►
From YouTube: IETF-CBOR-20220907-1400
Description
CBOR meeting session at IETF
2022/09/07 1400
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting//proceedings/
A
Oh
hello,
I
was
a
bit
worried
that
my
audio
setup
switched
to
the
completely
wrong.
B
Wrong
component:
I
think
this
is
not
good.
I
hear
you
too.
A
Yeah
I
had
connectivity
issues,
okay,
so
we
don't
have
any.
We
don't
have
particular
items
on
the
agenda,
but
I
still
didn't
want
to
cancel
the
meeting
in
full
because
it
we
might
get
use
the
opportunity
to
get
a
bit
of
better
bearings
of
what
we
want
to
do
during
these
interims.
And
if
it's
just
going
through
like
like
a.
B
A
Agenda
for
the
for
the
larger
time.
I
think
that
could
be
valuable.
A
But,
as
I
understand
the
big
items
during
this
during
during
this
interim
series
will
be
the
topic
of
seaboard
2.0
and
with
carsten
just
having
left.
That
might
be.
That
might
be
a
bit
hard
to
get
bearings
on.
A
We
do
have
the
topic
of
seaboard
pact
and
time
tag,
but
time
to
see
what
pact
is,
in
my
understanding,
largely
depending
on
reviews
and
time
tag
is
waiting
for
whatever
comes
out
of
sedate.
A
So
do
you
have?
Does
any
of
you
have
items
that
we
should
keep
track
of
hello,
carson
good
to
have
you
back.
B
B
So
how
about
this
much
better.
A
C
A
On
the
topic,
so
the
the
documents
that
we
have
currently
being
worked
on
are
time,
tagged
and
tagged
and
packed
is
time
tag
still
pending
on
on
the
stage
work.
I
understand
it
is.
C
C
The
the
main
issue
in
today
right
now
is
that
actually
rfc
3339
has
some
interoperability
problems
that
we
probably
need
to
address
by
actually
doing
an
update
to
339,
which
we
were
explicitly
chartered
not
to
do
so
that
that
is
interesting,
but
the
the
parts
that
actually
migrate
over
to
the
time
tank
should
be
stable
by
now.
So
we
could
be
doing
this.
Does.
A
It
make
sense
to
push
time
tag
to
the
to
the
point
where
it
will
be
misrep
on
the
date
now
or
is
there
any
other
point
where
you
would
prefer
to
hold
this.
C
I
would
expect
today
to
be
fast
enough
that
that
this
is
pretty
much
moot,
so
I
think
we
we
can
just
push
those
two
documents
together.
Okay,
great
I
mean
the
the
time
track
is
registered,
people
are
using
it.
So
it's
not
like
we
are
in
a
particular
rush.
C
B
A
A
A
Is
this
something
where
we
should
invite
particular
groups
of
people
to
join
interims?
Is
this
something
where
we
just
need
input
on
the
mailing
list?
How
do
we
get?
How
do
we
get
this
rolling,
because
my
understanding
end
of
last
year
was
that
it
would
somehow
be
squished
into
the
into
the
end
of
2021?
A
C
Yeah,
I
think
we
still
need
some
some
implementation
effort
to
to
validate
the
the
rough
ideas
that
are
in
in
the
freezer
document
and
in
the
slide
where
that
that
has
been
generated
since
that
and
so
yeah.
The
the
next
step
is
to
to
actually
get
this
implemented,
learn
something
from
the
implementation
and
then
adjust
the
the
specifications
and
yeah.
The.
The
idea,
of
course,
is
to
have
this
done
before
the
internet
draft
deadline
for
115.
A
B
C
Yeah
I
know
the
the
the
riot
summit
was
a
really
really
really
important
event
this
week.
So
maybe
we
should
have
cancelled
things
earlier,
but
yeah.
So
I
think
it's
likely
that
that
things
will
come
up
in
one
way
or
the
other.
We
still
have
the
the
whole
issue
of
map,
like
data
structures
that
we
haven't
had
a
really
urgent
use
case.
That
has
forced
us
to
complete
that
work.
But
I
would
expect
that
to
happen
at
some
point
and
of
course
the
the
cdda
work
is.
C
C
A
B
A
B
A
C
Yeah,
I
was
just
I
like
to
remind
people
that
I'm
not
going
to
be
present
in
the
meeting
in
two
weeks
from
now,
so
I
would
expect
to
to
have
something
to
say
about
cds
in
the
meeting
four
weeks
from
now.
A
Okay,
so
then
we'll
take
care
to
decide
on
whether
or
not
we'll
have
the
meeting
in
two
weeks
in
your
time
before
that.
If,
if
there's
anything
on
the
agenda
or
not,
okay
thanks
everyone
see
you
in
two
or
four
weeks,
bye.