►
From YouTube: RATS Architecture Design Team, 2021-02-05
Description
RATS Architecture Design Team, 2021-02-05
A
B
A
B
A
A
All
right
anyway,
so
I
went
through
the
last
two
days
and
oh,
we
have
new
new
issues.
Okay
and
I've
been
through,
and
I've
put
up
this
tag
on
all
the
tickets,
issues
that
have
a
pull
request,
and
so
we
have
15
of
them
and
I'm
gonna
go
through
right
after
this
meeting
and
commit
the
ones
that
seem
to
have
three
or
more
approvals
without
comments.
A
H
E
Consideration
one,
the
other
one
is
finishing
off
the
example
which
I
sort
of
handed
over
to
hank,
hank
and
eric,
because
my
my
my
task
is
finished
there
and
the
third
one
is
an
extension
to
the
freshness
section.
The
subsection
that
deals
with
handles
about
the
discussion
around
the
window
of
ebooks.
That
one
needs
to
keep
well.
I
C
248,
yes,
yeah,
I
threw
a
little
text
into
the
chat
window.
I
know
I
could
have
committed,
but
I
was
seeing
if
anybody
wanted
to
go
that
way.
I
had
a
little
tech
through
the
button
for
some
things
that
weren't
completely
handled
there.
So
if
you
just
want
to
look
at
the
text
and
people
like
it,
then
we
can
always
do
a
commit
on
it.
C
D
C
A
A
D
D
C
A
A
D
G
D
A
G
D
G
D
G
D
D
Okay,
so
here
is
pointing
to
freshness,
but
the
after
we
moved
up
the
text
that
used
to
be
the
beginning
of
this
section.
There's
another
subsection
underneath
freshness,
that's
very
specific
to
handles,
and
so
first
I'd
recommend
referencing
that,
instead
of
the
less
specific
freshness
section,
so
the
first
of
two
points.
D
The
second
of
two
points
is
that
the
text
up
there
talks
about
three
ways
to
deal
with
freshness
with
handles,
or
at
least
three
example
ways.
You
can
see.
I've
quoted
that
paragraph,
so
you
have
to
scroll
up
and
it's
examples
because
it
uses
such
as,
and
so
it
would
help
if
this
one
was
gonna.
If
the
text
here
would
say
which
mechanism
it
was
going
to
use,
whether
it's
one
of
those
three
or
something
else
and
so
it'll,
be
more
understandable
in
context.
D
A
D
D
Is
it
using
a
counter?
Is
it
including
two
handles
and
messages,
or
is
it
requiring
retries
in
the
case
of
matching
handles
or
is
it
required?
I
could
say
it's
four
or
not
three,
or
is
it
by
buffering
incoming
messages
for
some
time
or
something
else,
which
is
the
intent
in
the
example
walkthrough
we're
going
to
do
here
because
we
have.
This
is
just
an
example
right,
so
any
one
of
those
is
fine
or
even
a
fifth
one.
A
D
Right
now
it
doesn't
do
any
of
those
right
and,
and
so
it
doesn't
actually
have
any
way
to
to
deal
with
time.
Synchronization
the
old,
the
red
text
does.
If
you
look
at
the
red
text
right
so
well,
actually
I
don't
remember.
I
can't
say
that
the
red
text
does
without
looking,
so
maybe
it
doesn't.
I
thought
it
did.
A
A
D
Yeah,
so
in
the
green
text
right
you
see
where
the
attestation
result
co
and
yeah.
No,
this
one
doesn't
drain.
You
can
see
in
the
green
text
here
right.
The
attestation
result
uses
h,
prime,
in
the
bottom
line,
to
the
right
and
in
the
line
right
above
that
all
of
the
entities
got
h.
Prime,
that's
not
the
question
here.
The
question
is:
what
happens
if
h,
prime?
The
relying
party
did
not
get
h,
prime,
before
that
line,
what
happens.
D
A
D
D
C
H
C
D
A
D
D
A
D
C
A
So
so
the
reason,
the
reason
why
we
need
to
have
we
need
to
know
whether
you
are
buffering
zero
results,
in
other
words
drop.
It
one
result
where
you
can
somehow
know
it's
always
the
latest
one
or
end
results
where
you
just
have
to
keep
them
forever.
Right
and
and
dave's
point
is
that
the
keep
them
forever.
There's
an
attack
on
that,
so
we
wouldn't.
We
would
prefer
not
to
specify
that,
but.
D
To
be
clear,
I'm
fine
if
we
use
that
in
this
example
right,
because
it's
just
an
example,
if
that's
the
simplest
way
to
describe
stuff,
it's
fine,
it's
fine
with
me
if
you
say,
and
we're
going
to
use
the
buffering
solution
here
in
this
example
is
in
this
example.
I
don't
have
any
objection
to
that.
So,
if
that's
the
simplest
way
to
do
the
text,
that's
fine,
I'm
just
saying
if
I
was
going
to
implement
it,
I
wouldn't
choose
that.
But
as
far
as
you
know,
this
isn't
how
you
implement
it.
K
D
D
A
D
It's
because
the
definition
provided
in
epic
freshness,
there's
four
definitions
there
in
that
paragraph,
and
so
the
definition
would
be
replaced
by
you
know,
is
fresh
as
discussed
in
freshness
where,
in
this
example
the,
if
there's
a
mish-match,
it
will
require
a
re-transmission.
You
know
maybe
there's
a
shorter
way
to
say
it,
but
something
like
that,
because
the
identification
is
meaningless
here,
we
need
to
say
which
definition.
D
And
you
see
that
paragraph
there
provides
four
of
them,
so
the
definition
is
four
of
them,
so
we
just
need
to
replace
the
definition
with
you
know
something
that
means
the
case
you
can
see
or
by
requiring
retries
in
the
case
of
matching
handles.
That's
the
case
where
the
you
have
the
drop,
and
so
that's
the
one
we're
going
to
pick
here.
D
D
H
D
A
A
A
D
Okay,
that's
the
question
I
was
just
asking
when
we
were
looking
at
the
diagram
is
what
happens
if
that
line
didn't
make
it?
And
I'm
not
saying
we
got
to
change
the
diagram,
it
might
just
be
useful
to
add
a
parenthetical
or
something
that
says
you
know
if
the
relying
party
had
not
gotten
it
yet,
then
it
would
be
dropped.
Something
like
that
would
be
a
fine
clarifying
here
which
does
not
change
the
diagram
or
the
flow.
D
A
A
D
D
D
D
Okay,
this
is
about
diagram,
design
and
correctness
either.
This
is
true
for
every
diagram
and
the
you
know
all
the
diagrams
in
the
whole
appendix
here
either
the
only
time
that
it's
okay
to
include
a
time
in
the
actual
message,
meaning
not
a
delta,
but
the
actual
time
is
where
the
center
of
the
receiver
has
synchronized
clocks.
This
example
does
not
have
that,
so
we
should
never
ever
see
a
time
by
itself
as
opposed
to
a
delta.
D
D
Text
is
right.
Well,
old
style
is
right.
You
can
see
it's
a
different
message
being
referred
to
here.
That's
the
attestation,
which
is
the
evidence,
so
it's
actually
higher
up,
but
only
a
delta
is
interesting,
so
it
needs
to
go
back
to
I
think
whatever
was
in
the
well.
That
was
broken
there
too.
I
think
it's
supposed
to
be.
Oh
yeah.
I
think
that's
right.
What
you're
highlighting
now
is
what
it
should
say.
D
D
D
D
D
A
D
Tedious,
I
have
to
do
another
read
through
to
make
sure
it's
completely
fixed,
but
I
noticed
that
there's
no
discussion
of
the
use
of
those
times
in
the
text
under
the
table,
but
if
it's
the
same
as
the
previous
section,
it's
okay
and
I
just
go
back
and
check
now
that
I
know
what
I
don't
know,
the
drop
one
is
intended,
which
is
the
simplest
to
explain
it
might
be.
Okay,
I'd
have
to
check.
G
J
D
G
A
G
D
A
A
D
A
A
15
participation
night,
you
know
june
june
22
I
go
into
the
teacher,
went
like
you
know:
wtf,
like
why'd,
I
get
a
d,
I'm
she's
like
oh
you're,
a
great
student,
I'm
like
yeah,
well
where's
my
mark
and
she
said
well
richard.
I
I
couldn't
find
her
richard.
She
couldn't
find
her
richard
in
the
class,
so
you
know
anyway.
She
finally
finished
like
richard
michaelson
or
something
I
mean
that's,
who
she
thought.
I
was
the
whole
year.
Okay,
there
were.
D
J
D
D
E
D
E
D
E
A
H
A
D
G
D
D
E
D
It's
only
a
denial
of
service
if
you
can
block
it
to
a
single
entity
right
like
the
receiver
right,
if
you
block
it
to
the
receiver,
then
then
then
there's
a
dial
of
service
attack.
If
you
do
it
to
just
the
sender,
it's
an
allen
service
attack.
If
you
do
it
to
both
of
them,
it's
not
a
denial
of
service
attack.
It's
just
a
stillness
attack.
D
A
I
B
E
B
E
E
A
E
G
E
D
E
D
A
D
D
D
G
D
I
A
E
A
D
A
E
G
A
G
A
D
G
D
D
H
D
D
A
A
G
H
A
D
D
A
D
A
What
I
really
hope
is
that
the
shepherd
will
start
their
write
up
and
our
ad
will
start
and
that
we
may
have
one
or
two
issues
that
we
still
need
to
close,
but
I
hope
they're,
trivial
and
and
then
recognizing
that
our
shepherd
might
raise
some
issues
anyway.
So
that's
the
goal,
but
I
would
like
to
have
a
stable
document
for
them
to
read.
You
can
always
generate.
A
A
Okay
cool,
so
I'll
just
mention
for
those
of
you
who
aren't
from
maybe
aren't
familiar
with
the
the
process
that
we
wind
up
with
a
shepherd
write-up.
Who
may
make
some
comments?
It
goes
to
our
area
director,
which
is
roman,
who
will
probably
do
a
fairly
large
amount
of
review,
and
then
it
goes
to
the
iesg
and
if
for
lucky,
then
there
will
be
nothing
other
than
what
roman
has
said
to
us.