►
Description
Presented slides: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1DQIXXW196I8QOJDNMt_GtP0O3CYDS6Fk1Yg4b2FvzyA/edit#slide=id.gb55b0398fc_0_0
Fund 3 first townhall: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjPhxXDFv58
Telegram announcement channel: https://t.me/cardanocatalyst
Telegram chat group: https://t.me/ProjectCatalystChat
Discord: https://discord.gg/aKcVQgM
Dashboard: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15R-Vbajy4t4fGs1TipNMfL1pEO9cwdn6WV13lKviX4Q/edit#gid=755717523
Track goals and proposals: https://thecardanofund.com/
Project Catalyst Challenge and Proposal Guide: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1DQIXXW196I8QOJDNMt_GtP0O3CYDS6Fk1Yg4b2FvzyA/edit?usp=sharing
Submit your proposal: https://cardano.ideascale.com/a/index
A
A
A
A
So,
what's
our
goal
so
we're
here
to
provide
you
a
safe
and
a
lively
environment
for
you
to
explore
the
highest
potential
of
human
collaboration
and
on
the
picture
on
the
right,
you
see
that
with
some
kind
of
a
science
experiment
where
they
launched
5000
rockets
at
once.
So
that's
what
you
see
here
in
this
image
so
which
is
kind
of
what
we're
doing
so.
A
Instead
of
launching
5000
rockets,
we've
been
launching
12
rockets
this
time,
but
we're
going
to
get
to
a
place
where
we're
going
to
launch
5000
rockets
at
some
point
in
time.
I
don't
know
if
in
2021,
but
not
that
far
in
the
horizon,
this
is
gonna
happen.
The
the
big
shift.
Okay,
the
the
new
paradigm,
a
new
mode
of
collaboration
and
a
way
of
an
innovation
is
ramping
up,
so
launching
12
12
project
is,
is
an
incredible
fit
and
it's
just
the
beginning.
A
And
on
that
note,
I
really
want
to
thank
everyone
that
participated
in
fun
too.
I
mean
another.
Thank
you
like
I
don't
know,
just
just
express
collectively
we
did
the
we
did
something
incredible.
We
did
a
huge
achievement
and
a
lot
of
times
when
you,
you
know
you
leave
it
through
the
even
for
me,
like
you,
know,
leaving
it
through
every
day.
You
feel
all
the
all
the
edges,
all
the
all
the
friction,
all
the
small
issues,
but
let's
not
take
let's,
let's
not
forget
the
big
picture
of
of
the
actual
achievement.
A
Let's
not
forget
that
we
had
almost
2
000
people
around
100
community
advisors,
almost
a
hundred
proposing
teams,
thousands
and
thousands
of
participants
and
feedback,
and
and
we
we
produce
something.
That's
really
that
looks
really
great.
We,
we
managed
to
collectively
create
a
basically
a
cohort,
a
batch
of
a
batch
of
people,
and
I
think
I
think
the
community
made
a
really
great
made
really
great
choices,
and-
and
this
is
a
this-
is
an
amazing
fit.
A
Don't
forget
that
and
I
want
to
also
specifically,
I
want
to
address
proposers
who
didn't
get
funding
this
round
and
also
maybe
some
voters
that
were
disappointed
and
and
and-
and
I
think
everybody
everybody-
I
would
say,
like
everybody
in
this
community-
that
that
still
finding
his
place,
okay,
finding
his
place
in
his
ecosystem
still
trying
to
to
decide
like
am
I
a
proposer.
Am
I
am
advisor?
Am
I
a
voter,
and
I'm
am
I
an
implementer?
A
A
Just
notice
how
it
feels
all
right
now,
let's
move
on,
let's
talk
about
the
voting
results,
so
quick,
quick
analysis.
I
think
I've
seen
like
a
lot
of.
We
already
have
a
lot
of
analysis
going
on
in
the
in
the
telegram
chat,
and
I
think
it's
really
great
and
we're
gonna
get
more
and
more
more
analysis.
You
know
now
this
is
really
fresh
off
the
press.
A
A
Secondly,
I
it
seems
the
results
are
fairly
aligned
with
what
the
community
advisors
were
giving
and
it's
actually
not
too
aligned,
which
is
good.
So
I
I
think
we
found
a
really
great
balance
between
taking
the
advice
and
also
realizing
that
it's
just
an
advice.
It's
not
it's,
not
a
directive,
but
it
has
a
lot
of.
It,
has
a
lot
of
power
and
influence,
but
doesn't
have
absolute
power,
so
I
think
good
balance
there.
A
I
also
noticed
that
really
a
lot
of
people
that
have
a
track
record,
delivering
stuff
and
did
really
well.
So
you
know
the
obviously
the
first,
the
first
proposal
made
by
sebastian,
you
know
just
got,
I
don't
know
if
we're
ever
going
to
see
in
cattle
is
such
a
such
a
one-sided
vote.
Such
a
one-sided
vote?
Yes-
and
I
think
I
think
you
know
the
track
record
of
of
sebastian-
is
like
such
a
huge
part
of
it.
A
I
think
I
think
the
same
time.
I
think
the
same
thing
can
be
said
about
the
the
the
pull
tool
platform
upgrade,
so
it
actually
didn't
get
much
of
a
that
much
of
a
high
ranking
in
from
the
community
advisors,
but
I
think
when
people
deliver
and
when
people
bring
outcomes
and
people
bring
results
and
they
gain
the
trust
of
the
community
and
and
and
it
and
and
they
gain
power.
Okay,
and
I
think
this
is
a
great
thing.
A
A
A
And
another
thing
I
wanted
to
point
out
that
the
cardano
starter
kits
api
was
basically
a
merged
proposal.
I
think
it
was
two
maybe
even
three
proposals
that
just
thought
they
were
aligned
and
and
merged
their
their
proposal
as
it
was
advancing
through
the
fund
to
innovation
into
one
proposal,
and
you
can
see
the
tremendous
success
it
received.
A
But
you
know
but
but
it
got
this
like
you
know,
but
it's
actually
a
ranked
number
one.
Two,
three,
four:
five,
six,
seven,
eight
number
nine.
So
the
ninth
most
voted
on,
but
it
didn't
get
funded
because
of
the
because
of
the
the
high
amount
requested,
and
you
can
contrast
it,
for
example,
with
the
japan,
cardano
governance
association.
A
That's
that
asks
for
a
really
small
amount
and
although
they
were
ranked
much
much
lower,
they
get
funded.
So
that's
like
a
really
good
strategy
to
consider
and
think
about
how
many
others
could
have
been
funded
if,
if
they
just
started
by
asking
for
smaller
amounts
where
they
can
basically
prove
their
worth.
A
For
one
funding
cycle
and
how
much
their
position
is
going
to
be
better,
you
know,
after
after
they
fulfill
their
obligations
and
are
up
for
vote
again,
and
I
expect
a
lot
a
lot
more
insights
and
I
want
to
invite
people
from
the
community
that
are
looking
at
this
data
and
statistics
to
to
jump
on
maybe
next
week
and
and
talk
about
it.
There
they're
invited
just
just
message,
anna
through
telegram
and
and
she
will
she
will
set
the
time
for
you
to
to
talk.
A
A
This
is
a
this
is
a
demonstration
of
of
a
really
really
healthy
ecosystem,
okay,
so
it's
it
means,
basically
that
that
that
you
know
that
there's
more
there's
more
demand
than
supply.
Okay.
So
so
so
that
the
proposer
is
have
found
who
did
did
an
incredible
job
and
they
formed
so
many
so
many
high
quality
proposals
that
that
that
form
this
gap
and
and
and
we
need
to
celebrate
it
and
and
of
course
the
so
only
now
we
know
this
data
and
we're
going
to
take
that
into
account.
A
As
as
we're
leveling
up,
you
know
the
the
amounts
under
control.
Okay,
so
so
we
know
that
funds3
is
going
to
control
half
a
million,
and
that
feels
great
okay.
So
so
you
know
it
might
have
been
higher,
but
it's
already
been
announced,
but
I
mean
this
is
definitely
going
to
this
kind
of
this
kind
of
statistics.
Okay,
so
we're
going
to
track
this
over
time.
Okay,
so
so
how
many
we
wanted
funded
but
didn't
manage
and
that's
going
to
influence
the
pace
of
of
the
of
funding
to
come?
A
Okay,
so
so
we're
going
to
keep
track
of
it
and-
and
our
goal
is
to
be
to
be
in
balance
right
to
to
have
you
know,
I
think
it's.
I
think
it's
good
that
there's
like
a
few
proposals,
that
you
know
that
that's
very
competitive.
I
think
it's
overall
good
for
the
community,
but
of
course
now
there
was
like
a
bit
of
this
was
like
the
first
time
we
took
this
measurement,
and
now
we
see
that
that
we
always
got
double.
A
You
know
what
we
wanted,
so
we're
gonna
double
it
and
we
might
continue
to
to
double
and
double
the
funding
until
until
we
hit
an
equilibrium
point.
A
more
important
aspect
here
is
about
the
legitimacy
of
power.
Okay,
so,
and
it's
important
to
to
know
that
power
is
earned.
Okay
power
is
not
is
not
given,
so
it's
like
you
know
it.
It's
not
like.
There
is
a
monarchy
and
you're
a
king
and
you
deserve
x.
A
A
So
this
is
why
we're
doing
it
step
by
step
we're
we're
establishing
the
legitimacy
of
what
we're
doing
here-
and
this
is
not.
This
is
not
a
game
of
perception
just
in
the
eyes
of
this
community.
This
is
this
is
a
game
of
this
is
a
much
larger
game.
This
is
a
game
about
the
legitimacy
of
decentralized
governance
in
a
world
that
is
centrally
governed.
A
Okay,
that
in
a
world
where
the
default
is,
is
centralized
governance
having
like
one
or
a
handful
of
people,
making
the
decisions
and
everybody
in
a
kind
of
like
hierarchical
manner,
like
you
know,
falling
in
line.
You
know
we
need
to
really
see.
We
need
to
really
show
and
demonstrate
not
that
we're
like
a
bit
better.
We
need
to
show
that
we're
a
lot
better
when
we,
when
we,
when
we
show
that
then
the
revolution
comes
so
let's
get
prepared
for
that
and
let's
build
up
towards
that.
A
Basically,
the
goal
of
this
is-
is
to
increase
the
amount
of
quality
proposals
in
the
process
and
recognizing
that,
in
order
to
do
that,
in
order
to
keep
you
know
to
keep
increasing
the
funding
amounts
and
and
legitimize
our
power,
we
need
to
strive
to
get
basically
the
best
and
brightest
entrepreneurs
and
developers
in
the
world
to
come
and
join
so
we're
starting
a
small
experiment
for
funds3
it
might
it
you
know,
depends
on
the
outcomes
we
might.
We
might,
you
know,
increase
it
or
modify
it,
but
take
it
as
a
humble
experiment.
A
So
one
percent
of
unwanted
treasury
is
going
to
be
allocated
to
incentivize
referrals,
so
so
so
a
total
of
five
cane
adders.
So
that
means,
if
you,
thanks
to
your
efforts-
and
you
manage
to
convince
your
friend
or
a
colleague
or
someone
from
your
office-
or
you
know
your
uncle-
I
don't
know
whatever.
Okay
or
just
someone
online
and
and
you
convince
them
to
to
submit
a
proposal
and
that
proposal
got
funded.
A
A
This
incredible
impact
that
we
plan
that
we
plan
to
to
get
so
the
award
is
going
to
be
up
to
500
dollars
in
ada
per
funded
per
funded
proposal,
and
we
basically
at
the
end
of
fence,
3
we're
going
to
look
at
all
the
referrals
and
we're
going
to
divide
the
the
total
reward,
the
5k
evenly
between
eligible
participants.
So
basically
it
means
that,
like
let's
say,
if
we
have
10
eligible
referrals,
then
each
one
is
get
will
get
the
500
okay
in
ada.
A
So
how
do
you
get
this
referrer
incentive?
So
you
go
you
you
convince
a
proposer
to
to
join
and
when
the
proposer
submits
his
initial
proposal,
we're
going
to
add
to
the
submission
form,
an
ability
to
mention
the
email
of
the
referrer
and
also
a
description
of
like
we
know
what
what
happened.
How
was
he
referred
to
exactly
what?
What
was
the
situation?
I'll
talk?
A
You
know
so
you're
gonna
be
eligible
for
2x,
okay,
the
incentive
and
lastly,
so
this
is
a.
This
is
an
experiment
that
we
wanted
to
deploy
quickly
and
effectively-
and
just
be
honest,
you
know
like
if,
if
you
weren't
referred,
if
you
just
discovered
it
on
your
own
terms,
you
know
don't
fill
up
that
you
know.
Don't
cheat,
don't
be
a
cheater.
It's
not
cool!
A
Please
be
honest.
You
know
we're
not
gonna
launch
an
investigation
into
any
particular
case.
I
think
there's
like
a
lot
of
trust
in
the
system
and
and
of
course
you
know
if,
if
there's
a
lot,
you
know
if
there's
cheaters,
then
the
system
would
break.
So,
let's,
let's
see
how
this
goes
and
and
just
be
really
honest
with
yourself.
You
know:
if
someone
really
brought
you
and
made
you
a
proposer,
then
he
he
deserves
the
incentive,
if
not
not
so
just
be
just
to
be
clear
all
right.
A
So
let's
talk
about
what's
next,
so
you
know
we
have
funded
teams,
we're
launching
the
cohort
so
on
the
on
the
15th,
we're
gonna
we're
going
to
send
out
the
funding
for
for
proposers
and
for
this
round
we
made
a
decision.
This
is
a
one-time
decision,
so
starting
functioning
onwards,
and
there
will
be
we're
going
to
introduce
more
accountability,
measures
and
and
funds
are
going
to
send
in
sentence
stages,
but
for
fund
2.
You
know
taking
a
lot
into
account
all
the
months
of
of
waiting
and
and
the
delays.
A
A
A
So
it's
like
a
very
like
a
collaborative
competition.
Let's
call
it
in
our
fanta
is
really
trying
to
get
as
much
impact
as
as
possibly
can
from
all
these
all
these
people
and
all
this
funding
engaged
and
there's
also
be
a
reporting
mechanism
implemented
where
the
teams
are
going
to
report
back
to
the
community,
the
progress
and
the
the
tracking
of
the
metrics.
A
So
I
think,
lastly,
for
you
funded
teams.
You
know
I
just
want
to
say
that
the
community
is
right
behind
you,
so
we
are
here
we're
all
here
now
now
that
you
funded,
you
know,
there's
no
more,
no
more
campaigning.
Now,
it's
all
about
you
know.
Let's
achieve
you
know
it's
get
get
get
the
best
thing.
We
can
out
the
door
and
you
have
incredible
resources
that
are
laid
in
front
of
you
if
you
just
know
how
to
use
them.
You
know
like
people
willing
to
test
your
software.
A
People
are
willing
to
give
you
feedback
additional
implementers
available
in
the
community
to
to
help
you
get
over
specific
blocks
or
specific
deliverables.
You
might
not
have
the
capacity
the
connections
as
so
this
includes
so
everything
within
you
know
all
the
treasures
of
the
community
also,
but
also
for
iog
and
and
cf
you
know
are,
are
gonna
be
available
for
you.
A
A
So,
and,
and
now
we're
starting
to
so
now,
we're
launching
the
fun
to
execution
phase
and
we're
starting
to
track
the
return
on
intention.
So
so
what?
What
was
the
intention
right?
We
tried
to
decide.
How
can
our
efforts
manage
to
attract
developers
and
entrepreneurs
to
our
ecosystem?
So
this
is
what
we're
going
to
try
to
to
track
how
much
developers
and
entrepreneurs
it.
We
attracted
how
many
depths
and
businesses
got
built
thanks
to
the
efforts
of
the
funded
teams.
Okay,
so
here
we
go
here.
We
start.
A
So
what
next?
So,
if
you're,
if
you're
proposing
team
you
didn't
receive
funding,
so
you
know
funds,
we're
gonna,
have
double
the
funding
amount
and
also
you
know,
there's
there's
two
two
direct
tracks
to
receive
funding,
so
there's
more
opportunity
for
you
to
double
the
opportunity
for
you,
so
I
I
really
encourage
you
to
take
advantage
of
that
and
and
and
submit.
A
I
think
it's
nice
to
consider
now
that
you
got
the
feedback,
maybe
consider
the
amount
you're
asking
for
it
might
be
that
just
like
tweaking
the
proposal
amount
is
gonna,
get
you
funded
and,
as
I
said
before,
really
consider
merging
proposals
together
in
order
to
to
attract
the
larger
voter
base
and
and
just
having
better
impact
and
yeah.
We
apply
reapply
reapply.
A
We
want
you
here,
we
want
you
part
of
it
and
we
want
you
to
find
your
your
place
so,
and
this
is
the
intention
of
this
process,
the
intentional
process
is
to
continually
iterate
and
nurture
those
proposals
every
six
weeks.
You
know
like
every
time,
they're
gonna
be
winners
and
losers.
You
know
it's
it's
it's
for
you
know,
that's
we
have
limited
resources
right,
but
but
the
entire
community
is
here
for
you
to
help
you
to
iterate
and
improve
on
your
proposal.
A
All
right
so,
let's
say
moving
away
from
the
voting
results
and,
let's
take
take
a
larger
look
about
about
the
the
movement
and
changes
between
fun
to
and
fund
three.
So
we
we
started
with
the
phantom
the
our
first
week.
Perspective
challenge
really
did
not
succeed.
It
was
really
not
a
success.
We
had,
we
got
impressive
numbers,
we
had
516
perspectives
shared
compared
to
a
152
now,
but
the
quality
was
completely
different,
like
in
in
the
those
516
perspectives.
A
People
didn't
really
get
the
prompt
of
what
we
asked
about
sharing
perspectives,
the
like
95
percent
of
people
just
shared
their
proposal,
and
now,
if
you
look
at
the
perspective,
you
see
really
high
quality
proposals,
so
so
I
think
152
perspectives
of
of
quality
is
much
better
than
516.
That
are
the
misunderstood
the
instructions.
So
that's
actually
a
good
good
information
point
in
terms
of
comments.
Actually
it's
like
reverse
okay,
so
we
had
2045
comments
and
now
it's
493,
so
that's
really
proportional
to
to
the
amounts
of
perspective
shared.
A
A
Our
announcement
channel
more
than
doubled
participation
in
the
catalyst
chat
as
kind
of
forexed,
and
let's
see
it
would
be
interesting
in
six
weeks
to
see
the
difference
between
funds3
and
fund
four
and
if
we
can
maintain
this
crazy
pace
of
growth
by
the
way.
So
we
have
this
announcement
channel
in
the
catalyst,
chat
and
there's
links
here
and
I
hopana
is
sharing
them.
I
think
I
think
it's
a
great
place
to
to
join
and
engage.
A
Also,
I
wanted
to
compare
community
and
where
we
started
in
fund
2
and
where
we
are
at
right
now
so
so
number
of
entrepreneurs
we
started
with
617
entrepreneurs.
Now
we
have
1700.
You
know
we
started
with
413
developers.
Now
we
are
almost
triple
like
almost
like
1189,
okay
operators,
more
than
doubled,
marketers
tripled.
A
So
last
week
I
talked
about
the
two
major
catalyst
goals
for
2021
adoption
and
emancipation.
I
talked
about
adoption.
I
I
said
I
said
I
will
talk
about
emancipation
this
week,
unfortunately,
because
there's
so
much
content
to
share
and
because
you
know
just
been
it's
just
been
really
intense
week
for
for
our
for
our
team
and
specifically
me
with
with
all
the
funding
and
etc
we're
gonna
talk
about
emancipation
in
depth
next
week.
Okay,
so
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna
postpone
it
and
prioritize
more
critical
information
for
this
down
hall,
but
stay
tuned.
A
So,
let's
look
at
the
types
of
it
so
I
want
to.
I
want
you
to
really
take
a
look
at
these
insights
that
we've
been
shared
and,
and
here
just
like
kind
of
almost
randomly.
I
I
pulled
up
a
few
insights
and
just
looking
like
you
know
just
like
quickly
looking
through
it
and
and
just
to
show
you
how
how
amazing
it
is
actually
to
look
at
this
to
use
this
resource.
A
Okay,
that
the
our
community
had
the
week
to
really
reflect
on
challenges
and
be
more
a
bit
in
brainstorming
mode
in
ideation
mode,
in
analysis,
mode
and,
and
you
know,
and
before
just
coming
up
with
solutions
like
thinking
a
bit
more
about
the
problem
and
how
to
effectively
address
it.
Okay,
so
we've
said
we
had
chris
talking
about
how
yield
is
king
with
rick
making
like
a
like
a
general
suggestions
about
retirement
products.
A
Hugo
talked
about
an
educational
platform
for
students
and
greg
posed
a
problem
that
you
know,
subscription
models
and
and
their
issues
and
and
and
how
can?
How
can
we
replace
it-
and
this
is
just
like
four
out
of
I
believe,
like
90,
different
perspectives
on
the
depth
challenge
for
the
developer
ecosystem?
A
A
Can
we
take
it
as
part
of
this
challenge
and
joseph
mentioned,
like
a
cardano
developer
community
portal
and
how
it
would
be
great
to
have
relevant,
up-to-date
information
about
what
cannot
and
what
can
and
cannot
be
technical
available
or
function.
So
it's
like
an
amazing
insight.
I
think
it
will
have
a
lot
of
value
if
someone
picks
up
that
brain
talked
about
targeted
marketing
to
asco
developers
and
take
a
look
at
the
challenge,
and
I
think
the
third
one
was
the
community
choice.
A
A
There
was
two
two
two
perspectives
about
doing
like
in
africa,
localized
challenged
and
the
indiana
challenge,
like
some
I
didn't
put
here.
But
if
you
know
think
about
challenge,
it
only
solves
the
issue
of
privacy.
Okay.
So
so
what
if
we
incentivize
people
to
work
on
like
enhanced
privacy
features
in
the
cardinal
ecosystem
or
what?
If
we
had
one
that
focused
on
specific
market
like
housing
and
real
estate?
A
So
you
can
go
into
any
one
of
like
it's
still
a
on
the
main
pages
of
a
d
scale
for
each
challenge
and
there's
lots
and
lots
and
lots
of
other
insights
and
again
which
research
shows
that
when
people
share
this
and
the
proposals
actually
go
and
read,
it
has
a
really
amazing
effect
on
the
on
the
final
outcome.
Okay,
on
the
final
score,
that's
giving
to
proposers
to
proposals
so
use
that
you
know,
use
the
science
and
and
get
inspired
and
see
the
world
from
different
people's
perspective.
A
That's
the
top
priority
and
part
of
it
is
like
when
we
we
don't
meet,
though
the
the
the
dates
that
we've
set
we're
going
to
come
and
talk
to
you
about
it
and
we're
going
to
explain
what
happened
and
and
what
we're
doing
doing
to
improve
okay.
So
this
is
this
is
part
of
us
improving
our
own
process.
You
know
and
the
same
way
we
ask
you
to
iterate
and
improve
your
trading
and
improving
over
time,
so
we
had
to
miss
two
minutes.
Two
missed
dates.
A
So
at
two
days
delay
what
happened
and
it's
a
bit
embarrassing,
but
we
we
simply
overlook
the
fact
that
the
tenses
is
a
weekend
and
we
just
didn't,
have
people
on
deck
to
do
it
and
then
and
then
on
the
11th.
We
realized
that
there
was
a
bit
more
coordination
with
with
the
communication
department,
and
so
we
decided
so
so
we
decided
it's
it's
best
to
to
delay
it
again
by
one
day.
So
that's
how
we
got
to
the
12th
so
and
we're
learning
from
this.
So
we're
we're
we're
not
gonna.
A
You
know
we're
gonna,
take
these
things
into
account
next
time
and
avoid
this
type
of
delay,
and
also
we
announced
that
funding
would
be
done
on
the
12th.
So
it's
actually
going
to
be
done
in
two
phases,
so
they're
going
to
be
one
fund,
so
so
funding
for
proposals
is
going
to
happen
on
the
15th
and
a
reward.
Distribution
for
voters
and
community
advisors
is
going
to
happen
on
the
20th.
A
So
this
is
something
to
explain
this.
I
actually
I
can't
be
completely
transparent,
but
we
I
can
only
say
that
we
identify
the
security
risk
and
an
attack
vector
that
we
didn't
anticipate
using
the
some
funding
methodology
that
we're
going
to
use
and-
and
we
had
to
kind
of
do
a
skirmish-
and
you
know,
revise
the
the
plan
and
technique
in
order
to
provide
funding
and
that
led
us
to
having
to
separate
the
the
funding
phases
into
two
steps
and
and
the
delay.
A
So
for
this
we
apologize,
but
really
our
priorities
is
safety,
and
so
sometimes
when
we,
when
we
identify
a
security
risk
or
something
like
that,
you
know
it
might
lead
to
delays.
So
you
know
just
want
to
just
want
to
explain
what
what
happened
and
and
hopefully
over
time,
we're
also
going
to
get
better
protocols
about
what
we
can
share
and
what
we
can
share
and
how
to
share
it
even
better,
and
we
have
a
specific
person
that
would
that
would
deliver
retrospectives
to
the
community
in
a
transparent
way.
A
All
right
community,
quick
community
corner-
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
some
bottom-up
tools
created
by
the
community
for
the
community
first
and
foremost,
of
the
discord
channel.
It's
an
amazing
resource
really
place
for
proposers
to
collaborate
to
receive
feedback.
There's
like
massive
amounts
of
different
activities
going
there.
So
if
you
really
want
to
get
get,
you
know
take
a
deep
dive
into
into
catalyst
and
in
a
more
kind
of
a
work.
A
Like
you
know,
environments
like,
I
think
I
think
this
discord
is
a
great
place
and
and
and
thank
you
steven
and
all
the
other
and
all
the
other
community
members
that
made
it
possible.
Then
we
have
a
an
amazing
project,
a
dashboard
by
danny
and
an
amazing
summary
of
of
all
the
numbers
right,
all
the
numbers
and
and
the
proposers
and
some
analysis.
A
A
Okay.
Actually,
this
is
I'm
not
gonna
talk
about
okay.
So
let's
talk
about
what's
going
to
happen
this
week,
so
we
are
launching
the
proposal
draft
submission
stage.
Okay,
so
what
does
it
mean?
Basically,
in
a
few
hours
from
now
we're
we're
going
to
open
submissions
of
proposals
for
fund
three
we
will
get.
We
will
put
an
announcement
in
a
in
a
d
scale
like
so
probably
you
know
it's
probably
like
official
like
you
know
it
will
probably
start
in
a
few
hours
and
then
we'll
send
the
announcement
tomorrow.
A
But
basically
you
have
a
week
to
submit
your
proposal
and
after
that
you
won't
be
able
to
submit
the
proposal
after
that.
We're
just
going
to
to
you
know,
give
and
receive
feedback
about
and
iterates
on,
the
proposals
that
were
submitted
so
so
make
sure
to
put
your
to
get
your
proposal
out
there
if
you
want
to
participate
in
the
process,
so
what's
going
to
happen
in
id
scale,
so
we're
going
to
take
all
the
perspectives
and
we're
going
to
archive
them.
A
A
So
let's
talk
about
what's
what's
a
proposer
and
and
who's
the
proposal
and
who's
an
implementer,
so
proposer
is
like
the
ceo
of
the
proposal.
Okay,
so
that's
the
person,
that's
really
accountable
towards
that
that
the
actual
proposal
is
does
what
it
says
it
does
and
that's
also
the
person
who's
have
basically
control
over
the
funds,
and
so
you
know
we're
sending
the
funding
to
them
and
implementers
are
all
the
contractors
and
partners
that
are
working
with
the
proposer
to
implement
the
proposal.
Okay,
so
just
because
you
so
basically
what
does
it
mean?
A
It
means
that,
like
just
because
you're
the
proposer
doesn't
mean
you
have
to
do
everything.
You
know
it
just
means
that
you're,
like
the
the
ceo
you're,
the
manager
of
the
operation,
and
you
know
and
you're
accountable.
You
know
you
make
the
decisions,
but
you're
definitely
welcome
to
to
come
and
work
with
other
people
and
and-
and
you
know
you
can
decide
on
the
status
if
they're
they
can
either
be
co-proposers.
A
A
That
is
about
which
dapps
should
be
built
to
drive
you
their
adoption
and
we
have
the
community
we
have.
So
let's
talk
about
the
very
ecosystem,
easier,
okay,
so
the
developer
ecosystem
challenge,
which
is
like
how
can
we
encourage
developers
to
build
apps
on
top
of
cardano?
And
then
we
have
the
community
choice?
A
Okay,
so
so,
which
is
kind
of
a
almost
like
a
meta
challenge.
That
is
like
a
challenge
about
challenges
which
is
like
starting
fund.
Five,
whatever
challenges
that
are
gonna
be
selected
like
that
are
gonna,
be
proposed
now
are
gonna,
be
real
challenges
in
the
catalyst
process,
so
this
is
the
first
step
of
emancipation
of
the
community
that
sets
the
its
own.
The
community
sets
its
own
goals
versus
the
adapt
creation
and
developer
ecosystem
that
was
basically
made
top
down
by
the
by
the
catalyst
team.
A
A
This
dab
created
like
how
much
of
you
know,
so
if,
if
this
dab
also
have
its
own
local
token
and
native
token,
you
know,
was
the
volume
increased,
how
many
transactions
were
made
using
the
using
this
dap
generated
by
this
dap
and
how
much
funds
were
actually
transacted
so
not
just
like
how
many
transactions
but
the
quality
of
the
transactions?
If
they
have,
you
know
if
it
manages
like
giant
amounts
of
of
funds
that
have
a
lot
of
impact
or
it's
a
cryptokitties?
Okay,
it's
like
there's
a
difference.
A
For
the
developer
ecosystem,
it's
a
bit
simpler!
It's
it's
simply
saying
like
okay,
how
how
much?
How
many
developers
did
we
manage
to
attract
like
this
proposal
and
and
a
secondary
thing?
Is
that
how
many
developers
were
successfully
onboarded
that
they
managed
to
actually
develop
software
on
top
of
cardano?
So
it's
one
thing
to
get
someone
to
read
a
tutorial,
but
what
about
actually
writing
code?
You
know
actually
actually
launching
something
built
on
top,
so
so
it's
yeah.
We
call
it
hunting
and
farming.
Okay.
A
For
the
community
choice,
it's
a
bit
it's
a
bit
harder
to
track
exactly
because
it's
a
bit
of
a
difference.
It
has
a
bitter
challenge
with
a
different
nature
and
but
what
we're?
But
what
we're
going
to
roughly
look
at
is
you
know
once
this
challenge
is
up
and
then
the
community
makes
proposals
for
it.
You
know:
did
we
get
the
did?
A
Did
the
challenge
like
you
know,
engage
the
the
proposals
made
were
of
high
quality
and
and
to
determine
high
quality,
we're
going
to
look
at
the
community
advisor
score
for
the
top
10
of
proposals
that
were
submitted
and
I'm
going
to
talk
a
bit
more
about
community
advisors
if,
if
you're
not
up
to
date
about
that
later,
but
basically
there's
a
a
bunch
of
people
who
are
going
to
review
these
proposals,
then.
The
second
question
was
the
challenge
engaging
okay.
So
was
there
voter
engagement
and
community
and
and
proposer
engagement
with
that
that
challenge?
Okay?
A
So
these
proposals
that
you
put
these
proposals
that
you
you
know
you're
gonna,
you're
gonna,
put
up
there
and
fan
three
are
gonna,
get
gonna
gonna
be
reviewed,
okay,
so
they're
gonna,
be
reviewed
by
these
community
advisors
and
there's
three
criteria
and
one
big
change
from
fan
to
is
that
you
know
we're
not
gonna
weigh
the
the
impact.
You
know
it's
gonna
be
equal
impact
like
equal
weight
for
each
one
of
those
criteria.
So
it's
not
even
mentioned
here,
so
it's
gonna
be
we're
gonna,
look
at
the
impact.
A
So
how
likely
this
proposal
is
to
be
implemented
successfully
given,
given
the
experience
and
the
plan
proposed
to
to
implement
by
by
the
proposing
team
and
auditability
so
like
in
the
first
place
inside
the
proposal?
Was
there
enough
information
provided
to
even
determine
the
impact
and
feasibility
each
one
of
these
criteria?
The
community
advisors
are
going
to
give
a
score
of
one
to
five
and
according
to
how
much
they
agree
on
it.
A
And
then
the
so
so
so,
with
this
criteria,
they
will
review
the
proposers
and
I
think,
we're
going
to
open
the
registration
for
community
advisors
next
week,
and
but
just
note
that
you
cannot
be
a
proposer
on
the
same
fund
that
you're
advising
and
you
cannot
be
an
implementer
or
like
kind
of
like
deeply
involved
with
a
proposal.
That's
on
the
ballot
and
also
remember
that
the
reviews
are
just
advice
for
the
voters.
As
we've
seen
from
the
voting
results,
you
know
it
was
advice.
It
wasn't.
A
All
the
proposals
are
gonna
appear
in
the
voting,
app
and
looking
kind
of
like
this,
and
and
and
people
would
able
to
go
through
the
proposals
and
look
at
them.
So
when
you
write
the
proposal,
think
about
that,
you
know
think
about
how
it's
actually
gonna
be
displayed
for
for
the
voters
as
well,
so
because
they
have
gonna
have
a
kind
of
a
shorter
interface
with
the
link
to
id
scale
where
they
can
read
exact
details
over
there.
A
A
A
A
A
You
know
you
start
by
describing
what's
the
ideal
state
of
affairs,
then
you
can
explain
your
problem,
then
you
can
explain
why
this
problem
is
relevant
to
the
challenge
like
what
is
financial
costs
like
what's
the
numbers
here?
What's
what's
the
the
quantifiable
components
there
like
financial
cost
opportunity,
costs,
etc
and
then
try
to
provide
evidence
why
you
know?
Why
are
your
claims
actually
based
on
on
reality
and
not
just
the
figment
of
your
imagination?
A
Okay,
so
once
you
have
these
four
components,
then
you
can
construct
with
them
a
sentence
and
so
look
at
this
example.
We
also
have
a
proposer
guideline
to
share
with
you
and
that
kind
of
helps
you
go
through
this
process
even
in
more
detail
after
the
problem
comes
the
solution.
Okay,
so
you
define
the
problem.
So
how
are
you
gonna?
How
are
you
gonna,
address
it
and
make
sure
the
problem
is
that
the
solution
is
directly
addressing
the
problem,
so
it's
like
make
sense
and
discuss
how
your
solution
is
is
different.
A
You
know,
then
existing
solutions
or
like
default
solutions
like
already
in
the
world.
Why
would
people
use
it
solve
it
through
your
proposal,
rather
than
you
know,
some
other
thing
that
already
exists
or
or
a
competitor
make
sure
that
make
sure
that
you're
actually
solving
a
problem
rather
than
just
you
know,
looking
for
a
problem.
A
A
Doesn't
like
tens
and
like
decades
of
of
work
in
in
innovation
and
innovation
management,
so
really
really
really
make
sure
to
connect
your
make
sure
that
that
you
start
with
the
problem
and
then
solve
it
rather
than
the
other
way,
and
and
there's
like
a
bunch
of
details
right
about
the
solution
and
you
you
will
you
find
yourself
in
the
proposal
with
not
enough
room
to
write
all
of
it?
So
all
the
details
about
the
specific
solution,
you're
offering
go
into
the
planning
details
section
and,
lastly,
there's
a
relevant
experience.
A
So
this
is
really
critical
for
the
feasibility
again,
we
prefer,
I
think,
not
just
me
and
catholic,
but
I
think
the
community
prefers
people
just
being
sticking
to
facts
and
sticking
to
actual
things
you
you
done
versus.
You
know,
hype
building,
okay,
that
you,
like
amazing
and
competent,
and
super
talented,
doesn't
really
fly
like
saying
that
you
completed
a
phd,
you
deliver
this
amount
of
software.
A
So
if
I
know
you
did
something
similar
in
the
past,
like
the
it's,
it's
much
more
likely
that
you're
gonna
be
able
to
actually
do
it
again,
you
know,
rather,
if
it's
like
something
you're
doing
for
the
first
time,
so
you
know-
and
it's
not
just
about
you-
you
can
also
join.
You
know
it's
you
and
your
co-proposers
and
all
the
implementers
and
you
can
put
all
of
the
relevant
experience
of
the
team
there.
Not
not
just
you
as
a
proposer.
A
Also
better
look,
you
know
if
you,
if
you
have
already
this
initiative,
already,
have
some
traction.
You
have
a
huge
advantage.
You
know
if
you
already,
you
know,
launch
something
small
that
already
have
traction,
and
then
you
just
want
to
expand
it.
You
have
a
lot
more.
The
risk
profile
of
yours
is
a
lot
a
lot
lower.
A
You
know
you
request
it
in
dollars.
You
will
receive
it
in
ada,
the
the
ada
equivalent
in
dollars,
true
to
the
true
to
the
to
the
dollar
ada
exchange
rates
at
the
date.
When
you
finalize
your
proposal
and
if
that
what
I
said
now
is
really
hard
for
you
to
understand,
just
think
about
it
like
this.
Okay,
so
if
I
come
in,
if
when
you
propose
you're
asking
for
a
hundred
bucks
when
you,
when
you
get
funded,
you're
gonna
get
a
hundred
bucks.
A
Okay,
let's
make
it
very
simple.
You
ask
for
200
bucks
you're
going
to
get
100
bucks
doesn't
matter
if
the
market
plunged
or
plummeted,
then
you
know
it
doesn't
matter.
You're
gonna
get
what
you
requested,
because
we
expect
this
a
lot
of
this.
You
know-
maybe
not
all,
but
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
this
funding
to
actually
go
pay,
people
and
and
buy
stuff
and
and
so
we're
using
dollars
right
now,
in
this
initial
draft
stage,
you
don't
need
to
know
how
much
dollars
you're
requesting
it's.
A
You
don't
need
to
know
in
advance.
You
know
you
can
you
can
you
can
leave
that
you
can
leave
that
blank?
You
know
for
for
for
this
stage,
and
you
know
we're
gonna
start
to
crunch
the
numbers
you
know
and
and
and
we
expect
you
to
get
to
a
concrete
amount
by
the
time
we
get
to
closer
to
the
finalization
stage.
Of
course,
if
you
want
the
community
feedback
about
the
amount
you're
asking,
if
it
seems
reasonable,
then
put
it
and
then
you
will
get
feedback,
but
you
can
change
it.
It's!
Okay!
A
A
And,
lastly,
like
you
know
what
set
of
the
the
intellectual
property
rights
of
of
the
proposal?
So
you
know
so
the
community
knows,
if
they're
buying
in
into
something
that
can
be
later,
like
it's
a
personal,
open
source
thing
that
can
later
be
iterated
and
improved
with
the
community,
and
you
know
or
or
it's
you
know,
a
commercial
product
and,
and
you
own
all
the
ip
you
know
it.
So
I'm
not
saying
this
is
better
than
the
other.
A
A
And
then
again
like,
as
I
said
in
the
earlier
about
the
the
referral
incentive,
we're
going
to
add
two
fields:
they're
going
to
be
two
fields,
one,
the
email
of
a
referrer
and
also
how
are
you
referred
to
exactly
so
example
answer?
Is
you
know
I
we
discu,
you
know
I
I
met
john.
We
met
in
the
platform
x.
You
know,
he
talked
to
me,
told
me
how
amazing
catalyst
is
and
send
me
a
link
to
join,
and
then
I
get
hooked.
You
know
like
whatever
like
something
give
us
some
information.
A
A
And
lastly,
we're
going
to
give
a
not
less
limit,
probably
there's
a
few
more.
You
know
we're
going
to
help
you
in
this
stage
to
find
implementers,
so
you
don't
have
to
have
a
complete
team
at
this
stage.
Quite
yet,
you
can
put
your
idea
there
see
if
you
have
traction
and
see
if
you
find
collaborators
we're
going
to
give
you
an
ability
to
to
put
tags
on
your
proposal,
and
these
tags
are
like
need.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
Okay,
so
yeah
in
the
discord
server,
we've
got
building
a
team
there's
a
channel
in
there
building
a
team
there's
also
some
folks
in
there
who
have
a
tag.
That's
dev
for
hire,
so
you
know:
hey,
they're,
a
developer
and
they're
and
they're
looking
for
looking
for
a
job,
then
there's
also,
you
know
just
go
and
look
in
in
the
different
channels
for
the
different
proposals,
and
if
you
think
that
you
have
talent
where
you
could
apply
your
talent,
I
mean
a
lot
of
these
proposals.
B
They
might
have
all
the
talent
they
need
very
well
need
more
talent
than
what
they've
got.
So
I
would
say
you
know
anywhere
in
there
and
then,
if
you've
got
questions
you
know
just
hit,
you
know
hit
the
general
channel
and
and
say
hey.
I
need
some
help.
I
was
just
helping
a
guy
he's
trying
to
figure
out
where
his
proposal
should
go.
So
we're
we're
we're
wicked
busy,
and
I
don't
know
what
you
did
door,
but
the
numbers
just
went
through
the
roof
on
discord.
So
thank
you
guys
for
that.
B
B
Like
me,
like
me,
I'm
trying
to
multitask
and
not
not
very
well,
it
would
appear
because
I
can't
get
my
mic
to
work.
So
I
don't
know
what
else
you
want
me
to
say
door.
I
don't.
I
certainly
don't
want
to
capitalize
too
much
time
here,
but
there's
a
lot
there's
a
lot
of
assistance.
There's
I
think
we've
typically
got
three
or
four
admins
online
there
so
pop
in,
if
you're
not
sure
what
to
do
we'll
we'll
get
you
moved
over
in
in
the
direction
you
need
to
go.
B
A
A
Totally
or
like
things
are
like
now,
I
think
this
this
year
we're
going
to
have
a
constant
state
of
hyper
growth,
and
you
know
always
be
under
capacity
because
they're
just
going
to
get
this
stream
of
new
people
that
are
joining
all
the
time
and
and
or
people
leveling
up
their
participation,
so
yeah
come
come
help
steve
and
his
team.
It's
really
wow.
B
There's
there's
a
whole
bunch
of
people
in
there.
I'm
there
a
lot,
but
there's
a
whole
bunch
of
people
in
there
are
working
hard
to
make
sure
that
we
we
answer
the
needs.
You
know
what
what
folks
need
and
the
whole
idea
of
the
intention,
if
you
will
of
the
discord
server,
is
just
just
to
provide
something
like
a
breakout
room,
because
you
know
telegram
is
man?
That's
you
know
you
hop
into
telegram.
You
got
600
things
you
try
and
catch
up
on
and
it's
you
know
it's
all
crosstalk.
B
A
A
Okay!
I'm
gonna
go
back
to
my
slides.
There
are
a
few
more
it's
kind
of
hilarious.
How
much
content!
I
have
okay,
but
we're
gonna
get
through
this
all
right,
so
we
have
the
all
right.
So
I
gave
you
a
lot
of
stuff.
Okay,
so
there's
like
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
things,
especially
if
you're
new
in
this
process.
A
You
must
be
a
bit
overwhelmed
with
all
the
options
and
all
the
things
you
need
to
think
about,
and
I
want
to
give
you
an
advice:
how
to
do
it
step
by
step
and
not
not
get
too
entangled
in
too
many
things,
and
the
concept
is
time
well
spent.
Okay,
so
so
are
you
gonna
use
your
time
as
a
proposer,
so
this
week
just
focus
on
the
problem
statement
and
the
relevant
experience?
Okay,
just
worry
about
that.
A
Make
sure
that
your
problem
statement
is
excellent
and
that
that
you
really
articulate
why
you
can
tackle
the
problem.
You
can
start
to
work
a
bit.
You
can
put
a
draft
on
the
solution,
it's
a
bit
less
of
a
high
priority,
but
you
can
start
to
articulate
it
a
bit
to
get
to
get
some
feedback
to
get
to
see
if
you
find
like-minded
people
who
want
to
join
forces
with
you
and
really
a
low
priority,
as
in
you
can
just
like
not
do
that
for
this
week
is
the
detailed
plan
and
adder
requested.
A
You
know
start
start
with
the
big
picture.
Get
feedback
see
how
people
are
responding
and
then
you
can
dive
into
the
dive
into
the
details
later.
Of
course,
you
know
if
you
had
a
proposal
in
fund
two
or
found
one,
and
you
already
have
all
of
this
stuff.
You
know
kind
of
ready
and
you
just
want
to
do
a
little
iteration
on
that.
That's
also
great
okay,
but
but
for
new
people
like,
I
really,
you
know,
go
with
the
process
and
just
remember
every
six
weeks
a
new
funding
round
begins.
A
A
If
you
want
to
make
it,
if
you
want
to
joke
around
or
you
know,
then
there's
plenty
of
places
to
do
so
and
right
here
we
have
limited
limited
amount
of
time
and
and
attention
and-
and
we
want
to
be
focused
on
producing
valuable
stuff
that
that
can
be
serve
us.
You
know
in
the
future,
and
you
know
because
we
have
we
have.
We
have
a
big
mission,
so
just
be
be
serious.
Okay,
so
and
serious
have
two
two
meanings,
so
it
can
be.
A
So
from
some
places
you
know
when,
when
you
make
a
post,
when
you
make
a
chat,
when
you
post
a
proposal,
you
you're
gonna
have
a
drop
down
menu
that
that
asks
you
to
choose
which,
which
challenge
you
you're
using
so
okay,
you
use
this
so
use
it
and
don't
don't
confuse
it
with
the
project
catalyst
problem,
sensing
which
is,
which
is
a
very
different
thing,
there's
no
funding
there.
It's
just
about
indicating
things
that
can
be
fixed
like
in
the
process
itself,
and
it's
not
a
proposal.
It's
not
a
funding
proposal.
A
A
A
But
just
you
know
take
that
in
mind
and
remember
that
negativity
undermines
their
long-term
goals.
So
when
you
are
when
you
bring
negativity
into
the
discussion
as
opposed
to
you
know
it's
okay
to
be
critical,
you
know
it's
okay,
to
have
constructive
criticism
or
or
show
how
things
can
be
improving.
But
when
you
bring
negativity,
you
scare
people
away,
and
you
know
like
entrepreneurs
developers,
they
have
lots
of
options
in
the
world.
A
You
know
they
have
lots
of
different
places
where
people
are
being
nice
to
them
and
kind
to
them
and
where
they
don't
need
to
feel
where
they
don't
feel
attacked,
and
they
will
just
go
there
and
then
what
do
you
get?
You
know
you,
you
lose.
You
lose
all
the
impact
and
all
the
all
the
important
contributions
that
these
people
could
have
added
to
your
ecosystem,
so
really
think
carefully.
A
If
you,
when
you're
giving
feedback,
if
you're
introducing
negativity
into
the
conversation
or
you're
being
constructive
and,
on
the
other
hand,
okay,
the
proposer
just
know
that,
even
if
you
hear,
if
even
if
someone
tells
you
something,
that's
like
really
negative,
really
not
constructive,
just
understand
that
99
of
the
communities
is
right
behind
you
and
we
don't
see
it
as
in
positive
light.
The
negativity
thing
and
most
of
us
just
prefer
to
ignore
that.
A
A
And
lastly,
also
you
know
it's
also
not
not
the
time
to
campaign
right
now.
It's
not
the
time
to
like
say:
oh
voters
vote
for
me,
I'm
the
most
amazing.
It's
like
we're
gonna
have
after
five
weeks.
You
know
we're
gonna
get
to
the
governance
stage
and
then
then
the
campaigning
starts.
So
now
the
focus
is
not
getting
people
to
vote
for
you.
A
I
think
proposal
will
be
open
for
submission
I
can
be.
You
can
be
sure
that
it's
going
to
be
tomorrow,
but
probably
even
in
a
few
hours
and
make
sure
to
give
feedback
to
others,
a
constructive
feedback
to
help
them
already
get
started
with
improving
what
they're
doing
and
also
join
the
catalyst
and
announcement
channel
telegram.
A
A
It's
always
it's
always
insane
to
me
that
I
need
to
talk
for
like
an
hour,
15
straight,
I'm
not
used
to
that.
I'm
happy
for
a
little
pause
and
here
to
take
your
to
take
to
take
questions
so
usually
so
when
I
take
questions,
I
look
at
the
question.
Ask
a
question
section
and
I
look
at
things
that
get
a
lot
of
votes
and
I
try
to
and
I
and
I
try
to
address
them
by
the
by
the
order.
A
One
of
the
one
of
the
things
we're
gonna
one
of
the
things
that's
happening
for
us
this
year-
is
that
like
we're
starting
to
recruit
more
people-
and
you
know
kind
of
like
ramp
up
our
our
systems
and
capacities
and
one
way
would
be
to
add
more
people
that
might
manage
this
town
hall,
because
it's
really
it's
really
a
lot
to
to
to
communicate
all
these
things
at
once.
Okay,
so
can
we
vote
from
the
hardware
for
evan,
even
czar?
That's
a
great
name
for
funds3.
A
Can
we
vote
from
the
hardware
wallet
in
the
dedalus
and
no,
you
cannot
vote
from
the
hardware
wallet
in
deadloos
and
fund
three
we
are
putting.
We
are
putting
a
plan
in
place,
for
you
know
where
we're
basically
going
to
go
and
we're
going
to
make
voting
accessible
for
everybody
in
the
cardona
community.
So
when
we're
working
on
it
really
hard-
and
you
know
it's
gonna-
go
from
for
this
fund-
I'm
I'm
waiting
for
some
confirmations
to
give
you
an
announcement
about
some
improvements.
A
I
mean,
I
already
know
that
we've
already
fixed
a
few.
I
can
already
announce
that,
for
example,
we
had
issues
with
android
11,
and
so
we
solved
that
so
like
we
already
got
more
peop
more
people
in
france,
we're
gonna
be
able
to
vote,
but
actually
there's
like
a
few
more
key
announcements.
That's
gonna
gonna
get
made
before
the
governance
phase
of
funds3
about
making
it
easier
to
participate
in
voting
and
every
fund
you
know,
is
gonna
increase
and
increase.
A
The
issue
is
that
hardware
wallets
is
really
coming
a
bit
a
bit
less
in
that
queue.
Okay,
because
you
know
we
want
to
you
know,
there's
like
a
bunch
of
bugs.
We
need
to
fix,
then
there's
a
bunch
of
integrations.
We
need
to
do
with
deduce
and
uroi.
Then
we
have
a
token
locking.
That's
like
a
huge
mechanism.
A
You
know
that's
going
to
be
added,
and
only
then,
when
we
got
that,
then
we
can
start
to
work
on
the
hardware
wallet
integration.
So
it's
going
to
take
a
while,
but
you
know
we
know
it's
important
and,
and
we
know
we,
we
know
that
the
legitimacy
of
the
system
itself
is
is
that
everybody
can
participate
in
vote
without
compromising
their
their
security,
so
we're
working
on
it.
A
A
So
it's
really
important
the
right
now
we're
we're
trying
to
do
for
fun
for
for
refund
to
cohort
we're,
starting
with
the
model
of
transparency.
Okay,
all
right!
So
we
have
this.
We
have
these
weekly
cohort
meetings
and-
and
we
expect
the
all
the
funded
proposals
to
participate
and
part
of
these
meetings
are
included
like
giving
a
report
to
the
community
on
on
progress.
A
A
Oh,
you
said
one
two
three
and
you
didn't
deliver
item
three,
so
you
know
that's
that's
not
how
real
innovation
works,
so
we're
gonna.
Look
at
the,
but
we
are
gonna,
so
we're
gonna
track
the
not
not
not
the
how
but
we're
gonna
track
like
the
outcome.
So
if
you
get
the
outcome
of
the
challenge,
so
if
you,
if
you
managed
to
attract
developers,
if
you
decided
midway
to
pivot-
and
you
find
a
way
to
give
us
10x
the
outcomes
you
know
of
as
defined
in
what
we
track,
then
it's
amazing.
A
So
fun
to
we're,
starting
with
this
transparent
reporting
going
forward
with
funds,
three
four
etc.
You
know
at
least
we're
gonna
have.
If
people
are
gonna
get
funded
with
large
amounts,
we're
gonna,
you
know,
define
some
kind
of
mechanism
where
they're
not
getting
all
the
funds
at
once,
but
it's
kind
of
conditional
on
this,
like
reporting
and
and
and
progress,
and
basically
trust
in
these
people.
A
We
haven't
clearly
defined
yet
we're
weighing
a
few
different
options
to
do
so,
because
it
has
really
intense
ramifications
right
because
we
also
don't
want
to
put
sticks
in
the
wheels
of
an
innovator.
We
actually
want
them
to
be
able
to
to
dare
and
and
take
risks,
and
because
that's
that's
the
way
to
for
innovation.
So
so
the
short
answer
is
transparency,
conditional
funding
and
and
also
a
lot
to
be
explored
and
discovered
what
what
would
be
the
best.
A
A
A
If
you,
if
you
recovered
your
wallet
in
deadlock,
shouldn't
be
an
issue,
but
maybe
some
sp
like
like,
like
some
people
that
that
use
the
cli
just
need
to
make
sure
your
your
stake
is,
is
indeed
registered
and
well.
We
so
so
we're
working
on
it,
so
basically
beside
this
minor
hitch,
we
should
be.
We
should
be
on
on
on
track
and
to
do
that
on
on
the
20th.
A
According
to
the
timeline
rewards
and
funding
took
place
yesterday,
how
can
we
check
whether
our
voting
was
registered
on
the
other
side?
Okay,
do
we
have
to
carry
so?
This
is
even
again
so
do
we
have
to
carry
out
additional
steps,
or
should
we
just
wait?
Can
we,
independently
from
this
from
this
register,
to
fancy
voting?
Okay?
This
is
a
complicated
question
that
might
hold
within
it.
A
A
A
A
Questions,
okay,
I
see
greg
is
saying
I
see
a
lot
of
solutions
in
the
insights
phase
guilty
of
that
myself
is
the
insights
phase
working
the
way
the
catalyst
team
envisioned
we're
getting
there
we're
getting
there
in
front
two?
We
had
512
12
insights
shared
and
all
of
them
were
just
like
people
basically
proposing
solutions.
A
A
A
No,
not
if
you
can
get
you
know
not.
If
I
mean
you
know,
there's
an
edge
case
like
where
the
the
thing
you're
building
is
really
requires
a
developer,
and
then
you
really
need
a.
Maybe
a
co-proposer
should
be
a
developer
or
an
implementer
should
be
a
developer,
but
you
know
if,
if
you
have,
if
you
have
kind
of
like
the
the
skills
to
to
to
manage
and
lead
the
project,
no
problem
for
you
to
be
a
proposer.
A
A
A
It
saves
a
lot.
You
know,
I
don't
know
it's
interesting
to
think
about
it.
If,
if
you
know,
if
you
know,
if
we
discovered
that
a
lot
of
the
proposals
we
applied
and
are
completely
the
same,
then
yeah,
maybe
we
should
you
know,
maybe
we
should
transfer
the
the
feedback
from
advisors
from
the
last
round,
but
let's
see
how,
let's
think
things
are
see
how
things
pan
out.
I
I
I
would
imagine
that
people
like
serious
proposals
are
gonna.
A
Do
some
refining
of
their
proposals
between
funds
and
I'm
just
gonna
leave
things
in
exactly
identical
way.
You
know
like
like
the
definition
of
of
insanity,
is
you
know
doing
the
same
thing
but
expecting
a
different
outcome,
so
I
really
hope
people
actually
do
to
continue
to
iterate
and
refine
and
can
insights
proposals.
A
A
We
were
very
flexible
in
that
sense
that
that
people
are,
you
know
the
creative
juices
are
flowing.
The
feedback
is
flowing
like
midway
through
the
process,
like
you
realize
that
actually,
someone
else
for
the
community
is
is,
is
it
could
put,
would
make
it
more
impactful?
You
talk
to
him,
he
says
yes,
we
will.
We
will
gladly.
We
will
barely
put
him
as
a
proposer
instead
of
you,
okay,
so
it
goes
in
all
different
ways.
You
know
so
you
add,
you
can
add
more
composers,
you
can
change
your
implementers.
A
A
A
A
Okay,
so
so,
let's,
okay,
so
let's
first
of
all
say
that
there
was
a
comment
I
mean.
I
guess
you
mean
that
someone
someone
commented
from
the
community
about
that
and
I
don't
I
know
I
saw.
I
saw
it
like
a
proposal
for
a
challenge
floating
around
about
like
a
challenge
to
add,
like
you
know,
kind
of
like
basically
like
pay
people
on
a
recurring
scale,
and
you
know
have
kind
of
like
kind
of
community
contributors
right
that
that
are
kind
of
salaried
by
the
treasury,
which
is
insane
which
is
cool.
A
The
prospect
of
of
having
members
of
the
community
paid
by
the
treasury
to
to
fulfill
certain
functions
that
are
relevant
to
the
catalyst
process
sounds
like
a
amazing
and
incredible
experiment
would
be
super
into
it
and
I
would
love
to
collaborate
with
whoever
it
is
and-
and
I
think
it's
it's
a
step
in
the
right
direction-
to
really
decentralized
catalyst.
So
you
know
not
just
decentralizing
a
technical
level
but
in
the
human
process
level.
So
that
sounds
exciting
to
me.
A
A
You
know
I'm
just
I'm
just
a
temporary
steward
of
this
of
this
of
this
process,
and
but
I
really
want
to
be.
I
want
to
be
replaced
eventually,
that
that
would
be
the
epitome
of
of
what
I'm
doing.
Okay,
so
like
replaced
by
you,
know
someone
elected
and
funded
by
the
community.
Okay.
So
how
are
projects
merged
with
other
prod
with
other?
Is
there
a
function
for
it
through
the
catalyst
projects
for
the
idea
makers?
A
Yes,
actually
in
within
id
scale,
there
is
the
ability
to
merge
proposals
together,
and
I
think
that
functionality
is
can
be
is
exposed
through
the
interface,
and
you
can
really
do
that
like
that
and
if,
for
some
reason
it's
not
exposed,
then
we
have
it
on
our
back
end.
So
then,
then,
like
the
two
proposing
teams,
the
two
or
more
productivities
can
come
message
anna
and
tell
her
hey.
We
want
to
unite
hey,
we
want
to
unite
these
proposals
and
we
will
merge
them
together.
So
we
have.
A
That's
a
great
yeah.
It's
a
great
issue,
that's
a
great
trade-off
that
we
need
to
think
about.
I
mean
there's,
there's
many
ways
we
can
skin
that
cat
okay.
So
so
I
mean
I
I
know
now,
I'm
just
brainstorming.
You
know
just
reacting
to
what
you're
saying,
because
it's
true
it's
it's,
it's
actually
really
healthy,
like
you
know
like
if
you
look
at
something
like
dash.
A
Okay
and
the
fact
that
dash
is
it's
been
for
many
years,
but
we
already
passed
the
you
know
we
after
one,
after
one
attempt,
we
already
have
more
engagement
than
them.
You
know
and-
and
I
think
one
of
the
reasons
they
have
low
engagement-
is
that
the
same
teams
keep
getting
funded.
They
just
have
like
some
core
team
and
they
keep
you
know
they
they
control.
They
get
90
of
the
funding,
and
it's
just
like
this.
So
it's
not
interesting,
it's
not
engaging,
there's,
no
innovation
really
flowing.
A
You
know
in
their
bag
of
vote.
You
know
that
in
their
bag
of
votes
they
you
know
they
diversify.
I
think
I
think
another
way
to
to
deal
with
it
is.
You
can
have
a
specific
challenge
that
just
about
you
know,
for
example,
you
can
say
like
chat
that
we
can
propose
a
challenge
that
says
this
is
just
a
flash
fund.
A
So
it's
like
all
proposals
here
are
just
can
can
apply
to
up
to
500
bucks,
let's
say
funding
and
it's
just
about
giving
people
who
are
like
completely
new
to
the
category
system
like
a
chance
to
prove
themselves.
Okay,
so
and
that's
the
challenge
you
know
so
so
you
can
you
can
you
can
and
then
maybe
the
community
likes
this
idea
and
they
vote
it.
So
so
and
then
you
there
you
go,
then
you
have
like
a
generator
of
new
proposals.
A
So
this
is
like
another
another
thought
and
I
think
there's
like
many
many
more
other
ways
and
I'd
love
for
the
community
to
to
think
about
it
and
how
how
we
can
how
we
can
do
this
diversity.
I
think
in
okay,
I
think
in
fantasy
we
see
actually
a
good
mix
of
of
established
and
kind
of
relatively
new.
So
I'm
not
sure
if
it's
like
a
huge
problem
yet.