
►
From YouTube: Groton Historic District Commission 1/18/22
Description
Groton, Connecticut municipal meeting: Historic District Commission January 18, 2022. Click on the link below to view the agenda.
https://www.agendasuite.org/iip/groton/file/getfile/60624
A
All
right,
so
I
will
call
the
meeting
to
order
on
january
18th
at
709
and
I
will
seat.
Let's
see
I'll,
see
everybody
so
I'll,
see
max
furbani
and
bill
for
eric
and
john
for
don
and
then
if
todd
joins
us,
he
joins
us
and
there's
no
call
to
read.
So
we
just
have
two
continuations,
but
because
I'm
at
home
I
don't
have
the
agenda
up.
So
I'm.
B
This
meeting
historic
district
commission
will
take
place
in
webinar
format
through
zoom.
The
chair
of
the
commission
is
sarah
moriarty
hosted
the
webinars,
the
building
officials
staff
attending
this
meeting,
including
peters
of
english,
linda
galetta.
Anyone
speaking
should
state
their
names
prior
to
speaking
each
time.
B
The
panelists
in
this
webinar
meeting
will
be
the
commission
members
of
the
building
staff
panelists,
who
would
like
to
comment
on
an
item
should
indicate
such
by
using
the
icon
to
raise
hand
at
the
bottom
of
the
screen
after
a
panelist
raises
a
hand
they'll
be
able
to
comment
one
at
a
time
when
called
upon
by
the
chairperson
panelists
should
mute.
Their
microphones
until
called
upon
a
panel
is
calling
into
this
meeting
by
telephone.
B
They
raise
or
lower
their
hand
by
pressing
star
9
to
mute
or
unreal
call
for
a
star
six
to
make
a
motion.
A
second
motion.
Commission
members
can
raise
a
hand
to
be
acknowledged
by
the
host
or
chair
to
vote
on
a
motion.
Commission
members
will
be
called
upon
individually
by
the
chair
to
vote.
The
public
can
participate
in
the
meeting
during
the
public
communications
agenda
item.
B
The
public
will
be
asked
to
raise
their
hand
during
public
communications
if
they
want
to
speak
at
this
time
by
using
the
icon
to
raise
hand
at
the
bottom
of
the
screen.
The
public
will
be
called
upon
by
the
host
one
at
a
time
and
will
be
able
to
speak
during
this
time.
Attendees
must
identify
themselves
before
speaking.
C
A
B
B
E
A
A
E
I
did
get
an
email
and
he's
looking
into
using
wooden
fencing
for
the
front,
like
maybe
the
sides
you
know
up
near
the
front,
but
he
was
still
pricing
that
out
and
I
think
that's
why
he's
not
coming
to
the
meetings
is
he
just
has
nothing
new
okay,
but
yeah.
A
Okay,
we'll
kick
that
can
down
the
road
till
the
next
meeting.
If
he
doesn't
come
tonight,
htc
21-58,
55,
west,
bane,
56
west
main
street.
I
do
believe
I
saw
that
gentleman
in
the
audience.
A
A
A
So
I
believe
what
peter
was
saying:
is
you
have
the
option
to
make
your
presentation
tonight
with
the
four
of
us
or
you
can
continue
until
the
next
meeting
when
there
may
be
more
commission
members.
F
I
have
no
problem
going
forward.
Okay,.
A
F
Will
you
be
able
to
control
the
drawings
and
point
them
out
for
them
or.
B
F
F
Do
I
start,
or
I'm
not
sure,
okay,
for
the
record,
my
name
is
stephanie
sharpless,
I'm
the
architect
working
for
the
syllabus
family
on
mystic
pizza.
F
What
this
project
basically
entails
at
this
point
is
that
they
were
hoping
to
provide
some
outdoor
space
since
it's
such
a
huge
thing
nowadays,
especially
in
mystic,
and
especially
this
culvert
thing
that
we're
having
and
the
only
place
that
we
could
provide
their
open
space
with.
B
F
Happening
of
the
building
was
the
best
possible
solution
and
providing
access
to
it
from
the
second
level,
dining
room
that
already
exists,
the
other
app.
The
other
thing
we
would
like
to
do
is
change
the
existing
windows,
there's
five
or
five
of
them.
That
would
like
to
change,
make
them
slightly
larger
and
provide
folding
windows.
Here
then
only
windows
or
bifold
windows,
so
we
can
get
the
maximum
opened
area
and
provide
the
second
level
dining
room
as
an
indoor
outdoor
type
of
space.
F
What
are
you
seeing
now
on
the
west?
Elevation,
that's
coming
down
the
hill
and
the
opposite
side
of
the
salvation
is
where
the
monument
is
or
the
statue.
I'm
not
sure
what
you
want
to
call
it.
F
F
The
size
of
the
deck,
which
was
one
of
the
reasons
for
back
again
here
because
of
no
dimensions
on
the
size
of
the
deck,
is
29
six
inches
by
21
10
inches,
it's
approximately
600
square
feet
and
the
reason
it's
it's
being
controlled.
The
size
is
being
controlled,
basically
by
the
amount
of
space
that
we
have.
It's
like.
I
said
it's
being
constructed
over
the
to
go
area
and
the
existing
kitchen
area.
F
Now
the
existing
kitchen
area,
you
can
see
it's
right
below
the
food
systems
that
you
see
portraying
through
the
roof
right
now
and
that's
why
we're
staying
away
from
that
and
again,
the
actual
size
may
be
slightly
smaller
once
we
start
doing
some
of
the
demolition,
depending
what
we
find
and
see
how
the
structure,
how
we
can
structurally
secure
everything
properly
we're
working
with
existing
conditions
in
an
old
building.
F
F
The
what
you
see
there
basically
is
the
sliding
doors
that
we're
providing
the
six
foot
wide
anderson
doors
that
will
be
accessible
from
the
existing
dining
room
on
the
second
level
and
the
patio
or
the
deck.
Whatever
you
want
to
call,
it
would
be
slightly,
I
would
say,
approximately
14
inches
higher
than
the
existing
floor
of
the
dining
room
and
that's
because
of
the
different
elevations
that
we
have
within
the
finished
floors
of
the
existing
building,
to
give
it
the
feel
of
the
deck.
F
That's
a
very
nautical
looking
rail
and
a
very
minimum
rail,
so
it
doesn't
stand
out
like
a
sore
thumb
and
people
can
and
you
can
everybody's
sitting
there.
You
can
see
right
through
it.
You
can
see
downtown
and
the
hill
as
you're
coming
down
from
the
church
behind
you
now
the
next
well,
can
you
go
to
the
next
elevation
the
front
elevation?
F
That's
the
existing!
That's
the
low
roof
that
we
were
talking
about
removing
and
you
can
see
the
existing
trim
line
that
goes
across.
It
will
be
maintaining
that
the
law
is
the
proposed
elevation.
F
What
you're
seeing
is
the
blue
is
the
existing
awning
that
exists
there,
the
different
kind
of
blue
again
the
turquoise
is
existing.
Also
in
the
panels,
and
then
we
have
the
glass
panels
that
and
the
door
that
enters
into
the
space
were
talking
about
behind
it.
F
You
can
see
us
what
we
call
we're,
calling
a
screen
wall
and
we're
putting
that
to
screen
the
existing
fans
start
protrading
through
the
roof
for
the
pizza
ovens
and
the
grill
area,
and
if
you
notice
there's
a
dotted
line,
that's
showing
there,
that's
the
that's
the
existing
slope
of
the
roof.
F
That's
there
now,
so
we're
keeping
it
as
low
as
possible.
Six
foot,
six
height
maximum
and
just
enough
so
we
are
able
to
maintain
visual
visually
hide
the
fans
behind
you,
and
hopefully,
some
of
the
noise
that
those
fans
provide
and
the
windows
that
you
see
on
the
proposed
one
is
almost
the
same
size,
but
the
same
look
as
the
existing
windows.
F
The
only
thing
is
the
way
they
operate.
It's
different
and
instead
of
bifold
they're,
going
to
be
folding
up,
like
almost
think
of
it
as
a
garage
door,
and
that
will
give
us
a
full
opening
of
the
almost
floor
to
ceiling
type
of
opening
and
where
the
opening
would
be.
F
As
a
guard,
rail
will
provide
the
same
kind
of
rail
again.
The
stainless
steel
rod
rail
that
we
have
on
the
deck,
so
it's
a
continuation
and
that
will
give
the
feeling
of
an
indoor
outdoor
space
when
you're
standing
there.
You
can
see
that
basically
and
on
a
perspective
that
we
did
with
the
picture
on
it
and
you
can
get
a
better
idea
of
what
we're
talking
about
there.
C
Yeah
and
I've
been
watching
the
whole
time,
but
I
I
wasn't
let
in
as
a
panelist,
but
I've
heard
mr
well
I'll
try
to
pronounce
your
last
name,
but
I've
heard
everything
you've
said
and
I've
looked
at
your
pictures.
F
Basically
again
I
mean
it's:
we
try
to
minimize
whatever
we're
doing
there.
So
if
you
look
at
the
existing
and
the
proposed,
yes,
obviously,
there's
changes
but
we're
trying
to
make
minimum
changes
and
again
this
sloping
move
that
we're
taking
out
was
something
that
was
presented
on
in
the
past,
and
you
know
it
does.
I
believe
it
gives
a
better
look
by
just
taking
it
and
gives
it
gives
that
depth
as
you
go
by
the
street
without
that
roof
there.
F
F
Basically,
the
size
is
approximately
the
same
size
and
the
reason
for
the
size
of
the
windows
is
that,
even
though
we're
trying
to
give
get
the
opening
as
large
as
possible,
we're
trying
also
to
use
it
windows
that
are
not
made
to
water
because
they
get
very
expensive
and
also
there's
an
existing
structural
system
that
was
introduced
there.
I
would
say,
I'm
not
sure,
five
or
six
years
ago,
and
that
limits
the
amount
of
opening
we
can
provide
without
modifying
that,
so
we're
trying
not
to
modify
the
existing
structure
conditions.
F
F
F
Now
this
is
the
existing
site
plan.
Now
you
can
see
it's
a
very
tight
site
plan,
but
on
the
side
where
the
bank
used
to
be
there's
a
11
foot
right
away,
that
belongs
to
my
client
and
some
additional
right-of-way
that
belongs
to
the
bank.
That's
for
the
vehicular
traffic
that
goes
in
the
back
parking
area
up
against
the
building.
F
You
notice
we're
we're
showing
some
two-seater
tables
and
the
reason
we're
doing
that
is
because
by
code
we
have
to
provide
some
handicap
outdoor
space
since
we're
providing
outdoor
space
on
the
second
level,
and
we
cannot
provide
handicap
accessibility
there,
we're
providing
some
of
that
outdoor
sitting
area
along
along
that
side
of
the
right-of-way.
F
F
Now
this
is
the
proposed
one.
This
is
with
the
roof:
slo
shopping,
roof
coming
off
and
we're
providing
that
additional
rail
to
provide
the
safety
that
we
need.
So
people
don't
hop
off
the
roof,
and
those
are
the
folding
windows
that
we
were
proposing
now
granted
they're
showing
larger
here
than
we're,
showing
them
on
the
elevation.
F
We
would
love
to
get
them
this
size
and
there's
no
way.
I
believe
we
can
do
it
because,
since
we've
done
this,
we've
done
some
preliminary
exploration
with
demolition
and
the
existing
structural
conditions
will
not
allow
us
to
make
the
noodles
that
size
and
be
slightly
smaller,
like
we're,
showing
them
on
the
elevations.
F
One
of
the
other
things
that
was
in
question
in
the
previous
meeting
was
the
shading
rail
shading
sails
that
we
had.
We
decided
to
take
those
off
not
introduce
them.
At
this
point,
like
the
client
said,
there's
going
to
be
limited
time,
that's
going
to
be
used
either
because
of
weather,
whether
it's
raining
or
being
in
the
winters,
so
there's
no
sense
of
putting
him
up
and
again
his
intent
is
basically
to
say.
Yes,
we
do
have
outdoor
space
as
a
restaurant
and
be
competitive
with
the
rest
of
the
restaurants
within
the
region.
F
What
you
see
here
is
basically
the
rail
we'll
be
talking
about
the
top
rail
or,
as
you
said,
the
hinge
rail
where
people
will
be
holding
will
be
finished
with
the
wood
finish
and
the
rest
will
be.
The
stainless
steel
rod
rails
that
you
see
in
most
areas
in
mystic
as
part
of
the
nautical
thing,
the
pictures
next
pictures
you
see.
Basically
the
windows
we're
talking
about
granted.
This
one
is
opening
in,
but
we're
going
to
be
opening
ours
out.
F
The
reason
we're
not
putting
out
is
because
they
are
opening
in
they're
going
to
interfere
with
the
proposed
rail
that
we're
doing
so
they're
going
to
be
hitting
the
rails.
So
you
they
won't
work.
But
if
you
go
to
the
next
one,
you
can
see
how
they
look
and
they
open
to
the
out
to
the
outside.
F
So
the
other,
the
other
question
that
or
I
should
say
request
it-
was
to
continue
that
trim
work
all
the
way
to
the
back
of
the
deck
we
did
that
we
tried
to
look
at
it.
It
just
didn't,
look
right,
it
overpowered
the
whole
building,
I
think,
but
more
important.
F
Right,
if
we,
if
we
had
continued
this
rail
all
the
way
across
to
the
back
of
the
roof,
it
just
overpowered
the
whole
elevation,
and
not
only
that,
but
I
felt
that
it
was
gonna
cause
all
kinds
of
issues
with
water,
snow
drifts,
ice
wells
and
everything,
because
if
we
had
provided
something
across
it,
snow
would
accumulate
behind
that
end
on
the
flat
roof
that
existed.
That
exists
there
now
and
the
excessive
heat
from
the
kitchen
would
be
melting
the
snow
and
then
it
would
freeze.
F
It
would
cause
all
kinds
of
water
issues
for
us
in
the
world,
so
not
even
going
to
create
an
issue
that
does
not
exist
already
and
the
fact
that
it
overpowered
the
whole
building.
I
think
you
know
we
just
wanted
to
minimize
it,
and
we
just
kept
it
only
where
the
deck
is.
F
D
One
thing
this
is
max
leonard.
I
think
it's
a
really
cool
idea,
and
this
is
like
one
of
the
first
buildings
that
you
notice
when
you're
going
into
downtown
from
that
direction,
and
it's
a
mystic
staple
for
sure,
so
I
think
it
could
be
really
cool
one.
One
thing
I
wanted
to
ask
the
committee
was
how
we've
voted
on
this
type
of
guardrail
in
the
past.
It
seems
pretty
modern
to
me.
D
I
know
it's
kind
of
designed
to
be
more
low
vis,
but
I'm
just
curious.
If
you
know
we
wouldn't
go
with
something
more
traditional,
some
something
would
or
or
what
we've
said
about
this
it's.
I
know
it's
a
common
common
handrail,
but
wanted
to
see
what
the
committee
has
done
about
this
in
the
past.
We
have
any
experience
with
it.
C
When
I
made
an
application
for
factory
square,
we
had
cable
rails
across
the
front,
so
all
the
garage
doors
that
were
put
in
we
ultimately
eliminated
them
because
we
reconfigured
the
garage
doors
and
the
garage
doors
between
the
rails.
But
I
don't
personally
have
an
objection
to
cable
rails.
Quite
frankly,
I'm
kind
of
tired
of
the
conventional
picket
type
rails
that
we
see
all
over
the
place
and
I
think
that
it's
acceptable
to
use.
One
of
these,
in
my
opinion,.
C
The
rails
that
go
up
the
stairs
and
everything
are
a
conventional
picket.
It's
that
indetect
stuff.
You
know
yeah
nicer,
looking.
A
And
then
I
think
the
condos
are
also
cable
or
some
of
the
condos.
H
This
is
john
and
frankly,
I'd
like
to
see
if
the
cable
rails
are
on
the
standard,
because
that's
my
concern
looking
at
the
project,
because
I
think
it's
too
modern
and
I
think
that
building
that
that's
in
it's
the
first
building
anybody
sees
coming
in
the
mystic
off
allen
street.
So
I'd
prefer
to
err
on
the
side
of
caution
on
that
one.
F
Can
I
comment
on
that
sure
we
did
look
at
the
regular
standard
rail.
It
was
somehow
overpowering
the
elevation
because
it's
it
would
take
about
20
some
linear
feet
on
both
sides
of
it,
and
that's
why
we
went
with
this
to
minimize
attracting
the
eye.
At
that
point,
we
just
want
the
whole
building
to
be
one
rather
than
a
piece
of
the
building
being
more
attracting
the
eye
too.
So
that's
the
only
reason
we
want
for
that
too.
I
mean
the
way
of
rest
is
real.
C
You
don't
see
the
horizontal
cables,
you
see
more
of
the
particles,
so
I
understand.
Well.
I
guess
I
don't
understand
your
concern
about
modernity,
because
I
I
think
that
architectural
architecture
in
general
is
a
dynamic
process
and
so
the
buildings
that
they
built
and
I've
said
this
before
the
buildings
that
they
built
and
mystic
in
1700.
C
Look
nothing
like
the
buildings
that
they
built
in
1800,
or
they
not
that
much
like
them,
but
they're
all
acceptable
because
things
change,
and
I
I
think
that
the
cable
rail,
I
don't
even
think
you'll
you'll,
even
see
that
much
of
it,
but
I
prefer
it
to
the
to
the
picket,
and
I
also
think
that
when
you
look
at.
D
H
G
D
Think
they
will
be
low
vis,
which
is
which
is
nice,
but.
H
D
I
said
you
know:
it's
you've
got
on
the
left,
there
you've
got
the
statue
and
then
you've
got
this
building
which
a
lot
of
people
come
to
mystic
to
go
to
on
its
own,
and
I
think
again
I
think
it's
a
really
cool
idea.
I
did
just
confirm
that
the
standard
has
pickets
all
around.
It
does
not
have
cable.
H
Yeah-
and
this
is
john
again
like
I
said
my
concern-
is
it's
a
high
visibility
building
from
multiple
you
know
from
a
couple
different
intersections,
like
max's
people
go
to
take
their
picture
in
front
of
it?
I
just
I
it's
present
design,
I'm
not
completely
comfortable
with.
I
think
it's
a
little.
It
doesn't
fit
with
the
rest
of
downtown.
I
can't
think
of
the
building
that
it
really
fits
in
with.
D
A
Stefan,
can
I
ask
you
one
question:
you
were
going
through
your
application.
You
were
on
the
west
elevation,
it
were
you
changing
windows
out
on
the
west
elevation.
F
F
F
G
The
question
I
had-
and
I
didn't
hear
it
in
this
presentation-
was
the
those
two
random
tables
for
that
we're
going
to
be,
I
believe,
on
the
side
of
the
the
old
bank.
That's
now
a
bar
brewpub
is
that
still
in
this
application.
A
F
In
there,
what
we're
providing
is
possibly
if
you
notice
some
planters
on
either
side
of
them,
just
to
define
the
space
where
they're
going
to
be
and
again
those
are
there
just
because
of
code
requirements.
We
really
don't
anticipate
many
people
sitting.
There
should
probably
find
people
from
the
brewery
probably
sitting
there
more
than
our
customers,
because
the
brewery
has
tables
throughout
the
form
of
that
building
there,
but.
F
It
is
it,
but
I
again
I
mean
that's
another
reason
why
the
planters
are
there,
so
that
you
know
it
gives
it
some
protection,
but
it's
not
a
driveway
where
people
coming
in
and
out
on
a
regular
basis.
It's
very,
very
low,
vehicular
traffic
there,
if
any
during
the
day.
Actually
it's
only
between
shifts,
I
believe,
and
maybe
some
deliveries
when
they
make
and
the
width
is
wide
enough
to
accommodate
that
there
should
be
no
issue
whatsoever.
F
My
clients,
part
of
the
property,
is
approximately
11
feet
and
the
rest
of
is
another
10
feet
or
so
you're
talking
about
18
feet
at
least
width.
There.
H
F
F
I
don't
see
any
reason
for
that.
I'll
be
honest
with
you,
I
mean
if
we
have
to,
we
have
to
request
to
allow
to
us
to
put
neighbors
on
the
sidewalk
on
the
bank
street
side.
We
can
do
that.
Also,
it's
just
that
presently
there's
a
lot
of
outdoors
sitting
there
with
the
existing
brewery,
so
we
figure
it's
gonna
blend
in
more
than
anything.
D
I
mean
we
should
be
looking
at
these
from
a
historic
district
viewpoint.
I
don't
think
it
really
affects
you
know
what's
under
our
purview,
but
you
know
it's
just
my
opinion.
H
F
F
We're
trying
to
you
know
provide
all
the
requirements
as
this
if
you
notice
the
brewery
next
door,
that
is
not
ada
compliance
non-versatile
side,
because
it's
all
in
different
levels,
so
I
mean
I'm
sure
they
got
a
modification
from
the
state,
and
you
know
I
mean
if
that
that
becomes
an
issue.
I
was
getting
a
building
from
it.
Yes,
of
course,
we
want
to
go
to
the
state
and
get
a
modification
we
have
to
for
the
ada
compliance
and
not
provide
them
at
all,
we're
just
trying
to
make
sure
we
comply
with
everything.
F
At
this
point,
that's
all
I
personally
don't
see
any
issue
with
them
being
there
to
be
honest
with
you,
they're
going
to
blend
in,
you
won't
even
notice
them
with
the
rest
of
the
sitting,
outdoor
ceiling
that
exists
there
already
and
as
far
as
being
an
active
driveway,
I
was
there
for
hours.
I've
never
seen
one
car
go
in
and
out
of
there
they
all
use
the
bank
street
side
an
entrance
from
the
back
side.
They
never
use
the
front
side
because
of
the
traffic
on
the
front
of
the
building.
Anyway,.
A
D
Sounds
like
the
the
tables
are
out
of
our
scope.
G
And
did
you?
Is
there
a
list
of
materials?
That
was
something
we
asked.
I
just
don't
know
if
I
missed
that
as
well.
F
G
But
the
door
on
the
second
floor
getting
to.
C
C
Stefan
are
the
the
you
you
noted.
There
were
two
sizes
of
windows
that
you're
rendering
I
showed
those
fold
out
windows
at
one
size,
but
then
in
fact
you
can't
put
them
in
at
that
size.
So
it
does
your
other
drawing
that
shows
the
windows
that
their
actual
proposed
size
are.
Those
sizes
called
out
in
your
application.
F
I
did
not
call
those
out
on
the
elevation.
No,
I
did
not.
There
are
seven
foot
three
high
by
six
foot.
Four,
the
standard
windows
from
this
particular
manufacturer
and
those
are
the
ones
we're
using
they're,
going
to
be
approximately
12
inches
from
the
floor
so
because
of
the
header,
the
existing
header
that
exists
above.
A
So
I'm
just
gonna
kind
of
go
back
a
little
because
we
went
on
a
couple
different
subjects.
I
I
personally
don't
necessarily
have
any
problem
with
the
rail
system.
You
know
it's
not
necessarily
a
historic,
historic
building,
so
you
know
it
probably
seems
to
fit
and
we'll
have
low
visibility.
As
is
max
noted.
I'm
still.
I
still
have
the
same
concerns
that
I've
voiced
in
the
same
meeting
or
the
earlier
meeting,
which
is
you
know
it's
it's
it's
a
bit
hodgepodgey.
A
You
know
we
already
have
various
windows
and
it's
it's
a
bit
of
an
oddball
and
I
feel
like
we're
we're
making
it
a
little
bit
more
so
with
this
particular
modification
and
then
to
go
over
the
seating
piece.
As
max
said,
I
don't
think
that
we
have
any
jurisdiction
on
that
exterior
side
seating,
because
it's
all
movable
if
they
change
it
to
something,
that's
fixed,
then
he
would
have
to
come
back
to
us
for
that.
But
if
it's
just
movable
tables
chairs
and
planters,
that's
not
that's
not
anything
that
we
can
opine
on.
A
I
don't
know
if
anyone
has
any
other
comments
or
questions
or
concerns
for
the
applicant.
C
Well,
with
regard
to
the
you're
feeling
that
it
looks
a
little
bit
of
a
hodgepod
like
a
hodgepodge,
I
certainly
don't
think
it's
any
worse
than
it
is
now
and
in
fact
I
think
it's
better
looking
now,
because
I
think
that
that
angled
slope
roof
that
heads
to
the
west.
If
you
go
back
to
one
of
those
earlier
photographs
and
shows
it,
I
think
it's
pretty
awful.
Looking.
A
H
And
sarah,
I
second
that,
like
I
said,
I
think
it's
it's
too
prominent
of
a
building
coming
in
the
town
the
to
make
it
any
more
hodgepodge
than
it
is.
I
mean
it's.
It's
the
first
thing,
anybody's
gonna
see
coming
off
allen
street
in
the
downtown,
and
I
think
that's
that's
something.
We've
got
to
give
a
lot
of
weight
to.
D
Stefan,
could
you
just
share
again,
I
know
you
had
mentioned
you'd
considered
looking
at
you
know
more
traditional
railing
system.
Why
is
it
that
you
ended
up
going
with
the
the
cable.
F
Again,
the
cable
is
a
lot
less
visible
as
you're
coming
down
the
street.
Basically
don't
even
see
the
cable
itself,
you
see
the
top
wood
rail
and
possibly
the
posts
coming
down
anything
else
which
take
away
from
the
existing
trim
work.
F
That's
there
now,
and
that
would
make
it
a
lot
more
busier
more
complicated,
and
that's
the
only
that's
the
only
reason
I
mean
presently,
if
you
look
at
it,
if
you
look
at
the
building,
that
building
was
a
flat
roof
from
what
you
see
here
and
we
you
know
it
was
the
slow
proof
was
introduced
to
connect
it
to
the
other
building,
basically
we're
taking
it
back
to
the
flat
roof
and
maintaining
that
framework.
That
was
there
before.
C
I
I
also
think
that
having
a
normal
picket
balustrade
up
where
that
person
is
drawn
in
I
and
behind
the
glass,
I
think,
is
not
a
a
notable
architectural
standard.
I
think
it
might
look
rather
odd,
as
opposed
to
something
that
I
really
can't
see
when
those
windows
are
closed.
D
D
I
wasn't
even
really
when
I
my
concern,
wasn't
even
really
about
that
section,
but
the
one
in
in
front
is
there
like
a
certain
height
requirement
that
you
had
to
meet
and
that's
why
you're
going
above
the
trim.
C
So
I
also
think
that
seeing
the
top
of
a
picket
balustrade
behind
that
parapet,
I
think,
is
also
going
to
look
rather
odd.
Gonna
look
cut
off
as
opposed
to
a
horizontal
or
more
horizontal
type
rail
system.
That's
my
personal
opinion.
I
mean,
I
think
the
building
looks
much
better
in
this
iteration
here
than
it
currently
looks.
D
C
Agree-
and
it
is
it
is,
you
know-
I
mean
I
think,
you're
right
stephanie,
it's
two
buildings
that
were
at
some
point
joined
at
least
as
one
entity,
and
perhaps
an
argument
could
be
made
that
it
was
somewhat
artfully
done.
I
mean
the
fenestration
on
the
front
and
the
windows
are
in
part.
They
were,
they
differed
between
the
two
buildings
and
because
of
the
change
in
elevation.
C
It
makes
it
all
the
more
difficult
to
try
to
match
them
up
or
regularize
them.
So
you're
dealing
you're
dealing
with
some
architectural
challenges
for
sure,
and
I
can
understand
sarah's
concern
and
and
john's
too
that
it
it
may
look
a
little
bit.
C
D
F
We
could,
but
I
think
it
would
be
too
massive.
Looking
for
the
building
below
it,
I
mean,
I
think
it
works
well
presently
and
in
the
past,
when
they
just
left
the
trim
as
a
parapet
there,
because
we
need
to
go
higher
for
safety
reasons.
That's
the
only
reason
we're
introducing
the
cable
railing
and
we
try
to
minimize
whatever
I
mean
we
could
do
glass
which,
but
it's
way
too
modern.
F
I
think
I
thought
nautical
being
a
mistake-
would
be
best
using
the
rail
system
to
be
honest
with
you
and
finish
it
off
with
a
nice,
keep
wood
as
a
handrail
of
the
top
fit.
C
I
think
you
also
have
to
take
into
account
the
fact
that
if
you
go
up
to
42
inches
and
you're
sitting
at
a
table,
there
you're
going
to
feel
a
little
bit
hemmed
in.
That's
what
I
thought
you
know.
C
If
you
go
into
some
of
the
older
mill
buildings
that
had
higher
sills,
they
don't
make
great
interior
space
because
you
really
can't
see
out
if
you're
sitting
down.
F
In
the
guardrail,
in
this
case,
or
should
say
the
rail
itself,
it's
not
going
to
be
42
inches
from
floor
to
ceiling.
Actually
here
it's
even
half
of
it.
If
you
look
at
closely
you're
going
to
see
a
dotted
brown
line,
that
that
indicates
where
the
finished
floor
of
the
deck
is
approximately
so
more
than
half
of
that
is
the
existing
parapet.
F
So
beyond
the
parapet,
you're
gonna
have
maybe
a
foot
and
a
half
of
the
guardrail
and
it
set
in
another
foot
and
a
half
so
actually,
as
you're
walking
on
the
side,
you
won't
even
see
that
what
you're
going
to
see
is
the
parapet.
The
only
time
you're
going
to
see
the
guard,
rail
or
the
rail
itself
would
be
standing
far
away
across
the
street,
so
you're
never
even
going
to
see
that
as
you
walk
in
the
sidewalks.
A
No,
stefan
do
you
have
anything
else
that
you'd
like
to
add.
F
Any
questions
I'll
answer
them
again
other
than
that
again,
it's
a
very
simple
thing:
we're
not
introducing
that
much
to
it,
rather
than
like
I
said,
taking
off
the
shopping
roof
and
putting
a
deck
there
and
replacing
the
windows,
I
mean
it's
a
very
simple
thing:
okay,.
A
All
right,
thank
you,
hd
does
anyone
else,
have
anything?
A
H
C
G
A
Moriarty
I
so
hdc
21-54
is
closed
deliberations
on
htc
21-50.
C
A
A
A
All
right,
all
in
favor,
brady,
aye,
ferguson.
G
A
D
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna,
say
aye
goodrich.
A
Moriarty,
no,
the
application
is
approved
all
rights,
pre-application
hearings.
A
No
all
right
public
communications.
B
G
H
A
Moriarty,
I
the
minutes
are
approved
old
business.
So
there
is
a
piece
of
old
business
that
I
want
to
discuss,
but
I'm
going
to
table
it
until
next
meeting.
I
want
don
and
bonnie
here
as
well.
A
The
town
attorney
had
reviewed
the
meeting
that
we
did
that
we
had
when
we
voted
on
the
bank
and
they
asked
he
asked
us
to
take
a
re-vote
on
it
that
he
he
had
a
concern
that
you
know
eric
had
an
interest
in
it
and
he
just
wanted
us
to
take
a
vote
where
eric
wasn't
at
the
meeting.
A
So
I
had,
I
had
hoped
to
today
be-
and
I
had
this
conversation
with
eric-
he
knew
about
it
and
because
I
knew
he
wasn't
going
to
be
at
tonight's
meeting,
but
I
do
want
don
and
bonnie
here
and
I'll
share
the
email
with
you
that
the
town
attorney
sent
so
that
you
can
all
see
it,
and
I
think
that
that
was
the
only
piece
of
old
business.
Peter.
Did
I
miss
anything.
Can
I
ask
a
question?
Yes,.
C
A
So
they
he
was
just
I,
I
think,
because
he
had
properties
across
the
street,
that
it
was
considered
a
conflict
of
interest,
or
at
least
the
town
attorney
believed
that
it
could
potentially
be
a
conflict
of
interest
so
to
remove
any
possible
conflict
to
just
take
a
vote
when
eric
wasn't
present.
Okay,.