►
From YouTube: The Graph’s Community Talk #2
Description
The Graph’s Community Talk #2
This video was recorded: Tuesday, August 17 @ 8am PST, 2021.
Sections:
0:00 Intro
3:23 Agenda
16:22 RabbitHole
22:24 Curation
32:22 Mobile Delegation
45:00 Stake Decentralization
The Graph's Media:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/graphprotocol?s=20
Instagram: https://instagram.com/graphprotocol
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/theg...
Website: https://thegraph.com
A
Let's
get
started:
welcome
everyone
to
the
grass
community
talk
number
two.
Today
we
have
a
packed
agenda
and
we're
gonna
start
off
with
community
updates.
We're
gonna
give
you
the
latest
of
what's
been
happening.
You
know
around
our
space
we're
gonna,
hear
from
ben
today
on
the
most
recent
rabbit
hole
campaign
that
we've
had
around
curation
and
also
from
stefan
from
the
graph
academy,
who
has
been
working
on
updates
around
curation
as
well,
since
we've
launched
curation
now
about
six
weeks
ago.
A
He
has
also
been
working
on
updating
his
curation
material
on
the
graph
academy,
and
he
will
show
us
everything
that
he's
got
around
that
talk
about
gip
vips
and
governance,
where
we
are
with
different
discussions
that
includes
curation,
includes
also
stuff
around
delegation
enhancements
and
speaking
of
delegations.
We
have
moonlit
here
today
with
us
who
are
going
to
show
us
quite
something
exciting
around
mobile
delegation
and
our
feature
segment
for
today
is
going
to
be
stake.
Decentralization
gonna
spend
probably
some
30
minutes
on
that
subject.
It's
been
a
topic.
A
That's
been
recently
re-raised
and
been
very
actively
discussed
in
the
forum
as
well,
and
we
will
be
using
slido
today
again
to
get
the
ports
from
the
community
from
everyone
here
on
the
call.
You
know
how
you
feel
around
stake
decentralization
and
we
are
actually
going
to
start
off
our
first
poll
right
now
and
the
question
that
we
want
to
post
is:
what
is
your
position
regarding
the
goal
to
improve
stake
decentralization
at
the
graph?
So
what
is
your
stance
about?
State
decentralization
is
essentially
what
it
boils
down
to.
A
A
A
Let
us
know
go
into
slido.
You
see
the
details
there.
788
841
is
our
meeting
code.
We
want
to
hear
all
about
it
all
right,
but
we're
going
to
start
off
today
with
community
updates
and
we're
actually
going
to
start
with
our
first
bullet
point
here
and
jeremy
is
going
to
bring
us
closer
to
that
subject.
There's
been
a
lot
of
activity
around
the
cryptocurrency
us
regulations,
the
infrastructure
bill
that
was
in
the
senate
and
the
cryptocurrency
amendment
that
was
included
in
there
jeremy.
C
Great
yeah
happy
dude
thanks
oliver,
so
my
name
is
jeremy,
I'm
the
general
counsel
of
edunode
and
I'm
pretty
active
in
the
community,
trying
to
think
about
the
regulatory
landscape
decentralization
and
you
know
how
all
that
interacts
with
the
graph.
So
it's
been
a
very
eventful
few
weeks
on
the
u.s
policy
front,
I'll
give
like
a
very
quick
overview
for
those
who
haven't
been
paying
a
lot
of
attention.
So
there's
been
a
very
long
debate
in
the
us
about
funding
infrastructure.
C
Was
some
language
that
specifically
applied
to
crypto
and
essentially
would
have
designated
a
lot
of
different
types
of
users
and
participants
in
crypto
networks,
as
quote
upon
brokers,
and
those
brokers
would
be
required
to
provide
information
about
their
counterparties
to
the
irs?
The
language
that
was
included
in
this
bill
was
very
broad
and
very
nonsensical,
like,
for
example,
it
included
software
developers
who
you
know
may
not
have
customers
or
know
who
their
customers
are
and
also
you
know,
arguably
included
people
like
miners
on
or
validators
again.
C
You
know
these
people
may
technically
have
counterparties
but
they're,
not
in
a
position
to
know
who
their
counterparties
are,
in
any
case,
the
as
soon
as
the
language
was
detected
by
the
crypto
industry.
You
know
the
whole
industry
mobilized
in
a
really
impressive
way.
There
was
a
week
of
introducing
amendments
to
this
original
language
that
either
would
have
made
the
language
worse
or
better.
You
know,
depending
on
who,
the
author
of
those
amendments
were.
C
Ultimately,
none
of
those
amendments
were
adopted
into
the
final
version
of
the
bill
that
got
passed
in
the
submit.
So
it
was
somewhat
of
a
lost
battle,
but
it's
going
to
be
a
much
longer
campaign
and
you
know
there's
a
lot
of
reasons
to
be
optimistic
about
how
this,
how
this
longer
campaign
is
going
to
go.
So,
first
of
all,
there's
still
a
lot
of
opportunity
to
fight
this
provision.
The
bill
already
passed
the
house.
C
So
you
know
one
thing
that
we
would
really
like
to
see
from
this
community
is
becoming
active
in
that
effort
once
it's
introduced
in
the
house.
So
you
know
for
those
in
the
us.
That
means
calling
your
policymakers
and
you
know,
telling
them
basically
reading
off
a
script
that
signals
your
disapproval
for
this
language
and,
if
you're,
not
in
the
u.s,
just
raising
visibility
in
your
channels
about
how
important
this
you
know
this
potential
language
is
and
how
it
could
affect
crypto.
C
C
But
you
know
as
a
reminder.
The
immediate
short
term
is
kind
of
mounting
this
battle
in
the
house
once
that,
once
that
language
is
introduced
in
the
house,
so
we'll
keep.
You
know
this
community
posted
and
I'm
gonna
provide
some
kind
of
suggestions
and
guidance
on
how
to
get
involved
at
the
right
time.
A
Thank
you,
jeremy.
I
I
agree,
sort
of
like
the
silver
lining
from
what
we've
witnessed
is
you
know,
especially
some
political
figures
in
the
senate
that
have
been
speaking
up
for
more
meaningful
amendments.
The
sort
of
different
knowledge
that
they
showed
they
had
on
this
subject
was
kind
of
impressive
to
see
unexpected
and
definitely
a
positive
sign.
A
E
Right
thanks
oliver
hi
everyone
yeah,
so
we've
partnered
with
emunify
emunify
is
is
the
leading
black
bounty
platform
and
we
did
partner
with
them.
We
want
to
improve
our
inbound.
Let's
say
we
want
to
secure
our
protocol
the
whole
network-
and
this
was
it-
this
turned
out
to
be
one
of
the
largest
or
the
largest
active
bug.
Bounty
program
currently
live,
which
is
pretty
awesome.
E
We
are
securing,
so
we
have
white
hackers
now
working
with
us
and
emunify
as
well,
making
sure
we
have
the
right
people
looking
at
the
code
looking
at
the
smart
contracts,
not
just
not
just
the
solidity
code
like
not
not
only
the
smart
contracts
itself
but,
as
you
know,
we
have
a
lot
of
software
in
our
indexer
stock.
So
we
are.
E
We
don't
want
to
be
on
the
news.
Definitely
so
that's
why
we
are
partnering
up
with
these
white
hackers
to
basically
reward
them
for
finding
bugs
before
others
do
so.
It's
a
large
one
for
critical
bugs
like
freezing
contract
holdings
or
empty
funds
like
the
typical
smart
contract
security
books
like
reentrancy
yeah.
E
We
have
up
to
2.5
million
usd
that's
the
reward,
always
capped
to
10
of
the
total
economic
damages,
but
we
also
have
other
levels
like
we
have
five
different
sort
of
security
levels,
critical
being
the
2.5
million
high
is
200k
medium,
that's
20k
and
the
low
ones
are
like
5k
and,
yes,
you
can.
I
will
link
in
this
chat
the
link
to
our
blog
post.
You
can
read
more
about
it.
You
can
check
emunify's
website.
You
can
check
how
the
rules
are,
what
the
rules
are
really
and
yeah.
E
A
Yeah
you
can
find
the
details
in
the
blog
post
find
out
what
the
program
is
all
about.
What
about
bounty
program
is
in
the
first
place
in
case
you
don't
know
it
yet.
It
really
is
reflective
of
how
serious
we
take
security
at
the
graph
when
you
look
at
just
the
amount
that
we've
posted
for
it
and
that
is
really
for
the
benefit
of
all
network
participants.
A
A
One
of
them
is
the
deployment
signal
feature
that
has
received
broad
support,
but
there
is
a
lot
more
coming
and
a
lot
more
being
discussed
right
now
in
the
forums
as
well.
So
thank
you
to
everyone,
who's
participating
so
actively
in
there,
and
you
know
we're
happy
that
we
were
able
to
also
reward
the
early
curators
of
the
program
by
helping
us
to
move
along
in
this
process
to
make
the
experience
better.
F
C
F
F
Is
basically
a
unit
testing
framework
for
subgraphs?
What
that
means
is
using
matchstick
people
can
test
their
event,
mapping
logic
which,
as
you
know,
if,
if
you
were
to
do
it
right
now,
you
would
have
to
deploy
your
subgraph
wait
for
it
to
sync
and
eventually
check
the
logs
and
see
if
you
can
figure
out
what
the
issue
is
using
that,
but
now
with
matchstick,
you
can
actually
write
unit
tests
and
have
a
sort
of
a
marked
store.
F
So
everything
that
gets
saved
through
the
handlers
gets
saved
in
the
market
store,
and
I
can
link
just
the
link
to
the
repository
and
the
documentation
in
the
chat.
So
everyone
can
see
it.
So
it's
it's
currently
live
in
mvp,
so
everyone
can
feel
free
to
try
it
out
and
give
us
feedback.
We
are
very
eager
to
keep
working
on
that
and
improve
matchstick
with
all
of
your
amazing
feature
requests.
So
that's.
Basically
it.
A
F
A
Thank
you
rebecca
for
the
update
there.
Okay,
that
summarizes
our
community
updates
and
before
we
go
to
the
next
agenda
item
just
want
to
quickly
go
back
to
our
poll
that
we
have
active
right
now.
We've
got,
I
think,
or
just
over
20
responses.
So
please
everyone,
you
know,
go
in
and
give
us
your
feedback
on
your
stance
on
state
decentralization.
A
A
G
And,
of
course
we
we
verify
that
users
actually
complete
their
on-chain
tasks
by
using
none
other
than
the
graph,
and
so
we're
huge
fans
of
the
work
you're
doing
and
we're
really
happy
to
be
able
to
participate
and
create
this
campaign
to
drive
real
measurable
impact
to
the
curators
on
the
graph
network.
And
so
in
tandem
with
the
launch
of
curation.
A
few
weeks
back,
we
launched
the
quest
that
incentivized
people
to
go
and
signal
on
two
different
subgraphs.
G
Instead
of
just
driving
curators
on
a
binary
basis
to
signal
what,
if
we
did
it
more
performance-based
than
it
was,
you
have
to
actually
be
good
at
signaling,
and
so
you
were
rewarded
if
you
are
able
to
create
a
a
certain
amount
of
return
over
a
period
of
time
through
your
signaling
and
and
that
way
we're
we're,
incentivizing,
longer
term
involvement
and
actually
performance
basis.
So
that's
just
one
example
of
an
idea
of
how
rabbit
holograph
could
could
continue
working
together
in
the
future,
but
overall
really
excited
about
the
results.
A
G
Yeah,
I
think
this
was
definitely
one
of
our
most
popular
campaigns
to
date,
especially
for
for
layer,
one
on
layer,
two,
we
we
tend
to
be
able
to
drive
thousands
of
users
just
because
the
transaction
fees
are
much
lower,
but
in
terms
of
high
quality
transactions
that
you
know,
do
have
a
significant
cost.
When
you're
going
to
signal
on
the
sub
graph
and
do
require
a
bit
of
skill
and
being
crypto
native
and
understanding
what
you're
doing.
I
think
we
were
certainly
blown
blown
away
by
these.
G
These
results,
and-
and
as
I
mentioned,
we
were
not
planning
on
having
the
the
quest
be.
This
large,
I
believe
the
the
original
quest
design
had
a
thousand
redeemers,
but
the
rewards
went
so
quickly
that,
working
with
with
the
team,
the
team
being
flexible
and
and
seeing
the
success,
we're
having
what
was
we're
able
to
to
add
additional
rewards
to
to
our
campaign
so
that
we
could
keep
it
open
to
more
people.
So
I
we
were.
A
Okay,
let's
move
on
and
we
stay
with
the
topic
of
curation.
We
all
know
the
graph
academy
and
stefan
is
going
to
show
us
today
what
he
has
got
in
terms
of
contents
that
covers
curation
and
all
the
new
stuff
that
he's
done.
So
I'm
going
to
stop
sharing
here
and
hand
over
control
to
stefan
stefan
welcome
and
take
it
away.
H
H
So
this
is
why
we
have
created
this
curator
knowledge
hub
to
get
curators
onboarded
with
curation,
with
the
theory
behind
curation,
and
we
literally
start
from
zero
with
questions
such
as
what
is
a
curator.
What
is
curation
in
general,
and
we
also
address,
for
example,
the
risks
of
being
a
curator,
and
you
can
find
this
curated
knowledge
hub
simply
by
navigating
to
the
graph.academy
curators
or
simply
the
graph
academy
and
hovering
over
the
resources
page
and
navigating
to
the
curator
hub,
and
we
can,
for
example,
start
with
what
is
a
curator.
H
Here
is
an
article
describing
everything
you
need
to
know
as
a
curator
in
the
network
we
describe
what
curation
is
and
the
specific
requirements
you
need
as
a
curator
in
the
graph
network,
from
the
technical
skills
to
the
time,
investment,
the
required
funds
and
the
risk
level,
and
we
address,
for
example,
what
kind
of
subgraphs
are
available,
what
subgraphs
are
and
yeah?
That's
that's,
basically
an
introduction
to
curation.
So
if
you
haven't
checked
it
out
check
out
this
this
resource
page,
it's
especially
great
if
you
haven't
been
active
in
curation.
H
H
So
it
could
mean
that
the
share
of
your
duration
at
the
value
of
your
creation
shares
can
increase
substantially,
but
it
can
also
decrease
substantially
and
there
are
other
risks
you
should
be
aware
of
so
be
sure
to
have
a
look
at
them.
We
also
have
a
detailed
risk
assessment
over
there
at
the
website,
which
goes
into
more
detail
about
all
the
risks.
So
you
can
learn
more
about
the
risks
and
learn
more
why
these
risks
are
important
to
keep
in
mind.
H
So
we
give
you
a
great
overview
about
bonding
curves.
We
explain
to
you
how
bonding
curves
function,
how
they
work,
so
that
you
can
understand
the
mechanisms
behind
them
and
also
that
you
can
understand,
for
example,
when
your
curation
value
or
your
creation
shares,
go
up
in
value
and
if
they
decrease
in
value,
so
that
you
understand
the
basic
theoretical
idea
behind
these
bonding
curves.
H
We
have
many
diagrams
to
basically
explain
the
theory
behind
it.
So,
to
give
you
a
better
understanding
of
the
bonding
curves,
then
we
take
a
small
excursion
with
another
article
about
the
cryptoeconomic
primitives
that
explain,
cryptoeconomic,
primitives
and
how
they
are
used
in
the
graph
ecosystem.
H
So
data
nexus
is
really
important
topics
and
addresses
the
importance
of
verifying
the
subgraph
before
you
curate
on
it,
and
he
has
also
written
a
very
detailed
article
about
what
you
can
do
to
verify
a
subgraph
and
to
see
if
it
is
legit
or
not,
and
he
goes
into
very
much
detail
into
three
steps.
You
can
follow
how
to
verify
a
subgraph,
for
example,
in
getting
touch
with
the
development
team
asking
them
hey.
Is
this
subgraph
from
you
and
is
it
legit,
and
you
can
also
see
another
step
that
he
goes
into
detail?
H
A
Thank
you.
Stefan.
It
connects
really
well
with
what
we
heard
before
with
the
rabbit
hole
campaign
right.
We
have
one
and
a
half
thousand
new
curators,
and
some
of
them
might
have
experienced
curation,
but
don't
know
everything
about
it
yet
so
anyone
listening
from
that
cohort
go
to
the
graph
academy
and
you
have
the
chance
to
really
get
intimate
knowledge
about
the
curation.
It
is
definitely
associated
with
higher
risks.
A
H
Exactly
no
problem,
and
what
I
wanted
to
mention
is
for
example,
if
you
have
ideas
for
accountant,
you
can
always
reach
out
to
us
and
let
us
know
where
you
would
like
to
see
new
content,
and
we
will
definitely
see
what
is
possible
to
provide
that
kind
of
content.
For
example,
if
you
want
to
have
a
video
walkthrough
of
everything,
you
need
to
know
to
become
a
curator,
every
click
you
need
to
make
on
the
network
page.
H
We
will
be
happy
to
supply
this
kind
of
video
material
or
written
content,
so
just
feel
free
to
ping
us
in
the
official
graph
server
or
in
the
server
discord
server
of
the
graph
academy,
and
we
will
be
more
than
happy
to
provide
this
content.
If
you
have
any
content
suggestions
so
feel
free
to
reach
out.
We
are
always
happy
to
talk
with
you
and
we
are
more
than
thankful.
If
you
have
content
suggestions
for
us.
A
And
I'm
gonna
start
sharing
again
there
you
go
okay,
that
was
the
graph
academy.
So
as
far
as
governance
updates
is
concerned,
for
the
sake
of
time,
I
want
to
have
make
sure
that
we
have
enough
time
to
talk
about
state
decentralization.
I
want
to
keep
this
fairly
short.
There
are
active
discussions
going
on,
I
would
say
the
most
active
one
right
now
is
around
dynamic,
curation
tags,
or
we
have
a
new
proposal
out
there.
A
D
So,
hey
guys,
thanks
for
having
me
really
excited
to
demo
today,
mullet
together
with
my
colleague
george
I'm
going
to
have
just
a
quick
intro,
because
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
allow
george
to
show
you
practically
what
we
built
in
the
last
couple
of
months.
So
we
are.
We
are
mullet,
a
non-custodial
wallet
operator,
as
well
as
an
old
operator,
we're
activating
in
the
blockchain
ecosystem
for
quite
a
while.
D
Just
to
have
a
rough
idea
about
current
status
of
moonet,
we
have
around
55
000
installs
over
40
000,
active
users,
20
000
delegations
to
all
our
active
nodes
and
close
to
30.
Right
now
the
market
actually
increased
and
I
believe
we
are
above
30
million
usd
dollars
as
assets
delegated
to
all
our
nodes.
And
hopefully,
what
we
build
now
will
help
the
graph
the
network
to
pass
the
knowledge
to
our
current
user
base,
as
well
as
for
mullet
to
increase
the
visibility
of
our
products.
D
I
I
I
For
now,
I
will
take
a
very
small
amount
to
do
that
in
case
the
user
has
wants
to
take
a
very
small
amount.
We
will
display
him
on
a
note
that
the
fees
might
be
higher
than
the
actual
stake.
We
will
let
him
sign
the
transactions,
but
we
we
will
tell
tell
them
that
he
might
exceed
the
the
fees
with
with
the
staking
for
this.
I
For
staking
there.
There
needs
to
be
two
transactions
to
increase
allowance
for
gertie's
taking
token
and
the
actual
stake
user
has
to
enter
the
pin
of
his
wallet
and
both
transactional
are
sent
to
blockchain
and
signed
and
sent
just
a
second
to
stay.
To
send
the
stake
as
well
user
can
continue
and
he
will
see
the
the
staking.
I
I
I
I
And
send
and
basically
that's
it
and
these
transactions
are
sent
to
blockchain.
The
increased
transaction
is
already
confirmed.
The
stake
takes
usually
a
little
bit
longer
user
will
be
able
to
see
the
transaction
history
here,
details
about
it
about
the
transactions,
as
I
said,
staking,
takes
a
little
bit
longer.
I
I
guess
I
think
it's
done
yep,
so
user
has
take
one
zero
grt
and
as
well
as
on
hd
wallet,
you
can
see
the
the
all
his
takes
and
I'm
using
the
same
private
keys.
So
basically
the
hd
wallet
and
ledger
has
has
the
same
addresses
and
some
other
information
about
rewards
about
next
cycle.
When
the
the
next
network
cycle
start
will
start
and
pretty
much.
A
I
D
Yeah,
which
industry
performs
better
than
others,
so
basically
the
target
was
to
launch
this
this
week,
but
it
depends
on
many
things,
but
what
you
were
able
to
see
was
a
production
demo.
So
this
is
a
production
environment.
We
are
almost
there.
There
are
a
few
things
that
we
need
to
clarify,
but
yeah
yeah
we
have
to
see
george.
Are
we
able
to
show
also
the
dynamic
links?
Yes,
of
course,
could
you
please
show
us
the
last
part
of
the
demo
exactly
so.
D
I
I
D
E
E
I
don't
think
we
mentioned
this,
but
moonlight
is
also
a
wave
one
grantee
and,
as
we've
been
saying,
these
grinds
are
always
open.
I
will
leave
the
link
in
the
shot
as
well
feel
free
to
submit
your
ideas,
your
proposals,
whatever
you
think
you
can
build,
that's
and
that
adds
value
to
the
whole
ecosystem
and
our
network
feel
free
to
apply
as
well.
E
A
A
Okay,
let
me
start
share
my
screen
again
and
let's
move
on
to
our
feature
segment
for
today,
which
is
state
decentralization.
So
I
want
to
start
by
checking
in
on
the
results
that
we've
seen
here
they
are.
So
what
is
your
position
regarding
the
goal
to
improve
stake?
Decentralization
majority
says
somewhat
supportive,
11
out
of
23.
So
that's
about
half
that
say
essentially
you
know
I
I
support
it,
but
I
may
not
be
actively
contributing
to
state
decentralization
and
we
have
10
that
are
highly
supported
that
are
already
actively
taking
part
of
that.
A
So
very
interesting
as
we
gonna
start
with
that
subject,
we
are
going
to
ask
you
the
next
poll
question,
and
that
is
we
want
to
understand
how
you,
when
you
delegate
and
it's
a
nice
segue
from
what
we've
seen
mobile
delegation
coming
into
play
here
now
too,
select
all
the
criteria
that
play
a
role
in
your
delegation
decision
making
process
in
order
from
high
to
low.
So
you
can
select
as
many
as
you
like.
You
can
select
only
one
if
that's
really
what
you
do
today.
A
If
you
say,
I
only
look
at
high
index
or
state
and
that's
the
criteria
that
I
use,
or
I
only
use
the
referral
I
received
by
others-
you
can
select
one
or
you
can
select
multiple
if
you
take
more
things
into
consideration,
select
them
in
the
order
that
is
most
important
to
you
from
high
to
low.
So
we're
going
to
check
back
into
that
poll
here
later
on.
A
A
What
I
learned
once
I
started
engaging
more
deeply
with
the
graph
was
that
decentralization
is
not
just
exclusive
to
the
technology
or
infrastructure,
but
is
rather
an
overarching
theme,
a
philosophy
that
touches
so
many
different
aspects
of
everything
that
we
do.
It
extends
to
voting
where
every
network
participant
should
feel
that
their
vote
counts.
A
Extensive
protocol
code
that
is
available
to
everyone
as
open
source
to
governance,
discussions
where
everyone's
voice
should
matter
and
also
to
the
ecosystem
and
community
to
be
open,
accessible
and
inviting
to
all
people,
regardless
of
their
background,
and
it
also
extends
to
how
our
grt
stake
in
the
network
is
distributed
across
our
indexer
base.
That
includes,
essentially
the
self
stake
by
indexers
plus
the
delegations.
They
have
the.
A
A
Well
then,
we
would
be
back
to
where
google
is
today
right,
controlling
everything
being
the
central
and
single
point
of
failure
and
having
full
concentration
of
power
and
control,
that's
the
opposite
of
where
we
want
to
go
so
chris
highlighted
in
his
grt
iq
podcast,
which
is
really
insightful.
I
highly
recommend
this
as
an
area
of
concern.
A
A
In
other
words,
the
other
145
have
less
than
50
percent.
My
immediate
takeaway
from
that
is
that
that
is
not
a
roughly
even
distribution.
Right
now
it
looks
a
little
bit
more
centralized,
so
we
have
a
forum
post
now
on
that
subject.
Many
people
have
decided
to
participate
in
those
discussions,
and
I
want
to
highlight
gary
morris
here,
who
is
one
of
our
council
members
at
the
graph.
A
So
it
was
a
good
opportunity
to
bring
that
back
to
the
community
again
and
I'm
happy
to
see
how
the
discussions
have
evolved,
how
the
community
has
matured
in
these
discussions,
where
I
feel
we
are
really
talking
about
it
as
a
community
in
a
much
more
productive
way
and
that
discussion
I
want
to
bring
here
to
the
community
talk.
Today
we
have
a
number
of
folks
from
the
community
that
are
going
to
be
part
in
these
discussions
from
different
corners
of
the
network
and
I'm
going
to
bring
them
in
one
by
one.
A
I
want
to
start
with
chris
ewing,
chris
ewing
is
an
admin
in
the
graphtronauts
channel
that
we
heard
about
earlier,
and
they
actually
did
also
a
poll,
a
survey
that
they
have
received
quite
a
bit
of
feedback
on
with
regards
to
how
important
their
cohort
in
the
telegram
channel
thinks
about
state
decentralization,
which
is
which
can
be
viewed
more
of
a
delegator
feedback.
So
chris
welcome
to
the
discussions.
A
B
B
B
More
education
would
be
required
to
explain
to
people
the
importance
of
this
and
why
it
is
why
it's
essential
for
the
way
the
protocol
functions
within
the
community.
It's
not
something
that
was
a
big
discussion
point
until
chris
remus
interview
and
I
think
that
kind
of
got
the
the
wheels
turning
for
people
and
it's
one
of
those
things.
That's
in
the
background,
and
you
don't
think
about
it
very
much,
but
when
you
actually
sit
down
and
look
at
it
it
it
really.
B
I
believe
constantine
touched
on
this
in
his
interview
a
couple
months
ago
and
just
he
said
you
know
with
being
a
large
indexer.
He
said
our
our
choices
are
and
our
decisions
are
magnified.
He
said
if
we
make
a
mistake
it
it,
it
shows
up
a
whole
lot
more
than
if
somebody
else
does
so
the
the
incentive
there
would
be
to
not
make
a
mistake,
but
still
that's
it's
just
one
of
the
the
dangers
and
responsibilities
actually
of
being
a
larger
indexer
within
the
community.
A
Yeah,
your
mistakes
are
more
unforgiving
right
in
many
ways.
I
posted
in
the
forum
that
you
know
when
a
smaller
index
makes
a
mistake.
The
rest
of
the
network
may
hardly
notice,
but
if
a
larger
index
or
sneezes
you
know,
then
smaller
indexers
may
catch
a
cold.
So
we
have
constantine
here
with
us
too,
from
p2p
one
of
our
larger
indexers
and
highly
active
in
the
community
as
well.
Who's
decided
to
join
this
conversation
you're
also
very
active
in
the
forum.
A
J
Yeah
actually,
as
I
yeah
as
I
said
before,
we
are
totally
agree
that
gesturization
is
pretty
important
thing
and,
as
chris
also
mentioned
on
the
jrtv
podcast,
we
talked
about
being
a
like
bigger
indexer.
Here,
it's
not
our
goal
and
we
actually
didn't
start
any
like
marketing
campaign
for
attract
people
and
even
now,
if
someone
asked
us
about
like,
could
you
recommend
some
good
indexer?
We
don't
recommend
join
to
us.
J
J
A
You
have
been
actively
influencing
the
opinions
of
the
audience
here
today.
We
see
indexer
activity
in
the
graph
community
becoming
a
more
prominent
criteria
in
the
decision-making
process,
so
you're
doing
a
great
job
and
you
do
bring
up
a
great
point.
You
know
on
the
way
you
you
post
it
when
you
know
the
criticism
around
state.
Decentralization
is
don't
just
stick.
You
know
to
you,
know
large
indexers.
A
The
same
can
be
said
with
the
sort
of
stake,
decentralization
approach
to
say
just
simply
go
to
small
indexers.
You
don't
want
to
do
either.
One
of
those.
I
think
what
the
key
message
is
here.
You
know
there
is
a
sort
of
process
that
we
recommend,
which
is
to
get
to
know
your
index,
or
we
have
a
series
on
that
in
the
forum
as
well,
and
you
know
check
on
the
indexer
in
terms
of
how
they
engage
within
the
community.
A
We
want
to
promote
the
ones
that
are
actively
engaged
and
help
the
community,
and
then
you
know
if
you
find
to
have
a
short
list
of
indexers,
you're,
10
or
20,
that
you
think
you
know
they
are
all
good
ones
after
you
verified
that.
I
think
at
that
point
you
know,
is
where
stake
decentralization
fits
in.
It's
just
an
additional
criteria.
After
that
I
really
appreciate
your
point.
You
know,
being
active
in
the
community
is
something
extremely
important.
I
think
that's
what
you
continue
making
and
it's
I
find
it
100
valid.
A
A
K
That
you
have
on
that
subject
as
well
sure
thanks
oliver,
so
I'm
always
a
big
believer
in
you
know.
You
got
a
stick
or
carrots.
How
are
you
going
to
get
people
to
act
in
the
way
that
you
want
them
to
behave?
I
think
the
carrots
is
generally
kind
of
the
reward
versus
the
punishment
is
generally
the
way
that
most
people
tend
to
react
and
engage
better
on
a
long-term
basis.
K
So
I
think
the
more
carrots
that
we
can
find
the
more
influence
we
can
have
on
people
to
act
in
a
way
that
we
as
a
community
would
like
them
to
act
based
on
our
ideals
that
we
set
up
based
on
our
governance
and
also
to
keep
them
around
and
engaged
longer
term.
I
think
there's
a
concept
called
nudge,
where
we
don't
explicitly
tell
people
what
it
is
we
want
to
do,
but
we
give
them
the
the
ideal
that
this
is
how
people
here
are
behaving.
K
A
famous
example
is
that
in
places
where
taxes
are
hard
to
collect,
they'll
send
out
the
letter
saying
hey,
you
owe
these
taxes.
Please
pay
them
within
this
amount
of
time
and
then
they
made
a
switch.
They
said,
hey,
you
owe
these
taxes
and
we
find
that
most
people
tend
to
pay
them.
You
know
over
the
next
three
months
or
six
months
after
being
notified
of
that
and
the
fact
that
people
said.
Oh
most
people
tend
to
do
this.
K
Then
they
kind
of
fall
in
line
because
there's
a
self
motivation
I
want
to
be
part
of
the
herd.
I
want
to
be
part
of
the
group
and
I
don't
want
to
feel
like
an
outsider,
so
the
more
that
we
can
get
people
to
self-motivate
to
want
to
see
in
a
self-decentralized
community.
If
that's
the
idea
that
we
want
to
promote,
then
self-motivation
will
help
to
drive
that
I
mean
the
the
classic
example.
That's
we
keep
bringing
up
is
staking
facility;
they
have
on
solana,
cycled
solana,
beach,
which
is
a
really
really
great
job.
K
At
saying
of
all
of
the
validators
of
solana,
the
the
33
33
of
the
stake
is
controlled
by
these
top.
I
think
right
now
it's
like
17
validators.
I
might
be
wrong
the
exact
number
they
they
basically
hide
those
top
17
and
say
hey,
consider
delegating
towards
the
validators
that
are
below
this
level
to
promote
state
decentralization.
K
So
they're,
not
saying
hey,
you
can't
go
17.,
they're
they're,
just
trying
to
promote
the
ideal
that
the
community
would
like
to
see.
So
I'm
always
of
the
opinion
that
the
more
that
we
can
promote
the
ideal,
the
better
off
will
be
because
then,
as
new
people
join
they're
going
to
get
that
message
rather
than
hey,
don't
do
this
because
it's
bad
for
whatever
hey!
Let's
do
this,
because
it's
good
that's
more
the
messaging.
I
think
we
should
try
to
focus
on.
A
And
I
think
it's
a
great
message:
incentivization
typically
works
better
than
punishments,
so
those
those
are
great
thoughts
and
really
what
should
cover
and
how
we
should
approach
this
subject.
So
we
have
forum
post
it's
about
improving
stake,
decentralization
for
those
of
you,
we've
not
seen
it
yet.
I
highly
recommend
joining
those
discussions.
A
A
What
do
you
think
about
state
decentralization
in
terms
of
how
this
discussion
has
influenced
your
future
delegation
decision
making
process?
So
I'm
going
to
give
it
just
about
10
seconds
to
let
everyone
respond
to
that
on
slido,
so
we
can
get
a
quick
pulse
from
the
community
here.
Let's
take
a
look
at
at
the
results
positively
10
times
unchanged:
twice,
not
contrarian,
that's
good!
So
I'm
happy
that
it
has
contributed
to
a
sort
of
positive
view
on
state
decentralization,
and
I
look
forward
to
continue
the
discussions
you
know
on
that
subject.
It
is
highly
important.
A
This
is
a
moment
in
time
where
we
can
have
the
discussions
around
what
about
the
next
three
billion
that
we
will
see
coming
in
as
stake
in
the
network.
How
can
we
contribute
to
be
that
more
meaningfully
decentralized?
That's
the
sort
of
spirit
with
which
we
want
to
approach
that,
and
I
look
forward
to
everyone's
contributions
on
that
subject.