►
From YouTube: Hummingbot Weekly Developer Call 006 | 24 August 2022
Description
The Hummingbot Weekly Developer Call is a technical and general discussion intended to gather active community developers who contribute to making the Hummingbot codebase better through Hummingbot Improvement Proposals (HIPs) and Bug Fixes.
Meeting Info:
- Schedule: August 24, 2022 : 10:00 AM EST / 2:00 PM UTC / 10:00 PM HKT
- Duration: 60 minutes
- Location: Hummingbot Discord https://discord.gg/hummingbot, in the community-call-chat at https://discord.com/channels/530578568154054663/996769563054186536
Agenda:
- Continue discussion on Indicators PRD
- Next Steps: Exchange Certification Program
- [HIP] Bot Orchestration
- Epoch 2: Review DAO Funding
- Community Q&A
#hummingbot #developer #algotrading #cryptotrading #liquiditymining #marketmaker #trading #bottrade
A
A
A
Welcome
to
this
community
call
the
channel
for
today
ask
a
little
based
on
the
musical
chat,
we're
going
to
start
with
the
discussion
on
the
indicators.
Prd
then
we're
going
to
review
the
exchange
certification
program,
the
box
processes
and
the
bounties
board,
then
the
hip
of
the
bot
orchestration
and,
lastly,
they
reviewed
our
funding
for
the
epoch
2.
There
is
a
thread
in
this
course
that
might
post
and
some
q
a
from
the
community.
A
A
A
One
of
the
things
that
we
realized
is
probably
the
best
solution
for
creating
this
ohlc
will
be
creating
a
new
component
in
hummingbos
like,
for
example,
a
new
service
that
will
be
in
charge
of
creating
this
ohlc
object,
and
then
this
osoc
will
have
their
indicators
there
and
can
communicate
to
all
the
bots
the
signals
that
we
want.
So
that
was
another
proposal
created
by
founders
on
a
meeting
with
coin
alpha
2.
So
I
would
like
to
know
what
you
think
about
this.
A
If
you
want
to
have
it
in
in
the
source
code,
if
you
want
to
have
it
like
in
the
standard
component,
the
good
thing
of
having
this
in
a
in
a
different
service
will
be.
That
will
be
much
more
easy
to
improve,
to
make
changes
without
introducing
that
directly
into
the
source
code,
and
the
complexity
will
be
will
be
much
more.
A
A
A
B
B
Then
you
have
a
bot
that
you
can
have
like
a
strategy
that
is
like
basically
creating
like
an
indicator,
basically
and-
and
I
think,
using
the
orchestration
framework
that
that
we're
designing
you
could
kind
of
like
basically
create
one
bot,
that's
creating
indicators
and
another
bot,
that's
consuming
those
indicators
and
those
those
that
that
flow
is
being
intermediated
by
some
type
of
like
broker
or
mechanism.
So
so
I
think
that,
yes
to
me,
I
feel
like
it's.
You
know
because
it'll
be
yeah.
B
A
Yeah,
I
totally
agree
would
be
a
very
a
very
good
advantage
to
start
having
this
kind
of
services
that
won't
it
does,
because,
if
not
all
the
responsibility
will
be
inside
of
the
bot
in
this
case,
having
this
micro
service
that
creates
the
autoc.
I
only
pass
the
messages
using
the
system
of
kilopanagi.
A
It
will
be
a
very
good
solution
to
start
scaling,
hummingbot
and
probably
if
you
have,
for
example,
50
instances
of
the
bot
you
just
have
you
shall
you
will
only
have
one
oh
hlc
araka
wants
to
to
showing.
If
you
want
khalid
to
accept
him
having
just
one
d,
one
microservice
will
be
the
one
that
process
all
the
information
of
the
ohlc's,
creates
all
the
indicators
and
then
that
information
will
be
forwarded
to
all
the
instances.
So
for
me,
it's
a
very
good
design
to
have
this
as
a
micro
service.
C
C
A
Yes,
excellent
well,
the
the
solution
that
I
was
thinking
about
is
not
using
the
websocket
channel
of
the
ohc,
because
I
would
like
to
construct
a
more
advanced
system
that
lets.
You
not
only
have
time
based
bars,
but
you
can
have
volume
based
bars
that
are
more
useful
if
you
want
to
make
like,
for
example,
machine
learning
and
the
way
of
constructing
these
ohocs
is
using
the
trade.
A
So
if
you
are
using
the
trade,
you
can
construct
any
hlc
in
any
time
frame
that
you
want.
So
you
only
need
the
trace
channel.
You
need
the
to
stream,
the
web
socket
of
the
trace
channel
and
to
construct
the
original
c,
the
historical
ochlc.
You
will
need
to
collect
the
trades
before
and
then
build
your
ohc.
So
the
component
has
to
be
able
to
collect
historical
information,
create
the
ohc
start
streaming,
the
trades
and
building
the
newer
oslc,
so
that.
C
Yeah,
that's
one
of
my
questions.
I
was
taking
the
last
meeting
and
your
presentation
about
how
to
work
with
a
bars
with
some
tail
from
straight
I'm
not
to
use
the
the
oe
shield
and
my
my
question
is:
if
you
have
a
comparison
strategy
about
how
it,
how
is
the
the
gain
compared
to
the
your
proposal,
using
some
trade
or
from
the
the
normal
oehlc.
A
Yes,
for
that,
there
is
a
book
that
I
have.
I
can
show
you
the
link,
the
advances
in
financial
machine
learning
there
is.
There
is
a
lot
of
studies
about
this,
because
what
they
are
looking
at
is
the
distribution
of
the
returns.
So
if
you
check
the
distribution
of
the
returns
of
a
volume
base
or
dollar
base
bars
instead
of
using
time-based
bars,
you
will
check
that
the
decision
has
a
much
more
it's
a
much
more
normal
distribution.
A
So
that's
why
these
kind
of
this
kind
of
bars
are
very,
very
powerful
because
it
lets
you
detect
anomalies
in
the
market
instead
of
a
be
based
on
only
on
time.
Obviously,
this
feature
will
let
you
create
time,
volume
and
dollar.
It
will
let
you
create
all
the
kind
of
bars
that
you
want,
so
I'm
using
just
the
trades,
because
the
way
of
constructing
them
is
streaming
the
trades
and
put
like
an
a
a
loop
that
will
be
a
for
example.
If
it's
time
based,
it
will
check
the
time
stamp
when
the
time
sum
meets.
A
For
example,
five
minutes
is
your
candlestick.
It
will
take
the
first
trade,
the
low
the
high
and
the
close
trade
of
that
candle
and
close
that
candle
every
five
minutes.
If
it's
volume
it
will
do
the
same,
but
instead
of
doing
every
five
minutes,
it
will
do
it
at
every
100,
bitcoins
traded,
for
example,
if
your
your
candle
is
100
bitcoins,
so
you
just
have
to
use
the
same
source
of
information
that
will
be
the
trade
and
you
can
construct
all
the
the
the
trait
that
you
want.
A
The
thing
is,
you
have
much
more
better
results
in
terms
of
doing
like
machine
learning
models
or
prediction
about
the
market
by
using
a
volume
instead
of
time,
and
one
thing
is
like
the
price,
if
you,
if,
if
I
move
the
price
and
it's
without
volume,
it's
like
a
probably
a
fake
move
of
the
price,
that's
one
of
the
one
of
the
of
the
things.
If
I
make,
if
I
move
a
lot,
the
volume
the
price
without
volume
seems
like
I'm,
manipulating
a
lot
of
the
market.
A
A
A
A
A
Yeah
kalito,
the
indicators
is
a
another
feature
that
will
be
that
is
provided
by
the
like
a
like
an
integration
in
the
their
solution,
but
probably
it's
better
to
if
you
are
going
to
make
some
logic
with
that
indicator.
You
have
this
component
and
code
that
is
code
directly
in
python,
so
you
can
code
in
python
directly,
whatever
you
want
and
you
don't
need
to
rely
on
on
trading
view.
B
A
I
think
the
the
experience
in
hummingbird
is
not
needed
here,
because
it
will
be
like
an
a
different
service.
So
that's
one
of
the
advantages
of
creating
these
kind
of
separate
services
and
then
feed
the
information
via
mqtt,
but
they
will.
It
will
be
good
that
they
don't
know
how
to
code
async
functions
because
all
the
code,
this
code
has
to
be
acing
to
be
because
probably
you
are
going
to
subscribe
to
different
websockets.
A
A
D
D
Do
I
need
to
worry
about
web
sockets
because,
like
I
guess,
also
kind
of
like
I'll
answer,
the
question
is
like
my
backgrounds
of
like
javascript
web
development.
Less
than
python,
like,
I
would
almost
say
like
I'm,
you
know
very
inexperienced
in
python,
so
I'm
like,
I
think
maybe
I
can
figure
it
out,
but
that's
kind
of
where
I'm
coming
from.
So
I
guess
just
like
it's
a
good
question
like
how
long
would
you
think
it
would
take.
A
So
I
think
that
you
can
you
can
you
can
learn
it
in
python?
Very
good.
But
I
don't
know
if
you,
if
we
have
to
use
an
another
external
service
to
to
query
the
trade
from
the
the
blockchain
directly
in
python.
It
would
be
that
better
to
do
in
javascript.
That's
one
of
the
things
that
I
already
know
which
what
will
be
better
for
that,
but
also
we
can
start
just
including
some
centralized
exchanges.
A
Probably
we
can
just
start,
including
the
certified
con,
the
exchanges,
because
we
will
need
to
stream
the
website
the
channels
of
all
the
centralized
exchanges
and
then
construct
the
autosys.
But
then
we
can
start
increasing
the
quantity
of
exchanges
or
decentralized
exchanges
that
we
are
supporting
in
these
components.
D
A
A
B
A
B
B
We
recently
announced
it
last
week
intended
to
work
with
these
nine
exchanges
to
make
sure
that
their
connectors
are
working
properly,
so
we'll
be
creating
bounties
for
bugs
related
the
surprise
exchanges
and
which
will
then
allow
opportunity
to
earn
bounties
for
doing
that
and,
in
addition,
we're
launching
a
new
version
of
the
website,
we're
gonna,
we'll
be
taking
over
the
existing
dot
io
website
from
from
from
coin
alpha
and
the
main
website
for
foundation.
So
it
won't
be.
B
Landing
pages
for
each
exchange
that
they
tell
people,
you
know
how
like
how
they
can.
Actually,
you
know,
like
you,
think
about
it
on
that
exchange,
what
the
benefits
are
for,
creating
them
and
as
well
as
for
the
foundation
and
then
finally,
we'll
be
working
with
each
of
the
exchange
partners
to
try
to
solve
special
promotions,
for
instance,
trading
competitions,
special,
like
c
rebates
that
are
for
the
humble
community
and
we'll
have
to
find
a
place
in
that
possibly
a
site
or
in
discord.
B
However,
because
of
the
way
that
you
know
our
business
model
work,
which
is
that
we
have
feature
partnerships
with
the
larger
top
exchanges,
it
benefits-
you
know
to
kind
of
like
get
more
volume
on
these
larger
exchanges,
because
that
gives
us
more
force
to
you
know,
create
bounties.
You
know
push
forward
on
things
like
indicators
and
instead
and
basically
be
able
to
develop
more
resources
to
improving
hong
kong.
B
B
D
B
So
the
idea
is
that
any
developer
can
be
in
order
to
you
know
kind
of
like
basically
have
their
basically
just
to
say
that
they
want
to.
They
want
to
basically
address
this
in
in
it.
So
so,
basically
right
now,
I
think
there's
about
eight
to
ten
bucks
on
the
bounties
board.
So
that
means
that
anyone
can
go
and
basically
add
a
comment
saying
that
they
would
like
to
fix
the
bug
afterwards.
B
So
responses
still
kind
of
being
worked
on,
so
we're
still
kind
of
we're,
still
kind
of
working
on
writing
down
the
the
process
used
to
assess
bugs
you
know,
you
know,
assign
them
to
different
categories
assignments,
to
different
developers
and
and
so
forth.
But
it's
something
that
we
like
to
involve
this
community
and
as
much
as
possible
down
the
line
because
we're
just
starting
currently,
you
know
the
foundation
is
one:
that's
like
taking
ownership
over
it
of
developers
as
long
as
the
verb.
A
B
B
B
However,
you
know
on
ongoing
basis,
if
we're
responsible
for
making
sure
every
single
thing
in
the
code
base
is
working
properly,
then
that
dilutes
the
level
of
focus
that
we
can
provide
for
the
top
ones,
and-
and
I
think
that,
based
on
how
people
are
using
coming
by
the
the
larger
exchanges
are
being
used
more
than
the
smaller
ones.
So
I
think
it
also
kind
of
helps
us
provide
a
level
better
level
service
to
the
majority
of
users,
but.
A
Perfect
and
regarding
to
the
about
process
on
the
advantage
board,
we
like
to
to
explain
like
okay,
suppose
that
I
found
the
bug
how
how
would
be
the
process
or
how,
where
I
have
to
check.
If
I
have
a
I,
I
would
like
to
know
which
are
the
bugs
that
are
available
to
solve
with
a
page
who,
who
is
the
person
that
I
should
contact?
B
Yeah
yeah
thanks
for
the
prom
yeah,
so
the
the
bug
backing
process
is
really
designed
for
the
foundation
to
assess
but
put
them
on
the
board
and
then
and
then
anyone
can
tell
developers
can
then
fix
them.
So
the
the
bug
reporting
process
is
still
the
same
as
before,
and
anyone
can
submit
a
bug
report
and
create
an
open
issue
on
github.
A
This
bounty
board
so
for
all
the
community
that
wants
to
solve
and
contribute
with
the
source
code
can
start
with
those
bugs
and
those
bad
probably
will
have
a
bounty
associated
and
also
there
is
a
another
way
that
another,
an
external
person
can
fund
the
solution
of
a
bug
and
also
that
will
be
posted
in
the
box.
A
board
too
so
well.
A
That's
that's
the
process
we
are
trying
to
start
working
on.
It
start
get
this
process
very
better,
so
yeah
there
is
a
question
that
is
from
new
way
is:
is
there
a
section
in
channels
for
bounties
or
bugs?
No,
we
don't
have
the
section.
But
what
do
you
think?
Because,
right
now,
the
way
of
checking
which
are
the
bugs
is
entering
github
in
the
project,
and
I
will
paste
probably
arnold
calito.
If
you
can
paste
the
link
of
the
projects
of
github.
A
A
How
do
you
think
community
that
will
be
better
in
order
to
have
more
clarity
of
who
is
working
on
which
issue
right
now
they
have
to
contact
a
which
will
be
the
person,
the
the
point
person
to
contact
the
for
for
this
mic.
If
suppose
that
I
am
a
community
dev
and
I
want
to
solve
the
issue
number
10,
which
is
the
person
that
I
should
contact-
that's
one
of
the
questions.
Probably
you
can
answer
in
the
in
the
chat.
I
don't
know
if
it's
kalito
or.
A
I
I
think
that
you're
showing
again
the
chat.
The
question
is
suppose
that
I
I
am
checking
the
bounty
boards,
which
is
the
person
that
I
should
contact
to
to
do
it,
or
or
probably
the
suggestion
of
new
way
is
good
just
to
have
channels
bounties
bus
in
discord
and
the
people
can
stay
there.
Hey.
I
want
to
work
in
this
vlog.
B
A
A
A
I
will
paste
this
in
okay
I'll
recall
it
already
well,
this
is
the
the
current
hi,
the
current
forum
thread
of
the
voter
orchestration
of
the
phases
that
we
talked
on
the
last
meeting.
So
the
next
step
will
be
the
kia
panagi
fills
the
his
section
and
presents
the
hip
to
start
working
on
it.
So
hopefully
we
have
to
vote
on
it,
and
hopefully
this
week,
that
hip
will
be
ready.
A
A
A
There
is
also
a
thread
I
don't
know
calito
if
you
can
post
the
thread
in
the
chat
too
about
how
we're
going
to
review
the
aprs
in
the
foundation,
because
the
last
epoch
we
have
like
a
tech
review
down
that
was
there
were
five
persons.
I
think
that
were
in
charge
of
reviewing
the
aprs
currently
in
the
foundation.
We
think
that
that
person
has
to
be
selected
by
by
us,
for
example,
in
my
opinion,
that's
why
I
commented
in
the
forum
thread.
A
So
that's
why
I
think
that
letting
that
the
review
for
any
community
member
is
not
a
good
decision
and
the
second
one
is
also
that,
if
suppose
that
I
I
propose
a
change
for
a
bounty.
For
example,
I
don't
know
one
million
eight
votes
and
I
provide
a
solution
that
is
not
working
as
intended,
but
I
want
to
merge
it
to
get
the
bounty.
I
also
can
ask
a
friend
to
hey
repeat:
spl
like
it's
working
and
it
will
be
versed.
So
that's
one,
that's
where
those
are
two
reasons.
A
I
think
that
this
person,
or
this
a
reviewer
has
to
be
part
of
an
organization
like,
for
example,
the
tech
review,
though,
that
we
have
the
last
epoch,
but
we
have
to
change
the
way
that
we
are
managing
that
segregat,
probably
we
will
have
to
assign
like
in
the
foundation
hey
you
have
to
review
this
one.
You
have
to
review
this
pr
and
the
rewards
has
to
be
based
on
the
the
code
review
of
the
quantity
of
review
that
makes
any
each
of
the
participants.
A
So
that's
one
of
the
things
that
we
want
to
prevent
in
these
in
this
epoch.
So
right
now
we
don't
have
the
tech
reviews
out.
We
don't
have
any
solution
based
on
that.
The
only
ones
that
can
review
prs
now
are
fausti,
and
I
probably
this
is
not
scalable,
but
for
now
we
are
going
to
focus
only
on
review
but
prs
of
bugs
until
we
have
this
degree
without
this
solution.
A
A
Probably
the
code
quality
is
not
so
necessary
to
merge
that
connector,
so
probably
having
some
rules
to
define
where
how
we
can
merge
a
connector
when
we
can
merge
it,
which
are
the
rules
to
accept
the
the
code
quality
of
that
it
will
be
good
to
have
your
opinion
too.
So
well
that
are
all
the
topics
for
today
now
it's
time
to
q
a
so
if
you
want
to
ask
any
questions,
is
the
time
now
you
can.