►
From YouTube: IETF-CELLAR-20220426-1900
Description
CELLAR meeting session at IETF
2022/04/26 1900
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting//proceedings/
A
B
B
B
B
B
B
Yeah,
so
it's
basically,
we
all
get
the
same
view.
We
get
a
consistent
view
in
the
mirroring
of
yourself
is
not
anyway
just
interesting.
I
don't
know
if
that's
an
intention
or
not,
so
I
don't
know
what
I
should
do
here
note
taking
tool.
I
I
can
open
the
note
taking
tool,
but
that
doesn't
make
the
rest
of
you
see
it.
B
B
C
B
A
B
C
B
B
B
C
B
D
B
C
B
C
B
C
B
C
C
B
D
B
B
B
B
B
B
D
B
Okay,
so
they've
expired.
It
would
be
great
to
pump
to
repost
them,
even
if
there's
no
changes
to
them.
Just
so
that
external
reviewers
can
see
that,
if
they're
like
well,
what
about
chapter
codex,
then
they
can
see
more
clearly
that
it's
the
the
other
thing,
and
you
know
we
absolutely
can
make
an
informative
reference
to
them.
If
we
need
to
meaning,
we
can
say
you
know
in
work
in
other
work.
This
is
happening
without
actually
depending
upon,
what's
actually
happening
and
that's
fine.
B
D
C
B
B
D
B
C
B
B
B
D
D
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
D
B
B
B
A
Change
about
the
v4
yeah
for
the
moment,
the
the
cuties
about
f,
everyone
is
the
speed,
so
we
are
trying
to
have
a
gpu
version
of
everyone
decoding
and
checking
the
bottlenecks
before
working
on
the
v4
and
yeah
one
on.
One
of
the
feature
we
want
is
to
to
fix
the
button
next
for
from
bit
v3
to
fixing
b4
the
the
issues
in
this
screen
about
heavy
image
processing.
A
A
D
B
Else
so
the
the
reviews
will
come
to
our
mailing
list
from
the
aid
area
director
and
the
iesg
they
get.
You
won't
don't
be
surprised
if
you
get
three
or
four
copies
of
the
email
from
from,
because
you
get
it
from
the
mailing
list
and
well
I
get
you
know,
there's
all
these
different
aliases
and
they
get
sent
to
everybody
and
it's
kind
of
a
shotgun
approach.
So
yeah
your
mail
program
might
collapse
it
to
one
message
and
mine.
B
It
shows
up
as
two
or
three
usually
and
the
the
like
before
that.
The
key
thing
is
that
we
acknowledge
that
that
we,
we
acknowledge
the
the
the
the
message
as
quickly
as
possible,
and
ideally,
we
would
put
together
a
pull
request
relating
to
that
message
that
that
set
of
of
comments,
whether
it's
one
commit
or
ten
commits,
doesn't
matter,
and
then
they
would
be
able
to
see
using
the
the
files
change
diff.
B
They
would
be
able
to
see
the
differences
that
we
proposed
and
we
and
in
some
cases
if
we
need
to
arg,
if
you
need
to
have
a
conversation
with
them,
then
you
can
have
it
in
line
in
the
message,
preferably
there,
rather
than
in
the
pull
request,
because
it
probably
won't
have
time
to
get
back
to
the
pull
request.
But
that's
my
experiences
is
better
to
do
that
and
it's
it's.
B
As
to
what
doing
so,
you
can
ask,
especially
if
you
have
any
questions
you
want
to
ask
about.
Well,
did
you
mean
this
or
I
didn't
understand,
but
anyway
we
won't
be.
We
won't
get
that
so
we'll
do
the
we'll
do
the
shepherd
report
first,
we'll
have
our
own
ad.
Do
we'll
be
do
a
review
and
then
it
will
go
to
the
rest
of
them.
B
Okay
and
some
other
people
will
be
new
because
they
just
started
in
march.
We
have
at
least
one
security
area
director,
that's
new
and
some
other
people.
I
can't
remember
who
else
has
switched,
but
some
of
them
are
because
the
the
two-year
the
two-year
appointment
ended
ends
in
march
each
every
two
years.
B
Fair
enough-
and
I
don't
maybe
I
need
to
don't
need
to
tell
you
this
or
maybe
I
do,
but
I
usually
leave
myself
logged
into
the
seller
working
group
jabber
on
the
itf
list.
So
if
you,
if
you
want
to
get
a
hold
of
me,
that's
one
good
way.
If,
if
email
isn't
working
or
you
want
to
have
a
you
know,
some
other
conversation.