►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
Okay
and
let's
get
started
so
welcome
to
welcome
to
our
sixth
town
hall,
this
is
a
very
very
exciting
week
and
so
so
for
all
newcomers.
I
want
to
welcome
you
to
the
experiment
we
are.
You
know
I
don't
know
collaboration,
not
decentralized
governance.
A
A
A
A
So
what
we're
here
as
to
provide
you
as
the
catalyst
team,
is
to
give
you
a
safe
environment
for
you
to
explore
the
highest
potential
of
human
collaboration
to
to
innovate,
to
innovate,
to
to
to
try
new
things
and
and
to
allow
yourself
to
really
fulfill
your
your
potential
and
see
if
it's
a
good
fit.
A
So,
let's
start
with
looking
backwards
at
the
week.
That
was
so.
This
was
a
finalized
stage
relatively
quiet
time
in
the
you
know,
on
our
on
our
different
platforms,
but
I'm
sure
that
for
all
the
proposing
teams
this
was
very
very
busy
time.
A
I'm
sure
there
was
like
lots
of
discussions
and
a
lot
of
writing
and
lots
of
editing
and
team
building,
and
you
know
I
just
want
to
first
and
foremost
like
thank
all
the
all
the
proposers
that
that
come
and
put
all
their
time
and
energy.
We
really
appreciate
you,
you
are
the
you're,
the
fuel
you're,
the
energy
that
drives
this
forward,
you're,
the
ones
who
are
bringing
the
impact
you
are
the
you
are
the
true
leaders
of
this
project.
So
you
know
I
just
want
to
give
you
a
lot
of.
A
Thank
thank
you
and
gratitude
for
all
the
hard
work
you've
been
you've
been
doing,
and
one
one
really
interesting,
and
I
think
so
very
positive
and
encouraging
thing
is
we
saw
this
week.
We
saw
11
proposals
with
withdrawn
and
I
think
there
were
maybe
15
or
16
that
were
withdrawn
even
a
week
before
so
so,
while
we
started
with
around,
I
think,
like
125
proposals
on
the
ballot
or
something
like
that
or
around
120.
Now
we
already
already
down
to
96.,
and
that's
that's
amazing
news.
A
You
know
no
need
for
a
blockchain
rules,
just
just
being
us
being
awesome
like
a
lot
of
people
are,
are
you
know
giving
kind
of
like
moving
away
from
the
stage
and
and
and
allowing
us
as
a
community
to
focus
on
these
96
proposals?
So
I
I
really
like
ev
every
proposal,
that's
withdrawn.
I
I
really
appreciate
what
you
did.
This
is
a
real
proof
of
of
accountability
and
responsibility
and
collaboration.
A
A
You
know
on
the
sidebar
and
this
filters
like
the
archive
tab,
you
can
click
on
it
and
you
can
see
all
the
people
that
their
proposals
were
recently
archived
and
these
these
were
people
who
who
withdrew,
and
I
think-
and
I
think
they
deserve,
like
you-
know-
a
clap
and
a
pat
on
the
back,
because
because
this
is
exactly
the
intent
of
the
innovation
phase,
the
intent
was
to
come,
get
feedback
and
learn
if
you're
ready,
not
ready
to
to
propose
and
and-
and
that
is
the
proof
people
who
withdrew
the
real
proof
that
they've
been
they've
been
like
listening
and
and
means
they're,
basically
like
serious,
serious
people,
serious
proposers,
good
collaborators.
A
A
Like,
first
of
all,
I
hope
that
in
in
funds
to
come,
we
will
see
more
more
of
this
type
of
activity
or
or
maybe
some
of
some
proposals
were
married.
Without
my
my
knowledge
and
and
if
that's
the
case
also,
let
us
know-
because
I
want
to
celebrate
that,
because
that's
exactly
the
purpose
of
this,
that
was
the
purpose
of
the
innovation
phase.
A
People
discovering
each
other
people
collaborating
people
finding
ways
to
to
to
converge
and
form
synergies.
So
thank
you
so
much.
We
had
a
lot
of
edits
and
I
couldn't
get.
I
couldn't
get
the
number,
but
there
were
a
lot
so
a
lot
of
activity.
I
think
you
can
see
right
now
on
the
ballot
like
the
quality
of
proposals.
Is
that
is
vastly
improved,
there's
much
more
detail,
so
really
good
job
everybody.
This
is.
This
is
amazing,
work
in
terms
of
community
advisors.
A
We
have
a
whopping
673
people
registers
to
be
community
advisors,
so
you
know
last
week
I
I
mentioned
that
we're
the
largest,
let's
say,
decentralized
innovation
organization
in
in
the
world.
Currently
we
almost
double
the
the
number
of
the
the
second
dow
in
this.
In
this
list,
but
in
terms
of
amount
of
advisors
amount
of
consultants-
I
mean
we
are,
you
know,
probably
a
hundred
x
more
than
any
any
other,
any
other
dao
that
that
in
existence.
A
This
is
the
best.
So
if
you,
if
you're
looking
for
this
kind
of
like
just
getting
the
essence
of
what's
going
on,
subscribe
to
the
announcement
telegram
and
study,
if
you
can
share
a
link,
I
know
I
didn't
share
it
here,
but
if
you
can't
would
be
nice
and
also
just
as
a
kind
of
a
fun
trivia,
the
amount
below
is
is
how
much
is
currently
in
the
treasury.
So
almost
13
million
dollars
worth
of
ada,
not
bad,
not
bad.
A
So,
let's
look
at
the
let's
look
at
where
we
are
so
we
we
finished
the
finalized
proposal,
phase
we're
now
entering
the
assess
stage
and
we're
going
to
talk
about
it
today
in
in
detail
what
it
means
just
one.
One
addition
that
is
happening
is
that
we're
adding,
after
the
assessment
stage
we're
adding
an
additional
stage.
So
this
is
news
and
it's
a
I
call
it
the
assessing
the
assessment
stage.
So
after
all,
the
assessments
will
be
will
be.
A
A
So
for
this
we're
taking
an
extra
week-
and
I
think
a
big
question
that
that
came
up
in
some
of
the
community
channels
is
what's
up
with
the
timing
that
you
know
we
were
supposed
to
start
voting
and
what's
going
on
with
that,
and-
and
the
answer
is
not
that
simple-
we
are
working
very
hard.
We
actually
have,
I
think,
four
different
four
four
different.
A
That
is,
that
is
reliable
and
it
takes
a
lot
of
effort
and
we're
all
we're
all
working
very
hard
to
do.
That
and-
and
I
hope
that
next
week,
we'll
have
a
bit
more
information
about
when,
when
exactly
can
we
estimate
this,
this
will
be
ready.
So
you
know.
Obviously
this
will
be
something
that's
like
in
a
matter
of
weeks,
but
we're
really
really
pushing
ourselves
to
to
deliver
it
as
fast
as
possible,
but
not
too
fast
is
to
make
it
is
to
make
this
process
unsafe
or
unsecure.
A
So,
let's
talk
about
the
assessed
stage
and
three
major
actions
are
going
to
happen
this
week,
so
first
of
all,
community
community
advisors
will
start
assessing.
So
if
you're
registered
as
a
community
advisor,
you
will
receive
an
email
instructions.
What
to
do
with
a
link
to
the
guideline,
a
link
to
a
descale
you
can
use
in
order
to
start
your
assessments,
the
advisors
will
have
one
week
to
submit
a
review.
So
you
can.
A
You
can
submit
many
reviews,
but
you
know
at
least
one
review
you-
and
this
is
the
timeline
and
another
interesting
thing
that's
going
to
happen
is
we're
turning
commenting
back
on
because
we
just
moved.
We
moved,
we
switched.
We
were
in
the
innovation
stage
right
and
with
phase
we
were,
we
used
to
be
all
about
helping
proposers
like
improve
their
proposal
and
refine
it
getting
it
ready
for
the
ballot.
A
With
this,
we're
we're
actually
we're
actually
turning
commenting
on
and
allowing
you
as
a
voter,
the
possibility
to
ask
ask
use,
use
the
id
skill
to
ask
questions
for
proposers
to
pose
questions,
and
also
just
have
a
you
know
straight
on
discussion
like
should
we
vote
on
it
or
shouldn't
we
vote
on
it,
and
this
is
where
we're
at
very
exciting.
A
So,
let's
talk
about.
Let's
talk
about
this
voter
discussion,
so
you
know
so
now,
or
at
least
I
would
say
in
about
two
hours
once
once
proposals
have
been
finalized.
We
are
moving
into
into
the
governance
phase,
we're
starting
to
campaign,
so
it
starts
to
be
now
now
it's
okay,
now
that
we
know
the
final
things
that
are
on
the
ballot,
exactly
how
much
ada
is
requested,
milestones,
etc.
A
Er
now
we
can
start
campaigning
now.
People
can
start
to
ask
for
support
for
their
help
for
for
support
for
from
voters,
and
this
is
like
this
is
like
really
exciting.
We
actually
never
quite
had
that
with
with
this
experiment
with
funds
before
we
had,
we
had
one
for
fund
one,
but
it
was
very
short
and
I'm
I'm
really
curious
to
see
how
how
it
will
go
down
and
what
kind
of
additional
community
systems
and
tools
will
be
provided
to
give
to
give
a
stage.
A
You
know
we
are
going
to
give
a
stage,
because
iohk
will
tweet
out
the
the
solution
segment
for
each
proposer
and
help
them
give
get
exposure,
but
you
know
I
think
this
is
just
this
is
just
to
start,
and
I
think
there's
and-
and
I
know
that
a
lot
of
people
are
going
on
podcasts
to
present
their
project.
A
Another
thing
another
thing
we're
doing
is:
we
are
turning
on
voting
on
comments
so
now
that
you
see
starting
today,
when
you
see
a
comment
on
id
scale,
you
will
have
the
option
to
vote
up
or
vote
down
on
it,
but
what
does
it
mean
like
so
voting
up
means
that
you
personally
think
that
this
has
been
a
constructive
comment.
A
So
this
comment,
you
know
is-
is
helpful
for
the
community
to
get
to
to
to
to
make
better
decisions
overall,
like
this
kind
of
a
thoughtful
comment
that
that
we,
that
you
would
like
to
have
to
see
more
of
comments
in
this
style
to
vote
down.
It
means
okay,
I'm
reading
this
comment
and
it's
it's
unconstructive.
A
I
wish
you
know.
I
wish
we
had
less
comments
like
that,
so
this
is.
This
is
kind
of
a
way
as
we're
doing
this,
these
discussions
to
see
to
to
encourage
a
constructive
behavior
and
your
ability
to
influence
it.
So
please
use
it
use
it
wisely.
A
So
for
the
rest
of
the
for
the
rest
of
the
town
hall,
I'm
going
to
talk
about
the
community
advisors
and
what
they're
doing
and
how
they're
incentivized
exactly
so
bear
with
me.
So,
first
of
all,
why
are
we
having
community
advisors
for
two
reasons?
One
is
we
want
to.
We
want
to
help
voters,
so
we
want
to
help
our
let's
say:
community,
brain
okay
or
the
the
opinions
to
be
that
the
fund
is
making
about
which
proposals
to
fund
to
to
be
impactful
choices
and
informed
choices,
and
the
community
advisors.
A
Are
your
friends
they're
here
to
here
to
help
here
to
advise
you
and
obviously
you
know,
reading
and
96
proposals,
and
each
proposal
can
be
very
dense
and
and
complex.
You
know
it's
impossible
to
any
individual
unless
you're
like
really
really
dedicated,
so
the
community
advisors
gives
you
a
way
to.
A
You
know,
rely
a
bit
or
depend
a
bit
on
advice
of
someone
who
who
went
ahead
and
did
the
more
detailed
review
it's
important
to
emphasize
that
this
is
just
a
device.
This
is
not
a
verdict
and
in
the
end,
you
know
like
it's
important,
to
understand
that
community
advisors
were
you
know,
just
people
who
volunteered
to
to
do
so.
A
You
know
some
of
them.
We
know
some
of
them.
We
don't
know
some
of
them.
We
can
know
there
by
some.
You
know
some
some.
We
cannot
validate,
that
their
bias
are
unbiased,
so
take
it
in
proportion.
It's
it's
an
it's
in
a
device,
it's
a
part
of
your
toolkit
as
a
voter
to
make
sense
of
things,
and
we
encourage
you
to
treat
it
like
this.
So
so
you
know
click
on
the.
So
once
as
a
voter,
you,
you
see
the
the
proposal
on
the
voting
app.
A
You
know,
click
on
the
click
on
the
proposal
in
id
scale.
Look
at
the
look
of
the
notes.
The
reviewers
have
made
look
look
at
their
articulation
of
of
why
they
they
decided
what
they
decided
and
look
at
the
comments
section
and
look
at
how
the
proposer
is
is
is
reacting
to
the
questions
from
the
audience.
A
This
is
something
we
discovered
in
fund,
one
that
you
know
that
didn't
work
out
exactly
as
planned,
like
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
proposals
in
fund,
one
either
didn't
get
didn't
get
a
review
or
didn't
get
enough
reviews,
or
the
reviews
did
not
have
enough,
didn't
give
them
enough
information
to
understand
how
how
they
improve
and
and
and
after
you
know,
working
hard
for
many
weeks
to
build
a
proposal,
a
proposal
and
taking
this
risk.
A
It's
it's
a
really
bad
experience
to
like,
like
basically
like
to
end
this
cycle
and
not
getting
any
feedback.
You
know-
and
I
know
you
as
an
individual-
would
probably
feel
the
same
if
you
were
in
the
shoes
of
the
proposer.
So
that's
really
important.
It's
really
important
both.
So
we
can
get
more
better
proposals
over
time
and
that
people
like
basically
evolve
and
learn
in
over
time,
and
we
have
more
impact.
It's
also
a
great
way
to
retain
and
motivate
our
proposals.
A
So,
even
if
even
if
a
person
didn't
get
voted
on,
at
least
at
least
he
has
some
concrete
understanding
of
what
he
can
improve
and
it
can
learn
and
grow
from
the
experience.
So,
let's,
let's
help
them
out
what
are
the
actions
that
are
required
from
you,
so
you
will
get
an
email,
so
check
your
email
and
it
will
include
a
link
to
a
descale
with
which
you
can
review
review
proposals
and
we
will
add
a
later
today,
a
form
field.
A
I
think
it
should
probably
pop
up
in
a
discord
once
you
open
it,
but
I'll
I'll,
confirm
and
I'll
confirm
that,
but
we
will
give
you
an
opportunity
to
add:
what's
the
payment
address
for
your
incentive,
your
ad
ada
address.
That's
the
only
address.
We
will
accept
an
address
that
can
accept
ada
and
you
will.
You
will
need
to
pick
which
proposals
to
review
we're
not
going
to
constrict
you
you're,
going
to
pick
whatever,
whichever
your
hearts
desire
and
those
proposals
that
you
pick
to
review,
you'll
prov.
A
We
ask
you
to
provide
a
thoughtful
and
fair
review
of
it
and
we
will
define
what's
the
first
volume
fair
review
later
in
the
town
hall
and
there
will
be
a
there
will
be
a
final
submission
of
the
review.
Basically
this
time
like
noon
next
wednesday
at
noon
pst.
So
now
it's
10,
22,
pst,
so
one
hour
and
and
40
in
the
future.
A
Now
each
proposal
for
each
proposal
we're
going
to
look
at
them
at
high
quality
reviews
and
out
of
the
set
of
high
quality
reviews,
three
will
be
selected
per
proposal
that
would
would
be
eligible
to
receive
the
advisor
rewards.
Okay,
so
I'm
gonna
explain
you
know
this
is
just
like
a
one-line
summary.
A
I'm
gonna
have
a
few
slides
to
explain
to
you
the
entire
mechanism,
so
don't
worry
we'll
get
back
to
it,
and
the
incentives,
like
the
timing
that
the
incentives
will
be
sent
will
be
sent
along
the
when
the
proposers
receive
their
rewards.
So
we're
gonna,
just
like
send
all
the
rewards
at
once
at
the
end
of
the
after
after
the
voting
has
been
tallied.
A
That
was
done
especially
for
us,
and
we
added
this
experimental
feature
that
enables
the
reviewers
to
be
anonymous.
But
you
know
we're
we're.
We
are
the
first
because,
because
it
is
especially
for
us
we're
the
first
lemmings
who
are
trying
this
feature,
and
I
can't
guarantee
that
it
would
be
100
work.
You
know,
maybe
someone
would
figure
out
a
way
to
hack
it.
Maybe
because
it's
a
third-party
application.
You
know,
I
don't
have
complete
control.
A
So
while
we
tried
our
best
and
did
some
testing
to
to
show
that
anonymity
is
maintained,
I
cannot
100
guarantee
it.
What
does
it
mean
to
you?
So
you
know
so
assume
that
you
know
try
to
assume
that
there
is
like
a
very
small
chance.
Your
identity
might
be
revealed,
so
you
know
just
be
taking
it
into
account
as
you're
making
choices
about
who
who
you
want
to
review,
etc.
Like
don't
and
yeah.
I
wish
I
wish
I
could.
I
could
100
guarantee,
but
you
know
this
is
still
fun
too.
A
A
You
are
going
to
provide
in
your
assessments,
and
so
that
means
you
know,
as
I
repeated
many
times
before,
you
know
we
have
these
three
assessment
criteria
that
ability
impact
and
feasibility.
A
So
if
you're
gonna,
if
you're
gonna,
give
like
auditability,
let's
say
like
a
score
like
a
four
that
you
agree
that
it's
that
that
it
has
enough
information,
but
you
don't
give
any
explanation
why
you've
given
the
score,
we
would
consider
this
review
as
unthoughtful
so
that
it
was
given
without
without
sufficient
thinking
without
sufficient
proof
that
you
actually
read
through
the
proposal
and
that
proposal
will
not
be
eligible
for
to
receive
not
only
this
pro.
A
Like
I
mean
you
will
not
be
eligible
to
receive
any
any
incentives
this
round,
if
you're
going
to
send
out
a
low
quality
proposal,
a
low
quality
review.
Sorry,
so
here's
some
examples.
So
let's
say
I
gave
a
disability
a
low
score,
so
I
can
write.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
a
long
explanation.
It
can
be
just
something
like
there's
no
explanation
on
milestones
in
the
proposal,
so
I
couldn't
really
assess
if
it's
impactful
or
feasible.
So
that
could
be
a
good
response.
A
A
This
is
why
I
gave
it
a
two
in
terms
of
impact.
Okay,
so
again
you
give
you
give
a
rationale.
What
exactly
is
your
consideration
and
and
lastly,
it's
about
like,
for
example,
with
feasibility-
let's
say
something
worked
like
that
something
is
very
feasible.
A
Another
thing
to
think
about
is
this
the
scale
the
review
scale,
so
you
know
a
lot
of
times
we
when
situations
are
alive,
where
we
ask
to
give
a
one
to
five
like
star
rating,
you
know
like
maybe
it's
for
uber
or
or
some
kind
of
other
app,
maybe
some
feedback
form,
but
here
it's
really
important
to
understand.
What's
the
meaning
of
each
each
number
each
score
and
that
we
have
a
shared
understanding.
Otherwise
you
know
otherwise
the
the
score
would
be
very
imprecise.
A
So
so
we
understand
that
we
are
asking
you
about
for
each
one
of
those
criteria
that
ability
impact
feasibility.
We
give
you
a
statement
and
so
for
irritability,
it's
something
like
you
know.
I
agree
that
I
I
you
know
this.
A
This
proposal
has
all
the
you
know
enough
information
in
it
to
for
me
to
assess
properly
and
then
you
give,
and
then
you
and
then
you
the
score
is
like
indicates
how
much
you
agree
or
disagree
with
that
with
the
statement
statement
that
was
provided
so
really
important
for
us
to
be
to
be
precise
and
have
talking
the
same
language.
A
So
let's
talk
about
each
one
of
these
criteria,
so
the
first
one
is
impacts
and
impact
in.
In
short,
it's
like
alignment
with
the
fun
challenge.
It's
alignment
with
the
return
or
intention
that
we
set
for
this
fund
so
and
the
challenge
is:
how
can
we
encourage
developers
and
entrepreneurs
to
build
gaps
and
businesses
on
top
of
cardano
in
the
next
six
months
found
roi?
A
We
we're
going
to
track
it
and
measure
it
simply
by
saying
how
many
developers
were
encouraged
to
build
on
candano
through
this
proposal,
how
many
entrepreneurs
were
encouraged
to
build
on
cardano
through
this
proposal?
So
this
is.
This
is
the
measurement,
and
this
is
the
impact,
so
try
to
see,
try
to
look
critically
at
the
proposal
and
see
like?
Is
it
aligned
with
our
intention
or
not
align
with
our
intention
and
then
it
would
reduce
the
the
impact
score.
A
A
Another
is
another
consideration
if,
if
there's
a
team
involved-
or
it's
just
like
individual
proposer,
because
if
it's
just
an
individual
individual
proposer,
it
means
that,
let's
say
something
happens
to
him
or
them
or
or
so
it's
very
can
be
very
fragile.
So
let's
say
if
there's
a
few
co-founders,
a
few
co-proposers
or
there's
like
a
strong
implementation
team
or
if
it's
a
company,
not
just
individual,
there's
less
risk.
Of
course
this
is
proportional
to
the
to
the
proposal.
A
There's
some
proposals
that
make
complete
sense
for
just
in
one
individual
to
do,
and
so
it's
up
to
you
to
to
use
your
to
use
your
judgment
here,
the
sec.
The
third
thing
is:
do
we
have
an
implementer
set
up
or
or
not
like?
A
Is
this
person
saying
yes
I'll,
get
the
money
and
I'll
hire
a
dev,
but
nobody
knows
who
this
dev
is
and
it's,
unlike,
not
sure
if,
if
this
person
is
along
or
not
or
it's
already
something
that's
like
secured,
you
already
convinced
someone
to
to
go
for
it
and
commit
very
important
indicator.
A
Fourth,
one
is
the
sensibility
of
the
plan
is:
is
there
a
plan
even
let's
serve
that,
but
is
it
sensible?
Is
the
budget
sensible
is
in
the
end?
It's
you
know
it.
In
the
end,
it's
like
looking
at
all
this
criteria
and
also
asking
a
bit
your
gut
after
after
taking
account
all
these
different
criteria.
A
A
You
know
it's
hard
to
understand
because
it
wasn't
written
well
and
it's
actually
hard
to
understand
what
what
what
was
the
what's
the
plan
and
the
impacts-
and
that's
also
here
your
duty
to
to
call
it
out
and
and
put
it
in
your
in
your
rating
and
so
in
general.
When
you
look
at
irritability
after
after
reading
a
proposal,
you
should
ask
yourself
did:
is
there
enough
sufficient
material
for
me
to
actually
look
at
the
feasibility
to
assess
the
feasibility
to
assess
the
impact
of
it?
A
A
So,
what's
going
to
happen
once
the
reviews
are
submitted
so
so,
first
of
all,
there
are
going
to
be
an
extra
week
where
we're
going
to
remove
unthoughtful,
unfair
proposal,
unfair
reviews,
but
then,
after
that,
we're
gonna
take
take
the
all
the
scores
that
were
given
for
the
proposal
and
average
them
out.
A
We
also
have
different
weight
weights
on
on
each
criteria.
So,
for
example,
impact
is
50
of
the
total
score,
so
so
we're
gonna
take
an
average
out
according
to
to
the
weight
and,
according
to
all
the
proposals
per
proposal,
it's
gonna.
It's
gonna,
show
up
in
the
voting
app
next
to
the
proposal.
Like
a
you
know,
simple,
like
one
to
five
stars
and
the
voters
can
sort
the
proposals.
A
One
option
to
start
proposals
is
through
their
review
score.
So
that's
one
impact.
A
second
one
is
the
the
written
explanations
you
provide
and
we're
going
we're
going
to
collect
all
the
written
explanation
and
we're
going
to
attach
them
to
each
proposal
in
in
id
scale.
So
as
a
voter
and
once
the
voting
begins.
For
example,
you
can
click
on
on
the
link
to
a
descale
from
the
voting
app,
and
you
can
read
the
rationale
behind
the
score
that
was
provided
and
not
just
you
know,
kind
of
like
blindly
believe
the
score.
A
So,
let's
talk
about
the
the
incentive
system,
so
this
is.
This
was
a
really
it's
always.
Incentives
are
always
really
complicated,
and
for
this
for
fun
too,
we
did
our
best
to
to
keep
them
actually
very
easy
and
understandable
and
and
somewhat
measurable,
that
we
can
measure
their
impact
if
it
worked
or
not.
A
A
We
wish
that
each
proposal
would
have
at
least
three
reviews,
and
you
know
just
to
balance
out
if
if
one
of
them
is
somewhat
not
fair,
you
know
at
least
there
will
be
like
an
aggregate
and
and
that
and
that
there
is
like
a
fair
coverage
of
all
proposals
that
just
because,
let's
say
proposals
in
the
early
stages
before
it
was
final.
I
didn't
get
enough
attention
from
the
community,
doesn't
mean
it
should
be
left
unreviewed,
and
so
that
was
important
and
the
second
one
was
really
really
discourage
unfair
and
unfortunate
reviews.
A
So
we
had
a
lot
of
reviews
in
fund
one
that
just
didn't
have
any
any
rationale
behind
it
and
and
that
that
went
counter
to
to
our
goals,
so
we're
trying
to
incentivize
that
or
this
on
this
incentivize,
the
opposite.
So
so,
how
does
this
incentive
work?
So
so,
let's
look.
Let's
take
a
look
at
two
proposals:
proposal:
a
and
proposal
b.
A
Okay,
in
proposal,
a
four
community
advisors-
decide
to
give
it
a
review
and
proposal
b,
only
two
community
advisors
and
decided
to
give
it
a
review.
So
we
are
rolling
the
dice
so
we'll
use
some
kind
of
a
randomization
mechanism
and
we're
gonna
pick
three
three
three
winning
reviews.
So
for
proposal
a
you
know,
review
one
review
three
review
four
were
were:
were
the
lucky
ones:
okay,
they
got.
They
got
picked
by
this
randomization
engine
and
they're
gonna
get
they're
gonna
receive
an
incentive
for
for
the
second
review
for
the
reviews.
A
The
second
reviewer
is
not
gonna.
Get
incentive
this
time,
but
but
you
know
you
know
it
happened.
They
did
have
a
lot
of
chance
to
win,
though
so
I
hopefully
he
maybe
made
multiple
reviews
and
to
increase
his
chances
for
proposal
b,
because
it
only
received
two
reviews
and
the
minimum
amount
was
the
the
amount
of
wizards
is
three
is
like
both
of
them
are
guaranteed
to
receive
an
incentive
without
any
need
for
randomization
all
right.
So.
A
A
You
know
like
kind
of
flagrantly
unfair
fragrantly
unthoughtful,
not
like
not
a
nuanced
approach
but,
like
you
know
it's
very
clear,
then
you
then
then
that
that
advisor
will
not
be
eligible
to
get
any
of
the
community
advisor
rewards,
so
they
will
even
not
even
be
part
of
the
of
the
lottery
they're
out
of
the
lottery
and
what
does
unfair
and
thoughtful
mean?
So
so
here
we're
trying
to
make
it
just
a
very
clear-cut
thing
case.
You
know,
so
it's
very
obvious
that
it's
like
this.
A
This
review
was
given
from
by
spiced
perspective
from
reading
the
review
text.
It's
clear
that
this
proposal
was
not
read
through
by
the
by
the
advisor
like
it
didn't
read
it
all
the
way
or
didn't,
read
it
at
all
that
it's
clear
from
the
wording
used
that
the
selection
criteria
or
guidelines
were
not
applied
or
understood
correctly,
and
also
that
there
is
a
lack
of
clear
articulation
of
the
rationale
for
the
assessment
in
a
constructive
way.
A
A
A
A
We
don't
have
the
we
didn't,
have
the
time
and
the
resources
to
structure
this
process
thoroughly,
so
so,
for
now,
it's
going
to
be
in
initially
some
kind
of
joint
effort
between
the
catalyst
team
and
community
advisors
to
do
it
and
we're
definitely
going
to
transparently
share
when
we
find
something
unfair
and
unthoughtful
and
share
their
rationale
and-
and
hopefully
from
that,
you
know
unperfect
process
that
we're
doing
now
we're
going
to
learn
how
to
do
it
in
a
more
decentralized
way
for
fund
three.
A
All
right,
so
the
million
dollar
questions
how
much
so?
How
much
will
I
get
so
the
total
nut,
so
the
amount
of
the
incentive
that
they're
going
to
give
be
given
out
was
five
percent
of
the
fund,
so
12
and
a
half
thousand
dollars
in
in
ada
and
the
reward
each
community
advisor
will
get
is
like
you,
you
know,
you'll
get
it
per
review,
that's
that's
wins
the
lottery
and
that
would
be
to
twelve
hundred
thousand
dollars
divided
by
the
total
number
of
of
winning
reviews.
A
So
the
maximum
amount
you
can
earn
would
be
twelve
and
a
half
thousand
dollars
worth
of
ada.
If,
if
you
manage
to
somehow
cheat
and
prevent
anybody
else
from
submitting
any
review
and
you're
the
only
person
who
had
an
eligible
review,
then
then
you're
great,
you
know
you
really
did
a
great
job
and
you
wanted
lots
of
money
if
but
the
minimum
amount
minimum
amount,
which
is
basically,
you
know
three
up
to
three.
So
three
reviews
per
like
assuming
that
all
the
winning
slots
would
be
filled
right.
A
A
What
about
the
chances
to
win?
So
if,
if
the
proposal,
you've
reviewed,
has
three
three
reviews
or
less
then
you're
guaranteed
to
win,
you
know,
don't
you
know
you're
not
in
the
lottery
you're
just
going
to
get.
A
A
Up,
okay,
I'm
gonna,
as
as
so
I'm
gonna
take
15
minutes
today,
I'm
going
to
finish
early
and
I'm
going
to
take
15
minutes
to
look
at
questions
and
answer
okay,
so
first
one
is:
when
voting
starts,
how
long
will
it
last
so
so
voting
will
start.
You
know
like
a
week
after
registration
is
ready.
The
voter
registration
is
is,
is
ready
and
people
registered
and
can
vote
and
we're
still
waiting
to
get
get
a
precise
estimate
about
when,
when
is
that
happening?
A
But
you
know
it's
a
matter
of
weeks
and
we'll,
let
you
know
as
as
soon
as
we
feel
confident
about
about
the
dates
and
about
the
length
of
the
voting.
A
Would
be
over
a
three
week
period
so
so
you
have
like
three
weeks.
You
know
once
you
register
to
vote.
You
have
three
weeks
to
to
decide
and
I
do
have
to
say
that
I
think
because
of
the
you
know,
because,
because
we're
having
delays
with
the
registration
and
we're
kind
of
like
already
now
starting
the
governance
stage
and
there's
like
more
time
now,
we
have
a
bit
more
time
for
for
debate
for
the
sake
of
efficiency.
We
might
shorten
the
devoting
the
the
length
of
voting.
A
So
we
can
start
fancy
earlier
and,
and
you
know,
continue-
continue
the
experiments
and
okay.
Nick
that
I
cannot.
I
will
not
there
spell
his
last
name
said:
can
you
explain
how
voting
will
work?
Is
it
that
the
whales
will
make
the
decision
or
how
it
it
is
set
to
be
qualified
to
vote
in
order
to
leave
the
trolls
out
of
the
system
and
when
trolls
are
removed,
can
they
come
back
and
try
again?
Okay,
there's
like
like
a
few
questions
here.
A
A
Once
registration
is
is
ready,
you
know
we're
going
to
have
a
whole
town
hall
just
about
that,
and
we're
going
to
really
go
into
details
exactly
how
you
exactly
how
you
register
and
all
the
actions
needed
and
like
give
you
like
an
on-screen
support
and,
like
you
know,
everything
possible
and,
and
when
voting
you
know,
and
we
also
explain-
we
will
also
explain
exactly
how
voting
would
work
with
with
screens
and
examples
and
like
dive,
demos,
etc.
A
A
First
of
all,
I'm
you
know
no
no
promises,
but
it
seems
like
for
fun
too
they're
going
to
be
some
mechanisms
in
place
or
or
lack
of
mechanisms
in
place
that
will
allow
that
that
will
not
allow
like
a
really
large
whales
to
participate.
So
at
least
for
fun
too
it's
gonna,
be
it's
gonna,
be
fun.
It's
gonna
be
a
smaller,
smaller
actors
that
will
that
will
be
able
to
vote
but
yeah.
But
of
course
like
in
the
future.
Your
voting
power
is
decided
by
how
much
tokens
you
are.
A
You
lock
like
how
much
stake
in
the
system,
so
so
probably
people
that
are
have
the
ability
and
desire
to
lock
more
more
ada
and
will
have
a
higher
influence,
and,
I
think,
there's
ways
for
smaller
actors
to
like
bend
together
and
like
form.
You
know
like
in
the
like
in
the
picture.
A
I've
I'm
showing
in
the
community
corner
like
to
band
together
and
become
a
whale
that's
made
of
smaller
actors
who
through
delegation
and
you
know
also
as
a
proposer
than
a
community
advisor
as
a
as
an
influencer
you're
gonna,
have
a
lot
of
you
know
you
could
you
could
convince
and
campaign,
and
for
that
the
community
would
will
make
the
best
decision.
So
there's
like
lots
of
different
ways
for
you
to
have
influence,
and
I
think
there
was
like
a
lot
one
more
part
in
this
question.
A
Something
about
trolls
but,
like
I
don't
know
it's
like
like
you're
saying,
are
like
when
trolls
are
removed,
can
they
come
back
and
try
again
it's
you
know.
I
think
it
really
depends
on
the
context.
I
think
in
the
end,
you
can't
prevent
a
troll
from
creating
a
new
identity
and
coming
back
and
trying
again,
but
we
will.
A
A
Violates
our
code
of
conduct,
you
know
they
will
get
a
warning
or
get
a
ban
depends
on
the
severity.
You
know
if
it's
just
like
a
person
that
is
like
you
disagree
with.
You
know
that
people
are
free
to
to
do
as
you
know,
do
as
they
wish,
and
the
main
instruction
is
like
to
ignore
trolls.
So
I
hope
that
answers
the.
A
Okay,
rob
is
robbie,
saying
there
are
found
one
proposals
unpopular.
Are
these
confusing?
Probably
can
we
update
the
proposal
to
say
here
here?
Is
the
fun2
version
url
yeah,
so
we
recently
added
the
we
modified
the
disk
interface
that
like
there's
like
a
top
bar
and
you
can
you
can
press
on
fund
one
fan
two
and
if
you
press
on
fan
two
then
then
all
the
filtering
will
only
show
you
fun
to
proposal.
So
that's
like
the
best
way
right
now
to
to
avoid
it.
A
A
Identification
area
like
it's
amazing,
I
I
read
it
often
and
I
track
it
and-
and
I
see
there's
like
a
lot
of
proposals
for
improvement
and
it's
more
that
we're
now
like
in
a
crazy
race
to
just
you
know,
give
you
the
entire
solution
and
before
kind
of
like
optimizing,
but
even
for
fun
too.
I'm
going
to
take
the
time
our
team
me
and
the
team
are
going
to
take
the
time
to
like
read
through
the
everybody's
comments
and
sort
and
wait
fight
a
long,
low
hanging
fruit,
implement
report
back
to
the
community.
A
A
Too,
will
voting
have
rewards
this
time?
Will
we
receive
documentations
and
steps
to
follow
for
voting
thanks?
Yes
and
yes,
and
there's
going
to
be
15
of
treasury
will
be
allocated
as
voter
rewards
and
there's
a
lot
of
documentation
exactly
how
this
this
happens.
But
we're
going
to
you
know
we're
going
to
have
a
a
future
town
hall
and
we're
really
going
to
cover
that
very
thoroughly.
Make
sure
that
everybody
understands
how
that.
A
A
A
So
I
mean
you
know
you
ask
them
to
create
a
as
an
accounting
id
scale
and
if
there's
any
problem,
creating
an
account,
a
ping
anna
ping,
the
team
or
or
work
with
a
discord
support
there
shouldn't
be
any
issue
to
create
an
account
and
yeah.
You
know,
I
think
I
think
it's
kind
of
like
a
general
thing.
You
know
if,
if
you,
if
you
care
enough
to
commit
to
a
proposal,
you
should
care
enough
to
go
and
fill
a
simple
form
that
takes
10
seconds
and
create
an
account
and
be
added.
A
So
I
I
understand,
if
I
understand
that,
maybe
there
was
a
mis
misunderstanding
about
about
how
important
that
is
that
I
think
you
know
you
still
have
one
hour
to
edit
your
proposal.
If
you
really
want
to
emphasize
that
you
have
a
long
team,
you
can,
you
can
add
it
to
the
you
can
add
it
to
the
proposal.
Just
mention
like
okay:
we
have
these
four
committed
people
here
are
their
names.
This
is
the
roles
they're
going
to
play
and
that's
fine.
A
You
know
if
you
can't
like
scramble
and
get
out
of
them,
to
join
and
adam's
co-proposals,
etc,
and
but
I
think
it's
important
it's
important
to
to
mention
which
people
are
your
team.
It's
a
very
strong,
it's
it's
for
you!
It's
a
strong
indicator
about
the
feasibility
of
your
proposal.
Like
you
know,
use
use
the
advantages
you
have
and
bring
it
bring
them
to
the
surface.
A
A
I
think
one
problem
is
that
one
problem
about
it
is
that
you
know
just
because
there
are
existing
reviews
doesn't
mean
they're,
not
gonna,
be
more
reviews
after
you
submit
your
review.
A
You
know,
and
I
would
suspect
that
a
lot
of
people
are
going
to
submit
their
as
usual
when
you
give
a
deadline
that
a
lot
of
reviews
are
going
to
be
given
a
second,
and
so
I
would
advise.
I
would
advise
for
community
advisors
that
want
to
optimize
their
chance
to
receive.
Rewards
is
like
look
at
look
at
the
list
of
proposals
and
try
to
try
to
assess,
like
you
know,
which
which
proposal,
I
think,
is
not
going
to
be
get
a
lot
of
reviews.
A
You
know,
take
your
best
guess
and
I
think
another
thing
you
can
do
is
like
you
know
you
have
all
these
channels
like
there's
like
there's,
there's
a
whole
discord
channel
that
that
I
don't
know
if
he
was
around,
but
you
know
if
we
can
open
if
there's
a
channel.
Probably
there's
already
a
channel
but
like
open
a
channel
for
community
advisors
and
you
can
actually
talk
and
coordinate.
A
A
A
How
do
you
draw
the
line
between
an
honest,
maybe
unconsciously,
biased,
review
and
a
biased
review,
and
so
we're
going
to
try
to
draw
the
line
in
very
rough
like
for
this
time
we're
going
to
make
a
very
rough
drawing?
So
you
know
if,
if
it's
really
demonstrated
in
the
text,
you
know
that
the
person
really
didn't
read
the
proposal
and
that
it
just
ignores
the
the
facts.
If
it's
like
extremely
obvious,
you
know
that
we're
gonna
raise
it
we're
gonna
flag,
it
we're
gonna,
raise
it
for
the
community.
A
You
know
we're
gonna
have
a
short
discussion.
I
think
that
if
something
is
like
it's
unclear
or
there's
like
diverging
opinions
in
our
staff
or
it's
a
bit
more
complex
and
we're
in
the
gray
zone,
I
think
we're
not
going
to
make
the
judgment
for
fun
fun
too.
Until
we
learn
more
and
I
think
over
time,
we're
going
to
have
we're
going
to
learn.
A
You
know
we're
going
to
have
all
these
edge
cases,
and
you
know
we're
going
to
talk
about
them
with
the
community
and
and
we're
probably
going
to
have
better
better
criteria,
better
guidelines
going
to
be
smarter
over
time.
I
think
so,
and
I
think
the
second
quest
part
of
your
question
is
also
very
interesting,
since
this
is
obviously
not
a
long
time
solution.
A
A
So
I
would
say
if
I
had
a
magic
wand
like
a
magic
logistical
one,
then
we
can
do
everything
perfect.
You
know
for
fun
too,
and
we
will
do
it
for
fun
through
and
onwards,
and
we
would
really
have
a
system
that
kind
of
like
random.
You
know
that
that,
for
that
people
can
flag
a
can
identify
a
problematic
review,
you
can
flag
it
and
then
it's
going
to
be
like
randomly
assigned
to
other
reviewers
in
the
community
and
they're
going
to
give
a
review
of
of
their
review.
A
You
know
and
then
there's
like
an
incentive
system,
that's
designed
for
the
reviewers
of
the
review
to
encourage
it,
and
maybe
some
rewards
so
people
who
find
you
know-
and
you
know-
and
people
who
who
who
manage
to
track
down
like
unfair
reviews
and
also
a
system
that
that
can
punish,
let's
say
people
who
are
reporting
misreporting
a
review.
You
know
this.
Can
this
could
be
like
a
lot
of
mechanisms?
A
Okay,
I
think
that's
that's
for
me
right
now,
and
so
I'm
gonna
go
go
configurate.
This
scale
be
prepared
for
the
assessment
stage
work
with
anna
and
I
hope
you're
all
excited,
and
I
think
I
don't
know.
I
think
it's
incredible
like
the
fact
that
we
have
so
many
so
many
community
reviewers
and
so
many
high
quality
proposals.
A
It's
amazing!
So
really
really
thank
you
everybody
for
for
this
week
and
I
think
it's
going
to
be
very,
very
interesting
to
see
what
comes
up
after
this
week
and
and
all
the
stuff
we're
going
to
to
learn
from
this
experiment,
and
oh
one,
one
more
thing
next
week
we're
going
to
have
a
surprise
experiment.
So
I'm
not
going
to
tell
you
what
it
is,
but
next
week
like
we're,
gonna
use
this
extra
week
to
its
fullest
potential,
so
look
forward
for
a
fun
fun
announcement
next
week.
Thank
you.