►
From YouTube: CBOR WG Interim Meeting, 2020-06-17
Description
CBOR WG Interim Meeting, 2020-06-17
A
A
B
Yes,
and
so
the
an
outstanding
item
that
I
was
aware
of,
was
updating
the
changes
section
in
the
appendix,
and
that
happened
yesterday
or
today,
depending
on
which
time
zone
you
are
in,
and
we
now
have
a
more
useful
narrative
for
changes
appendix
it's,
not
just
this
bullet
list
anymore,
even
though
that
was
already
quite
useful.
The
way
it
was
done
so
I
think
that
completes
the
number
of
things
that
need
to
be
done
for.
B
Somebody
to
picked
up
so
yeah
I
think
there's
one
minor
detail
that
we
could
do
the
next
time
I'm
going
to
do
the
notable
text
draft
I
will
put
in
another
tab
before
embedded
c4
sequences.
Obviously
we
hadn't
invented
C
of
all
sequences.
Yet
when
1749
was
created,
so
we
don't
have
a
tag
for
that
and
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
have
symmetry
with
that
and
we
would
use
the
same
construction.
B
We
use
with
the
the
other
tags
defined
in
the
notable
text
document
that
we
just
mentioned
them,
but
do
not
define
them
in
the
document.
I
think
that
would
be
a
useful
little
thing
we
could
add,
but
it's
really
much
not
that
important,
because
really
people
should
be
looking
at
the
note
of
a
text
document
at
at
some
point
in
the
future.
A
Ok,
sorry
about
that
I!
Don't
know
what's
wrong
my
computer
day
for
my
at
once,
but
I
don't
know
until
when
I
disappeared,
but
I
was
saying
that
I
feel
comfortable
with
moving
document
or
word
and
publication
life
and
I
think
that
the
changes
from
last
to
mission
do
not
need.
You
are
not
big
enough
to
require
a
new
working
group
last
call.
So
if
anybody
of
the
present
has
objections
for
that
or
Jim,
and
you
also
confirm
that
I.
A
A
B
So
in
the
control
operators
there
are
two
operators
for
computing
strings
and
numbers.
There
are
two
operators
for
putting
a
B
and
F
into
a
city
year,
and
there
is
one
very
weird
control
operator
called
feature
for,
essentially
interacting
with
the
expectations
of
the
validation
machinery,
so
the
future
operator
actually
is
implemented
already
or
just
a
partial
version
of
that
is
implemented
in
the
CDP
area
to
the
the
other.
Four
operators
will
probably
happen
in
the
second
version
of
this
idea.
B
B
B
A
B
B
A
A
A
B
B
A
Yeah,
that
sounds
good
I
was
thinking
which
should
anyway
have
some
internal
meetings
after
the
idea
of
run
away.
Just
because
we
don't
know
the
participation
that
we
will
have
at
that
meeting
and
it's
good
to
have
in
terms
just
don't
know
about.
If
we
need
them
as
regularly
or
we
should
scale
down.
B
A
bit
on
how
the
asdf
above
thing
is
going
so
that
that
was
the
other
thing.
I
was
going
to
break
up
in
be
any
other
business,
but
we
now
have
a
buffer
proof.
We
have
made
asdf
at
ITF
got
all
the
idea
is
to
take
the
SDS
specification
that
was
done
by
one
him
to
Senate
and
with
all
the
work
that
might
be
involved
with
that,
and
since
there
is
certain
CDL
endeavour,
there's
also
some
some
stuff
in
there
that
is
borrowed
from
business
Ahmad
from
the
Jason's
came
out.