
launching
tomorrow
and
I'm
stoked,
even
though
I
have
to
wake
up
at
3am
because
of
the
half
day
execution
time.
D
Hey
guys
happy
week,
happy
monday,
I'm
feeling
really
rested
and
really
happy
to
have
sam
right
by
the
room.
He's
amazing
been
enjoying
having
him
here
and
learning
a
lot
for
this
week,
I'm
going
to
hack
a
lot
of
on
the
on
the
project,
paralyzing,
the
donation,
the
new
decision
page
and
then
working
on
the
correct
product
creation
view.
No
particular
intentions
for
this
call
just
to
sync
up
and
yeah
be
ready
to
participate
I'll
pass
it
to
kai.
E
Hey
guys,
sorry,
no
camera,
my
big
computer
yeah,
I'm
looking
forward
to
this
week,
some
develop
stuff,
of
course,
also
a
meeting
that
I
invite
griff
and
the
devs
to
if
they
want
tomorrow,
I'll
post
it
again,
my
other
thing
is
I'll
announce
it
in
the
vacations.
It's
like
a
half
vacation,
but
I'm
migrating
to
my
dinner
on
sunday
very
happy
to
have
a
warmer
climate
for
a
couple
of
days
and
yeah.
My
intention
is
to
get
updated
with
this
nice
governance.
C
Okay
in
this
multisig
to
go
to
projects
give
it
before
we
actually
start
distributing
it.
That
way,
we
have
a
bulk
amount
that
we
can
actually
start
with
and
and
then
when,
but
then
we
have
to
figure
out.
How
do
we
want
to
distribute
to
verified
projects
so,
and
I
was
thinking
we
could
make
this
a
governance
decision
about
how
we
do
this
and
we
make
a
couple
options.
We
take
our
time
on
deciding
exactly
how
we
distribute
to
verified
projects
and
we
can
once
we
have
the
snapshot
instance
up.
C
Then
we
can
use
that
to
do
even
ranked
choice.
Voting
on
like
which,
which
distribution
method
is
the
best,
but
they
all
land.
On
the
same
idea,
which
is,
let's
create
a
multi-sig,
I
was
going
to
say
that
we
just
use
the
same
signers
that
we
have
on
the
mainnet
multi-cigs
and
start
collecting
funding
for
it.
I
have
donation.ef
and
we
just
call
it
donation.eth
right,
donate
and
send
money
to
donation.east.
C
We
create
a
project
on
giveth,
people
can
get
givebacks
when
they
send
money
to
it
and
and
then
we
discuss
in
the
forum,
how
do
we
want
to
distribute
this
to
verify
projects?
There's
so
many
ways?
We
could
do
it
infinite
ways
that
we
could
do
it,
and
I
think
it's
worth
like
a
month-long
discussion.
While
we
try
to
collect
the
funds
yeah
marco.
F
Yeah,
would
it
make
sense
to
use
these
new
categories
that
we're
doing
right
now
so
that,
like
all
donations,
could
either
go
by
us
after
we
collect
all
the
funds
in
one
emphasis,
and
then
we
just
like
distribute
that
across
all
categories
like
health
and
wellness,
environment,
nonprofit,
whatever
like
equally
or
maybe,
even
create
all
these
back
buckets
for
all
these
projects
and
they
decide
where
they
want
to
put
the
money.
So
like
saying,
oh
yeah,
sorry
yeah.
C
No,
I
I
mean
this
is
what
I
mean,
there's
like
infinite
ways
to
distribute
the
the
so
I'm
thinking
like,
let's
put
the
ways
to
distribute
as
like
something
we
discuss
for
the
next
month
on
the
forum,
because
there's
like
infinite
things,
but
I
really
would
like
to
get
this
multi-stick
up
asap,
so
people
can
donate
to
it
and
I
wanted
to
know
if
there's
any
initial
thoughts
on
like
do.
We
just
use
a
multi-sig,
a
normal
multi-sig
with
all
of
our.
C
A
B
C
A
A
A
I'm
really
happy
to
see
demand
for
this,
and
I
love
that
I
still
love
the
vision
of
programmatic
donations
to
causes
with
quadratic
matching
and
stuff
and
bitcoin
is
still
working
on
that,
but
was
jack.
Both
chems
were
on
the
block.
Yesterday,
kevin
mentioned
that
they're
really
focused
on
the
transition
from
bitcoin
corp
to
doubt
right
now,
so
the
d
grants
is
a
bit
of
a
ways
out.
So
I
think
this
is
a
great
mvp
solution.
In
the
meantime,
I
just
think
maybe
yeah
we
are
going
to
do
it.
A
One
thing
we
should
do
you're,
probably
already
thinking
of,
but
just
make
it
clear
to
whoever
does
donation
to
the
most
popular.
You
know
if
we
don't
have
all
this
stuff
figured
out
just
whatever
we
can.
Let
them
know
like
hey.
You
know
100
bit
of
projects,
it's
still
tbd.
How
would
malik
get
that,
but
it's
going
to
be
verified,
some
give
it,
maybe
if
they
donate
some
other
crypto,
and
we
have
to
convert
it
like
those
types
of
things
letting
them
know
up
front
before
they
donate
so
that
there's
not
any
unmet
expectations.
Yeah.
B
C
A
C
C
A
C
C
A
And
then
we'll
be
able
to
follow
this
a
little
bit
better
another
one
for
you
give
us
home
partnership
with
don
pass.
Okay,
all
right,
it'll,
be
there
next
week,
don't
worry
in
the
gift
garden.
This
is
it
for
all
the
priority
stuff
that
we
have
in
the
agenda,
so
we'll
just
move
down
into
the
daos
gift
garden,
nothing
to
show
right
now
I
don't
think
there's
any
active
proposals
and
I
don't
think
anything
was
passed
since
we
chatted
last
in
the
nr.
A
Give
we've
got
a
bunch
of
stuff
here,
but
mostly
I
want
to
talk
about
a
permissions
issue
that
I
found,
and
so
our
give
back.
Treasury
agent
doesn't
have
the
permission
to
run
an
epm
script,
and
so
basically,
when
we're
trying
to
do
these
transfers
out
of
the
vault.
For
the
token,
it's
missing
the
permission
so,
for
example,
for
reimbursing
grip
or
give
a
contributor
payments
for
topping
up
the
nr
give
we're
just
going
to
need
to
be
able
to
pass
this
permission,
and
then
we
can
go
back
and
execute
those
votes.
A
I'm
95
sure
that's
it,
but
who
the
hell
knows
these
days
anyway.
So
that's
it
for
that.
We
have
the
carlos's
token
meetings.
We
have
give
backs
that
went
out
last
week
and
we
had
the
test
vote
to
change,
give
drop
recipients
for
the
dr
gif
3,
which
went
through,
and
so,
if
that
looks
good,
then
we
can
actually
make
the
real
change
for
the
kick
drop.
B
B
A
B
C
B
C
A
A
Yeah
so
touching
that
there's
about
a
week
a
little
bit
more
left
to
get
your
q4
energy
distribution
in,
as
we
mentioned
last
week,
we're
kind
of
setting
a
hard
limit
of
one
month
from
when
the
first
goat
vote
goes
in
from
after
that
you
miss
out,
and
then
you
have
to
wait
until
the
next
quarterly
distribution
so
get
that
in.
If
you
haven't
done
it
already,
or
else
you
will
miss
the
boat
going
down
from
there.
A
B
A
A
A
You
say
it
again:
well,
basically,
instead
of
give
us
winning
100k
and
shape-shift
putting
100k
into
this
new
multi-sig.
Basically,
we
swap
100k
worth
of
giveth
and
fox,
and
then
each
org
actually
creates
its
own
lp.
So
it's
not
jointly
shared,
but
we
have
both
the
same
liquidity
tokens
in
our
treasury.
A
D
A
A
Cool
yeah,
this
one's
a
bit
more
interesting,
going
back
to
the
stream
as
a
service.
I
want
to
check
in
on
this
and
see
where
we're
at
with
that,
and
so
maybe
willie
I'll.
Let
you
talk
for
a
bit
thanks
for
your
feedback
this
weekend,
mitch
yeah.
I
thought
it
was
a
good
discussion.
I
feel
like
at
this
point.
I
made
a
case
for
it
and
I
don't
want
to
push
too
hard,
because
you
know
I
recognize
that
if
the
community
doesn't
think
it's
a
priority
that
we
should
prioritize
it.
A
So
I
put
the
reasons
why
I
think
we
should
consider
prioritizing
it.
I
think
it's
a
pretty
good
case.
To
sum
it
up,
I
think
the
main
reasons
why
I
think
this
is
a
good
priority
is
that
we've
already
done
a
lot
of
the
lifting.
So
a
lot
of
the
lifts
for
this
is
relatively
well
left
to
other
stuff.
We
could
do
because
a
lot
of
it
is
copy
paste
from
what
I
understand
we'll
be
able
to
take
a
lot
of
what
we've
already
built
and
make
it
useful
to
other
awesome
projects.
A
A
It
could
potentially
be
one
of
the
most
valuable
things
we
could
do
to
support
our
core
roadmap
in
the
short
term
and
support
also
just
to
give
economy
bring
revenues
into
the
dow
and
have
another
really
cool
benefit
for
the
gift
token
that
will
get
people
the
community
excited
and
get
more
eyeballs
and
give
it.
But
I
do
hear
another
concern.
Is
that
maybe
it
feels
too
like
not
in
line
with
our
mission
too
much
like
yield
forming
djinn,
not
not
region
enough,
not
aligned
with
building
the
future
of
getting
enough.
A
So
I
think
one
thing
that
we
could
consider:
that
is,
if
that's
a
concern,
I
think
something
we
can
consider
to
mitigate.
That
is,
you
know
only
accepting
projects
that
do
have
some
sort
of
social
impact
aspect
to
them,
which
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
great
projects
out
there.
I'd
like
appreciation
because,
for
instance,
everything
we're
building
is
open
source,
public,
good
free
technology.
So
it's
it's
beneficial
for
society
for
us
to
build
it.
A
So
another
thing
that
kevin
seagrass
has
suggested
was
only
accepting
projects
that
don't
join
the
region
collected.
I
don't
know
I
don't
really
like
that
barrier,
but
I
think
that
could
be
something
that
you
know,
but
it
does
take
one
percent
of
their
treasury,
social
goodness
and
then
qualify
them
for
the
game
farm.
A
I
really
like
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
showing
some
more
information
on
these
projects
and
that
could
be
really
cool
even
just
like.
I
thought
I
had
the
idea
yesterday
if
we
had
like
just
one
page
of
information,
and
maybe
it's
even
just
a
given
profile
that
we
just
used
but
a
page
of
information
about
each
of
the
projects
which
a
lot
of
farms
lack
but
like
actually
educating
people
about
here's.
A
What
this
project's
doing,
here's,
why
it's
beneficial
for
the
world
that
could
be
another
really
cool
addition
that
we
talked
about,
and
then
it
makes
the
farm
even
more
interesting.
Here's
all
these
cool
projects
you
can
learn
about
and
how
they're
doing
good
all
these
projects
that
are
doing
good
and
then
farm
and
then
keep
coming
back
to
the
gives,
give
economy
for
five
years,
which
again,
I
think,
is
really
valuable
and
there's
I
don't
think
it's
an
assumption.
A
I
said
a
lot
there
and
then
yeah
unless
I
put
it
up,
I
would
I
totally
want
to
have
a
discussion
here
and
see
if
people
really
like
this
or
people
are
really
really
against
this,
like
I
especially
want
to
get
a
strong
feelings
on
this.
I
I'm
just
thinking
about,
hear
hearing
talk,
talk
about
key
and
matching.
A
I
think
that
would
be
more
regenerative.
You
know,
because
if
we
give
them
the
farms,
we
create
the
partnerships
and
stuff,
but
then
we
can
back
it
up
a
little
bit
by
saying
yes
well,
we
also
collect
like
a
portion
of
this,
like
sometimes
you
know,
when
farms
need
like
a
four
percent,
they
levy
like
a
four
percent
under
something.
So
it's
like
boom.
You
put
your
lp
tokens,
we
leverage
four
percent.
It
goes
into
our
get
matching
pool.
A
Instead
of
you
know
the
developers
taking
the
cut
as
with
most
detailed
projects
yeah,
that's
basically
the
region
collected
like
what
so
you
guys
were
suggesting
was
like
what,
if
you
made
a
requirement
for
each
of
the
projects
like
this,
is
the
farm
to
join
the
region
collected,
and
that
would
basically
do
that,
because
the
bureau
of
collective
is
taking
a
percent.
I
think
it's
just
one
percent
of
the
requirement,
but
of
your
is
it
your
treasury
or
other
revenues?
I
think
it's
revenues
and
then
basically
donating
into
this
new
cause
mvp.
C
Maybe
it's
maybe
it's
automated,
like
we're
saying
we're.
Gonna
have
a
one
percent
fee,
instead
of
being
officially
part
of
regen
collective,
it's
just
like
yeah,
one
percent
goes
to
give
matching
and
one
donation
and
the
other
goes
to
and
another
one
percent
goes
to
giveth.
You
know
so
that
we
can
make
lp
tokens
with
it
and
that's
and
then
so
it's
a
two
percent
automated
for
every
every
group
that
goes
in
and
that's
that's
just
the
deal.
A
I
think
that
would
be
much
more
justifiable
if
it's
like
a
percent
of
the
rewards
they're
putting
to
the
give
stream
taking
that
and
putting
it
too
good,
as
opposed
to
like
their
whole
revenues.
I
think
the
fee
we
don't
cut
from
the
rewards.
We
can
just
like
take
a
cut
of
the
lp
tokens
that
they're
depositing.
C
A
I
think
we
I
mean
we're
using
those
djing
things,
though
it's
like
they
want
to
get
in
the
farms
we
take
a
little
bit.
We
use
it
for
our
own
liquidity
and
then
we
also
can
like
change
that
into
real
value
that
goes
into
the
give
matching
pool,
because
the
thing
is
we
don't
want
to,
like
willy's,
saying
he's
worried
about
the
barrier
entry
for
smaller
projects.
A
But
then
we
are
putting
fees
on
it
to
the
end
user,
which
right
now
have
done
a
good
job
of
like
avoiding
any
fees
to
the
end
user,
which
is
just
pretty
cool
and
it's
a
cool
thing
to
say
we
never
charge
any
fees,
but
I
think
also
the
projects.
They
have
a
big
treasure.
Even
if
you're
a
small
project,
you
do
have
a
big
treasury
of
your
own
tokens.
B
A
A
G
I
definitely
like
the
idea
of
being
more
selective
with
the
projects
that
we
choose
to
partner
with,
as
well
as
like
page
about
each
community
and
what
they're
doing,
and
I
think
that
feels
like
a
lot
better
than
just
having
you
know,
another
dj
farm.
So
having
that
information
there,
I
think,
would
actually
be
valuable
and
even
allow
users
to
get
involved
in
in
other
communities
that
maybe
they
didn't
know
about.
A
A
Yeah.
I
guess
at
this
point
the
probably
the
next
step
would
be
to
create
the
spec
for
the
development
team
and
see
if
we
can
prioritize
on
the
development
side.
We've
already
got
some
early,
some
enough
projects
committed
that
we
could,
you
know
start
building
it
and
launch.
You
know
have
provided
toronto
that
have
revenues
when
we
launch
it.
So
I
guess
a
good
next
step
is
just
to
create
spec
for
development
and
then
kind
of
put
that
up
for
proposals.
B
A
Yeah
sure,
are
you
still
looking
for
more
advice
than
on
the
forum,
or
do
you
feel
confident
yeah
I
can.
I
can
put
up
a
spec,
but
what
definitely
would
help
is
from
the
design
team
how
you
guys
would
like
it
to
look
and
then
I
can
create
the
spec
around
that.
Otherwise
I'm
kind
of
keep
it
open
and
then
we
can
collaborate
on
filling
in
the
design.
Details.
A
C
A
C
C
C
Fat
stacks
of
give
in
it
already
that's
65
million
years.
So
though
we
need
the
snapshot.
Voting
instance
to
like,
I
think,
approve
any
actions
that
we
take
with
that
multisig
and
I
I
think
that
would
be
the
way
to
do
it
and
I
so
we're.
I
think,
that's
blocking
a
lot
of
these.
I
love
this
action,
but
but
for
sure,
when
optimism
sends
the
youth
to
the
address
that
negan
created,
then
we'll
send
it
from
there
to
the
to
the
recruiting
agency.
A
B
A
Yeah,
there's
nothing
new
from
stonke,
but
it
looks
like
there's
a
little
bit
more
action
happening
just
on
creating
the
spanish
translations
first,
so
I
feel
pretty
confident
that
the
spanish
translation
thing
could
happen
and
then
maybe
how
that
goes.
Then
we
can
reach
out
to
stonky
and
see
what
happens
with
terrace
forum.
B
Yeah,
that
sounds
good.
Maybe
we
just
like
we're
like
okay,
mr
bear.
We
like
what
you're
talking
about
and
then
we
like.
Let
him
go
forward
with
like
starting
to
set
up
a
team.
I
think
the
amount
of
funds
he
was
actually
like
requesting
from
the
garden
was
really
small.
It
was
like
700
or
something
give
so
like
he
could.
Like
start
with
that
start,
making
a
team
we
kind
of
like
see
what
what's
coming
out
of
it.
A
C
A
C
I
mean
I,
I
guess
the
only
thing
I
added
since
marco
and
ashley
are
here
are
both
here.
One
thing
that
is
worth
discussing
is
this
idea
of
how
important
it
is
to
get
non-profits
to
use
a
separate
address
than
what
they're
using
to
donate
with,
because
we're
givebacks
is
holding
a
policy
of
first
touch.
C
Donations
only
count,
so
if
someone,
for
instance,
gets
gets
donations
and
then
pays
an
employee
with
those
donations
and
then
that
employee
goes
and
donate
donates
to
projects
on
give
it
they
will
not
get
give
backs,
because
that's
it's
already
that
money
is
now
recirculating
as
opposed
to
nude
money
coming
in.
So
we
wanted
to
like
at
least
have
that.
I
think
it's
worth
having
that
also
come
into
this
discussion
of
donors
versus
nonprofits
profiles.
G
That
really
yeah,
it
seems
like
you,
could
buy
back
and
forth
a
little
bit.
So
we
definitely
need
to
clarify
it
and
figure
out
which
direction
is
the
best
way
to
go.
I
think
also
just
even
if
it's
just
through
comms
or
just
you
know
the
way
that
that
we
present
this
information
to
the
user.
You
know
you,
don't
you
don't
use
your
personal
account
to
do
business
and
you
don't
use
your
business
account
to
you
know,
do
personal
stuff
or
try.
F
Maybe
we
can
figure
out
some
of
the
some
some
solutions
both
on
this
on
the
on
the
from
the
technical
aspect
and
design
and
front-end
side,
but
it
needs
a
little
bit
more
thought
and
conversations.
So
we
get
a
hack
session,
maybe
this
week
for
next
week
move
forward
with
that.
But
for
now
there
are
other
priorities
right
now.
So.
D
Can
I
add
something
it's
really
complicated
and
it's
not
so
funny
for
us
how
to
connect
this.
For
instance,
if
you
have
a
wallet
and
whenever
you
find
a
good
wallet,
your
profile
will
be
designed
mathematically
or
not,
or
how
many
wallets
you
have
and
for
the
circulating
stuff,
it's
the
biggest
for
me
because
cherry
says:
if,
for
instance,
you
you
get
give
you'll
get
some
talk,
you
your
project
owner
your
token,
has
dropped
it
to
ethereum,
give
it
to
someone
else,
it's
wrapped
with
token
again
and
done
it.
D
A
C
So
it's
it's
not
about
where
it's
it's
about,
where
you
get
the
money.
So
if
you
get
the
money
from
a
dow
that
just
minted
the
tokens
like,
for
instance,
all
of
us,
that's
that's
that
that
those
give
tokens
have
never
been
used
on,
give
it
and
receive
give
backs.
So
that's
actually,
okay,
but
it's
when
some
money
already
goes
through,
gets
givebacks
and
then
gets
sent
around
back
to
be
used
again.
C
C
I
I
I
can
understand
that
the
like
perspective
of
like
well,
I
just
someone
I
got
paid
my
salary,
why
you
know
I
want
to
donate
to
this
other
project
with
that
salary.
I
understand
that
perspective,
but
from
a
systemic
like
structural
system,
you
know
it's
like
from
the
systemic
view.
The
the
goal
is
really
to
bring
more
new
money
in,
and
it's
very
easy
to
talk
with
a
couple
projects
and
say
you
donate
to
me
I'll,
donate
to
you.
C
You
know
and
start
having
these
games
being
played,
and
so
the
goal
is
to
stop
games
from
being
played
and
and
like.
If,
if
a
community
wants
to
create
a
circular
economy,
they
should
make
a
circular
economy.
Givebacks
is
not
here
to
support
a
circular
economy.
It's
here
to
bring
the
the
intention
is
to
bring
donations
new
donations
into
the
public
good
space.
So
it's-
and
I
think
we're
circulating
like
giving
give
backs
to
to
you,
know
pro
like
project
owners
is
not
the
intention
necessarily.
A
F
Yeah
I
mean
I
totally
understand
this,
but
I
actually
have
a
real
problem
with
that
because,
like
from
my
perspective
as
a
user,
I
I'm
actually
adding
like
some
liquidity
to
the
farms.
I'm
farming
gift
tokens.
I
can't
wait
to
actually
harvest
them,
because
I
want
to
give
them
away
right
away,
yeah
the
projects
and
give
it
I'm
so
excited
about
it
and
then,
on
the
other
hand,
we're
saying
no.
No,
please
don't
do
that,
because
that's
like
your
gaming
decision.
C
No,
no,
not
at
all,
no
that's
totally
fine,
because
we
can
source
yeah
because
we
can
source
those
funds
from
you
harvested
them,
and
then
you
donated
them.
What
when
we
trace?
What's
not?
Okay?
Is
you
donated
them
to?
Let's
say
you
know
grassroots
economics
and
then
will
ruddick
takes
those
that
money
and
donates
to
give
it
okay,
he
does
not.
He
does
not
get
give
backs
for
that,
because
he
got
that
money
that
money
gave
givebacks
and
now
he's
donating
it
again
to
some
other
project
which
is
like
dude.
C
A
H
Yeah
so
lauren,
so
lauren
already
gave
her
feedback
and
thoughts
on
how
to
make
a
process
or
establish
a
process
for
this
so
yeah.
I
would
like
to
ask
if
there
are
any
other
suggestions
about
how
we
go
around
with
body
system
or
like
a
system
for
voluntary
contributors,
because
I
get
questions
a
lot
about
this
so
yeah.
I
need
to
create
yeah.
I
wanted
to.
G
We
wouldn't
need
to
assign
them
a
buddy,
but
they
still
have
a
resource
that
they
could
use
to.
You
know
get
support
or
like
how
do
I
use
this
tool
or
or
whatever
and
I'll
I'll
elaborate
a
little
bit
more
when
I
respond,
but
I
think
that
we
can
collaborate
here.
We
can
kind
of
have
new
contributors
come
into
this
goal.
E
E
E
The
decision
is
like
we
should
put
a
value
to
different
scenarios,
so
we
can
act
quickly
with
these,
so
we
don't
have
to
have
like
a
full
governance
like
breakout
every
time
for
like
further
rounds
that
we
wouldn't
just
say
as
the
devops,
we
would
come
together
and
say:
hey
what
severity
is
this
okay,
severity,
medium,
critical
or
low?
And
then
we'll
say?
Oh
but
let's
say,
for
example,
low
is
150
bucks
all
right
make
a
proposal
to
the
dollar
to
pay
out.
F
A
Voting
instance
you'll
be
it'll,
be
more
arbitrary
right
because
the
candle
has
to
engage
on
it
or
grip,
and
if
you
do
it
in
the
nr
give
you'll
have
a
five-day
voting
period
normally,
which
normally
is
fine.
It'll
be
less
public
and
it'll
be
more
like
core
team
decision,
yeah
good
good
call.
So
that's
fine.
E
A
Great
well
we're
one
minute
before
the
top
of
the
hour.
I
think
we
we
got
everything,
that's
really
good,
I'm
glad,
and
so
just
maybe
after
this
call
of
course,
the
day,
whatever
check
out
the
forum
leave
some
extra
feedback
in
there
and
we'll
revisit
some
of
these
issues
next
week,
and
we
have
the
dev
call
right
after
this,
so
it
won't
take
any
more
of
your
time.