►
From YouTube: Groton Conservation Commission 06/01/20
Description
Groton, Connecticut municipal meeting: Groton Conservation Commission - June 1, 2020. To view the agendas click on the links below:
https://www.agendasuite.org/iip/groton/meeting/details/692
A
B
A
D
C
D
A
C
A
A
I
said,
let
me
ask
them
such
as
somebody
we
can
talk
to
to
you'll,
see
the
note
something
that
we
could
kind
of
resolve
the
difference.
I
think
it's
definitional,
obviously
what's
in
or
not,
but
that
was
the
we'll
talk
about
that
later.
We're
off
about
two
percent
to
about
two
percent.
Almost
three
percent
well,.
C
A
C
D
C
But
but
it
didn't
had
didn't
the
data
set,
but
they
gave
us
and
Tom
explained
how
they
decided.
What
was
included
in
there
was
based
on
properties.
People
could
walk
on
or
do
things
on
so
the
majority
of
the
stuff
that
we
care
about.
That's
not
necessarily
true.
So
none
of
the
stuff
that
people
aren't
allowed
on
was
on
in
the
data
set
and
so
I
had
to
find
it
by
comparing
this
one
map
that
was
in
the
POC
D.
Well,.
C
I
have
one
suggestion
before
you
do
that
when
you,
when
you
put
people
on
visual
that
are
that,
are
the
guests
when
they're
done
talking,
can
you
shut
down
their
visual
so
we're
not
watching
them?
You
know
trying
to
listen,
but
not
listen
like
wanting
around
their
kitchen
or
whatever
you
know
say.
Yes,.
C
B
B
Just
that
this
is
the
Conservation
Commission.
On
the
June
1st
meeting.
There
are
the
of
the
write,
the
regular
meeting
for
the
conservation.
This
is
taken,
obviously
through
zoom.
The
way
we
take
public
comments
is
during
the
public
communications
portion
of
the
agenda
attendees,
which
I
have
now
promoted
all
the
panelists.
If
anyone
would
like
to
speak
to
make
any
comments,
the
Chairman
will
ask
and
just
raise
your
hand
and
I
will
on
you.
B
You
and
you'll
be
able
to
speak
as
we
go
through
the
agenda
items
the
chairman
may,
at
its
discretion,
sometimes
allow
other
public
communications.
So
if
anyone
would
like
to
speak
on
any
other
items,
just
raise
your
hand,
and
we
can
call
on
you
it's
appropriate
at
that
time,
other
than
that
I'll
leave
it
to
you,
Larry
to.
A
Yes,
very
good.
Okay,
all
right!
Thank
you
all
right!
We're
set
for
the
roll
call.
So
as
of
right
now
we
have
myself
as
chairman,
we
have
Tom
Olsen
and
Schmidt
Kristen
de
Santa,
a
Michele
Fitzpatrick,
and
that
represents
the
Commission
to
date.
Let's
see
if
we
get
a
couple
of
late
comers
joined,
I'd
like
to
recognize
and
say,
say:
hi
to
Andre
who's
joining
us
is
from
the
town
council.
So
if
you
want
to
throw
something
in
Andre
can
always
raise
your
hand
we'll
be
happy
to
recognize
you.
D
A
H
A
A
H
A
A
A
B
Yes,
that's
correct
gun.
This
is
Bruce
offering
from
planning
and
development
services.
I
did
reach
out
to
mark
berry.
If
you,
if
you
all
remember
from
the
last
meeting,
we
had
a
conversation
about
you
know.
Sometimes
there
are
suspicious
activity
occurring
in
some
of
these
trail
heads.
None
chose
Pequot
woods,
but
really
all
over
town,
and
we
thought
that
you.
B
A
A
A
One
that
mean
does
that
help
that
helps
okay,
all
right
I'm
here
to
help
okay.
So
this
is
what
I've
been
doing
is
as
we
did
this
at
the
beginning
of
the
year.
It's
kind
of
shrinking
us
things
become
promoted
if
you
will-
and
so
the
first
item
was
really
getting
more
collaboration
with
the
other
jurisdictions
and
municipalities,
etc.
A
They're
around
so
I
think
the
myth
major
event
we'll
talk
about
on
the
plan
and
we've
got
that
coming
up
in
terms
of
who
the
reviewers
are
going
to
be
for
the
the
plan,
so
I'll
defer
that
for
a
second,
is
there
any
other
items?
I
just
quickly
go
to
the
list
outside
of
the
conservation
plan
review
that
any
of
you
would
like
to
mention.
I
guess:
I'll
start
with
the
city
of
Groton
Michelle.
A
A
A
A
We
wanted
to
be
proactive
and
not
to
let
it
accidentally
happen,
but
I
haven't
actually
consider
it
and
that's
where
they
came
out
on
that.
That's
a
trade
management
tree
advisory
responsibilities.
We
are
putting
that
in
the
future
stewardship
section,
so
I
think
I
could
probably
delete
that
going
forward
and
impact
of
climate
change
on
coastal
land
use,
and
it
was
there
that
was
one
of
the
ones.
You
were
interested
in
right.
H
And
I
think
last
time,
I
was
requesting
that
what
I
wanted
to
do
is
get
feedback
on
kind
of
a
summary
list
of
what
I
have,
and
you
had
mentioned
that
this
was
in
relation
to
the
open
space
plan
right.
So
a
lot
of
it
is
probably
in
there
to
a
certain
degree,
but
basically
I
have
like
three
different
kind
of
categories:
general
climate
change
impacts
and
then
impacts
on
different.
Well,
let
me
just
go
through
them.
H
Insect-Borne
diseases
and
increased
stress
ecosystems,
so
just
kind
of
summarizing
those
things
and
then
they
impact
on
coastal
ecosystems,
so
kind
of
putting
it
in
terms
of
infrastructure,
the
actual
coastal
ecosystem,
water
quality,
wastewater
management
impact
on
human
health
and
economy,
and
then
the
third
section
would
be
a
mitigation
adaptation
strategies
that
are
possible
for
exactly
the
same
categories:
infrastructure,
coastal
ecosystem,
water
quality,
wastewater
management,
human
health
economy
and
then
adding
an
education
component
on
all
these
effects.
Widths
in
the
schools
and
with
the
public
in
multi
different
areas.
H
H
Is
right,
Tom,
Tom,
News,
yeah,
I
think
there's
some
and
some
of
this
isn't
not
always
related
to
open
space,
but
some
of
it.
What
I
could
do?
What
I
thought
I
would
do
is
expand
on
this
and
send
it
to
the
I
guess
the
text
team
and
then
we
can
see
if
there's
any
additional
elements
from
what
I
have
that
we
want
to
include
in
the
open
space
plan.
Does
that
make
sense.
D
A
H
G
I've
attended
a
couple
of
the
December
one
in
there
and
then
there
may
there
am
a
meeting
and
the
team.
They
have
a
separate
agenda
of
things
that
they're
working
on.
If
there's
something
that
we
feel
that
we
need
to
be
going
above
and
beyond,
they
have
a
very
structured
assumptions
that
they
are
working
with,
because
they're
more
interested
in
the
resiliency
to
the
not
just
the
factors
of
climate
change.
They
accept
time
a
change
in
the
inning,
they
said
we're
gonna
get.
G
You
know,
you
know
20s
or
whatever
the
number
is
coastal
flooding
and,
for
example,
okay,
so
there
they
are
well,
they
have.
They
are
working,
two
specific
factors
and
effects
on
the
town
and
then
they're,
looking
at
what
how
the
infrastructure
needs
to
react
to
that,
rather
than
you
know
what
things
the
town
can
do
to
mitigate
the
factors
they're
just
looking
at.
How
do
I
I'm
gonna
assume
that
I'm
gonna
get
this
stuff
coming
across
the
water
is
going
to
come.
The
heats
gonna
come
as
far
as,
rather
than
trying
it
at
this
time.
G
It
but
I
just
don't
know
if
they're,
if
there's
gonna,
be
much
affected
with
that
relative
to
actions
that
would
really
need
to
be
coordinated
with
them,
so
pretend
I
would
be
recommending
some
type
of
a
white
paper
or
something
that
we
would
as
the
Conservation
Commission
say,
hey
here's!
What
we
think
we
can
be
done
from
a
town
perspective,
so
being
both
us
and
the
resiliency.
We
are
we're.
G
We
are
only
advisory
committees
to
the
task
force
and
Commission
to
the
town
council,
but
these
are
the
actions
that
we
would
recommend
that
the
town
be
taking
from
a
sustainability
impact
of
climate
change
actions,
probably
a
better
way
to
do
it,
rather
than
forcing
ourselves
into
just
sticking
with
the
with
the
open
space
plan
itself.
I
think:
okay,
we
acknowledge
the
open
space,
but
that's
we
put
it
into
Omo
space
plan
in
regard
to
what
we're
buying
and
what
we're
maintaining
from
open
space
perspective.
G
So
we
have
that
background
information
in
the
in
our
plan
as
a
referencing
point
of
view,
but
I
think
from
an
act
from
from
up
from
the
action
plan
for
the
2020
action
plan.
I
think
we
should
be
looking
more
at
a
white
paper.
As
far
as
on
what
actions
we
would
be
recommending
to
can
coordinate
with
the
resiliency
task
force
for
action
by
the
town.
A
All
right,
thanks,
Ann
I,
think
the
one
item
that
we
had
in
there.
It's
in
our
actions
in
the
plan
is
the
protection
of
the
space
that
will
become
marshland
with
E
with
the
rise
I.
Think
that's
one.
One
action
item
that
I
think
is
appropriate.
It's
already
in
there,
so
you're
right,
the
rest
of
it
does
become
a
little
bit
different
approach.
H
When
I
was
doing
some
research
on
that,
I
went
to
the
Nature
Conservancy
site
and
they
have
actually
from
their
coastal
resilience.
Org
I
think
it's
the
website.
They
have
actually
pin
pointed
down
to
the
parcel
numbers
which
parcels
would
be.
They
are
designated
at
different
levels
like
critical
parcels
for
marsh
and
so
in
potential
future
marsh
areas
that
should
be
protected.
So
I
can
put
that
together
for
the
data
team,
the
parcel
team
to
look
at
it's
just
something
that
we
should
keep
on
the
radar
that'd.
A
That
would
that
would
be
good,
because
I
I
thought
we
had
the
general
map.
But
if
you
got
it
by
parcel
and
there's
not
that
many
of
them,
because
we
got
kind
of
rocky
coast
but
but
so
I
think,
would
be
manageable
if
you
will
just
destroy
the
town
of
grad
1
so
that
that's
a
pup
that'd
be
a
good,
a
good
input.
Yeah.
D
E
E
A
Right
in
terms
of
the
stewardship
so
Brian-
oh,
that
was
that
was
yours,
but
we
we
agreed
at
the
last
meeting
or
the
meeting
before
last,
of
having
a
follow
on
document
target
in
2020.
One
that's
focused
on
stewardship,
so
is
that
we
want
to
keep
that
this
item
you'll
kind
of
wrap
that
into
that
twenty
twenty
one
objective
I
would.
I
Agree
with
that,
I
want
to
apologize
for
being
late,
but
it
turns
out
that
my
operating
server
wouldn't
allow
me
to
join
your
meeting
and
then
it
also
said
that
I
needed
to
download
the
new
upgrade,
and
so
that
took
another
5-10
minutes.
Then
I
had
to
go
to
another
other
way
to
get
in,
because
there
was
no
initial
email.
That
said,
you
click
on
and
automatically
came
up,
so
I
had
to
go
to
the
town
site,
to
figure
it
out
how
to
to
join
you.
A
B
Yes
and
the
only
update
I
have
on
that
is
we
haven't
really
Oh,
as
you
all
know,
we're
bronze
certified.
Now
we
got
bronze
certification
last
year.
There
is
a
silver
certification.
They
don't
have
a
gold
certification
yet,
but
we
haven't
seriously
considered
if
we're
gonna
go
for
solar
this
year
or
not.
B
There
is
a
few
interns
that
are
gonna
work
at
our
Council
of
Governments
and
they
have
reached
out
to
me
to
see
if
they
can
help
the
only
problem
with
sustainable
Connecticut
is
there's
a
lot
of
there's
a
lot
of
activities
that
involve.
You
know
a
lot
of
group
events
and
things
like
that.
So
I'm
not
really
sure
how
other
towns
are
kind
of
incorporating.
You
know
activities
with
all
the
the
Cova
19
restrictions,
but
it's
something
we're
gonna
try
to
look
into
over
the
summer
and
hopefully
we
can
get.
B
A
B
A
C
A
C
The
the
task
force
meets
this
month.
We
meet
quarterly,
so
this
month
is
the
next
meeting.
I
would
I
would
recommend
that
we
add
them
to
the
list
of
people
to
distribute
the
plan
to
for
review
now.
Most
people
on
the
task
force
are
also
on
some
of
the
other
groups
that
we
are
already
playing,
distribute
it,
but
I
think
we
should
specifically
saying
I
kind
of
promised
them
this
anyway.
I'm
specifically
include
you'll.
Give
two
to
mark
the
you
know.
A
Right
hold
that
thought:
we're
gonna,
that's
a
specific
topic
coming
up
yep
and
the
other
item
is
the
sealy
school
property.
Although
there's
been
some
communication
with
some
local
property
owners
around
that
to
to
or
to
me
for
you
and
we're,
basically
I
won't
say
trading
water,
but
we're
waiting
for
I,
guess
the
next.
The
next
drop
of
information
on
that
project,
so
I,
don't
have
anything
new
to
report
other
than
we're
trying
to
keep
on
top
of
that
to
see
how
we
can
I
guess,
participate
and
provide
input
as
as
needed,
I
say.
A
B
C
A
A
Alright,
so
I
think
we
had
two
whoops.
That
was,
we
had
a
couple
of
memos
we're
going
to
do
in
support
and
I
think
this
was
out
so
I
I
would
trust
that
the
members
of
the
Commission
had
a
chance
to
look.
Look
at
these
and
I
think
what
we're
gonna
need
is
two
different
I
probably
should
bring
it
up
from
the
agenda
item.
D
A
G
Is
Tom
Olsen?
Yes,
my
only
comment
to
the
to
the
Eastern
Connecticut
one
in
regard
to
the
their
support
was
they
mentioned
that
the
words
in
here
regardless
project
proposal
to
in
the
at
the
bottom
of
the
last
line
of
the
first
paragraph?
Was
this
project
proposals
partnering
with
town's
residents,
business
and
small
regards
to
the
high
priority
areas?
G
Pawprint
pathways
in
the
Tri
Town
area
is
a
great
way
to
improve
water
quality
and
increasing
importance
of
habitat
as
a
reader,
not
familiar
with
this
terminology
of
try
town
area
I'm
a
little
concerned
that
we
should
probably
spell
it
out
or
whatever
saying?
Is
this
New
London
Prime
in
Stonington,
or
is
it
Groton
ledger?
Preston,
yeah,
I.
E
D
G
G
A
A
B
B
A
H
H
D
G
B
B
D
B
So
so
this
is
a
grant
application
that
I
have
been
working
on.
So
this
is
what
we
want
to
do.
We've
identified
several
areas
in
town
that
you
know
are
susceptible
to
sea
level
rise
and
one
of
the
areas
was
downtown
mystic.
So
originally
you
want
to
do
a
plan
for
the
entire
town,
but
we
chose
to
focus
just
on
downtown
mystic
this
time.
B
So
what
this
is
going
to
be
is
is
going
to
be
looking
at
previous
studies
that
were
in
downtown
and
also
compiling
new
data
to
try
to
put
together
a
plan
that
they're
really,
you
know
prioritizes
what
needs
to
be
done
to
make
Morris's
sustainable
and
resilient
mystic
we're
hoping
to
incorporate
a
lot
of
business
input
into
this.
We,
you
know
a
lot
of
times
when
you
read
these
type
of
sustainability
plans.
B
You
know
where
we
see
pseudo
or
as
going,
and
how
do
we
see
it's
affecting
their
specific
properties?
So
how
do
we
figure
that
out
a
lot
of
studying
a
lot
of
mapping
a
lot
of
public
meetings?
We're
gonna
have
series
of
meetings
on
that
and
you
know
we're
looking
to
hire
our
consulting
firm
and
it
should
start.
B
Hopefully,
you
know
by
this
time
next
year,
if
we
are
recei,
if
we
do
receive
the
grant,
but
it's
not
I'm,
not
sure
if
we're
gonna
get
the
grant
or
not
because
he
usually
Long
Island
Sound
futures.
Their
top
priority
is
more
pollution
reduction,
habit,
restoration,
but
the
city
of
Groton
did
apply
for
a
grant
very
similar
to
this
one
last
year
and
they
did
receive
it.
So
we're
doing
our
best
to
try
to
try
to
also
get
some
funds,
because
it's
really
something
important
that
we
need
to
start
planning
for.
B
E
E
G
G
This
is
a
separate
yeah,
basically
the
other
side
of
the
town,
and
you
know
maybe
some
statement
into
that
in
regard
to
says
hey,
you
did
a
similar
thing
last
time
is
to
remind
them
and
that
this
is
a
different
part
of
the
town
and
it's
a
different
entity
that
they're
going
to
be
supporting
I
used
to
know
if
that
would
help
the
so
I'm.
Listening
to
your
discussion
here
to
refer
to,
you
know
refresh
their
point
of
view
on
it.
Also
so.
A
B
That's
correct
in
yeah,
Tom
I
think
that
that
would
be
a
good
addition
to
this,
just
to
put
that
in
there
and
remind
them,
but
yes,
I'm,
hoping
that
you
would
support
this.
You
sign
it
and
I
will
be
finalizing
the
grant
application
tomorrow
and
the
pollinator
one
will.
Just
if
you,
if
you
support
that
one,
we
will
email
that
out
to
Maura
and
I'm
sure
she's
applying
tomorrow.
A
There
discussion
all
right
call
for
a
vote.
All
those
in
favor,
because
ands
up
I
see
a
unanimous
support
for
both
letters.
So
Bruce
I
will
get
both
of
these
sign
tonight
and
get
it
to
you,
or
at
least
this
one
to
you
and
I'll
send
the
other
one
out
to
Maura
so
that
she
can
prosecute
as
well
all
right.
That
was
easy
enough.
All
right
now
we're
into
the
the
meat
of
this
meeting,
which
is
the
conservation
plan
update.
So.
C
A
Right
I
apologize,
I
talked
about
that
and
I
didn't
all
right.
So
where
that
is,
is
that
there's?
There
was
a
session
last
week
where
there
was
a
presentation
of
the
staff
homework?
If
you
will
for
the
options
for
the
knowing
school
parcel.
I
had
gotten
a
preliminary
copy
of
that,
and
as
a
result
of
that,
I
revised
our
memo
and
added
it
to
that
staff
document
and
basically
was
what
we
agreed
to
before
and
I
just
changed
the
numbers
in
the
model
because
they
changed
the
numbers
in
the
model
or
they
changed.
A
A
G
D
G
A
D
A
Let's
call
it
the
not
single-family
but
more
a
highly
dense
one.
The
net
of
that
and
I'll
just
sit
down
here.
It
said
it
didn't,
really
change.
Our
recommendation.
I
updated
these
numbers
here
when
you
look
plus
or
minus
given
degree
of
accuracy
that
we've
got
it's
kind
of
like
guys,
there's
no
major
economic
advantage
to
the
town.
One
way
or
another
I
mean
if
you're
talking
thirty
two
thousand
year
versus
thirty
eight
thousand
a
year.
A
So
it
it
seemed
unlikely
to
me
that
somebody's
going
to
spend
seven
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
buy
the
land,
another
million
and
a
half
to
develop
the
land
then
go
on
spec
to
build.
You
know
five
million
dollars
worth
of
houses
to
go,
sell
in
an
area
that
it's
way
above
the
surrounding
homes
and
houses.
Now
that
that
becomes
a
decision
for
the
council,
that's
just
my
own
personal
observation,
so
my
intent
was
to
present
information
in
terms
of
what
I
would
call
the
best
tax
I
can
and
then
add
some
of
my
personal
observations.
A
You
know
on
that
weekend.
What
I
just
said
you
know
in
the
meeting
to
say:
Burt,
my
video
is
a
burden,
a
hand,
I
mean
you
you,
you
know
what
you
can
do
with.
You
know
an
open
space,
it
does
have
value
and
it
does
have
additional
considerations
that
it's
tough
to
put
a
monetary
value
on
that's
what
a
head
down
here
and
so
I
would
put
that.
The
other
thing
that
has
happened
on
the
knowing
one
is
I
was
asked
by.
A
Rachel
Franco
one
of
the
town
council
people
about
the
value
of
having
ball
fields
there.
You
know
her
her
view
is
that
that
that
we
can
make
money
on
the
ball
fields.
I
I
tried
to
come
up
with
a
business
case
on
that,
and
you
know
the
best
I
could
do
and
I
kind
of
exchanged
back.
There
is
a
somewhere
between
you
know,
forty
thousand
and
a
million
dollars
you
could
spend
on
building
a
ball
field,
but
best
cases
I
said,
maybe
be
two
three
thousand
dollars
benefits
at
the
town.
A
If
you
put
in
a
modest
ball
field,
because
it's
not
an
area
that
you
can
run
tournaments
or
anything
else
because
of
limited
parking.
The
fact
that
you
can't
put
lights
there-
or
at
least
my
assumption
from
my
time
on
the
knowing
Zoning
Commission,
is
that
we
wouldn't
support
lights
there.
But
again
this
was
my
personal
opinion,
so
there
wasn't
a
lot.
You
could
add
into
that.
You
know.
Maybe
you
could
add
another
couple
of
grand
to
the
thirty
to
make
it
thirty.
A
Four,
but
again
you
know
within
the
the
margin
of
error,
so
it
didn't
substantially
change
anything.
The
next
session
on
that
I
believe
is:
there's
a
June
ninth
session,
where
it
will
be
discussed
and,
as
mentioned
earlier,
I
did
get
an
invite
to
speak
at
that
and
I
just
that
came
in
actually
today
to
provide
some
verbalization
of
the
input
from
us.
G
A
So
I'm
thinking
get
me
your
input
now
or
before
the
meeting
and
I'll
put
it
in
there
just
make
it
easier
to
do
it's
little
tougher
to
do
in
the
zoom
format.
So
that
would
be
my
request,
other
than
like
I
said
that
the
things
that
we'd
done
this
a
couple
of
times
already
so
like
I,
said:
there's
not
a
lot
of
new
information
other
than
the
modest
update
that
I
just
went
over
with
you.
I
E
Another
thing
to
look
as
just
look
at
the
population:
demographics.
You
know
this
area
is
sort
of
an
older
skewing
community
and
if
you
look
globally
at
the
demographics
of
the
ball
field,
age,
child
demographic
is
in
steep
decline.
Right
now,
and
so
you
may
be
building
a
lot
of
ball
fields
for
a
cohort
that
is
really
gonna,
be
a
minimal
I
mean
I,
think
you
should
really
analyze
the
ten
demographics
and
see
if
that's
a
good
way
to
invest
town
money,
especially
something
that's
gonna,
get
locked
in.
E
A
I
Knowing
lots
of
folks
who
had
it's
growing
up
through
that
are
young
college
now,
but
there
was
always
a
very
difficult
time
having
ball
fields.
One
ball
field
that
is
now
gone
is
called
Cutler
right
now
it's
a
big
hole
in
the
ground
for
a
new
school.
So
as
as
things
change
and
morph
around
the
nulling
school
property
may
still
have
value
to
it,
because
it's
now
an
open
place
and
and
well
it's
accessible
and
lots
of
positive
is
about
it.
G
G
That
specific
question
regard
to
athletic
courts:
basketball,
tennis,
soccer
baseball
football-
you
know
specifically
talked
about
in
here
and
I-
didn't
know
if
they
have
some
preliminary
results
from
that
through
Parks
and
Rec
said,
you
may
want
to
just
kind
of
reference
to
says:
hey
you're
off
doing
a
survey
on
this
stuff.
As
far
as
on
what
that
demand
is,
do
they
have
any
kind
of
input
already
back
in
Butte?
You
know
pass
it
off
to
that
way
to
see
what
the
town
needs
are
relative
to.
The
survey
results.
A
I'll,
certainly
ask
is
like
if
I
was
spending
money,
I'd
kind
of
extend
the
Pequannock
Park
one,
because
that
does
get
used
and
there
is
parking
and
especially
with
that,
the
school
next
door,
though
what
that
parking
will
be
available
so
that
that's
one
of
the
concerns
I
again
I
had
with
the
no
link
area
is
the
lack
of
park
to
be
able
to
learn
to
be
able
to
hold
anything
there.
All
right
I
will
then
follow
up
with
Mark,
berry
and
fold
that
into
the
comments,
assuming
he
has
some
input.
A
For
me
all
right,
thank
you
for
reminding
me
of
that.
That
was
somehow
I
had
it
there
and
I
actually
didn't
cross
it
off
when
I
do
my
cross
off
the
list.
Okay,
so
now
we're
back
on
track,
I!
Think
back
to
the
conservation
plan
update,
that's
the
no
Inc
one,
all
right
so
I
think.
Let
me
stop
sharing
here.
A
So
maybe
the
way
to
do
this
to
go
through
the
questions
that
are
outstanding
from
I
think
Bruce
put
out
a
note
that
K
and
it
sits
in
your
package
that
was
drafted
by
Tom
and
the
the
text
committee
I
I've
kind
of
added
a
couple
of
line
items
on
it,
but
going
through
that.
The
first
item
on
that
list
would
be
the
reviewer
or
organizations.
A
A
I
A
D
A
That
that's
what
I
want
to
talk
about
so
so
I
think
a
courtesy
copy,
I
think
brain
may
be
the
way
to
split.
This
is
do
a
Senate
courtesy
copy,
saying
it's
out
for
review
and
rather
than
having
the
staff
spend
staff
time
reviewing
it
get
other
input
and
then
Senate
send
it
tell
the
staff,
here's
the
updates,
but
send
it
to
him
as
a
courtesy
copy.
Maybe
I
should
ask
Bruce
his
input
on
that.
B
B
C
C
B
C
So
send
it
to
the
other
groups
now
well
after
tonight,
if
we
think
we're
ready
so
to
their
groups,
get
back.
Do
the
edits,
based
on
that
feedback
and
I
would
say
like
ask
them
to
get
feedback
by.
You
know
next
month's
meeting
I'm
not
sure
how
you
want
a
time
there
feedback
and
then
and
then
make
those
changes
and
then
give
it
to
you
to
the
town
to
give
to
the
other
Commission's.
B
A
All
right,
so
what
I'm
hearing
is
a
multi-step
approach.
The
first
step
is
to
go
with
conservation
groups
primarily
that
are
within
within
the
town,
then
go
to
the
town,
planning
and
staffing
and
commissions
and
conservation
and
surrounding
towns,
and
then
the
third
one
would
be
I
guess.
A
formal
release
to
the
town
manager
in
the
town
council
is
that
is
that
the
three-step
process.
A
C
A
D
E
E
A
B
D
B
A
Remember
we're
an
advisory
committee,
so
we're
not
required
to
do
a
formal
data
gathering
session,
so
we
want
to
be
as
open
as
possible,
but
knowing
how
long
we've
been
working
on
this,
it
did
that.
Would
that
would
date.
You
know
it
would
take
a
while
so
I
think
that
might
be
the
way
to
go
Bruce
to
chat
with
you
about
putting
an
announcement
when
we,
when
we
publish
that,
says
it's
available
and
then
provide
a
length
of
the
document
standalone
outside
of
our
agenda
sessions
where
it
normally
is
and
make
it
available.
A
A
We'll
have
to
think
about
who
we
want
to
direct
it
to
whether
it's
it's
one
of
us
or
whether
it's
just
a
general
address
within
the
town,
so
we'll
chat
about
that.
Okay,
okay,
so
I
would
look
for
a
motion
on
the
to
make
this
from
a
proposed
list
to
be
the
list
of
agencies
to
review
someone
willing
to
throw
a
proposal
or
a
motion
out
there
right.
C
I
move
that
we
it's
Michelle
I,
move
that
we
do
the
review
of
open
space
plan.
According
to
the
discussion
we
had,
which
is
the
three
layers,
the
first
layer,
the
conservation
groups
in
the
public,
the
second
layer,
the
town
and
then
the
third,
the
town,
Commission's
and
then
the
third
layer,
the
town
council
and
whatever
other
details
need
to
go
in.
There.
B
C
C
A
B
Right
so
it's
to
send
out
the
motion
was
to
send
out
the
plan
as
discussed
during
this
meeting
step.
One
would
be
open
space
groups
and
other
nonprofits
I
wrote,
step
two
would
be
town
staff
and
town,
Commission's
and
step
three
would
be
town
council,
oh
also,
step.
Two
was
public
I.
Have
that
as
well.
C
B
C
B
A
Well,
no,
no,
we're
not
going
to
town
cut
wells,
yes
or
no.
We
are
by
Charter
obligated
to
provide
an
inventory
once
a
year,
so
this
is
kind
of
presenting
that
at
the
minimum,
what
I
would
propose
it
kind
of
getting
ahead
of
ourselves.
Is
that
when
we
get
to
step
three
that
we
would
provide
a
cover
letter
to
the
town
council,
asking
them
to
support
our
conclusions
and
recommendations
and
the
actions
that
we
have
in
there?
So
that
would
that
that,
to
me
step
three
is
to
say:
we're
making.
A
You
know:
here's
our
input,
here's
our
assessment,
there's
a
series
of
actions
that
we'd
like
to
take,
and
we
want
the
town
council
support
on
the
execution
of
those
actions,
because
a
significant
number
of
those
actions
requires
town
staff
to
support
and/or,
execute
so
I
think
Ray.
It's
not
a
requirement
that
we
do
it,
but
I
think
it's
important
to
do
it.
I
I
A
Well,
we're
gonna
have
a
separate
discussion
and
vote
on
the
cover
letter
to
the
town
council
at
a
future
date
so
that
that's
I've
been
kind
of
thinking
about.
We
need
different
cover
letters
for
each
one
of
these
releases,
but
well
I'll.
Leave
that
for
a
future
discussion
and
I'll
I'll
volunteer
to
take
a
whack
at
a
cover
letter
for
each
of
these
stages,
all
right.
So
there
is
a
motion.
It's
been
seconded
any
additional
discussion.
A
A
Right,
unanimous,
that's
good
I
mean
I'd
love
to
say
win,
but
I'm
gonna
hold
off
the
seconds
on
that
until
we
go
through
some
of
the
other
questions.
So
that
was
the
first
question
here
now
going
down
the
list
from
so
these
are
from
the
text
committee.
So
maybe
I
should
turn
it
over
time
to
take
us
through
the
three
or
four
questions.
The
only
addition
I
would
make
is
to
add
in
the
criteria
review
as
one
of
the
questions
that
you
didn't
put
there,
but
it's
kind
of
it's
in
there.
F
G
G
So
we
basically
kind
of
kept
the
one
paragraph,
this
initial
paragraph
as
a
rollover.
That's
basically
taken
directly
out
of
the
introduction
section
of
the
plan,
and
then
we
basically
rather
than
having
a
summary
of
each
of
the
different
paragraphs,
you
know
a
single
statement,
summary
of
each
paragraph
throughout
the
whole
plan.
We
basically
put
the
Charter
in
stars
on
what
we're
what
our
requirements
are
as
conservation
committee.
G
We
also
put
this
in
back
into
the
actual
plan
so
that
we
understand
what
we're
doing
here
relative
to
is
try
to
get
this
down
to
a
one.
You
know
Zek
you,
a
summary,
then
we
went
in
and
talked
in
regard
to
the
conservation
plan
describes
the
seven
items
that
we
voted
on
a
couple
of
months
ago
in
regard
to
you
know,
proposed
green
belts
and
then
what
we're
basically
doing
here
is
it
with
one
response
and
the
guard
there.
You
know
just
like
completely
expand
that
put
green
belts
and
we're.
G
We
have
modification
additions
so
that
the
POC
D
is
our
recommended.
Likewise,
for
each
of
these
I
just
kind
of
went
down
the
list
as
far
as
though
the
highlighted
recommendations
are
for
each
of
the
seven
areas
for
our
priorities,
then
we
put
in
a
plug
in
here
relative
to
the
CI
peas,
because
we
understand
that
these
next
year
will
be
the
first
time
we're
going
up
for
funding.
G
Well,
then,
we
talked
about
generalizations
of
the
type
of
areas
that
we're
in
how
we're
handling
our
identification
of
proposed
open
spaces,
and
we
talked
about
the
electronic
tool
that
we
developed
and
that
there's
a
separate
user's
manual
and
that
we
have
a
total
of
41
recommendations
identified
in
the
plan.
The
written
version
that
you
saw
here,
what
I've
done
from
the
the
version
that
was
in
our
own,
that
is,
was
in
your
packet
I've
added
in
two
areas,
Corrections
for
actions
that
we've
taken
today.
G
One
is
some
comments
that
were
received
in
regard
to
the
inventory
list
in
regard
to
the
made
some
Corrections
in
the
subdivision
areas
based
on
communications
with
Michelle
and
then
I,
also
because
we
passed
the
National
Fish
and
Wildlife
Fund
I
put
a
recommendation
in
there
to
reflect
that
we're
supporting
these
areas
in
the
future
currently
and
in
the
future.
So
there's
a
new
recommendation.
That's
come
this
one
up
to
40
back
up
to
41
no
recommendations
so.
E
G
References
also
to-
and
then
this
was
all
dated
today
as
far
as
the
revision
number,
as
opposed
to
the
February,
to
the
main
version
that
you
have
in
your
hands
figure
eight
I'm
a
configuration
control
perspective.
So
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we've
kind
of
got
buy-in
from
everybody
from
a
text
team
perspective
that
everybody
likes
this
revised
executive
summary
that
was
just
down
to
two
pages.
G
It's
just
focusing
on
on
the
very
critical
things
that
that
we're
looking
for
from
an
action
perspective
from
the
Commission,
rather
than
trying
to
talk
up
and
try
to
give
any
kind
of
summary
of
all
the
history
and
and
referencing
stuff
that
we've
talked
about
in
the
rest
of
the
plan.
So
it's
more
of
an
action
called
an
action
rather
than
a
such
a
true
detailed
summary
of.
What's
in
the
document,
I
just.
E
So
I
had
I
had
mentioned
this
to
Tom,
and
he
felt
we
should
put
it
in
front
of
everybody
rather
than
just
change
it
I,
don't
even
like
the
first
sentence,
where
it
says
the
primary
purpose
for
the
preparation
of
an
open
space
conservation
plan.
It
implies
that
you
need
to
justify
your
own
existence.
I
think
you
could
delete
primary
purpose
for
the
preparation
of
an.
If
you
just
say,
the
broken
space
conservation
plan
stems
from
a
critical
need.
D
G
I
In
executive
summary,
I
think
that
you
should
say
somewhere
that
it's
the
town
of
grotton's
open
space
conservation
plan,
because
you
know
somewhere
along
the
line
there
is
this
assumption
that
it's
for
the
town
of
Groton?
It's
not
the
city
of
Groton,
it's
not
anywhere
else,
but
this
is
what
the
plan
is.
It's
for
the
town
of
Groton,
okay
and
you
jack,
that
in
there
somewhere.
My
second
comment
is
for.
E
H
I
And
it's
certainly,
if
you
want
to
keep
it
in
the
document.
My
suggestion
is
to
put
it
within
the
tail
end
of
the
document
and
where
there
might
be
references
or
further
information.
Something
like
that.
That's
my
feeling
on
that
section
and
if
I
can
just
move
on
to
a
couple
of
others
come
all
over
and
that
is
on
the
open
space
conservation
plan
identifies
seven
priorities
on
your
first
two
priorities.
I
I
I
In
the
diversity
databases.
You
know
we
support
the
databases,
I
think
that
that's
sort
of
intuitive
that
we
do
but
I
don't,
but
it's
only
that
database
is
only
limited
by
what
has
been
found
in
the
past
and
I.
Don't
know
who's
actively,
looking,
especially
in
the
northern
part
of
the
town,
which
is
areas
that
we
would
like
to
expand.
I
Also,
besides,
protection
of
the
current
parks
and
subdivision
of
open
spaces,
that's
currently
what
we
have,
but
the
natural
resource
base
outdoor
recreation
we
also
might
put
in
there
about
acquiring
future
of
spaces
for
Parks
and
Rec.
So,
as
has
been
mentioned
in
the
past
that,
yes,
the
participation
in
with
number
kids
in
town
has
been
decreasing.
G
Okay,
I've
got
those
notes
and
I
will
come
up
with
some
words:
I'm,
not
gonna.
Try
to
nuke
that
or
you
know,
make
corrections
at
this
point.
I
do
appreciate
all
those
comments
and
we
will
reduce
this
factor
down
here
and
then
expand
use
the
white
space
here
to
expand.
Then
these
other
four
areas
that
you
brought
up
here.
G
C
Is
the
shell
extra
support
brace
edge
just
in
general,
we
should
I
agree
that
we
should
be
saying
we're
doing
this
for
our
purposes
and
if
these
other
people
also
do
that,
that's
great,
but
but
we
have
a
purpose.
That's
beyond
what
these
other
organizations
say
right
pray
is
that
what
you've
kind
of
yeah
exactly.
A
G
D
G
Things
there's
a
lot
of
ties
to
them
all,
but
I
understand
what
Bray
is
talking
in
regard
to
rally,
and
these
are
as
far
as
it
as
the
reader
a
first
time
reader.
That's
not
familiar
with
the
plan
taking
these
things,
they're
kind
of
like.
Where
is
this
coming
from,
or
what
is
this
he's
trying
to?
You
know
I
think
from
a
initial
cold
body.
Reader
is,
let's
be
a
little
bit
more
helpful
to
the
reader
time
to
have
a
better
understanding
and
what
we're
talking
about
here
for
a
summary
perspective,
Tom.
E
E
E
A
C
D
G
G
I
Is
right
just
a
quick
follow-up
that
somebody
mentioned
a
thought
that
I
sort
of
lost
track
about
writing
the
whole
conservation
plan,
and
that
is
that
we're
trying
to
to
present
this
to
people
who,
like
the
outers
out
of
doors,
and
hopefully
it
would
support
open
space
protection
expansion
whatever,
but
don't
have
the
background
and
when
they
look
at
in
the
complete
expand,
proposed
green
breaks.
And
then
we
talked
about
the
planet
conservation
development.
They
may
not
even
know
what
that
is.
I
D
I
Familiar
with
it,
but
if
you,
if
you
don't
deal
with
it,
you
don't
even
know
what
it
is
so
with
just
preservation
natural
for
in
Florida
to
make
a
general
statement
about.
What's
in
the
body,
I
think
would
make
an
easier,
read
and
understanding
to
hopefully
engage
them,
so
they
can
move
forward
in
the
document.
I
You
so
like
number
number
three
down
a
little
bit,
please
so
number
three
natural
waters,
drinking
water
resources
support,
is
directed
to
Groton
utilities
for
future
open
space
acquisitions
to
expand
watersheds
that
that's
right
to
the
point,
and
it's
not
to
a
committee
who
studying
at
or
whatever,
but
it's
a
nice
general
statement
that
gives
you
announcement
and
then
woods
and
carbon
systems.
The
question
support
is
direct
to
better
tracking
of
clear-cutting
and
so
forth.
So
there's
a
general
statement
of
a
concern.
Let's
say
about
that:
they'll
be
discussed
in
the
document.
I
J
Thank
You
mr.
chair
and
I
didn't
want
to
insert
myself
into
your
prior
discussions.
You
know
definitely
respect
your
your
space
to
speak
openly
without
any
counselors
interfering
in
your
affairs.
So
thank
you
for
acknowledging
me.
I
would
like
to
comment
on
your
seven
points.
I
or
some
goals
like
seven
goals,
I
should
say
I
would
add,
though,
to
I
believe
number
six,
where
you
discuss
natural
heritage
resources,
and
you
know
I
think
it's
important
to
highlight.
J
You
know
here
in
Groton
there
are
significant
cultural
resources,
especially
as
it
relates
to
you
know:
Native
American,
ceremonial
landscapes.
You
know
if
you
go
through
you
hiking
in
really
any
corner
in
Groton,
you'll
come
across
various
Cairns
and
standing
stones
and
ceremonial
walls
and
stone
chambers,
and
it's
very
fascinating.
A
history
and
I
I
think
it's
important
to
highlight
that
in
any.
You
know
open
space
plan
that
when
we
have
these
resources,
but
they
they
ought
to
be
protected,
so
I
think
in
all
you
know
there.
J
G
E
J
Fantastic
Thank,
You,
Kristen
and
I
look
forward
to
reading
it
in
its
entirety
and
thank
you
all
for
your
hard
work
on
this
and
some
very
important
work.
Irrespective
of
whether
or
not
it's
required
to
produce
the
document
there,
you
know
it
great
that
we're
doing
that.
So,
thank
you
so
much
everyone.
G
G
Let
me
see
if
I
can
scrunch
this
to
the
right
size
here.
Okay,
what
we've
done
here
is
in
the
since
the
last
version
we
took
it.
We
you
took
comments
last
time
we
just
we
did
the
splits
over
here
on
the
it's
very
in
the
northeast
quadrant,
where
we
started
our
discussions
in
the
past,
we
still
have
the
downtown
mystic
connection
area
that
we
have
to
kind
of
sort
through
here
relative
to
the
coastal
walkway.
G
G
G
That's
a
very
highly
desirable
area
and
putting
that
as
a
you
know,
it's
not
something
that
we
need
to
do
right
now,
but
a
potential
area
to
be
taking
a
look
at
connecting
the
two
town
areas
here.
Would
you
want
to
hear?
Is
that
they're
not
at
the
nautilus
I'll
overlook
and
then
up
in
here
into
the
area
up
in
just
north
of
the
gun?
She
want
area
so
because
this
is
this
country
want
rolled
right
in
here
that
I've
got
my
hand
down.
G
This
is
all
the
state
owns
all
this
area
right
in
here
and
then
you've
got
the
desires
in
the
past
and
there
are
in
the
POC
D
here.
That's
why
this
is
the
light,
yellow
light,
green,
it's
right!
That's
a
POC
D
a
previously
identify
the
area,
and
so
we're
just
connecting
this
for
the
based
on
the
review
for
the
area
for
the
natures
network,
corridor
areas
and
so
just
to
be
kind
of
consistent.
That
was
the
one
area
that
we
two
major
changes
in
here.
C
D
C
I
know
part
of
them
are
already
on
our
list,
but
some
aren't
and
so
as
I'm
trying
to
do
that.
One
of
one
of
the
my
issues
was,
for
instance,
if
you
go
to
the
farthest
on
the
eastern
side,
unless
crime
in
the
middle
on
the
eastern
side,
I
mean
that
that
goes
through
most
like
the
bottom
part
of
it,
it
goes
through
a
development
there,
its
little
houses
there's
no
way.
We
could
turn
that
into
part
of
the
Greenbelt.
C
G
Well,
this
is
one
of
the
areas
that
that
I
was.
You
know
kind
of
confused
on
in
the
past
night
and
I
have
no
problem
getting
out
of
this,
because
I
can
argue
this
multiple
ways.
One
was
that
we're
supposed
to
be.
You
know
from
a
town
big
picture.
Town
perspective
is
that
people
have
been
talking
in
regard
to
you
know,
starting
up
here.
You
know
somewhere
up
in
here
and
being
able
to
walk
to
downtown
mystic,
which
is
it's.
G
What
you're
really
trying
to
do
is
that
from
a
recreational
perspective,
we
we
want
to
have
that
walkway,
but
the
flip
side
of
it
is
that
from
an
animal
you
know
corridor
way,
there's
no
way.
You
can
do
it
and
that's
why
I
guess
to
some
degree.
Well,
the
coastal
walkway
starts
here
and
goes
south
only
going
north
is
too
hard.
So
maybe
we
should
take
this
out.
I
have
no
problem
with
that.
I
was
just
trying
to
have
a
continuous
eastern
coast,
but
I
can
say
we
do.
This
is
our
Eastern.
A
I
think
you're,
making
a
good
point
that
says:
there's
walkable
and
there's
wildlife
corridor
right
and
the
wildlife
could
care
less.
Whether
built
you
built
there
or
not
and
I
know
the
the
emphasis
has
been
on
walkable
quarters
we're
trying
to
make
it
both
yeah
and
I'm
sitting
here,
I'm
gonna
throw
this
out
I,
don't
even
like
it
cuz.
It
complicates
thing
you
know.
Is
there
way
to
differentiate
walkable
versus
wildlife
corridors?
G
Is
where
we
run
into
a
problem
where
we've
got
multiple
priorities
in
our
list?
You
know
from
a
from
a
3.5
perspective
for
preservation
of
flora
fauna.
You
want
to
have.
Do
you
want
a
corridor?
That's
you
know
just
totally
open,
nothing,
no
trails!
No!
Nothing!
If
you
want
a
really
good
corridor
to
some
degree,
you
can
argue
that
everything
from
from
the
interstate
exit
at
Allen
Street
all
the
way
down
here
to
route
117
is
a
great
animal
corridor,
because
there's
no
human
people
touching
it
Hanyu.
J
G
Corridor
is
a
problem.
You
know,
there's
there's
a
very
few
ways
to
get
into
that
corridor.
That's
just
come
on,
you
know,
I'm,
looking
at
you
know,
I
want
a
really
best
corridor
to
get
over
here
to
New
London
is,
is
have
people
walk
down
the
middle
of
the
inner?
You
know
interstate
in
here
somehow
and
then
get
over
the
years.
How
I
originally
was
starting
to
look
at
this
thing,
but
you
know
when
you
try
to
start
walking
in
this
and
down
the
middle
of
I-95.
G
G
You
know
east-west
corridor
for
a
Greenbelt
perspective
they're
there,
but
that's
you
know
in
what
are
we
defining
ourselves
as
green
belts
is
for
wildlife
as
well
as
for
trails?
You
know
you
take
a
look
at
you
know
the
Candlewood
Hill
area
right
in
here
you
know,
there's
a
nice
trail
that
does
this
as
well
as
animals,
so
you're
doing
both
you're
doing
them.
G
The
wildlife
management
perspective
and
there's
there's
trails
that
have
been
cut
over
the
years
that
go
that
do
these
almost
like
this
identical
path
is
already
trail
today,
so
it's
a
Manor
and
likewise
over
here-
and
you
know,
you
have
essentially
the
trails
for
the
Candlewood
Ridge
with
ghosa
and
they're
Avery
farm
properties.
This
is
already
in
existence.
How
do
you
get
across
184?
G
E
I
comment
on
the
it's
Kristin
again
over
by
the
mystic
just
north
of
town,
south
of
95,
that
area
the
fact
that
it's
yet
right
there,
the
fact
that
it's
dotted
I
think
we
should.
We
should
not
take
it
away,
because
some
of
those
properties
are
I
think
a
little
bit
spacious
with
like
a
lot
of
lawn
and
stuff,
and
they
may
well
be
underwater
in
a
few
years
anyway.
So
they
may
not
be
so
habitable
and
so
it'll
just
become.
E
I
Can
I
make
a
comment
all
right,
this
break
yeah
you
brought
up
Larry
brought
up
to
a
point
that
I
really
like
that
this
map
represents
both
walking
trails
as
well
as
wildlife
corridors
and
the
map.
The
time
is
done
is
really
good,
because,
even
though
it
has
dots
on
it,
I
really
support
the
the
concept
that
these
are
River.
I
I
If
you
were
to
take
the
pink
area
coming
from
the
Mystic
River
that
little
dotted
trail
with
its
pink
this
one
here,
instead
of
connecting
it
to
to
the
Green
Line
connected
to
the
right
to
the
light
green,
which
is
the
wells
property
of
the
town
owned
property.
That
goes
all
the
way
to
Ledyard.
You
know
it
was
impossible
from
there,
as
maybe
another
dot
indicator
of
another
access.
I
I
That
yeah,
that
could
work
one
of
the
big
problems
that
we've
always
had
is
field
crest
below,
where
we're
just
talking
about
where
the
yellow
and
green,
yellow
dots
and
green
line
going
through
field
trips.
That's
always
been
a
challenge,
because
that
is
crime
find
land
by
the
soils,
experts
and
that's
where
they
build
houses,
I
guess
in
the
1940s.
I
I
Of
Courage,
and
so
that
sort
of
took
over
a
great
corridor
would
have
been
nice
to
have
more
open
space
through
there,
but
so
we've
always
had
the
challenge
of.
How
do
we
get
around
it
to
go
north
from
Pequot
woods?
We
run
right
into
it,
and
then
we
can
pick
up
some
trails
that
you
nicely
showed
at
the
top
of
the
town,
because
we
don't
know
what's
happening
with
Aldridge
I'm,
sorry,
whittles,
whittles
farm.
We
don't
know
where
that's
going
in
the
future.
I
I
D
G
G
C
C
G
G
C
G
G
But
that's
what
kind
of
way,
but
by
taking
this
out
of
the
plan
and
just
making
this
a
recommendation
to
standalone
document
that
doesn't
it's
not
part
of
our
plan
is,
is
that
we
erect
made
a
recommendation,
was
that
was
the
comments
that
I
took
from
everyone
that
I
received
from
what
after
last
meeting
and
so
but
I
think
we
need
just
you
know.
You
know,
agree
that
it's
not
part
of
the
directly
part
of
the
plan,
that's
going
to
be
a
standalone
document
and
that
that's
why
I'm
asking
the
question
tonight.
I
G
J
G
That
we
clearly
make
the
parks
and
recreation
responsible
that
we
that
Conservation
Commission
will
work
with
parks
are
right
directly
to
take
a
look
at
their
stewardship
plans
and
that
we-
and
then
we
also
put
in
into
into
document
what
are
the
usage
allowed
usage
on
the
open
space
right
now,
it's
a
it's
a
free-for-all.
Up
literally
a
free-for-all
out
there,
okay,
I
I.
D
A
G
This
is
a
separate
action
that
when
you
talk
about
yeah
to
the
town
council
with
our
final
plan,
this
would
be
one
of
the
things
that
we
could
say
here.
Here's
what
we're
going
to
be
working
with
the
staff
will
have
the
staff
review
this
submitted
to
you
for
action
and
stuff
as
a
it's
a
future
activity,
but
it's
not
you've
taken
it
out
of
the
plan
here
to
get
the
plan
move
continuing
along.
G
I
D
F
I
Worked
with,
for
instance,
people
are
woods
and
a
little
bit
with
a
cop
property.
Those
are
two
opens
large,
open
spaces
that
we
have
as
far
as
a
lot
of
what's
in
this
document.
That
says
no!
No,
no,
it
seems
to
me
that
we're
we're
already
doing
it.
For
instance,
cop
property
had
problems
with
vehicles
driving
in
on
the
property,
and
they
addressed
it
by
closing
off
entrance
points,
and
things
like
that
and
I
don't
know
within
the
Parks
and
Rec.
You
know
what
their.
I
How
legally
they're
they
can
keep
cars?
You
know
random
cars
out
if
you
will
or
pickup
trucks,
in
other
words,
what's
what's
the
always
that
they're
working
with
that
no
motorized,
you
know
watercraft,
no
boats,
we
don't
have
any
ponds
big
enough
for
both
motorized
boats,
but
there's
one
in
here
that
I
thought
was
very
interesting,
and
this
is
if
you
want
to
go
down
to
number
of
P.
I
I
That
dogs
would
frighten
a
wildlife
out
there,
so
you
know
if
we,
if
we
ticket
verbatim,
what's
on
this
any
discussion,
this
is
no
free
roaming
dogs
are
prohibited.
I
want
to
watch
somebody
from
Parks
and
Rec
sit
out
there
every
night
and
making
sure
that
there
aren't
any
gang
of
dogs
getting
together
and
running
through
the
open
space
properties.
Okay,
it's
through
somebody
well.
A
I
mean
we
do
have
leash
laws
in
effect.
Now
it's
supposed
to
be
on
leashes
right,
oh
yeah,
some
of
them
say
under
control.
I
admit
that
I
think
those
are
the
kind
of
discussions
we
can
have
in
the
details
of
it.
I
think
the
question
time
has
now
is:
is
the
is
the
concept
of
an
open
space
ordinance,
something
we
want
to
address
and
include,
although
not
at
this
point
in
time,
I.
D
G
G
Did
keep
the
recommend
if
I
go
back
down
here
to
the
recommendations
for
open
space
for
policy?
Is
that
we
did
have
a
yes
right
in
here
is
that
we
have
a
short-term
coordinating
with
Town,
Council
or
establishment
all
the
states
protection
orders
that
provides
the
implementation
of
mandated
stewardship
management
plans
for
destiny
properties,
establish
an
office
based
Stewart
and
provides
detailed
regulation
and
prohibited
activities
and
open
space
properties,
as
outlined
in
sections
of
6.41.
G
Going
back
up
to
six
point
four
one.
You
talk
about
a
protection
of
open
space,
a
comparison
of
alcohol
plus
based
protection.
Lawrence's
revealed
the
only
protection
currently
in
place
around
open
spaces
found
on
the
blight
ordinance.
The
town
of
Cheshire
Connecticut
has
implemented
very
comprehensive
helpers,
face
protection
ordinance
and
the
conservation
was
rejected.
G
A
I
I
I
I,
don't
know
what
else
format
there
might
be,
but
I
agree
with
you
that
this
should
be
lifted
away
from
the
document
and
to
be
reviewed
later,
because
I
agree
with
Tom
that
if
there
isn't
anything
out
there
on
do's
and
don'ts,
with
open
space
at
the
present
time
that
anybody
can
refer
to
whether
it's
Parks
and
Rec
Department
or
the
Planning
Department
on
on
uses
of
the
open
suit
on
the
open
space
that
we
an
ordinance
open
space
ordinance,
then
perhaps,
is
the
way
to
go.
Johnny.
G
D
G
I
have
no
problem,
but
then
that's
I
think,
but
there's
areas
other
areas
of
the
town,
such
as
the
Joel
property.
There
are
75
acres,
that's
just
lying
there
fallow
that
nobody's
doing
anything
with
okay,
it's
not
showing
up
you
know,
and,
and
so
what
I'm
trying
to
do
is
that
we
need
to
we
I
think,
as
as
the
advocates
for
open
space
here
through
this
plan
need
to
be
working
with
the
parks
and
recs
folks.
A
All
right
so
I
think
we're
in
agreement
and
it's
we
got
to
do
a
lot
more
work
on
stewardship,
and
this
is
part
of
it.
So
I
don't
think
I
heard
anyone
disagreeing
with
the
current
approach
for
doing
within
ordinance
and
wood
stewardship,
separating
it
out
putting
it
later,
taking
it
out
of
this
document
today
that
care,
okay,.
G
A
A
G
Yeah
for
everybody
else's
consideration
when
I
put
it
in
the
draft,
and
this
particular
draft
was
my
suggestion
to
Larry,
based
on
the
action
item
that
he
gave
to
everybody
at
the
last
meeting,
and
so
this
is
my.
This
is
a
Tom
Olsen
version,
I
didn't
know
what
Larry
I
had
not
received
anything
from
Larry
or
anybody
else,
so
I
just
updated
it
with
my
know.
A
That
that's,
why
I
mean
so,
there's
basically
I
think
I,
don't
want
to
speak
for
Ann,
but
I
will
how's
that
so
so
there's
two
major
things
he
suggested
one
was
basically
this
is.
This
is
the
point
structure
that
I
kind
of
started
with
that
was
then
modified
by
Tom
and
her
observation
was
well.
Maybe
we
should
do
a
rating
scale
of
one
to
five
to
keep
the
same
proportions,
because
I
believe
you
did.
H
Can
I
just
make
a
point
so
use
the
max,
so
my
understanding,
Tom
I,
guess
I,
didn't
realize
this
who
had
suggested
this?
But
if
you
use
the
max
what
I'm
calling
the
max
point
method
and
you
put
all
eights
for
the
max
point
of
eight
for
criterion
number
one-
it
doesn't
actually
rank
order
that
it
doesn't
weight
it.
If
you
look
at
the
right
here,
column,
the
max
point,
column,
E
and
the
percentages,
it
doesn't
put
them
in
a
rank
order.
H
So
it's
a
if
each
of
those
three
got
the
maximum
number
of
points,
if
you're
not
actually
getting
the
weight
that
you
want
or
the
greenbelts.
So
there's
two
approaches
that
you
can
take.
You
can
either
have
an
equal
number
of
good.
This
is
a
result
of
the
fact
that
you
have
unequal
number
of
questions
in
each
of
the
categories,
so
you
can
either
have
force
yourself
to
have
six
questions
in
each
category
and
then
and
then
you
don't
there's
no
longer
a
need
to
weight
them
or
well.
H
The
other
thing
yeah
so
using
a
rating
system
of
1
to
8
for
green
belts,
from
1
to
7
for
coastline
and
1
to
6
I,
don't
know
about
anyone
else,
but
that
gives
me
a
headache
to
try
and
figure
out
how
I
would
rate
you
know
each
of
the
eight
categories
with
a
different
rating
scale
and
there's
a
lot
of
bias
that
will
come
in
play
so
having
the
same
rating
scale
for
each
of
the
categories.
I
think
is
really
important.
A
H
A
A
I
mean,
but
essentially
it's
the
same
scale
Tom,
that
we
started
with
just
kind
of
manipulated
the
numbers
to
allow
it
to
be,
let's
say,
adjusted
back
and
forth,
but
it
comes
out
in
this
column.
Here
you
could
see
the
percentages
in
V
I
guess
it
is
that
it
comes
out
very
close
to
you
know
the
weighting
that
we
started.
That's
what
we
started
with.
What
do
we
wanted
to
wait?
Each
one
of
these
eight
plus
the
nine
special
one
right
that
we
had.
E
So
can
I
ask
a
question
to
clarify
clarify
so
basically
what
you're
saying
is:
if
a
number
has
only
three
items,
then
each
one
of
those
is
like
getting
a
33%
waiting,
whereas
a
number
has
six
items
they're
only
getting
like
twelve
point,
eight
percent
or
whatever
so
the
more
items
in
a
category,
the
smaller
the
weight
that
each
walks
away
with.
Is
that
kind
of
what
you're
saying
you
know:
I'm.
H
E
A
H
H
A
A
H
This
is
just
a
total
rework
of
this,
the
entire
thing
and
take
it
or
leave
it.
It's
just
actually
puts
the
same
number
of
questions
in
each
of
the
categories
where
you
I
guess.
My
other
question,
too,
is
if
you're
reading
a
green
belt
is
the
only
thing
that
we
really
want
to
know
about
it.
It's
it's
where
it's
located.
Do
we
want
to
know
other
attributes
as
well?
So
you
know
the
this
is
read
it's
just
in
a
different
order,
but
it
doesn't
matter,
but
it's
binary,
so
it's
either
yes
or
no,
and
then.
H
It's
very
straightforward,
there's!
No!
You
have
to
the
the
thing
here
is
that
the
questions
need
to
be
written
so
that
you
can
answer
it's
endo
and
that's
sometimes
a
bit
hard,
they're
just
different
ways
of
doing
it,
and
then
the
visualizations
was
a
different
piece.
That
is
sometimes
it's
just
really
easy.
H
C
C
H
I
G
A
Okay,
that's
what
I
was
looking
for,
what
the
heck
happened
to
it
there.
It
is
okay,
so,
like
I
said,
there's
two
different
things:
one
was
presentation
and
the
other
one
was.
You
know
how
you
come
up.
You
know
the
waiting
and
the
other
structure.
So
when
I
looked
at
the
presentation,
when
I
went,
I've
used
these
before
and
I
think
it's
it
makes
things
a
lot
more
visible.
H
But
this
is
like
a
random
I.
Don't
know,
I
have
to
go
back
and
look
to
see
what
I
actually
put
in,
but
I
think
this
was
just
an
example
of
an
arbitrary
I.
Just
went
arbitrary,
put
arbitrary
numbers
in
just
as
a
visualization
that
you
can
see
that
green
dot.
You
know
very
quickly,
so
these
are
two
different
rating
systems
that
I
put
in
the
left
and
the
right,
and
so
that
visually
you
can
see
immediately
that
the
one
on
the
right
has
several
of
your
highest
priority:
higher
scores
and
the
higher
priority
categories.
A
A
D
A
Is
we
did
spend
a
lot
of
time
here
in
getting
the
waiting
between
the
benign,
basically
nine,
and
we
had
you-
know
special
added
numbers
which
got
lost
a
little
bit
here,
but
this
does
provide
a
way
of
evening
it
out,
and
then
the
visualization
of
this
is
a
different
discussion.
So,
let's
throw
it
out
is
that
first
we
had
I
guess
we
were
I,
guess
to
the
left.
Let
me
get
the
columns
up.
We
were
C
through
E
is
what
we
came
into
this
meeting
with.
A
So
in
order
to
make
some
progress
here
is
that
we
have
three
different
options.
Two
options
to
modify
this
chart
are
going
to
an
alternate
approach
entirely,
which
kind
of
goes
to
a
different
questions,
ones
and
zeros
on
a
specific
question,
so
in
order
to
sort
that
can
I
get
a
sense
of
kind
of
sticking
with
this
a
bit
or
a
switch
to
a
different
approach.
What's
what's
your
sense
out
here
guys.
G
G
As
tip
is
currently
being
maintained
and
I
think
whether
we
can
hit,
we
can
leave
this
as
it
is,
if
I
take
this
out
of
the
planet,
because
it
just
references
that
there's
a
criteria
that
we
use
for
objective
that
we're
gonna
objective
I
already
in
since,
if
I
go
back
to
the
plan
in
the
Appendix
C
of
the
my
plan
here,
if
you
go
up
there,
I
just
have
we
talked
a
little
about
objective
components
and
then
open
space
weighting
criteria.
It's
just
generic
enough
that
we
can
and
I
can
make
sure
that
I.
G
You
take
me
just
as
the
that
the
economics
values,
forty
percent,
with
special
considerations
so
I
could
take.
I
could
just
tweak
on
those
words
and
then
take
this
thing
out,
and
that
way
we
at
least
we
have
this,
and
we
can
kick.
This-
can
down
the
road
to
the
next
month's
to
talk
about.
What's
going
to
be
in
the
user's
manual
cuz
I
gotta,
think
about
this
I
hadn't
seen
any
of
this
before
I
appreciate
and
really
did
a
great
job
here,
trying
to
put
alternatives
together,
which
I
really
appreciate.
G
A
So
I
I
would
be
okay
with
that
kind
of
separation
and
then
leaving
the
mechanical
mathematical
formulas.
You
know
for
the
follow-on,
because
we
still
got
to
get
all
the
data
together.
It
would
get
that
a
data
team
in
a
bed
so
I,
don't
let
me
throw
it
later.
That
I
was
an
adjustment
to
your
suggestion.
Time.
C
C
So
do
we
really
need
do
we
need
this
to
since
we're
not
gonna
we're
not
gonna
use
it
for
the
plan,
we're
not
gonna
put
it
we're
not
gonna,
run
any
properties
through
this
we're
not
and
and
I
think
we
already
say
in
the
text
that
these
are
the
important
things
we
can
make
sure
they're
covered,
but
but
I'm
kind
of
leaning
towards
Tom
I.
Don't
I'm
not
sure
that
we
need
this
in
here
at
all,.
H
D
A
For
the
feedback,
we'd
say,
as
we
put
it
out
there,
people
will
say:
well,
that's
dumb,
you
know,
but
you
know
you
should
consider
this
I
mean
you
get
some
feedback
on
like
I
said
column
C,
which
are
the
L
cuz,
the
one
through
nine
are
in
there
once
you
ate
her
in
there
in
text,
but
we
don't
have.
You
know
ABC,
and
we
don't
have
this
next
level
of
detail
just
to
provide
a
little
more
explanation
of
what
we
meant
by
number
one.
Well.
I
I
A
I
said
I
said
forty
three
I
was
thinking
three
three
and
I'd
been
okay.
Metaphoric,
no
I
always
can
count
on
you
Michelle.
To
keep
me
honest,
okay,
so
so
Tom,
yes,
I
need
direction.
So
the
direction
is
that
we
will
defer
to
it.
Probably
that
the
user
manual,
which
has
the
economic
model,
can
now
also
have
the
detailed
criteria
which
I
think
it
might
anyway,
you're
ready.
Yes,
not
so
that
is
where
we
could
put
that,
but
we
would
retain.
A
C
D
C
Of
that
last
week,
and
basically
one
of
the
things
that
I
did
was
I
took,
can
you
make
that
big
earlier?
Well,
I?
Have
it
too,
but
let's
see
it
or
not,
it
breaks
down
the
open
space
into
a
number
of
categories
and
I
try
to
be
somewhat
consistent
with
the
what's
listed
in
the
P
OCD,
and
so
we
start
off
with
the
city
and
if
you
want
start
off
with
the
on
the
I'll,
just
go
through
it
real
quickly.
A
C
So
in
in
the
in
the
P
OCD
at
so
what
I
tried
to
sort
of
explain
before
I
took
I
took
the
map
from
the
P
OCD
document
itself
that
had
listed
the
dedicated
open
space
that
managed
open
space
in
the
facilities
and
I,
went
in
and
tried
to
identify
each
of
the
properties
from
that
map.
So
so
the
column,
that's
a
2016
DMF!
C
That's
what
that
is.
Those
are
those
are.
What
I
could
what
I
could
identify
on
the
POC
DS
map
that
how
they
labeled
those
three
types
of
properties,
and
so
one
of
the
things
is.
The
utilities
was
interesting
because
it's
a
town
utilities
Liz
that
watershed,
but
it
says
the
city
owns
it.
Okay,
so
I
have
the
city
into
two
pieces,
the
the
top
ones
that
are
actually
you
know
playing
out,
lay
open
space,
it's
physically
in
the
city
limits,
but
then
there's
that
whole
other
bunch
of
stuff,
the
1200
acres,
we're
almost
1300.
C
C
What
was
in
in
the
other
earlier
documents
that
that
Jenna
gave
us
for
the
the
maps
plus
whatever
else
I
found
scrounging
around
on
the
GIS
so
and
again,
I,
there's
possible
that
things
are
missing
and
one
thing
that
something
out
here
is
the
airport,
because
I
didn't
even
think
about
that
until
I
saw
it
in
in
the
text,
so
so
that
I
can
keep
scrolling.
So
this
estate
stuff
is
I,
hope
this
kind
of
obvious.
That's
what
that's
what
the
state
owns
right.
So
we
can
keep
going
Michelle.
C
Basically,
I
literally
every
single,
every
single
parcel
on
here,
I,
checked
out
and
I
captured
the
addresses
and
the
owners.
Thank
you,
yep,
okay.
So
so
there's
one
like
there's
some
comments
like
that.
Have
the
comment
that
stuff's
on
our
list
there's
a
couple
of
things
that
like
there's
one
thing
that
doesn't
say
the
state
owns
it
yet,
but
it's
basically
that's
what's
there,
so
you
go
through
that
and
that
then
that
gives
you
total
for
the
state
and
then
keep
going
Larry
yep.
G
C
G
C
Right
so
I
can't
remember
if
I
got
that
for
me,
if
it's
yeah
that
I
might
have
typed
that
in
if
it's,
if
it's
capital
letters,
I
copied
and
pasted
it,
okay,
not
captive
letters,
I
typed,
it
forgotten
somewhere
else.
Thank
you,
yep,
okay,
so
then,
and
then
there
so
the
town
open
space,
then
it's
basically
what
what
the
POC
D
called
dedicated
open
space.
C
So
some
of
the
things
that
are
in
the
open
space,
you
might
think,
should
be
in
the
managed
and
that's
fine,
but
these
are
things
that
are
you
know
the
memorials,
the
the
stuff,
that's
specifically
a
playground
or
whatever
or
things
that
the
POC
D
had
is
an
M
and
then
the
next
one
down
is
facilities.
It's
other
stuff.
So
it's
the
sewer
authority
stuff
anything
that
that
the
POC
D
had
is
an
F.
So
that's
some
school,
the
schools
are
there.
C
C
C
So
so
that's
what
that
category
is
and
that's
where
a
lot
of
our
love
stuffs.
That's
on
our
list
is
in
this
category
and
in
fact
the
the
list-
that's
not
on
here
yet
because
I
just
put
it
together
yesterday,
as
I
was
talking
about
earlier,
as
I
was
going
along,
the
proposed
greenways
and
pulling
up
what
parcels
we
would
need
to
do
could
do
that
completion
most
of
those
parcels
are
the
farm
and
forest
stuff.
C
A
C
A
C
I
said
when
I
put
together
the
numbers
and
Larry
added
a
different
kind
of
number,
but
but
the
ones
that
are
in
here
again
I
want
to
explain
what's
in
the
package,
so
so
the
first,
the
first
set
of
numbers
is
if
it
includes
that
that
all
that
watershed
property-
that's
in
the
city
that
but
the
yes,
the
town
watershed.
So
the
first
set
of
numbers
includes
that
cuz.
It's
a
lot
of
acres,
obviously,
and
then
the
second
set
of
numbers
takes
that
out
of
there
I.
G
C
G
C
C
C
C
While
you're
doing
this,
so
one
of
the
questions
that
we
have
is,
is
that
appendix
that's
in
the
document?
That's
the
basically
our
inventory.
What
do
we
want
to
put
in
there
I
mean
this.
This
stretch
is
obviously
turning
into
our
inventory,
but
but
how?
What?
What
expected
that?
And
how
do
we
want
to
put
that
information
into
the
document.
G
C
C
A
A
C
Yeah,
the
color
coding
doesn't
have
a
whole
lot
of
meaning,
okay,
the
parts
that
do
so
so
the
color
coding,
the
one
that
has
the
meaning
is
the
CC
list.
I
made
all
those
things
blue
yeah,
but
the
color
coding
is
inside.
It's
mostly
things
that
are
connected,
so
in
other
words
the
AV
part
nature
for
nature,
preserve
I
put
those
in
a
color,
because
there
are
two
two
properties
they're
two
parcels,
but
they
belong
together.
C
A
A
So
how
we
define
whoops
getting
down
here,
so
this
is
the
part
that
I
started
looking
at
the
numbers.
So
this
is
the
penises
like
out
of
all
the
open
space.
Here's
how
we
split
so
I
took
it
the
percent
of
the
town,
because
that's
how
the
POC
D
structured
it
and
came
came
up
with
that,
based
upon
the
2016
POC
definition,
which
is
the
d
m,
and
s
above
that
turns
out
to
be
nineteen
point
three:
four
percent
of
the
town's
area,
which
is
two
hundred
and
twenty
eight
thousand
nine
hundred.
Ninety
two
acres.
A
But
when
you
look
at
the
extract
above
based
upon
D
and
F,
you
get
about
seventeen
point
six
six.
So
if
I
look
a
palapa
one,
this
list,
we
went
up
two
percent
from
2015
to
today.
Let's
start
with
that
definition,
then
I
tried
to
figure
out.
This
is
the
actual
inventory
chart
from
the
PLC
D
and
we're
off
by
about
two
three
percent,
in
other
words
they're?
Actually,
twenty
almost
twenty
one
percent
versus
what
we've
got
is
like
nineteen
percent,
so
something
doesn't
quite
match
now.
G
D
A
Yes-
and
that's
was
my
last
request
based
upon
what
you
just
sent
me:
I
went
oh,
because
how
do
I
relate
to
two?
So
I
did
send
that
request
in
to
say
who
do
I
talk
to
to
take
these
two
lists
and
kind
of
resolve
the
debt
now
it's
close,
but
how
to
resolve
the
difference
all
right,
for
example,
if
they
use
the
airport,
we
didn't.
That
would
explain
a
piece
of
it
right
now.
This.
C
H
I
C
H
C
Question
so
let
me
so
this
is
the
explanation
for
this.
This
page
is
when
I
talked
about
earlier
with
I
took
Tom's
map
and
I
money.
It
wasn't
the
latest
one
necessarily
so
there
there
might
be
some
what
needs
to
be
added
to
this,
but
I.
Basically,
all
the
places
on
on
the
update
of
the
Greenbelt
map,
I
looked
at
all
I
looked
at
the
pink
circles
and
and
I
and
I
tried
to
locate
all
of
them.
I
didn't
there's
a
lot
of
little
properties.
I
didn't
try
to
put
in
there.
C
I
basically
found
all
the
chunks
of
property
that
were
in
any
and
if
any
part
of
the
property
inside
the
pink
circle,
I
put
it
on
this
list.
Now
I
need
to
go
back
again
with
the
new,
the
new
map
and
and
do
a
more
thorough
job.
This
was
kind
of
a
quick
and
dirty
I
need
to
print
it
out
and
really
look
at
it
more
closely.
C
But
that's
what
this
is
so
so
this
is
like
the
properties
again,
if
you
notice
in
the
in
the
the
type
a
lot
of
it
is
the
the
public
gap,
farm
farm
of
forests
and
actually
salt,
they're,
all
farms,
and
then
there's
some
vacant
stuff
and
and
then
there's
a
few
things
that
are
municipal.
You
know
the
town
in
the
city
and
then
one
pieces,
University
of
New,
Haven,
I,
don't
even
know
what
that
is.
I
know
what
the
union
is
about,
what
the
land
is
that
so
so
this
is
just
you
know.
A
A
Lot
of
there's
a
lot
of
good
work
here
and
it
provides
the
basic
now
we
can
go
in
once
we
have
this
go
starting
asking
questions
like
we
just
did
right.
We
don't
have
the
answer
so
today,
but
it's
actually
not
that
far
off
I
mean
it's
like
I
said
it's
it's
within
a
percent
or
two
which
to
me
is
not
too
bad
for
that
right.
A
But
I
would
like
to
quickly
address
the
questions
from
the
text
team
and
then
we
have
to
do
a
scheduled
for
release
for
that
first
round
right,
so
those
are
two
things
I'd
like
to
get
done
so
time
on
the
first
one.
You
had
update
the
open
space
map-
page
24.
Maybe
I
should
stop
sharing
here
and
do
you
want
to
bring
back
up
the
yeah.
G
Okay,
this
is
the
page
24
math
question
that
the
reason
I
was
asking
this
is
this:
is
the
latest
version
we
have
from
Jenna
right?
Are
you
developing
I
guess
the
question
of
Michelle
is?
Are
you
developing
your
own
map
based
on
all
these
other
discussions,
or
are
we
just
gonna?
Are
we
in
a
position
here,
but
this
is
the
latest
and
greatest,
and
that
or
do
we
have
enough
information
to
go
to
Jenna,
to
ask
her
to
update
this
with
any
changes
that
we
would
like
to
see?
My.
G
C
I'm
also
seriously,
considering
just
you
know,
buy
my
own
permit
for
a
year
or
seeing
if
we
can,
if
I
can
actually
use
the
groton
system
to
play
with,
you
know
play
with
it
myself
other
than
asking
Jenna,
because
I
think
we
I
think
we
want
to
play
with
it
a
lot
not
just
like.
If
we
give
it
to
her,
can
you
do
these
things
clicks
it?
Oh,
maybe
we
should
do
this
differently.
We
can't
do
that
with
her.
We
can't
keep.
C
G
G
C
Is
right,
this
was
the
question,
is
what
what
of
that
spreadsheet?
Do
we
want
to
include
in
here
and
do
we
want
to
include
the
parcel
numbers
and
the
addresses
do
want
to
include
you
know?
So
it's
it's
a
quote
question
of
both.
What
columns
do
we
want
to
include
and
what
rows
do
want
to
include
we
want
to
have
it
broken
down
into
those
different
sets
like
like
do
you
know
like
the
sets
that
are
similar
to
what's
in
the
text?
You
know
this.
C
Is
you
know
this
is
the
actual
parcel
number
with
those
things
that
are
in
there
and
then
also
have
you
know
this
is
a
dedicate.
This
is
the
managed
or
whatever
how
you
know.
We
need
to
answer
this
question
and
I.
Don't
think
we
I,
don't
think
we
we
want
to
hold
up
the
release
of
this
thing.
To
answer
that
question.
C
A
My
thought
on
that
would
be
that
the
list
of
open
space
that
would
result
in
the
map
would
be
public
information,
because
it's
open
space
right,
I
I,
think
that
perhaps
we
could
put
an
example.
You
know
like
here
are
the
columns
right
and
the
categories,
not
necessarily
all
the
details
and
say
it
will
be
provided
in
the
final
version,
but
list
I
mean
if
it's
town,
state
city,
your
property,
there's
no
problem,
saying
here's
that
property,
here's
the
parcel!
A
Here's
the
acres,
you
know
even
the
reference
to
the
the
you
know,
the
POC
D
is
fine
and
the
address
is
fine,
I
mean
I,
don't
think.
There's
any
I
mean
some
of
the
types
and
the
comments
could
be
left
off.
So
my
recommendation
would
be
to
provide
a
shortened
version
of
the
spreadsheet,
which
has
the
categories
which
is
kind
of
like
compressed
column.
A
I
guess
would
be
the
major
different
categories
and
then
provide
that
to
Tom
to
be
able
to
put
in
there
similar
to
the
draft.
So
let.
C
G
C
C
D
A
G
C
G
I
think
this
is
good
enough
to
the
way
it
is
because
this
is
all
stuff
and
I'm
aware
of
the
last
one
was
the
breaking
things
into
the
top
of
P
OCD
identified
areas
in
generic
and
then
having.
The
second
part
was
the
updated
from
the
parcel
team
and
image
completely
complete.
The
green
belts
I
think
it's
free
enough
at
this
point
to
I'll
just
make
a
statement
in
here
saying
that
this
is
still
under
development
based
on.
C
G
G
G
G
G
Know
the
only
thing
I'm
really
gonna
be
tweaking
is
the
stuff
that
is,
that
brain
brought
up.
That's
the
only
real
true
writing.
I
have
to
do
here.
The
rest
of
this
is
all
cutting
and
pasting
and
putting
things
in,
but
it's
those
two
lines
that
Brady
had
recommended
at
the
very
beginning
in
the
executive.
A
So
we
really
have
three
things
it's
time
he
has
that
done
in
the
next
couple
of
days,
then
I
still
think
that
I
owe
it
to
all
of
us
to
say
guys.
Just
look
at
it
one
more
time.
Number
two
is
we
need.
We
have
the
updated
list
of
phase
one
reviewers
all
right
based
upon
today's
discussion
and
who's
got.
That
is
that
is
that
you
Bruce
or
tom,
has
that
didn't
keep
in
track
of
Alan
I.
B
A
So
we'll
need
that
and
then
the
distribution
mechanism,
and
what,
if
I,
do
that
offline
with
Bruce,
rather
than
taking
your
guys
time
right,
it
would
need
a
cover
letter,
maybe
a
posting
in
the
web
site
whatever.
So
that's
a
mechanical,
so
I
I
would
say
that
if
we
had
a
if
time
would
get
it
out
next
couple
of
days,
then
let's
say
by
the
end
of
the
week,
everyone
would
take
a
look
at
it.
You
know
by
the
target,
the
eighth
that
says.
Potentially
we
could
have
a
release
date.
A
C
A
C
G
So
if
I
can
get
this
thing
out
to
you
know,
I
think
if
Kristen
and
and
if
you're
available
either
tomorrow
afternoon
or
Wednesday
morning,
you
check
your
schedules
and
I
can
have
an
I,
give
a
commitment
to
Larry.
As
far
as
getting
that
done
this
week,
either
Tuesday
afternoon,
like
4
o'clock,
ish
I
can
have
everything
ready
or
you
want
to
do
it
first
thing
Wednesday
morning.
C
A
I
C
G
Text
you'll
have
it
available.
If
you
have
some
kind
of
major
issue
with
it,
I
mean
right
or
if
you
want
to
change
it,
you
might
guess:
ok,
I
think
you're
gonna
find
it
in
pretty
good
shape
and
that's
the
discretion
of
Larry
because
he's
also
a
chair
here.
He
can
use
executive
discretion
here
in
regarding
if
he
feels
it
needs
to
bend
easily,
send
it
back
to
the
texting
for
Reeve
and
me.
C
C
A
C
E
A
G
D
G
Think
you're
not
gonna,
get
that
much
of
a
response
is
because
of
the
time
that
they're
gonna
want
to
take
a
look
at
it
relative
to
who's.
Gonna
have
the
authority
to
get
comments
back
by,
but
I'm
just
from
a
reality
perspective
we
can
I
have
no
problem
with
the
timeline
sending
it
out.
They
we've
done
our
best
to
give
people
heads
up
to
this
as
best
we
can.
Okay,
but
just
realities,
I'm,
not
expecting
a
lot
of
comments,
backed
by
the
20
and.
E
And
the
other
thing
to
point
out:
it
has
been
a
matter
of
public
record
because
every
time
we've
been
meeting
and
the
draft
has
been
set
out
in
the
minutes-
it's
it's
in.
It's
been
in
the
public
domain,
so
if
they
were
really
keyed
up
about
it,
they
may
have
already
like,
for
example,
GCA
has
had
a
ton
of
input.
Cuz
they're,
very,
very
you
know
into
it.
So.
C
To
dress
chance
coming,
okay,
I
have
a
caveat.
You
know
we'd,
like
we'd,
like
the
comments
by
June
26.
However,
if
you
know
you
know,
if
we
will
accept
comments
and-
and
you
know,
we're
not
gonna
promise
we'll
take
them
into
account,
but
if
you
give
us
the
guild
until
it's
later,
we
may
still
be
able
to
address
them
or
something
like
that.