►
From YouTube: CBOR interim meeting, 2019-12-18
Description
CBOR interim meeting, 2019-12-18
C
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
A
Ten
is
just
the
roll-up
of
the
changes
that
were
made
based
on
the
work.
New
blasts
call
comments,
so
this
still
needs
to
be
checked
for
content,
and
then
we
have
to
move
from
RFC
XML
version
two
to
RFC
XML
version
three,
and
because
that
brings
a
lot
of
vomiting
Changez
I
thought
it
would
be
good
to
have
those
vomiting
changes
isolated
in
a
sequence
of
version
updates.
A
Symbols
I
put
in
another
version
in
between
11,
which
just
has
those
lists
similar
changes,
or
at
least
most
of
them,
and
so
there
are
a
number
of
versions
to
look
at
now,
but
10
should
be
exactly
identical
to
12,
with
respect
to
content
and
Church
will
just
be
consistent
with
the
new
conventions
and,
of
course,
the
nice
thing
about
the
new
conventions
is
that
we
now
have
a
nice
HTML
version
to
look
at.
If
that
is
your
thing,.
A
A
It's
not
just
me,
it's
not
just
too
much
well,
maybe
maybe
you
broke
it,
but.
A
A
A
The
main
issue
is
the
map
duplicate
thing
where,
where
I
haven't
managed
to
generate
a
text
proposal,
yet
I
think
we
were
pretty
clear
in
the
meeting
what
we
wanted
to
do,
but
this
still
has
to
be
expressed
in
in
text.
So
that
will
be
the
next
thing
to
do
and
there
is
Francesca's
review
I
think
that
should
be
edged.
Oh
I
also
started
talking
to
implementers
to
review
this
version
and
I
expect
there
that
implementers
will
submit
some
some
comments
during
the
next
few
weeks.
A
B
B
A
And
there's
also
to
do
to
actually
get
implemented
to
submit
comments.
The
ones
I've
got
pretty
positive.
I
asked
one
guy
to
actually
send
them
to
the
mailing
list.
You
may
have
seen
them
so
I
think
it's
good
to
get
other
implementers
to
look
at
this
end
and
see
what
they
like,
what
they
don't
like.
E
E
E
A
A
E
B
B
B
B
B
Okay,
so
why
don't
we
go
ahead
and
you
get
out
a
version,
at
least
with
the
new,
the
new
maps?
Stuff?
If
you
don't
get
the
other
things,
that's
not
gonna
worry
me
as
much
putting
the
new
map,
stuff
and
I
think
is
going
to
be
important
to
implementers.
Yes,
and
then
we
can
try
to
get
comments
before
the
15th
and
on
the
15th.
We
can
decide
whether
we're
ready
to
send
it
up
to
the
IDS
G.