►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Realize
this
that
that
we
have
this
power
that
that
we
have
these
capacities
and
then
you
know
slowly
move
that
into
into
execution
and
there's
multiple
ways
to
do
that.
But
but
you
can
already
see
that
you
know
how
big
and
amazing
the
potential
is
only
eight
weeks
in,
and
this
was
just
getting
started.
A
So
moving
on
to
the
assessments
that
I
bet
a
lot
of
you
are,
I
met
a
lot
of
proposals
are
really
interested
about
about
the
assessments
and
wants
them
to
be
published.
So
let's
talk
a
bit
about
it.
So,
first
of
all
so
we
started
by
so
this
week
we
were,
we
removed
the
scores
of
like
all
community
advisors
who
left
the
blank
assessment,
so
they
just
gave
a
score
and
didn't
give
a
rationale.
A
So
this
was
clearly
shared
in
the
guidelines
and
in
the
town
halls
and
with
some
numerous
emails
and
announcements-
and
you
know
I
think
it's
you
know
it's
it's
it's
completely
understandable
that
for
a
lot
of
people,
you
know
they
missed
that
message
or
you
know,
maybe
they
were
just
like
excited
to
get
started,
so
they
just
did
it
and-
and
we
appreciate
all
of
you
and
I'm
actually
now
after
looking
at
the
statistics
like
I'm,
actually
we'll
talk
about
it
in
a
different
slide,
you
know
I'm.
A
A
So
when
we
go
look
at
this
entire
innovation
stage,
phase
that
we
we
just
finished
and
that's
the
most
important
metric
okay.
So
what
what
was?
How
did
actual
community
members
assess
the
quality
of
like
like
the
best
proposals
like
war?
So
this
is
like
this
is
just
means
for
the
catalyst
team
assessing,
but
also
the
community
assessing
itself.
A
A
It
means
that
it
means
we're
doing
really
well,
and
it
also
means
that
now
we
have
a
baseline
and
we
can
continue
to
measure
the
stats
going
to
fund
three
and
four
see
if
see
if
it
gets
improved,
see
if
it
decreases
identify
these
kind
of
things
like
you
know,
in
the
largest
scale
of
things,
if
our
innovation
process
is
working
well,
and
so
we
have
a
first
measurement,
that's
from
a
real
body
of
of
like,
like,
like
a
very
large
number
of
both
proposers
and
assessors
in
ways
that
make
me
feel
confident
about
this
course.
A
It's
pretty
it's
pretty
reliable.
It's
like
pretty
indicative
of
actually
how
the
community
is,
because
we
have
so
many
data
points.
Compare
it
to
fund
one,
the
top
10
proposals.
There
got
a
much
higher
score,
but
the
data
was
was
much
less
reliable.
We
had
only
had
like
for
some
some
proposals.
You
only
had
like
one
or
two
reviewers.
A
lot
of
reviews
didn't
have
any
rationale:
it's
a
different
story.
A
It's
like
it's
hard
to
compare
like
because
because
we
have
so
little
data
and
it's
so
exciting
to
have
real
data,
so
I
think
I
think
also
another
thing
we
can
see
is
that
compared
to
fund
one
with
a
small
focus
group
fan
two
in
general.
Judging
was
more
critical.
So
so
you
know
it's
not
like
it's
not
like
everybody
got
a
score
of
five.
A
You
know,
I
think
I
think
we
see
that
there's
like
a
a
really
strong
critical
element
and
of
course
you
know
you
can
look
at
the
other
90
of
proposals,
and
you
can
see
that.
Actually
you
know
we,
let's,
let's
move
to
the
next
slide,
it's
a
little
bit
more
clear,
so
you
can
see
that
the
average
score
you
know
putting
aside
the
10,
the
top
10,
the
average
score
was
2.5.
So
this
is
like
very
like
a
really
critical
group
of
people
in
a
good
way.
A
So
it's
like
it's
not
easy
to
get
a
high
score
with
our
process
with
the
community
advisors
and
that
and
that's
a
really
good
thing
and
we
keep
pushing
people
to
for
excellence.
You
know
we're
not
just
giving
them
five
stars.
A
Blank
checks
all
right.
So
let's
talk
about
these
blank
assessments,
one
of
the
things
we
were
curious
about
is
you
know,
although
we're
we're
disregarding
the
blank
scores
in
the
voting
app
pair
our
guideline,
I
was
curious
to
to
learn
so
like.
If
you
compare
all
these
black
assessments
to
to
people
who
gave
assessment
to
the
rationale
was
actually
the
score
difference
so
and
the
for
me,
the
the
conclusion
is
actually
that
it
kind
of
surprisingly
representative
so
like,
although,
like
almost
half
of
all
of
our
assessments,
were
blank.
A
But
then
you
calculate
all
the
all
the
scores,
including
those
who
including
bank
statements
and
that's
just
2.6.
So
you
know
just
like,
like
around
the
zero
0.1
difference,
so
you
know
and
that
you
know
what
do
we
learn
from
that?
I
think
I
think
we
learned
that
people
that
came
with
a
you
know
they
didn't
come
up
with
the
rationale.
A
Like
I
mean
again,
we
can't
know
for
certain,
but
but
my
hypothesis
is
that
the
people
that
that
entered
the
blank
blank
score
actually
did
review
this
their
proposal
seriously,
and
you
know
actually
they
tried
to
do
a
good
job
and
assess
it.
And
you
know
maybe
they
were
just
didn't
we're
not
exposed
to
the
guidelines,
and
it
was
done
in
probably
done
in
good
faith.
So
so
that's
nice
to
see
all
right.
So
so,
what's
next
with
this
assessment
thing
so
so,
first
of
all,
what
did
we
do
so?
A
First
of
all,
we
just
we
narrowed
a
bit
our
role.
You
know
we
just
removed
the
blank
ratings,
so
they're
not
calculated
in
the
total
score
people
are
getting.
So
maybe
a
lot
of
proposers
noticed
that
initially
they
were
like,
I
got
25
reviews,
but
now
on
f12
or
something
like
that,
that's
because
we
we
remove
these
blank
ratings.
A
Another
thing
is
like:
if
you're
going
out
to
your
your
proposals
and
id
scale,
you'll
see
that
we
added
to
each
proposal
you
know
to
on
to
the
bottom
of
each
proposal.
We
added
a
summary
of
of
all
the
notes
that
reviewers
gave
like
sorted
by
category,
and
you
know-
and
I
really
want
to
thank
like
eric
and
anna
from
our
community
team
and
the
comms
teams
that
basically
had
to
do
like
a
lot
of
manual
work
to
to
copy
paste
and
format
all
these
things.
A
A
A
A
The
funds
like
an
attractive
place
for
proposers
that
you
know
like
regardless,
like
people
like
you
or
don't
like
you,
you're
still
gonna,
learn
you're
still
gonna,
get
constructive
feedback
and
and
give
you
the
tools
to
to
improve
so
yeah.
After
after
this
town
hall,
I'm
gonna
flip
the
flip,
the
settings
and
all
the
assessment
scores
are
going
to
be
made
visible,
so
everybody
can
see
them
and
they
will
be
also
displayed
next
to
the
next
two
proposals
in
the
voting.
A
App
all
right
so
another
another
big
issue
is
everybody
wants
to,
including
me
everybody.
You
know
when
when
when
voting,
so
it's
coming
we're
working
on
it
last
week,
I
said
it
will
take
us
a
week
or
two
to
provide
a
time
and
it's
still
gonna
take
a
week
like
it's
gonna
take
two
weeks
so
next
week
we
will.
We
will
give
you
a
timeline,
and
I
know
I
know
where,
and
I
mean
again
everybody,
including
me.
A
We
really
want
to
to
get
started,
and
I
know
that
you
know
we
built
so
much
energy
and
potential.
You
know
that
that
I'm
sure
people
just
like
dying
to
go
and
execute
on
their
proposals
and
start
hiring
people,
and
I
I
super
understand
and
sympathize
I
mean
the
only
consultation
I
can
give
is
that
once
we
get
over
this
hump
and
manage
delivery,
then
you
know
that's
basically
been
the
blocking
thing
and
and
then
fund
three
four
five.
You
know
they're
just
gonna.
A
A
A
One
of
one
of
the
issues
that
came
to
our
attention
was
that
in
the
id
scale
landing
page
there
was,
we
did
put
dates.
We
did
an
announcement
there
that
the
dates
probably
gonna
change,
but
you
know,
I
think
I
think
we
owe
better
to
the
community
and
make
sure
this.
This
timing
is
up
up
to
date,
so
we
updated
it
now
and-
and
we
will
continue
to
and
will
continue
to
improve
the
protocol
of
like
once
once
there.
Unfortunately,
there
are
delays
that
we
will.
A
We
will
make
sure
that
it's
clearly
communicated
to
to
everybody,
because
I'm
sure
everybody's,
like
trying
to
make
plans
based
on
this
timing
but
yeah
but
fan
two
is
not
a
great
time
to
to
to
to
plan
based
on
timing.
It's
it's
just
our
first
iteration
in
a
pub
with
the
public
funds
and
it's
gonna
be
the
the
the
I.
I
yeah,
I
called
it
for
like,
like
the
chaotic
wild
fund,
you
know
and
and
it
just
lives
to
it,
to
the
hype.
A
Okay,
what
I
did
want
to
give
I
do
want
to
give
you
some
information,
so
just
a
bit
of
a
preview
about
how
how
voting
registration
is
working.
So
this
with
a
caveat.
Okay,
this
explanation
is
pretty
abstract,
just
like
just
like
an
overview,
a
preview
of
how
it's
going
to
look
like
and
in
the
coming
weeks,
we're
going
to
like
support
the
community
so
much
in
getting
you
getting
you
registered
and
voting,
it's
so
important,
and
so
you
know
this
is
just
like
a
a
pale
comparison.
What's
what
will
happen?
You
know
we
will?
A
We
will
have
videos
we
would
have
guides
we'll
have
a
support
team.
We
might
even
do
like
events
where
people
can.
You
know,
register
together.
A
You
know
we're
gonna,
do
everything
we
can
in
order
to
make
this
process,
although
it's
fairly
complex
like
like
most
things
in
in
using
blockchain
technology,
but
we
will
we
try
to
do
our
best
to
at
least
communicate
in
communicate
the
necessary
steps
in
a
in
a
simple,
user-friendly
way,
saying
that
you
know
just
giving
you
some
some
some
early
information,
how
it
looks
like
okay,
so
once
you
know
so,
none
of
this
right
now
is
available.
A
A
Okay,
the
official
dedulus
website,
if
you
want
to
lose
all
your
funds,
download
the
wallet
from
a
different
website-
okay
like
if
you
want
to
get
scammed,
use
some
other
link,
but
going
forward.
You
know
very,
very
clear:
there's
only
going
to
be
one
place
where
you
can
one
link
one
website,
the
deadlock's
official
website,
where
you
can
download
the
deadlifts
catalyst
when
we
will
announce
it.
Okay,
so
just
follow
the
official
announcement,
don't
believe
anybody
else.
A
Next
step
is
once
you
download
the
wallet
and
sync
it.
You
will
need
to
recover
the
wallet.
So
the
deadlifts
wallet
is
basically
a
fork
of
of
dead
loose.
You
should
have
all
the
security
guarantees
that
that
the
dead,
delus
wallet
provides
so
again
we're
committed
to
give
you
a
safe
environment.
So
we've
been
using
this
tool,
that's
been
like
vetted
for
this
recovery
and
and
and.
A
And
that
is
going
to
be
something
that's
going
to
happen
in
fun,
2,
maybe
also
in
front
3,
but
going
forward.
You
won't
need
a
step,
but
but
for
fun
too.
Yes,
you
need
to
recover
your
wallet
once
again
after
that,
in
the
in
the
wallet
itself,
you
will
see
a
an
icon
for
voting
a
voting
center
you're
going
to
click
on
it.
A
A
What
it
does
it's.
It
provides
some
metadata
and
a
signature
that
confirms.
What's
your,
how
much
ada
you
have
staked
okay,
this
is
like
a
proof
of
a
proof
of
stake.
If
you
will,
then,
once
you
sign
that
you
will
need
to
wait
for
one
hour
to
make
sure
that
this
transaction
has
been
as,
as
you
know,
sufficiently
confirmed
on
the
blockchain.
A
A
It
happens,
it's
an
existing
risk,
but
we
want
to
minimize
this
risk
because
you
know
if,
if
you
just
go
ahead
and
confirm
and
and
go
forward,
you
might
find
yourself
at
the
time
of
the
voting
that
that
you
know
when
you,
when
we,
when
we're
trying
to
confirm
this,
this
looking
looking
at
the
main
net,
taking
a
snapshot
trying
to
look
at
the
this
original
transaction
that
it's
it's
not
there,
okay
and
the
only
way
to
assure
that
it's
going
to
be
there.
A
It's
going
to
be
to
wait
is
one
hour,
so
you
can
also
wait
by
the
way.
If
you
want
to
be
a
thousand
percent
sure
that
the
the
registration
transaction
is
confirmed,
you
should
wait
18
hours
but
that's
like,
but
but
for
99.999
percent
of
cases
it
one
hour
should
be
sufficient.
So
that's
our
recommendation.
A
Following
that
you
there
will
be
a
qr
code
that
will
be
generated,
and
then
you
can
use
the
mobile
app
to
to
scan
the
code,
input
the
pin
code
to
to
decrypt
the
information
on
the
qr
code
and
you're
done.
Okay,
so
not
as
easy
as,
let's
say,
withdrawing
cash
from
an
atm
machine.
But.
A
But
I
think,
but
but
it's
the
best
we
could
do
in
in
the
time
we
had
and
and
of
course,
we're
we're
going
to
iterate
and
make
it
easier
and
easier
as
time
goes
by
so
this
this
is.
This
is
like
with
the
hardest
the
hardest
registration
flow
you
know
ever
and
we're
just
going
to
improve
from
from
here
on
out
and
obviously
yeah.
A
A
So,
first
of
all,
we
send
a
feedback
form
from
the
community
advisors
to
to
tell
us
about
the
process
if
they're
happy
about
it.
So
we're
going
to
review
the
feedback
and
and
communicate
it
back
here
to
the
town
hall.
What
was
the
our
analysis
and
conclusions
and
next
steps
and
how
we're
going
to
do
a
better
job
for
fund
three?
A
With
with
the
community
the
assessment
process,
we're
gonna,
publish
a
form
to
collect
feedback
about
the
final
results
and
the
feedback
for
proposals
and
voters
just
to
check
your
own
satisfaction
and
and
and
pick
your
brain
about
how
we
can
improve
it.
So
you
know
we
will
we
will.
A
We
will
send
it
through
the
regular
channels
and
also
you
know,
once
we
get
it,
we'll
analyze
it
and
we'll
we'll
feed
it
back
to
you,
and
this
week
we
were
supposed
to
have
samuel
lazarus
come
in
and
give
a
presentation
about
how
to
do
voting
registration
with
the
cli
tool
and,
unfortunately,
I
believe
he's
out
sick.
A
A
So
you
know,
and
also
know
that
you
know
just
because
we're
having
some
delays
in
the
fun
to
governance
doesn't
mean
we
are
the
length
of
three.
You
know
we're
just
gonna
we're
gonna
push
forward
with
it.
I
suggest
you
know
if
you're,
if
you're
a
proposer
and
you
wanna
you
wanna
propose
for
funds3,
you
know
you
can
already
you
know
already
getting
you
a
hint.
You
know
you
can
already
start
working
on
that.
You
know
another
thing,
that's
going
to
happen
in
fund
three.
A
A
So
another
interesting
thing,
and-
and
I
will
of
course
I
will
give
you
a
lot
of-
we
will
publish
some
guidelines
and
some
advice
about
how
to
do
that,
and
and
what
are
the
best
practices
for
defining
a
challenge
because
that's,
for
example,
working
with
id
scale.
We
know
that
there's
like
a
lot
of
best
practices,
how
to
how
to
go
through
this
process
and
and
do
it.
So
a
challenge
is
very:
it's
like
it's
effective
and
measurable
and
impactful
and
engaging,
and
that.
A
A
A
So
last
week
I
presented
this
idea
that
everybody
from
the
community
can
can
make
a
can
make
a
kind
of
like
a
a
recommended
ballot
like
list
all
the
votes
of
yes,
no
and
share
them
publicly
as
a
recommendation
and
explain
the
rationale
behind
it
and
and
allow
other
people
to
to
support
that
that
recommendation
and
but
we
didn't
break
it
down
concretely
how
how
it's
done,
how
do
you
submit
it,
etc?
A
So
that's
something
on
my
on
my
to-do
list
for
this
week
and
I
hope
to
do
some
in
the
coming
weeks,
some
early
analysis
and
addressing
of
a
lot
of
issues
that
were
raised
through
the
catalyst
problem,
sensing
challenge
and-
and
lastly-
and
this
is
like
the
big
exciting
thing-
we've
been
working-
really
really
hard,
aligning
different
different
parts
of
the
iohk
organization.
Also,
this
you
know
feels
like
cf
the
community
around
around
a
roadmap
for
catalyst
for
the
next
six
months,
and
that's
that's
a
big
deal.
A
A
One
thing
I
can
I
can
share
right
now.
Is
that
basically
for
iohk,
I
think
that
this
it's
been
like,
I
would
say,
like
maybe
surprise
and
joy
and
and-
and
you
know,
feeling
really
great
about
about
the
progress
about
the
outcomes
and
results
of
fun
too,
and
how
it's
looking
for,
how
it's
looking
and
because
of
that.
A
You
know
the
the
next
six
months
that
we're
gonna
see
we're
gonna,
see
growth
in
funds
that
are
under
control,
also
growth
in
in
the
kind
of
resources
we
have
internally
and
hopefully
getting
getting
some
help
more
more
manpower
to
to
manage
these
processes
and
be
even
more
efficient
and
quick,
and
so
I'm
really
looking
forward
to
you
know,
and
also
maybe
a
certain
thing.
You
know
there's
going
to
be
an
increase
of
scope
of
what's
being
covered
and
we're
going
to
move
even
beyond
treasury
into
more
things.
A
So,
just
like
a
funny
preview,
I
will
everything
will
be
clear
once
the
roadmap
is,
is,
is
done
and
processed
and
ready
to
be
communicated.
That
will
take
a
few
weeks,
but
it's
just
letting
you
know
it's
happening
in
the
in
the
background,
silently
all
right,
so
I'm
gonna
give
you
the
stage,
so
I'm
gonna
stop
the
presentation.
A
A
A
All
right
so,
first
of
all,
I
see
like
lots
of
questions
that
only
have
one
vote
or
zero
votes
like.
So,
if
you
want
me
to
prioritize
a
question,
go
to
the
questions
and
vote
on
it
and
then
I'll
dedicate
my
time.
A
A
Just
one
many
countless
decisions,
I
can't
even
track.
Let's
see,
I
can
see
like
my
favorite
decision
or
like
let's
see
so
so
one
thing
we
did
is
like
we,
we
started
to
introduce
a
process
to
to
update
the
timelines
more
more
consistently
and
don't
leave
like
like
on
the
landing
cage.
You
wait
for
a
few
weeks
like
the
old
timeline,
and
it
really
was
not.
A
A
Usually
we
raise
something
between
five
to
ten
different
things
that
needs
to
be
improved
and
we
have
suggest
solutions
and
then
we
assign
the
solutions
and
then,
like
you,
know
the
next
week
we
track
how
this
would
went
on
and
and
we're
doing
it
repetitively
and,
like
you
know,
I
can
try
to
kind
of.
A
I
kind
of
like
open
up
my
back
my
document
in
the
background
and
share
a
bit
like
what
we're
what
we're
doing
so
yeah.
So
one
of
the
things.
Okay,
so
example.
One
thing
is
realize
that
a
lot
of
people
don't
have
capacity
to
to
actually
follow
all
these
live
broadcasts,
because
it's
time
intensive
so
and
also
it's
a
lot
easier
for
a
lot
of
podcasters
and
and
people
and
and
people
who
do
dissemination
of
information
to
consume
written
content.
A
So,
for
example,
this
week-
and
you
will
see
it
probably
tomorrow
or
the
next
after
tomorrow-
there
will
be
a
written
summary
of
the
town
hall
that
we
will
distribute.
A
Let's
see
another
thing
we're
doing,
for
example,
is
we
we
decided
to
start
working
on
a
short
video
to
really
give
a
you
know
kind
of
like
an
overview
of
the
project
for
for
new
arrival,
so
they
don't
have
to
catch
up.
So
much,
and
I
don't
know
these
are
just
like
three
items
out
of
like
you
know,
maybe
eight
and.
A
I
do
actually
want
to
give
you
every
week
kind
of
an
update
of
like
what
we're
you
know
what
things
we've
done
to
improve
and
right
now
we're
a
bit
swamp,
just
trying
to
get
fun
to
out
of
the
door,
but
I
think
once
we
nail
that
we
can,
we
can
introduce
a
process
where
actually,
in
this
town
halls,
we
actually
review
improvements
like
specific
actions
we
took
and
and
how
we
address
the
problems
that
were
raised,
and
I
think
that's
that's
definitely
something
to
do
for
fund
three.
For
example,
okay,.
A
A
A
It's
not
like
one
person,
one
vote
where
you
can
say
like
okay,
10
votes
here,
12
votes
here,
but
it's
also
the
the
the
the
voting
power
is.
You
know
a
person
voted
with
a
thousand
ada
and
then
another
person
voted
with
125
ada
and
we're
going
to
have
probably
hundreds,
if
not
thousands,
of
participants.
A
So
I
think
the
chances
that
two
proposals
end
up
with
exactly
the
same
amount
of
yes
and
no
votes
and
like
like
the
sum
of
their
votes,
is
like
the
same,
and
it
just
so
happens
that
that
that
they're
they're
just
on
the
edge
of
funding-
and
it's
so
extremely
unlikely
that
at
that
point
we
stopped
thinking
about
it
and
said
okay.
This
is
like
one,
it's
gonna.
This
is
like
a
one
in
a
million
chance,
so
we're
not
even
gonna
gonna
bother.
I
would
say
like
something
as.
A
A
I
mean
the
one
thing
sure
is
like
you
know:
we
need
to
work
with
the
funds
we
have.
I
mean
just
like
keeping
it
consistent
being
consistent
with
the
rules.
A
A
A
You
know
that's
like
in,
but
it's
not
like
a
hard
constraint
like
you
can
be
creative
and
figure
out
a
way
how
to
vote
for
multiple
wallets.
You
know
by,
I
think
one.
One
way
you
can
do
this
is.
A
Maybe
maybe
you
can
you
can
you
can
use
the
qr
code
from
to
scan
you
know
to
to
scanning
in
a
voting
app,
that's
on
one
device
and
then
have
a
second
mobile
device
that
you
scan
a
different
qr
code
that
was
originated
from
a
different
wallet,
so
it's
like,
if
you
really
you
know,
if
you
really
want
to
to
vote
from
several
wallets
and
fun
too,
you
know
there's
a
path
for
you
to
do
it.
You
know
we
just
need
to
get
a
bit
creative.
A
A
A
I
don't
know
if
team
is
on
the
call,
but
you
know
we
will,
if
he's
around,
or
have
updates
about
that
we
can.
We
can
give
them
as
far
as
I
knew
it
was.
It
was
ongoing,
but
I
can
check
okay,
yeah
twitter
companies
going
live
soon.
Great
thanks.
Thank
you.
Iohk
host.
A
A
A
I
like
your
voice
and
I
like
your
energy
and
I
like
how
you
want
to
drive
things
to
happen
faster.
I
I
often
feel
the
same,
and
you
know
I
want
to
things
to
happen
already,
and
all
I
can
say
is
that
part
of
I
mean
it's
a
complicated.
It's
a
complicated
answer.
Okay,
so
I
break
it
down
into
a
few
parts.
A
So
one
is
that
we
want
to
drive
excellence
and
part
of
driving
excellence
is
is
saying
that,
like
there
is
a
finite
amount
of
resources
and
you
need
to
earn
that.
You
know
we're
not
just
like
we're
raising
the
threshold
that
that
there
is
always
some
some
level
of
of
a
high
bar
for
competition.
You
know
you
need
that
that,
and
I
think
that's
plays
for
the
treasury
long
term
to
establish
really
high
standards
and
and
establish
values
of
excellence.
A
So
I
think
it's
important
that
if
it's
like
the
fact
that
it's
a
bit
hard
and
takes
a
lot
of
effort
to
to
get
funding,
it's,
I
think
it
especially
now
at
the
early
early
stage
when
we
define
the
culture,
it's
a
good
thing,
okay.
So
the
second
thing
is
that
second
element
of
this
is
that
you.
A
Is
that
you
you
want
to
you
want
to
validate
properly
that
that
the
process
is
is
working
okay
and
the
process
is
not
hacked
or
distorted
or
is
not
accepted
by
the
community
before
you
move
forward.
So
before
we
just
like
distribute
millions,
you
know
we
want
to.
We
want
to
validate
the
processes
as
well.
We
want
to
validate
the
community,
approves.
We
want
to
see,
for
example,
at
the
end
of
each
fund.
A
We
do
we
do
a
big
survey
with
the
community
of
like
how
do
you
you
know
what
do
you
think
about
the
impact
and
the
and
the
fairness
and
the
usability
of
the
process
and
it's
and
this
process?
This
is
a
consent.
You
know
we
we're
not
it's
not
our
money,
it's
not
we
making
it.
It's
like
your
money,
it's
a
community's
money
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
when
we
distribute
it,
we
distribute
it
from
a
place
of
consent.
The
community
saying
like
okay,
this
is
awesome.
We
want.
A
A
Is
is
a
lot
about?
Okay,
I'm
gonna
say
something
a
bit
philosophical.
A
So
this
is
like
an
analogy:
okay,
but
looking
at
ecosystems
of
forests
and
trees,
you
can
see
that,
like
a
lot
of
people,
a
lot
of
people
in
modern
forestry,
they
kind
of
assume
that
they
can
plant
a
tree.
You
know
because
it
doesn't
have
any
shade
and
just
gets
direct
sun.
You
know
it
will
grow
really
well,
but
what
we,
what
we
know
from
from
trees,
from
research,
about
trees,
forestry,
ecosystem,
etc?
A
A
A
So
then,
when
you
have
this
like
really
sound
tree
that
have
like
really
good
foundations,
then
you
get
these
like
giant
sequoia
trees
that
are
like
you
know,
hundreds
of
feet
up
in
the
air
and
and
also
live
for
a
very
long
time,
and
that's
kind
of
like
our
philosophy,
and
I
think
being
being
it's
also
been
kind
of
like
the
cardinal
philosophy.
Is
that
you
know
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
sound
foundations.
A
You
know
that
that
that
communities
communities
were
informed
community
is
trained,
and
you
know
that
that
we,
we
are
basing
our
decisions
a
lot
on,
based
on
data
and
past
experience
that
we're
not
becoming
like
too
attractive
to
er.
Actually,
by
the
way
I
did
I
have,
I
haven't
been
on
a
farm,
but
I
did
went
on.
I
went
to
a
sequoia
forest
last
week
and
it
was
like
this
blew
my
mind
and
I
and
I
started
to
read
a
lot
about
three
ecosystems.
So
that's
why?
A
But,
but
but
anyway,
the
the
the
thing
is.
This,
like
the
whole
catalyst
process
is
really
is,
is
pretty
complex.
It's
a
radical
process.
It
takes
time
to
it's
a
time
to
to
learn
it
to
adapt
it
to
iterate
around
it,
and
if
you
pour
in
too
much
money,
you
know
it
will
break
under
its
own
pressure.
You
will
not
be
ready
and
we
will
get
like
bad
outcomes
and
they
will.
They
will
start
to
be.
A
You
know
we
would
get.
I
I
think
there
will
be
some
kind
of
destruction
that
that's
going
to
get
created
and
and
we
won't
be
using
the
money
in
in
a
good
way.
So,
but
on
the
other
hand
you
know
I
I
don't
understand
the
sentiment.
The
sentiment
is
like
now:
cardano
needs
to
grow.
You
know
we're
having
we're
deploying
smart
contracts
soon.
We
want
to
be
ready
and
you
know
we're
in
a
very
competitive
market
and
we
have
all
the
you
know.
A
We
have
most
of
our
tools
and
resources
in
place
to
do
it.
So,
let's
just
do
it
totally,
you
know
I,
I
kind
of
I
totally
agree
with
you,
but
the
way
we're
going
to
implement
it
is
that
you
will
see
you
will
see
like
how
much
funds
you
know
funds
with
going
to
control.
You
will
see
how
much
funds
four
you
will
see,
how
much
fund
five
you
will
see
the
roadmap
for
the
next
six
months
and
after
you,
after
you'll,
get
all
this
information.
A
You
know
tell
us
that
we're
not
growing
quickly,
because
we
we
definitely
plan
to
definitely
plan
to
to
to
grow
pretty
quickly,
but
but
you
know
step
by
step,
so
you
know
I
I
think
I
can
continue
to
answer
this.
It's
like
a
fascinating
question.
I
can
continue
to
talk
about
it,
but
I
hope
you
get
my.
I
hope
you
get
my
gist
and.
A
And
understand
they
understand
they
understand
their
perspective.
I
mean
okay,
one
more
point.
One
more
point
is
that
you
know
looking
at
startups
in
general,
like
okay,
when
you
give
funding
like
even
internally
for
for
fun
too,
you
know,
there's
like
a
lot
of
community
discussion
around
how
we
want
to
first
allocate
small
amounts
of
funds.
You
know
to
let
people
get
experience
and
prove
that
they
can
that
they
can
execute
and
not
force.
A
You
know
and
and
just
adopt
best
practices
of,
like
you
see
how
startups
get
accelerated
projects
get
funded,
and
you
see
this
is
a
pattern
that
is
working
pretty
well,
and
I
think
it
goes
the
same
for
for
the
fund
is
itself
you
can
see.
You
can
look
at
fun
too
at
catalyst
at
its
own
kind
of
process,
project
that
needs
to
prove
itself
a
bit
and-
and
I
think,
working
under
these
funds
constraints
is
only
only
good.
A
Only
good
just
improves
quality
for
the
community
makes
us
more
lean
and
more
efficient,
and
then
when,
when
we
lean
and
efficient,
you
know,
then
you
pour
in
the
money
and
then
we
use
it
like
a
killer.
You
know
like
a
sniper,
sorry
for
the
violent
metaphor
you
know,
but
or
because
you
you
can
we
grow
a
beautiful
security,
okay
and
it
will
go
very
high
very
fast
all
right.
A
But
thanks
for
the
question,
thanks
for
the
question
and
the
argument,
I
think
it's
great
to
have
this
kind
of
discussions
in
the
community
and
there
will
be
a
point
where
you
will
you
you
will
you
will
be
the
decider
about
what
kind
of
funding
pace
and
you
know
it's
already.
A
Okay,
will
the
female
fan
3
be
the
improvement
of
the
cardano
network
in
the
next
six
months
too?
Or
will
it
be
more
specific,
great
question?
I
think
the
general
my
general
assumption
is
this:
we're
going
to
kind
of
continue
with
this
similar
theme
challenge
and
I'm
actually,
I
think
maybe
it's
a
good
idea
to
have
a
some
sort
of
a
community
discussion
about
it.
Let's
get
your
feedback.
A
If
there's
ways
you
can
improve
it
for
funds3,
like
you
know,
is
it
like
if
we
want
to
make
it
more
specific
or
we
want
to
start
a
different
challenge
in
parallel,
like
I'm
happy
to
get
your
your
feedback
feedback
about
that,
and
that's
still
under
discussion,
I
mean
one
thing
is
for
sure:
you
know
we're
gonna
we're
gonna
continue
for
function,
we're
going
to
continue
that
same
kind
of
direction
in
terms
of
consistency,
because
it
will
building
up
some
expertise
and
knowledge
in
the
community,
and
we
want
to
continue
to
to
capitalize
on
that
and
give
people
a
additional
chance
to
continue,
and
you
know,
quarter
million
dollars
is
not
enough
for
that
to
really
satisfy
this
specific
challenge.
A
I
I
want
to
hear
your
feedback
about
how
to
how
we
can
improve
it,
and
we
still
have
some
time
to
do
some
iterations
around
that
because
we
haven't
announced
it
yet.
So
you
know
how
to
do
that.
You
know.
A
Maybe
let's
have
a
discussion
about
it
next
week
in
the
town
hall,
we'll
dedicate
some
time
and
you
know
bring
bring
yourself
or
you
know,
maybe
publish
an
opinion
piece
on
on
one
of
the
chat
channels
and
tag
tag
me
and
anna
and
and
and
we'll
try
to
give
you
a
stage
on
the
in
the
town
hall
to
have
a
discussion
about
it.
A
I
think
it's,
I
think
it's
a
great
to
to
learn
from
you
all
how
you,
what
your
thoughts
about
the
challenge
and
how
it
can
be
better
and
it
will
try
to
work
up
work
on
it.
You
know
the
things
for
sure
it's
like
for
fund
four,
it
will
be,
you
will
decide
it
all.
You
know
it's
not
it's
not
gonna,
be
moderated
by
by
me
or
by
the
catalyst
team.
A
No,
it's
not
coming
soon.
We
want
it.
It
will
be
part
of
our
roadmap,
but
for
fun.
2
does
not
that
then
it's
not
gonna
happen,
and
for
and
for
future
funds.
We
need
to
put
it
in
our
put
it
in
allocated
in
our
roadmap.
But
you
know
we
we.
We
are
aware
that
we
need
to
support
it.
It's
important
that
that
people
can
vote
securely
with
the
hardware
wallets
more
more
announcements
about
that
in
the.
A
A
I
fill
in
the
feedback
last
week
and
could
enter
three
improvements.
I
could
have
given
more
than
three.
I
think
we
have
great
community
with
a
lot
of
knowledge,
which
makes
it
possible
to
leave
the
ecosystem
to
a
perfect
level
yeah.
Could
there
be
a
round
of
feedback
for
the
category
system
itself
to
make
it
the
best
in
the
world
nick
and
we're
not
there
to
spell
just
to
pronounce
your
last
name,
but
this
is
an
amazing
like
thank
you
for
this
comment.
A
Just
one
round
of
feedback:
how
about
like
a
lot
around
the
feedback,
so
we
tried
to
in
fanto.
I
think
we
already
sent
the
two
or
maybe
three
feedback
forms
and
we're
gonna
have
a
big
one
at
the
end
of
fund
two.
That
would
be
even
more
thorough
and
we
have
on
the
on
a
discount
there's,
like
a
type
of
challenge,
called
a.
A
A
So
you
know
we
have.
We
have
many
different
systems
in
play
for
for
the
feedback,
I
would
say
the
the
biggest
one
like
the
one
that
we
take
the
most
like
we
all
take
seriously,
but
the
one
we
give
the
most
the
highest
proportion
of
attention
is
the
one
at
the
end
of
the
fund
and
where
you
ask
to
to
rank
between
one
to
five
impact
feasibility.
A
So
this
is
like
kind
of
like
aligns
exactly
what
he
says
is
perfect,
that
we
strive
to
be
perfect
and
when
we're
asking
each
each
member
in
the
community
to
to
share
his
perspective
about
that,
and
then
we
take
all
this
data
and
we,
you
know,
we
find
common
themes
and
we
analyze
it,
and
we
crunch
it
down
into
some
a
short
list
of
priorities
that
we
know
we
can
deliver.
And
then
we
implement
it.
Rinse
and
repeat:.
A
A
There's
need
more
focused
attention
on
these
issues
and-
and
I
have
to
say,
you're,
absolutely
correct
and
I've
been
I've
been
planning
for
a
while
now
to
you
know,
to
to
spend
the
quality
day
to
work
with
all
of
them,
and
and
do
some
of
this
like
analysis
and
response,
it's
just
been
a
marathon
right
now
to
push
out
the
fun
to
governance
and
we're
going
to
try.
You
know
like
we're,
definitely
gonna
get
to
it
like
everything's.
That's
there
is
gonna,
be
read
and
considered
and
be
processed
mercy.
A
I
can
assure
you
we
just
we're
just
having
we
just
you
know.
We
got
lots
of
other
feedback
coming
our
way
and
also
a
lot
of
other
urgent
deliverables
that
we're
prioritizing.
But
that's
gonna,
be
that's
important.
A
A
A
You
would
actually
need
to
use
the
cli
tool,
so
it's
like
a
special
spo
tool
so
tune
in
next
week.
Thanks
you.
A
With
uroy
a
possibility,
well,
it's
a
possibility.
I
mean
I
mean
I
think
the
right
team
is
working
on
heading,
adding
registration,
maybe
even
voting
capability,
then
you're
right,
I'm
not
tracking
their
progress
currently,
but
I
think
I'm
pretty
sure
that
for
fun
too,
they
won't
be
ready,
but
hopefully
for
future
funds.
Definitely
it's
like
there's
work
going
on
there.
A
Okay,
so
when
you
mean
outlying,
you
mean
like,
like
a
really
negative.
You
know
like
you
feel
like
if
the
feedback
you
received
on
your
proposal
is
like
it's
totally
unfair,
totally
unthoughtful,
you
know
something
you
want
to
flag.
If,
if
I
understand
correctly
so
that's
a
good
question,
I
mean
what
I
would.
What
I
would
suggest
you
for
you
to
do
is
copy
paste,
the
copy
paste.
A
A
You
know
kind
of
like
a
process
for
for
for
dealing
with
that
kind
of
like
flagged
feedback,
etc.
But
that
could
be
the
start.
It
could
be
a
prototype.
So
I
think
I
think
the
first
step
is
like
getting
all
sorts
of
requests
from
the
community
and
like
assessing
how
we
can
streamline
it
and
how
to
make
it
fair
and
transparent,
etc,
and
for
you,
sharing
that
with
us
for
fun
too
will
help
us
give
us
more
data,
so
we
can
make
like
we
can
create
a
process
for
this
in
funds3.
A
I
think
in
fund
two
we're
not
gonna
just
in
terms
of
just
like
the
amount
of
work
we
need
right
now
to
to
do
is
like
we
won't
be
able
to
address
it,
but
at
least
we
can
at
least
we
can
take
it
into
account
like
thinking
about
this,
the
assessment
process
going
forward
and.
A
And
I
think
that
you're,
you
know
and-
and
I
also
encourage
you
to
take-
take
that
take
that
critique.
You
have
the
the
the
critique
you
have
of
the
assessment
and
share
it
with
the
community.
So,
for
example,
you
can
on
the
comment
section
in
your
proposal,
you
can
write
a
response
to
to
the
feedback
and
you
can
also
there's
like
a
special
feature
called
annotate,
and
you
can
also
kind
of
attach
it
to
your
proposal
so
that
that
it
appears
for
people
who
look
at
their
proposal
like
they
can
see
it.
A
Your
your
reply
to
that
to
that
critic.
So
that's
like
another
another
option.
You
have
to
kind
of
protect
your
reputation.
You
know
I
can.
I
can
imagine,
like
you
know,
like
an
edge
case
like
someone
like
really
saying,
like
libelous
things
and
things
that
are,
you
know
blaming
you
of
corruption
and
you
you
want
to
respond
so
you
at
least
on
the
public
level.
You
have
you,
have
the
ability
to
respond
and
get
and
make
your
voice
heard.
You
know
through
the
id
scale
interface,
but
also
like
fingers
about
it.
A
A
A
Just
one
thing
is
that,
like
I
think
in
a
decade
like
I
see
that's
like
I
have,
I
see
a
comment
here
by
chris.
Patton
walker
says
door.
Yes,
I
have
updated
mine
with
comments
on
your
feedback.
This
is
not
my
feedback.
A
There
might
have
been
it
might
have
been
mistakenly
posted
from
my
account.
It
was
not
even
me.
It
was
probably
eric
that
posted
them,
but
in
the
future,
like
all
this
feedback
is
gonna,
be
sent
okay,
so
in
the
future.
So
that
was
that's
a
mistake
like
in
the.
A
A
A
A
A
Okay
about
I
mean
I
I
actually
it's
a
very
it's
a
different
team.
I
actually
don't
know
that
much,
I'm
not
that
well
informed
about
prison,
and
we
can
ask.
I
mean
I
think
it
will
be
cool
to
get
them
here
to
get
together
on
the
town
hall
and
talk
a
bit
about
potential
integrations
and
stuff
I'll
I'll
talk
with
them
about
it.
A
A
A
A
A
Oh,
my
god
yeah
I
mean
I'm
okay,
chris
I'm
sorry
I
I
did
not
say
that
I'm,
I'm
generally
like
I'm,
trying
very
explicitly
not
to
not
to
hold
opinions
on
on
proposals.
I
think
there
was
an
error
yeah.
There
was
an
error
by
one
of
the
staff
members
that
he
published
the
community
advisor
feedback
using
my
admin
account
and
that
led
to
this
misunderstanding,
I
have
actually
we
actually
learned
about
this
issue
and
he
was
the
staffer
was
instructed
to
delete
this
delete
this
and
repost
it.
A
But
you
know
what
what's.
The
essence
here
is
like
none
of
this
feedback
is
coming
from
me.
It's
just
we're
just
sending.
I
just
posted
this.
It's
just
like
a
posting
of
summary
from
community
advisors,
so
I
really
don't
take
it
personally
and
really
and
really
just
to
be
clarified.
I
will
never
I
never
take
like
a
you
know,
I'm
I'm
supposed
to
facilitate
the
process
and
and
to
be
able
to
successfully
facilitate
the
process.
I
need
to
be
neutral,
and
so
I
really
don't.
A
I
try
really
really
hard,
although,
like
you
know,
I'm
just
a
person
too
and
I
get
excited
and,
like
you
know,
obviously
have
my
own
favorites
and
stuff
like
I'm
trying
to
keep
it
to
myself,
and
I
hope
I
don't
sleep
up
or
like
subconsciously
share
that.
But
but
if
I
have
favorites,
but
I
really
work,
try
to
work
hard
not
to
not
to
do
that,
and
I'm
sorry
that
that
was
the
impression
that
was
created.
A
A
A
We
started
by
removing
the
blank
proposals
and
setting
a
standard
that
that
that
feedback
should
have
content
in
it
and
it
can
be
just
a
score
and
in
fact
we
will
continue
to
drill
down
and
and
refine
that
even
further
and
but
part
of
it
is
to
kind
of
highlight
like
unfair
and
thoughtful
comments
and
send
this
back
to
us.
So
we
can
analyze
it
and
figure
out
a
better
system
next
time,
all
right,
that's
it
for
me
for
today
and.