►
From YouTube: IETF-CBOR-20211020-1400
Description
CBOR meeting session at IETF
2021/10/20 1400
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting//proceedings/
B
B
C
D
C
E
A
C
B
C
C
B
B
The
current
agenda
is,
as
always,
in
the
minutes
being
prepared,
so
please
come
in
there
and
also
add
to
the
minutes.
If
you
find
the
free
time
there,
two
documents
are
in
the
working
group.
Currently
that
should
be
discussed
today
and
one
is
zebra
networking
address,
network
addresses
which
has
been,
which
has
its
discusses
clear.
So
this
should
manage
to
move
forward
and
see
profile
magic,
which
I
kind
of
a
lost
track
a
bit
as
a
shepherd.
B
So
this
I
think
this
can
go
ahead.
We'll
talk
a
bit
more.
There
frank,
carson
added
the
topic
of
a
new
request
that
came
to
him
and
me
as
the
export
experts
on
the
registry
for
registration
from
outside
the
itf
on
one
oneplus
one
tag
and
then,
if
there's
no
any
other
business,
the
only
thing
left
is
to
remind
everyone
that
cutoff
is
imminent
and
where
we'll
meet
again
comments
and
topics
that
people
would
like
to
bring
up
now,
so
that
we
can
plan
ahead
for
them.
B
Yeah
on
on
the
topic
of
of
network
addresses,
yeah
francesca
basically
said
the
things
that
I
got
wrong.
So
is
there
anything
left
that
we
should
discuss
here
and
are
there
any
comments
that
we
that
should
be
brought
up,
I've
briefly
skimmed
through
them,
and
I
found
nothing
that
doesn't
look
like
it's
on
the
right
track.
A
A
C
B
Okay,
if
we
don't
have
any
more
documents,
we
can
confuse
this
with
I'd
go
over
to
find
file
magic.
This
has
been
sitting
in
a
working
group.
Last
call
for
actually
a
few
months
now,
mainly
because
there
was
a
bit
of
a
lack
of
in
working
group
reviews
more
precisely.
I
missed
that
john
provided
the
review,
so
the
delay
is
probably
on
me.
B
I've
looked
through
the
reviews
that
have
come
in
both
from
from
john
inside
the
working
group
and
from
vanderboba
from
as
has
been
requested
as
an
as
an
art
review
and
a
few
comments
from
from
dale
on
inside
that
thread,
and
to
me
it
looks
very
much
like
there
is.
The
idea
is
a
typical,
weak
support,
but
no
objections
to
the
document.
G
B
B
E
B
Well
then,
next
item
on
the
list
is
the
the
capture
registration
request,
a
customer.
You
want
to
say
a
few
words
there
or
shall
I
summarize
the
the
state
of
what
they
are
doing
and
then
you
go
on
to
why
you
think
it's
a
good
idea.
Please
do
okay,
so
the
capture
document
is
asking
for
and
I'm
posting
the
link
in
the
chat
again,
it
is
describing
a
way
to
is
describing
a
tag
that
indicates
that
that
what
is
tagged
is
a
group
of
positional
and
keyword
arguments.
B
Many
programming
languages
have
a
way
of
giving
arguments
to
a
function
that
says
argument
one
argument
to
argument
three
and
then
go
over
to
indicating
explicitly
more
of
the
some
of
the
more
exotic
arguments,
so
that
might
be.
They
probably
have
a
better
example
than
I
can
come
up
with
on
on
short
notice
that
can
be
x,
y
and
z,
coordinate
as
positional
arguments
and
then
a
boolean
argument.
B
Whether
or
not
this
vector
is
to
be
normalized
that
that
kind,
that
kind
of
arguments
the
tag
they
introduce
says
that
the
payload
of
the
tag
is
a
two
element
array.
The
first
element
is
in
the
first
element
of
that
is
an
array
of
positional
arguments,
and
the
second
is
a
map
of
a
keyword
of
keyword
arguments,
and
this
is
common
through
several
languages,
and
they
describe
that
they
like
to
use
it
also
in
situations
where
they
have
a
bit
of
more
volume
of
data
coming
through.
G
G
G
So,
even
if
it's
not
a
constrained
environment,
it
may
be
worth
saving
that
bite.
But
it's
not
a
strong
argument
for
for
going
for
one
plus
one.
I
think
it's
a
borderline
and
I'm
a
little
bit
on
the
side
of
saying.
Okay,
that's
a
legitimate
request
from
a
specific
platform
that
is
not
entirely
exotic,
so
maybe
we
should
go
for
it.
On
the
other
hand,
maybe
we
should
have
another
planning
session.
G
G
So
in
in
the
cody
md
I
have
put
in
my
tag
report
and
we
see
that
we
have
used
up
26,
27
percent
of
the
oneplus
one
range.
We
have
several
proposals
out
there.
That
would
take
sizable
chunks
out
of
that,
so
we
may
be
up
to
40
within
a
year
or
so,
for
instance,
zebra
practice
is
actually
using
a
sizeable
chunk
of
oneplus
one
tags,
but
we
we
haven't
even
reached
50
percent
and
and
we
we
are
close
to
to
the
the
10-year
milestone
for
sibo.
G
B
G
Yeah
there's
one
one
more
proposal
which
is
coming
from
the
I
think
cascary
community,
some
functional
language,
where
they
essentially
need
a
tag
to
differentiate
between
different,
otherwise,
structurally
identical
data
structures,
and
they
are
definitely
going
to
use
the
use
these
tags
on
the
wire.
So
that's
the
place
where
the
the
answer
to
christian's
question
would
be.
G
Yes,
it
makes
a
difference,
and
so
the
main
question
there
is
how
many
oneplus
one
tags
do
they
actually
need,
because
at
some
point
of
course,
the
the
likelihood
of
a
data
structure
being
used.
I
mean,
if
you
don't,
really
need
one
for
15
different
structures.
So
at
some
point
they
can
go
to
a
one
plus
one
plus
two
and
that's
actually
what
the
the
current
proposal
does.
B
There
is
the
submission
cutoff
in
five
days
from
now,
so
everyone
who
wants
to
update
their
documents,
please
be
aware
of
this
and
into
rims.
We
will
resume
only
after
itf-112
and
there
we
should
coordinate
a
bit
with
the
other
groups
that
also
have
two
bi-weekly
interims
core
is
planning
to
do
theirs
around
february.
Second
plus
minus
all
of
14
days.
B
G
B
H
D
D
F
G
A
E
A
H
C
G
A
G
G
B
C
D
H
Down
it's
it's
mostly
like.
Maybe
you
could
go
30
minutes
supposed
to
an
hour,
but
it's
better
probably
to
have
an
hour,
blocked
off
and
be
shorter,
because
then
people
get
free
time,
as
opposed
to
like
oh
we're,
going
to
run
longer,
because
people
will
just
schedule
in
the
other
30
minutes
and
as
as
barry
and
others
have
said.
Moving
the
work
forward
is
the
important
part.
A
I
just
wanted
to
remind
working
group
that
on
tomorrow's
standard
chat,
the
cd
cdl
control
document
is
scheduled
and
it's
all
green.
So
far.
So
that's
great,
but
there
is
a
number
of
people
who
haven't
commented.
Yet
ben
is
one
so
so
we'll
see
what
happens,
but
we're
also
in
is
to
retreat
virtual
asg
retreat
this
week.
So
we're
all
a
bit
slow.
G
Yeah
I
like
ira's
pointer
to
the
the
crossword
work
and
so
on.
There's
lots
of
stuff
using
sibo
in
in
various
places
and
having
something
like
like
a
sibo
state
of
the
union.
Occasionally
is
maybe
something
we
should
be
planning
for.
So
we
have
a
standing
item
using
other
seos,
but
we
don't
have
an
item
using
our
own
seo
and
we
probably
should
start
doing
that.
B
D
D
Pretty
much
entirely
to
a
discussion
of
work
towards
a
cddl,
idl
and
integration
possible,
with
multiple
build
tools,
compilers
etc.
And
we
thought
it
would
be
an
interesting
topic.
And
maybe
we
would
get
more
than
our
usual
five
or
six
people.
And
instead
we
got
19
and
we
had
people
from
five
sdos
and
from
mitre
and
from
microsoft.
Research.
People
who
don't
usually
show
up
at
tcg
meetings.