►
From YouTube: The Graph's Community Talk
Description
The Graph’s first Community Talk
This video was recorded: Tuesday, July 27 @ 8am PST, 2021.
Sections:
0:00 Purpose of Community Talk
5:41 Agenda; Community Updates
6:17 Wave 2 Grants
8:44 Council Meeting Recap
11:40 Find Your Indexer
15:57 Governance Updates
18:57 EhCC Recap
25:37 Curation Launch Impressions
56:19 Hackathon EhCC
The Graph's Media:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/graphprotocol?s=20
Instagram: https://instagram.com/graphprotocol
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/theg...
Website: https://thegraph.com
A
We
now
have
the
core
defs
meeting,
which
is
occupying
the
time
slot
that
the
town
hall
meeting
used
to
own,
which
is
typically
the
first
week
of
the
month,
and
today
we
are
also
launching
the
graphs
community
talk
which
is
going
to
be
scheduled
going
forward.
Typically,
the
third
week
of
the
month
in
the
court
depth
meeting.
A
We
are
going
deeper
into
both
technical
discussions
and
governance
topics,
and
that
will
be
essentially
our
area
of
focus
there
with
community
talk.
We
are
looking
to
have
a
complementary
component
where
we
are
looking
to
accomplish
essentially
three
things.
First
of
all,
we
want
to
be
informative
with
what
we're
doing
here,
being
the
one-stop
shop
for
community
updates.
A
A
We
also
want
to
be
educational.
We
know,
blockchain
technology
itself
takes
time
to
understand
how
it
all
works,
and
the
graph
is
one
of
the
most
complex
protocols
out
there,
and
we
are
very
cognizant
of
that
and
want
to
provide
a
platform
with
the
community
talk
for
the
community
to
get
deeper
insights
on
topics
that
you
want
to
know
about,
and
we're
doing
this
really.
You
know
also,
as
part
in
the
larger
picture
for
progressive
decentralization.
A
Lastly,
we
also
want
to
be
interactive,
and
with
that,
we
don't
just
want
to
throw
the
bus
work
with
it,
but
we
really
want
to
hear
from
you.
We
want
to
know
what
are
the
topics
that
you
want
to
hear
about
and
also
specific
questions
that
you
have
as
we
are
talking
about
these
topics
and
with
that
we
are
actually
also
trying
out
something
new,
which
is
a
tool
called
slido
and
pedro
is
actually
going
to
tell
us
all
about
it.
How
it
is
going
to
facilitate
sort
of
the
engagement
during
community
talk.
B
B
Basically
can
you
can
go
on
to
slider
with
oliver
is
now
showing
thanks
all
over
you
can
ask
any
question
you
may
you
may
have
everybody
can
upload
on
the
questions
that
people
will
ask
there
and
then
what
we
will
do
is
periodically
check
on
those,
and
the
most
supported
ones
should
be
addressed
so
feel
free
to
ask
anything
really
could
be
seen
as
a
sort
of
ama,
and
we
will
also
be
running
some
polls,
as
you
can
see,
on
the
right.
Yes,
as
oliver
is
now
showing.
B
A
And
you
all
find
that
link
in
the
chat.
All
you
have
to
do
is
click
on
it
and
you
will
be
taken
to
slido
right
away.
You
can
ask
your
question
either
as
anonymous
or
you
can
leave
your
name.
Whichever
way
you
prefer,
there's
no
preference
there.
I
find
it
really
exciting,
because
it's
not
just
about
asking
questions
but
keeping
sort
of
a
structure
around
that,
and
so
we
can
also
see
what
is
the
fault,
because
you
can
vote
on
those
questions.
A
Okay.
So,
let's
start
off
with
community
updates,
this
is
going
to
be
our
agenda.
We
will
provide
you
broad
updates.
What
happened
here
over
the
last
two
to
three
weeks.
You
see
the
list
over
here
and
you
know
the
big
segment
that
we
have
for
today,
where
we're
going
to
dive
deeper
into
will
be
curation
launch,
and
for
that
we
have
slim
chance
presenting,
and
we
also
have
a
couple
of
community
members
here
that
I'm
excited
to
hear
from,
and
this
will
be
all
around
sort
of
reviewing
and
recapping.
C
It's
oliver
hi
everyone.
It's
really
awesome
to
be
a
part
of
this
first
community
call
and
really
excited
to
share
some
updates
regarding
wave
2
and
what
we're
funding
in
this
wave
just
wanna
before
I
go
ahead
and
share
what
we're
doing
for
wave
two
one
misconception
I
wanna
make
sure
I
clarify
is
grant
applications
are
always
open.
C
The
waves
are
really
just
meant
for
us
to
communicate
with
the
community
around
what
is
being
funded
every
wave,
but
the
grants
application
portal
does
never
closes
and
we're
always
reviewing
applications,
and
I
also
want
to
encourage
that
there
is
no
such
thing
as
a
bad
idea.
So
if
you
do
have
something
in
mind
that
you
would
like
to
do
or
contribute
with
the
graph
ecosystem,
whether
it's
from
a
community
standpoint
adapts
or
subgraph
protocol
or
tooling
perspective
or
even
research
shoot.
C
That
idea
we're
more
than
happy
to
take
a
listen
and
provide
you
feedback.
If,
if
there's
something,
that's
that
could
be
improved
or
something
that
we
could
fund
in
the
future.
But
with
that
said,
we're
really
excited
to
announce
that
we
have
a
funded
over
2.8
million
dollars
into
grants
and
ecosystem
support
for
wave
2.
C
protocol
infrastructure
will
get
about.
90
000.
tooling
will
get
an
exciting
290
thousand
dobson
subgraphs
will
get
a
whopping
365
000
and
community
building
will
also
receive
280
thousand.
We
also
are
going
to
be
looking
into
research
and
security
audits,
which
will
be
funded
around
1.5
million,
and
then
our
ecosystem
contributors
and
foundation
contributors
will
see
about
350k,
but
yeah.
C
We're
really
excited
to
meet
all
of
you
and
please
submit
any
of
your
ideas
and,
if
you're
not
really
sure
where
to
start,
you
don't
have
an
idea.
We
did
launch
our
rfp
program.
This
is
where
a
lot
of
these
ideas
have
been
collectively
put
together
by
the
community
and
by
the
graph
and
edge
and
node
and
figuring
out
what
sort
of
projects
you
can
hop
in
and
work
on,
as
well
so
check
out
as
those
are
always
going
to
be
continuously
updated
back
to
you.
Oliver.
A
A
Okay,
we
move
on
council
meeting
recap,
so
we
have
a
council
of
10
members
that
most
of
you
know
about
and
they're
getting
together
every
other
week
and
are
discussing
really
the
most
important
and
critical
aspects
of
what's
been
happening,
especially
with
regards
to
governance,
and
you
see
also
the
forum
post
every
other
week
where
we
are
recapping
the
notes
from
the
meeting
as
well.
So
that's
opportunity
that
I
want
to
refer
to.
A
That
is
something
that
I
encourage
everyone
to
keep
an
eye.
On
last
time,
they've
met
was
meeting
number
nine.
On
july
13
we
reviewed
the
delegator
experience
enhancement
workshop
that
is
currently
going
on
where
we
have.
I
think
it's
now
14
different
enhancement
proposals
that
we
have
deep
discussions
around
in
the
community
and
with
the
stable
delegation
rewards.
We
essentially
have
the
first
vip
draft
that
has
been
created
by
ariel,
which
is
a
very
interesting
proposal
that
I'd
like
to
promote.
Actually,
here
right
now
to
provide
you
know:
feedback
on
from
the
community.
A
It
is
one
that
really
solves
you
know.
A
number
of
things
for
delegators
and
indexers,
like
delegators,
will
have
an
improved
ability
to
actually
compare
indexer
reward
cuts
in
a
more
transparent
way
for
indexers.
It
is
aimed
to
be
more
of
a
streamlined
setup
where
you
don't
have
to
continuously
manually
track
how
your
overall
delegation
ratio
is
in
your
indexing
pool,
and
it
also
eliminates
the
ability
for
what
is
currently
theoretically
possible
as
a
sandwich
attack.
So
there's
three
benefits
we
get
from
that.
Please
provide
feedback
on
it.
A
That
was
an
initial
view
in
response
to
what
we've
seen
early
on,
there's
been
a
lot
of
discussion
around
curation
since
then,
and
I'm
not
going
deeper
into
this
I'll
leave
that
to
our
segment
of
curation
launch
impressions
later
on.
But
that
is
a
proposal
that
is
out
there.
Arbitration
charter
ratification
has
been
discussed
as
well,
and
the
need
to
finalize
that
for
voting
the
council
and
then
general
discussions
around
the
launch
and
wave
2
grants
updates
that
essentially
reim
has
just
described
as
well.
A
All
right
find
your
indexer.
This
is
a
question
that
comes
up
quite
a
bit,
so
we
feel
it's
a
great
opportunity
to
touch
base
on
that
subject
and
let
everyone
know
how
do
you
identify
your
indexer
and
we
don't
promote
specific
indexers
here,
but
rather
want
to
talk
about
what
tools
are
available
to
you,
ream.
You
want
to
cover
that
for
us.
C
C
Some
of
my
favorite
series,
as
well,
is
the
indexer
office
hours.
This
is
something
that
happens
every
tuesday.
I
want
to
say
it's
at
10
a.m.
Pst
1
p.m.
Eastern
and
you
know
translate
that
into
whatever
times
when
you
are
hopefully,
but
they
are
really
exciting
and
they
are
recorded.
So
if
you
do
miss
them,
you
are
definitely
able
to
to
listen
in,
but
they
are
live
office
hours
similar
to
when
you
used
to
go
to
school
and
knock
on
your
professor's
door
to
ask
them
questions.
C
This
is
exactly
what
this
is
meant
for.
We
also
have
different
avenues
for
dashboards,
telegram,
chats
and
twitter
accounts,
and
the
graphtronauts
has
done
a
really
good
job
in
putting
together
an
indexer
review
dashboard.
So
that's
a
really
great
way
to
also
figure
out
which
indexer
to
delegate
to
or
understand
a
little
bit
more
about
what
they're
doing.
But
my
favorite
favorite
series
and
this
happens.
Bi-Weekly
is
our
know,
your
indexer
series,
so
I
believe
we're
on
the
15th
edition
at
this
moment.
C
But
what's
really
really
cool
about
know,
your
indexer
is
that
it
strips
down
all
the
technicals
goes
into
getting
to
know
the
indexer
really
from
like
a
personal
level,
and
then
it's
posted
on
the
graph
form.
There's
a
short
q.
A
and
the
community
can
get
involved
by
asking
some
questions
to
the
indexer
and
the
indexers
will
come
in
and
answer
your
questions
right
on
the
graph
form.
C
So,
if
you're
not
familiar
with
what
the
graph
forum
is,
we're
happy
to
share
all
the
resources
here,
so
you'll
definitely
have
a
lot
of
different
places
to
interact
with
your
indexers
and
if
there
are
any
other
other
suggestions
and
ideas
as
to
how
you'd
like
to
see
your
indexers
get
involved,
the
grants
program
is
definitely
a
great
way
to
pose
those
ideas
back
to
you.
Oliver.
A
Awesome,
thank
you,
rheem
yeah.
We
have
a
lot
of
indexers
that
are
really
active
in
many
different
ways,
and
you
know
it's
it's
great
to
see.
I
personally
I
love
the
index
office
hours
they're
getting
together
once
a
week
there.
I
think
it's
every
tuesday
today
right
in
a
couple
of
hours
again,
so
I
also
highly
recommend
it's
highly
informative.
A
You
know
the
discussions
that
they
have
there,
I'm
looking
at
our
questions
right
now
and
I
see
a
couple
of
curator
questions
and
let's
I'm
gonna
park
those
for
now,
because
we
are
having
dedicated
curation
discussions
at
the
end
of
our
segment
and
we
can
go
deeper
into
that.
There's
one
question
for
reem:
can
you
tell
me
where
to
find
more
info
about
the
rfps.
C
C
We
are
getting
a
lot
of
interest
in
the
rfp.
So
if
we
don't
get
to
you,
it's
not
that
we
don't
like
you
or
we
don't
think
that
you
can
do
the
work,
it's
possible
that
it's
just
been
picked
up,
but
just
keep
an
eye
out
and
you're.
Also
more
than
welcome
to
ping
myself
or
pedro
a
message
on
discord,
and
we
can
definitely
let
you
know
the
status
of
the
rfp.
But
thanks
for
the
interest
and
and
your
excitement
and
applying
for
them.
B
A
Okay
chat,
all
right:
let's
move
on
to
governance
updates
we're
not
going
into
deep
discussions
on
governance
topics
during
the
community.
Talk
if
you
are
interested
you
know
in
in
deeper
discussions,
make
sure
to
join
our
court
deaths
call,
which
is
the
first
week
of
each
month,
but
I
wanted
to
take
the
opportunity
to
give
you
a
high
level
overview
of
where
we
are
with
different
discussions.
You
know
everything
around
governance.
A
What
you
see
here
is
sort
of
like
a
progression.
You
know
on
different
subjects.
You
know
it
starts
typically
at
the
left.
When
somebody
raises
a
topic
on
a
governance
discussion
and
then
it
moves
along.
You
know
we
then
produce
a
gip.
We
go
into
snapchat
polling
and
voting,
and
if
everything
goes
well,
then
the
council
will
approve
in
the
end,
so
that's
sort
of
like
the
natural
progression
from
left
to
right.
A
Now,
let's
review
it
from
right
to
left,
though,
because
I'd
like
to
start
with
the
ggp
o3
and
d04
that
have
been
voted
on
by
the
council
successfully,
so
they
have
passed
they
are.
You
can
see
the
details
in
the
snapshot
voting
itself.
You
find
that
in
the
forum
the
dispute
manager
update
is
around
differing
slashing
percentages
for
indexer,
rewards
and
query
fees.
Ggp04
is
a
combination
of
three
different
vips
and
all
of
them
have
passed.
A
The
arbitration
charter
I
touched
on
that
earlier
has
been
voted
on
by
the
community
and
now
needs
to
go
to
council
voting,
which
should
is
anticipated
to
happen
shortly
and
what
we
have
in
gip
development
stage
so
far
is
the
stable
delegation
rewards
yield.
That
is
the
vip
draft
that
I
referenced
earlier.
That
ariel
has
created
and
put
out
in
the
forum,
and
then
we
have
a
number
of
curation
related
proposals.
A
A
First
one
is
the
deploy
and
signal,
and
the
second
one
that
is
not
posted
yet,
but
he
has
signaled
in
the
forum
that
he's
working
on
it.
Right
now
is
the
subgraph
change
of
ownership,
and
then
at
the
community
discussion
level
we
have
a
number
of
things
going
on.
I've
touched
on
delegation,
experience
enhancements
and
the
core
desk
meeting.
A
So
this
is
a
an
exercise
where
we
want
to
create
a
roadmap
really
for
the
delegation
improvements,
and
then
we
have
a
number
of
curation
related
discussions
going
on
and
we're
going
to
dive
deeper
into
that
here
shortly
with
slim
chance:
okay,
ecc
recap:
last
week
we
had
a
big
conference
in
paris.
We
had
a
number
of
folks
present
there,
including
rheem,
including
netter
as
well,
who
joined
us
too
too.
So
I'm
going
to
pass
it
on
to
riemann
natter
to
give
us
some
updates
and
impressions
of
ecc.
C
Thanks
oliver
yeah,
I
mean
as
a
first
time
goer
to
any
really
ethereum
conference.
This
was
definitely
really
exciting
and
eye-opening.
To
me,
what
was
really
refreshing
is
seeing
a
lot
of
og,
crypto
friends
getting
together
and
catching
up
on.
I
think
it
was
the
last
16
months
since
the
last
ethereum
conference
was
around,
but
what
was
really
magnificent
about
this
was
just
how
multi-blockchain
and
cross-chain
everything
was.
C
It's
really
encouraging
a
a
community
of
decentralization
and
open
source
really
fitting
in
with
this,
with
this
sentiment
that
you
know
everything
applies
here
and
everything
can
work
here.
One
of
my
highlights
was
vitalik's
talk.
I
know
that
we've
seen
a
lot
of
really
exciting
things
come
out
of
defy
and
nfts
and
not
to
do
a
a
small
grants
job
here,
but
I
think
he
may
have
hinted
at
a
couple
of
ideas
for
the
community
to
get
involved
in
one
of
them.
C
But
really
we're
really
trying
to
decentralize
work
by
allowing
everybody
to
get
involved,
whether
it's
a
small
or
huge
piece
of
the
pie
and
contribute
to
the
ecosystem
and
making
sure
everything
is
open
source.
So
somebody
else
or
another
team
can
pick
up
where
you
left
off
and
grow
and
evolve
what
was
provided
into
the
into
the
ecosystem.
D
Yeah,
that
was
a
great
intro.
I
mean
it
was
also
my
first
personal,
like
ethereum
community
event,
and
I
met
with
quite
a
few
people,
and
you
know
watched
some
really
interesting
talks.
It
seemed
a
lot
of
the
discussions
where,
of
course,
still
centered
a
little
bit
around
d5,
but
I
think
people
are
trying
to
kind
of
move
on
to
like
the
next
thing.
So
you
heard
a
lot
of
talks
around
nft's
fractionalization
of
assets.
You
heard
a
lot
of
talk
about.
D
You
know,
I
would
say
some
of
the
stuff
that
mentioned
like
how
how
to
build
out
replacements,
for
maybe
some
of
the
existing
web
2
applications
that
you
see
out.
There
are
alternatives,
so
things
like
social
media
and
things
like
that
and
layer
twos
were
a
big
deal.
A
lot
of
people
are
giving
talks
and
you
know
discussing
different
ideas
around
what
can
be
built
on
layer
two
that
just
was
not
able
to
be
built.
D
You
know
with
the
higher
transaction
fees
that
you
see
on
layer
ones,
so
I
think
that
you'll
see
some
interesting
stuff
in
d5
and
in
the
nfc
space
and
then
maybe
composing
together.
Both
in
a
defiant
notes
in
some
interesting
ways
and
yeah-
that's
kind
of
what
I
took
away
from
it,
but
all
the
talks
from
hcc
are
actually
on
youtube.
So
I
would
definitely
recommend
if
you
missed
the
event
to
go
on
youtube
check
out.
Some
of
the
talks
check
out
yaniv
and
eva's
talk
check
out.
A
And
I
I
watched
the
uneven
eva
talk
on
youtube,
it's
about
a
half,
an
hour
presentation
that
they
did
there
and
I
found
that
extremely
insightful.
They
both
shared
the
learnings
that
we've
seen
at
the
graph
in
terms
of
progressive
decentralization,
really
highlighting
that
it
is
a
journey.
It's
not
a
moment
in
time,
but
you
know
it
is
something
that
encompasses
so
many
different
things.
So
it's
a
great
great
watch
there.
So
I
really
recommend
that.
D
Yeah
and
then
one
other
last
talk,
I
would
probably
recommend
is
hadrian,
who
is,
of
course,
with
open,
zeppelin
and
doing
a
lot
of
amazing
stuff
with
nfts
and
also
just
building
out
subgraphs
on
top
of
some
of
the
standards
he
had.
Probably
one
of
my
favorite
talks
there
and
I
think
we
may
have
tweeted
it
out,
but
either
way
it's
on
youtube
as
well.
So
I'd
also
check
that
out
kind
of
talking
about
the
subgraph
framework
or
whatever
that
that
is
that
they've
they
released
a
few
weeks
ago.
A
Very
good,
thank
you,
nada
for
the
update
and
ream,
two
all
right
so
before
we
move
on
to
our
highlight
of
the
day,
which
is
all
about
curation,
let's
check
in
on
the
questions,
so
we
have
two
curation
questions
right
now
and
we're
going
to
be
talking
about
those.
But
let's
take
a
look
at
the
polls
right
now
we
have.
Let
me
do
my
own.
A
A
F
I'm
doing
great,
I
am
excited
to
be
here,
like
you
said
I
I'm
james.
Many
of
you
probably
know
me
as
a
bondsmith.
I've
been
active
in
the
graph
since
about
february
as
a
delegator
and
this
whole
time
kind
of
learning
and
keeping
my
eye
on
curation
and
was
excited,
and
I'm
still
very
excited
about
the
launch
of
it
and
happy
to
be
here,
happy
to
be
invited
and
share,
share
some
thoughts.
G
G
Maybe
a
few
weeks
before
the
mainnet
launch,
I
got
I
found
out
about
the
graph.
I
got
really
excited.
I
was
like
I
should
start
indexing,
but
that
required
some
upfront
capital
and
I
was
like
okay
cool.
In
the
meantime,
I'm
going
to
do
sub
graph
development
and
curation,
and
so
then
I
started
researching
curating
only
to
find
out
that
it
wasn't
yet
launched.
So
then
I
started
going
into
subgraph
development
and
then
a
couple
weeks
later
it
was
launched.
So
I
was
like
great.
E
Yeah
for
sure,
so
I'm
excited
to
see
so
many
curators
here
on
the
call,
by
the
way,
58
of
all
participants
have
some
kind
of
curation
experience.
So
that's
awesome.
It
might
make
a
little
a
few
of
the
points
that
we
are
going
to
talk
about
mood
because
we
are
going
to
give
you
also
some
intro
to
creation,
but
I'm
sure
also
it
is
some
valuable
information.
E
E
So
it
is
a
permissionless
role,
so
anyone
can
become
a
curator
and
they
as
a
curator.
You
would
assess
subgraphs
and
the
value
of
the
data.
They
provide
the
use
cases
and
expected
query
volume
and
if
you
deem
a
subgraph
to
be
under
curated,
you
would
signal
on
that
subgraph
by
depositing
grt
into
a
bonding
curve
and
in
return
which
receive
curation
shares
for
that.
E
So
when
other
curators
curate
on
the
same
or
signal
on
the
same
subgraph,
the
grt
evaluation
of
each
share
will
increase,
and
likewise
when
they,
when
kyoto,
sell
their
shares
or
burn
their
shares,
the
drt
evaluation
of
the
remaining
shares
will
decrease
and
what
this
does
for
the
4d
network?
Why?
This
is
that
it
isn't
just
a
a
a
fun
game
that
we
decided
or
autographed
decided
to
include
in
the
protocol.
E
E
And
then
you
can
curate
yourself
or
have
your
community
curate
on
it,
and
another
important
role
of
the
of
the
bonding
curve
is
that
the
the
creation
market
will
will
act
as
a
load
balancer
or
a
a
predictor
for
it
for
indexers.
So
say
that
wants
to
launch
a
new
feature,
and
that
will
require
a
lot
more
queries
for
for
the
developer,
to
be
confident
that
everything
will
be
smooth
on
opening
day.
E
They
would
otherwise
have
to
like
contact
indexers
ask
them
to
allocate
more
resources,
but
what
the
bonding
curve
ensures
is
that
curators
will
will
pick
up
on
that
new
big
launch,
and
they
will
signal
on
that.
Subgraph
and
indexers
will
then
know
ahead
of
time
that
they
have
to
allocate
more
resources
to
this
particular
dapps
need
so
and
another
thing
a
question.
I
I've
been
asked
quite
a
lot
the
last
few
days.
Why?
Why?
E
E
So
if
you
want
to
be
become
successful,
curators
expect
to
put
it
put
in
a
lot
of
time
and
also
takes
significant,
significant
risk,
because
you
don't
know
what
will
happen
two
or
three
months
down
the
line.
Well,
this
will
the
subgraph
receive
more
queries
or
will
will
will
the
the
project
be?
Maybe
the
project
will
be
overtaken
by
a
competitor?
E
F
F
You
see,
you
know
what
their
apy
is
is
generally
and
you
delegate
to
them,
and
you
can
kind
of
just
set
it
and
forget
it
right
like
you.
Maybe
you
check
in
you
know
once
a
week
once
every
other
week
or
once
every
28
days,
just
to
see
what
your
rewards
are.
Curation's
not
like
that,
so
because
there
are
new
subgraphs
coming
up
all
the
time
and,
furthermore,
you
know
the
the
sub
graph
that
you're
signaling
on
you
know.
F
Like
slim
mentioned
it,
you
know,
maybe
it's
over
signaled,
so
the
signal
might
decrease
in
value.
So
you
really
need
to
keep
your
eye
on
what
you're
doing.
I
think
it
also
requires
that
you
kind
of
know
the
project
that
you're
signaling
on
and
know
you
know.
Are
there
any
changes
coming
up
to
that
project?
You
know.
Are
they
going
to
be
releasing
a
new
version
of
their
sub
graph?
F
You
know,
and
specifically
with
that,
I
know
that
in
these
early
days,
there's
been
some
difficulties
with
very
for
various
reasons,
with
versioning
of
subgraphs
and
some
subgraphs
have
been
deprecated,
which
is
essentially
that
subgraph
being
deemed
invalid
by
the
developer
and
in
those
cases
once
that
subgraph
is
deprecated
if
you're
still
on
it.
If
you
still
have
signal
on
there,
your
share
value
is
going
to
drop
drastically.
F
Now
you
can
still
retrieve
your
grt,
you
you
have
to
use
the
the
graph
proxy
and
if
anybody
out
there
has
signals
still
on
a
deprecated
sub
graph
feel
free
to
reach
out
in
discord,
or
sometimes
I'm
in
telegram
too,
but
more
more
so
in
discord.
I'd
be
happy
to
try
to
help
you
retrieve
your
grt,
so
that
that's
just
you
know
one
aspect
of
the
risk
and
really
it's
about
knowledge.
F
How
how
well
you
know
the
subgraph
that
you're
signaling
on
you
know
what
query
fees
do
you
expect
to
receive,
and
that
really
speaks
to
the
longevity
of
the
subgraph
that
you
are
signaling
on.
If,
for
example,
if
it's
a
subgraph
that
is
unofficial
and
we've
we've
seen,
you
know,
unofficial
subgraphs
deployed.
F
F
So
I
think
it's
really
important
to
to
really
know
the
projects
and
then
to
also
kind
of
know
the
behavior
of
some
of
the
participants
in
curation
there's
people
that
early
signal-
and
that
is
needed,
as
slim
was
kind
of
talking
about.
We
need
that
to
kind
of
bootstrap
the
subgraph
so
that
indexers
know
to
index
it
and
that's
our
job
as
curators
to
say.
Okay,
this
subgraph
is
going
to
have
value,
so
we
put
signal
on
it
so
that
it
can
start
the
syncing
process
and
start
to
process
queries.
F
And
so
we
need
that
that
early
signal,
but
kind
of
a
consequence
of
that
is
there's
these
people
that
have
been
front
running
or
programming
bots
to
get
in
early
and
just
signaling
on
any
subgraph,
and
I
think
it's
important
to
just
know.
You
know
kind
of
where's
your
place
on
the
bonding
curve.
How
early
did
you
signal
who
signaled
before
you?
F
Okay
is
the
is:
is
there
a
a
bot
on
the
subgraph
that
I
have
signaled
on,
and
I
want
to
know
that,
because
I'm,
I
can
be
fairly
assured
that
that
that
wallet
is
going
to
take
profits
at
a
certain
point
and
that's
not
necessarily
a
bad
thing,
because
if
I'm
on
an
official
subgraph
one
that
I
expect
has
long
term
value,
the
the
bot
can
on
signal
and
my
share
value
can
go
down
for
a
week
or
or
whatever.
But
it's
I!
F
A
F
Yeah,
for
me,
I
I
mean,
I
think
that's
our
job
is
we
I
mean
we
are
supposed
to
assess
whether
the
subgraph
is
an
official
subgraph
and
there
are
various
ways
to
do
that.
I
know
derek
data.
Nexus
is
working
on
steps
to
clearly
kind
of
define
how
to
verify
a
subgraph,
so
there's
ways
to
do
it,
and
I
I
I
do
think
that
that
is
the
role
of
the
curator
part
of
the
role.
I
think
that
you
know
there's
there's
more
to
it
than
that,
but
yeah
I'd
also
like.
E
To
add
to
that
thanks,
so
I
would
also
like
to
add
to
that
that
that
is
fair
enough
when
we're
talking
about
a
well-known,
subgraph
or
well-known
dap,
developing
a
subgraph.
But
it
is
important
that
the
graph
is
open
for
also
new
new
dac
developers
that
want
to
deploy
and
a
subgraph
and
curator
on
it.
Themself,
and
it
is
really
hard
to
to
just
have
a
a
a
way
to
do
that
in
a
decentralized
manner.
So.
G
Go
ahead,
and
just
just
to
follow
up
on
that.
So
part
of
the
part
of
the
reason
why
we're
using
the
language
officially
supported,
not
officially
supported,
is
because
a
subgraph
can
still
be
posted
and
actually
have
value
to
where,
even
though
may
not
be
used
by
the
project
itself,
other
other
dapps
and
other
websites
can
go
and
plug
into
that
information.
G
So
if
you
wanted
to
get
some
of
the
latest
information
from
unit
swap,
you
could
go
to
that
subgraph
and
query
it
on
your
own.
Now,
you're
going
to
have
very
different
query
volume
than
uni
swap
is,
but
there
are,
there
are
subgraphs
that
are
that
have
this
as
their
intent,
such
as
the
eip
721,
there's,
not
an
eip721
project
that
is
going
to
be
utilizing
this
in
their
death.
G
That's
a
very
different
topic
than
a
working
sub
graph
that
just
isn't
utilized
or
isn't
incorporated
into
the
dap
itself,
and
so
and
that's
part
of
that's
part
of
our
jobs
as
curators
is
to
understand
whether
or
not
this
is
you
know
with
whether
or
not
it'll
be
utilized
by
the
deaf
and
just
as
an
example.
There
are
some
subgraphs
that
have
been
posted.
G
That
we've
identified
do
not
have
official
support
from
the
project,
but
they
are
receiving
query
volume
and
they
are
generating
query
fees,
so
non
non-officially
supported
subgraphs
can
generate
query
fees
and
it
and
it's
our
job
to
distinguish
which
ones
will
have
high
volume,
which
ones
index
good
projects,
but
are
not
going
to
utilize
the
project
and
then
appropriate
rs
our
signal
accordingly.
That
way,
the
indexers
can
pick
up
on
how
much
indexing
power
something
needs.
F
G
F
It's
very
interesting
if
I
could
add
one
one,
quick
thing
to
that.
I
think
that
you
know
one
of
the
things
that
that
people
are
talking
about
as
a
protocol
improvement
is
the
subgraph
composition.
I
know
that
that's
probably
a
ways
out,
but
that's
something
where
I
think
that
the
value
of
some
of
these
unofficial
subgraphs
could
increase
because
of
the
way
that
they
will
kind
of
link
together.
A
F
Sure
I
can
start
for
me
my
my
thoughts
on
curation
haven't
changed
too
much.
I've
always
seen
it
as
something
that
had
a
lot
of
risk
attached
to
it
and
I
think
it
it
still
does.
I
think
it
also
still
has
a
lot
a
lot
of
reward
and
I
think
we've
seen
that
I
think,
from
a
community
standpoint
kind
of
what
I
was
seeing.
F
You
know
the
first
first
couple
days
like
everybody
was
really
really
excited,
and
then
you
know
some
things
happened,
and
I
think
there
wasn't
quite
an
understanding
that
you
can't
just
I
mean
you
can,
but
it's
risky
to
very
risky
to
just
kind
of
you
know,
as
people
say
ape
in
on
on
your
signal
on
a
subgraph,
and
so
I
think
that
people
kind
of
learned
some
caution
from
the
the
start.
You
know
the
the
initial
extreme
excitement
into
kind
of
this,
oh,
like
we.
F
G
Yeah,
my
my
experience
has
been
largely
the
same.
The
first
few
days
was
just
filled
with
tons
of
excitement,
people
you
know
that
don't
have
a
hundred
thousand
grt
and
their
own
hardware
to
run
indexing
but
wanted
to
be
more
active
and
participate
in
the
protocol,
and
they
were
all
excited
so
we
jumped
into
curation.
G
You
know
of
the.
I
guess,
the
educational
materials
for
understanding
how
to
make
good
and
bad
decisions
is
something
that
we're
still
preparing
and
I'm
working
on
on
some
videos
to
help
with
that.
And
so
you
know,
some
people
got
bit
we're
kind
of
learning
through
trial
and
error
on
what
are
good
decisions.
What
are
bad
decisions?
Things
like
that,
and
so
over
the
last
two
weeks
I
mean
we've.
G
So
I
think
getting
the
the
educational
materials
provided.
I
think
that
will
help
a
lot
with
how
we're
operating
and
also
have
us
look
a
little
bit
more
long-term
on
okay.
So
now
that
a
subgraph
is
generating
query
fees,
how
much
is
it
generating?
How
much
signal
does
it
have,
and
then
you
can
make
you
know
pretty
clear-cut
decisions
based
off
of
where
it's
at
and
whether
or
not
by
predicting
the
market.
You
expect
it
to
grow
or
you
expect
it
to
stay
stagnant
and
then
evaluate
it.
That
way,.
A
G
G
But
you
could
play
the
safer
route
of
specifically
looking
at
the
ones
that
have
active
query
volume.
You
could
play
the
very
risky
route
of.
Let
me
just
you
know.
Let
me
quickly
verify
the
newest
thing
that
gets
posted
and
hopefully
I
get
in
fast
enough
and
and
both
our
roles
that
you
can
play,
but
they
both
have.
You
know
different
risk
profiles
and
everyone's
really
different
on
that
scale.
F
Yeah
for
me,
I
would
just
I
would
say
that
the
way
I
look
at
you
know
whether
it's
short-term
long-term
for
curation,
I
kind
of
look
at
it
as
it's
really,
if
you,
if
you
want
to
be
a
successful
curator,
I
think
that
you
have
to
look
at
it
like
a
part-time
job.
Almost
you
have
to,
I
feel
for
me.
You
know
if
I
wanted
to
be
a
successful
curator,
I
I
want
to
be
constantly
plugged
in
to
the
various
projects
and
their
sub
graphs
and
kind
of
know.
F
A
Yeah
very
good
next
question
is
very
interesting
because
we
haven't
touched
on
that,
yet
it's
really
you're
going
into
the
dynamics
that
the
curator
community
has
with
the
indexer
community.
The
question
is:
how
can
curators
and
indexers
work
better
together
to
support
the
goals
of
the
network?
What
are
your
thoughts.
G
Let
me
let
me
take
this
one,
so
I've
been
I've
been
all
over
the
indexer
channel,
and
this
is
this
is
a
relationship
that
I
really
want
to
stress.
The
curator
community
is
is
very
important
because,
through
our
signal,
we're
gonna
control
in
how
much
indexing
rewards
are
appropriated
to
a
specific
subgraph
now
based
off
of
the
index
or
stake
that'll
determine
how
much
or
what
percentage
of
the
rewards
on
that
subgraph
that
they
will
earn.
G
G
We
can
adjust
our
signal
appropriately
based
off
of
how
much
query
traffic
the
sub
graph
is
pulling
in,
as
as
an
example
I
reached
out
to
someone
this
morning,
and
they
were
talking
about
the
pickle
subgraph,
which
has
some
of
their
largest
query
volume,
and
if
you,
if
you
look
at
the
total
signal
amount
as
of
this
morning,
you
know
based
off
of
how
much
how
much
query
traffic
it
has
to
its
total
signal
in
report
or
in
relation
to
other
subgraphs.
It
was
very
under
signal
and
the
problem
with
that
is.
G
A
G
Just
realize
that
we
don't
necessarily
know
that
quite
yet,
and
we
won't
see
that
in
the
graph
explorer
until
indexers
start
closing
their
allocations.
So
by
letting
us
know
ahead
of
time,
we
can
start
reacting
and
you
know
moving
our
signal
around
to
make
sure
that
everything
is
properly
portioned.
A
Awesome
eric
james.
Thank
you
very
much
for
joining
us
on
this
call
today
and
giving
us.
You
know
insight
into
your
learnings
for
the
first
you
know
few
weeks
I
can
only
recommend,
for
everyone
take
part
in
the
forum
discussions
that
we
have
going
on
there
number
of
posts
there
with
regards
to
ideas
on
how
to
further
enhance
the
curator
experience
and
we're
very
much.
You
know
looking
forward
to
everyone's
participation
there
in
those
discussions,
so
we
can
move
things
along.
A
H
I
was
there
all
weekend
for
better
or
worse
it
was
it
wasn't.
Well,
I
was
helping
organize
it,
so
I
was
setting
up
banners
making
sure
people
are
eating
making
sure
I
I
went
out
for
for
dinner
with
some
folks
on
saturday
night
and
was
talking
to
all
sorts
of
people
about
their
projects
and
making
sure
they
have
the
resources
they
need.
I
was
pinging,
natter
and
and
alex
and
a
bunch
of
people
and
simon
when
somebody
was
having
issues
they
ended
up.
H
Slim
chance
actually
ended
up,
helping
them
out
in
the
discord
server.
So
that
was
very
much
a
great
community
effort
that
to
help
I
think
the
team
was
called
solar,
nft,
I'm
looking
at
it
right
now,
actually
and
yeah.
It
was
a
really
good
weekend.
Just
about
a
good
news
story
for
the
graph
is
natter's
workshop,
which,
if
you
haven't
seen
the
photos
online,
you
totally
should
was
the
the
amphitheater
part
of
this
space.
Descopolitan
voltaire
was
packed.
I
don't.
H
Each
sponsor
upshot
the
graph
getcoin,
sorry,
not
getcoin,
paraswap
and
a
bunch
of
others
all
created
their
own
bounties.
In
addition
to
the
top
prize
money
that
was
available,
the
graph
had
two
bounties.
The
first
one
was
the
graph
dap
challenge.
This
one
was
to
build
a
useful
dapper
tool
that
can
consume
a
sub
graph
innovatively
and
the
submission
requirements
so
that
you
have
to
have
a
demo
dap
that
uses
the
graphql
api
and
it
has
to
be
original
work
of
the
individual
participant
or
the
team.
H
And,
of
course,
thirty
third
party
tech
used
by
the
team
had
to
be
subject
to
valid
perpetual
irrevocable
licenses,
because
we
don't
want
to
trot
on
other
people's
ip.
If
we
don't
need
to
that
got.
I
think
eight
submissions
and
the
other
one,
which
is
the
subgraph
challenge
that
was
to
build
also
looking
for
consuming
a
subgraph
innovatively.
H
This
one
was
slightly
different.
It
don't
think.
Oh,
I
need
indeed
it
needed
a
demo
dab.
It
also
had
to
be
complete,
working
and
deployed
to
the
graph
explorer
and
a
few
other
slightly
different,
and
I
had
to
index
data
from
ethereum
as
well.
So
it
was
slightly
different.
This
one
got
12
submissions,
so
out
of
you
know,
maybe
15
16
teams
working
on
the
weekend,
a
large
majority
of
them
did
utilize
the
graph
in
their
dapps.
H
H
Anybody
who's
written
code
of
any
kind,
even
markup,
will
certainly
empathize
with
banging
your
head
against
against
the
wall,
trying
to
figure
out
what
this
issue
is
and
then
having
being
having
the
issue,
be
something
very,
very
simple
like
that
one
other
one
was
this
team.
I
ended
up
chatting
with
them
just
after
they
finished
and
submitted
their
work
about
this
idea
of
a
decentralized
dao,
centered
or
intended
for
dao's
job
board,
so
basically
a
decentralized
or
hosted
in
a
decentralized
way.
H
Interface
for
badger,
dow
uniswap,
dao,
bankless
dao.
You
know
all
these
dows
that
have
popped
up
over
the
last
little
while
to
post
kind
of
like
what
the
graph
has
with
rfps
post
things
that
need
to
be
done,
especially
if
they're
not
getting
enough
traction
or
they're
not
getting
unsolicited
applications
coming
through
their
own
forum,
their
own
community,
a
place
for
them
to
post
those,
not
cryptocurrencyjobs.com,
not
cryptojobs.com.
H
H
H
Badger
dao,
for
example,
could
be
posting
their
jobs
or
their
open
positions
or
the
work
that
needs
to
be
done
to
this
decentralized
platform
and
then
have
their
own
interface
that
only
ex
exposes
their
the
work
that
they
need
done
or
you
could
have
a
canada,
a
specific
website.
You
know
web
dap
illustrating
those
positions
or
that
sort
of
thing,
so
that
was
really
really
cool
and
then
one
of
the
first
was-
and
this
is
the
last
one
I'll
cover-
was
this
proof
of
proof
of
humanity.
H
Anonymous
voting
system,
which
I
think
was
really
really
innovative.
Basically,
they
figured
out
a
way
to
use
proof
of
humanity,
which
is
a
specific
protocol
and
starkware's
starknet
and
zero
knowledge
snarks
to
vote
and
to
vote
in
a
private
manner,
in
the
sense
that
people
can
still
see
that
you
voted,
which,
for
me
personally,
is
not
a
big
deal,
but
they
can't
actually
see
your
vote.
They
were
one
of
the
top
two
finalists
and
well
deserved.
They
came
into
what.
Actually
I
don't
know
whether
I
shouldn't
say
they.
H
They
were
one
of
the
oh.
No,
we
announced
it
so
they
came
in
second
place
overall.
Ultimately,
so
they
won
a
ton
of
cash
and
potentially
they'll
get
one
of
these
one
of
these
prizes
from
the
graph
as
well.
But
we
saw
some
really
really
cool
work.
We
saw
brand
new
subgraphs
get
created
as
well,
some
airdrops
nfts,
a
subgraph
for
nft
20
and
a
bunch
of
other
stuff.
So
it
was
a
really
really
good
weekend.
A
Great
to
hear
that
level
of
engagement,
wow,
nice,
okay,
we
are
past
time.
Let
me
just
quickly
go
back
to
our
poll
that
we've
had
so
here
we
have
a
recap:
41
people
have
participated
and
mostly
curators
being
part
of
today's
call
no
surprise,
but
we
see
a
lot
of
participation
from
the
other
roads
as
well,
so
that's
great
to
see
because
we
really
want
to
address
every
single
corner
of
the
network.
So
we
have
a
couple
of
questions
we
didn't
get
to
we're
going
to
pick
up
on
those
on
our
next
call.