►
From YouTube: Besu Contributor Call
Description
Besu Contributor Call
A
A
A
A
A
F
D
F
A
A
A
A
D
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
B
A
Gary
schulte:
basic
contributors
and
maintainers
will
reply
like
reply
to
a
message
and
have
a
a,
a
main
channel
conversation..
If
we
were
to
make
better
use
of
threads
when
we're
trying
to
reply
reply
to
user
issues,,
we
could
tag
it
cause.
You
get
an
opportunity
to
to
label
the
thread
that
you
create,.
You
could
say
it's
prefix
it
with
private,
and
then
the
topic,
and
then
have
the
thread
there,
or
main
net,,
and
have
the
topic
there..
It
might
be
a
way
of
segregating
the
traffic
without
having
to
create
different
channels.
B
F
F
F
F
F
F
A
A
F
F
F
F
B
B
B
B
D
A
A
A
F
F
Matthew
whitehead:,
it's
sort
of
a
conversation
that
that
matt
and
I've
had
on
on
and
off
for
the
for
the
last
few
weeks.,
and
he
suggested
that
some
point
it
would
be
good.
given
that,,
as
you
can
probably
see
in
the
dog
that
he
and
I've
sort
of
put
some
comments,
in,
and
he's
chips
and
comments
in
that.
Maybe
we're
getting
to
the
point
where
the
wider
community
would
have
some
views
on
it.
F
F
F
F
Matthew
whitehead:,
so
we
matthew
whitehead:,
are
matthew,
whitehead:,
sort
of
bridging
between
an
open
source
product
and
customers
who
want
commercial
support
and
stability
and
and
the
kind
of
things
that
they
want.
and
matt
was
very
open
to
us,
working
together
to
see
if
any
of
the
any
of
the
sort
of
the
challenges
are
doing,
that
any
of
the
pain
points
with
things
that
that
we
could
sort
of
collaborate
on
and
over
time,,
maybe
improve..
So
yeah,
coming
back
to
one
of
the
one
of
the
first
possible
outcomes
of
this..
F
F
F
F
F
F
Matthew
whitehead:
at
matthew,
whitehead:
yeah.,
the
last
time
I
and
I
spoke
about
it,.
I
think
we
both
sort
of
thought
it
was
worth
just
partly
highlighting
to
the
community
a
bit
more
broadly.,
seeing
if
others
have
things
they
want
to
contribute
to
this
in
terms
of
other
areas,
they
think
could
be
improved,
highlighting
errors
that
I've
been
here.,
so
ii
basically
wrote
this,
and
with
with
a
view
to.
F
F
F
F
A
Matthew
whitehead::
are
you
and
matt
good
to
continue
forward
with
next
steps
on
this?,
or
is
that
something
that
you
want
to
try
to
define
on
the
contributor
call
or
yeah,,
I
think,
probably
said.?
What
I'll
I'll
probably
do
is
I'll
I'll,
just
ping
matt
and
mentioned
that.
yeah,.
I
just
raised
it
for
awareness
on
on
the
call,
because
like,
I
say,
he
and
I
both
thought.
That
was
probably
a
good
next
step.
F
F
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
F
F
A
A
Gary
schulte:,
you
know.
gary
schulte:,
rewriting
as
as
necessary
to
get
what
currently
is
in
main
onto
the
release,
branch.
and
ideally,.
When
we
haven't
had
cherry
pick
releases
or
or
things
that
we've
had
to
deal
with.,
it's
just
a
matter
of
cutting
a
pr
that
is
merge
main
into
this
release.
Branch,
and
the
the
prior
release
branch
was
cut
from
main,,
so
it
should
be
a
fairly
clean
merge
into
it.
So
it
should
be.