►
From YouTube: CBOR WG Interim Meeting, 2020-09-02
Description
CBOR WG Interim Meeting, 2020-09-02
A
A
C
C
Image
in
my
mind,
of
the
pigs
performer,
if
you
ever
had
have
been
working
on
osi
stuff.
They
love
these
pigs
performer
things
where
you
have
a
word
document
that
as
an
implementer
you,
you
fill
out
with
all
the
things
that
you
want
to
say
about
your
implementation
and
and
the
performance
means
that
there's
a
standard
set
of
essentially
questions.
You
have
to
answer,
and
I
I'm
pretty
sure
we
don't
want
to
do
that
so
that
that's
one
of
one
comment
and
the
other
comment
was
from
gennad
telling
us.
C
This
is
a
nice
document,
but
it's
a
bit
long-winded
at
some
point,
so
people
might
stop
reading
because
that's
just
too
much
much
text
for
for
the
amount
of
information
being
transferred,
and
that,
of
course,
is
a
it's
a
consideration
and
one
of
the
things.
The
things
that
may
happen
in
in
an
isd
review
is,
of
course,
that
you
add
more
of
this
stuff,
because
you
want
to
address
some
comment
and
so
more
verbiages
is
added.
So
I
think
that
that's
kind
of
the
the
opposite
direction
of
yaren's
comment.
D
C
D
A
A
A
A
C
The
the
interesting
thing
when
you
do
something
about
complex
subjects
like
like
calendars
or
human
names
or
other
things,
the
people
who
look
at
these
documents,
some
of
them
actually
find
out
about
the
complexity
of
this
subject.
For
the
first
time,
and
so
you
you
you
run
into
you,
you
need
to
interact
with
their
learning
experience
and
that
that's
a
bit
weird
but
yeah.
I
don't
think
we
really
need
to
discuss
lead
seconds
and
a
day
tech
document,
but
if
it
helps
we
might
want
to.
C
So
that
that
my
view
of
the
daytech
situation
and
with
oid,
essentially
we
we
are
stuck
on
on
one
issue,
which
is
essentially,
we
would
like
to
understand
this.
This
nesting
aspect
applying
a
tag
to
an
array
or
or
a
app,
and
so
far
nobody
has
come
up
with
one
way
of
making
this
work
that
that
feels
right.
C
So
we're
still
in
a
kind
of
exploratory
phase.
Is
there
any
such
way
that
feels
right,
or
should
we
give
up
on
on
that
feature,
or
should
we
cut
down
that
feature
to
the
most
basic
one?
So
I
think
we
need
to
continue
that
discussion,
even
though
it
may
be
a
little
bit
frustrating
because
it
seems
there
is
no
obvious
way
to
do
this
right.
D
A
D
C
When
you
do
a
design,
there
are
some
places
where,
where
I
mean
it's
just
obvious,
that
this
object
need
needs
a
square
opening
at
this
place
and
then
right,
so
you
feel
right
and
confident
and
and
so
and
then
you
have
other
things
where
yeah.
There
is
no
obvious
things,
you
could
add
complexity,
but
it's
not
quite
clear
that
you
really
need
it
or
you
can
remove
complexity,
but
then
there
might
be
applications
that
get
hurt.
C
D
D
C
Yeah,
so
there
are
some
remnants
in
this
document
from
from
a
previous
version
which
was
way
more
sophisticated
about
it,
so
not
trying
to
do
a
prefix
compression
here,
we're
just
trying
to
to
say
something
like
here's,
a
whole
array
and
all
of
these
are
object
ids.
So
we
put
the
object,
id
tag
on
the
array
and
not
on
every
single
one
of
them.
D
D
D
C
C
D
C
D
And
since
we're
unlikely
to
have
a
map
or
an
array
as
the
key,
it
probably
doesn't,
it's
probably
stops
there,
and
an
array
of
an
array
of
an
array
would
be
fine
and
I'm
not
sure
if
you
were
arbitrarily
limiting
it
to
three
or
just
you.
That
was
just
your
example.
I
think
you
were
just
that
was
just
your
example,
so
each
array
within
an
array
it
would
apply
to,
but
not
necessarily
other.
A
D
D
B
D
That
I
understand
the
rule
to
be
that
the
tag
applies
to
everything
within
an
array,
and
it
applies
to
the
key
parts
of
a
map,
and
this
rule
is
reply.
Applied,
I'm
going
to
say
recursively
as
well,
so
and
applies
all
the
way
down
an
array
as
deep
as
the
array
nests
and
if,
for
some
reason
we
had
a
raise
as
the
key
parts
of
a
map,
it
would
apply
to
that,
although
that's
probably
never
done
realistically.
But
if,
if
someone
did
do
it,
it
would
apply.
D
D
D
A
D
D
D
C
A
C
A
A
A
A
C
A
C
A
B
A
A
A
A
B
C
A
B
A
Don't
hear
anything
so
I
think
we
can
close
the
meeting
now
next
meeting
is
in
two
weeks
same
time
and
yeah
so
for
the
agenda
for
next
meeting.
I
guess
we
will
have
next
meeting
is
after
the
telechat,
so
we
can
discuss
any
issues
that
come
from
the
telechat
and
then
yeah.
We
will
see
the
hopefully
the
the
update
on
the
tags,
oid
document
and
yeah
status,
update
on
the
charter,
and
these
adoption
calls.