►
From YouTube: IETF92-CLUE-20150323-0900
Description
CLUE meeting session at IETF92
2015/03/23 0900
A
B
A
A
A
Any
comment
home
on
the
agenda
for
today's
agenda.
Now
we
haven't
time
slowed
from
thursday
and
hopefully
I
think
that
we
will
not
need
it,
which
means
that
we
will
also
try
today
to
discuss
after
we
finish
the
presentation:
how
to
progress
the
world
in
order
drove
the
plan
in
order
to
finish
the
work
in
the
world
view.
A
A
So
the
framework
is
went
to
finish.
Their
working
group
last
call
I
finally
finished
the
working
group
last
call
and
it
is
now
ready
for
publication.
So
after
the
meeting,
my
intention
is
to
do
the
write
up
and
272
IHG
for
publication.
There
are
no
known
issues,
I
hope,
because
anyone
have
something
to
say
about
it.
Any
last-minute
comments
before
we
close
this
document,
then
he
done
lose.
It.
A
B
A
A
You
have
to
elect
to
allow
for
a
lot
of
space
at
the
journal,
employer,
okay,
the
the
new
protocol
data
channel,
this
version
buell.
I
also
finished
the
word
he
would
last
call
and
all
the
issues
were
addressed.
There
are
no
long
issues.
The
only
thing
that
that's
keeping
us
now
is
that
it
has
normative
reference
to
five
known
RFC
governments
from
other
working
group,
including
draft.
A
Changes
in
the
document,
at
least
this
document,
the
federal
ethnically
negotiation
was
there
was
a
decision
we
took
in
the
previous
meeting
to
use
this
method
and
we
are
very
dependent
on
it,
because
otherwise
we
have
to
go
to
other
mechanism
to
openly
the
data
channel
for
the
for
the
glue
glue.
Yes,
sir,
okay,
let's
get
sick.
B
A
This
is
a
good
time
to
think
people
they
good
with
people
from
this
working
with
we
look
at
you
can
see
that
it's
in
line
with
what
we
design
it's
mostly
first
of
all,
it's
Christy,
of
course,
but
there,
of
course,
all
of
them.
Yeah,
that's
okay,
but
I
mean
at
least
that
we
know
that
it's
in
line
with
work
is
in
the
document
or
we
don't
have
any
issues
with
the
proper
will
be
using
in
our
protocol.
A
B
B
Richard
Barnes,
so
yeah
I
have
this
is
one
of
the
groups
were
jealous,
has
been
responsible
side
repellent,
plus,
if
it
generally,
this
plan
that
you're
talking
about
holding
the
channel
the
data
channel
document
until
its
references
nutritive,
pretty
sensible,
especially
giving
it
this
server
playing
predictable,
it's
good
to
avoid
late
surprises
and
any
compact
images
after
I
etfs
Colin,
probably
require
a
real,
so
yeah.
This.
B
A
B
A
A
C
A
C
A
Think
that
I
think
the
major
concern
that
the
major
concern
is
this:
it's
a
music
document.
The
other
documents
are
also
required
for
the
RTC
web
they're
all
this
definition
of
the
howdy,
how
you
define
the
SDP,
the
SDP
for
the
but
the
data
channel.
So
so
that's
so
that's
not
I.
Don't
think
that
they
would
they're
stopping
us
now,
the
major
one
that
we
would
like
to
see
bed
because
get
better
feeling
about
that.
It's
mature!
Is
this
one?
That's
why
I
put
that
through
this
one's
leg,
the
recipe
negotiation
is
the
one.
A
A
And
that's
what
we'll
see
that
in
a
music
and
I
think
that's
what
the
point
that
kiss
was
making
about
blue
chairs
no
I'm,
saying
I'm,
saying
that
I
was
saying
that
that's
the
point
that
kiss
was
saying
that
it's
probably
he
will
think
that
it's
mature
enough
and
it's
it
will
go
to.
He
will
ask
for
a
music
to
study
group
last
work
pretty
soon
and
the
moment,
it's
probably
when
you
finish
work
last
fall.
We
can
say.
A
C
A
We
will
look
at
starting
working
group
last
call
or
anywhere
in
the
class
for
based
on
maturity
of
the
document
housing.
After
this
meeting,
we
filled
that
how
people
feel
about
all
those
other
words
you
document,
and
we
will
ask
for
volunteers
from
each
document
to
review
each
of
the
documents
we
do
it
in
the
path
of
the
presentation
of
document.
I
would
encourage
people
to
volunteer
to
to
review
and
will
take
names
for
their
next.
A
A
A
New
protocol,
the
response
is
based
on
the
day
that
the
document
had
some
points
that
they
are
interested
in
and
I
try
to
respond
to
all
those
points,
and
the
first
part
was
an
immediate
products.
What
is
doing
about
it
so
clue
doesn't
recommend
any
specific
order.
The
topic
is
out
of
scope
of
the
blue
working
group
at
the
IPF.
We
obviously
what
would
recommend
your
postcode
it
for
speech
and
I
give
reference.
A
Okay,
so
you
n
both
say
to
go
to
64
in
vp8
for
video
and
I,
either
the
reference
for
that
one
media
configuration
including
session
setup
and
control
procedure
for
ims,
based
telepresence,
a
mega
provision
aspects
of
capability
negotiation
based
on
SD
p.m.
new
protocol.
That
was
the
interest,
and
this
is
a
made
from
the
crew
perspective.
This
is
a
major
focus
of
the
glue
working
group
aspect
specified
in
the
clue
one
hook
charter,
the
following
document
defined
these
topics
are
the
framework.
A
The
the
signaling
the
protocol
and
the
data
model
schema
is
a
short
explanation
and
setup
and
control
of
individual
media
stream
between
clients,
including
interactivity,
such
as
it
ending
a
dropping
of
media
component
as
well
as
Emperor
and
cures
QRS
and
early
for
I
myspace
telepresence
again.
This
is
not
this.
This
is
not
in
the
scope
of
the
clue
working
group,
the
support
for
setup
and
control
arm.
Individual
swim
is
based
on
the
tools
available
as
specified
by
otherwise
you
look
like
a
PT
kereta
TX
payload
in
their
music.
A
So
we
are
not
doing
this
specifically
here.
Data
transport,
including
usage
of
our
ppar
tcp
protocol
RTP
profile
payload
formats,
are
the
key
mapping,
media
civilization
and
so
on.
So
this
topic
is
discussing
the
crew
signaling
document
and
some
aspect
of
mapping
RTP
stream.
The
clue
media
captures
are
discussed
in
the
article
mapping
requirement
and
guideline
for
media
dictation.
Diagnostics
telepresence,
for
example,
is
for
such
changes
of
network
memories.
This
is
LA.
If
you
were
to
group,
the
general
solution
for
congestion.
B
A
A
C
C
A
Isn't,
okay,
so
just
to
clarify
the
reason
I
happy
these?
All
these
bullet
points
are
coming
from
the
essay
for
document
that
was
attached
to
be
to
the
liaison,
which
stated:
what
is
their
interest
me?
Okay,
so
that
was
the
question
I
I
try
to
respond
to
so
the
first
part
of
it
is
what
is
the?
What
is
clue
about
so
I
can
say
clue
is
that
just
leave
the
first,
the
first
sentence
and
the
lead
and
the
first
and
second
sentence
the
lead,
the
rest
of
the
day
of
the
sentence.
That's
ok.
A
B
A
A
A
C
C
C
A
B
D
B
And
I'm
happy
to
see
the
sentence
from
I
would
also
be
very
happy
to
see
the
ELS
being
shorter.
As
he's
already
indicated,
everything
that
can
be
easily
rented
from
the
existing
drafts
from
the
scope
of
demands
on
I
think
you
can
avoid
here,
because
what
what
I
know
from
the
working
3g
Giggy
you
send
along
LS.
They
have
interactions
with
other
working
groups,
so
there
is
a
lot
of
cancer
coming
out
of
them.
B
A
B
C
A
A
A
E
Ok,
so
a
very
quick
update
about
the
protocol
in
data
model
I
just
put
down
some
slides
and
especially
with
respect
to
the
data
model.
I
just
just
have
one
single
slide,
because
I
think
there's
very
little
to
discuss.
We
will
see
now
in
this
meeting,
but
really
I
think
that
there
are
not
so
many
things
that
we
still
have
to
do
in
order
to
complete
that
document
as
to
the
protocol,
I
will
start
with
it.
So
next,
please
there
are
some
new
things
that
we
introduced
in
version
3
of
the
document.
E
Basically,
we
try
to
work
on
all
of
the
comments
that
we
gather
it
during
the
last
meeting
in
Honolulu,
and
this
has
allowed
us
to
make
some
alignment
with
all
of
the
other
documents,
and
this
reflects
in
a
couple
of
modification
inside
the
state
machines,
both
the
participant
and,
let's
say
producer
and
consumer
state
machines.
Then
I
will
just
briefly
discuss
some
preliminary
feedback
that
I
received
on
the
mailing
list
very
useful
feedback.
E
Actually,
the
only
thing
is
that
I'm
now
working
on
that,
because
I
received
the
emails
from
the
other
guys
on
the
mailing
list.
Just
at
the
end
of
last
week,
so
I
see
everybody's
busy
and
I
had
a
look
at
the
email
setting.
There
had
plenty
of
useful
information
and
I'm
not
worried
about
the
comments
by
the
way,
because
I
think
that
they're
all
in
line
with
what
we
were
doing
so
we
will
briefly
discuss
this,
but
this
is
really
working
progress,
so
you
have
been
word
next
slide,
please.
E
E
The
most
important
thing
is
related
to
how
we
try
and
match
the
higher-level
clue,
protocol
information
to
the
lower
layer,
signaling
information,
and
so
basically,
this
relates
to
the
discussion
that
we
had
about
the
SDP
offer
answer,
which
is
clearly
explained
inside
signaling
document
and
which
had
some
impact
on
our
state
machines,
which
was,
let's
say
not
not
as
clear
as
it
should
be.
Now
we
think
that
we
have
clarified
this
and
there
is
no
SD
p
0
a
state
anymore
inside
the
higher-level
state
machines.
E
We
had
a
thorough
review
of
the
signaling
document
before
working
on
this
and
we
do
believe
that
now
they
Darrell
E
match
they
are
really
complementary
and
they
were
quite
correctly
together.
A
minor
thing
that
I
would
like
to
mention
I
did
not
put
anything
in
his
slides,
because
this
is
much
more
academic.
E
So
it's
something
that
really
looks
quite
stable
now
and
perhaps
I
will
circulate
some
information
about
this
on
the
mailing
list
in
the
next
few
weeks,
because
we
are,
let's
say
bringing
this
work
to
an
end
right
now.
Okay,
about
the
scheme
updates.
These
are
minor
things
and
there
are
more
things
that
have
been
suggested
on.
The
mailing
list
were
basically
embedding,
although
all
of
them.
We
just
briefly
touch
upon
this
particular
point
next,
please.
E
So
this
is
how
the
crew
participant
looks
like
right.
Now,
it's
very
simple:
this
is
the
top
layer
state
diagram
which,
as
you
can
see,
embeds
the
lower
layer,
media
provider
and
media
consumer
state
diagrams,
which
are,
let's
say,
drill
down
state
diagrams.
So
this
is
the
one
that
orchestrates
the
overall
interaction
when
you
are
using
clue
when
you
are,
you
have
a
clue
enabled
device.
E
So
basically,
there
is
just
the
options
phase
which
is
associated
with
negotiation
of
the
clue
session,
and
then,
when
you
transit
to
the
active
state,
you
can
play
either
one
of
the
two
roles,
media
provider
or
media
consumer
or
both
of
them.
Clearly,
next
one,
please
also
here
without
digging
too
much
into
the
details.
The
main
modification
is
in
the
middle
of
this
diagram,
where
we
had
the
sdp
Oh,
a
box
which
now
has
been
removed
because
you
are
giving
for
granted-
and
this
is
explained
in
the
document
we
are
giving
for
granted.
E
There
is
behind
the
scenes,
some
sort
of
SDP
negotiation
which
can
happen
in
case
you
have
to
properly
set
up
the
clue
session,
but
from
the
clue
protocol
perspective,
you
just
see
those
states
that
are
there.
There
are
a
couple
of
suggestions
related
to
how
to
potentially
optimize
a
bit
these
transitions
and
I
think
that
they
are
actually
okay,
I,
don't
know
if
you
had
a
look
at
these
suggestions
on
the
mailing
list,
but
anyhow
I
will
come
back
with
feedback
on
the
mailing
list
related
to
this
point
neck.
E
Sorry,
next,
please,
okay
again,
this
is
the
media
consumers
state
machine
which,
by
the
way,
I
think
is
the
more
complicated
one
but
which
now
has
been
modified
a
bit.
If
you
remember,
there
was
all
the
discussion
about
the
riad
verte,
Iseman
tanned.
This
has
been
removed
from
the
protocol
and
as
a
side
note,
I
would
also
remarked
that
we
have.
We
have
had
to
remove
the
differential
mechanism.
E
E
We
had
been
working
on
it,
but
I
went
through
all
of
the
discussion
that
we
had,
and
my
feeling
was
that
there
was
no
consensus
on
keeping
that
mechanism
inside
the
protocol
and
you
can
follow
the
thread
on
mailing
list
in
order
to
check
this
out.
Okay.
Next
one,
please
here,
I
just
tried
to
summarize
feedbacks
that
I
received.
E
It
was
right,
because
there
are
couple
of
terms
that
we
keep
on
using,
which
should
be
formally
aligned
with
the
document,
the
framework
document,
one
for
old
clue,
capable
device
and
clue
session
instead
of
just
telepresence
session,
and
things
like
that.
Okay,
next
one,
please
just
one
pointer
to
the
data
model,
we
did
not
publish
the
new
version
of
the
data
model
because
we
want
to
come
out
with
the
let's
say
last
version,
at
least
from
our
perspective
of
such
document.
There
are
just
minor
things
that
you
are.
E
We
have
already
aligned
actually
inside
the
schema
apart
from
again
typos
in
text.
There
are
some
minor
inconsistencies
again
with
respect
to
the
framework.
There
are
things
that
we
decided
that
should
be
set
and
fixed
in
a
specific
way,
and
the
07
version
does
not
reflect
these
as
of
yet
because
it
was
written
before
the
the
very
last
discussions
that
we
had.
But
this
is,
I
would
say,
ready.
E
E
Yeah
there
were
yeah
just
okay
yeah.
There
were
no
more
sentences
about
the
feedback
that
we
received
here.
Actually,
the
feedback
was
from
both
Christian
groves
and
Mark
Duckworth
and
mark
arrived
second,
and
so
it
he
said
that
he
was
avoiding
to
repeat
the
main
comments
from
Christian,
but
he
added
some
useful
further
information.
So
thanks
again
I'm
already
working
on
this
by
the
way,
that's
it.
E
A
So
I
think
what
we
would
like
to
do
now
is
we.
We
need
to
get
a
good
reviews
of
those
documents.
Are
we
had
reviews
from
Christian
groves
and
mark
doctor,
and
we
need
more
reviews
and
I
think
when
we
talk
about
reviews,
it's
also
applied
to
the
signaling
also,
so
I
think
that
the
protocol
and
signaling
getting
to
be
reviewed,
so
people,
so
someone
who
reviewing
should
review
both
documents
together
in
order
to
verify
that
they
are
in
line
yeah.
A
So
anyone
who's
was
volunteering
to
you.
These
two
documents
mark
on
your
face,
I
know
that
marker
will,
if
you
don't
wish
and
we'll
review,
and
because
we
will
review
but
I'm
looking
for
I
want
name
social
mark
mark
said
he
will
review
and
the
course
I
will
review
and
Robert
okay
Robert
Robert
on
java
with
you
so
and
my.
A
Hopsin
the
throb
hands,
and
it's
good
because
he's
the
author
of
the
editor
office
of
the
signaling,
so
he
can
sue
yep.
The
protocol
is
to
be
lined
with
with
the
signaling
okay,
but
I
would
expect
to
to
look
at
those
of
them
together
to
verify
the
girl
consistent
with
each
other,
okay,
okay,
so
we
have
ma
that
were
robbed
handsome
I,
think
you're,
Paul,
saying
anything:
a
pulse.
A
B
A
A
That's
the
intention
and
again
when
people
look
at
the
signaling,
they
should
look
at
also
the
SDP,
because
there's
a
lot
of
SBP
inside
there.
As
for
the
data
schema,
we
need
also
to
review
this
one
and
to
review
it
to
see
that
it's
in
line
with
the
framework.
Yes,
with
the
framework
document
and
again.
A
D
A
E
A
B
A
That's
the
plan
again,
we
are
dependent
on
people
reviewing
the
documents.
Now
we
are
talking
about
wearing
group
last
call
currently
about
these
two
drop
because
we're
now
talking
about
the
data,
the
data
model
and
they
and
the
protocol,
but
the
same
goes
for
the
signaling,
which
will
be
Boss
drums.
A
The
data
model-
yes,
the
data
model
years,
like
I
mentioned
before
we
will
try
to
finish
all
the
working
group
documents
before
next
Nikki,
its
ambitious.
It
depends
on
on
the
reviewers,
but
at
least
I
hope.
They're
people
who
are
revealed
will
spend
some
time
the
time
now
in
order
to
do
bc
reviews.
A
B
A
A
A
Clue
signaling
the
change
I'm
doing
it
for
a
Rob
who's
who
was
not
able
to
attend
the
meeting
but
he's
in
the
jabber
room,
and
he
will
continue
to
add
it
to
be
the
editor
of
the
document.
So
we
are
thankful
for
all
his
effort
and
hope
he
will
have
the
time
to
finish
all
of
this
document
to
so
the
changes
in
the
05
version
srtp
DTLS
made
mandatory
for
crew
clue
control
media
lines.
That
was
a
change
from
last
meeting
the
other
section
added
based
on
text
proposed
by
Christian
groves.
A
A
As
far
as
I
remember-
and
there
are
some
simple
syntax
improvement
and
next
slide
since
then
we
had
comments
from
Christian
and
Paul.
He
surveyed
made
outstanding
issues
need
to
update
the
negotiation
detail
to
use
draft
I,
tfn
music
data
channel
sdp
NDG
to
negotiate
the
data
channel,
and
this
was
based
on
the
plan
that
was
decided
in
the
previous
ITF
meeting
to
produce
this
negotiation
instead
of
the
once
used
before
as
by
RTC
web.
What's
it's
called
I
forgot
the
name
for
that
one,
the
negotiation
that
RTC
what
is
using
yeah.
A
That
that
makes
sense,
but
at
least
they
the
text
should
be
consistent
when
you're
describing
what
how
you
look,
how
you
decide
that
this
is
a
couch.
This
is
a
clue,
a
call,
glue,
capable
call
based
on
this
information,
because
you
know
it
from
the
sdp
that
it's
going
to
be
done
open
for
clue
and
that's
part
of
the
change
in
labor,
yes,
Christian.
A
F
D
A
A
F
F
Trend
of
security
etc.
Yes,
but
it's
not
the
right
thing
to
do
it
for
clue:
I
mean
it.
This
is
not
include
specific
and,
for
example,
included.
Three
DPP
does
refer
to
this
and
I,
don't
think
the
gdp,
for
example,
has
landed
for
dtls
at
the
media
resource
functions
in
the
core
network,
and
so
on
then
you're
going
to
have
issues.
F
Well,
that
was
a
question.
I
don't
think
we
need
to
say
anything
in
the
security
consideration.
We
can
have
text
describing
all
this.
Yes,
it's
recommended
blah
blah
blah,
and
this
was
going
to
happen.
If
you
don't
do,
but
I
don't
think
it's
up
to
clue
to
to
mandate.
There
is
not
include
specific
reason
to
mandate
a
TLS.
C
Mode
that
that
seems
pretty
backwards.
We
have,
I
mean
in
other
working
groups
and
like
more
modern
working
groups,
that
sort
of
understand
what
the
for
the
compartment
the
internet
is.
Now
we've
gone
ahead
and
said:
no.
This
has
to
be
encrypted
because
we
know
now
more
about
what's
going
on
in
the
world
and
we
did
when
we
started
doing
description.
Is
he
stopped
and
said,
I'm,
not
sure
why
we
would
include
decided
taking
this
in
the
direction
we
did,
for
example,
in
web
RTC.
C
C
A
Think
that
I
think
that
what
Adam
is
saying
is
that
we
can
write
every
anything
we
want
it
will
go
to.
The
is
gene.
Come
back
to
us
with
some
other
recommendation
about
what
to
do
and
we
won't
have
a
choice.
So
it's
it's,
it
doesn't
matter
we
can
make.
We
can
write
nothing
and
then
we
can
get
back
kick
back
and
say
you
have
to
write
something
about
it.
So
that's
that's
the
current
and
they,
like
you,
said
that
the
current
status
what's
happening
in
DI
here.
Yes,.
B
It
seems
to
me
the
way
I
read
the
iesg
and
I
18
statements
on
this
topic,
that
their
suggestion
is
that
the
default
for
new
stuff
needs
to
be
security
and
that
you
could
argue
for
having
an
insecure
mode
if
you
really
need-
and
that
seemed
like-
and
also
an
appropriate
right
for
this
document.
So
you
know,
there's
obviously
must
support
details
as
you,
because
that
that
is
the
place.
Secure
mode.
I
think
it
will
be
worth
having
a
discussion
here
about
why
other
modes
might
be
necessary
and
what
levels
of
requirement.
A
It
goes
back
to
discussion.
We
have
because
we
have
a
documenting
in
NB
about
security
for
RTP,
and
we
were
saying
why
it's
not
mandated
to
disaster
RTP
when
you
define
payloads,
because
there
may
be
different
mechanism
by
which
you
can
secure
that
necessarily
need
to
use
DTLS.
You
can
use
other
layers
and
security
which
will
make
it
secure,
and
you
won't
do
that
and
it's
up
to
the
implementation
so
but
I
think
in
this
case,
where
we
are
doing
solution,
probably
we
will
at
least
we
should
say
that
we
should
be
supported.
B
B
D
I
mean
again
I'm,
not
positive,
that
this
is
I
mean
it's
possible.
This
is
still
the
right
thing
to
say,
but
I
mean
I
guess
the
case
I
would
be
I'm
incinerating
is
that
close
I
mean
I.
Think
people
would
expect
to
be
used
not
only
on
the
public
Internet
we're
absolutely
pls.
Everything
should
be
mandatory,
but
also
in
private
environments,
where
I
think
the
need
for
it
is
somewhat
less
compelling,
though,
given
the
races,
monitoring
and
my
shirts
as
less
compelling
as
we
once
thought,
it
was
so
so
I
mean
I.
D
Think
that
so
I
mean
absolutely
I.
Hope
that
agree
with
men
agree
to
implement
I
guess
the
matter
of
concern
would
be.
Is
it
when
we've
gone
to
some
trouble
to
make
blue
work
with
structure
all
the
SBP
to
work
with
a
lot
of
you
know,
legacy
little
boxes
and
using
a
big
detail?
S
everywhere
would
break
them
and
hopefully
updated
support
the
soon
but
I'm
not.
F
As
far
as
I
remember,
the
protocol
document
does
not
currently
because
then
we
had
a
question.
Do
we
need
to
use
catch
Megan's
onto
to
offer
both
but
I?
Guess
it's
okay,
you
can
offer
it.
S
are
to
be,
and
just
I
mean
you
don't
need
to
to
offer
both
of
you
and
that's
an
implementation
issue
and
I
have.
C
F
A
My
suggestion
will
look
at
it
sent
to
the
list
the
current.
What
this
text
say
and
say:
liquids:
okay,
I
I.
What
I
get
is
that
the
preference
is
to
have
must
be
support
and
a
lot
must
be
used.
That's
what
the
preference
here
is
and
supported.
Yes,
supported
means
that
there
can
be
other
that
it's
supported.
The
usage
is
based
on
what
you
are
using
for
security
based
on
the
specific
environment
and
the
implementations.
I.
B
A
A
A
Okay,
so
the
next
step
is
to
produce
versions.
06
was
identified
the
issues
fixed
and,
of
course,
to
do
working
the
class
call,
and
that
goes
that's
a
signaling.
That's
what
I
said
it
goes
together
with
the
protocol
and
we
have
the
reviewers
to
review
that
those
documents,
those
two
documents,
and
hopefully
we
will
be
able
to
soon
start
over
to
Nebraska
any
other
issues.
People
have
what
to
say
about
the
signaling
anything
on
the
Java
Jonathan.
A
A
So
we
have
a
zero
for
version
of
the
document
and
still
in
the
box,
the
status,
the
new
variant
version
described
RTP
usage
in
clue
and
mapping
to
clue.
We
did
some
text
changes
in
order
to
be
more
in
line
with
the
topologies
and
hopefully
there.
The
text
is
clearer
now
in
order
to
associate
the
media
in
the
different
protocol,
there
are
three
mapping
that
needs
to
be
specified,
including
the
video
encoding
to
sdp
is
done
using
the
label
attribute
in
the
sdp
and
the
encode
ID
the
RTP
media
streams
to
sdp.
A
A
For
mapping
in
RTP
stream
to
a
specific
MC
in
the
MCC,
the
crew
cab
try
these
used.
The
media
center
must
send
for
MCC
the
capture
ID
in
the
RTP
header
and
is
a
RTP
rtcp
SMS
messages.
The
document
defines
these
two
extensions
and
they
are
already
being
referencing
the
signaling
and
in
the
I
think
also
in
the
data
I
think
I
saw
them
also
in
the
data
model.
Externe.
F
A
Identifier
that
that's
been
being
used
so
so
these
are
the
major
changes.
The
state
of
the
document
needs
some
I
think
we
will
do
another
editorial
review.
We
don't
have
a
security
section,
so
we
need
to
add
the
Security
section
to
the
document
which
will
do
after
the
meeting
and
is
there
another
slider
desi
last
night,
and
so
that's
what
I
said.
There's
a
final
editorial
worth.
Neither
then,
after
that,
it
will
be
ready.
Also
for
working
group
last
call
did
anyone?
Did
anyone
read
this
document
lately?
A
A
A
B
A
A
B
A
A
That
the
problem
is
that
be
we
don't
have
most
Rob
and
Paul
hearing
there
in
the
meeting
so
to
be,
they
won't
be
able
to
be
part
of
it.
Even
if
you
do
an
offline
could
become
complicated.
First,
the
google
will
think
about
it.
Okay,
so
I
think
that-
and
the
last
thing
we
will
try
to
do
is
we
will
try
to
prepare
in
some
time
timeline
for
finishing
the
work
and
send
it
and.
B
F
A
B
A
C
A
C
B
B
B
A
D
B
B
A
A
C
C
A
C
Okay,
that's
fine
I,
just
I,
sometimes
see
groups,
try
to
schedule,
reviews
and
end
up
failing
on
the
scheduling
of
to
review.
You
know
if
you
do
it.
Basically,
when
the
drops
are
ready
rather
than
saying
well,
this
draft
is
going
to
be
this
week
and
this
other
draft
is
going
to
be
this
week
and
half
the
time.
The
reviews
don't
come
in
during
that
time
period.