►
From YouTube: IPFS Docs & Developer UX Weekly Sync 2019-10-28
Description
Learn more about the work of the IPFS Docs & Developer UX Working Group and how to join our weekly syncs: https://github.com/ipfs/docs
Notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EOD-pJi4GvRmGi9HHocgVV8uVHMFIZlyVgJDkvC3DQ4/edit#heading=h.dgr8wcldbq68
A
As
always,
the
purpose
of
this
meeting
is
to
update
each
other
on
our
progress
against
our
okay
ours,
and,
with
that
in
mind,
we
can't
go
ahead
and
set
out
in
unless
anybody
has
any
additional
additional
comments.
On
top
of
our
usual
check
in
anyone.
Anyone
I
take
your
silence
as
no
all
right
cool
Chris.
Do
you
want
to
keep
us
up
to
date
on
the
docs,
for
you
know
long
Shh
sure.
C
B
This
is
been
a
good
week.
Every
week
is
a
good
week,
but
this
has
been
an
exceptionally
many
pieces
came
together
this
week,
which
is
great
alignment,
so
we
we
kind
of
folded
the
prototype
into
the
new
beta
app,
so
I
guess.
The
first
thing
to
announce
is
that
we
we
now
have
a
public
repo
which
I've
linked
in
the
notes
there.
B
So
it's
the
top
line
of
the
beta
and
aquarium
doctor
launch.
So
that's
now
the
new
baseline
application
that
we're
using
as
primary
development.
This
is
now
setup
for
CI.
It
currently
is
building
against
just
notify
for
the
meantime.
Well,
where
I'm
working
on
very
staging
mechanics
and
branch
testing
and
we've
basically
set
up
the
baseline,
seemso
and
Jessica
can
probably
pop
open
the
URL
for
that,
while
you're
on
the
screen,
where.
A
B
B
So
this
URL
may
change
it's
temporary
for
if
anyone's
watching,
it's
essentially
our
working
project,
progress
at
the
moment,
we've
poured
it
across
the
navigation
from
the
prototype
and
we've
had
various
discussions
around
how
we're
going
to
format
this
and
essentially
stylize
the
individual
entry
points.
There's
some
configuration
around
different
tiers
and
individual
categories
that
we've
got
into
that.
So
we
using
this
is
a
work
in
progress
at
the
moment.
B
The
next
stage
is
essentially
to
go
through
remi
milestones,
which
are
towards
lab
week
in
next
two
weeks
and
that'll,
be
mainly
porting
over
the
content
from
the
existing
site
to
have
a
fully
working
prototype
like-for-like
of
the
existing
content
that
we've
got
now
ready
for
when
supreme
technical
writer
on
board
at
the
beginning
of
november.
So
we'll
have
a
fresh
site
ready
for
trying
and
prototyping
with
from
there.
We
are
going
to
continue
to
extend
that
and
essentially
write
out
the
all
the
all
the
pages
that
are
currently.
B
We
don't
have
content
for
we're
going
to
design
the
stuff
that
Eric
was
been
working
on,
which
is
the
essential
splash
screen
for
content
that
doesn't
exist
yet
so
we
can
start
to
have
a
voting
mechanic
for
anything
that
doesn't
exist,
and
then
we
can
start
to
get
some
insight
from
that.
So
I
guess
next
steps
are
really
within
this
week,
we'll
be
migrating
rs.2
content
across
configuring,
a
few
remaining
plugins
just
to
make
sure
that
we've
got
the
appropriate
embedded
code
for
playing
videos
and
the
code
view
for
different
syntax
snippets.
B
We
want
to
integrate.
We
also
had
some
discussion
that's
week
around
how
we're
going
to
do
the
API
layout.
So
essentially
we
might
try
and
present
some
various
code
examples
side-by-side,
so
we
can
have
different
J
s
and
go
implementations
on
the
same
screen,
so
you
can
switch
between
them,
but
these
this
is
to
be
decided.
So
we're
just
going
to
see
what
is
available
to
us
and
essentially
just
get
the
thing
working.
B
A
Something
that
people
can
at
least
play
with
to
some
degree
at
lab
week,
which
is
wonderful
and-
and
you
know
beyond
that-
you
know
anything
beyond
that
is
definitely
I.
Think
that
we,
your
intent,
is
to
have
something
up
and
running
by
lab.
You
can
get
some
good
feedback
from
folks
internal
to
PL,
as
we
continue
working
on
suffragists
fantastic.
Thank
you
so
much.
B
I
should
note
that
there
is
actually
an
issue
open
that
we
will
connect
the
two
sites
together
at
some
point,
so
there
will
be
when
we're
sort
of
saying
this
is
an
official
open
to
the
public.
Then
we'll
have
a
banner
across
the
existing
Doc's
that
will
pull
you
in
or
invite
you
to
come
and
join
the
beta.
So
while
that
doesn't
exist
this
essentially
you
sneaky
previews
for
everybody,
and
you
can
play
around
with
what
we're
building
but
welcome
any
feedback
in
the
meantime.
So
it's
just
the
case
of
this
is
our
staging
product.
A
Other
words,
if
you're
one
of
the
people
who
are
so
on
it
in
order
to
drop
in
and
watch
this
meeting,
you
get
a
little
bit
of
a
surprise
so
on
you,
but
yeah
we'll
have
we'll
have
bi-directional
linking
to
and
from
the
video
just
to
encourage
folks
to
go
back
and
forth.
This
thing
is
we're
in
a
little
bit
more
of
a
solid,
publicly
useful
state.
Maybe.
A
We
promise
some
sort
of
swag,
we
don't
know
what
that
swag
is,
but
we
promise
swags
so
feel
free
to
make
us
make
it
on
that
promise.
Carrying
forward
the
recurring
item
for
the
legacy
dogs
deprecation
plan,
again
we're
just
adding
notes
to
issues
308
as
we
go
along
of
this
initial
stage
of
building
things.
Those
notes
will
eventually
because
they
didn't
they're
newer,
more
formal
deprecation,
and
so
this
is
just
saying.
Network
continues,
metrics
definition
for
the
Vita
site.
A
We
are
holding
off
on
this
until
we're
a
little
bit
further
into
finding
the
Vita
site,
but
we're
getting
closer
and
closer
I'm,
also
looking
forward
to
John
onboarding
next
Monday,
so
that
we
can
start
talking
about
exactly
what
sort
of
metrics
and
data
we
want
to
capture
Vita
site.
Is
this
helpful
feedback
mechanism?
This
is
this
is
complete
as
we
discussed
last
week.
The
visuals
for
this
are
complete
under
issue
305
and
once
we're
a
little
further
in
the
Vita
site,
we
can
tackle
that
an
issue
306
just
as
a
refresher.
A
This
is
the
fantastically
interesting
lovely.
Is
this
helpful
widget
one
here
with
a
workflow
very
similar
to
what
we
have
on
our
existing
site,
but
is
a
little
bit
more
detailed?
Gives
the
user
an
open
feedback
box
and
put
stuff
in
I?
Guess
my
question
to
you,
which
I
think
Chris
you
sort
of
answered
and
post
whether
this
is
something
that
might
be
worth
tackling
while
we're
migrating
content.
But
it
sounds
like
you've
got
a
sort
of
your
roadmap
sort
of
sorted
out
as
it
is
I.
D
B
If
we
don't
really
need
any
people
dropping
any
feedback
directly
to
the
issue
queue,
then
perhaps
we
look
at
another
more
lightweight
way
of
having
some
dynamic
feedback.
It
just
means
that
if
we
have
an
open-ended
feedback
box,
that
is
just
them
a
forum
like
that,
but
it
means
that
we
lose
the
context
of
the
user.
So
we
don't
have
any
opportunity
to
reply
to
them.
I'll
follow
up
so
it
could
it's
a
pros
and
cons
towards
into
so
yeah
I.
B
A
Necessary
and
as
you
as
you
noted,
you
said
this
is
the
current
site.
We
did
add
this
information
here
and
add
this
week,
some
that
are
issued
templating
so
that
if
you
open
an
issue
it
actually
gives
you
some
prompts
to
questions
to
ask.
It
also
gives
us
the
referring
page.
It
labels
them
accordingly,
so
that
we
can
prioritize
it
in
our
issue:
queue
as
well,
so
so
yeah
we'll
see
we'll
see
how
that
goes.
Response
wise
and
good
point
became
it.
We
can
go
from
that
awesome.
A
Usability
testing:
we
have
not
done
any
new
testing
this
week,
but
that's
because
we've
been
in
actually
deploying
the
test
results
from
the
ia
testing
and
both
are
a
couple
of
weeks
ago
on
the
Vita
site,
as
you
just
saw
my
intent.
Hopefully,
today,
I
don't
have
too
many
meetings
is
actually
I'll
open
up
a
starter
branch
for
the
external
links
in
that
non
structure,
so
we
can
at
least
knock
those
out
meetings
permitting
recurring
item
features
voting.
We
do
have
a
public-facing
voting
page
for
this
now,
which
is
great
I'm
an
admin.
You
see.
A
This
isn't
exactly
what
the
user
will
see
me,
but
we
do
have
all
of
our
items
that
we
wanted
to
get
external
prioritization
on
from
our
futures
comparison
list
in
here.
This
is
ready
to
launch.
We
just
have
to
figure
out
exactly
how
we
want
to
launch
it
and
socialize.
It
sounds
like
our
opinion.
Right
knows
that
it
should
go
hand-in-hand
with
the
docs
video
just
to
give
people
a
context,
so
this
is
probably
gonna
be
on
hold
for
a
couple
of
weeks,
but
it
is
queued
up
and
ready
to
go.
A
A
B
I
mean
the
simplest
ways
that
we
can
I
just
have
a
link
that
point
straight
out
to
it.
Then
it
doesn't
feel
like
it's
a
part
of
the
site,
but
then
you
know
we
can
also
use
the
API
to
pull
individual
views
in
as
we
want
to
so
I'm,
considering
using
it
as
the
way
of
voting
for
content,
that's
up
and
coming
yeah,
so
that
that
way
we
can
have,
we
could
user
suggest
box.
For
so
we
can
have
a
separate
board.
B
B
A
Awesome
well,
let
me
know
what
you
find
out,
because
that's
probably
stuff
that
I
can
help
out
with
your
current
item.
You
get
a
system
I.
This
is
on
hold
because
Eric,
it's
and
because
of
lab
week
so
continue
to
watch
this
space
and
you're
not
dead
yet
so
this
is
good.
A
A
This
is
like
directly
fixing
stuff
you,
admittedly
there's
a
bit
of
a
bucket
right
now,
because
we're
diverting
a
lot
of
efforts
to
migrating
the
docs
to
the
new
platform.
But
then
that
said,
we
will
make
sure
that
we
address
as
many
sort
of
small
existing
contents
on
the
legacy
site
as
we
can
just
so
that
we
can.
We
can
migrate
the
cleanest
thing
possible
over
and
stop
work
on
the
legacy
platform.
Avast
site
I
did
get
to
close
a
couple
of
things.
There's
a
few
things
still
in
progress.
A
We
have
an
external,
a
contributor
PR
that
I'm
waiting
to
hear
back
on
or
like
one
new
piece
of
documentation,
which
is
super
sweet
user,
driven
as
far
as
user
driven
issues,
content,
specific
issues
that
came
about
as
a
result
due
to
user
feedback.
We
are,
we
have
one
in
the
icebox
6
in
our
soon
queue.
The
good
news
at
that
is
that's
a
pretty
small
number.
Three
new
issues
are
in
review
since
last
week.
A
That
includes
issues
that
I
just
referred
to
and
I
was
able
to
close
four
small
issues
regarding
related
Russia.
Things
like
one
of
them
was
the
better
issue
Chaplin
as
far
as
legacy
issues
that
we
inherited
from
the
old
dock
site,
my
old
website,
repo
yeah,
there's
still
23
of
those
in
the
icebox
14
of
those
are
in
soon
that
is
mainly
net
new
contact
requests.
A
So
the
rate
of
change
on
that
at
the
moment
is
not
really
going
to
be
specifically
super
super
far,
but
we
did
close
to
since
last
week
and
put
one
in
review,
which
is
good,
so
progress
is
happening
in
progress
will
continue
once
John
joins
us
next
week,
and
that
brings
us
to
this
guy
recurring
item
content
close
reading.
This
is
John's
primary
now.
Boarding
caste
is
already
taking
a
little
bit
of
an
initial
review
in
the
meantime,
look
forward
to
chatting
about
the
specifics
of
getting
this
done.
E
Okay,
so
we're
getting
really
close
to
finishing
the
new
tutorial
I've
been
working
on
refactoring
a
couple
of
lessons.
We
had
structure
differently
at
the
start
and
now
we're
mostly
working
on
the
feedback
for
incorrect
answers
in
the
exercises,
and
we
still
need
we're
still
waiting
for
a
final
name
for
the
API
were
teaching.
A
C
I
will
make
my
video
up
here,
oh,
never,
mind
that
there
we
go
good,
my
name
in
a
very
dark
room:
the
darkness
of
video
one
item
that
I
was
curious
about
coming
up
in
this
hurt.
More
was
and
things
like
our
discussion
forum
and
if
there
are
ways
that
we
can
be
grabbing
feedback
from
sources
like
that,
it's
not
directly
related
but
Jessica.
As
you
were
doing.
C
Another
request
is
I
took
a
look
last
week
at
the
metrics
that
we're
seeing
on
our
existing
documentation
site
on
what
things
are
getting
them.
You
know
all
of
the
metrics
work
you
guys
implemented
last
quarter,
what
things
are
getting
the
most
positive
feedback
and
what
things
are
getting
more
negative
feedback
super
useful
and
directional,
and
here
if
we
could
have
kind
of
little
readouts
on
that
in
this
weekly
meeting,
because
I
think
it's
useful
direction
for
us
to
remind
us
where
we
should
be
focusing.
Yes,.
A
So,
regarding
regarding
the
forums
you
know,
I
I,
certainly
they
know
others
on
the
team
have
been
working
on
the
forums
on
you
know.
If,
for
nothing
else,
you
know
getting
getting
the
daily
and
weekly
comment
thread.
Recaps
I
am
keeping
I
am
monitoring
those
in
case
there's
something
you
know
like
actually
specifically
add
to
the
issue.
Queue
there's
been
a
couple
of
vacations
right
now
and
it
offered
some
feedback
or
pointing
people
at
specific
things.
A
But
do
you
know
that
we
are
keeping
an
eye
on
that
yeah
good
point
about
let's,
as
far
as
just
like,
we
haven't,
we
let
the
super.
The
super
high
metrics
watching
slide
for
a
couple
of
weeks,
because
we're
so
busy
implementing
the
new
bf,
but
let's
just
make
sure
that
we
that
we
add
that
too
yeah
Chris
had
it.
How
best
you
want
to
do
that.
It.
B
Was
actually
thinking
just
last
week
about
trying
to
find
a
better
way
to
report
on
this
and
partly
because
the
numbers
themselves?
Actually,
then
you
have
to
do
some
mental
arithmetic
to
work
out
so
I
go
seven
people
said
this
is
passe,
but
also
for
people
said
it
was
negatives.
What
is
the
overall
sentiment
so
I'm
going
to
look
at
a
better
way
to
present
that
and
do
sort
of
an
average
between
it?
B
So
if
there
are
10
events
and
three
were
positive
and
three
more
negative
or
whatever
else
and
o7
were
negative,
whereas
then
we'd
have
we
be
able
to
have
a
gauge
of
what
is
what
requires
the
most
action?
So
I
I
started
out
on
a
second
page
on
the
data
studio,
but
I
don't
know
data
studio
enough
to
get
around
it.
It's
a
whole
new
sort
of
wizard
ballgame,
so
I
will
think
I'll
pick
that
up
and
see.
B
If
I
can
integrate
that,
because
then
we
could
just
have
a
link
or
some
kind
of
high-level
overview
and
see
like
these
are
the
top
level
and
piece
of
content
we
need
to
pay
attention
to,
and
that
will
give
us
some
better
month-on-month
to
a
progress
then,
because
we
can
then
roll
over
a
whole
period
of
time
where
we
can
see
their
sentiment
on
a
piece
of
content
over
a
longer
period
of
time.
So
if
that
sentiment,
changes,
we've
improved
it
and
we
can
op
see
see
if
yeah
we're
going
in
the
right
direction.
A
A
So
far
I
mean
maybe
we
should
have
a
separate,
separate
discussion
about
this
in
another
channel,
but
I
just
wanna
make
sure
that
we're
not
committing
ourselves.
You
know
this
point.
I
can
say
no
that
we're
keeping
out
in
the
forum's
I,
also
just
don't
want
to
over
commit
ourselves
in
a
stupidly,
crazy
quarter
to
to
actually
being
sort
of
de
facto
community
moderators.
In
that
sense,
Erik
sorry,
yeah.
D
Back
to
the
helpful,
not
helpful
content,
just
broad
blanket
statement
of
encouragement
is
that
you
know
we
get
a
lot
more.
We
do
get
a
lot
more
votes,
thumbs
up,
votes
for
content,
then
thumbs
down.
It's
it's
a
there.
Really,
it's
it's
just
a
smattering
of
thumbs
down,
and
you
know
it's
actually
a
smattering
of
those
period
because
people
generally
don't
you
know
how
often
do
do
you
click
on
those
kind
of
things,
but
you
know
given
that
people
are
tend
to
not
click
on
those.
You
interact
with
those
kinds
of
features
and
I.
D
A
A
B
A
We
did
just
the
the
better
get
have
issue
templating
stuff,
I,
think
I
pushed
that
on
Thursday.
So
that's
like
super
brand
new.
You
know
I
think
it'll.
Take
us
a
couple
of
weeks
to
see
if
anybody,
actually
you
see
how
people
respond
to
that,
we
also
move
to
the
opening
github
issue
linked
up
out
of
the
footer.
So
it's
a
lot
more
prominent,
so
I'm,
hoping
that
we're
gonna
see
better
uptake
on
that.
We'll
see
how
that
goes.
A
C
Yeah
I
know
that
okay
are
there
like
okay,
ours
and
the
way
that
we
formatted
meeting
notes
are
super
similar,
but
I
think
we
are
worse,
we're
still
a
little
bit
of
ways
away
from
mid-quarter,
but
like
it's
a
really
short
quarter,
so
just
encourage
people
to
like
take
a
peek
back
early
to
make
sure
that
that
everything
is
as
as
a
line
is
expected
to
be
I.
Think
you
guys
are
well
on
track.
But
I'm
gonna
make
this
recommendation
in
all
meetings
this
week.
So
yeah.
A
Sure
this
is
this
is
an
interesting
one,
because
I
think
that's
just
how
weird
line
over
ok,
ours
I
think
we're
not
letting
that,
like
the
vast
majority
of
our
percentage,
progress
on
every
single
one
of
these
issues
is
gonna
come
right
at
the
end,
so
I'm
sort
of
I'm
sort
of
anticipating
the
feeling
of
like
not
feeling
all
that
great
about
our
numbers
mid-quarter,
but
realizing
that
it's
just
how
the
how
the
work
itself
is
laid
out.
We're
gonna
be
kind
of
sliding
into
that.
I
think.
A
A
Other
spaces
I
think
we
sound
like
80
bazillion
things
in
the
launch,
the
Vita
site,
epic,
keeping
in
mind
that
our
that
our
ok,
our
was
actually
a
launch
of
Vita
site
with
one
to
one
content
parody.
That
said,
we
should
achieve
that.
Maybe
like
the
middle
of
next
week,
yeah
and
that's
our
that's
our
biggest
thing,
I
think
the
one
thing
that
I'm
feeling
you
know
like
the
one
thing
that
was
optimistic
was
the
ecosystem
on
it.
A
That's
a
TG,
that's
something
that
we
really
wanted
to
do,
but
captain
Monning
they're
like
bearing
it
being
a
super
short
quarter.
You
know
we
threw
that
in
there
as
sort
of
a
stretch
hole
if
we
don't
interview
that
way.
No
need
to
do
that,
but
but
yeah
I
mean,
strictly
speaking
with
a
blotched
Armada,
so
obviously
I
think
Kelly
were
we're
well
on
track.
I,
just
I.
Just
don't
want
us
to
have
you
know
like
sticker
shock.
B
A
B
D
I
think
that
heading
the
website,
even
one-to-one
content,
just
mapped
over
into
this
new
structure,
new
environment,
that
and
to
just
do
that
and
then
sit
back
and
you
know
and
see
how
people
react
to
it
and
see
how
we
react
to
it
as
we
play
with
it.
That's
gonna,
really!
That's
when,
when
we
really
I
think
they're
gonna
start
to
find
areas,
oh
like,
oh,
we
need
to,
and
it's
gonna
be
much
more
content
focused.
You
know
like
actually
improving
the
docks
market.
B
A
Bunch
of
issues
like
do
we
do
we
hire
translation
for
our
tatsurion
languages.
Do
we
want
to
invest
the
money
in
that
discussion
for
another
time?
But
you
know
that's
a
that's.
That's
one
of
those
perfect
things
for
outsourcing
I
say
having
spent
an
hour
shoveling
a
foot
of
snow
this
morning,
realizing
that
is
additionally
something
perfect
for
outsourcing
people
have
better
tools
better
at
this.
I
can
pay
them
to
do
it.
Yeah.
That's
one
of
the
logic
for
consider.
A
That's
true
that
is
true:
I'm
not
gonna
have
to
have
to
hurry
up
my
gym
membership
before
talking
he's
this
way,
the
only
other
caution
that
I
want
to
have
you
and
AG.
You
bring
up
a
good
point
about,
like
porting
the
dogs
content,
parity,
letting
us
sit.
We
do
have
to
be
conscious
of
the
fact
that
our
initial
set
of
metrics
are
going
to
be.
A
The
result
on
the
beat
aside
are
gonna,
be
the
result
of
a
site,
that's
still
very
much
in
flux,
so
we
may
want
to
get
some
thought
as
to
like
formally
declaring
like
a
metrics
baseline.
You
know
I,
don't
want
to
say,
let's
do
it,
because
we
were
dealing
with
much
heavier
site
traffic
and
we
could
say
alright,
let's
not
change
anything
for
two
weeks
and
get
baseline
numbers.
A
That
would
be
one
thing
but
I,
just
you
with
the
site
traffic
that
we're
seeing
it
wouldn't
be
two
weeks
it
would
be
a
month
and
I'm
not
going
to
stop
progress
for
a
month
just
to
get
those
baseline
numbers,
but
that's
another
discussion.
We
should
probably
keep
in
the
back
of
our
minds
cool
now.
We're
out
of
time
all
right,
ladies
and
gents.
Thank
you
so
much
I
shall
upload
this
meeting
to
the
youtubes
and
I
shall
see
you
all
next
week.
If
not
sooner,
enjoy
your
Monday.