►
Description
Meeting description here: https://github.com/ipfs/team-mgmt/issues/992#issuecomment-644204439
For more information on IPFS
- visit the project website: https://ipfs.io
- or follow IPFS on Twitter: https://twitter.com/IPFS
Sign up to get IPFS news, including releases, ecosystem updates, and community announcements in your inbox, each Tuesday: http://eepurl.com/gL2Pi5
A
Hello:
everyone
welcome
to
the
IPF
Escorial
fermentations
weekly
thing
for
Monday,
the
15th
of
June
2020
I
am
making
brain
I
will
be
your
host.
We
are
going
to
go
through
the
list
of
initiatives
and
then
the
lesser
initiatives,
and
then
questions
and
parking
lots
and
quite
reading
and
all
good
stuff.
A
B
C
C
Apart
from
that,
we
got,
some
review
appears
in
review
related
to
subdomains.
One
is
for
forwarded
host
and
second
one
is
for
redirect
to
a
different
house
name,
both
probably
probably
the
first
one
so
makes
the
second
one
redundant
and
there's
a
separate
PR
for
in
review
for
supporting
wildcards,
that's
also
from
insurer.
The
idea
is,
if
some
gateway
operator
wants
to
create
a
separate
namespaces
or
like
a
private
subdomain
gateways
per
user
may
be
to
improve
tracking
or
something
that
that
feature
is
under
review.
C
I
did
not
do
any
significant
progress
on
the
PR,
where
we
tackle
long
see
IDs
in
subdomains,
but
I
talked
with
some
people
about
potential
UX
ramifications
and
I'm
leaning
into
a
position
that
if
we
decide
to
do
that,
we'll
probably
need
to
show
our
and
temporary
error
page
informing
users
that
the
CID
is
long
and
then
give
a
link.
If
user
wants
to
explicitly
rehash
the
roots
and
load
it
from
subdomain
that
sector
on
the
update
on
her
phone
that
one
then
that's
it
from
and.
C
I
mean
like
we
for
sure
we
want
to
show
an
error
instead
of
silently
rehashing
stuff
and
redirecting
people
to
a
different
CID
the
do
if
we
want
to
give
a
like
a
button
for
doing
that
automatically.
That's
like
an
open
question.
We
might
just
ship
arrow
page
first
and
then,
if
there's
an
actual
needs,
we
may
deliver
a
rehash
it
later.
It'd.
E
Be
really
nice
if
there's
some
way
to
detect
whether
or
not
like
you're
loading,
something
that's
like
a
main
eh.
You
know
resource
like
a
website
versus
you're,
just
fetching
something
from
a
gateway
because,
like
I
think
the
most
acutely,
there's
two
things:
it's
one
a
wage
like
serve
static
resources,
which
case
we
don't
care
about
the
basket
way
that
case
we
could
just
like
stop
all
javascript.
E
E
E
It's
okay
signal
opposed.
It
could
be
like
we
don't
want
to
integration
where,
like
somebody
uses
a
break,
we're
browsers
or
a
change,
the
newsagent
suddenly
they're
insecure.
It
would
be
bad,
I
guess
fine.
We
can
usually
in
that
case
we
can
just
block
JavaScript
yeah
or
like
use.
The
content
policy
to
block
JavaScript
are.
E
But
like
what
we're
trying
to
do
here
is
like
in
context
where
you're
not
actionable
Hauser
I
just
want
to
serve
you.
The
content,
because
you're
asked
for
the
content
and
like
this
might
be
like
you
included
some
static
content
in
your
website
or
like
you're,
trying
to
fetch
content
from
like
a
scratch
or
some
local
thing
versus
you're,
trying
to
load
this
thing
with
web
browsers
like
the
root
origin,
where
you
actually
care
about
the
company
and
say
for
origin.
H
So
this
week
we
fixed
a
erase
in
fear
manager
to
do
with
connections
and
then
we're
also
working
on
refactoring
bit,
swap
how
it
receives
messages
in
order
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
missing
or
occasionally
we
could
get
into
a
situation
where
we
asked
for
once
that
has
actually
just
been
received,
and
so
we
need
to
ask
for
it
twice,
so
we
never
receive
it.
So
there's
that
and
then
we're
also
trying
to
kind
of
simplify
how
help
it's.
What
works
internally,.
D
A
E
A
Fair
enough,
maybe
migration
to
mulch
keys
in
the
blot
store,
so
I
was
working
on
the
migration
tool
to
unblock
this
and
had
a
hell
of
a
time
with
index
TV
transactions
because
he
liked
to
do
on
migration.
You
get
a
query
your
three
over
the
things
in
the
database
and
you
me
take
the
database
and
index
TV
does
not
like
that.
If
you're
you
doing
mutations
outside
of
a
transaction,
it
basically
kills
the
initial
transaction,
basically
the
whole
week
banging
my
head
against
up
anything.
F
So
I
got
all
the
IPS
that
casts
interfaces
passing
now,
except
fuse
that
I
have
disabled,
which
I
had
the
sale,
because
some
of
them
are
doing
some
normalization
between
CID
pass,
plus
sorry,
se
D
plus
path,
sync,
which
I
don't
have
implement
yet.
So
those
already
said
others
and
everything
is
passing
on
my
machine.
However
I
having
hard
time
to
get
any
of
this
passing
on
CI,
because
there's
a
lot
of
intermediate
failures
from
what
I
can
tell
so
my
tests
never
even
get
to
run
six
get
aborted
earlier.
A
F
A
F
A
A
Cool
anything
else,
we've
gone
through
this
meeting
in
record
time.
We've
got
a
whole
ten
minutes
that
we
can
have
back
and
spend
it
wisely
or
unwisely.
It's
up
to
you,
cool
and
okay.
So
I
will
call
this
meeting
to
a
close
that
has
been
the
ipfs
core
weekly
sync
for
Monday,
the
15th
of
June
2020.
Thank
you
all
for
coming
see
you
on
the
Internet
hi.