►
From YouTube: Aries-vcx Meeting
Description
Aries-vcx Meeting
A
B
B
A
B
So
well
this
this
has
been
here
kind
of
permanently
put
as
a
reminder:
I
still
haven't
managed
to
stop
by
there
and
time
off
on
Monday,
so
I
couldn't,
but
that
was
I
was
yesterday
attending
the
Aries
War
group
call,
and
so,
and
so
two
points
were
well
not
necessarily
touched
on.
I
didn't
get
to
speak
about
the
issue,
credential
stuff,
but
I
think
the
the
guys
are
aware
of
that.
B
B
This
kind
of
stuff
can
also
be
decoupled.
So
also
also
left
the
point
here,
I'm
curious.
What
what
kind
of
discussion
is
gonna
spread
out
of
this
so
yeah
we'll
see.
Perhaps
this
might
be
also
the
better
medium
to
discuss
the
issue
than
raising
it
on
a
call
and
that
on
a
wardrobe
call
and
then
I
have
five
to
ten
minutes
to
discuss
about
it.
B
But
yeah
I
was
asking
on
a
call
for
like
how
long
is
this
gonna
be
open
for
a
modifications?
Is
it
usually
it's
easier
to
find
out
it's
easier
to
find
out
things
you
don't
like
about
rfcs
once
you
actually
start
to
implement
them,
so
I
was
asking
like
how
how
long
can
this
stay
open
for
modifications?
So
we
don't
have
to
create
a
did
peer
version.
Five.
B
If
we
run
into
some
breaking
tweaks,
you
would
like
to
do
and
basically
there's
no
rush.
I
was
told
that
there
is
no
not
necessarily
Rush
with
merging
this,
and
we
are
welcome
to
you
know,
leave
leave
feedback
on
this,
but
yeah
so
I
I
kind
of
like
to
comment
here
that
we'll
be
starting
implementing
this
just
so
that
they
are
aware
of
it
and
hopefully
waiting
for
us
to
provide
some
feedback.
B
B
And
yeah
I
don't
know,
I
saw
that
the
discussion
last
kind
of
community
happening
wise.
So
the
the
issue
you
George
created
a
while
ago
I
know
it
seems
a
little
bit
stale.
The
last
comment
was
two
weeks
ago:
do
you
know
if
there's
I
know
any
any
devote
further
developments
of
this?
So
Andy
was
talking
about
some
releases
here.
Do
you
know
if
anything
came
out.
B
Right,
okay,
well,
we'll
see,
I
haven't
checked
the
repos
if
there's
possibly
any
releases,
so
it
might
be
something
I
would
missed.
I
guess
just
just
want
to
keep
track
of
this,
so
I
think
we
can
keep
it
here
until
these
things
become
resolved,
yeah
and
then
and
then
well
before
I
move
on
to
mentorship
updates,
there's
a
new
and
then
you
do
does
any
of
you
any
any
kind
of
Community
updates
or
attended
any
any
any
calls
to
report
on
by
a
chance.
B
No
I
guess
10
minutes.
No,
so
that's
fine!
Let's
move
on
to
mentorship
updates,
so
we
we
also
have
nine
to
join
the
call
eventually
and
welcome
on
okay.
So
we
can
start
with
a
mediator,
so
it
it
came.
It
happened
to
be
that
usually
coming
coming
report
as
to
to
about
your
status.
So
you
have
any
news
and
progress
updates
for
us
this
week.
C
Okay,
so
last
time
I
think
I
had
demoed
this.
That
is
this
is
the
mediator
displaying
an
out-of-band
in
white,
so
this
is
currently
implemented
for
the
mediator
part.
Then
this
past
week,
I
was
working
on
the
client
side
of
the
mediator
that
is
making
a
connection
using
this
out
of
pen.
Invite
last
time
I.
Think
I
had
also
demoed
the
web
UI
for
making
a
client
request.
C
So
George
mentioned
last
time
about
if
I
had
tried
to
do
a
CLI
and
I
had
mentioned
that
it's
a
bit,
not
very
ergonomic,
so
I
did
think
about
it,
though,
later
again,
when
George
mentioned
and
I
thought,
okay,
a
CLI
is
not
very
ergonomic,
but
a
toi
could
kind
of
be
possible
for
Aries,
so
I
went
ahead
and
experimented
with
this
Library
called
cursive
and
I
have
something
right
now.
So
this,
for
example,
you
can
see
this
is
the
toi
that
I
created
for
the
Aries
mediator
client.
C
So
you
get
a
list
of
endpoints.
Just
like
you'd
have
endpoints
for
the
web
UI.
You
can
have
a
list
of
them
here
and
then
you
can
use
your
mouse
to
select
it
and
you
get
this
nice
display
box
where
you
can
manually
copy
paste.
So,
for
example,
I'm
now
here
copying
the
OB
invite
from
the
web
page
and
pasting
it
here.
C
So
it
works
fine
and
you
can
try
to
connect
so
right
now
it's
showing
a
404,
because
the
mediator
side
of
receiving
the
connection
request
isn't
implemented
yet,
but,
as
you
can
see,
you
can
kind
of
have
a
terminal
UI
for
the
client,
also
yes
and
yeah.
So
right
now,
I'm
working
on
the
mediator
side
of
accepting
the
connection
and
sending
back
a
response
and
I
hope
that
by
maybe
next
week,
I'll
have
the
connection
part
holy
setup.
B
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
That's
very
cool.
Looking
forward
to
see
you
know
making
connections
through
this.
This
you,
this
UI
and
like
fetching
checking
for
the
messages,
can
be
actually
really
really
cool
demo
to
show
the
ones
we
have
ones
like
the
whole
did
come.
Kind
of
interface
is
integrated
here
and
I
would
be
able
to
click
on
buttons,
like
fetch
messages
and
see
all
the
messages
and
from
whom
they've
been
sent.
C
B
It's
gonna
be
really
cool
for,
like
demo
purposes
and
yeah
actually
actually
like
I
would
like
to,
and
this
applies
for
the
both
projects
both
for
the
mediator
and
the
UEFI
wrapper
it'll,
be
I,
think
nice
to
make
a
small
demo,
and
some
of
the
Aries
or
group
calls
just
to
show
what
we
are
up
to
and
what
are
the
outputs
of
the
the
mentorship
which
we
are
running
and
I
think
this
will
be
like
really
beautiful
demo
for
the
for
that
purpose.
To
actually
show
them
like.
B
B
B
B
A
Yeah
yeah
I
am
I,
I'll
suggest
something
new
and
then
it'll
end
up
in
another
PR.
So
maybe
it's
my
fault
for
not
waiting
until
the
first
one's
done
before
recommending
other
things.
But
it's
it's
going
well
the
project,
the
connection
implementation
is
done.
I
think
swapnils
addressed
my
final
comment
now,
but
then
we
were
earlier
this
week
we
were
having
a
look
at
how
we
can
refactor
the
app
a
little
bit
to
make
it
more
readable
and
understandable
to
people
who
look
at
it.
A
A
Then
we
did
some
script
optimizations
as
well,
so
yeah
it
should
be
easier
for
you
know
someone
like
you
or
just
a
random
Android
developer,
to
try
spin
up
the
project
themselves
with
the
simplest
script
yeah
and
in
the
meantime,
swapno's
been
looking
at
the
issue.
Credential
V1
protocol
and
that's
the
next
task.
B
C
D
B
Much
space
of
a
single
Aries
for
a
group
call,
but
do
you
think
they're
that
the
that
the
app
is
like
nearing
a
stage
where
there
will
be
something
demoable,
I
guess
maybe
the
the
connections
working
and
the
and
issue
issuance
protocol
and
being
implemented?
I
guess
that's
something
that
will
be.
You
know
the
the
mobile.
A
B
B
B
We
should
also
make
sure
to
have
a
some
nice
nice
readings
about
it,
but
we
still
have
what
month
and
a
half
till
the
end
of
mentorship.
Is
that
right?
Something
like
that.
So
yeah
should
be
enough
time,
all
right
so
going
through
our
usual
Parts
overview.
So
it's
not
much
to
start
this
week.
I
think
we
had
the
lint
fixes
it's
yet
to
be
merged,
but
I
consider
it
as
to
be
done.
The
CI
looks
like
it's
gonna
pass
my
approval
on
it.
B
B
B
D
Assume
in
particular
to
George
if
he
wants
to
have
another
look
over
it
or
yeah.
The
description
pretty
much
said
that
the
like
bigger
crates
like
rsbcx
series,
CX,
core
and
Libby
CX,
are
gonna
be
handled
in
separate
PRS,
which
they
were,
but
the
PRS
were
based
on
this
one
and
I
saw
that
you
merged
the
vcx
core
one,
so
I
merged
the
other
one
too.
So
they're
now
part
of
this,
which
makes
it
bigger
I
guess,
but
just
just
as
an
FYI.
D
B
Yeah
yeah
apologies
I,
actually
didn't
notice
that
it
was
based
on
this
one.
So
it's
it's
my
mistake,
I
I
would
I
would
generally
also
like
actually
prefer
that
approaches
while
having
them
merge
separately.
So
if,
if
you
are
fine
with
that,
we
could
perhaps
you
could
horse
push
into
this
PR
the
original
pre-emerge
version,
and
then
we
create
those
PR.
So
we
can
merge
them
into
main
or.
B
D
D
So
I
guess
that's
fine,
and
this
one
will
basically
incorporate
this.
So
I'll
do
live
vcx
in
a
separate
one
and
one
more.
It's
gonna
still
gonna
be
based
on
this,
but
we're
gonna
merge
them
into
main
separately
I
I
guess
the
levy
CX
is
the
most
Troublesome
one
anyway,
when
it
comes
down
to
lens.
So.
B
Yeah
I
I,
I
I,
don't
know
what
was
the
discussion
between
you,
bogana
and
George.
It
seems
like
you
had
some
communication
about
this,
which
I
kind
of
didn't
realize.
George
are
you?
Are
you
fine
with,
despite
what
happened
and
that
we
actually
got
it
merged
you
find
with
going
forward
and
merging
this
yeah.
A
B
A
B
B
B
I
was
actually
working
on
this
further
after
I
got
the
reviews
from
you
guys.
I
have
an
address
everything.
There
are
still
comments
from
George
I
need
to
address,
but
I
did
address
kind
of
bigger
impact.
Higher
impact
request
from
from
Bogdan,
so
I
have
removed
actually
the
HTTP
messaging
from
here.
B
But
let
me
let
me
know
what
you
guys
think:
I'll
I'll
ping,
you
on
studies
ready
so
I'll
just
move
on
for
now
in
progress,
yeah
still
kind
of
preparing
for
the
vdr
tools
and
on
credit
removal
and
obviously
from
George
side,
a
V2,
slash,
presentation,
protocols,
drafting
I,
don't
think
we
have
planned
anything
new
right
now
other
than
what
we're
already
doing,
and
that
brings
us
to
the
end
of
the
discussion
and
any
other
ones.
You
guys
have
to
bring
up.
A
A
C
B
B
C
It's
a
very
opaque
long
Vector
like
we
don't
know
what
things
it
contains.
I
did,
in
fact
like
take
a
look
like
going
down
the
rabbit
hole
by
I
mean
by
seeing
the
implementation
of
Indie
wallet
and
then
from
there
going
into
ariesvcx
core
signing
dot,
RS
and
then
deeper
and
deeper
and
I
ended
up
at
vdr
tools
where
the
actual
structure
is
defined.
The
unpack
message
so
like
since
video
tools
is
I,
guess
a
optional
dependency.
A
D
D
A
B
B
C
B
So
yeah
thank
you
now
and
I
will
we'll
get
that
addressed
or
if
you
would
like
to
you,
can
actually
take
that
issue
and
try
to
try
to
address
it
yourself
and
quick
review
or
PR,
but
you
should.
You
should
primarily
focus
on
the
on
the
connections.
But
if
you
like
to
take
this
as
a
side
quest
so
to
speak,
then
you
are
free
to
do
so.
C
Yeah
sure
I
mean
I.
I
was
doing
this
anyway,
like
this
morning,
I
was
kind
of
digging
down
this
hole,
trying
to
understand
what
it
is
so
now
that
I
have
I
think
I
can
make
a
PR
changing
the
structure,
so
one
question
I
would
have
if
I
do.
This
is,
should
I
return,
a
different
structure
in
the
base,
wallet,
trade
or
should
I
just
add
the
documentation
regarding
what
the
structure
looks
like
of
the
vector.
B
Now,
it's
probably
lean
towards
just
returning
the
some
some
sort
of
struct
because
yeah
we
always
whenever
we
unpack
message.
We
want
to
actually
work
with
the
data
and
and
usually
we
don't
work
it
with
work
with
it.
I
don't
I,
don't
think
there
is
a
case
where
we
work
within
in
in
such
an
op-back
way.
B
Typically,
when
we
unpack
it,
we
want
to
inspect
what
the
actual
message
is
and
what
what
the
send,
what
the
sender
work
is
stuff
like
that,
so
because
in
some
some
space
some
I
can
imagine
that
there
would
be
scenarios
where
you
actually
want
to
get
just
a
raw
kind
of
data
as
a
UA,
Vector
UA,
then
then
just
pass
it
somewhere
else,
but
I
don't
think
we
have
such
a
case
now
and
it
is
more
confusing
than
it
has
to
be.
So
you
can
create
news
track.
I!
B
C
B
A
B
A
They
do
draw
attention
to
the
fact
that
it's
an
array,
so
you
can
sort
of
see
the
quote
there
and
I'm
having
a
hard
time
understanding
what
they're
trying
to
say
with
this
here
I
think
they're,
trying
to
say
that
you
can
attach
you
know
five
different
presentation
requests
in
different
formats
and
then
the
holder
or
the
proof
is
only
meant
to
reply
to
one
of
them
that
they
can
reply
to.
But
I
don't
know.
If
that's
that's
what
they're
trying
to
say.
B
In
addition
is
that
this
correct
place
I'm
reading
here-
oh
yeah,
the
in
addition,
the
egg
and
problem
informations-
are
about
that
yeah
yeah
are
the
messages
that
include
ethics,
attachments
may
use
any
form
of
embedded
attachment
in
the
examples
below
the
forms
of
attachments
are
arbitrary.
The
attach
array
is
to
be
used
to
enable
single
presentation
to
be
the
requested
delivered
in
in
different
verifiable
presentation
formats.
D
D
Right
and
I
I
guess
it's
fairly
straightforward,
which
would
make
more
sense.
I
would
make
it
less
stupid,
honestly
that,
okay,
they
allow
you
to
have
an
array
of
whatever
attachments,
because
you
can
have
an
array
of
formats
and
it
essentially
allows
you
to
send
the
send
the
same
message:
the
same
attachment
but
encoded
in
different
formats,
so
that
the
counterpart
you
can
choose
whichever
they
want.
D
B
B
A
B
B
Let's,
let's
I,
guess
I'm,
just
looking
at
the
list
of
to-do's
here
I
know:
I
crossed
the
Olympics
since
we
are
getting
addressed
now
next
next
week,
I'll
delete
it
just
look
at
this
report.
Reorg
Point
here
wondering:
if
shall
we?
If
we
shall
start
doing
some
sort
of
you
know,
murdered
not
necessarily
merge
these
projects
but
create
some
sub
some
root
directories
and
and
score
a
bunch
of
crates
in
there,
for
example,
the
did
come
like
did
and
did
resolver
related
stuff
I.