►
From YouTube: RATS Architecture Design Team, 2021-03-23
Description
RATS Architecture Design Team, 2021-03-23
B
C
A
A
Cool
all
right,
wonderful
welcome,
so
I
should
call
you
it's,
mr
yogesh.
I
just
I'm
asking
partly
because
I
I
I
know
that
some
cultures
put
their
names
in
different
orders,
and
so
that's
why
I
partly.
C
C
A
Morning,
do
you
know
the
dave
song
these
the
daves?
I
know
I
know
nope.
No,
really.
Oh
okay.
It's
a
it's
from
a
skit
from
the
90s
called.
A
A
Yeah
I
cleaned
out
the
I
cleaned
it.
I
have
this
bench
for
my
tv
that,
because
it's
in
the
corner
in
a
funny
shape
I
had
to
build
years
ago-
and
I
I
cleaned
it
out
about
a
month
ago,
because
there
were
like
three
dead
console
systems
wired
still
into
it-
that
you
know
like
because
because
there's
holes
in
the
like
there's
three
three
shelves:
three
four
shelves
open
and
then
there's
holes
between
them.
So
you
can
put
the
cables
through
yeah,
but.
A
That
you
can
it's
hard
to
get
it
out
again,
because
it's
so
nice,
so
you
actually
just
disassemble
the
whole
thing
and
the
shelves
actually
just
unstack
and
and
then
I
cleared
it
all
out,
but
to
do
that,
I
actually
had
to
remove
all
the
accumulated
vhs
and
dvd
and
blah
blah
blahs
that
were
all
piled
up
behind
it
and
and
and
lo
and
behold,
there's
my
aunt
box
set
of
animaniacs
of
pinky
and
the
brain,
and
what
I
discovered
was
that
when
you
go
into
the
menu
in
each
dvd
and
it
lists,
you
know
the
list
like
three
episodes
that
there's
a
button
at
the
bottom
called
says
more,
and
some
of
them
have
two
more
episodes
that
I
had
never
bothered
to
access.
A
So
you
had
to
go
on
a
pinky
in
the
brain.
Well,
yeah!
Every
saturday
morning
you
just
put
a
dvd
in
and
yeah
that's
eat
cereal
right.
So
there
you
go.
So
what
are
we
gonna
do
tonight?
Michael,
that's
right,
exactly
try
to
finish
the
document
same
thing.
We
do
every
week
dave
there
we
go
all
right,
so
we
have
dave
baylor.
A
Andrew
quinn
and
we
have
yogesh
mr
yogesh
he's
from
verizon
joining
us
today,
apparently
with,
as
did
you
say,
thomas
harjano,
or
is
it
facadi?
I
don't
remember
which
one
you
said.
No,
that's
your
colleague
it's.
E
C
A
For
sati
yeah,
we
have
a
top
two.
We
have
two
thomases
and.
F
A
A
I
think
this
one
is
trivially
closable.
I.
F
A
A
D
Yeah,
I
think
the
history
is
the
paragraph
right
above
this
got
added
later,
and
so
that
lost
some
of
the
context,
and
so
this
is
restoring
the
original
context.
D
A
G
D
D
A
Okay,
okay,
so
hank
suggested
that
we
move
this
this
paragraph
up,
so
that
it's
since
it
applies
to
all
the
examples,
instead
of
having
it
in
the
middle
of
example,
one
that
we
move
it
up
to
above
example,
one-
and
so
I
changed
the
and
above
and
subscription
and
just
said
in
the
figures
below
curly
braces
indicate
containment.
Is
that
what
you
wanted?
Hank
yep.
D
A
That
branch
existed
all
of
for
a
minute,
okay,
so
now
I
don't
know
I
was
reviewing
other
ones,
and
I
and
I
didn't
get
to
a
specific
one
that
I
could
tell
was.
D
I
can't
remember
what's
in
316,
if
that
one
might
be
easy.
I
can't
remember
because
that
was
one
that
I
did
shortly
after
the
call
last
time:
that's:
okay,
yeah.
So
this
is
one
other
one,
the
what
is
a
reliable
clock
and
you
can
see
there.
I
changed
the
word
reliable
to
trustworthy
and
added
the
paragraph
up
top,
and
so
because
the
this
came
up,
I
think
in
the
so,
if
you
go
back
to
the
issue
you'll
see,
this
is
one
of
brendan's
issues.
D
Let's
go
back
and
read
the
issue
briefly,
but
I
think
this
is
straightforward.
Okay,
he
asked
why
local
clocks
are
a
problem
since
energy
and
mcu's
have
them,
and
I
answered
saying
that
many
tes
do
not
have
trusted
clocks
and
he
suggests
clarifying
that
and
then
michael,
you
asked.
What
do
you
mean
by
a
trusted
clock?
Do
you
mean
that
they're
synchronized-
and
I
explained
my
answer
there
and
that's
what
led
to
the
text
here-
that
a
trusted
clock
from
the
te's
perspective
is
one
that
the
rich
execution
environment
cannot
tamper
with?
D
D
I
haven't
called
that,
but
I
think
the
text
does
right
now.
It
just
calls
those
synchronized
and
not
synchronized,
but
I
don't
know
if
this
document
does
but
often
in
other
groups.
We
call
those
absolute
versus
relative
clocks.
Okay
yeah
I
mean
tod
is
absolute
and.
D
A
D
A
Well,
yeah!
Well,
it
might
be,
but
you
know
I
don't
know
mars
probe
or
something
right.
D
So
time
yeah
yeah,
how
are
times
synchronized
between
spacecraft
or
you
know,
probes
and
things
I
don't
know
so
anyway,
we
don't.
We
don't
talk
about
the
other
day.
A
But
the
relevance
here
was
implicit
timekeeping
using
nonces,
and
in
that
case
we
we
care
about
the
being
able
to
measure
how
long
ago
the
evidence
was
taken
and
that's
all
fair
enough.
H
D
D
This
is
the
section
on
using
nonsense
and
yeah,
so
it
just
says
you
can
use
a
nonce
even
when
you
don't
have
such
a
clock.
Oh
all,
right,
I'm
sorry!
My
apologies
right
does
not
have
a
trustworthy
clock
right
and
similarly
1163
without
requiring
a
yeah.
D
So
elliot
feel
free
to
read
through
the
different
sections
we're
talking
about.
If
you
have
any
suggestions
or
issues,
you
know
please
follow
them
or
whatever,
but
I
think
the
questions
that
you're
asking
my
opinion
is
they're
already
answered
and
covered
in
existing
text
elsewhere
in
the
document.
But
okay
for.
A
Okay,
let's,
let's
jump
to
your
your
contribution
here,
elliott,
okay,
I
have
not
reviewed
this
one
yet
so
yeah.
H
H
Place,
but
I
I
I
in.
D
D
So
add
a
comment
just
to
capture
that
that
we
don't
want
to
merge
it,
as
is
even
if
we
like
it.
So
no
I
I
have
to
I
have
to.
H
Do
a
I'll
I'll
go
back
to
head
for
a
little
bit
on
that
and
just
re-merge
it
in,
but
the
actually
the
abstract
needs
a
slight
touch
up
there
too,
not
a
huge
move,
but
a
slight
one.
You
know
just
so
that
people
know
what
we're
talking
about
and
the
the
point
of
the
text,
though
the
main
point
of
the
text
right
is
to
just
give
a
couple,
is
to
zoom
out
a
little
bit
to
understand
why
we're
here
right
now
this
is
sort
of
just
a
start.
H
At
that
text
I
was
called
out,
I
think,
by
michael
you're,
saying
oh
you're
speaking
in
second
person
here,
and
you
know
that
that
might
be
a
a
little
issue
and
of
course
I'm
asking
questions,
but
the
the
idea
is
just
to
sort
of
warm
up
the
the
reader
a
little
bit
in
terms
of
what
it
is
we're
talking
about.
H
You
may
find
these
examples
not
well
well
fleshed
out,
but
one
of
the
things
that
you
might
want
to
think
about
then,
and
again,
this
is
not
something
that
I
would
merge
today
is
how
do
we
solve
that
problem?
At
the
end
of
the
you
know,
if
we
go
back
to
this
at
the
end
of
the
document
right,
if
you
or
if
you
follow
a
couple
of
examples
through
the
end
of
the
document,
say
here's
how
we
might
have
done
this.
A
So
I
think
that
you're
doing
elliot
as
you're
setting
us
up
for
here's
the
introduction
of
some
problems
at
the
high
level
and
that
later
on,
if
we
had
a
conclusion
which
I
guess
we
often
don't
have
it
in
rfcs,
then
we
could.
We
could
refer
back
to
it
and
say
we
solve
this
problem
with
this
and
this
and
this
well,
the
way
you
normally.
H
G
H
D
I
G
And
I'm
subscribed
to
notifications
here,
so
I
I
will
get
a
email
with
a
notification
when
elliot
pushes
things
or
changes
things.
So
if
nobody
know
what
everybody's
doing
that
elliot
would
be
okay
with
emitting
a
small
email
to
okay
look
at
this
beforehand,
so
we
can
have
a
target
discussion
next
time
and
then
everybody
can
hit
the
button.
C
C
D
D
D
Okay,
so
I,
if
you
look
at
the
paragraph
ingredient
at
the
top
and
the
paragraph
in
the
red
green
at
the
bottom,
I
was
trying
to
give
more
symmetry
between
those
two
you
can
see
up
on
the
top.
The
issue
filed
was
the
top
one
didn't
say
anything
and
the
bottom
one
had
a
nice
long
paragraph
and
I
tried
to
give
equivalent
treatment
on
both.
D
G
Yeah,
so
some
asymmetry
due
to
the
bulleted
list-
that
is
just
here
and
not
so
both
of
them
say
this
is
implementation
specific
now,
right,
yes
and
and
the
reference
value
has
this
notion
about
how
you
convey
stuff
and
the
policies
do
not
so
again.
D
D
D
If
you
remember
right,
we
didn't
have
reference
values
originally
right,
and
so
there
was
some
debate
like
some
people
had
the
view
that
reference
values
were
part
of
the
endorsements
and
other
people
had
the
view
that
reference
values
could
have
been
part
of
the
appraisal
policies
and
when
we
actually
talked
about
reference
values,
we
said
that
there's
a
different
couple,
different
varieties
that
could
even
be
completely
separate
from
that,
and
so
that's
when
we
split
out
reference
values
into
its
own
section
and
had
to
roll
for
it
right,
and
so
the
bullets
down
below
is
talking
about
the
options
of
having
reference
values
be
combined
with
one
of
the
other
conceptual
messages
or
not.
D
D
We
didn't
say
that
if
your
appraisal
policy
could
be
combined
with
say
the
endorsement,
which
I
guess
it
could,
I
guess
that's
that's.
If
you
want
me
to
add
bullets,
I
could
do
that,
although
it
doesn't
seem
like
to
repeat
the
same
point
like
387
is
saying
reference,
values
and
appraisal
policies
could
be
combined
if,
if
you're
a
pre,
if
your
appraisal
policy
and
reference
values
comes
from
the
same
entity,
that's
the
first
bullet.
D
It
wouldn't
make
sense,
in
my
opinion,
to
copy
exactly
that
same
text
in
both
places
just
like
in
the
endorsement.
We
don't
say,
oh,
and
this
could
include
reference
values
or
whatever.
Seeing
like
seems
like
another
possibility,
is
that
three
bullets
and
things
could
be
moved.
If,
if
you
thought
it
was
important,
I
I
don't
have
a
strong
opinion
either
way.
If
you
thought
it
was
important,
we
can
move
it
to
the
place.
The
in
the
document
that
says
some
roles
can
be
combined.
D
G
Exactly
so
exactly
with
combined
roles,
there
might
be
combined
conceptual
messages.
Attestation
results
might
also
include
evidence,
reference
values
and
appraisal
policies
might
come
together.
There
was
these
discussions.
Where
do
ranges
for
comparison
go
so
so,
if
you
have
a
range
of
of
things
like
a
number
range
or
I
don't
know,
a
range
of
are
choices,
how
is
this
a
policy,
or
is
it
a
reference
value.
G
G
Yeah
also
so
there's
a
lot
of
side
domains
here,
but
but
I
think
the
concept
of
comp
composition
of
conceptual
messages
could
be
the
same
place
where
there's
this
composition
of
roles.
I
think
that's
a
very
good
answer
to
this.
Ask
here
and
yeah.
D
I'm
taking
that
as
a
question
for
hank,
I
don't
have
an
opinion,
but
the
police,
the
number
the
place
that
I
was
referring
to
you
can't
see
in
here,
but
it
would
be
line
822
if
he
were
to
open
up
in
a
separate
window.
822
is
the
roles
and
entities
section
which
is
the
one
that
says
at
the
top.
The
first
paragraph
says:
I'm
just
going
to
read
it
on
the
screen.
An
entity
in
the
rats
architecture
includes
at
least
one
of
the
roles
defined
in
this
document.
D
An
entity
can
aggregate
more
than
one
role
into
itself.
These
collapsed
roles
combine
the
duties
of
multiple
roles.
That's
the
place
that
if
we
needed
to
add
something
or
move
something
to
is
probably
it's
the
rules
and
entities
section,
six.
D
Yeah
see
first,
paragraph
is
the
one
that
I
was
reading
there.
That's
the
only
place
that
I
can
think
of.
That
would
be
their
place.
To
put
it
if
we
were
to
move
the
equivalent
of
the
bullets
or
to
add
something.
G
Yeah
and
I
would
prefer
moving,
I
think
that
was
the
question
directed
to
me
implicitly
yeah.
I
would
think
that
I
would
like
to
have
these
options,
how
to
combine
things
potentially
here,
and
that
would,
I
hope,
include
that
bullet
list,
so.
A
I
thought
it
was
fine,
as
is
so
so
so
the
action
here
that
I'm
hearing
is
either
to
go
back
to
the
issue
and
say:
please
add
something
to
section
six
as
well,
but
then
accept
this
commit
because
we're
not
changing
anything
here
or
we
want
to
go.
Do
both.
We
want
to
remove
some
text
here,
so
we
want
to
change
this
commit
and
add
to
the
other
part.
So.
G
G
I
would
actually,
I
would
actually
prefer
moving
these
concepts
of
how
things
can
be
aggregated,
generalize
it
and
put
it
into
a
into
the
roles
and
entities
section,
and
that
would
be
my
by
my
proposal
not
doing
the
actual
contribution.
D
So
then,
michael
like
we
might
keep
the
issue
open,
but
where's
the
pull
request.
A
Okay,
so
we
are
gonna.
We're
gonna
merge
that
one
to
also.
E
A
Section
six
about
roles
about
appraisal.
D
G
Exactly
that
is
fine
with
me.
We
don't
have
to
remove
the
content.
I
just
found
it
surprisingly
specific.
There.
D
Actually,
I
guess
I
can
I
can
do
it.
I
need
to
remove
that
label
that
says,
has
pull
request
now
that
it's
open
for
a
different
reason.
I'll.
Do
it
sure.
A
D
Right
so
I
think
hank
you
filed
this
one
saying
you
didn't
even
know
what
that
sentence
was
supposed
to
be
the
1341
I
read
through
it
twice
figured
out
what
I
think
it
was
supposed,
what
it
meant
decided
that
it
was
not
adding
a
point
that
wasn't
already
that
wasn't
redundant
with
other
text
that
was
in
here,
and
so
I
thought
it
was
easier
to
remove
it
than
to
try
to
fix
up
the
wording,
but
the
only
concept
that
I
saw.
A
I
guess
I
I'm
gonna.
I
have
a
question
about
about
some
of
this-
that
I
think
I'll.
If
we
have
a
minute
at
the
end,
I'm
going
to
ask,
but
I
don't
think
it's
relevant
to
rats,
but
rather
to
handles
it
just
occurs
to
me.
I
was
thinking
about
something
in
the
shower
about
about
another
rfc,
where
this
might
be
applicable.
So,
okay,
so
I'm
gonna
click.
The
button
here
on.
A
This
okay
and
that
one
is
now:
no
that's
not
the
right
one
anyway.
Okay,
reword
description
of
I
don't.
A
D
Yet
and
that
one
I
don't,
we
had
a
bunch
of
comments
on
296
as
well.
I
don't
know
that
that
has
been
updated.
Sorry
that
one
is
still
open
and
this
one
yeah
I
haven't
looked
at
this
one
yeah.
I
reviewed
this
one
last
week.
I
think
it
hasn't
made
the
updates.
Yet
if
I
remember
write
it
so
I
didn't
really
review
it
yet
because
it
looked
like
it'd
been
the
comments.
Weren't
good.
G
A
Yeah
and-
and
there
was
there-
was
some
discussion
somewhere
about-
I
thought
in
email
I
saw
about
how
often
we
were
doing.
We
were
translating
this
to
this,
because
in
some
cases
it
didn't
apply
like
the
question
was
relating
to
the
ccc
or
something
because
it
might
not
be
a
rats
yeah.
It
was
like
this.
Okay,
like
the
question
was,
I
thought
we
had
a
comment
that
you
know.
G
G
A
The
comment
here
from
lawrence,
so
that
was
made
after
our
meeting
yeah
yeah.
So
I
think
that
was
worth
conversation
about
whether
or
not
this
is.
This
is
really
a
change
we
want
to
make
or
whether
we
want
to
retain
this
as
a
generic
term,
as
opposed
to
this
as
a
specific
term
and
whether
we
put
the
s
in
capital.
I
guess
in
that
case.
D
G
A
Okay,
all
right,
so
the
homework
is
that
we
need
to
come
back
through
this
list
and
do
things.
So
some
of
these
are
probably
pretty
innocuous
and
should
be
just
merged
in.
Maybe
we
should
just
figure
that
out
now
are
there?
Are
there
ones?
Is
there
low?
Is
there
things
we
should?
We
should
commit
to
the
batch
right
now.
G
We
can
raise
a
new
issue
on
the
rats,
expanded
reds
thing
and
make
sure
if
it's
not
overloading
some
assumptions
here
and
if
there's
no
other
problem
with
this
pr
at
some
point,
then
we
can
just
merge
it
because
I
don't
think
there's
so
many
contentious
items
in
there.
A
D
Will
that
delete
the
commas?
Okay,
apparently,
okay,
cool.
D
My
comment
is
technically
resolved
because
that's
what
the
immigrants
is.
One
answers
that
and
the
one
that's
in
green
is
then
correct.
According
to
lawrence's
distinction,.
A
Is
there
an
internal
bug
tracker
now
for
github
and
microsoft.
D
D
A
A
Yeah,
I
I
was
gonna
say
in
you
know,
ipv6
anyway.
The
only
reason
I
have
a
nat
64
running
on
my
network
is
to
talk
to
github,
so
okay,
so
I
think
this
is
fine.
We
can
clarify.
A
A
A
That's
part
of
the
remote
remote
attestation,
the
the
top
one
is.
D
D
G
D
D
D
Now
you're
gonna
conf
yeah
yeah.
There
you
go
num
yeah.
D
And
then
well,
the
problem
is
now
the
word
r
has
to
be
is,
and
then
you
need
the
at
the.
G
Yeah,
that's
the
only
thing
I
realized.
I
changed
my
mind.
Basically
when
I
was
half
through
so
I
was
like
no.
A
A
D
F
D
D
The
verifier
checks
the
values
of
some
claims
against
constraints
specified
in
their
appraisal
policies,
378,
something
like
in
the
oh
they're
lying
party
of
in
their
appraisal
policy.
Yeah.
You
can
see
in
374
red,
it
said
its
appraisal
policy
and
changed
to
appraisal
policies,
plural
in
378
green,
and
I
wanted
that
changed
back
to
singular.
At
least
that
was
my
suggestion.
D
A
D
A
G
Oh
is
yeah,
apparently
there
is
missing
there.
G
G
Yeah
I
mean
yeah,
I
was
speaking
out
loud,
so
that's
that's
not
also
not
a
very
good
text.
D
I
don't
know
what
it
means
that
this
that
the
setup
design
I
I
still
have
a
hard
time
pricing.
It.
D
G
D
D
Okay,
so
maybe
you
want
passive
tense
there,
something
like
and
typically
a
main
router
yeah
and
typically
a
main
router
in
the
group
is
designated
or
something
like
that
or
one
router
is
designated
to
be
the
main
routers.
E
G
D
D
D
F
A
Well,
oh,
I
have
this
configuration
where,
if
you
phone
my
cell
phone,
which
doesn't
work
in
my
basement
because
of
basement,
then
it
it
forwards
through
sip
to
my
desk
and
my
other
phone
and
my
other
phone
and
back
to
my
mobile
phone
through
ip.
So
everything
rings
at
the
same
time-
and
you
know
you
have
to
like
hit-
hang
up
on
all
of
them
before
it
stops,
which
is
a
feature
not
a
bug
but
still
except.
D
D
D
D
E
E
G
Along
and
every
text
has
this
thing
with
me
that
the
verse,
the
first
third
of
the
text
is
always
the
most
reviewable
that
they
have
a
lot
of
changes
and
then,
when
it
gets
to
the
body,
people
already
know
what
they're
talking
about
and
of
terminology
and
that
it's
better,
typically
yeah
and
it's
same
here.
A
This
is
why,
well,
I
don't
know,
are
they:
are
they
separate
commits?
They
may
all
be
at
the
bad
side
of
the
verge.
You
might
actually
have
a
commit
that
notes
why
you
did
this
all
right.
I
see
thomas
you
have
to
leave
thanks
for
being
here,
at
least
for
this.
G
A
Many
lists,
but
it's
a
good
idea,
so
I'd
like
to
see
that
sentence
restored.
I
guess.
G
Yeah,
but
I
I
I
don't
remember
the
intent,
and
that
is
bad
because
I
I
think
I
remember
every
intent
here
so
I
would
be
fine
with
reversing
it,
and
I
will
come
back
to
this,
so
we
can
just
get
this
cleaned
up
yeah
because
I
don't
think
I
did
that
on
purpose.
But
I
have
to
re-read
the
context
and
I
will
make
a
note
for
myself.
A
Well,
what
I
would
like
to
do
is
is
so
we're
gonna
go
through
the
suggestions
and
get
back
to
them.
There
we
go
okay
and
so
we're
gonna
leave
this
comment
open
and
we'll
figure
out
why
that
happened,
but
let's
just
take
the
time
to
get
the
suggestions
there.
This
looks
good
to
me.
Can.
A
E
G
G
G
Okay,
that's
me,
then,
remove
it,
please
this.
What
apparently
the
idea
here
that
the
multi-tenant
isolation
of
privacy
as
well
of
central
information,
is
apparently
a
bad
example.
I
came
up
for
it
for
the
because
I
thought
it
would
be
a
good
example.
I'm
fine
with
blood
pressure,
monitor,
make
it
a
less
problematic
thing.
G
Actually
I
thought
you
would
have
might
might
have
liked
it's
microsoft
dave,
but
in
this
case
I
did
not
get
the
point,
so
I
don't
want
to
do
anything
for
that.
Just
here.
A
Remote
does
include
containers
and
applications.
Your
blood
pressure
monitor
may
further.
So
that's
what
you're
saying
instead
of
multi-tenant
architecture,
you
would
suggest
we
say
a
blood
pressure
monitor.
D
D
G
That's
a
stub,
that's
an
interesting
point.
I
apparently
lost
track
of
my
own
thoughts
that
just
went
back
yeah.
There
is
so
we
are
referencing
daa
by
a
reference
to
daa.
G
G
G
D
A
Yeah,
okay,
so
that
you
can
put
the
and
back
in
and
with
the
right
reference.
A
Yeah,
that's
a
missing.
A
D
D
D
E
D
A
All
right!
Well,
let
me
let
me
explain
so
yeah.
The
point
is
that
on
a
mobile
phone
me
as
the
owner,
I
might
be
able
to
report.
If
I
can
fully
control
those
attestation
keys,
I
may
be
able
to
sign
evidence
that
I
like,
rather
than
what
the
relying
party
would
like
to
know
about
how
my
phone
hasn't
been
tampered
with.
D
Well,
the
red
text
implies
that
on
your
phone,
the
user
does
not
it's
not
an
if
it
implies
that
you
do
have
full
control
over
the
keys,
and
I
didn't
like
that
implication,
and
so
I
deleted
that
thing
that
might
be
implying
you're,
not
trying
to
say
michael
right
but
leaving
the
stuff.
That
does
still
convey
that
implicitly.
G
D
I
think
you
removed
it.
Yeah
remove
smart
quotes.
D
In
order
to
establishes
it's
just
established.
D
D
Yeah,
no
did
you
add
that
one
to
batch?
I
don't
remember.
I
did.
I
think
here
because
it's
talking
about
public
cryptography
and
it
says
confidentiality
is
not
necessary.
That's
true
for
the
public
key.
You
still
can't
need
confidentially
a
private
key,
so
I
added
a
public
keys.
So
I
added.
D
D
D
That
I
would
also
like
that
restored
because
I
don't
think
that
one
is
editorial.
That's
removing
a
technical
point.
That's
not
made
anyplace
else.
D
Did
there,
I
I'm
sorry
yeah,
it
looked
like
you've
taken
those
two
sentences
and
collapsed
them
into
one
just
down
below
my
comment
here,
but
I
think
that
I
need
the
some
of
the
elaboration
kept.
G
Yeah,
maybe
I
have
1306
yeah.
This
is
I
I
think
I
removed
that
accidentally
all.
I
G
Yeah,
thank
you.
Thank
you
michael.
I
think
that
is
my.
I
didn't
really
glean
the
sense,
so
that
was
also
gear
was
quoting
it
totally
happy
with
that.
So
I
would
undo
the
change
in
the
the
beginning
of
the
sentence.
The
line
here
can.
H
E
H
H
H
H
G
D
D
H
Elliot's
correct:
this
is
good
yeah
by
the
way.
While
I
have
the
floor,
I'll
just
add
a
comment
about
the
security
considerations
section.
I
think
it
could
go
with
it.
It
could
do
with
the
chapeau
and
because
we're
not
talking
about
a
protocol
here
and
so
what
you
guys
are
really
describing
are,
I
think,
are
security
requirements
of
the
protocols
involved
with
rats.
Am
I
wrong
you're
not
wrong?
D
I
mean
in
some
sense
some
of
them
are
chronometer
protocols.
Other
ones
might
be
requirements
for
things
that
you
don't
know
in
a
protocol.
There
are
things
you
want
to
be
doing
in
you
know
the
setting
that
might
not
be
protocol.
That
might
be,
you
know,
do
it
in
a
physically
secure
facility,
their
architectural
requirement,
their
security
requirements
for
architecture
for
solutions,
yeah
solutions
which
involve
protocols
and
protocols,
implementations
and
processes.
Yeah.
H
A
A
Sorry
yeah,
I
was
mute
talking
to
mute.
Sorry,
it
read
it.
It
told
me
that
I
it
that
it
was
out
of
date
and
I
had
to
hit
refresh
and
then
it
undid
all
my
all
my
my
batch.
So
that's,
I
guess
another
reason
not
to
make
the
batch
very
big.
A
Which
which,
which
which
pull
request,
was
it
elliot?
You
did
this,
you
just
pushed
something
on
the
other
one.
You
were
working
on
the
the
one
with
the
abstract,
etc.
That's
what
you're
talking
about.
A
A
A
Okay,
so
I
was
just
going
to
pull
yours
up
just
for
the
fun
of
it
elliot.
A
Okay,
so
you've
now
moved
it
into
the
introduction
here
and
you've
reworked
the
the
abstract
as
well.
H
A
Yeah
so
let's,
let's
take
a
good
look
at
this
and
I
I
think
it's
probably
fine,
but
let's
take
a
good
look
at
this
and
either.