►
From YouTube: Good Morning!
Description
1 - Team members say 'hello', explain their roles and talk about what happened in their area since the last meeting.
2 - Holacracy group meetings (Rules)
-Break-
3 - Holacracy style discussion
A
A
It
would
be
amazing,
but
if
it
goes
to
ten,
that's
okay,
eleven
is
not
okay,
so
I
will
be
giving
warnings
at
five
minutes.
Three
winners
at
five
minutes:
eight
minutes
and
nine
minutes,
so
I
guess
I
can
start
because
I'm
already
standing
up
here.
So
there
was
a
lot.
There's
been
a
lot
going
on.
Obviously
we
had
Burning
Man,
which
was
a
big
distraction
for
me,
but
also
a
big
opportunity.
B
A
About
giveth
and
in
general,
we
held
a
whole
conference
on
decentralization
and
I,
actually
think
in
the
long
run.
Burning
Man
will
be
a
good
place
to
pull
from.
So
it
was
really
nice
stuff
for
projects.
So
it's
really
nice
to
make
a
showing
there.
We
have
I
had
a
big
move
with
Alice
Desai
there,
our
first
external
party,
to
actually
receive
funds
from
a
given
smart
contract.
A
They
made
they
mark
three
milestones
complete,
but
I
could
only
approve
two
of
them,
so
it
was
an
actual
test
of
our
system
and
it
worked
out
really
well
my
youth.
Our
wallet
I've
met
with
them
a
couple
times
and
they
desperately
want
to
use
our
platform
for
their
donations,
and
we
are
a
couple
steps
away
from
that.
But
it's
good
to
have
them
on
board.
A
Let's
see
yeah
I
think
that's,
oh,
and
then
we
have
this
meeting
and
I'm
gonna.
Try
to
implement
kolakozhi
I
feel
like
we
have
kind
of
budding
of
it
so
far,
and
we've
achieved
that.
But
the
next
move,
I'm
really
excited
about
I've
done
a
lot
of
studying
on
how
to
implement
it
in
our
organization
and
I
to
implement
that.
So
that's
pretty
much
where
I'm
at
maybe
we
can
just
go
around
the
circle.
Zd.
C
C
Mean
I'm
not
sure
if
I'm
the
most
important
one
but
I've
been
working
on
the
prototype.
I
was
working
on
it
earlier
I
mean
basically
most
of
the
time
last
month,
but
I've
been
struggling
a
bit
because
I
don't
think
we
have
a
very
clear
definition
and
the
the
names
are
still
a
bit.
Fuzzy
people
from
the
team
use
different
names
for
the
same
roles.
So
that's
something
that
needs
to
be
clarified.
Also,
I,
don't
think
we
have
a
clear
consensus.
C
What
needs
to
be
in
mobile
and
what
needs
to
be
in
desktop,
but
I've
been
working
on
that,
basically
how
the
DAX
and
how
the
campaigns
will
be
displayed
in
the
UI
stuff,
like
that
with
grace
or
mostly
grace,
she
created
the
product
survey.
I
think
we
have
some
nice
answers.
There,
sort
of
like
a
pointers
of
what's
important
in
the
UI
would
have
information
will
be
sort
of
helpful
for
the
users
to
show
their
yeah.
B
I
mean
a
little
fresh
I
knew
in
the
crypto
scene,
so
I
think
I
achieved
the
fact
that
I
get
a
bit
of
a
better
idea.
What
crypto
is
I'm
watching
the
whole
technology
et
cetera,
then
what
give
it
is
and
what
give
it
once
I,
don't
have
to
ask
you
thousand
times
just
like
twenty
or
thirty
times
so
I
think
that's
a
big
achievement.
B
What
else
oh
I
get
an
understanding
of
what
you
want
to
do
when
you
talk
about
holography
and
got
an
idea,
but
that
still
that's
a
huge
field,
think
I'm
starting
there.
So
then
the
dull,
the
reward
you
know,
I
think
is
at
the
point
where
you
want
it.
That's
definitely
an
achievement.
I
hope,
oh
and
then
like
the
milestones
and
the
expensive
sheets.
So
just.
E
Well,
I
have
not
problem
will
spend
as
much
our
say,
1
to
2
to
2
spending
in
the
giveth.
A
lot
of
things
happens
to
white
hats,
went
to
boarding
vacations,
you
know
has
been
like
not
a
very
productive
month,
but
even
that
we
have
liquid
pledging
contract
done.
We
added
all
the
plugins
staff
who
make
a
first
plugin
when
I
mean
done.
It
means
that
scho
that
more
or
less
the
first
set
of
tests
are
in
there,
but
you
know
some
feedbacks
and
some
steel.
Some
some
fine
tunings
still
needs
to
be
done.
B
F
F
F
F
But
yeah
Def
Con,
that's
really
kind
of
and
I
like
to
think
that
we're
kind
of
to
the
top
of
the
hill
of
where
we're
at
now,
it's
kind
of
downhill,
I'm
kind
of
getting
ready
for
that.
So
I'm
going
to
show
you
guys
if
something
is
real,
quick
up
on
here
to
go
over
some
stuff
that
I
kind
of
did
some
R&D
on
I,
don't
know
exactly
how
the
bullets
gonna
be
to
what
we
are
gonna
have
that
con
I
just
wanted
to
show
you
guys
that
this
work
was
done.
I.
F
F
It's
not
so
much
about
the
UI,
but
I
made
this
other
UI
to
show
kind
of
a
different
way
of
using
structured
data,
instead
of
just
having
the
rich
text
for
campaigning
descriptions
and
whatnot.
So
on
this
model,
if
you
were
to
review
a
milestone,
there's
these
completion
requirements
and
evidence
list
right
here
and
both
pointers
show.
This
is
that
this
would
be
entering
more
structured
data
into
like
the
campaign
or
the
milestone
or
whatever
you.
You
put
your.
F
To
a
description,
you'd
have
to
add
what
you
think
your
completion
requirements
are
going
to
be
and
then,
as
as
you're
going
along
your
milestone,
you'd
be
appending
more,
but
instance,
pieces
of
evidence
to
to
that
milestone
on
the
benefit
of
doing
something
like
that,
you
can
have
a
reviewer
experience.
So
when
the
viewer
comes
in
says,
I
can't
review
this
milestone.
They
can
have
a
survey
up
here.
That's
kind
of
like
a
is
this
milestone.
E
F
F
F
F
Here
is
a
cipher
or
cql
sequel,
and
so
what
that
does
is
it
causes
this
part
over
here
to
kind
of
be
Auto,
filled
or
populated,
with
pest
data
each
of
these
things?
If
you
go
into
them,
they
have
like
a
description
or
we
can
add
whatever
realistic
data
we
want
to.
But
this
is
just
something
to
help
out
with
testing
and
then
so
far
the
decks
they
have
art
and
culture,
art
and
culture
or
women
and
the
campaign's
a
little
bit
more
specific
like
and
also
saves
phalaris,
or
something
like
that.
F
F
If
we
ever
wanted
to
be
like
hey,
how
far
do
donations
really
go?
Where
did
everything
happen
with
for
this
particular
dag
and
where
is
the
real
trickle-down
of
this
person's
donation?
All
the
way
over
here?
All
those
questions
are
Ethernet
more
easily
asked
those
in
a
graph
model
doesn't
mean
you
have
to
use
neo4j.
Maybe
we
do
you
see
queue
up?
F
F
F
I
made
this
document
that
I
feel
like
coming
I'll,
send
it
to
everyone
to
go
over
now
that
documents,
why
what
we
kind
of
have
been
doing
with
our
process
that
it's
been
so
far
in
terms
of
you
know
kind
of
our
policy
or
lack
thereof,
and
then
for
the
white
paper.
I
started
it
a
little
while
ago
and
I
kind
of
have
some
some
holes
that
need
to
be
filled
in,
but
I
kind
of.
F
B
Yeah
so
over
the
last
month
or
two
I
guess,
the
first
kind
of
priority
was
getting
the
current
down
in
a
semi
usable
state
and
then
I've
also
been
working
on
just
kind
of
getting
server
infrastructure
and
setting
that
up
for
feathers
and
getting
a
theory
of
node,
running,
etc,
and
then
in
the
new
DAP
I,
implemented
a
wallet
or
started
implementing
a
wallet.
It's
mostly
work,
there's
still
some
tweaks
that
need
to
be
done,
but
it's
probably
usable
for
us.
A
D
So
in
very
short,
I'm
in
charge
of
the
I
call
the
documentation.
It's
it
was
a
part
of
documentation,
for
me
is
the
website,
the
wiki,
the
video
kind
of
nudging
people
to
supply
content,
supply
content,
myself
yeah.
What
I
did
in
since
the
last
persona
meeting
was
taking
over
the
website
and
making
little
changes
for
to
adapted
to
our
needs?
D
B
D
G
We
didn't
go
to
Burning
Man,
so
the
some
of
us
who
stayed
behind
actually
get
some
some
work
done
in
another
area,
so
we
advanced
in
identifying
some
potential
decentralized,
altruistic
communities.
So
that's
something
that
it's
a
dear
to
my
heart,
because
this
is
really
what
I
was
going
to
fill
in
out
that
and
what's
going
to
bring
the
value
in
many
ways.
So
what
we
are
looking
at
is
actually
talking
to
the
community.
G
Are
there
identifying
the
the
possible
dots
that
will
be
important
to
us
and
engage
them
in
a
conversation
and
kind
of
sharing,
what
they're
doing
they're
the
cause
and
the
purpose
and
getting
them
in
our
that
channel
and
hopefully
onboarding
some
of
them?
You
know
first
version
of
the
back.
The
second
thing
is
the
the
visual
identity,
and
that's
that's
something
that
I
had
fun
doing
with
with
Alan.
Who
is
going
to
tell
us
later
about
what
we
did
from
that
area?
G
But
in
any
case
a
I
would
like
to
mention
that
we
have
identified
our
visual
identity
as
going
into
the
streams
one,
meaning
that
we
will
have
an
identity
for
the
Deaf
ourselves.
We
are
that
and
we
have
our
own
identity
and
our
platform
I'll,
give
it
three
I
would
have
its
own,
so
I
will
explain
that
a
little
bit
later
in
more
detail
and
how
we
evolved
to
kind
of
come
to
that
decision.
F
G
Transparent
way,
so
that
we
can
also
show
to
anyone,
since
our
spending
very
clearly
what
we
are,
where
we
are
spending
the
funds
and
how
we
are
using
them.
So
that
means
also
a
new
ways,
new
ways
to
obtain
expenses
and
so
on.
And,
lastly,
we
did
some
surveys,
two
of
them
in
fact,
one
for
the
product
which
we
got
some
response
from
from
a
community,
and
that
was
very
positive.
It
was
more
genetic
and
kind
of
understanding
how
people
feel
about
charity.
G
Oh
girl,
we
got
some
some
great
feedback
in
terms
of
what
people
are
expecting
from
from
the
from
the
product
itself
and
the
second
one
was
more
internal
focused
just
to
understand
how
the
team
feels
about
integrating
into
what
they
give
us
back
means
and
our
governance
model
or
holacracy.
And
how
do
we
see
ourselves.
G
B
Then
I've
outlined
what
should
be
in
the
product
in
the
future
and
I
wanted
to
present
it
though
I
don't
have
it
really
ready.
I
did
wave
with
Jenny
and
with
grace
we
did
finances
from
the
beginning,
because
I
more
and
more
realized
that
building
we
have
money
to
build
MVP,
but
like
that's
where
it
starts
right.
That's
where
we
actually
will
starts
to
need
to
push
and
that's
something
really.
We
should
really
focus
on
as
well
and
then
worked
a
little
bit
with
Z
on
the
UX
and
with
Grayson
on
the
branding
logo.
A
We're
all
aware
of
all
that,
and
so
that's
really
exciting,
because
everyone's
working
so
hard
but
I
think
that
we
could
probably
start
organizing
ourselves
in
a
little
more
formal,
structured
way
and
so
I'm
gonna
try
to
implement
some
holacracy
methods.
The
there
is
a
on
our
agenda,
which
I
will
send
out
to
everyone
right
here.
A
Then
don't
sew
domains
are
really
important.
It's
kind
of
stuff
that
you
feel
like
you
have
ownership
to,
and
it's
important
to
kind
of
like
mark
your
territory,
so
that
if
someone
else
does
starts
doing
that,
then
you
can
be
like
well
that's
kind
of
my
domain.
So
maybe
we
can
like
work,
elaborate
more
collaboratively.
A
B
F
F
A
F
A
A
G
A
A
A
A
So
when
either
you
know
it
doesn't
have
to
be
done
necessarily
even
during
this
meeting,
but
on
Friday
I'm
gonna
check
in
with
everyone
at
our
next
governance
meeting
and
see
cuz
we'll
get
into
our
governance
meetings
right
after
this
and
see
if
everyone's
filled
out
their
account
abilities
and
their
metrics
to
understand
what
an
accountability
is.
I
put
a
link
there
and
metrics:
it's
free-flowing,
you
guys
decide
every
every
roll
has
a
different
style
of
metrics.
That
is
needed.
So
it's
an
open-ended
question.
A
A
Metric
is
a
metric
means,
something
that
you
can
look
at
and
see
say
yes
or
no.
This
roll
is
being
completed
in
a
satisfactory
this
way
right
so
maybe
for
let's
say,
external
comms
right.
The
role
of
external
comms,
a
blog
post,
has
to
be
written
every
week
right
and
then
so
was
it.
You
know
that
that
would
be.
The
metrics
was
a
blog
post
rated
this
week
and
if
the
goal
is
once
a
week,
then
you
know
you're
failing
at
your
metric.
A
A
A
A
I
want
to
implement
a
weekly
governance
movement,
so
governance
meetings
are
designed
to
focus
on
changing
how
roles,
work
and
changing
the
responsibilities.
The
accountabilities
and
the
metrics
of
a
role.
The
goal
is
to
in
Calaca,
see
in
general,
is
to
try
to
stay
focused
on
roles.
I
think
this
is
valuable
because
it
helps
get
people
above
like
feeling
personally
attacked
if
they
don't
feel
like.
A
Based
off
of
these
defined
things
that
we
have
in
our
magical
little
spreadsheet,
then
it
will
make
it
easier
to
get
done
on
our
own,
because
we
know
who
is
responsible
for
what
decisions
and
if
we
have,
if
we
are
doing
something
that
we
know
will
affect
someone
else's
domain,
we
can
just
go
control.
Let's
do
the
spreadsheet
and
see
whose
domain
it
is
and
go
talk
to
them.
A
Governance
meetings
are
where
we
resolve
conflicts
that
weren't
achieved
during
the
week,
and
also
it's
it's
not
so
much
about
conflicts
between
people,
it's
conflicts
with
where
we
are
now
and
where
we
want
to
be
in
the
future
right
in
general,
that's
called
attention,
so
attention
can
be,
of
course,
negative.
Like
you
know
this,
this
blog
post
was
written
in.
It
looks
really
crappy
like
right,
like
we
need
that
there
are
two
ways
to
achieve
theirs:
governance.
A
And
so
governance
me
is
where
we
start
that
attacking
a
spreadsheet,
basically
we're
gonna
do
a
practice
one
in
a
second,
but
I
want
to
talk
about
the
roles,
so
you
in
general,
there
is
always
going
to
be
a
facilitator.
Who
is
going
to
kind
of
run?
The
meeting
run,
the
governance
meeting
and
the
filter
is
a
tough
role
because
they
have
to
be
like
kind
of
the
referee
and
their
job
is
to
make
sure
the
rules
of
the
media
are
respected
and,
and
they
are
in
charge
of
interrupting
people.
A
You
guys
can
read
the
details
on
that.
If
you
want,
but
whatever
you
know
the
facilitators,
the
boss,
everyone
listens
to
him
benevolent
dictator,
meaning
the
secretary
is
the
person
who
kind
of
helps
the
facilitator
write
down
the
you
know
the
agenda
items,
and
it
also
is
a
very
important
role
because
they
are
the
person
who
kind
of
breaks
the
tie.
If
there's
a
misinterpretation
of
what
happened
in
the
meeting
they're
responsible
for
interpreting
the
truth,
they
are
the
single
source
of
truth
for
what
happened
in
the
meeting.
A
So
if
one
person
says
one
thing,
another
person
says
another
thing
like
wait:
I
thought
I
had
domain
over
the
blog
I
thought.
I
had
them
win
over
the
blog,
it's
a
Secretary's
job
to
say.
Actually
this
person
said
that
they
have
this
person,
you
know,
was
elected
to
domain
in
the
blog
and
then
I'll
talk
about
the
other
three
roles.
A
A
E
G
A
And
if,
if
this
is
fun-
and
it
seems
like
a
good
way
to
go,
I
hope
that
individual
circles,
like
the
branding
circle,
can
kind
of
use
this
occasionally
as
well,
and
at
least
this
style
in
Chrissy.
They
have
two
types
of
meetings:
they
have
the
governance
meeting,
which
is
specifically
about
fulfilling
roles
and
making
sure
that
a
role
has
the
right
duties
and
all
these
kinds
of
things
and
and
then
they
have
tactical
meetings,
which
is
more
specific
about
actually
achieving
the
answer.
A
So
in
the
governance
meeting
you
might
say,
like
I
have
attention
and
it's
that
I.
Don't
think
that
the
colors
that
we
have
are
really
great
and
I
would
like
to
propose
that
I'd
be
involved
with
the
branding
decisions
on
the
colors
of
our
website.
Whereas
a
tactical
meeting
might
be
hey,
I
think
colors
suck,
that's
the
tension,
and
the
proposal
is
that
we
use
blue
and
green
and
step
right.
A
B
A
That's
enough
control.
Every
meeting
starts
with
a
check-in,
so
we
go
around
and
everyone
has
about
20
seconds
to
say
what
is
distracting
them
and
what
their
intention
for
the
median
is
right.
So
I'm,
distracted
by
the
king
fact
that
I'm
on
camera
right
now
and
I'm
talking
about
stuff,
I,
don't
really
know
and
well
at
least
haven't
practiced.
So
much
and
I'm
really.
My
intendent
for
this
meeting
is
for
us
to
learn
how
to
play
this
game.
I
think
it
will
be
fun
and
very
rewarding
on
helping
us
move
effectively.
C
B
B
B
D
B
E
C
Louder,
please
add
my
actual
job
people.
People
keep
bothering
me
even
on
vacation
the
intention
probably
to
find
out
how
it
can
be
more
of
a
help,
even
with
this
limited
time.
Maybe
what
the
team
wants
me
to
deliver
and
with
something
like
a
clear
re
s
which
need
to
be
sold
so
so
that's
probably
that
perfect.
A
A
B
H
A
H
A
So
now
we
build
an
agenda.
The
goal
here
is:
if
there's
something
you
want
to
talk
about.
Ideally
it's
something
that
there's
a
problem
and
you
will
state
what
the
problem
is
or
tension
right,
so
something
you
want
to
see
changed,
and/or
a
change.
We
need
to
make
in
our
governance
structure
to
address
an
issue
that
comes
up
and
the
proposal
to
change
it.
So
three
words
max
anyone.
A
E
G
A
C
A
G
A
A
A
Okay,
so
the
first
thing
you'll
do
is
you'll,
say
the
tension
and
then
you'll
make
a
proposal
to
resolve
it,
and
then
the
next
round
will
be
clarifying
questions.
So
everyone
gets
a
chance
to
ask
the
proposer
questions.
I'm
gonna
be
the
proposer,
because
blog
post
is
my
first
thing
and
then
everyone
will
get
to
say
well,
I,
don't
really
understand
this,
and
this
is
kind
of
the
see
in
the
hands
of
Hayek's
I
find
questions,
and
anyone
can
ask
during
any
time
a
clarifying
question.
A
Okay,
so
my
proposal
is
we,
my
intention
is,
we
haven't,
had
a
blog
post
in
a
while
since
Grace's
blog
post-
and
that
was
the
first
time
and
I'd
like
to
make
that
I'm
more
regular.
My
proposal
is
that
we
create
a
weekly
blog
post,
all
the
way
till
that
time
and
the
proposal
to
do
that.
The
actual
proposal
is
that
we
create
a
role
for
who's.
D
A
In
general,
this
is
I
would
love
to
talk
to
you
about
that,
but
in
general,
so
all
these
clarifying
questions,
he
gets
a
question
and
then
I
respond
and
then
it's
it
crosstalk.
But
in
general,
with
this,
it's
not
about
how,
like
the
details,
it's
more
about
who's,
making
the
decisions
and
who's
responsible.
A
G
H
H
A
The
next
round
is
reactions
and
reactions
is
the
the
reactions
is
really
fun
and
its
really
dangerous.
This
is
where
governance
meetings
go
back.
Okay
and
that's
okay:
okay,
because
in
the
reaction
round
we
go
around
and
everyone
has
a
chance
to
react,
that's
it
right,
that's
fine
or
it
could
be,
then
almost
filibustering
with
an
hour-long
talk
and
that's
also,
sadly,
okay,
okay,
so
this
is
this
is
the
biggest
part
of
the
meeting,
and
every
proposal
would
go
through
the
same
reactions.
Okay,
so
we're
gonna
start.
What's
your
reaction.
H
H
E
Very
much
in
our
mind
for
me
it
should,
but
it
should
not
be
based
on
a
base.
It
should
not
be
once
for
a
week,
but
should
be
so.
You
have
something
to
communicate.
I
agree
that
we,
we
should
have
many
things
to
commit
a
that
feels
once
a
week.
Ok,
but
should
be
a
consequence,
not
another
core,
but
all
these
we
need
to
communicate
things.
We
have
a
lot
of
things
that
we
gave
but
should
be
based.
The
decisions
was
to
make
or
not
to
make
a
force
because
you
have
to
you.
E
B
A
Anyway,
that
one
really
fast
so
next
is
the
amending
clarify.
So
this
is
where
I
get
a
chance
to
change
my
proposal
and
clarify
it
even
further
based
off
the
reactions,
so
the
tension
still
remains.
I
want
to
clarify
my
proposal
and
amendment
to
say:
let's
start
a
weekly
blog
post
circle
and
we
and
I
would
like
anyone.
A
Will
develop
a
strategy
for
how
the
blog
post
fits
in
with
our
overall
strategy?
Okay,
so
now
this
is
that's
my
proposal
and
the
next
thing
is
the
objection
round.
So
this
is
where
one
at
time
everyone
has
gets
to
say
a
reason.
Why
adopting
this
proposal
would
cost
arm
or
said,
give
it
back?
Okay,
so
it's
not
about
fear
or
worry.
It
has
to
be
a
concrete
reason
why
this
proposal
would
actually
cause
harm
to
some
other
giveth
or
giveth
backwards
and
there's
more
details
here.
A
Obviously,
and
the
objections
will
get
tested,
and
so
if
the
objection
doesn't
obviously
fit
that
like
causing
harm
or
saying
giveth
backwards,
then
I'll
ask:
how
do
you
believe
it
will
cause
harm
or
second
backwards?
Does
the
objection
still
exist
if
the
proposal
wasn't
implemented
right?
So
is
your
objection,
something
that's
a
problem
with
given
in
general,
not
just
this
proposal
and
is
the
proposal
safe
enough
to
try,
knowing
that
we
can
address
problems
later,
so
it's
like
if
this
might
cause
a
problem
potentially?
Is
it
safe
enough
to
try?
A
H
H
A
E
B
A
Receipt
is
not
really
made
for
voting,
there's
only
one
time
in
see
that
there's
a
boat
and
that's
when
two
people
want
the
same
role
and
then
there's
a
vote
amongst
the
team
in
holacracy.
You
delegate
authority
to
an
individual
and
they
are
in
charge
of
making
sure
that
it
happens.
The
way
that
they
think
it
should
happen.
And
if
that
starts
getting
in
the
way
of
other
people
and
their
roles,
then
we
have
tension
and
we
we
debate,
who
have
the
authority
over
the
whole.