►
Description
Presentation slides: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1asDxNAabCbGvEzA0n29SgHqWNLvYAW91hu6FAe4ogZE/edit?usp=sharing
A
A
How's
everybody
doing
hope
you're
having
a
good
day.
Let
me
fire
up
the
the
slides
I
I
really
wanted.
I
really
wanted
to
to
keep
this
townhouse
short,
unfortunately,
today,
because
of
the
because
it's
all
about
assessments
and
community
advisors,
there's
like
a
lot
of
talk
about
so
let's
see
how
long
it
takes.
A
A
A
We're
seeing
now,
I
think,
I
think,
with
the
assessment
stage
we're
seeing
the
beauty
of
of
decentralized
collaboration
of
of
how
you
have
proposers
and
you
have
implementers
and
you
have
community
advisors,
and
you
have
voters
and
many
other
roles
that
we
didn't
find
a
name
for
yet
that
are
each
one
does
does
a
specific
job,
specific
thing
that
they're
asked
to
do,
but
together
it
forms
complex,
coordinated
behavior
that
is
beautiful
and
amazing
and
serves
everybody
like
some
similar
to
to
a
flock.
However
birds
it.
A
A
A
A
We
really
appreciate
you,
so
we
appreciate
you
for
being
serious
for
being
real
for
being
responsible
to
help
us
manage
the
the
attention
of
our
community
and
our
advisors
and
our
voters
only,
and
only
only
on
proposals
that
are
serious
and
willing
to
go
all
the
way.
So
you
know
thank
you
for
having
the
courage
to
do
that
and
for
being
a
responsible
part
of
our
community
and
we
see
like
basically,
you
can
really
see
that
we
pretty
much
doubled.
Our
numbers
essence
fund
two.
A
So
while
we
had
672
registered
community
advisors,
the
current
number
is
1272
registered
community
advisors,
with
registration
closing
in
one
hour,
basically
doubling
our
number
of
members
and
id
scale.
We
got
to
the
6
000
members.
Let's
I
know
it's
like
blows
my
mind.
I
just
like
it's
weird
to
say:
okay,
it's
like
there's
like
staggering
numbers
and
even
in
our
nonsense
announcement
telegram.
A
We
a
bit
more
than
double
the
numbers
of
of
people
that
are
really
tuning
in
and
just
keeping
track
of
everything
that's
going
on
and
if
you,
if
you
can
even
share
the
announcement
telegram
hyperlink
for
those
who
are
new,
this
is
a
great
place
to
to
get
notified
when
things
happen,
and
also
you
know,
as
you
know,
we
saw
this
week.
We
saw
pretty
substantial
rise
in
the
the
the
ada
evaluation
that
is
compared
to
the
dollar,
and
so
now
the
current
holdings
in
treasury
is
around
the
121
million
dollars.
A
A
Now
it's
time
for
members
of
our
community,
the
community
advisors,
to
go
and
review
the
proposals
they
have
one
week
to
do
so
and
after
that,
we're
adding
this.
Like
we're
doing
this
experimental
stage,
it's
called
like
the
assessing
assessment
so
reviewing
the
reviewers,
we're
basically
we're
giving
a
chance
for
proposers.
A
Or
it's
like
pretty
very
obvious
that
the
person
who
made
them
didn't
even
read
the
proposal,
basically
kind
of
a
quality
assurance.
Okay
and
a
chance
for
you
proposers
to
to
help
improve
the
process
and
have
more
fair
reviews
towards
you
and
all
those
all.
Those
reviews
that
will
be
flagged
are
actually
going
to
be
reviewed
by
veteran
community
advisors
and
will
not
be
part
of
the
final
assessment.
Okay.
So
we're
like
we're
leveling
up
our
our
defenses,
our
moats,
for
for
collective
intelligence,
raising
our
standards.
A
So
what
are
these
goals
of
community
advisors?
Pretty
simple,
make
improve
the
decision-making
capabilities
of
of
of
of
the
funds,
basically
improve
the
impact
of
what
is
generated,
the
roi
that
is
generated
by
giving
voters
advice
and
help
them
make
good
choices
about
which
which
proposals
we
should
prioritize
for
funding
at
this
coming
ground
and
the
second
and
equally
important
one
is
it's
about
helping
proposers
understand
how
to
improve.
A
We
are
building
a
community
of
proposers
and
we're
working
with
you
every
funding
on
every
funding
ground
to
improve
you
to
to
to
give
you
more
feedback
to
give
you
more
information
to
help
you
improve
as
being
proposers
and
to
nurture
you-
and
this
is
what
the
community
advisors
are
here
for
to
help
you
help
you
improve.
Not
not
just
the
they're,
not
just
they're,
not
gay
gatekeepers,
okay,
they're,
they're
advisors,
they're
helpers,.
A
And
I
think
for
for
you,
the
community
advisor,
I
want
to
say
that
you
get
what
you
ask
for
okay,
so
you
are
the
future
of
catalyst.
The
future
of
decision
making
is
in
your
hands
and
by
putting
this
core.
By
putting
this
rationale,
we
the
cardano
community,
we
define
what's
our
standards
and
we
define
and
we
send
a
strong
message
to
to
future
proposers
about
what
is
expected.
A
So
if
you
accept,
if
you
say
what
you
want,
you
know
like,
if
you
say
no
to
substandard
proposals
or
to
proposals
that
don't
fit
the
challenge
or
when
there's
lack
of
documentation
or
feasibility
or
seriousness,
then
you're
sending
a
strong
signal
for
future
proposers.
You
know
that
they're
not
gonna,
you
know
they're,
not
gonna
get
funded
if
they
do
it
like
that,
if
you
are
going
to
accept
that
then
you're
sending
the
exact
opposite
and
you'll
get
more
of
that.
A
Okay,
so
so,
really
think
when,
when
you're,
when
you're
looking
at
those
proposals,
it's
like
do
you
want
more
proposals
like
that.
You
know
made
in
that
mindset
made
in
that
level
of
proficiency
level
of
seriousness
level
of
innovation
or
you
don't
because
it
because
it's
really
you
know
it's
really
about
you
managing
to
articulate
what
do
we
want?
Okay,
what
do
we
want
for
this
for
this
treasury?
What
do
we
want
for
this
catalyst
to
to
be,
and
so
this
is
going
to
start
probably
today
in
a
few
hours
I
just
need
to.
A
We
need
to
modify
a
few
settings
in
id
scale
and
and
and
launch
this
we're
going
to
do
our
best
to
to
start
it
today
and
and
we'll
we'll.
Let
you
know
then,
once
once
we
start
the
advisor
we'll
have
one
week
to
submit
the
reviews
and
we're
also
going
to
turn
back
back
a
comments
back
on,
because
now
now
that
the
now
that
the
proposals
have
been
finalized,
it's
you
know
we're
changing
the
mindset.
A
It's
not
no
longer
it's
about
like
gathering
feedback
and
improving
the
proposal
and
like
making
sure
you
know
we
have
the
best
proposal
up
for
the
ballot,
but
now
it's
not
campaign
time.
Okay,
now
it's
time
for,
for
voters
to
come
and
and
ask
questions
to
proposers,
to
help
and
to
assist
them
to
make
the
best
decisions.
So
it's
more
like
so
the
comment
section
in
a
discourse.
It
now
becomes
more
like
a
q,
a
with
the
proposers
between
voters
and
proposers.
A
A
A
There's
always
a
chance
that
that
that
the
identity
will
be
revealed,
you
know
now
or
somewhere
down
the
line,
so
just
just
be
ready
for
this.
Okay,
we
cannot
guarantee
anonymity
so
far.
We
so
far.
We
we
managed
to
maintain
it,
and
I
don't
see
a
reason
why
we
won't
manage
to
maintain
it,
but
everything
can
happen.
Okay,
so
so
don't
like
you
know,
don't
put
anything,
don't
put
anything
in
there
in
the
in
the
reviews
that
will
compromise
you
or
something
like
that.
A
Okay,
and
also
note
that,
because
we're
still
in
an
experimental
note
mode,
we're
keeping
a
record
of
all
reviews
and
reviewers.
So
so
this
is
not
exposed
publicly,
but
over
time
as
we
we're
getting
the
funds,
you
know
we're
starting
to
prototype
an
early
reputation
system.
Okay,
so
we
can
see
at
some
point
we
will
be
able
to
look
forward,
look
look
backwards
at
the
specific
advisor
and
determine
okay.
Is
he
a
veteran
advisor
or
it's
just
like
created
an
account
just
for
this
round?
A
Does
he
have
a
record
of
high
quality
reviews
or
have
you
has
it
been
reported
multiple
times
for
low
standards?
Okay,
so
so,
while
we're
not
doing
anything
about
that,
this
reputation
system
for
now
we
have
planted
the
seed
and
we're
planning
the
infrastructure
for
it.
So
this
is
also
called
for
you
to
really
play
the
long
game.
Okay.
A
Maybe
your
work
won't
be
even
accounted
for.
You
really
need
to
read
this
and
get
into
the
details.
This
is
not
a
you
know.
This
is
not
like
being.
This
is
like
a
serious
matter
and
a
few
over
time
also
we're
gonna
create
more
and
more
like
training
modules
for
community
advisors
and
but
but
we're
starting
with
this
guide
and
so
take
it
seriously.
A
Secondly,
we
established
a
hub
in
case
there's
any
any
questions
or
clarifications,
or
you
want
to
improve
the
process
or
you
want
to
consult
your
fellow
advisors
as
you're,
trying
to
assess
something
and
any
sort
of
any
sort
of
ambiguity
for
you
as
a
community
advisor
and
support
join.
This
join
this
telegram
channel
and
we
have
veteran
veteran
community
advisors
there
to
to
assist
you
and
also
I'll,
be
hanging
out
there.
A
A
A
A
You
give
you
give
a
review
for
impact
for
feasibility
and
for
auditability,
so
each
one
of
those
needs
to
have
a
rationale
and
including
of
consider
your
considerations
if
you're,
not
including
your
considerations
in
rationale,
we're
gonna
flag,
you
and,
and
we're
going
to
remove
the
assessment
from
consideration
and
you
will
not
be
eligible
for
it
for
rewards
and
and
then
once
you
once,
you
articulate
your
considerations.
You
add
the
score,
a
numerical
score
in
a
ranking
of
one
to
five.
A
So,
let's
take
an
example,
one
of
one
of
our
challenges
is
the
dap
creation
challenge,
and
so
the
question
of
that
challenge
is
like
what
apps
should
we
build
to
drive
user
adoption
and
we
also
define
metrics
like
what's
the
ch?
What's
the
roi
for
this
return
intention
for
this
challenge
like
does
it
give
daily
active
users?
Would
they
would
this
dap
if
it
had
its
own
local
token,
like
its
own,
like
unique
token
like
how
much
activity
volume
would
they
have
basically
like?
A
A
Okay,
that's
pretty
obvious,
so
you
know
think
about
it
because
because
you
know
we
have
the
you
know
we
know.
What's
we
have
some
knowledge
about
what
technologies
are
currently
available,
which
ones
are
about
to
be
released,
which
ones
would
probably
take
longer
and
just
make
sure
that
the
proposer
is
is
actually
addressing
this,
that
they
have
a
plan
and
that
is
in
accordance
with
with
reality.
A
A
So
the
third
one
is
editability.
So
basically
you
know
from
reading
this
proposal
I
have,
I
have
as
an
advisor
enough
information
to
to
assess
it.
Okay,
so
is
there
clear
road
map
and
milestones
mentioned?
Is
that
there's
a
definition
of
success
is?
Is
there
a
clear
understanding
of
the
description
of
the
problem
and
the
solution
have
the
have
the
have?
The
proposer
discusses,
addresses,
challenges
and
risks
that
are
that
might
be
associated
with
project
you
know:
does
he
have
a
backup
plan.
A
Once
these
reviews
are
are
provided
and
at
the
end
of
this
week,
this
is
what's
going
to
happen,
so
we're
going
to
remove
all
the
blank
reviews
and
we're
going
to
give
the
proposers
and
general
community
a
chance
to
flag
a
substandard
review.
So
we
publish
this
some
kind
of
a
csv
that
people
can
can
can
flag
and
then
veteran
community
advisors
will
will
discuss
the
flag
reviews
and
and
recommend
whether
to
filter
them
out
or
not
include
them
or
not.
A
So
so,
like
it's
kind
of
some
kind
of
a
direct
direct
directing
the
attentions
of
voters,
then
we're
also
going
to
take
this
summary
like
like
we're
going
to
take
all
the
all
the
texts
that
advisors
gave
as
a
rationale
and
we're
going
to
attach
them
to
each
proposal
in
id
scale.
So
so,
there's
transparency
and
and
the
proposals
can
proposers,
can
read
and
learn
for
next
fund,
but
also
can
voters
can
can
get
their
own
sense
of
what
rationality
the
community
advisors
give
to
a
particular
proposal.
A
A
So
here's
how
the
model
is.
Okay,
so
let's
say
we.
Let's
say
we
have
two
proposals
and
one
proposal
got
four
reviews.
One
proposal
got
two
reviews,
and
now
we
start
a
lottery,
so
we're
gonna
choose
three
reviews
that
are
gonna,
that
that
will
become
that
would
win
a
reward
okay.
So
this
advisor
does
review
and
this
advisor's
review
and
this
advisor
with
you
they're
gonna
get
a
reward
and
you
know
we're
gonna,
send
them
some
ada
their
way.
A
This
person
review.
Number
two
is
out
of
luck.
You
know
is,
is
not
going
to
receive
a
reward.
Okay,
so
proposal
b
I
only
had
two
reviewers,
so
there's
no
lottery,
you
know
like
both
of
them
are
gonna
get
the
rewards.
If
they
had
three
reviews,
all
three
of
you
would
get
a
reward.
If
there
were
four
reviews,
then
three
out
of
four
would
get
a
reward.
If
there
was
twenty
thousand
reviews,
then
three
out
of
twenty
thousand
would
win
a
reward.
Okay.
A
A
We
had
a
few
people.
We
actually
had
a
few
people
in
front
too.
That
gave
lots
and
lots
of
reviews,
but
then
because
they
made
some
like
honest
mistake:
er
did
notice
some
element
of
the
ui.
You
know
they
left
one
blank
review
and
now
they're
you
know
now
they
became
because
of
that
they
became
non-eligible
and
they
didn't
receive
rewards.
A
A
A
The
person
was
not
serious
about
the
the
selection
criteria
and
the
guidelines,
the
articulation
about.
What's
the
rationale
of
why
this
why
this
score
was
given
was
not
clear,
it's
not
it's
not
clear
from
reading
it
like
what
you
know
why
you
gave
that
score.
Why
you
gave
one
one
star
or
five
stars
by
the
words
you
used
for
the
rationale.
A
A
A
A
A
For
your
for
your
proposers
for
defending
your
proposal-
and
you
know,
let's,
I
really
want
us
to
think
about
it.
This
is
this
is
a.
This
is
a
it's
a
collaboration
and
it's
important
to
be
to
keep
our
feedback
constructive
and
and
it's
and
it's
and
it's
for
voters,
it's
it's
good
for
collective
intelligence
for
you
to
express
on
a
descale
if
you
support
or
not
support
a
proposal,
but
try
to
be
constructive
about
it.
A
A
It's
also
a
place
for
people
to
share
resources
about
different
analytic
tools
and
different
methodologies
that
people
are
used
to
assess
proposals
in
a
good
way
and
read
the
guideline
once
you
do
these
two
things
you
can
log
into
it
like
and,
and
you
wait
a
few
hours
until
we
we
initiate
the
assessment
stage,
you
can
log
into
this
scale.
You
can
just
pick
the
proposals
you
want
to
review,
you
can
provide
thoughtful
and
you
provide
the
reviews.
You
provide
the
rationale
and.
A
And
yeah
and
we're
also
going
to
ping
you
at
some
point.
I
think
all
community
advisors
are
going
to
get
pink
to
ask
them
for
their
reward
address
like
where
they
want
incentives
to
be
sent
to
so
expect.
Something
like
that
to
happen
through
a
descale
through
an
email
from
us
or
through
a
pop-up
in
the
id
scale,
app
itself.
A
So
yeah,
that's
you
know.
I
have
about
20
minutes,
I'm
happy
to
address
questions.
So
I'm
going
to
look
at
the
at
the
list
of
questions
that
are
posted
here,
I'm
going
to
prioritize
those
that
are
related
directly
to
to
advisors
and
also
those
who
get
lots
of
votes.
So
so
you
know
make
sure
to
place
your
vote
on
questions
that
are
relevant
and
I'll.
Try
to
get
them
as
much
as
I.
A
A
A
A
A
A
But
right
now
it's
it's
like
really
easy
for
you
to
there's
like
a
specific
button
to
submit
the
rationale,
and
I
I
I
think,
last
time
you
know
we
had
some
people
like
fill
up
the
the
rationale
and
then
forget
forget
to
hit
submit
and
then
we
you
know,
then
what
we
see
in
our
end
is
a
blank
bank
review.
So
really
really
be
careful
about
it.
A
Do
all
proposals
receive
three
lottery
tickets
mauricio
asks
well
every
yeah
every
proposal
that
goes
gets
into
the
into
the
ballot.
We're
actually
right
now,
once
once
I'm
done
here,
we're
gonna.
Look,
we're
gonna,
see
all
withdrawal
proposals,
a
lot
of
proposals
that
have
it
doesn't
mention
how
much
dollar
in
aid
that
they
want
and
filter
them
out.
But
but
every
proposal
that's
like
passes
that
filtering
phase
and
we'll
have
three
lottery:
free
community
advisor
lottery
tickets
attached
to
it.
A
Randall
I
signed
up
to
be
a
community
advisor
before
the
crowdcast.
Will
this
take
a
bit
of
time
to
be
confirmed?
No,
it's
instant,
I
would
actually
say
like
if,
if
after
reading,
if
after
hearing
this
presentation
you're
excited
to
be
a
community
advisor,
I
think
you
can
still
make
it
in
until
I,
until
I
close
this
town
hall
and
and
set
that
off,
so
you
have
there's
a
few
minutes
window.
A
A
I
wouldn't
recommend
it.
I
think
I
would
really.
I
really
recommend
to
everybody
like
right
now.
The
funds
are,
the
fund,
amounts
are
pretty
low.
The
reward
amounts
are
pretty
low,
we're
just
starting
off
the
reputation
system,
much
better
to
play
the
long
day.
Much,
but
much
better
to
like
pick
like
two
proposer
proposals
that
you
really
you
know
you
have
some
domain
expertise
in
that
you
really
get
their.
You
know
the
world,
the
industry
or
whatever
they're
proposing,
and
you
really
give
a
really
high
quality
review,
and
you
know
it's
not
just
the
karma.
A
You
know
it's
also
going
to
be
like
down
the
line
and
we're
going
to
look
at
all
these
reviews
like
and-
and
there
will
be
some
kind
of
advisor
reputation
system
and
there
will
be
people-
you
know
again,
it's
not
it's
not
defined
yet,
but
the
the
data
that
we're
going
to
look
at
is
defined.
That
is
going
to
be
the
record
of
of
of
your
reviews
so
better.
I
think
now
the
best
strategies
is
focus
on
high
quality
reviews,
rather
than
a
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
reviews.
A
And
I
was
wondering
carlos
is
asking:
I
was
wondering
about
the
distribution
of
funds
from
the
treasury
to
projects
we
vote
on.
How
that?
How
does
that
process?
Look?
Is
it
written
in
the
code
or
does
someone
have
to
send
the
money
yeah?
So
currently
it's
a
it's
pretty
manual
process
where,
where
there
is
someone
that
sends
the
money
there
is
like
it's
like
an
internal
catalyst
process,
we
actually
have
quite
a
rigorous
process
of
you,
know
multiple
people.
A
Looking
at
looking
at
the
data
and
validating
that,
it's
okay
and
some
qa
process,
you
know
to
make
sure
we
don't
make
any
silly
mistakes
but
yeah,
but
it's
pretty
centralized
and
stay
tuned
for
the
rest
of
the
year.
They're
gonna
be
announcements
about
a
really
radical
cool
ways
that
this
this
this
process
is
going
to
be
decentralized
over
time,
but
but
now
we're
working
under
the
principle
of
safety.
A
Yes,
yes,
there
will
be
there's
gonna,
be
there's
gonna,
be
a
bunch
of
announcements,
we're
gonna
make
about
about
registration
for
for
fund
three
I
mean
I'm,
I
don't
wanna
make
a
promises
before
we
validate
them,
but
once
once
we
have
validation,
we're
gonna,
let
you
know
you
know.
All
I
can
say
is
that
now
is
that,
with
the
voting
app
we've
been,
you
know,
team
has
been
working
hard
and
we
added
the
whole
layer
of
multi-challenged
support.
A
A
A
My
well,
you
know
one
can
never
know
about
these
things,
because
just
the
crazy
nature
of
this
project
and
and
it's
rapid
pace
of
growth
and
as
understanding
and
realizing
things
as
we
do
experiments
like,
I
can't
commit
to
anything
like
long-term.
You
know
all
I
can
ever.
I
can
say
that
we're
going
to
keep
a
tab
on
it,
and
I
mean
I.
I
can
also
say
that.
A
A
That
is
that
id
skills
allows
us
and
gives
us
a
lot
of
comfort
and,
as
we
scale
up,
and
that
was
part
of
the
reasons
where
we
started
from
them.
So
so
I
mean
I
guess
for
me,
I
mean
not
only
that
you
know
I
I
can
actually
just
share
with
you
guys
that
a
few
weeks
ago
you
you
know,
we
received
a
lot
of
of
of
of
community
feedback
about
like,
for
example,
the
comment
section
in
id
scale
being
like
awkward
and
hard
to
navigate
like
take
taking
mini.
A
So
I
think,
by
the
time,
funds3
governance
is
going
to
start
you're,
going
to
see
a
you're
going
to
see
an
improved
commenting
capability
in
a
d
scale,
and
this
is
one
of
many
features
that
are
gonna
added
to
the
system,
based
on
your
based
on
your
feedback.
So
you
know
like
so
far.
This
can
really
prove
themselves
to
be
not
just
not
just
a
service
supplier
but
like
a
partner
and
and
and
they've
been
really
addressing
seriously.
A
Not
only
are
requests,
but
I
think
they're
actually
actually
going
to
be
become
a
proposers
for
future
catalyst
funds.
So
so
I
think
you
can
you.
Can
you
can
even
imagine
that
you
know
they
can
work?
They
will
work
together
with
the
community
to
to
bring
proposals
to
enhance
them.
So
I
think
they're
a
really
good
choice.
I'm
really
happy
with
the
choice
we
made
with
them.
I
think
there's
obviously
some
things
this
can
be
improved,
but
but
that's
that's
the,
but
but
there's
no
perfect.
A
A
A
We
will
make
available
some
kind
of
know
some
kind
of
of
of
of
tax,
consulting
resources
available
for
them,
so
so
they
can
make
the
most
out
of
the
funds
they
receive,
and
that
would
be,
I
hope,
hopefully
we
can
implement
it
even
for
the
phantom
cohort,
but
you
know
it's
definitely
something
we'll
do
for
the
fund.
Three
cohorts.
A
A
A
A
I
mean
you
know
some,
you
know
it's
like
it's
like.
I
sense
a
bit
of
a
disappointment
with
mccann.
Maybe
from
your
your
comments,
I
don't
know
I
I
I'm
not
that
aware.
What's
what's
going
on
with
mccann-
and
I
can
I
can,
I
can
only
assume
people
are
handling
things
in
the
best
best
professional
capacity.
A
A
And
then
you
know
the
treasurer
would
have
a
certain
budget
to
find
proposers
that
are
directly
involved
with
marketing
and
you
know-
and
we
can
do
it
in
our
way
in
a
decentralized
way
so
go
for
it.
You
know
if
you
feel
strongly
about
it,
go
for
it
for
fun.
Four
make
make
this
proposal
and
or
maybe
there
is
even
a
maybe
one
of
the
community
choice.
Challenges
are
already
covering
some
aspects,
so
maybe
you
should
just
like
vote
or
campaign
for
that
to
be
selected
as
a
challenge
for
fund
five.
A
A
A
A
Okay,
I
have
one
more
minute
door.
Chris
is
asking
door.
Do
you
have
any
suggestions
as
to
where
to
find
team
members
for
your
proposal?
Yes,
I
have
any
suggestions.
We
have
a.
We
have
a
a
team
from
the
community
who
set
up
a
discord,
server
and
anna
if
you're
there.
Maybe
you
can
post
here
in
the
comments
like
a
link
to
that.
A
So
on
this
discord
server
we
have-
I
don't
know.
Probably
by
now
we
were
probably
around
four
to
five
hundred
super
dedicated
members
and
and
there's
like
a
few
dedicated
channels
for
people
to
to
find
team
members
like
a
matchmaking
service
there.
So
this
is
like
a
great
place
to
find
to
find
team
members.
A
Okay:
okay,
I'm
tired,
okay,
I'm
gonna,
okay,
there's
one
more
question,
because
it's
hard
for
me
to
talk
one
hour
in
a
row:
okay,
quasar's
end
is
asking
questions:
can
we
insert
a
more
thorough
tagging
system
and
also
encourage
stronger
peer
review
style
advising
earlier
in
the
initial
submission
of
each
campaign?
Challenge
we
can
we
can
it's
possible?
The
I
think.
A
Let's
see,
I
mean,
there's
two
questions
like
the
tagging
system,
so
we
did
a
few.
We
did
a
few
tryouts
for
set
with
different
tag
systems.
I
think
in
fund
one
and
early
fund.
Two-
and
you
know
it
was
kind
of
like
a
bottom
up
tagging
system
and
then
everybody
just
like
kind
of
tagged
whatever
and
it
was
pretty
chaotic.
It
was
very
hard
to
manage
and
then
we
just
decided
to
be
to
make
it
more
focused
on
finding
teammates.
A
I
guess
I
guess
the
question
you
know
I
I
I
think
it's
it's
more
like
you
know
what
do
we
have
to
gain
with
adding
more
complexity
there?
If
it's
worthwhile,
I
mean
our
team
is
pretty
open
for
it.
I
think
that
you
know
at
some
points
all
these
decisions
will
be
pretty
much
up
to
the
community,
but
until
we
get
there
like,
I
think
just
writing
a
thoughtful
article
about
about
this
point
like
why
we
should
do
it.
A
What's
the
benefits,
you
know
what
what
specific
tags
you
want
to
be
included
in
that
in
the
taxonomy
of
it,
and
you
know
the
more
you
give
us
stuff
to
work
with
and
address,
then
we
can.
We
can
address
a
stronger
peer
review.
Okay,
there
was
also
a
question
about
stronger
peer
review
style
earlier.
A
A
A
A
A
A
Lots
of
gratitude
for
all
the
veteran
community
advisors
who
are
helping
to
shape
the
process
and
taking
taking
leadership
in
it,
and
good
luck
to
all
proposers
that
are
gonna
start
to
campaign
and
get
get
the
support
and
and
yeah
and
let's
take
be
nice
and
awesome
with
each
other,
we're
doing
great.
Take
care.