►
From YouTube: GraphiQL Working Group - 2023-01-10
Description
GraphQL is a query language for APIs and a runtime for fulfilling those queries with your existing data. GraphQL provides a complete and understandable description of the data in your API, gives clients the power to ask for exactly what they need and nothing more, makes it easier to evolve APIs over time, and enables powerful developer tools. Get Started Here: https://graphql.org/
A
A
B
B
Worries
you're
still
cutting
your
videos
cutting
out
a
little
bit.
If
you
want
to
drop
off
videos
to
make
your
audio
better.
That's
that's
yeah.
B
A
B
So
I
was
I
was
hoping
that
we'd
have
some
more
folks
on
today,
so
that
we
could
talk
about.
You
know
how
we
wanted
to
structure
the
working
group,
for
you
know
for
the
year.
Basically,.
B
It's
a
bummer:
where
is
everybody
so
I
guess
we
could
just
do
it
on
our
own.
B
Like
I,
have
this
sort
of
feeling
I,
don't
I
can't
be
the
only
one.
That's
feeling
this
way
that
just
general
enthusiasm
for
the
project
has
started
to
I
started
to
dip.
B
You
know
since,
like
so
and
I
wonder
if
we've
talked
about
this
before
we
talked
about
going
to
the
the
larger
working
group
and
and
asking
them
for
I,
don't
know,
support
I
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
how
to
attention
I'm,
not
sure
exactly
like
how
that
works
with
you
know
everyone,
that's
in
the
that's
in
the
working
group,
but
maybe
we
should
do
that
for
real
I.
Don't
know
exactly
what
the
process
is
like,
but
there's
there's
still
loads
of
work
to
be
done
on
graphical
right,
I!
B
Think
we've
we've
got.
We
still
have
ambitious
plans
for
for
Monaco
and
for
the
query
built
operation,
Builder
and
whatnot
and
I.
You
know
you
and
I
together
are
a
strong
team,
but
I
don't
think
we
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
it's
enough.
You
know
hours
I,
don't
think
it's
enough
butts
and
seats
to
really
get
it
done.
The
way
that
I
think
it
deserves
to
be
done.
How
do
you
feel.
A
I
think
it's
a
question
of
like
also
a
question
of
timing.
I
mean
how
can
we
we
can
go
or
we
can
probably
get
it
done
just
with
the
two
of
us.
It
will
just
take
us
longer,
right
and
honestly,
I
think.
A
If
that's
how
it
is,
then
it's
also
fine.
If
there's
a
particular
group
of
folks
who's
very
interested
in,
be
it
Monaco
or
the
operation
Builder
foreign,
and
they
want
to
get
it
done
quicker,
and
it's
for
them
to
step
in
I
mean
we
I.
B
A
Like
we
are
very
welcoming
and
trying
to
give
everybody
a
chance
to
to
come
in
and
participate,
which
is
something
we
should,
of
course
continue
to
do.
A
B
Yeah,
that's
I,
that's
that's
the
right
way
to
look
at
it.
I
think
that's
very
intelligent
and
smart
and
just
honest
and
fair
and
everything
so
an
update
with
me.
I
joined
graph
base,
I
started
yesterday
and
so
awesome
congrats
yeah.
Thank
you
it's.
It's
awesome
very
exciting,
good
team,
good
people,
smart
people,
cool
product
super
into
it
and
they're
they're.
B
You
know
like
stellate
their
Foundation
members,
so
yeah
like
I,
said
I
just
started
yesterday
and
we
haven't
had
a
chance
to
work
out
what
my
time
split
is
gonna,
be
like
exactly
so.
I
don't
have
like
a
firm
commitment
in
terms
of
like
graph
based
hours
that
I'll
be
able
to
feed
back
in.
You
know
directly
into
graphical,
but
certainly
in
my
own
time,
I
at
least
plan
on
continuing
to
pay
attention,
help
on
the
Discord
design,
efforts,
design,
efforts,
I.
B
Think
for
me
is
probably
like
you
know,
and
it's
been
this
way
for
like
the
last
two
months
or
so,
where
I
just
really
haven't
like
spent
a
lot
of
time
on
the
on
the
operation
Builder,
but
certainly
the
rest
of
it.
At
least.
Maintenance
is
something
that
I'm
still
committed
to
with
graphical,
so
yeah.
A
Yeah
I
honestly
mean
that's,
that's
probably
always
the
most
important
part
like
keeping
the
things
running
that
we
have
so,
but
I
mean
it's
probably
going
to
be
similar
for
me.
I
couldn't
tell
in
advance
previously
also
like
how
my
workout's
gonna
be
the
last
time.
I
really
had
time
to
invest
a
significant
efforts
into
graphical
was
funny,
but
instead
allowed
me
to
as
part
of
my
work
and
outside
of
that
I'm.
A
Also
just
gonna
see
that
I
can
yeah
from
time
to
time,
make
make
up
an
hour
or
two
to
jump
in
and
see.
What's
going
on,
trying
to
like
resolve
any
kind
of
issues
or
or
bucks
or
whatever
it
may
be,
and
you
know
we're
also
loved
to
to
do
more,
but.
B
Yeah
yeah,
no
no
I
I
share
the
sentiment.
I
would
love
to
be
able
to.
You
know,
throw
as
much
time
into
as
as
both
you
did
and
I
did.
You
know
in
the
first
half
of
2022.
B
You
know
you
spent
you
spent
a
load
of
time
and
I
spent.
You
know
quite
a
bit
of
time.
It's
just
not
it's
just
not
feasible.
You
know
now
that
I'm
now
that
I'm
back
to
the
full
time
that
said
I
I
do
have
a
question
about
so,
let's
just
you
know
quick
recap.
B
This
is
very
simple,
like
the
big
stuff
that
we
want
to
deliver
was
going
to
be
Monaco
and
the
operation
Builder
and
then
sort
of
like
the
third
thing,
the
third
tent
poll
there
was
the
plug-in
API
that
everybody
was
really
it
still
is
really
enthusiastic
about
it.
Just
doesn't
have
the
time
to
dedicate
to
it.
B
So
if
we
take
those
those
three
things
that
we
had
identified
have
identified
for
the
last
yeah
six
months
or
so,
particularly
as
you
know,
the
next
steps-
I
don't
personally
nor
does
graph
base
so
far
as
I
can
tell
have
any
reason
to
make
either
of
any
of
those
three
things
extremely
high
priorities.
B
That's
you
know
that
seems
clear
to
me.
That's
delayed
does.
Is
there
a
need
in
the
coming
quarters
for
you
folks
to
really
like
to
require
any
of
those
three
things?
How
are
you
guys
fit
for
this.
A
I
think
the
the
thing
which
would
maybe
be
most
or
which
kind
of
blocks
us
in
a
sense
is
that
we're
trying
to
or
we're
trying
to
work
on
weight,
limiting
and
also
trying
to
do
like
complexity,
analysis
for
for
graphical
operations
and
trying
to
show
that
right
inside
of
inside
of
Graphica,
and
now
the
question
is
kind
of
or
like
if
we
would
have
Monaco
you,
which
has
like
very
nice
apis
for
directly
showing
these
kind
of
pills.
A
Inside
of
the
the
editor
where
you
can
show
things
that
would
probably
be
like
the
the
most
value
we
could
get
out
of
it
in
the
coming
months,
which
is
something
we
just
started
thinking
about
again.
So
it's
not
not
really
concrete
I'd
say,
might
be
more
concrete
if
we
like,
until
we
have
the
next
working
group
meeting
in
in
February
I,
don't
know
yet
yeah.
A
But
apart
from
that,
it's
again
like
nothing
stands
out
which
would
make
any
of
the
three
high
priority
for
us
at
the
moment.
Okay,.
B
So
I
remember
back
in
October
when
doc
was
on
the
call
and
Tim
was
on
the
call
from
from
Postman
yeah,
the
two
of
them
both
seemed
very
interested
and
saw
a
lot
of
value
in
Monaco
and
the
plug-in
API
I
haven't
yeah
I
haven't
caught
up
with
them,
so
I,
don't
this
is
the
same
as
last
month.
I
have
the
same
update
as
last
month.
B
You
know,
like
I,
think
this
is
the
same
thing
that
you
and
I
talked
about
a
month
ago,
like
I'm,
not
totally
sure
where
they
are
in
their
Discovery
process.
With
with
those
things
so
I
mean
my
assumption.
Is
that
they've
they
don't
have
the
resources
to
dedicate
to
Monaco
like
at
least
right
and
I'm
gonna
be
totally
Frank
I
made
it
I
I've
attempted
to
shove
Monaco
into
the
current
version
of
graphical.
It
is
it's
not
easy.
It's
not!
B
It's,
not
a
it's,
not
a
simple
thing
to
do
so.
I,
I'm,
fully
understanding
of
like
the
the
the
time
requirement
and
able
to
to
get
that
done.
That's
not
going
to
change!
B
If
we
get
the
smartest
engineer
in
the
world
to
work
on
this
problem
like
it,
doesn't
really
have
anything
to
do
with
you
know
it's
not
it's
not
it's
just
a
it's
a
hurdle.
It's
it's
just
time
hurdle
it
doesn't.
None
of
us
are
going
to
be
able
to
like
take
a
week
and
bang
the
thing
out.
It's
just
not
going
to
work
that
way.
So
I
wonder
if.
A
Would
probably
need
some
way
to
like
the
thing
that
I'm
lacking
here
I
mean
you've
worked
a
way
more
on
this
than
than
I
have
I
I.
Rarely
looked
into
my
neck
at
all
the
thing
that
I'm
missing
is
kind
of
like
a
way
to
break
down
what
would
be
like
the
the
steps
which
are
actually
small,
which
you
can
actually
get
done
in,
like
a
small
amount
of
time.
Just
to
somehow
like
get
to
the
point
where
it's
ready.
That's
the
thing
that
I'm
mostly
missing.
B
Trying
to
think
back
there's
no,
there
isn't
it's
very
difficult
to
slice
that
work
up
into
like
manageable
schedulable
chunks,
because
it
touches
every
piece
of
the
graphical
ecosystem.
You
know
like
it
touches
the
react.
Props
that
go
in
it
touches
multiple
contexts.
It
touches
the
UI
like
it's
all.
You
know,
I
mean
it's
a
it's
a
really
it's
a
core
piece,
and
so
slicing
it
up
is
is
hard
because
you,
you
gotta
rip
out
code,
mirror
whole
hog
and
replace
it
with
with
Monaco
right.
That's
the
way
that
I
did.
It
was
I.
B
Just
did
it
whole
hog
and
then
I
slowly
worked
through
ensuring
that
the
functionality
provided
by
Monaco
was
sort
of.
You
know
in
parity
with
what
was
provided
by
code
mirror,
but
you
very
quickly
hit
a
wall
there
where
they're,
not
the
same.
You
there's
just
fundamental
differences
to
the
way
that
they
behave.
B
That
makes
it
really
difficult
to
like
to
to
layer
them
together
in
any
sort
of
way,
and
we've
talked
about
this
before,
like
we
talked
about
this
with
Patrick
in
regards
to
the
you
know,
the
plug-in
API
and
with
Ricky
about
well,
maybe
we
can
offer
both
like
a
dual
setup
like
you
can
pass
in
a
prop
and
you
can
choose
which,
whether
you
want
code
mirror,
whether
you
want
Monaco,
but
that
we've
all
already
agreed
that
that's
literally
having
two
completely
separate
systems,
so
I
I
think
that
I
think
that
there
might
be
a
lot
of
value
Thomas
in
if
Monaco
is
important
for
you.
A
B
We
can,
this
is
all
very
early
I
started
yesterday,
so
I
can't
make
any
commitments
here,
but
I
think
if
we
can
agree
together
and
try
to
come
up
with
some
kind
of
a
plan
to
to
work
on.
You
know
to
actually
like
to
work
on
it
together
to
get
time
dedicated
to
it.
That
could
be
very
helpful
and
there's
I
know
you
guys
have
some
new
folks
graph
base
has
some
new
folk
or
so
has
some.
You
know,
front-end
Engineers
that
could
potentially
I
mean
I.
B
Think
that
there's
a
way
for
us
to
get
it
done.
If
we,
you
know
now
that
there's,
like
you,
know
two
fighters
in
the
ring,
maybe
probably
we
can
do
it
without
having
to
rely
on
you
know,
like
you
know,
you
know,
I,
don't
want
to
say
outside
people,
but
like
new
contributors
coming
in
and
doing
like
little
chunks
of
work.
Maybe
we
can
just
figure
out
a
way
to
schedule
it
so
that
we
knock
it
out.
I
think
February,
the
beginning
of
February.
B
We
have
this
meeting
in
the
month
is
probably
when
we
can
begin
to
like
discuss
details
of
that.
We
have
a
lot
more
knowledge
at
graph
Bays.
We
use
graphical
2.0
right,
so
we're
running
2.0
with
a
custom
theme
seems
to
work
really
well,
I,
don't
know
if
you've
used
the
product,
if
you
haven't,
you
should
sign
up
for
one
of
the
private
data
accounts
and
just
play
with
the
playground.
B
You
know
just
so
you
can
see
the
way
that
graphical
is
is
used
in
in
graph
base,
because
it's
a
little
bit
different
from
the
way
that
you
guys
do
it
at
still
late,
but
we're
we're
keen
on
making
it
better
and
making
it
better
at
graph
base
could
mean
contributing
back
to
graphical,
right
and
and
making
graphical
work.
It
could
also
mean
we
just
build
our
own
if
we
decide
to
build
our
own,
there's
still
lots
of
stuff
in
there
that
could
be
fed
back
into
graphical
I.
B
Just
don't
know
what
that
breakdown
looks
like
yet
you
know
I,
don't
I,
can't
I
haven't
done
the
design
for
what
we're
doing
at
graph
base.
So
I
don't
know
what
that
looks
like,
but
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
potential
here
to
grab
this
thing
and
make
a
plan
and
like
get
you
know
like
and
get
it
done
and
I
know
that
like
there's,
y'all
have
plans
and
we're
gonna
have
plans
and
we're
gonna
have
needs
and
you're
gonna
have
needs,
but
I
think
that
I
think
that
we
can.
B
You
know
we
can
certainly
feed
back
into
at
least
the
Monaco
stuff,
because
it's
really
important,
you
know
and
I
think
a
lot
of
people
are
going
to
want
to
we're
going
to
want
to
get
get
upgraded
once
that,
once
it
gets
integrated
into
it.
A
Yeah
this
makes
sense,
I
mean,
let's,
let's
try
to
do
exactly
that:
let's
try
to
somehow
come
up
with
to
break
it
down
somehow
to
get
to
a
point
where
we
have
manageable
chunks
of
work,
which
we
can
then
hopefully
get
done
over
some
period
of
time.
Let's
see
how
much
it
is.
B
Yeah
I'm,
looking
at
open
issues
right
now
for
Monaco
graphql
I
want
to
try
to
I,
haven't
I
haven't
done,
I
haven't
looked
at
the
repository
for
like
a
month.
It's
been,
it
was
a
long
December
for
me,
so
I
haven't
really
been
in
here,
but
I'm
I'm
interested
in
seeing
from
my
personal
experience.
B
Monaco
graphql
is
in
a
pretty
great
state
like
it's
good,
but
I,
don't
know
I,
don't
I,
don't
have
a
Target
in
my
hand,
so
I
can't
say
like
in
terms
of
completion
where
it
is
so
I'm
just
trying
to
find
open
issues.
So
here
we
go.
B
Okay,
so
there
are
a
lot
of
issues
open,
there's
16
open
for
Monaco
graphql,
but
none
of
them
seem
first
of
all,
none
of
them
seem
fully
insurmountable
and,
second
of
all,
I,
don't
know
how
haven't
ranked
these
right.
I,
don't
know
how
critical
these
are
going
to
be
for
getting
I,
don't
know
how
bored
they're
going
to
be
for
getting
them
into
actual
graphical,
so
I
I
think
Monaco
graphql
is
in
a
great
state.
B
I
I
was
having
some
issues
with
in
the
Prototype
the
worker
set
up
right.
That's
one
of
the
big
changes
is
the
the
web
workers,
and
so
there
was
non-critical
errors
throughout,
like
my
time
with
the
prototype
in
reference
to
Monaco
graphql.
Again,
none
of
them
were
like
breaking
just
console
errors,
mostly
that
will
probably
need
to
get
cleaned
up,
so
yeah
I
think
we're
winning
we're
gonna
and
we're
gonna
we're
in
a
good
place
with
Monaco
graphql
I.
B
Don't
know,
I
haven't
heard
from
Ricky
in
a
few
weeks,
I
checked
in
earlier
in
December,
just
to
say
hello
and
see
how
they
were
doing
and
like
like
all
of
us.
It's
been
holidays
and
we
haven't.
You
know
it's
just
been
pretty
quiet
around
the
Discord,
so
I
don't
know
what
the
with
the
commitment
plan
from
them
is
going
to
be
for,
for
you
know
the
the
non-ui
bits
of
the
graphical
Repository,
but
the
base
is
really
solid
here.
B
We
just
need
to
you
know,
come
together,
so
I
guess,
let's
say
like
in
February
I
will
make
a
commitment
to
showing
up
to
this
meeting
in
February
with
a
at
least
a
punch
list
of
some
kind
of
a
schedule,
or
some
kind
of
a
plan
with
more
approachable
tasks
for
us
to
tackle
going
forward.
B
I
imagine
by
then
they'll
also
be
some
design
thinking
that
I
will
have
done
in
my
time
at
graph
base
to
figure
out
exactly
what
the
what
the
strategy
is
going
to
be
there
so
I'll
commit
to
coming
in
coming
back
in
a
month
and
having
you
know
more
than
just
words
and
talkitalki.
A
Yeah
I
can
also
like
I'll,
also
clarify
what
stellate
would
benefit
from
in
terms
of
getting
Monaco
ready
and
yeah.
I
I
will
take
a
more
extensive
look
into
work
with
graphql
because,
as
I
said,
I
haven't
touched.
It
really
and
that
hopefully,
will
get
us
into
a
position
where
that
we
can
make
more
concrete,
submits
in
February.
B
B
I
would
like
to
I
would
have
liked
you
back
then
I
wish
I
would
have
been
more
aware
of
what
was
going
on
and
being
more
available
to
participate,
because
I
really
would
have
loved
to
get
a
better
sense
of
the
IDE
spread
and
now
I
know
that
these
surveys
are
they're,
not
they're,
not
super
accurate,
but
it
would
be
real
nice
to
understand
I.
B
You
know
what
the
take-up
rate
is
for
for
for
graphical
and
and
who's
on,
who
went
to
you
know
Apollo,
sandbox
and
who's
using
banana
cake
pop
and
who's
using
insomnia,
and,
like
all
of
that
stuff
I
think,
would
help
me
anyway.
Sort
of
like
just
understand
the
effort
that
we
should
be
putting
into
graphical
as
an
open
source
reference,
and
so
I
want
to
just
mention
that
to
you
that
you
know
like
the
next
time.
B
This
comes
up
I
plan
on
participating,
more
and
trying
to
get
in
more
questions
around
the
IDE
situation.
Specifically
because
we're
you
know
I
mean
just
based,
like
you
know,
the
way
that
we
started
this
conversation
today
was
like
I
feels
like
the
enthusiasm
is
like
going
down
a
little
bit.
B
It
feels
like
it's
it's
a
lot
less
than
it
was
at
the
beginning
of
the
year
and
I
I
wonder
if
the
enthusiasm
early
in
the
year
was
folks
that
foreign
opinions
but
weren't
actually
using
graphical
right
that
had
already
moved
on
or
if
something
happened
that
has
since
the
beginning
of
2022,
when
the
enthusiasm
was
high,
if
there
was
something
that
was
done,
that
encouraged
them
to
not
want
to
participate.
So
this
is
just
something
that
I'm
going
to
start
paying
a
little
bit
more
attention
to,
because
it's
it's
not
gonna.
B
Do
you
know
anybody
any
good?
If
we're
not
just
paying
attention
to
the
community-
and
that's
not
on
us
like
it's,
not
us
to
go
out
and
solicit
this
information,
it's
for
everybody
to
come
in
and
participate
if
they
want
to,
if
it's
valuable
for
them,
but
I
think
a
little
bit
of
insight
here
would
be
very
helpful
and
again.
I
wish
we
would
have
I
would
have
like
thought
about
this
when
the
survey
was
getting
done,
I
wish
I
would
have
like
been
able
to
participate
more.
B
So
that's
the
last
thing
I
just
wanted
to
mention
is
I
wanted
to
try
to
gather
more
information
from
the
community
about
this,
because
it
seems
like
the
way
that
I'm
thinking
about
it
and
have
been
thinking
about
it
throughout
2022
was
a
lot
different
than
you
know.
The
Baseline
for
the
community.
A
Yeah,
that's
a
good
call,
I
mean
I.
I
also
think
the
the
survey
is
probably
a
bit
biased
because
only
a
subset
of,
like
all
graphical
users
actually
take
part,
but
it's
certainly
it's
indeed
good
to
get
like
a
pulse
on
the
state
of
things,
so
something
we
could
also
yeah.
But
wait
like
you
said
that
makes
sense
to
keep
an
eye
on
that
and
also
try
to
actively
contribute,
if
possible.
B
A
B
Me
neither
I
I
appreciate
you.
You
know
you
showing
up
today
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
our
meeting
in
February
and
working
together
more
closely.